mercredi 4 juillet 2012

Du mythe des "nazis pro-Israël" et de ceux qui voient des complots partout...


Exemple de fantasme conspirationniste de naïfs et/ou menteurs: Hitler en ambassadeur du judaïsme sioniste
De nombreux conspirationnistes s'en donnent à coeur joie à amalgamer nazisme et sionisme et à proclamer que les nazis étaient sionistes et vice versa. Certains par exemple voudraient faire croire que le mot nazi vient de National Sioniste alors qu'il vient clairement de "national-socialiste" comme Sozi vient de "socialiste"! (C'est le cas d'Eustace Mullins, qui a tendance à dire ce que les gens veulent entendre et qui croit les foutaises d'Eric Jon Phelps, auteur de Vatican Assassins, sur le complot jésuite.) Le traître faux révisionniste Mark Weber a contribué à cette tendance avec certains articles qui reprennent, entre autre chose, le mythe entourant une pièce commémorant le voyage d'un dignitaire nazi en Palestine sioniste. Jim Condit admet avoir emprunté à "Ratisbone" (un Polonais catholique anti-nazi Dr Paul Reznowski) plus de 95% de ce qu'il dit dans son vidéo sur Hitler et Israël. Or cette pièce n'est qu'une publicité pour un article de journal, et le politicien nazi qui a fait ce voyage a vu son étoile décliner rapidement. (Dans ce MP3, Condit Jr est confronté à un détracteur de sa vidéo "The Final Solution ot Adolf Hitler".)

Quant à l'Accord de Transfert, qui fait l'objet d'un traitement des plus sensationnaliste, les comptes-rendus les plus honnêtes sont ceux de Lenni Brenner, de Udo Walendy et Ingrid Weckert (mentionnée à cette émission de Spingola Speaks avec Veronica Clark). L'accord a pris fin en 1936, trois ans avant le début de la guerre, et cela a mis un terme définitif aux rapports entre les entités sionistes et les nazis.

Les fausses représentations éructées par des gens tels Edwin Black et Jim Condit concernant l'accord de transfert sont démontées ici. Pour plus de détails sérieux sur ce que fut vraiment l'accord du Haavara.


A coin with two sides




(...) Boas's article described how Baron Leopold Itz von Mildenstein, a member of the Nazi party and of Hitler's SS, set out in the Spring of 1933, accompanied by his wife and Kurt Tuchler, an official of the Zionist Federation of Germany, also with his wife, on a journey to Palestine.
Hitler had just become Chancellor, and begun his anti-Jewish policies. Julius Streicher wanted to drive the Jews out of Germany. But the Nazis were not clear about how they intended to set about this without disrupting the already Depression-beset German economy, and nor did they know what the effects might be on Germany's relations with the rest of the world.

The Zionists, for their part, were enjoying an upsurge of support among German Jews after Hitler took office in January 1933. Most had seen little point before in leaving a country where they were well-established to take their chances in poor and troubled Palestine. They saw themselves as good Germans whose future, like so much of their past, was in the Fatherland. But now Hitler was telling them otherwise.

The Juedische Rundschaue, fortnightly paper of the Zionist Federation, saw its circulation climb from less than 10,000 to almost 38,500 by the end of 1933. It declared that only those whose commitment to the Jewish people was beyond reproach could defend Jewish rights. It also said that only the Zionists were capable of approaching the Nazis in good faith as "honest partners".

The Zionists proposed that the status of German Jews be regulated on a group basis, and asked for government help towards emigration. Von Mildenstein, approached to write something favourable about Zionism and its project in Palestine, agreed on condition that he could make a visit, accompanied by Kurt Tuchler. He was favourably impressed, and saw advantages for Germany, as well as for the SS as proposers of a policy.

A series of article entitled "Ein Nazi faehrt nach Palestina" began in September 1934 in Der Angriff, Goebbels' newspaper. It ran for twelve parts. Von Mildenstein saw in the Jewish settlement on the land a form of rebirth fitting Nazi notions about blood and soil, as well as a way of ridding Germany of Jews. But life was difficult in Palestine, and problems were looming, in Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist colonisation and British rule.

Though the SS gave privileges to Zionists over other Jewish groups, assisting their youth movements, and giving them the right to wear uniform and fly the blue and white flag, Von Mildenstein's own star faded amid rivalries and policy failures, while a man he had brought into the Jewish department came to the fore, one Adolf Eichmann.

But while Von Mildenstein was influencing policy, Der Angriff had a medal struck to commemorate his voyage to Palestine, a medal with the Nazi swastika on one side and the Star of David on the other. (...)

Now I am grateful to Lenni Brenner for sending a picture of a solid reminder of the past. He writes that John Sigler, an anti-Zionist Jew, has found one of Goebbels' medals, struck to commemorate Von Mildenstein's trip.

"John bought his medal from a respected coin dealer. It's about 1.5" in diameter and was originally in bronze. It is thicker than a coin. The photo is of a silvered bronze. (Silvered medals are common.).

The Star of David side inscription reads: EIN NAZI FÄHRT NACH PALÄSTINA -- A Nazi Travels to Palestine. The Swastika side inscription is UND ERZÄHLT DAVON IM Angriff -- And tells about it in the Angriff". (...)





"Les sionistes juifs ont secrètement manipulé l'anti-Juif Hitler"
bel exemple de gros mensonge!
(On est plus facilement berné par un gros mensonge que par un petit, donc plus c'est gros mieux ça passe.)

On partit à cet égard de ce principe très juste que, du plus grand des mensonges, l'on croit toujours une certaine partie : la grande masse du peuple laisse en effet plus facilement corrompre les fibres les plus profondes de son cœur qu'elle ne se lancera, volontairement et consciemment, dans le mal : aussi, dans la simplicité primitive de ses sentiments, sera-t-elle plus facilement victime d'un grand mensonge que d'un petit. Elle ne commet elle-même, en général, que de petits mensonges, tandis qu'elle aurait trop de honte à en commettre de grands.
  Elle ne pourra pas concevoir une telle fausseté et elle ne pourra pas croire, même chez d'autres, à la possibilité de ces fausses interprétations, d'une impudence inouïe : même si on l'éclaire, elle doutera, hésitera longtemps et, tout au moins, elle admettra encore pour vraie une explication quelconque qui lui aura été proposée.  Qu'il reste toujours quelque chose des plus impudents mensonges, c'est un fait que les plus grands artistes en tromperie et que les associations de trompeurs ne connaissent que trop bien et qu'ils emploient dès lors bassement. (Adolf Hitler, Mon combat)







Extrait du chapitre 3 ("Zionism is Judaism: The Foundation for a Global Jewish Imperium") du livre de Michael Collins Piper: THE NEW BABYLON: Those Who Reign Supreme.

Pour le moment, cependant, nous devons faire une digression critique, en explorant la relation largement discutée entre l'Allemagne nazie et le mouvement sioniste. Cela a fait l'objet d'une telle quantité de mésinformation et de désinformation délibérée, propagée la plupart du temps par des gens bien intentionnés qui n'ont rien saisi de l' «image d'ensemble».

Tandis que certains ont souligné à juste titre que -- pendant les premières années du régime nazi d'Adolf Hitler à tout le moins -- le gouvernement allemand a collaboré avec des éléments du mouvement sioniste en Allemagne et ailleurs, ce point reste très mal compris, mal interprété.

Certaines personnes plus naïves et impressionnables ont déclaré que c'était la preuve que "Hitler était un sioniste" et que l'objectif central derrière la création du Troisième Reich était de conduire à la Shoah, pour qu'ensuite l'état sioniste puisse naître des cendres des morts. C'est une thèse bien vivante, mais qui résulte surtout d'une forte imagination couplée à un engrenage fantastique et fantaisiste d'une grande variété de forces et d'événements, pas nécessairement reliés entre eux, tombant en place l'un après l'autre pour réaliser l'objectif final: un État sioniste.

Bien qu'effectivement le régime national-socialiste en Allemagne ait d'abord formé des liens de collaboration ténus avec les sionistes en Europe et en Palestine, voyant cela comme un moyen idéal pour convaincre et pousser les Juifs à quitter l'Europe, ces liens se sont généralement désintégrés, pendant que les Allemands se rendaient à l'évidence, en temps de guerre, que la collaboration avec les Arabes antisionistes en Afrique du Nord et au Moyen-Orient était beaucoup plus productive et profitable aux objectifs allemands. Alors, bien qu'il soit vrai que les Allemands ont collaboré avec les sionistes, cette affaire a été largement exagérée par des gens qui ne veulent pas ou qui sont tout simplement incapables de voir l'image géopolitique d'ensemble -- autrement plus importante.

Remarquons également que nombre de ceux qui ont adopté la position selon laquelle "Hitler était un sioniste" ont souvent tendance à être des individus -- aussi bien intentionnés qu'ils soient -- qui évoquent cet argument afin de "prouver" qu'ils ne sont pas «anti-sémite», comme pour dire "Eh bien, même si je suis un critique d'Israël, je ne suis pas «comme Hitler», puisque, après tout, c'est Hitler qui a contribué à créer l'État d'Israël."

Ceux qui disent cela ne parviennent pas à comprendre que l'élite du pouvoir juif et le mouvement sioniste se moquent de cette prise de position et considèrent toute personne qui ne ferait même que flirter avec cette théorie comme étant tout aussi mauvaise que ceux et celles qui sont des critiques ouverts, purs et simples, d'Israël, du sionisme et de l'agenda juif.

Les études les plus responsables sur la collaboration allemande-sioniste se trouvent dans les ouvrages de Lenni Brenner, un marxiste américain né juif orthodoxe, dont les ouvrages 'Zionism in the Age of Dictators' et son plus tardif '51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With The Nazis', remettent correctement la question dans son contexte. Cela n'a pas empêché les sensationnalistes de tordre la vérité.

Il y a aussi la légende selon laquelle "les banquiers juifs" ou "les banquiers sionistes" (expressions souvent utilisées interchangeablement) auraient financé Hitler. Cela n'est pas vrai.

James Pool, dans son ouvrage faisant autorité 'Who Financed Hitler?' démontre le contraire.

Certes, un financier juif en Allemagne a donné de l'argent au parti nazi -- avant la montée au pouvoir d'Adolf Hitler -- mais ces fonds étaient destinés à aider l'opposition anti-Hitler à l'intérieur du parti, afin de stopper Hitler. Mais en dépit de ce fait, certains «patriotes» prétendent encore que "les Juifs ont soutenu Hitler".

Plusieurs parmi ceux qui croient en de tels non-sens citent un document qui est un fraude flagrante d'origine obscure intitulé 'Hitler's Secret Backers', soi-disant écrit par un certain "Sidney Warburg", l'un de ces "banquiers juifs." Mais ce document, comme nous l'avons dit, est une fraude.

Le livre 'Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler', de feu Dr. Antony Sutton, fait la promotion de cette théorie basée en partie sur le canular Warburg, et contribué à établir ce mythe durablement -- au plus grand mépris de la vérité.

Des banques et des sociétés américaines ont effectivement travaillé avec le régime hitlérien, le plus souvent dans la suite des arrangements financiers remontant à des décennies, mais il cela ne faisait partie d'aucune conspiration pour mettre Hitler au pouvoir. L'affirmation selon laquelle la famille Bush aurait contribué à la montée d'Hitler est un autre mythe.

Kevin Phillips -- nullement un admirateur de la dynastie des Bush -- examine les circonstances réelles entourant le scénario Bush-Hitler dans son livre, 'Americain Dynasty: Aristocraty, Fortune, And The Politics of Deceit In The House Of Bush', et les met en perspective.

Une autre affirmation insensée -- selon laquelle Hitler et la plupart des dirigeants nazis étaient en fait Juifs ou en partie juifs -- a son origine principale dans un travail quasi impénétrable et tout à fait bizarre intitulé 'Adolf Hitler: Founder of Israel'.

Malheureusement, à l'âge de l'Internet, ce volume, dont la plupart de ceux qui le citent ne l'ont jamais réellement lu, a été largement vanté, même par une poignée d'âmes autrement responsables qui veulent croire, semble-t-il, que Hitler faisait partie du "complot juif."

Un écrivain de talent américain, Martin Kerr, a produit une étude faisant autorité, "Le mythe du grand-père juif d'Hitler", disponible sur Internet, qui examine toutes les théories et les méandres sur ce sujet et démolit complètement cette théorie. Mais, encore une fois, cela n'empêche pas les sensationnalistes de dire "ça doit être vrai: Hitler était un Juif et un sioniste."

Bien que tout ceci ait été une digression saillante, elle était nécessaire, précisément parce qu'il circule énormément de mésinformation et de désinformation délibérée, sur Internet et dans des ouvrages divers parus au cours du dernier demi-siècle, au sujet des relations entre les nazis d'Adolf Hitler et l'agenda sioniste et juif.

Alors, malheureusement, afin de remettre l'histoire en accord avec les faits, il est essentiel de répondre à toutes ces sornettes.

Pour mémoire -- reprenons le cours de notre analyse du sionisme et du judaïsme (en lien avec ce que nous connaissons aujourd'hui comme le Nouvel Ordre Mondial). On notera d'abord ceci: la vérité est que, au fil des années, il y a eu de nombreuses personnes -- dont certaines ouvertement anti-juives -- qui ont vu une certaine sagesse dans le sionisme en général.

Autrement dit, ils ont vu le départ des Juifs hors de leur pays et la concentration de la population juive dans un état appartenant à tous les Juifs (mais pas nécessairement en terre palestinienne arabe) comme un moyen de résoudre enfin le conflit séculaire entre les Juifs et tous les autres.

En 1922, Théodore Fritsch, un écrivain allemand anti-juif bien connu, reconnaissait son admiration pour l'idéologie sioniste:

Nous considérons toujours les sionistes comme les plus honnêtes des Juifs, parce qu'ils admettent. . . qu'il ne peut y avoir de mélange avec les populations non-juives, que les diverses races se dérangent mutuellement dans leur développement et leur culture. Nous demandons donc avec les sionistes "une séparation claire" et la fondation d'un dominion exclusivement juif. . . .

Dans la même veine, en 1921, l'auteur français Georges Batault a écrit dans Le problème juif:

Si le peuple juif reconstitué souhaite se classer en tant que nation parmi les nations, alors il est du devoir et de l'intérêt de chacun de l'aider à le faire. S'il envisage, au contraire, de s'organiser au niveau international afin de ruiner et de dominer les nations, alors il est du devoir de ces dernières de se lever et de l'en interdire.

Toutefois, Batault reconnaissait que, en définitive, les enseignements juifs professent que les Juifs en viendront à gouverner la terre dans son intégralité:

Et quant au résultat final de la révolution messianique, il sera toujours le même; Dieu renversera les rois et fera triompher Israël et son roi; les nations seront converties au judaïsme et obéiront à la loi, ou bien seront détruites et les Juifs seront maîtres du monde.

En France, durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il y avait une vaste opposition à l'influence juive, non seulement dans le régime de Vichy dans le sud de la France, un régime indépendant qui a collaboré avec l'Allemagne nazie, mais également même dans la zone occupée par les Allemands dans le Nord de la France.

(Parenthèse intéressante: beaucoup de gens aujourd'hui, en particulier des Américains mal informés, voient la France de Vichy comme les "méchants" qui étaient "antisémites" et la France occupée par les Allemands comme les "bons gars" qui "détestaient les nazis et s'opposaient à leurs vues antisémites", cependant la vérité est que l'opposition au pouvoir juif et à l'influence juive était très répandue dans toute la France et cela malgré toutes les légendes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale.)

En tout état de cause, un écrivain a parlé de ces préoccupations chez les Français, c'est Gabriel Malglaive, dont le livre 'Juif ou Français?' publié en 1942, explique quelles ont été les mesures prises dans la France de Vichy afin de limiter le pouvoir juif. Il dit que ces mesures visaient quatre objectifs principaux:

1. Résolument exclure les Juifs du gouvernement. . . . Ce fut la première tâche et relativement la plus simple, car cela ne concernait seulement qu'un petit nombre. . . ;
2. Combattre leur influence intellectuelle, combattre tout appui à leur intrusion dans l'État et toute extension de celle-ci, et les exclure à cette fin des professions libérales, de l'enseignement, de la presse, etc;
3. Éliminer leur suprématie "économique et financière", leur prépondérance dans tous les domaines de l'industrie, du commerce, du marché boursier et des banques, c'est-à-dire déjudaïser ce domaine qui avait été le leur. Agir de telle manière à ce qu'ils ne tiennent plus le pouvoir de l'argent, le plus redoutable, car s'ils l'avaient gardé, ils auraient conservé en pratique tous les autres pouvoirs;
4. Finalement éliminer leur pouvoir occulte en les tenant éloignés des corporations et sociétés, en purgeant. . . la presse et les agences à travers lesquelles ils ont établi une propagande rusée et [leur] censure de facto. . .

En fin de compte, écrit-il, ce que lui et tant d'autres ont considéré comme "le problème juif" appelle à une "solution juive." Ironie du sort, dit Malglaive, à l'avenir les grandes puissances du monde, y compris même le peuple juif, seront forcés de reconnaître "l'existence de la nation juive", et par conséquent de délimiter un territoire qui serait remis à la nation juive.

Ceci, bien sûr, correspond en fait à ce que nous connaissons aujourd'hui comme "le sionisme". Le résultat serait, dit Malglaive, que dès lors, "tous les Juifs du monde posséderont légalement et officiellement la nationalité juive que leurs cœurs ont toujours secrètement réclamé." La question, conclu-t-il, est de savoir "si souhaitant régler le problème humainement nous voulons cesser d'être provoqués par les Juifs, ou si, en continuant ainsi à prendre des demi-mesures, nous nous résignons à un règlement partiel et donc malheureux de cette question".



V.O.A.:
"For the moment, however, we must make a critical digression, to explore the much-discussed relationship between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement. This has been the subject of so much misinformation and deliberate disinformation, much of it spread by well-meaning folks who don’t understand the “big picture.”
While there are those who have correctly pointed out that—during the early years of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler—the German government actually collaborated with elements of the Zionist movement in Germany and elsewhere, this point has been largely misunderstood and misconstrued.
Some more naive and excitable folks have declared this to be proof that “Hitler was a Zionist”and that the entire purpose of the creation of the Third Reich was setting in place the Holocaust so that a Zionist state could emerge from the ashes of the dead. This is quite a lively thesis, but one which essentially relies on a lot of imagination coupled with a fantastic and fanciful dependence upon a wide variety of forces and events—not necessarily connected—falling into place in order to achieve the final goal: a Zionist state.
While the National Socialist regime in Germany did initially form some loose collaborative efforts with Zionists in Europe and Palestine, seeing this as an ideal way to convince and persuade Jews to leave Europe, these ties generally disintegrated as the Germans recognized, during wartime, that collaboration with the anti-Zionist Arabs in North Africa and the Middle East was far more productive for German goals. So while there is truth that the Germans did collaborate with the Zionists, the matter has been largely overstated by persons who are unwilling or simply incapable of looking at the much-larger—and far more important—geopolitical picture.
Let it also be said that many of those who have adopted the stance that “Hitler was a Zionist” often tend to be individuals—however well-meaning they may be—who use that term to “prove” that they aren’t “anti-Semitic,” as if to say “Well, even though I’m a critic of Israel, I’m not ‘like Hitler’ since, after all, it was Hitler who helped bring about the state of Israel.”
Those who tout this line fail to understand that the Jewish Power Elite and the Zionist movement scoff at this stance and consider anyone who even flirts with this theory to be just as bad as those others who are outright, open critics of Israel, Zionism and the Jewish agenda.
The most responsible studies of German-Zionist collaboration can be found in the work of Lenni Brenner, an Orthodox Jewish-born American Marxist, whose Zionism in the Age of the Dictators and his later volume, 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis, correctly put the matter in context. This has not stopped sensationalists from twisting the truth.
There is also the legend that “The Jewish bankers” or “The Zionist bankers” (used often interchangeably) financed Hitler. Not true.
James Pool, in his authoritative work, Who Financed Hitler? demonstrates quite the contrary.
In one instance a Jewish financier in Germany did give money to the Nazi Party—prior to the rise to power of Adolf Hitler—but those funds were designed to help Hitler’s intra-party opposition, to stop Hitler. But despite this fact, some “patriots” still say that “The Jews backed Hitler.”
Many of those who worship at the altar of this nonsense cite a flagrantly-fraudulent document of shadowy origins entitled Hitler’s Secret Bankers, ostensibly written by one “Sidney Warburg,” one of those “Jewish bankers.” But this document, as we’ve said, is a fraud.

The late Dr. Antony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler has promoted this theory, based in part on the Warburg travesty and has given further institutionalization to this mythology—the truth be damned.

American banks and corporations did work with the Hitler regime, usually a continuation of previous financial arrangements going back decades, but this was not part of any grand conspiracy to bring Hitler to power. The claim that the Bush family was integral to the rise of Hitler is another myth.
Kevin Phillips—no admirer of the Bush dynasty—examines the actual circumstances surrounding the Bush-Hitler scenario in his book, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush and puts the facts in proper perspective.
Another nonsensical claim—that Hitler and most of the top Nazis were actually Jews or part Jewish—has its primary origin in a virtually impenetrable and quite bizarre work entitled Adolf Hitler: Founder of Israel.
Sadly, in the age of the Internet, this volume, which most of those who quote it have never actually read, has been widely touted, even by a handful of otherwise responsible souls who want to believe, it appears, that Hitler was part of “the Jewish conspiracy.”
A talented American writer, Martin Kerr, has written an authoritative study,“The Myth of Hitler’s Jewish Grandfather,” which can be found on the Internet, which examines all of the theories and meanderings on this topic and lays the theory to rest. But, again, that doesn’t stop the sensationalists from saying “it must be true: Hitler was a Jew and a Zionist.”
While all of this has been a distinct digression, it’s been a necessary one, precisely because there is so much misinformation and deliberate disinformation regarding the relationship between Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and the Zionist and Jewish agenda that has littered the Internet and published works throughout the last half century.
So, unfortunately, in order to bring history into accord with the facts, it is critical to address the nonsense.
For the record, let us return to our course of analysis—the issue of Zionism and Judaism (vis-a-vis what we know today as the New World Order). And we shall note this: the truth is that, over the years, there have been many people—admittedly anti-Jewish—who saw some wisdom in Zionism generally.
That is, they saw the departure of Jews from their lands and the concentration of the Jewish population in a state all the Jews own (although not necessarily in Arab Palestine) as a means of finally resolving the age-old conflict between the Jews and all others.
In 1922, Theodore Fritsch, a well known German anti-Jewish writer, actually acknowledged his admiration for Zionist ideology:
We still consider the Zionists as the most honest of Jews, because they admit that . . . there be no amalgamation with the non-Jewish people, that the diverse races moreover mutually disturb each other in their development and culture. We therefore demand together with the Zionists“a clean separation” and the settlement of a Jews-only dominion. . . .
In a similar vein, in 1921, French author Georges Batault wrote in The Jewish Problem:
If the reconstituted Jewish people wishes to rank itself as a nation among the nations, then it is the duty and the interest of each one to help it to do so. If it contemplates, on the contrary, organizing itself internationally in order to ruin and dominate the nations, then it is the duty of the latter to rise up and forbid it.
However, Batault recognized that, ultimately, Jewish teachings taught that the Jews would come to rule the earth in its entirety:
As for the final result of the Messianic revolution, it will always be the same; God will overthrow the kings and will cause Israel and its king to triumph; the nations will be converted to Judaism, and will obey the law or else they will be destroyed and the Jews will be the masters of the world.
In France, during World War II, there was widespread opposition to Jewish influence, not only in the Vichy Regime in Southern France, an independent regime which collaborated with Nazi Germany, but likewise even in the German occupied area of Northern France.
(Note this interesting aside: Many people today, especially un-learned Americans, perceive Vichy France to be the “bad guys” who were “anti-Semitic” and German Occupied France to be the“good guys”who“hated the Nazis and opposed their anti-Semitic point of view” but the truth is that opposition to Jewish power and influence was widespread throughout all of France, the legends of World War II notwithstanding.)
In any event, one writer who spoke about these concerns among the French was Gabriel Malglaive, whose book Jewish or French? published in 1942, discussed measures taken in Vichy France designed to curtail Jewish power. He said there were four principal aims underlying these measures:
1. Resolutely to separate the Jews from the government . . . . That was the first task and relatively the simplest, because it envisaged only a small number. . . ;
2. To combat their intellectual influence,support and extensionof their intrusion into the state; to separate them, to this end, from the liberal professions, from teaching, from the press, etc;
3. To eliminate their “economic and financial” supremacy, their preponderance in all branches of industry, commerce, the stock market and the banks, that is, to de-Judaize this realm which had been theirs. To act in such a manner that they would no longer retain the power of money, the most fearful one, for if they had kept it, they would have, in practice, conserved all the others;
4. To eliminate, finally, their occult power by keeping them away from corporations, by purifying . . . the press and agencies through which they established a cunning ropaganda and [their] de facto censorship . . . .
In the end, he wrote, that what he and so many others considered “the Jewish Problem” would have to be given what he called a “Jewish Solution.” Ironically, Malglaive said, in the future the great powers of the world, even including the Jewish people,would be forced to recognize “the existence of the Jewish nation” and therefore assign a territory which would be turned over to the Jewish nation.
This, of course, is, in fact, what we today know of as “Zionism.” The result would be, said Malglaive, that from then on,“all of the Jews of the world will possess legally, officially, the Jewish nationality which their hearts have always secretly chosen.”The issue, he concluded, was “whether wishing to settle the problem humanely we want to cease being provoked by the Jews, or whether, continuing to apply half-measures,we resign ourselves to a partial and thus poor settlement of this Question.”"




« Qui donc a mis comme ça Rothschild sous les verrous ? pour spéculations ? C’est pas Schussnig, c’est pas Cachin, c’est pas Jouhaux, c’est pas Blum, c’est pas Chamberlain, c’est pas Staline, c’est Hitler. 
Quel est le véritable ennemi du capitalisme ? C’est le fascisme. Le communisme est un truc de Juif, un moyen d’asservir le peuple plus vachement encore, absolument à l’oeil. 
Quel est le véritable ami du peuple ? Le Fascisme. 
Qui a le plus fait pour l’ouvrier ? L’U.R.S.S. ou Hitler ?C’est Hitler. 
Y a qu’à regarder sans merde rouge plein les yeux. 
Qui a fait le plus pour le petit commerçant ? C’est pas Thorez, c’est Hitler ! 
Qui nous préserve de la Guerre ? C’est Hitler ! 
Les communistes (juifs ou enjuivés), ne pensent qu’à nous envoyer à la bute, à nous faire crever en Croisades. 
Hitler est un bon éleveur de peuples, il est du côté de la Vie, il est soucieux de la vie des peuples, et même de la nôtre. C’est un Aryen. » -- Céline, l’école des cadavres , 1938




Du mythe voulant qu'Hitler ait été sioniste



« Une partie de sa race se reconnaît ouvertement pour un peuple étranger, non sans d’ailleurs commettre un nouveau mensonge. (…) Ils ( les sionistes ) n’ont pas du tout l’intention d’édifier en Palestine un État juif pour aller s’y fixer ; ils ont simplement en vue d’y établir l’organisation centrale de leur entreprise charlatanesque d’internationalisme universel ; elle serait ainsi douée de droits de souveraineté et soustraite à l’intervention des autres États ; elle serait un lieu d’asile pour tous les gredins démasqués et une école supérieure pour les futurs bateleurs. » (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf)



Discours du Führer devant le Reichstag, 28 avril 1939:

"Mais je dois aussi attirer l'attention de M. Roosevelt sur une ou deux erreurs dans l'histoire. Il mentionne l’Irlande, par exemple, et demande une déclaration à l'effet que l'Allemagne n'attaquera pas l'Irlande. Maintenant, je viens de lire un discours prononcé par M. de Valera, le Premier ministre Irlandais, curieusement, et contrairement à l'opinion de M. Roosevelt, il n’accuse pas l’Allemagne d’opprimer l'Irlande, mais reproche à l'Angleterre de soumettre l'Irlande à une agression continue.

     Avec tout le respect dû à M. Roosevelt et à sa compréhension des besoins et des soucis des autres pays, on peut néanmoins supposer que le Premier ministre irlandais connaît mieux que le président des États-Unis quels sont les dangers qui menacent son propre pays.

     De même, le fait a évidemment échappé à l'attention de M. Roosevelt que la Palestine est actuellement occupée non par les troupes allemandes, mais par les Anglais, et que le pays voit sa liberté restreinte par le recours à la force la plus brutale, est dépouillé de son indépendance et souffre des mauvais traitements les plus cruels au profit des intrus juifs. (...)

     Les Arabes vivant dans ce pays ne se seraient donc certainement pas plaints à M. Roosevelt de l'agression allemande, mais ils expriment devant le monde un appel constant, déplorant les méthodes barbares par lesquelles l'Angleterre tente de réprimer un peuple qui aime sa liberté et ne fait simplement que la défendre.

     Cela, aussi, est peut-être un problème qui, de l'avis du président américain, devrait être résolu à la table de conférence, c’est-à-dire, devant un juge juste, et non par la force physique ou des méthodes militaires, par des exécutions de masse, en brûlant des villages, en faisant sauter des maisons et ainsi de suite.

     Car un fait est sûrement certain. Dans ce cas-ci, l'Angleterre n'est en train de se défendre contre la menace d’une attaque arabe, mais comme un intrus qui n’a pas été invité, elle tente d'établir son pouvoir sur un territoire étranger qui ne lui appartient pas "

Version anglaise: "But I must also draw Mr. Roosevelt's attention to one or two mistakes in history. He mentions Ireland, for instance, and asks for a statement to the effect that Germany will not attack Ireland. Now, I have just read a speech delivered by Mr. de Valera, the Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister), in which strangely enough, and contrary to Mr. Roosevelt's opinion, he does not charge Germany with oppressing Ireland, but reproaches England with subjecting Ireland to continuous aggression.

With all due respect to Mr. Roosevelt's insight into the needs and cares of other countries, it may nevertheless be assumed that the Irish Taoiseach would be more familiar with the dangers which threaten his country than would the President of the United States.

Similarly the fact has obviously escaped Mr. Roosevelt's notice that Palestine is at present occupied not by German troops but by the English; and that the country is undergoing restriction of its liberty by the most brutal resort to force, is being robbed of its independence and is suffering the cruelest maltreatment for the benefit of Jewish interlopers. (...)

The Arabs living in that country would therefore certainly not have complained to Mr. Roosevelt of German aggression, but they are voicing a constant appeal to the world, deploring the barbarous methods with which England is attempting to suppress a people which loves its freedom and is merely defending it.

This, too, is perhaps a problem which in the American President's view should be solved at the conference table, that is, before a just judge, and not by physical force or military methods, by mass executions, burning down villages, blowing up houses and so on.

For one fact is surely certain. In this case England is not defending herself against a threatened Arab attack, but as an uninvited interloper, is endeavoring to establish her power in a foreign territory which does not belong to her"



Notre point de vue sur la question juive est la suivante : la prise de position de l’Amérique et de l’Angleterre quant aux juifs ne nous intéresse d’aucune façon. Ce qui est clair, c’est que nous ne voulons pas les avoir en Allemagne et dans le domaine de vie allemand en raison des décennies d’expérience après la [première] guerre mondiale et que nous n’engagerons aucune discussion à ce sujet. Si l’Amérique veut les prendre, nous nous en féliciterons. Mais il doit être exclu, et là-dessus une garantie devra nous être donnée, que les juifs que nous laisserons sortir par la Suisse puissent jamais être refoulés vers la Palestine. Nous savons que les Arabes, tout autant que nous Allemands le faisons, refusent les juifs et nous ne voulons pas nous prêter à une indécence telle que d’envoyer de nouveaux juifs à ce pauvre peuple martyrisé par les juifs.” (18.1.1945 MF/Bn. Heinrich Himmler; Document de l’US-Document-Center Berlin. Photographie dans Werner Maser, Nürnberg, Tribunal der Sieger, Droemer Knauer, München-Zürich, 1979, p. 262-263)


"Je suis persuadé que les Japonais, les Chinois et les peuples régis par l'Islam seront toujours plus proches de nous que la France, par exemple, en dépit de la parenté du sang qui coule dans nos veines. Le malheur veut que la France ait dégénéré au cours des siècles et que ses élites aient été subverties par l'esprit juif. Cela a pris de telles proportions que cela est irréparable. La France est condamnée à faire une politique juive." (Testament politique d'Hitler, Adolf Hitler, notes de Martin Bormann, préface de Trevor-Roper, éd. Fayard, 1959, 2 avril 1945, p. 180)
I am sure that the Japanese, the Chinese and the peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France, in spite of the fact that we are related by blood. It is a tragedy that France has consistently degenerated in the course of centuries and that her upper classes have been perverted by the Jews. France is now condemned to the pursuit of a Jewish policy. (The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, April 2, 1945)

"Only in the Roman Empire and in Spain under Arab domination has culture been a potent factor. Under the latter, the standard of civilisation attained was wholly admirable; to Spain flocked the greatest scientists, thinkers, astronomers and mathematicians of the world, and side by side there flourished a spirit of sweet human tolerance and a sense of the purest chivalry. Then, with the advent of Christianity, came the barbarians. The chivalry of the Castilians has been inherited from the Arabs. Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers — already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity! — then we should in all probabihty have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so." (HITLER'S TABLE TALK, August 27, 1941)

La civilisation a été l’un des éléments constitutifs de la puissance de l’Empire romain. Ce fut aussi le cas en Espagne, sous la domination des Arabes. La civilisation atteignit là un degré qu’elle a rarement atteint. Vraiment une époque d’humanisme intégral, où régna le plus pur esprit chevaleresque. L’intrusion du christianisme a amené le triomphe de la barbarie. L’esprit chevaleresque des Castillans est en réalité un héritage des Arabes. Si à Poitiers Charles Martel avait été battu, la face du monde eût changé. Puisque le monde était déjà voué à l'influence judaïque (et son produit, le christianisme, est une chose si fade!) il eût beauicoup mieux valu que le mahométisme triomphât. Cette religion récompense l'héroïsme, elle promet aux guerriers les joies du septième ciel... Animés par un tel esprit, les Germains eussent conquis le monde. C'est le christianisme qui les en a empêchés.  (Libres propos sur la guerre et la paix recueillis sur l’ordre de Martin Bormann, Adolf Hitler, éd. Flammarion, 1954, 28 août 1942, p. 297)

"L’image que Hitler se faisait de l’Église officielle apparaissait clairement dans ces propos que lui aurait tenus une délégation de notabilités arabes et dont il faisait sans cesse état. Quand, au VIIIe siècle, auraient déclaré ces visiteurs, les musulmans avaient voulu envahir l’Europe centrale en passant par la France, ils avaient été battus à la bataille de Poitiers. Si les Arabes avaient gagné cette bataille, le monde entier serait aujourd’hui musulman. Il sauraient en effet imposé aux peuples germaniques une religion dont le dogme, propager la foi par l’épée et soumettre tous les peuples à cette foi, était comme fait pour les Germains. Par suite de leur infériorité raciale, les conquérants n’auraient pu se maintenir contre les indigènes plus vigoureux et habitués à la rudesse de cette nature où ils avaient grandi, si bien que, pour finir, ce ne sont pas les Arabes mais les Germains, convertis à la foi musulmane, qui auraient été à la tête de cet empire mondial islamique. Hitler avait l’habitude de conclure ce récit par la considération suivante : « Nous avons la malchance de ne pas posséder la bonne religion. Pourquoi n’avons-nous pas la religion des Japonais, pour qui se sacrifier à sa patrie est le bien suprême ? La religion musulmane aussi serait bien plus appropriée que ce christianisme, avec sa tolérance amollissante." (Au coeur du Troisième Reich, Albert Speer)

Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was pedectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire. Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: "You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?" (Inside the Third Reich, Albert Speer)







Écouter le MP3 où Jim Condit Jr est confronté à un détracteur de sa vidéo "The Final Solution ot Adolf Hitler"

The Continuing False Statements of Jim Condit, Jr


By Carolyn Yeager, Dec. 16, 2012
Ken Hoop has sent me an exchange of 5 emails between himself and Jim Condit, Jr. (pictured right), under the subject line: RE: Yeager
I have never met Ken but I thank him for giving me the opportunity to refute once again Condit's childish repetition (maybe stemming from his characteristic blindness) that, when debating with him and about him, I "NEVER ONCE gave a reason why a source (of his) was illegitimate." Here is part of the email exchange:
From: Ken Hoop
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:07 PM
To: jconditjr
Subject: Yeager
Of course when you quote kook sources to substantiate kook positions, Yeager and Irving and Duke and Rudolf and Weber and Faurisson and Butz are going to call you on it.

But then you would have to go back to about when you were 25 and begin to sort out all the kook sources you have adopted as true
on all your kook projects on everything from the Siri kookism on..
From: jconditjr
To: bronson
Subject: RE: Yeager
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:42 -0500

The facts I cite are IN THE PUBLIC RECORD in general --- they are in the MAINSTREAM SOURCES -- but they are either given little or no commentary -- or ABSURD commentary, once you look closely.
 Yeager NEVER ONCE gave a reason why a source was illegitimate.

The truth of the matter is that I spent most of the time alloted to me doing just what he says I didn't do, both on the Deanna Spingola show "debate" between Jim and me (unavailable) and on the Charles Guiliani show wherein I pointed out why Jim's sources were faulty. It is not my fault that Condit simply ignores what I say to him and does not respond to it. For example:
I have said repeatedly that Condit's main source for the info he peddles is Adolf Hitler - Founder of Israel by Hennecke Kardel (copyright 1974), which relies for much of its information on Bevor Hitler Kam (Before Hitler Came) by Jewish schoolteacher Dietrich Bronder, written in 1964.  This latter book, only in German, has the sole intention of putting forth lies and gossip to further the anti-National Socialist agenda of his Jewish brethren. All his claims that the top National Socialists were Jewish I refuted. (Though I didn't have time to complete it on the programs. I will put all that information in a follow up blogpost.)
As to Hennecke Kardel's book, the information on the copyright page reads: Translated by the Oficyna Sydawnicza "Fulmen", Warszawa © Copyright 1996 Fulmen ISBN 83 86445 020 5 and in Poland is already sold out. This introductory edition was translated by the Publisher, Modjeskis' Society Dedicated to Preservation of Cultures, P.O. Box 193, San Diego, CA 92038, © Copyright 1997. Modjeskis' Society ISBN 09657523-0-5 and is also available for distribution under the address of this Society.
I have pointed out that devoted Irish Catholic Jim Condit, Jr. has a strong affinity with Polish Catholics, some of the most faithful Catholics in Europe, and allies with them in their desire to blacken the name of Adolf Hitler. Condit praises the name of his Polish mentor, the late Dr. Paul Reznowski, who started him out on this path, gave him most of the material he uses, and whom Condit originally called "Ratisbone."
 But what is most important to this particular reply to Jim Condit is that no one has ever found out who Hennecke Kardel is. In searching for that information on the Internet, I came up with only this: http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/269488.Hennecke_Kardel 

Born: June 15, 1922 in Friedrichstadt, Germany
Died: June 24, 2007

Gender: male

Genre: History

About this author: Son of German scientist Rudolf Kardel. After completing Army Academy he served as an infantryman in the German army in Russia and the Balkans. In 1979 he was sued by the German state which also confiscated all his possessions. In 1982 he was acquitted without any expenses pay.
Can anyone verify this information? NO! All that is found are websites copying this unconfirmed item from goodreads.com, where anything can be placed. John Kaminski, of Polish ancestry, writes a column simply using information from this Kardel book, as if it were reliable. He asks no questions. It is my opinion that Hennecke Kardel is a pseudonym for the unknown and unaccountable Polish group that wrote the book. Much of their "information" came from Jew Dietrich Bronders' book, which was never translated into English because it is just a hatchet job. By the way, Bronder was NOT a Professor of History as is sometimes claimed by these fakers, but just an ordinary schoolteacher. After the war, one only had to be a Jew to get bureaucratic jobs with which to carry forward the De-nazification Plan.
More to come.



VIDEO - Red Ice Radio: VKC vs Nazi Conspiracy Theories



VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Mengele Myths and More 

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Hitler HImmler Uncensored  

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Histroian - Hitler in Argentina? 

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Hess, Hitler And Swiss Bankers  

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian And Heink - Evil Nazis, Yanki Polls and Jewzi Emigration

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Anti German Myths And Communist Subversion   






VIDEO -  فلسطين والاشتراكية القوميةPALESTINE ET NATIONAL SOCIALISME





VIDEO - Palestine and other anti-zionist volunters with Axis in ww2


Spingola Speaks 2013.04.10

Guest: Wayne from Canada, Hitler's War - What the Historians Neglect to Mention (video); Hitler’s Shadow – In the Service of The Fuehrer; Senators voted to let the UN take our guns

Deanna's site
News Page
Official chat room

Join Spingola Speaks Email List

Download
No comments: 


  

Zionism and the Third Reich – Was Hitler a Zionist Agent? Did Hitler Create Israel??

This is part 3 in series dealing with the issues concerning Hitler, National Socialist Germany and the Jews. In the first part, I demonstrated that powerful and influential self-described “Jews” in New York and London declared war on Germany in 1933, and launched a world wide economic warfare against her, based upon bogus atrocity stories. In part 2, I showed that the largest and most influential Jewish organization in Germany at the time, publicly stated that these stories were untrue and that they themselves attempted to defend National Socialist Germany against the vile, slanderous atrocity propaganda, and how of their own accord, they took measures to re-assure the world that the atrocity stories were untrue, and moreover, that these stories were doing more harm than good, by fanning anti-Jewish sentiments within Germany. Now let’s turn to the issue of Zionism.
Many in the so-called “truth movement” today claim that Hitler was a Jew and / or a Rothschild, or a Zionist agent, and hence; that was “founder of Israel”. I have already dealt with this in a variety of previous posts and refuted those lies, but let’s look more closely now at the “Zionist agent” allegations. The so-called “Jewish Question” was not something that Hitler invented nor a problem that Hitler alone had perceived of. It was well discussed by Churchill and Roosevelt, and many others in Europe too. Hitler openly acknowledged the problem, which was also acknowledged by the Zionist Jews themselves!
Hitler sought to work with them to bring about a mutually beneficial solution. He did not, however, “ally” himself with the Zionists, as many today claim, but rather acknowledged them as a distinct race and culture, and he negotiated with them honourably, right in the midst of a wave of global Anti-Germanism, created and fanned by self-described “International Jewry”, which I believe was really a just front organization for the International Bankster Gangsters, the very same interests which Hitler decried and attempted to free his people from.
This group were attempting to strangle Germany economically, in the hope that the Hitler’s government would then collapse, return to the status quo: the Weimar “free for all” Republic, and the dictates of the Versailles Treaty,  under which the International Bankster Gangsters could then go back to “business as usual” in bleeding Germany to a slow and painful death. And, thereby removing a real competitor from the world market.  Not to mention leaving her and Europe wide open to the Soviet Bolshevik menace. Thus, the “status quo” was NOT acceptable to the Germans, which is precisely why Hitler and the NSDAP were elected to government and was NOT an option!
No other countries wished to take large numbers of Jews, and no other organization was in place with whom they could negotiate. Hitler’s support for them, however, was limited!
Excerpt from Zionism and The Third Reich, by Mark Weber (IHR)
Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their” governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state… /23″
FULL ARTICLE: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html
The above article by historian Mark Weber is also available as a free podcast here
To further understand the “Transfer Agreement” between NS Germany and the Zionists, I recommend you listen to the following. or download the free booklet and read it for yourself.:


Deanna Spingola reads from the book: The Transfer Agreement Boycott Fever of 1933 by by Professor Udo Walendy. This 40 page booklet goes into all of the pertinent background information regarding the declaration of war against Germany by self-described “World Jewry” or “Judea” , and their global boycott of German goods and services, based upon anti-German propaganda. Their objective was to bring Germany to her knees and to destroy her. They began to implement this plan, under false pretences (pretexts) , as soon as the National Socialists came to power, in order to undermine Hitler and the NS economic rescue plan, and thereby, subvert the democratically expressed will of the German people who had elected his party. It was a “False Flag Operation” of global proportions.

Hitler’s party platform did indeed include an appeal for racial purity in Germany, and the removal of Jews from positions of power and influence, and a return of power to the people.  Even after the Nuremberg Laws were decreed, Jews however, could still make appeals to Hitler directly from exemptions, and he was dealing with these daily until at least late 1942 or early 1943 (well into the war).   It must be noted too that, it was the British who put an end to emigration to Palestine when the war started, leaving any who wished to emigrate to Palestine stranded in Germany and later in transit camps. The western powers also refused to cooperate with Germany  on alternative plans to have the Jews emigrate to locations such as Madagascar.  But not all Jews wanted to leave Germany. Most rather enjoyed living there and wanted to stay.  Approximately 150,000 loyal Jews served in the military and defended National Socialist Germany.  Proven loyalty and devotion to Germany was always the key!  I will cover this in more detail with expert sources at a later date.
It must also be underscored again, however, that Hitler’s support of Jewish immigration to Palestine was NEVER intended to be at the expense of the Palestinians, for whom he had great empathy, and he also worked closely with the Grand Mufti to support their cause, and vice versa.
VIDEO: Hitler speaks on the plight of the Palestinians and of USA and British hypocrisy 1939

In the picture below, the Grand Mufti Husseini meets with Adolf Hitler in Berlin
Grand Mufti and Hitler
The picture below is of National Socialist supporters in Palestine.
Hitler Youth in Palestine
Would this be possible if Hitler was a “Zionist Agent”? Do you think these people considered Hitler as the man responsible for the creation of modern day Israel? Or rather, as their ally?
Before wrapping this up, I will leave you with the following for your further consideration which demonstrates (again) the utter hypocrisy of the “ALL LIES”.  Moreover, I believe it is further evidence of a criminal conspiracy to demonize Hitler and NS Germany for the sake of a profitable war, and for the protection of the interests of the self-described “Jewish” Bankster Gangsters, even at the expense of Jews in Germany and Europe. It is high-time for people to re-examine everything they thought they knew regarding Hitler, National Socialist Germany and World War II.

Allied Hypocrisy and Collusion:

What FDR said about Jews in private

By Rafael Medoff, Los Angeles times, April 7, 2013
FDR
In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called “the best way to settle the Jewish question.”
In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions “should be definitely limited” so as to “eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.” [FDR also]… dismissed pleas for Jewish refugees as “Jewish wailing” and “sob stuff”; expressing (to a senator ) his pride that “there is no Jewish blood in our veins”; and characterizing a tax maneuver by a Jewish newspaper publisher as “a dirty Jewish trick.” But the most common theme in Roosevelt’s private statements about Jews has to do with his perception that they were “overcrowding” many professions and exercising undue influence. “
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-medoff-roosevelt-holocaust-20130407,0,581781.story

Sir Winston Churchill: Zionist Hero


http://www.independent.co.uk
“Jewish supporters of Winston Churchill are to unveil a bust of the British wartime leader in Jerusalem this weekend in what they say is a long-overdue recognition of his staunch and unwavering support of the Jewish cause and their desire for a homeland.
“As a passionate Zionist all his life and a philo-semite, Churchill has been under-recognised,” says Anthony Rosenfelder, a trustee of the Jerusalem Foundation, which is behind the project to commemorate the British leader. He “combined a historical understanding of the Jewish people and what the promised land meant for Jews … with realpolitik”.
It is perhaps ironic that a statue of Churchill should stand just yards away from the King David Hotel, scene of a deadly Jewish terror attack on British military headquarters in 1946 that was to hasten the demise of mandate rule in Palestine.”
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/sir-winston-churchill-zionist-hero-8277918.html
RELATED INFO:
1. Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild by Robert John
2. Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means by Mark Weber
3.  Zionism vs Bolshevism by Winston Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald February 8, 1920, page 5 (David Irving)
Posted in Germany, Great Britain, Hitler, Israel, NSDAP, Palestine, United Kingdom, USA, World War II, Zionism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments




Naissance du nationalisme arabe au contact du national-socialisme allemand

NYJTIMES - Nazi Roots of Palestinian Nationalism (Notez que là où il est question d'extermination des juifs il est en réalité question d'expulsion massive des juifs.)

Les arabes de Palestine sous la bannière nazie. La collaboration entre nazis et nationalistes palestiniens  1933-1946






Sur ce blog:

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Du mythe des "nazis pro-Israël" et de ceux qui voient des complots partout...

Les nazis ont fait la vie dure aux Rothschild, confisqué leurs avoirs

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Gordon Duff décline l'invitation de Carolyn Yeager sous prétexte qu'elle ignore que la "connexion Bush-nazis"

Une contre-vérité tenace: "Prescott Bush, un nazi!"

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste (donc anti-nazie) des Rothschild

L'empire mondial anglo-américain: une marionnette des Rothschild?

Duff a tort sur l’Holocauste et les prétendus liens Bush-Hitler

L' "antisioniste" juif Gordon Duff admet écrire 40% de faussetés et poster 30% de faussetés sur son site Veteran Today

Jabotinsky avait planifié l'assassinat d'Hitler et de hauts dirigeants du IIIe Reich

La Judée déclare la guerre à l'Allemagne