lundi 7 octobre 2013

Hitler pour la paix, contre la guerre de Churchill

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Rudolf_hess.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/29/article-1392208-098285DC000005DC-901_233x423.jpg
Hitler approuvait la mission de paix de Hess en Angleterre

La fable convenue de l'Histoire est encore une fois confrontée à la dure réalité. L'histoire officielle ne peut plus nier que Rudolf Hess, condamné au procès de Nuremberg pour des crimes de guerre qu'il n'a pu commettre (puisqu'il était tenu emprisonné par les Anglais pendant toute la durée de la guerre!) et assassiné en prison, avait reçu l'autorisation d'Hitler pour se rendre en Angleterre en mission spéciale proposer un traité de paix. Mais Hess est tombé dans un piège tendu par les services secrets britanniques. Churchill aurait vu tous ses projets s'écrouler si Hitler avait réussi à éviter cette guerre inutile contre les démocraties. Churchill était l'instrument du groupe de financiers juifs The Focus, depuis qu'ils l'avaient sorti de sa banqueroute financière.




http://blanrue.blogspot.com/2013/10/vol-de-rudolf-hess-suite-churchill.html

samedi 26 octobre 2013

Vol de Rudolf Hess, suite : Churchill a refusé l'offre de paix de Hitler. Pour des "raisons morales" !


LIEN


Finalement c'est confirmé : Adolf Hitler avait bien fait une offre de paix en 1941

Voilà maintenant des semaines que la nouvelle est connue en Israël et en Grande-Bretagne, mais les grands médias américains gardent le silence sur la parution d'un nouveau livre écrit par un historien britannique de premier plan qui affirme qu'Adolf Hitler a cherché à obtenir la paix avec la Grande-Bretagne en 1941 mais que l'offre d'Hitler a été rejetée par le premier ministre Winston Churchill.

C'est le site israélien Ynet ainsi que le Daily Telegraph et le Daily Mail (tous deux de Londres) qui ont rapporté cette révélation qui change l'histoire "officielle" de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale et confirme ce que les historiens révisionnistes indépendants disent depuis des années.
 Dans Hess, Hitler and Churchill, le célèbre écrivain Peter Padfield affirme que la légendaire "mission de paix" de Rudolf Hess, fidèle adjoint d'Hitler, en Grande-Bretagne en mai 1941 avait bien eu l'approbation d'Hitler et que Hess apportait de la part d'Hitler l'offre suivante :  les forces allemandes se retiraient des pays qu'elles occupaient en Europe occidentale en échange du soutien de la Grande-Bretagne (ou du moins sa non-intervention) à une attaque imminente de l'Allemagne contre la Russie soviétique, dont il divulguait la date (fixée à cinq semaines plus tard).

La proposition d'Hitler - dans la langue officielle de tout traité de paix (et dactylographiée sur papier à lettres officiel d'Hitler) - garantissait à la Grande-Bretagne le maintien de son indépendance, de son empire et de l'ensemble de ses forces militaires. Le traité proposait ce qu'en anglais on traduirait par un état de "well-wishing neutrality" (une neutralité bienveillante) entre l'Allemagne et la Grande-Bretagne, ce qu'Hitler encourageait depuis longtemps.

Même si, comme le note The Telegraph, le voyage de Hess n'a traditionnellement pas été pris au sérieux mais est considéré comme "la mission en solitaire d'un fou", des écrivains indépendants soutiennent depuis des années (en se fondant sur des données ignorées ou supprimées par les grands médias et le monde universitaire) qu'Hitler avait choisi  - en accord avec Hess - de nier avoir été au courant de cette mission si cette dernière devait échouer, ce qui fut le cas.

Après avoir évacué son avion en Écosse, Hess comptait rencontrer des dignitaires britanniques intéressés par une paix avec l'Allemagne, mais, au lieu de cela, il fut placé en détention par les agents de Churchill et détenu au secret pendant 46 ans. Les détails de sa mission furent étouffés par le gouvernement Churchill.

Padfield soutient que Hess a été victime d'une opération des services de renseignement britanniques approuvée par Churchill, qui avait pour but d'attirer le pacificateur allemand en Grande-Bretagne. Ce qui sert de modèle à Padfield s'inspire de ce que d'autres appellent les "embrouilles" classiques comme savent si bien en faire depuis longtemps les services de renseignement britanniques.

Selon Padfield, une de ses sources a été un anonyme anglais du milieu universitaire. En même temps que d'autres, Padfield a été appelé pour traduire le traité pour Churchill qui (alors qu'on lui avait apporté une traduction en anglais effectuée par Hess) voulait une traduction produite par ses propres agents.

Le Telegraph écrit: "Il n'est fait mention de ce traité dans aucune des archives officielles rendues publiques depuis, mais M. Padfield pense que c'est parce qu'il y a eu un processus continu de camouflage pour protéger la réputation de personnages puissants", et il note que Padfield a "aussi réuni d'autres preuves à l'appui de l'existence de ce traité et de son contenu - ainsi que la preuve du camouflage qui s'ensuivit".

Padfield prétend que Churchill a fait un "choix moral" en rejetant l'offre de paix d'Hitler, ajoutant que Churchill désirait ardemment faire la guerre à Hitler et amener les États-Unis à entrer dans le conflit.

En revanche, les critiques de Churchill ont affirmé que si ce dernier poussait aussi résolument à la guerre contre Hitler - en dépit de l'opposition générale du peuple anglais et même de celle de la famille royale britannique - c'était parce que, quelques années auparavant (où il avait quasiment fait faillite et allait perdre sa maison ancestrale bien-aimée), Churchill avait été sauvé de la misère par un groupe de financiers juifs - connu sous l'appellation "le Focus" -  qui a payé les dettes de Churchill en échange de quoi ce dernier exécuterait tout ce qu'ils lui demanderaient.

En tout cas, comme le note Padfield, la révélation au public de la mission de paix de Hess aurait sapé la campagne de Churchill en faveur de la guerre.

Hess a été jugé et reconnu coupable de "crimes de guerre" par le Tribunal de Nuremberg après la guerre en dépit du fait qu'il n'avait pas été en mesure d'avoir commis le moindre crime de guerre puisqu'il a été emprisonné par les Britanniques pendant toute la durée de la guerre.

Condamné à la prison à vie, Hess est mort à la prison de Spandau en Allemagne en 1987; sa mort a été officiellement déclarée un suicide, mais de nouvelles données confirment que, comme beaucoup le pensent depuis longtemps, le vieil homme a en réalité été assassiné par les Britanniques.



Michael Collins Piper
(American Free Press)




WWII Blockbuster!
Adolf Hitler’s 1941 peace offer finally confirmed
by Michael Collins Piper
Nobel Peace Prize for Hitler? Holocaust® Lobby Burned Up Over Two New Books

It’s been news in Israel and in Britain for weeks now, but the American media is keeping under wraps the advent of a new book by a leading British historian which affirms that Adolf Hitler sought peace with Britain in 1941 but that Hitler’s offer was rejected by Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
Israel’s Ynet as well as The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail (both of London) reported this revelation that changes the “official” history of WWII and confirms what independent revisionist historians have said for years.
In Hess, Hitler and Churchill, renowned writer Peter Padfield affirms that the legendary “peace mission” to Britain in May 1941 by Hitler’s loyal deputy, Rudolf Hess, was indeed approved by Hitler and that Hess carried an offer from Hitler to withdraw German forces from occupied nations in Western Europe in return for Britain’s support for (or otherwise not frustrating) an impending German attack on Soviet Russia, the date of which (five weeks hence) was disclosed.
Hitler’s proposal—in the formal language of a peace treaty (typed on Hitler’s official stationery)—guaranteed Britain’s maintenance of its independence, its empire and all of its military forces.
The treaty proposed what translates into English as a state of “well-wishing neutrality” between Germany and Britain, something Hitler long endorsed.
Although, as The Telegraph noted, Hess’s journey has traditionally been dismissed as “the deranged solo mission of a madman,” independent writers have contended for years (based on data ignored or suppressed by the elite media and academia) that Hitler chose to deny his foreknowledge of the mission—in agreement in advance with Hess—if the mission failed, which it did.
Having evacuated his plane over Scotland, Hess expected to meet with British dignitaries interested in peace with Germany, only to be taken into custody by Churchill’s agents and held in solitary confinement for 46 years.
The details of his mission were suppressed by the Churchill government. Padfield contends Hess was the victim of a British intelligence operation, approved by Churchill, that was designed to lure the German peacemaker to Britain.
Padfield’s template reflects what others have described as a classic “double-cross” of the type British intelligence has long demonstrated an expertise in executing.
According to Padfield, one of his sources was an unnamed English academic. Along with others, Padfield was called in to translate the treaty for Churchill who (although presented with an English translation carried by Hess) wanted a translation produced by his own operatives.
The Telegraph reported, “There is no mention of the treaty in any of the official archives which have since been made public, but Mr. Padfield believes this is because there has been an ongoing cover-up to protect the reputations of powerful figures,” noting Padfield has “also assembled other evidence to support the existence of the treaty and its contents—as well as the subsequent cover-up.”
Padfield claims Churchill made a “moral choice” to reject Hitler’s peace offer, noting Churchill had a fervent desire to go to war against Hitler and to bring the United States into the conflict.
In contrast, Churchill’s critics have said that his determined push for war against Hitler—in the face of widespread opposition among the English people and even within the British royal family—is attributable to the fact that, some years before (having been virtually bankrupt and facing the loss of his beloved ancestral home), Churchill was rescued from penury by a group of Jewish financiers—known as “the Focus”—who paid Churchill’s debts in return for doing their bidding.
In any case, as Padfield notes, public exposure of the peace mission by Hess would have undercut Churchill’s agitation for war. Hess was tried and convicted of “war crimes” at the post-war Nuremberg Tribunal despite the fact he was in no position to have committed any war crimes, having been in British custody throughout the war.
Sentenced to life in prison, Hess died at the Spandau prison in Germany in 1987, officially declared a suicide, though new evidence confirms that, as many long believed, the old man was actually murdered by the British. For more, see the article on page 19.  (American Free Press, Sept. 21, 2013)
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.



Les britanniques ont-ils tué l'envoyé de la paix ?
 par Ronald L. Ray
pour American Free Press

En mai 1941, le député national-socialiste Rudolf Hess s'est envolé en solo pour une mission secrète audacieuse de l'Allemagne à la Grande-Bretagne, apportant des propositions de paix autorisées par Adolf Hitler lui-même. Mais il a volé vers un piège tendu par le Premier ministre britannique Winston Churchill, qui avait l'intention de prolonger le carnage de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Hess a passé les 46 années suivantes en prison, souvent dans l'isolement. À l'âge de 93 ans, malgré les rapports d'une rumeur de libération imminente, l'homme malade et gravement arthritique, qui pouvait à peine tenir une cuillère ou se tenir debout out seul, se serait lui-même pendu. Ou l’a-t-il fait ?
Dans « Rudolf Hess: sa trahison et son meurtre », le dernier gardien et infirmier du leader nazi, Abdallah Melaouhi, expose les preuves que Hess a été assassiné par un soldat américain noir, Tony Jordan, et deux autres hommes habillés comme des soldats américains.

C'est le récit d'un témoin oculaire, Abdallah Melaouhi, l'infirmier tunisien qui s'est occupé de Rudolf Hess durant les cinq dernières années de sa vie à la prison Allied-run de Spandau. Durant cette période, le tunisien est devenu un proche confident de Hess. Voici son histoire. Edition anglaise exclusive. Comprend les témoignages de Melaouhi ainsi qu'une série de notes secrètes  de Hess sur de nombreux sujets que son infirmier a sorti clandestinement de Spandau. Illustré. Couverture souple, 291 pages.


http://www.dr-olaf-rose.de/abdallah-melaouhi.jpg

Abdallah Melaouhi

Aujourd’hui, des documents britanniques récemment déclassifiés, dont une partie d'un rapport d'autopsie, ont été publiés, ce qui corrobore le récit du courageux Melaouhi et en rajoute sur la question : Pourquoi les assassins de Hess n’ont-ils pas été traduits en justice ? En effet, pourquoi a-t-il été assassiné à la fin ?
En Mars 2012, le Daily Mail de Londres a publié des photos précédemment secrètes de la maison de jardin de la prison de Spandau à Berlin, prise l'après-midi de la mort. Les images montrent des signes évidents de lutte et d'autres détails fournis par ailleurs par la description de Melaouhi de ce qu'il a observé en ce jour fatidique d’Août 1987. La preuve photographique semble réfuter la déclamation bizarre des alliés comme quoi Hess se serait suicidé .
Plus récemment, le 6 Septembre, un autre journal de Londres, The Independent, a publié plus d’informations de 1989, précédemment top-secret qui pointent vers deux agents secrets britanniques anonymes déguisés en soldats américains, comme les assassins du vieil homme sans défense, qui espérait encore être réuni avec sa famille avant de mourir. Selon le rapport du détective surintendant en chef de Scotland Yard Howard Jones, un chirurgien anglais, le Dr Hugh Thomas, avait donné à Jones les noms des deux meurtriers présumés, lequel Thomas les avait reçus d'un ancien membre de la SAS.
L'informateur a également affirmé que c'était sur l'ordre du gouvernement britannique que Hess avait été assassiné dans le but de protéger certains secrets de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Jones pensait que cela impliquait un complot nazi visant à renverser le gouvernement de Churchill - une affirmation ridicule -, étant donné la nature pacifique de Hess et sa mission. Comme le fonctionnaire de Scotland Yard ne croyait pas qu'il y ait « beaucoup de substance » dans les déclarations du médecin, il ne recommanda pas que des eff effort efforts soient faits pour trouver les assassins et d’autres témoins.
Comme il n’est pas certain que ces hommes aient été correctement localisés, depuis lors le Directeur des Poursuites Publiques Sir Allan Green a annulé l'enquête. Apparemment , des forces puissantes avaient intérêt à dissimuler la vérité au monde .
Mais il est encore temps pour la justice. Vous pouvez lire le reste de l'incroyable véritable histoire de Rudolf Hess : sa trahison et son meurtre. Ensuite, contactez les gouvernements américain et britannique afin d’exiger qu'ils trouvent et poursuivent en justice les trois hommes qui ont tué Hess et leurs complices.
Ronald L. Rau est auteur indépendant. Il réside dans l'état libre du Kansas et est descendant de plusieurs patriotes de la guerre d'Indépendance américaine.
Traduction: http://antaiji-jido.blogspot.com/2013/11/ca-cest-repasse-il-y-73-ans.html
Question : Hitler Prix Nobel de la Paix 1941 ?




Did Brits Kill Peace Envoy?
• New documents substantiate claims in new book from TBR

By Ronald L. Ray
In May 1941, National Socialist Deputy Fuehrer Rudolf Hess flew a daring, secret solo mission from Germany to Great Britain, bringing peace proposals authorized by Adolf Hitler himself.
But he flew into a trap set by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who was intent on prolonging World War II’s blood- shed. Hess spent the next 46 years in prison, many in solitary confinement.
At the age of 93, with reports of an imminent release cir- culating, the ailing and severely arthritic man, who could hardly hold a spoon or stand up on his own, allegedly hanged himself. Or did he?
In Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder, the Nazi leader’s last caretaker and nurse, Abdallah Melaouhi, lays out the evidence that Hess was in fact murdered by black American soldier Tony Jordan and two other men dressed as U.S. soldiers.
Now, recently declassified British documents, including part of an autopsy report, have been pub- lished, which corroborate Melaouhi’s courageous account and raise again the question: Why have Hess’s murderers not been brought to justice?
Indeed, why was he murdered at all? In March 2012, London’s The Daily Mail published previously secret photographs of the garden house at Spandau Prison in Berlin from the after- noon of the death. The images show clear signs of struggle and other details provided otherwise only by Melaouhi’s description of what he observed on that fateful day in August 1987.
The photographic evidence appears to disprove the Allies’s bizarre claim that Hess committed suicide. Most recently, on Sept. 6, another London paper, The Independent, published additional, previously top-secret information from 1989 that points to two unnamed British secret agents, disguised as American soldiers, as the assassins of the defenseless, elderly man, who had yet hoped to be reunited with his family before dying.
According to this Scotland Yard report by Detective Chief Superintendent Howard Jones, an English surgeon, Dr. Hugh Thomas, had passed to Jones the names of the two alleged murderers, which Thomas had received from a former member of the SAS. The informant also claimed that it was upon the order of the British government that Hess was murdered in order to protect certain WWII secrets.
Jones thought this involved a Nazi plot to over- throw the Churchill government—a ridiculous assertion, given Hess’s peaceful nature and mission. While the Scotland Yard official did not believe there to be “much substance” to the doctor’s claims, he did recommend that efforts be made to find the killers and other witnesses.
It is not known, however, if those men were indeed located, since then-Director of Public Prosecutions Sir Allan Green quashed the investigation.
Apparently, powerful forces had a vested interest in concealing the truth from the world. But there is still time for justice.
 You can read the rest of the amazing, true story in Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder. Then contact the U.S. and British governments to demand that they find and prosecute the three men and their co-conspirators who murdered Hess. (American Free Press, Sept. 21, 2013)
—— Ronald L. Ray is a freelance author residing in the free state of Kansas. He is a descendant of several patriots of the American War for Independence.


 

Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder is the accurate eyewitness account of Abdallah Melaouhi, the Tunisian male nurse who cared for Rudolf Hess for the last five years of his life at the Allied-run Spandau Prison. During that time the Tunisian be- came a close confidant of Hess. Here is his story. Exclusive English edition. Includes Melaouhiʼs eyewitness accounts plus a section of Hessʼs secret notes on many subjects that his nurse smuggled out of Spandau. Illustrated. Softcover, 291 pages, #643, $25 plus $5 Shipping and Handling inside the U.S. Outside U.S. add $24 Shipping and Handling. Send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. BONUS: Order within 10 days of receipt and we will throw in a FREE copy of Willis Cartoʼs A Straight Look at the Second World War.


Controversial Publisher Comments . . .
WILLIS CARTO, the publisher of revisionist historical journal THE BARNES REVIEW and author of A Straight Look at the Second World War, reflected on the new revelations regarding Rudolf Hess, saying: “I can’t help but take a certain satisfaction in seeing what I wrote about Hitler’s efforts for peace—and Churchill’s insistence upon war— now being confirmed this many years later.” “Although open-minded people have dared to look at the facts and have agreed that my assessment of World War II is on target,” Carto added, “it’s a point of view that runs contrary to that of organized Jewish and liberal groups that demand a monopoly on discussion about matters relating to WWII history. “The consequence is that the release of this new book may be an unexpected (and very welcome) turning point, marking a new beginning of taking a realistic, fact-based look at World War II, one less distorted by the Jewish agenda,” he said. Carto—who won the Purple Heart after being wounded in the Philippines while in the U.S. Army during World War II—acknowledged that, as a young man going to war he believed much of the pro-Churchill propaganda in the mass media of his day. However, after returning from the service he began to do his own study, leading him to very different conclusions about the causes of World War II and its consequences, which are today outlined in his aforementioned monograph, A Straight Look at World War II . Get a copy of this booklet for $1 from TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or get one free when you order the book described on page 19. (American Free Press, Sept. 21, 2013)



Hitler savait que Hess allait proposer la paix au Royaume-Uni
Par Laszlo Perelstein | publié le 27/09/2013 à 11h26, mis à jour le 27/09/2013 à 13h58
Et si les nazis avaient quitté l’Europe de l’Ouest pour se concentrer uniquement sur l’URSS sous le regard bienveillant d’une Grande-Bretagne neutre? Ce sont là les termes d’un accord de paix connu et proposé par Rudolf Hess le 10 mai 1941. Mais contrairement à ce qu'il a toujours affirmé, Hitler aurait été au courant des actes d'Hess et les aurait même orchestré, rapporte le Telegraph.
L’historien Peter Padfield, dans son livre Hess, Hitler and Churchill: the real turning point of the second World War – A secret history (le véritable tournant de la Seconde Guerre mondiale – Une histoire secrète) explique que le traité proposait un état de «wohlwollende Neutralitat» soit «neutralité désirée» entre les Britanniques et les Allemands. D’après le document, la date de l’attaque, alors imminente, d’Hitler contre l’Est aurait même été révélée.
A l’époque, le traité et la participation d'Hitler auraient été étouffés car cela aurait ruiné les efforts de Churchill pour impliquer les Etats-Unis dans la guerre, détruit sa coalition de gouvernements européens exilés et affaibli sa position en Grande-Bretagne. Hess est alors emprisonné dans la tour de Londres avant d’être jugé lors du procès de Nuremberg en 1946.
 
Les débris du Messerschmitt Bf 110 de Hess. Imperial War Museum via Wikimedia Commons.

Au vu de l’échec de la mission, Hitler prétend alors que Hess est devenu fou et a agi en renégat. L’historien Joachim Fest dans son livre Les Maîtres du IIIe Reich y voyait alors une «désobéissance constructive » de Hess, estimant que l’homme avait agi de sa propre volonté, sans l’accord du Führer.

Une théorie que vient complètement contredire Padfield. L'historien s'appuie sur les témoignages de traducteurs ayant eu accès au document:
«Ce n’était pas un complot renégat. Hitler a envoyé Hess et il a ramené avec lui un traité de paix très détaillé pour l’Allemagne concernant l’évacuation de tous les pays occupés à l’Ouest.»
Ce n’est pas la première fois que cette théorie fait son apparition. En 2011, un document de 28 pages a été découvert dans les archives russes rapportant qu’Hitler était au courant de la mission, précise le Daily Mail. Ecrit en 1948 par le Major Karlheinz Pintsch, longtemps adjudant de Hess, il mentionne qu’Hitler souhaitait «qu’un accord avec les Anglais aboutisse».

Dans les mêmes archives, l’interrogatoire de Pintsch montre qu’Hitler n’était pas surpris en apprenant l’arrestation de son représentant officiel. Le Führer aurait alors lu à voix haute un passage d'une lettre envoyée par Hess:
«Et si le projet… se termine par un échec… il vous sera toujours possible de nier toute responsabilité. Dites simplement que j’avais perdu mes esprits.»
Plus récemment, au début du mois de septembre, un document de 300 pages rédigés par Hess pendant sa détention à Londres a refait surface avant d'être mis sans succès aux enchères. Les termes de l'accord de paix présenté à Churchill y sont inclus, mais quant à savoir si ceux sont proposés par Hitler, c'est un mystère.







Hess, Hitler and Churchill: The Real Turning Point of the Second World War - A Secret History
Book Description
Release Date: 3 Oct 2013
When Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess set off for Britain on a peace mission in May 1941, he launched one of the great mysteries of the Second World War. Had he really acted alone, without Hitler's knowledge? Who were the British he had come to see? Was British intelligence involved? Now, award-winning historian Peter Padfield presents striking new evidence that demands the wholesale reappraisal of the episode, both in terms of what actually happened - and who knew what - and its significance in the wider context of the war. For, allied to a powerful argument that Hess must have had both Hitler's backing and considerable encouragement from Britain, Padfield demonstrates that he also brought with him a draft peace treaty committing Hitler to the evacuation of occupied European countries. Made public, this would have destroyed Churchill's campaign to bring the United States into the war. Expertly woven into a compelling narrative that touches on Lord (Victor) Rothschild and the Cambridge spy ring, possible British foreknowledge of Operation Barbarossa and the 'final solution', MI6's use of Hess to prevent the bombing of London and the mysterious circumstances of his death in Spandau prison - including the previously unseen witness accounts from that day - Hess, Hitler and Churchill is among the most important history books of recent years.


Hess, Hitler and Churchill: The Real Turning Point of World War Two - A Secret History
Rudolf Hess's flight to Britain in May 1941 is one of the most extraordinary mysteries of the Second World War and the subject of many books. Now acclaimed historian Peter Padfield, after years of research amongst newly released documents and interviews with informants who have never before spoken of their part in the affair, provides the most complete and accurate explanation of the Deputy Fuhrer's flight to this country.
It reveals that:
Hess was lured to Britain in an MI6 'sting' operation involving top-level British diplomats, with the knowledge of Winston Churchill.
Hess came on a deniable mission with the full knowledge of Hitler and Nazi ministers.
His reception party in this country probably included the Duke of Kent.
He brought documents with him that were concealed at the time - even from members of the government and Foreign Office - and which remain closed to the public.
These documents included a peace proposal typed in numbered clauses on Chancellery paper offering withdrawal of German forces from western occupied Europe if Britain would allow Germany a free hand in eastern Europe.
They detailed Hitler's plans for the conquest of Russia and extermination of Bolshevism; and according to the account of an informant who learned of it from a Guards officer who questioned Hess, they specified the deportation of Jews - to save them from planned liquidation..
If these terms had become known - and not agreed because Hitler could not be trusted - it would have been catastrophic for ritain's relations with America, the Jewish community and the heads of the exiled European governments in London.
It would also have meant open season on Churchill for the very powerful British interests campaigning for a 'compromise peace.'
The explosive nature of these proposals ensured that they were buried at the time; the fact that after seventy years they remain hidden is proof of a continuing cover-up, presumably on account of their sensitivity in relation to the 'holocaust' and the image of Churchill's conduct in the Second World War.
Hess's death in Spandau gaol, Berlin, was certainly not suicide, but murder; naturally, this is also under official wraps.


Historian: Hitler offered Churchill peace deal in 1941
New book sheds light on Rudolph Hess' 'deranged solo mission' to Britain, claims he brought with him treaty under which Nazis would withdraw from Western Europe
Ynet
Published: 09.27.13, 10:13 / Israel News
Rudolph Hess’ journey to Britain by fighter aircraft to Scotland in 1941 has traditionally been dismissed as the deranged solo mission of a madman, but a new book claims Adolf Hitler’s deputy brought with him from Hitler a detailed peace treaty, under which the Nazis would withdraw from western Europe, in exchange for British neutrality over the imminent attack on Russia.
The Telegraph said that in the book, historian Peter Padfield says a document that sheds light on the peace offer was revealed to him by an informant who claims that he and other German speakers were called in by MI6 to translate the treaty for Churchill.
The informant said the first two pages of the treaty detailed Hitler’s precise aims in Russia, followed by
sections detailing how Britain could keep its independence, Empire and armed services, and how the Nazis would withdraw from western Europe. The treaty proposed a state of “wohlwollende Neutralitat” – rendered as “well wishing neutrality,” between Britain and Germany, for the latter’s offensive against the USSR. The informant even said the date of the Hitler’s coming attack on the east was disclosed.

'A turning point of the war.' Churchill (Photo: EPA)
Padfield, who makes the claims in a new book, Hess, Hitler and Churchill, said: “This was not a renegade plot. Hitler had sent Hess and he brought over a fully developed peace treaty for Germany to evacuate all the occupied countries in the West.”
The Telegraph said Padfield, who has previously written a biography of Hess as well as ones of Karl Dönitz and Heinrich Himmler, believes the treaty was suppressed at the time, because it would have scuppered Churchill’s efforts to get the USA into the war, destroyed his coalition of exiled European governments, and weakened his position domestically, as it would have been seized on by what the author believes was a sizeable “negotiated peace” faction in Britain at that time. At the same time, since the mission had failed, it also suited Hitler to dismiss Hess as a rogue agent.
The British newspaper said there is no mention of the treaty in any of the official archives which have since been made public, but Padfield believes this is because there has been an ongoing cover-up to protect the reputations of powerful figures.
“This was a turning point of the war. Churchill could have accepted the offer, but he made a very moral choice. He was determined that Hitler, who could not be trusted, would not get away with it. He wanted the US in the war, and to defeat Hitler,” Padfield said.
Hess was kept captive in Britain until the end of the war when he was returned to Germany to stand trial at Nuremberg. He was sent to Spandau Prison where he died in 1987. The authorities said he had committed suicide, although his son and some historians have claimed the British state had him murdered to protect secrets.

 

DAILY MAIL - Nazis offered peace with the Allies in 1941… but only if they were allowed to invade Russia
  • The high-ranking Nazi was carrying out orders from the Fuhrer
  • Offered the British a deal that would see Germany pull out of Western Europe - so long as the fascists could attack the USSR without intervention
By Anna Edwards
|
The Nazis attempted to broker a peace offering with Britain - if they were allowed a free path to attack the USSR, a new book has revealed.
Rudolf Hess's flight to Britain during World War Two to sign a peace deal ordered by Adolf Hitler has long been recorded as a bizarre one man mission to try and reconcile warring West Europe and the Nazis.
But the high-ranking Nazi was actually carrying out orders from the Fuhrer when he flew to Messerschmitt to Scotland in May 1941.
He was to offer the British government a deal that would see Germany pull out of Western Europe - so long as the fascists could attack the USSR without intervention.
But historian Peter Padfield has discovered evidence he claims proves that the deputy Fuhrer held a detailed peace treaty.
It proposed that the Nazis would withdraw from western Europe, in exchange for British neutrality over a planned attack on Russia, the Daily Telegraph reported.
The researcher claims in a new book that a German-speaking unnamed informant told him he was called in to translate the documents that showed Germany wanted a clear path to attack the Soviets within five weeks.
Hess' mission began with him parachuting out over Renfrewshire where he was arrested by a farmhand with a pitchfork.
The Third Reich deputy wanted to contact the Duke of Hamilton to set peace talks with Winston Churchill in motion.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/09/26/article-2433733-19EF0665000005DC-316_306x423.jpghttp://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/09/26/article-2433733-1A09D794000005DC-679_306x423.jpg
No deal: Sir Winston Churchill refused to agree to Hitler's peace deal offered by Hess


But despite the offer, Churchill's morals were not swayed by the offer.
He refused to allow the Third Reich a clear path to attack the Eastern Front - because he did not trust Hitler's promises and it would have jeopardised his efforts to involve the U.S in the raging war, Mr Padfield says.
The author claims the Prime Minister was determined to beat Hitler and he did not want to destroy a coalition of European governments, so the offer was not made public.
Mr Padfield, who makes the claims in a new book, Hess, Hitler and Churchill, said: 'This was not a renegade plot.
'Hitler had sent Hess and he brought over a fully developed peace treaty for Germany to evacuate all the occupied countries in the West.'
Hess survived the war and was tried at Nuremberg for war crimes.
He was sentenced to life imprisonment and spent more time behind bars than any other Third Reich leaders before taking his own life in Spandau Prison near Berlin in 1987, aged 93.
At Nuremberg Hess appeared to be the delusional, forgetful, mentally ill figure that Hitler claimed he was after the abortive mission.

THE MYTH THAT HESS ACTED ALONE ON A 'MAD MAN MISSION'

David Maclean, the ploughman who caught Rudolph Hess
David Maclean, the ploughman who caught Rudolph Hess

It was an act recorded as a one-man mad mission.
Hess was, apparently, trying to set peace talks with Winston Churchill in motion under his own initiative.
Hitler was even supposed to have scrambled aircraft to try to stop Hess, his deputy, from leaving Germany.
But a 28-page notebook discovered in a Russian archive in 2011 disputes this theory and indicates that Hitler was in on the mission.
It was written in 1948 by Major Karlheinz Pintsch, a long-time adjutant to Hess.
He was captured by the Soviets and spent years undergoing  torture and interrogation at  their hands.
In the notebook he writes that Hitler hoped that an ‘agreement with the Englishmen would be successful’.
Pintsch notes that Hess’s task – five weeks before Germany launched its invasion of Russia – was to ‘bring about, if not a military alliance of Germany with England against Russia, then to bring about a neutralisation of England’.
Pintsch’s interrogation transcripts found in the same archive in Moscow show that Hitler was not surprised when news came through of Hess’s capture.
The relevant section reads: 'Nor did he rant and rave about what Hess had done.
Instead, he replied calmly: 'At this particular moment in the war that could be a most hazardous escapade.'
'Hitler then went on to read a letter that Hess had sent him.
'He read the following significant passage out aloud: "And if this project . . . ends in failure . . . it will always be possible for you to deny all responsibility. Simply say I was out of my mind".'
This is what would happen after the mission failed, with both Hitler and Churchill claiming Hess was deranged.





Nazis ‘offered to leave western Europe in exchange for free hand to attack USSR’

Who was Rudolf Hess?
Adolf Hitler and his personal representative Rudolf Hess (right) Photo: AP photo
By Jasper Copping, The Telegraph, 26 Sep 2013
But a new book claims to have solved the riddle of the flight to Britain in 1941 of Rudolf Hess, Adolf Hitler’s deputy.  Hess’s journey to Britain by fighter aircraft to Scotland has traditionally been dismissed as the deranged solo mission of a madman.  
But Peter Padfield, an historian, has uncovered evidence he says shows that, Hess, the deputy Fuhrer, brought with him from Hitler, a detailed peace treaty, under which the Nazis would withdraw from western Europe, in exchange for British neutrality over the imminent attack on Russia.  
The existence of such a document was revealed to him by an informant who claims that he and other German speakers were called in by MI6 to translate the treaty for Churchill.  
The figure, who is not named by Mr Padfield, was an academic who later worked at a leading university. He has since died. Before his death, he passed on an account of how the group were assembled at the BBC headquarters, in Portland Place, London, to carry out the task. 
The academic said Hess had brought with him the proposed peace treaty, expressed in numbered clauses and typed on paper from the German Chancellery. An English translation was also included, but the British also wanted the original German translated.
The informant said the first two pages of the treaty detailed Hitler’s precise aims in Russia, followed by sections detailing how Britain could keep its independence, Empire and armed services, and how the Nazis would withdraw from western Europe. The treaty proposed a state of “wohlwollende Neutralitat” – rendered as “well wishing neutrality”, between Britain and Germany, for the latter’s offensive against the USSR. The informant even said the date of the Hitler’s coming attack on the east was disclosed.  
Mr Padfield, who makes the claims in a new book, Hess, Hitler and Churchill, said: “This was not a renegade plot. Hitler had sent Hess and he brought over a fully developed peace treaty for Germany to evacuate all the occupied countries in the West.”
Mr Padfield, who has previously written a biography of Hess as well as ones of Karl Dönitz and Heinrich Himmler, believes the treaty was suppressed at the time, because it would have scuppered Churchill’s efforts to get the USA into the war, destroyed his coalition of exiled European governments, and weakened his position domestically, as it would have been seized on by what the author believes was a sizeable “negotiated peace” faction in Britain at that time. At the same time, since the mission had failed, it also suited Hitler to dismiss Hess as a rogue agent.  There is no mention of the treaty in any of the official archives which have since been made public, but Mr Padfield believes this is because there has been an ongoing cover-up to protect the reputations of powerful figures. The author says that his informant broke off contact with him after approaching his former masters in the security services.
Mr Padfield added: “If the Royal Family was seriously involved in compromise peace plans, that would be very damaging, though I think it more likely that Hess brought news to Churchill of the coming Holocaust. It could damage perceptions of his and Britain’s wartime record if that were released.  
“This was a turning point of the war. Churchill could have accepted the offer, but he made a very moral choice. He was determined that Hitler, who could not be trusted, would not get away with it. He wanted the US in the war, and to defeat Hitler.”
Mr Padfield has also assembled other evidence to support the existence of the treaty and its contents – as well as the subsequent cover-up.  He has established that two inventories were taken of items carried by Hess when he was arrested after parachuting out of his aircraft, a Messerschmitt 110, on the evening of May 10 1941, near Eaglesham, outside of Glasgow. Neither has ever been released.  He has found witness statements from a woman living near where Hess had landed, which indicate that police were “ordered to search for a valuable document which was missing”. The item, according to the witness, was found “over near the wee burn in the park”.
Mr Padfield also points out that Hess had used a specialist translator from the German Foreign Ministry – even though he had the use of another, fluent English speaker – when drawing up documents for his negotiations with the British, before his flight. This suggests, Mr Padfield claims, that approved wording was required for the documents.  
Hess was kept captive in Britain until the end of the war when he was returned to Germany to stand trial at Nuremberg. He was sent to Spandau Prison where he died in 1987. The authorities said he had committed suicide, although his son and some historians have claimed the British state had him murdered to protect secrets.




David Irving's newsletter Action Report On-line:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/




The Piper Report Oct 7, 2013
mcp1
Piper talks about Peter Padfield's new book "Hess, Hitler and Churchill: the real turning point of the second World War – A secret history"
Download Here 
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM






FLASHBACK: Daily Mail - Hitler 'gave go-ahead to Rudolf Hess mission to secure peace with Winston Churchill'
 By Allan Hall In Berlin
UPDATED: 21:13 GMT, 29 May 2011
Rudolf Hess’s flight to Britain during World War Two in a bizarre attempt to secure peace was backed by Adolf Hitler, fresh documents claim.History has long recorded that the Nazi number three was acting alone when he piloted a Messerschmitt to Scotland in May 1941.He parachuted out over Renfrewshire and was arrested by a farmhand with a pitchfork.
Hess was, apparently, trying to  contact the Duke of Hamilton to set peace talks with Winston Churchill in motion under his own initiative.
Hitler was even supposed to have scrambled aircraft to try to stop Hess, his deputy, from leaving Germany.

On Hitler's say-so, Hess was apparently dropped into Britain to set up peace talks with Winston Churchill 
On Hitler's say-so, Hess was apparently
dropped into Britain to set up peace talks
with Winston Churchill

But a 28-page notebook discovered in a Russian archive disputes this  theory and indicates that Hitler was in on the mission. It was written in 1948 by Major Karlheinz Pintsch, a long-time adjutant to Hess.
He was captured by the Soviets and spent years undergoing  torture and interrogation at  their hands.
In the notebook he writes that Hitler hoped that an ‘agreement with the Englishmen would be  successful’.
Pintsch notes that Hess’s task – five weeks before Germany launched its invasion of Russia – was to ‘bring about, if not a military alliance of Germany with England against Russia, then to bring about a neutralisation of England’.
Pintsch’s interrogation transcripts found in the same archive in Moscow show that Hitler was not surprised when news came through of Hess’s capture.
The relevant section reads: ‘Nor did he rant and rave about what Hess had done. Instead, he replied calmly: “At this particular moment in the war that could be a most hazardous escapade”.
‘Hitler then went on to read a letter that Hess had sent him.
‘He read the following significant passage out aloud: “And if this project . . . ends in failure . . . it will always be possible for you to deny all responsibility. Simply say I was out of my mind”.’
This is what happened, with both Hitler and Churchill claiming Hess was deranged.
The allegations surfaced in  Der Spiegel magazine in Germany over the weekend.
Hess survived the war and was tried at Nuremberg for war crimes.
He was sentenced to life imprisonment and spent more time behind bars than any other Third Reich leaders before taking his own life in Spandau Prison near Berlin in 1987, aged 93.
Hess with other Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg Trials where he seemed to be the mentally ill character Hitler described
Hess with other Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg Trials where he seemed to be the mentally ill character Hitler described
At Nuremberg Hess appeared to be the delusional, forgetful,  mentally ill figure that Hitler claimed he was after the abortive mission.
But the Pintsch diary, soon to be delivered to German historians  for study, may suggest that this was an act.
Although an aide to Hess, Pintsch was also a trusted friend and adviser, who would have been privy to his master’s secrets.
It fell to Pintsch to tell Hitler of the failure of the Hess operation.
Pintsch was now a dangerous witness and he was arrested and kept in solitary confinement until being sent to the Eastern Front in 1944.
He was captured by the Soviets and released in 1955. He was never able to hold a knife or fork again because his hands were so badly broken during his torture.



I Hate Ike: Congress Snubs WWII Vet

By Michael Collins Piper for American Free Press
As far as Congress is concerned, American veterans are expendable. That’s the impression many people have. In fact, Congress has turned a blind eye to at least some veterans’ concerns: the establishment of a taxpayer-financed $120 million memorial to an Americanmilitary leader guilty ofmass genocide—ex-President Dwight Eisenhower.
On Oct. 12, 2012 AFP described Ike’s sordid record and the congressional push to fund an Eisenhower memorial in an unsettling expose written by John Tiffany of THE BARNES REVIEW, the historical journal published byWillis Carto. A U.S. Army Purple Heart winner—wounded in combat in the Pacific in World War II—Carto wrote one of two further articles published in AFP on July 8, 2013 describing Eisenhower’s crimes. As AFP noted:
After World War II, Eisenhower was personally responsible for the deliberate genocide of nearly 2 million German prisoners of war who starved to death or died of disease and exposure, held in some 19 different outdoor pens (large fields surrounded by barbed wire) in sub-freezing weather without food, water or sanitation—open-air, excrement-filled holes. In one instance, some 560,000 of Ike’s victims were crowded into a death trap that would be fit for holding no more than 45,000 men.
“Instead of treating these soldiers as prisoners of war, as he was bound to do under the Geneva Convention,” wrote Carto, “Eisenhower invented a new category, designating them as ‘disarmed enemy personnel.’” This, Carto commented, was the “doubletalk of a pettifogging shyster lawyer” Eisenhower used to justify his crime.
In fact, Ike alsomurdered 2million former Russian POWs who sought to defect to the West to escape communist tyranny. Ike was personally responsible for the order that forcibly “repatriated” the Russian dissidents who were shipped back to the Soviet Union to certain execution.
Many World War II veterans responded favorably to Carto’s article, recalling, as AFP noted, that before Franklin D. Roosevelt promoted Eisenhower in 1943 to Allied Supreme Commander in Europe (over the heads of more than 50 seasoned officers)—a move that shocked the military establishment—Ike was a paper-pushing bureaucrat with no serious military experience.
Ike’s firstmajor test—his design for the invasion of Europe in 1944—nearly failed. Despite massive logistical superiority of the forces under his command, thousands of Allied soldiers died needlessly on D-Day.
On July 3, 2013 Carto wrote every member of Congress—enclosing the issue of AFP with its reports on Eisenhower—urging Congress to stop the Eisenhower memorial.
“As a holder of the Purple Heart award for wounds received in combat—an experience Eisenhower never had—I believe I have a right to bring this matter to your attention,” wrote Carto.
On Oct. 21, 2013—not having received even a single answer to his letter—Carto again wrote every member of Congress, asking that they respond to his latest letter. Carto pointed out that James Bacque had outlined Ike’s record in Other Losses.* So Eisenhower’s crimes were no secret: Bacque’s book had beenwidely publicized as a consequence of its controversial findings.
But as of Feb. 12, 2014 Carto had still not received a single letter from anyone in Congress regarding the memorial.
In the end, thememorial has proceeded as far as it has because, as Carto wrote in AFP, “No one has had the guts to point out that Eisenhower is literally the last person in theworldwho should be honored by the American people because his record clearly shows him to be a mass murderer.”
——
*Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans After World War II. Instead of praise, Ike should be remembered for his murder of millions of hapless German prisoners after World War II. Canadian reporter James Bacque revealed the chilling story of Ike’s mass murder of millions of disarmed, surrendered German soldiers in 1945 in his book Other Losses when no one elsewould. Other Losses (softcover, 324 pages, $20 plus $5 S&H in the U.S.) is available fromTBR, P.O. Box 15877,Washington,D.C. 20003. Call TBR toll free at 1-877-773-9077 to charge.







Hitler, le nazisme et la 2e guerre mondiale

Netanyahou au NYT : "Herzl et Churchill étaient plus isolés plus moi"



VIDEO - Himmler assassiné sous ordre de Churchill: un témoin gênant selon Arthur Butz

VIDEO - Spingola and VKC - Hess, Hitler & Evil Swiss Bankers!

Michael Collins Piper, YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH

 



http://www.barnesreview.org/images/Jan_Feb_2014_TBR_Covers_Small.jpg
Get Your Copy of the January/February 2014 Issue of TBR
By Michael Collins Piper
The January/February issue of THE BARNES REVIEW is a very special issue of THE BARNES REVIEW. Why? There aren’t many magazines anywhere—maybe we should say “there aren’t any magazines anywhere”—that would take the position that Adolf Hitler, rather than being a monstrous mass murderer, was in fact a hero to his people.
Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.
The truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany (both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different fromwhat has been painted by the mass media and academia.
There’s much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle in the bigger picture.
That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to where we are today.
So we are especially interested in hearing from potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s underlying message is all about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the wall of lies about history.
To get a copy of this issue for $10, send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price of $46 (U.S.) and send you all new issues as they are published (five more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 6 when responding.

‘Best Ever’—‘Most Controversial’ Issue of TBR Yet?
By Michael Collins Piper
The January/February issue of THE BARNES REVIEW is a very special issue. Why? There aren’t many magazines anywhere—maybe we should say “there aren’t any magazines anywhere”—that would take the position that Adolf Hitler, rather than being a monstrous mass murderer, was in fact a hero to his people.
Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.
The truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany (both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different from what has been painted by the mass media and academia.
There’s much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle in the bigger picture.
That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to where we are today.
So we are especially interested in hearing from potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s mission is all about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the wall of lies about history.
To get a copy of this issue for $10, send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price of $46 (U.S.) and send you all newissues as they are published (five more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 7 when responding.

Plutocracy Thrives on War

 • Your fellow Americans need the truth found in AMERICAN FREE PRESS
By Willis A. Carto
And now the geniuses who run our foreign policy tell us that we must have troops in Afghanistan until 2024. After all, don’t we have to bring “democracy” to these mountaineers who like their country just the way it’s been for many centuries?
Afghanistan has never started any war with the United States. The Afghans just want to be left alone. But we can’t have that, now, can we?
The Afghans raise a lot of poppies. It’s a pretty flower. The fact that opium is made from poppies wouldn’t have anything to do with our foreign policy, would it? Or can it be that this profitable fact has something to do with our foreign policy? You wouldn’t suppose that some of the patriotic gents who run our foreign policy have their filthy hands in the till, would you?
This relatively minor situation can hardly be compared with our intervention into the European war that became World War I by our stupid intervention.
We lost 116,708 American men in that needless adventure, not tomention spending some $32 billion. The interest on that debt is accumulating and is now perhaps in the hundreds of billions of dollars, but who’s counting?
And then there was the European war that started when Winston Churchill declared war on a Germany that tried everything to avoid such a calamity. Franklin Roosevelt told us that we had to stop that madman, Adolf Hitler, before he conquered the world although that was not Hitler’s plan at all—all he wanted was to stop the communist aggressor, Josef Stalin. He even sent his deputy, Rudolf Hess, to Britain with a written peace offer for Churchill. But Hess was locked up and held in solitary confinement by Churchill for the rest of his life for having the boldness to try to stop the war. For Roosevelt, this was the golden opportunity he needed to get a third and even a fourth term. A good war has many advantages for criminal politicians.
Why can’t Americans realize that the political establishment feeds on war and rumors of war?
The war industry is extremely profitable for the makers of tanks, warplanes, battleships, uniforms, etc. They never have to worry about payment for their paraphernalia for war; the government always pays with your tax money or more national debt. And the latter has the advantage of bearing interest that the bankers and bondholders love.
Can the American people wake up and stop acting like children? Why doesn’t the rest of the media say what AMERICAN FREE PRESS does?
Since the rest of the media can’t be trusted to tell the American people what they need to know, the people’s only alternative is AFP. For that reason alone AFP should have at least a million subscribers.
So why doesn’t AFP have a million subscribers?
I am not sure, but let’s do something about it right now. . . .
On page 8 of this issue is a coupon offering 16 weeks of AFP to a friend for just $15. All you have to do is fill out the form, enclose $15 and send the form along with the address of the gift recipient to AFP. I will personally match every subscription that comes in from this coupon out of my own pocket. If every subscriber would do that, we could double our numbers overnight, and I’ll be happily applying for a loan at the bank.
——
Willis A. Carto is a longtime national editor and publisher. In 1955, Carto founded LIBERTY LOBBY, the first all-American, pro-middle class lobby group. In 1975 he launched The Spotlight newspaper which at one time had 375,000 subscribers. Currently he is the editor and publisher of THE BARNES REVIEW Revisionist history magazine. For a free sample issue and brochure, please contact TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Anyone who wants a free copy of Carto’s booklet A Straight Look at the SecondWorldWar need only send $1 to the above address. TBR also has a website carrying books that relate to the subjects covered above. These include Smedley Butler’s War Is a Racket, Joachim Hoffman’s Stalin’s War of Extermination, Victor Suvorov’s The Chief Culprit, David Irving’s Churchill’s War, Abdallah Melaouhi’s Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder and PerpetualWar for Perpetual Peace, edited by Harry Elmer Barnes. See more at www.barnesreview.com.



Lovin’ on Hitler
Nearly 70 years after Adolf Hitler’s death, you would think the record would be straight on the Third Reich and the Holocaust. After all, few periods in history have been subjected to as much detailed scholarly review as Hitler’s reign.
But then the denizens of The Barnes Review (TBR), a bimonthly journal dedicated to historical revisionism and denial of the Holocaust, aren’t really scholars. So it’s only a mild surprise that they’re now turning themselves inside out to make Hitler into a stand-up guy — the unfortunate victim of a slanderous campaign waged by those who worship at the “altar of the Holocaust industry.”
In TBR’s January/February issue, under the unambiguous title of “In Defense of Adolf Hitler,” the editors have thrown themselves behind the führer with all the enthusiasm of a Better Homes and Gardens special section dedicated to growing the best tulips. But even they understand they’ve crossed a line — a fact that Michael Collins Piper, a contributing editor, concedes in the lead editorial.
“[W]e should acknowledge that many of our new readers may, frankly, be startled by the theme of this issue, which — right up front — declares itself as standing ‘In Defense of Adolf Hitler,’” Piper wrote. “There aren’t many magazines anywhere — maybe we should say ‘there aren’t any magazines anywhere’ — that would take that position. Well, TBR does, without hesitation and with no apology.”
Well, color us unsurprised. When it comes to the distortion of facts in order to manipulate history, TBR remains in a class of its own. And it has pretty well always operated without hesitation or apologies.
Named after Harry Elmer Barnes, a prominent 20th-century anti-Semite and Holocaust denier, TBR was started and is still published by Willis Carto, who also founded the extreme-right Liberty Lobby and the Holocaust-denying Institute for Historical Review. Its mission over 20 years has been to bring “history into accord with the facts” in all kinds of cases. But in reality, it is obsessed with denying the Holocaust and denouncing the alleged evils of Jews. Today, it sells an “official” version of Hitler’s Mein Kampf, along with dubious books like Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence and The Work of All Ages: The Ongoing Plot to Rule the World From Biblical Times to the Present.
TBR even once suggested that Hitler was unfairly overlooked as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize. Seriously.
Now, with its special issue defending “one of the most misrepresented figures in all of history,” you might expect a nice collection of intriguing questions from TBR’s intrepid editors. When he wasn’t plotting world domination, wasn’t Hitler an avid lover of animals? When he wasn’t dealing with the “Jewish question,” didn’t he have a reputation for being great with kids? What was his personal recipe for Wiener Schnitzel, anyway? They might even have offered an article on Nazi grooming — “The Toothbrush Moustache: Time to Bring it Back?”
But they didn’t. When you look closely, TBR’s defense of the Nazi mass murderer relies on criticizing the enemies of the Third Reich and lionizing Hitler’s programs. There’s an attack on the “air terrorism” of the British. There’s a defense of the “loving and caring” Lebensborn program for unwed mothers, where “pure” Aryan women were encouraged to mate with SS officers and which included the kidnapping of perhaps a quarter million children from their parents.
The same issue also carries “The Hitler Youth Vindicated,” by Daniel W. Michaels, a former Defense Department official who says the paramilitary group merely instructed children in “the promotion of love of country and people; enjoyment of honest and open combat and of healthy physical activity; veneration of ethical and spiritual values; the placing of the common good ahead of individual gain; and the rejection of all values originating from Jewry.”
Still, even TBR admits that Hitler had a drawback.
“His major fault, if he can be criticized for that, is that he cared for and loved his own people, the German working class, who were deprived and robbed of their wealth and capital by the international bankers,” Cassian d’Ornellas, a retired teacher, wrote in one essay. D’Ornellas’ comment comes in an article that contains an important and never-before-reported fact: Contrary to what readers of TBR might think, Hitler was not, in fact, secretly funded by the Rothschilds.



Le paradoxe des commémorations du débarquement allié

Vidéo, le débarquement de Normandie: La face cachée des libérateurs

The Lessons of History: In 1966 President De Gaulle Said No to US-NATO

Pourquoi De Gaulle a refusé d'assister au 20e anniversaire du débarquement en 1964

The Post War II New World Order Map: A Proposal to Re-arrange the World after an Allied Victory

La Seconde Guerre mondiale aurait pu prendre fin en 1943 Au fur et à mesure que les Anglo-Saxons étendent leur influence en Europe centrale et orientale, intégrant les anciens États du Pacte de Varsovie dans l’Union européenne et l’OTAN, ils procèdent a une révision historique de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. L’objectif de Londres et de Washington est de s’arroger l’exclusivité de la victoire contre le nazisme, de se poser en parangons de la démocratie, et d’assimiler communisme et nazisme dans une même opprobre. Les crimes du stalinisme sont placés en équivalence avec ceux de l’hitlérisme, tandis que ceux de la colonisation sont purement effacés.



Sur ce blog:

Le président Roosevelt a tout fait pour empêcher une résolution pacifique du conflit

Comment le Lend-Lease de FDR a sauvé l'Union Soviétique

En mémoire du plus grand crime de l'histoire moderne

Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde guerre mondiale

Bush, Rockefeller, Rothschild et Hitler


Le devoir de mémoire: source de motivation pour Alex Jones dans son combat, fondement du nouvel ordre mondial pour le B'nai Brith

Gertrude Stein, juive, proposait de donner le Nobel de la paix à Hitler

Churchill a-t-il fait assassiner Mussolini?

Pat Buchanan: Hitler voulait-il la guerre?

Qu'ont en commun ces patriotes américains?

Autour de l'un des meilleurs historiens de la Seconde guerre mondiale

The Jewish War of Survival

Devoir de mémoire, devoir de faire tomber l'axe Iran-Syrie-Liban

Le jeu des comparaisons: des ressemblances entre la période actuelle et celle d'avant l'accession d'Hitler au pouvoir

L'islamisme radical est-il plus proche des nazis ou des inglourious basterds?

Le vol des brevets allemands et Paperclip

Simulacre de procès et torture à Nuremberg

Adolf le Grand diffamé par des "nationalistes"

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Du mythe des "nazis pro-Israël" et de ceux qui voient des complots partout...

Les nazis ont fait la vie dure aux Rothschild, confisqué leurs avoirs

Le mythe des origines juives d'Hitler

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Un saboteur à la tête du mouvement de vérité

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Le jeu des comparaisons: l'islamisme radical est-il plus proche du nazisme ou des "inglourious basterds"?

Le jeu des devinettes: qu'ont en commun Al Capone et la contrebande d'alcool durant la prohibition, Meyer Lansky et l'armement de tsahal, Jack Ruby et l'assassinat de JFK, la production d'anthrax à Grosse-Ile au Québec et la Seconde guerre mondiale, John McCain et Rupert Murdoch, la guerre contre le nationalisme québecois et le nouveau chef des finances du parti Libéral canadien?

Comment le Lend-Lease de FDR a sauvé l'Union Soviétique

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste (donc anti-nazie) des Rothschild

Des sympathies et ambitions nationalistes de Joseph P. Kennedy

L'empire mondial anglo-américain: une marionnette des Rothschild?

Une contre-vérité tenace: "Prescott Bush, un nazi!"

Jabotinsky avait planifié l'assassinat d'Hitler et de hauts dirigeants du IIIe Reich

Une historienne à découvrir

Les responsables de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale

La conjuration contre l'Esprit - Les arrières-plans occultes du "nouvel ordre mondial"

L'Histoire contemporaine: une "fable convenue"

Le plus beau dans nos chères démocraties, c'est qu'on n'a pas à s'inquiéter pour sa liberté d'opinion et d'expression.... N'EST-CE PAS?


Une comique juive au parlement israélien: je ne voulais pas heurter la mémoire de la Shoah en dénonçant le cancer de l'immigration africaine en Israël