Kristol: ‘Better’ for US to attack Iran than if Israel did
Sunday, April 4th, 2010
The Obama administration should be seriously considering a strike on Iran, according to neoconservative Fox News contributor Bill Kristol.
An Israeli Deputy Defense Minister said last week that he expected Israel would have to attack Iran within a year. Kristol believes it would be better for the US to attack first.
"I think we have to have a credible threat of force and the preparation to use force against Iran. It would be much better if we used force against -- to delay the Iranian nuclear program than if Israel did and there is no evidence that the US government is being at all serious about the use force there," Kristol told Fox News' Chris Wallace Sunday.(...)
Israel could use tactical nukes on Iran
PNAC KING KRISTOL
Le mouvement juif Néo-conservateur : du trotskisme au bellicisme sioniste
Prêts pour une guerre contre l'Iran diabolisé?
Sarah Palin à la tête du "Tea Party", promue par Bill Kristol
Les néocons derrière Palin
L'ère messianique reaganienne
Dieu merci, le parrain des néocons, Irving Kristol, nous a quitté
Le nouveau PNAC?
Sionisme, psychopathes et 11 septembre
Le 11 septembre n'est plus un mystère
Le vrai parrain s'appelle Bronfman
Test de loyauté sioniste imposé aux membres du gouvernement américain
Vendre la Guerre aux Américains - War Made Easy (V.F.)
FRONTLINE - Israel's Next War ? (PBS)
They do not believe in peace talks. They do not want to share the land.
They are well armed and are carrying out increasingly violent attacks,
even targeting innocent civilians. They are members of Israel's militant
far right, and they are threatening to become Israel's next big problem
Vanunu et l'arsenal nucléaire secret d'Israel (BBC)
Le lobby d'Israel - The influence of AIPAC on US Foreign Policy (V.F.)
Inside Britain's Israel Lobby