samedi 29 octobre 2011

L'évêque Williamson sur le déicide

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8rLKLB21QTM/Tq3Wn2qpaaI/AAAAAAAABIg/SNKVuVmSW7A/s1600/dancing%2Bmocking.jpegMiroir de la Salvation humaine, France XVe siècle. Les juifs assemblés sous la croix se réjouissent de la mort du Christ. L'idée que les juifs aient pu danser autour de la croix peut être rapprochée d'une disposition du IVe Concile du Latran, 1215: "Les jours de lamentation et le dimanche de la Passion, les juifs devront s'abstenir de paraître en public: certains d'entre eux, en effet, nous l'avons appris, osent en de tels jours arborer leurs plus beaux habits, et se moquent des chrétiens qui portent des signes de deuil en mémoire de la très sainte Passion. Nous leur interdisons rigoureusement de danser de joie en outrage au Rédempteur."

15 octobre 2011

[Mgr Williamson - Commentaire Eleison] L'orgueil des ancêtres

SOURCE - Mgr Williamson, fsspx - Commentaire Eleison - 15 octobre 2011

Au deuxième volume de sa vie de Jésus publié au début de l’année, le Pape Benoît XVI s’est exprimé sur la mort de Jésus de façon à permettre aux journalistes de conclure hâtivement qu’il ne faut plus imputer aux juifs la responsabilité du déicide, c’est-à-dire d’avoir mis à mort Dieu. Pire encore, le 17 mai le directeur exécutif du Secrétariat pour les Affaires Œcuméniques et Interreligieuses de la Conférence Episcopale des Etats-Unis a affirmé qu’à aucun moment de l’histoire on ne peut accuser les juifs de déicide sans se mettre hors de la communion de l’Eglise catholique. A l’encontre de ce que beaucoup de gens veulent croire aujourd’hui, il est temps de rappeler, même brièvement, ce qu’enseignait toujours l’Eglise sur le meurtre judiciaire de Jésus.

D’abord le meurtre de Jésus fut vraiment un « déicide », c’est-à-dire meurtre de Dieu, parce que Jésus fut une des trois Personnes divines qui outre sa nature divine avait assumé une nature humaine. Qu’est-ce qui fut tué sur la Croix ? Seulement la nature humaine. Mais qui fut tué sur la Croix dans sa nature humaine ? Personne d’autre que la deuxième Personne divine, c’est-à-dire Dieu. Donc c’est bien Dieu qui a été tue, autrement dit, c’est le déicide qui a eu lieu.


Ensuite Jésus est mort en croix pour nous sauver tous, tous les hommes pécheurs, de nos péchés, et dans ce sens-ci il est vrai que tous les hommes furent et sont le but de sa mort. Mais uniquement les juifs (chefs et peuple) ont été les principaux agents du déicide parce que dans les Evangiles il saute aux yeux que le non-juif le plus impliqué, Ponce Pilate, n’aurait jamais condamné à mort Jésus si les chefs juifs n’avaient d’abord incité le peuple juif à réclamer sa mise en croix (Mt. XXVII, 20). Certes, les chefs éduqués étaient plus coupables que le peuple ignorant, dit St. Thomas (Somme III, 47, 5), mais tous ensemble ils ont hurlé pour que le sang de Jésus descende sur eux et sur leurs enfants (Mt.XXVII, 25).


En troisième lieu, le Pape Léon XIII au moins a estimé qu’il y a une vraie solidarité entre les juifs qui ont crié pour que Jésus meure et la collectivité des juifs des temps modernes. Dans son Acte de Consécration de la Race Humaine, n’a-t-il pas imposé à l’Eglise universelle à partir de la fin du 19me siècle de prier Dieu pour qu’il regarde enfin avec miséricorde « les enfants de ce peuple qui fut jadis votre préféré ; que sur eux aussi descende, mais aujourd'hui en baptême de vie et de Rédemption, le sang qu'autrefois ils appelaient sur leurs têtes. » ?

Mais Léon XIII est loin d’être le seul à avoir relevé cette solidarité entre les juifs de tous les temps. Aujourd’hui ne réclament-ils pas eux-mêmes la terre de Palestine en faisant valoir que c’est le Dieu de l’Ancien Testament qui la leur a donnée ? De tous les temps y a-t-il jamais eu sur la face de la terre une race-peuple-nation plus orgueilleuse de son identité à travers les siècles ? Elevés à l’origine par Dieu pour servir de crèche à son Messie, lorsqu’il est venu, hélas, ils ont refusé collectivement de le reconnaître. Collectivement aussi, ce qui veut dire qu’il y a toujours de nobles exceptions, ils sont restés fidèles à ce refus, en sorte qu’ils ont changé de religion. Celle d’Abraham, de Moïse et de l’Ancien Testament ils l’ont remplacée par celle d’Anne, de Caïphe et du Talmud. Tragiquement, c’est leur formation messianique même aux mains de Dieu qu’ils tordent pour rejeter sans cesse celui qu’ils tiennent pour un faux messie. L’Eglise a toujours enseigné qu’à la fin du monde ils se convertiront (cf. Rom. XI, 26-27), mais d’ici là il semble fatal qu’ils continueront d’agir, collectivement, en ennemis du vrai Messie.

Comment le Pape peut-il subvertir des vérités si anciennes?

Kyrie eleison.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-B85ykFTxoBM/Tq3XjNGUrgI/AAAAAAAABIs/dMffzy-qPYA/s1600/merchan.jpeg
Le baiser de Judas, Livre d'Heures de Jean duc de Berry, Fin du XIVe siècle. Rapprochement entre Judas, qui recevra trente deniers pour prix de sa trahison et un groupe de marchands juifs du Moyen Age représentés en bas et à droite.




Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Rabbis Order the Pope to Condemn Bishop Williamson's Biblical Preaching

Editor's note: Bishop Richard Williamson's "Eleison Comments" column, grounded in Scripture and the position of the Catholic Church for one thousand nine hundred sixty-five years (until the Second Vatican Council), was published in On the Contrary on Oct. 14 ("How Can Pope Benedict Let Go of Ancient Truths?"). With the usual chutzpah, the Conference of European Rabbis is demanding today that the Catholic pope condemn a Catholic bishop for preaching Catholic truth.

When is the pope going to call on Judaics to condemn murderous, racist rabbis for preaching Talmudic lies?

We support Bishop Williamson's right to publicly preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ!
_______________________

Pope called on to condemn bishop’s new anti-Semitic slur
October 19, 2011
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/10/19/3089896/controversial-catholic-bishop-makes-new-anti-semitic-remarks

Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt

BERLIN (Jewish Telegraph Agency) -- A group of European rabbis has called on the pope to condemn the latest anti-Semitic remarks by a Holocaust-denying Catholic bishop.

The Brussels-based Conference of European Rabbis slammed comments by Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson in which he allegedly blamed Jews for deicide. Williamson, a member of the radical Catholic Pius Brotherhood sect, reportedly made the comments in the latest issue of his newsletter, “The Eleison Comments." He has been living in London.

“Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics,” conference President Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of Moscow said in a statement issued Wednesday.

Goldschmidt called for the Church to "suspend negotiations with extremist Catholic tendencies until it is clear that these groups show a clear commitment to tackling anti-Semitism within their ranks."

In his newsletter, Williamson wrote that “only the Jews were the primary agents of the deicide because Pontius Pilate would never have condemned Jesus if the Jews had not asked for blood.”

Williamson was found guilty of Holocaust denial in Germany in 2010 and fined about $14,000. He has previously denied the existence of gas chambers and the murder of 6 million Jews during the Holocaust.

In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication against Williamson, but the Vatican also reportedly declared that "in order to be admitted to episcopal functions within the Church, (he) will have to take his distance, in an absolutely unequivocal and public fashion, from his position on the Shoah, which the Holy Father was not aware of when the excommunication was lifted."

During meetings with Pope Benedict in Berlin last month, German Jewish leader Dieter Graumann said that one of the issues that troubled Jewish-Catholic relations was the Church's refusal to condemn Williamson.

In his statement Wednesday, Goldschmidt said the pope "has shown a commitment to fostering a spirit of positive dialogue with Jews both before and during his papacy. But he must clearly show that there is no room in the Catholic Church for purveyors of hate."

Bishop Williamson's website:
http://www.dinoscopus.org



IT’S DONE
23/10/2012
Nous apprenons en totale exclusivité que le document annonçant l’expulsion de Mgr Williamson de la Fraternité Saint Pie X vient d’être promulgué. L’éviction de Son Excellence est donc à présent officielle.

Les Prêtres anti-ralliement dans la FSSPX, dégoutés, auraient réfléchis sur cette triste situation. Finalement, ils sont nombreux à penser que ce mal pourrait rapidement se transformer en bien … Mgr Williamson pourra à présent s’exprimer comme il veut, où il veut et quand il veut … Ce nouvel acte extrêmement grave de Mgr Fellay pourrait s’avérer, à moyen terme, une grande erreur stratégique dans sa politique de ralliement. Les instructions sont à présent claires : tirer plein feu sur les pro-ralliements qui ont noyauté la tête de la Tradition !
La Rome conciliaire refuse de se soumettre à la Foi Catholique n’a pas finit de pleurer ! Mgr Williamson est de retour et personne ne le fera taire !
A BAS LE CONCILE DE L’ENFER ! VIVE LA SEULE ET UNIQUE EGLISE CATHOLIQUE ! VIVE LE CHRIST ROI !
[ajout 19h15 : pour résumer TRES brièvement l'affaire : Mgr Fellay, Supérieur Général de la FSSPX, ne s'entend pas avec les trois autres évêques sur la question des irresponsables négociations qu'il a mené avec la Rome conciliaire. L'un de ces trois évêques, Mgr Williamson, qui s'était déjà fait remarquer par le passé en contestant l'existence des chambres à gaz (auxquelles on croit tous à fond), parlait plus fort que les autres sur cette affreuse politique de ralliement dans ces lettres publiques hebdomadaires appelées "Kyrie Eleison". Mgr Fellay, n'y tenant plus, lui lança finalement un ultimatum pour qu'il cesse de diffuser ces lettres. Mgr Williamson, après maintes réflexions, refusa. Il est expulsé.]
[ajout 24/10 20h20 : la FSSPX a communiqué ce matin publiquement sur le sujet : http://www.dici.org/actualites/communique-de-la-maison-generale-de-la-fraternite-saint-pie-x-23-octobre-2012 ]



 

AMERICAN FREE PRESS
Gutsy Bishop Refuses to Recant Beliefs
By Lady Michele Renouf
The $2,400 fine levied in Regensburg, Germany against British Bishop Richard Williamson, 72, on Jan. 16 is the latest outcome of a retrial over the politically incorrect opinions about the Holocaust the world’s last traditionally faithful Catholic bishop restated in 2008 when ambushed on German soil by a Swedish television crew. The aimof the reduced fine—levied for “Holocaust denial”—from just under $9,000 in 2011 to $2,400, was to encourage William-son to simply pay up. But in the case of this incorruptible bishop, who is not afraid to voice the warnings in the New Testament about usury, deceivers and treachery, this is not the end of it.
Years ago, commenting upon the forensic findings of scientists, experts, historians and the rigorous cross-examination of eyewitnesses—who admitted employing “poetic license”—presented during Ernst Zuendel’s 1988 “Great Holocaust Trial” in Ontario, Williamson said that the story of “6 million Jews murdered in mass homicidal gas chambers” during World War II was “lies, lies, lies.”
The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), whose founder, Marcel Lefebvre, consecrated Bishop Williamson in 1988, broke away from the church to oppose the Judaization of Catholicism engineered at the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. In 2008, the pope was preparing to lift the excommunication of the society’s members, but the society had to make “amends.”
This included excommunicating all bishops who refused to recant their “heresy” on the Holocaust.
Thus, Williamson, being a member, came under tremendous pressure from the leaders of the SSPX to abandon his defense and meekly accept criminalization for his beliefs about the Holocaust. Having failed to goad Williamson into resigning from the SSPX, the group’s head, Bishop Bernard Fellay, in compliance with tyrannical Jewish lobbying pressure, saw to Williamson’s expulsion.
Too little acknowledged nowadays are the warnings about the anti-gentiles—“the deceivers,” as they are described by the traditional SSPX and the Koran. These warnings arise over the Talmud, the Jewish law books and “middoth,” the Jewish fact-dismissive method of argument. The middoth, of course, is ethically incompatible with our classical truth-seeking culture. The Frankfurt School of deconstructive argument, still heavily influential since its infiltration into Germany’s intellectual spheres in 1923, is a latter-day manifestation of the Judaic middoth method of debate.
In his online “Eleison Comments” dated Jan. 19, Williamson clarifies his battle for the survival of Lefebvre’s original SSPX and the treachery of its current leadership—“a fish rotting from the head.”
Here we are, with more and more prosecutions for skeptical opinions being perpetrated across Europe.
Even sports stars in England are being recruited to give lessons on the Holocaust. Soccer heroes, born long after WWII, now endorse DVDs produced by the Holocaust Educational Trust for schools, entitled “Introduction to the Holocaust: Footballers Remember.” The same teaching guidelines apply—Hollywood style—to promote lies, not forensically objective history.
The official international “Guidelines for Teaching About the Holocaust” dictate that: “Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers . . . or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate or rational argument.”
Americans should not imagine that laws in 14 European countries, as well as Israel, against freedom of debate are confined to the Old World. This writer is banned by the state of Kentucky from showing up at the Ohio Valley Military Society’s annual late February “Show of Shows” for her political and historical views. If she does, all participants will be thrown out.
For the full story visit Lady Renouf’s website at www.tellingfilms.co.uk.







http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dtEzk_vCbVU/Tq3ZCWkBosI/AAAAAAAABI4/M_qq80VpQVE/s1600/jewfelons%2Bputhimoncross.jpeg
Crucifixion. Livre d'Heures dit de Rohan. France vers 1418. "Les soldats aussi se gaussèrent de lui. S'approchant pour lui présenter du vinaigre, ils disaient: " Si tu es le roi des Juifs, sauve-toi toi-même!" (Luc) Le miniaturiste a transformé les soldats romains en juifs et la légende confirme: "Ce sont les félons juifs qui mettent Jésus Christ en croix."


Ponce Pilate se lavant les mains est représenté coiffé du chapeau juif. Psautier de Liège, XIIIe siècle.
"Jesus in the Talmud" (Princeton Press, 2007) Talmud Spews Hatred of Christ, Christians, by Willis A. Carto


Michael Collins Piper, The Confessions of an Anti-Semite
(...)



Michael Collins Piper, in The Judas Goats--The Enemy Within
Chapter Nineteen 
The Vatican’s Own Enemy Within: 
Buckley Associate Malachi Martin’s 
Secret Role as a Subversive Acting on 
Behalf of Zionist Interests 

The identity of an operative for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith inside the Catholic Church during the Second Vatican Council in the early 1960s has been revealed: the late ex-priest-turnedbest- selling author, Malachi Martin, a longtime close associate of none other than William F. Buckley, Jr., himself an outspoken Roman Catholic. As a result of the revelations concerning Buckley’s friend Martin, some prominent Catholic traditionalist critics now call Martin a “de facto Zionist double agent” and a “priest-spy for Zionism”—labels that will come as a surprise to many good traditionalist Catholics who viewed Martin, at least in his later years, as their ally. 
It now turns out that this same “double agent”—Martin—was a financial backer of a conspiratorial group that was working to destroy Liberty Lobby, the Washington-based populist institution. 
It was Cincinnati-based Lawrence W. Patterson who was apparently the first-ever national publisher to unveil Martin as the so-called “priest-spy”inside the Vatican who, in Patterson’s words,was the key figure in “saving the Vatican II documents which have since been used to begin the attempted melding of Zionism and Catholicism.” 
In the April 1991 issue of his magazine Criminal Politics, Patterson called Martin the magazine’s “fake conservative of the month, fronting for the Trilateral/Zionist cause,” and outlined the explosive evidence indicting Martin. 
But Patterson is not the only major figure to expose Martin. Widely regarded revisionist historian Michael A.Hoffman II called Martin a “double-minded occultist”and a “20th century Judas.”(See Hoffman’s website at hoffman-info.com) 
In addition, Hutton Gibson, the outspoken lay traditionalist Catholic, said of Martin on a broadcast of Radio Free America (with host Tom Valentine) that “I think Martin was kind of a Judas Goat.He was at the Second Vatican Council and one of the things he did was call in bishops who were a little obstreperous and threaten them to get in line. Malachi Martin is not my idea of a Catholic.” 
The late Revilo P. Oliver, one of the great nationalist intellectuals, wrote that “if Martin did indeed play an important role in betraying the [Catholic] Church into the hands of its inveterate enemies, he certainly knew what he was doing. (See Oliver’s essay, “How They Stole the Church,” at revilo-oliver.com) 
Hoffman said that Martin “saved the day for the Jewish/Masonic infiltrators of the church.”In Criminal Politics, Patterson explained how Martin did just that, outlining the amazing story of Martin’s intrigue. Relying largely on an indubitably “mainstream” article, “How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking” by Joseph Roddy—published in the January 25, 1966 issue of the now-defunct Look magazine—Patterson pointed out that the Look article revealed quite candidly that a priest working inside the Vatican was shuttling back and forth between Rome and New York during the Vatican II proceedings. 
The priest was providing inside information about proposed Catholic Church “reforms” to not only The New York Times, but also to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee and its magazine, Commentary. 
Then, as the article noted, this confidential information leaked from inside the Vatican was then used to pressure the Vatican into making major changes in church policy. 
The Look author would not identify the priest by his real name, referring only to him as “Timothy Fitzharris-O’Boyle,” but also explained that this priest also wrote for Commentary under the name “F. E.Cartus” and had written a book, entitled The Pilgrim, under the name “Michael Serafian.”
(The Pilgrim was a 1964 book, rushed into print, according to Michael A. Hoffman II, for the very purpose of divulging efforts by traditionalists inside the Vatican to counter the proposed revolution in church teachings.) 
As Lawrence Patterson’s investigation determined, when Malachi Martin (by then an internationally-known writer) released his 1974 book, The New Castle, a filler page listing “books by Malachi Martin” indicated that Martin had written the aforementioned book, The Pilgrim, “under the pseudonym, Michael Serafian.” 
And as if Patterson’s revelations (based on Martin’s own published acknowledgment) are not enough evidence that he was indeed the “priest-spy” inside the Vatican, a July 31, 1999 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel obituary for Martin said that he had published The Pilgrim under the “Michael Serafian” pseudonym. 
Almost immediately after completing his subversive ventures inside the Vatican, Martin left the priesthood and went to New York where he began writing for the American Jewish Committee’s Commentary (under his real name) and acting as “religious editor” for William F. Buckley, Jr.’s National Review. 
In the years that followed, Martin’s novels and other works received widespread international promotion in the organs of the major media, making Martin almost certainly a multi-millionaire. 
According to Michael A. Hoffman II, Martin “was the descendant of a Jewish banker who sought refuge in Ireland,” where Martin was born in 1921. Hoffman scored Martin for, as recently as 1997, comparing himself with Maimonides, whom Hoffman identifies as “the foremost interpreter of the Jewish Talmud and one of the most implacable enemies of Christ in the annals of Judaism” who once “commanded the extermination of Christians.” 
This is interesting since Martin, in fact, did study at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem where he concentrated on the knowledge of Jesus Christ as transmitted in Jewish sources. Soon afterward, according to London’s Independent of August 6, 1999, Martin was “marked out as a high flyer” and promoted to a post at the Vatican as a theological advisor to Cardinal Augustin Bea, who was himself, along with several other of his advisors, of Jewish descent. 
It was Bea who emerged inside the Vatican as the prime mover behind the changes in church policy during Vatican II, and Martin acted as his agent in dealings with the Jewish community in New York City during that time frame. Revilo Oliver went so far as to suggest that Martin may have actually been a “courier” for vast amounts of cash bribes transferred out of New York to Rome and elsewhere during the Vatican II period. 
The fact that Martin forged a close relationship with William F. Buckley, Jr.—one that lasted for decades—is noteworthy since both Buckley and his former supervisor in the CIA, E. Howard Hunt, waged extensive (albeit failed) lawsuits against The Spotlight for the purpose of demolishing the populist weekly. Thus the question remains as to whether Martin was later acting as an agent for the vengeful team of Buckley and Hunt in assisting other operatives who were working to silence The Spotlight. 
The bottom line: Malachi Martin’s role in financing a conspiracy to destroy The Spotlight does point toward the origin of that conspiracy, and it is safe to say that Martin was clearly a prime example of The Enemy Within—in this case involved in the subversion of the Roman Catholic Church. The damage done to the church by the revolutionary conclave known as Vatican II may never be undone and the future will remember Malachi Martin as a treacherous Judas Goat of the worst order.

*BETTER KNOWN UNDER HIS TITLE of Pope Paul VI—under which name he implemented the controversial Vatican II “reforms” that re-directed and distorted traditional Roman Catholic doctrine—at a time when Judas Goat Malachi Martin (see accompanying chapter) was acting as an agent inside the Vatican II conference on behalf of Zionist interests. On more than one occasion Montini (above) publicly wore the Freemasonic emblem known as the “ephod,” the symbol worn by Caiaphus, the Jewish High Priest who ordered the death of Jesus Christ. Montini’s ephod can be seen (circled) at the bottom of his portrait. At right is an ephod in which Hebrew letters can clearly be seen at the top. Said to be of Jewish extraction, Montini was buried Jewish-style, in a plain wooden box, in a ceremony at the Vatican which featured not a single crucifix. Many traditionalist Catholics consider Montini a Judas Goat. Zionist interests have also forcefully infiltrated Protestant fundamentalist churches, promoting the “dispensationalist” doctrine, first cooked up by John Darby in the 1840’s and then widely promoted in the 20th century by Cyrus Scofield, whose famous “Scofield Reference Bible” was financed by the Zionist Rothschild family-funded Oxford University Press in London. Today, Rothschild-sponsored “dispensationalism” dictates the pro-Zionist stance of the so-called “Christian Right,” a major influence in the Republican Party. Thus, an alliance between Radical Judaism and Radical Christianity is responsible for the misconduct of U.S. foreign policy for the benefit of the Zionist imperium under President George W. Bush, a fervent disciple of dispensationalism surrounded by Zionist fanatics.



Sur ce blog:

Jérusalem occupée par l'anti-Christ

Du meurtre du Christ au conflit des civilisations

Ce qu'ils ont dit: Les Papes


Aveugle synagogue

Adrien Arcand

De la séparation