C'est ce que démontre Max Blumenthal dans son dernier ouvrage The Management of Savagery: How America’s National Security State fueled the rise of Al Qaeda, ISIS, and Donald Trump. Chapeau pour sa compréhension du document Clean Break (de Richard Perle et Douglas Feith pour la première présidence de Netanyahou), document d'une importance fondamentale dans la compréhension des intérêts israéliens dans le remodelage du Moyen-Orient. Il souligne également avec justesse le rôle de Netanyahou dans la
création et la propagation, dès la fin des années 70, de toute la mythologie du terrorisme islamiste international sur fond de conflit des civilisations entre l'Ouest et l'Islam. C'est un peu tard, nombreux sont ceux qui l'avaient déjà plus ou moins saisi, en tout cas mieux vaut tard que jamais.
Compte-rendu de Chris Hedges:
(Apr 08, 2019) Reckoning With Failure in the War on Terror
Donald Trump’s ascendancy to the presidency, as Max Blumenthal points out in his insightful book “The Management of Savagery: How America’s National Security State Fueled the Rise of Al Qaeda, ISIS, and Donald Trump,” was made possible not only by massive social inequality and concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of the oligarchic elites but by the national security state’s disastrous and prolonged military interventions overseas.From the CIA’s funneling of over a billion dollars to Islamic militants in the 1970s war in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union to the billion dollars spent on training and equipping the radical jihadists currently fighting in Syria, the United States has repeatedly empowered extremists who have filled the vacuums of failed states it created. The extremists have turned with a vengeance on their sponsors. Washington’s fueling of these conflicts was directly responsible for the rise of figures such as Ayman al-Zawahiri and Osama bin Laden and ultimately laid the groundwork for the 9/11 attacks. It also spawned the rabid Islamophobia in Europe and the United States that defines Trump’s racist worldview and has been successfully used to justify the eradication of basic civil liberties and democratic rights.The misguided interventions by the national security apparatus have resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, over 5 million desperate refugees fleeing to Europe, the destruction of entire cities, the squandering of some $5 trillion of U.S. taxpayer money, rampant corruption and criminality. The mandarins of national security, rather than blunt the rise of radical jihadism, have ensured its spread across the globe. The architects of this imperial folly have a symbiotic relationship with those they profess to hate. The two radical extremes—the interventionists in the national security apparatus and the radical jihadists—play off of each other to countenance ever-greater acts of savagery. The more perfidious your enemy, the more your own extremism is justified. We are locked in a macabre dance with the killers we created and empowered, matching war crime for war crime, torture for torture and murder for murder. This unrestrained violence has a dark momentum that escapes management and control. It exacerbates the very insecurity it claims to be attempting to eliminate by constantly creating legions of new enemies.“Drone strikes take out a few bad guys to be sure, but they also kill a large number of innocent civilians,” Nabeel Khoury, a former U.S. deputy chief of mission in Yemen, argues. “Given Yemen’s tribal structure, the U.S. generates roughly forty to sixty new enemies for every AQAP [al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula] operative killed by drones.”The binary view of the world imagined by right-wing ideologues such as Richard Pipes during the Cold War, defined as a battle to the death against godless communism, has been reimagined by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and American neocons such as Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, Fred Fleitz, Robert Kagan, Steve Bannon, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld and leaders of the Christian right including Gary Bauer and William Bennett to become a battle to the death between the “barbarity” of Islam and the “civilized” ethic of the Judeo-Christian West. It is a rebranding of the Cold War, so useful to the retrograde forces of capitalism in crushing popular dissent and so profitable to the arms industry. Its most prominent voices are a bizarre collection of neofascist ideologues and quack conspiracy theorists such as Bannon, Sean Hannity, Stephen Miller and Pam Geller, who claims that Barack Obama is the love child of Malcolm X.This ideology, like the ideology of anti-communism, erases not only history but context. Those who oppose us are removed from the realm of the rational. They are seen as incomprehensible. Their hate has no justification. They are human embodiments of evil that must be eradicated. They despise us for our “values” or because they are driven by a perverted form of Islam. The failure, as Blumenthal writes, to place these conflicts in context, to examine our own complicity in fueling a justifiable anger, even rage, dooms us to perpetual misunderstanding and perpetual warfare. Our response is to employ greater and greater levels of violence that only expand the extremism at home and abroad. This demented project, as Blumenthal writes, collapses “the fragile space where multi-confessional societies survive.” It bifurcates political space into competing forms of extremism between the jihadists and the counter-jihadists. It creates a strange and even comforting “mutually reinforcing symbiosis” that depends “on a constantly escalating sense of antagonism.”The methods used on a wary public by the national security state, especially the FBI and the intelligence agencies, to justify and advance these wars are increasingly unsavory. Muslims, many suffering from emotional and mental disabilities, are baited by law enforcement into “terrorist” plots that few of them could have conceived or organized on their own. The highly publicized arrests and quashing of these nascent “terrorist plots” exaggerate the presence of radical jihadists within the country. They keep fear at a fever pitch among the U.S. population. Trevor Aaronson, the author of “Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terror,” found that nearly half of all terror prosecutions between Sept. 11, 2001, and 2010 involved informants, including some with criminal backgrounds who were paid as much as $100,000 by the FBI. Aaronson noted that during the last year of the George W. Bush administration the government did not prosecute anyone arrested in a terrorist “sting.” But such stings exploded under Barack Obama, a tactic that Blumenthal writes was “designed to cast his administration as just as tough on terror as any Republican”—the Obama administration “announced an arrest resulting from a terrorism sting every sixty days.” This suggested, Aaronson writes, “that there are a lot of ineffective terrorists in the United States, or that the FBI has become effective at creating the very enemy it is hunting.”The longer and more confusing the “war on terror” becomes, nearly two decades on, the more irrational our national discourse becomes. The paranoid and racist narratives of the far right have poisoned the mainstream dialogue. These racist tropes are repeated by the White House, members of Congress and the press.“Islamophobia had become the language of a wounded empire, the guttural roar of its malevolent violence turned back from the sands of Iraq and the mountain passes of Afghanistan, and leveled against the mosque down the turnpike, the hijabi in the checkout line, the Sikh behind the cash register—the neighbors who looked like The Enemy,” Blumenthal writes. (READ THE REST...)
YOUTUBE - 11 SEPTEMBRE ET OPÉRATION GLADIO
ARCHIVE - TRUTHSEEKER - 911 AND OPERATION GLADIO
DAILYMOTION - D. GANSER - GLADIO ET LA STRATÉGIE DE LA TENSION
YOUTUBE - Le scandale des armées secrètes de l'Otan, l'OAS et les réseaux stay behind
YOUTUBE - Interview with Daniele Ganser - NATO's Secret Armies
Why Are Israelis With Apparent Prior Knowledge of 9/11 Funding Far Right? - YouTube
Sur ce blog:
Rappel sur les fausses nouvelles (intox) avérées : quand les grands médias diffusaient en boucle des fausses images de Palestiniens en train - a-t-on prétendu - de célébrer les attaques du 11 septembre
"Islamophobia Inc." (2018) un documentaire d'Al Jazeera qui débusque le financement de millions de dollars octroyés par de grandes organisations juives respectables à des groupes islamophobes aux États-Unis
Le rôle disproportionné des juifs et des sionistes dans les réseaux islamophobes de la droite américaine, dans les années qui ont suivi le 11 septembre 2001
Derrière le nouveau mouvement international de droite radicale, une opération de guerre psychologique menée par les forces de l'Otan et du sionisme?
"Hollywood, D.C.": Hollywood et les grands médias américains non seulement grouillent d'agents de la CIA, ils sont entièrement au service de la CIA
Le président du National Endowment for Democracy (marionnettiste du "printemps arabe") est un ancien de l'Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith
Rappel sur les liens de l'ancien dictateur du Panama Manuel Noriega avec le Mossad et la CIA. Autre exemple révélateur du soutien sioniste et américain aux dictateurs anti-révolutionnaires et de l'entraînement des Contras après la Seconde Guerre mondiale.
L'ère messianique reaganienne
Pour aller plus loin que le film "Raisons d'État" (The Good Shepherd, 2006), un nouveau livre sur James Jesus Angleton, liaison entre Israel et la CIA
Rappel: silence médiatique sur la piste pro-israélienne dans les attentats terroristes à l'Anthrax aux USA, juste après le trauma du 11 septembre.
Médias antijuifs? Sur les ondes de MSNBC, discussion sur les néocons responsables de la guerre en Irak pour Israël, leur délirante théorie du complot irakien et leur guerre de cent ans contre le monde arabo-musulman
Qui était tout près du métro de Londres au matin des attentats du 7 juillet 2005?