Thursday, October 30, 2008

LA FAMILLE MCCAIN ET L'ATTAQUE DU USS LIBERTY

GRATUIT - À LIRE

Chapitre 4 du livre Guilt by Association, du très respecté Jeff Gates.


McCAIN FAMILY SECRET: THE COVERUP

http://www.criminalstate.com/BookExcerpts.aspx

http://whale.to/c/guilt_by_association.html


Plus de détails sur www.criminalstate.com




Guilt by Association makes treason transparent The corruption that plagues American politics is traced to an alliance with elites and extremists loyal to the Land of Israel. Unable to rid politics of campaign finance corruption, the U.S. finds its security imperiled by those skilled at deceiving America into waging wars for the Zionist state. Tracing this corruption to criminal syndicates from the 1920s, Guilt by Association reveals how those skilled at displacing facts with beliefs wield clout from the shadows. Both deception and self-deceit play critical roles in enabling this criminality to expand its reach on a global scale. Guilt by Association documents how—by operating in the realms of politics, media, academia, think tanks and popular culture—corruption came to dominate politics, as shown by presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama. Chronicling systemic corruption that predates these candidates by decades, the book explains how organized crime expanded worldwide while the U.S. discredited itself in the eyes of a global public astounded that Americans would tolerate such corruption to their own detriment. Featuring sophisticated analysis presented in layman’s language, Guilt by Association will transform political debate in the U.S. and beyond. Author, educator, attorney and adviser on financial policy to thirty-five countries, Jeff Gates served seven years as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance (1980-87). His earlier books include The Ownership Solution and Democracy at Risk.




Note : l'auteur Michael Collins Piper l'avait déjà révélé l'hiver dernier :

Doing Israel’s bidding is a McCain family tradition. Following Israel’s 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, resulting in the murder of 34 Americans, McCain’s father, Adm. John McCain, was one of the key players inside the U.S. Navy helping cover up the deliberate nature of Israel's savage attack. “Like father, like son” clearly means something when it comes to the McCains.

À ce sujet, lire aussi Mark Glenn, le survivant du USS Liberty Phil Tourney.






Wednesday, October 29, 2008

LES NÉOCONS SORTENT UNE LAPINE DE LEUR CHAPEAU


THE POWER BEHIND SARAH PALIN, by M.C. Piper (American Free Press)

How a Top U.S. Zionist Picked Sarah Palin for Vice President


Pro-Israel Neo-Con Hand-Picked McCain VP

Zionists pleased as punch fanatical Alaska governor has been pushed to front of U.S. national politics

By Michael Collins Piper — AFP

Win or lose in her bid for the vice presidency, Sarah Palin will nonetheless be a front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012. That’s “good news” to the hard-line pro- Israel cabal — known as the “neo-conservatives” — who brought America to bankruptcy pursuing the war in Iraq and who still dream of war against Iran.

It turns out that one of the chief neo-conservative tacticians—William Kristol, editor of Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s Weekly Standard, and Mrs. Palin’s foremost cheerleader in the mass media—is the very person who hand-picked Palin as John McCain’s running mate.

Both The Washington Post and The Telegraph of London revealed Kristol’s pivotal role in ushering the previously little-known Palin to national prominence. For its part, the Telegraph noted on Sept. 16:

Sources in the McCain camp, the Republican Party and Washington think tanks say Mrs. Palin was identified as a potential future leader of the neo-conservative cause in June 2007. That was when the annual summer cruise organized by the right-of-center Weekly Standard magazine docked in Juneau, the Alaskan state capital, and the pundits on board took tea with Gov. Palin.

The Post reported that the meeting between Palin and Kristol, along with Kristol hanger-on Fred Barnes, was initiated by a member of Palin’s staff.

In any event, the Telegraph added, “her case as John McCain’s running mate was later advanced vociferously by William Kristol,” whose Standard touted Palin — immediately after their meeting—as “the most popular governor” and mentioned her in subsequent issues of The Weekly Standard no less than 40 additional times.

In fact, as early as June 30—at a time when McCain was said to be resisting pressures from those who opposed McCain’s choice of Sen. Joe Lieberman as his running mate—Kristol appeared on Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News and predicted Palin would be McCain’s choice, this at a time when Palin was hardly known outside Alaska.

Writing at the dailybeast.com, Internet blogger Scott Horton pointed out further that:

Kristol is one of the few conservative columnists whose support of Palin has been unflinching. He has used his space as a New York Times columnist to tout her candidacy repeatedly. But in the process Kristol has never bothered to disclose his role in the decision making process that led to the Palin pick. Kristol’s Weekly Standard has figured as Palin’s chief defender, and its writers have gone after even those who dare to pose questions about Palin’s candidacy. Bill Kristol, it seems, has much at stake in the Palin candidacy.

Underscoring the role of the “neo-cons” in grooming Palin, the small-circulation (but highly influential) New Yorker—published by the billionaire Newhouse family (hard-line Zionists known for neo-conservative sympathies)—featured an eye-opening cover story on October 27 entitled “How McCain found Palin,” subtitled “She wanted the nomination—and Washington insiders helped her get it.”

SMALL BUT POWERFUL: Behind Sarah Plain’s desk she displays a symbol of her devotion to Israel in the form of a small but very meaningful Israeli flag (circled). Although liberal Jews don’t like Palin’s stands on social issues, she is revered by pro-Israel hard-liners. Adding to this general conception is the recently revealed fact that neo-con mouthpiece and shill for the Israeli lobby in America, William Kristol of the fanatically Zionist Weekly Standard, was intimately involved in orchestrating her selection as John McCain’s running mate.

The detailed account demonstrated that Palin’s national prominence (and her path to the vice presidential nomination) was entirely the result of concerted propaganda and tactical maneuvering by Kristol and his closest collaborators.

Perhaps more disturbing was the revelation that it was controversial political operative Dick Morris— who earlier helped launch Bill Clinton’s rise in Arkansas and then in the national arena—who was a key player “in” on laying the stage for the until-then-obscure Palin’s introduction to the GOP.

Morris was among another group of neo-cons— associated with the National Review magazine—who landed in Alaska on their own cruise (just a few weeks after the Kristol-Weekly Standard clique held court). The New Yorker said “according to several accounts . . . no connection made that day was more meaningful than the one struck between Palin and Dick Morris.”

It is interesting the New Yorker should unveil the Palin-Morris connection resulting from the National Review stop-over in Alaska: S.I. Newhouse, publisher of the magazine, was a close friend of Morris’s cousin, devout pro-Israel political operative and “mob lawyer” Roy Cohn, who was also close friend of National Review founderWilliam F. Buckley, Jr.

As far back as the mid-1950s—working with Cohn—Buckley was a godfather of the modern neoconservative movement, a transmogrification of the old-line Trotskyite communists (for strategic reasons) into a “new” brand of “conservative internationalism” in opposition to traditional American nationalism. The New Yorker also cited the work of a young conservative, Adam Brickley, who established a website promoting Palin for vice president. It seems as if his website suddenly began getting widespread promotion after the neo-cons began lining up for Palin behind the scenes.

While Brickley said he felt that the longer he worked on the website, “the less I felt I was driving it. Something else was at work.” Brickley said he believed it was “the hand of God,” but the evidence points more directly to earthly elements.

The New Yorker describes the theological background of the Palin booster:

Brickley’s family, once evangelical Christians, now practice what he calls “Messianic Judaism.” They believe that Jesus is the Messiah, but they also observe the Jewish holidays and attend synagogue; as Brickley puts it, “Jesus was Jewish, so to be like Him you need to be Jewish, too.”

Following her selection as McCain’s running mate, Mrs. Palin quickly made it clear she shares the neo-conservative fanaticism for Israel, loudly banging the drum against Iran and bragging that she keeps an Israeli flag in her Alaska office.

Palin’s official foreign policy handlers are two key neo-conservative strategists: Randy Scheunemann and Steve Biegun. One chronicler of the neo-conservatives, author Jacob Heilbrunn, has asserted it’s clear Palin “has soaked up the neo-con view of the world.”

Michael Collins Piper can be heard every week day night live on the Internet at republicbroadcasting.org. He is the author of Final Judgment, the controversial “underground bestseller” documenting the collaboration of Israeli intelligence in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is also the author of The High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America , The Judas Goats, and Dirty Secrets, all available from America First Books and FIRST AMENDMENT BOOKS: 1-888-699-NEWS. He has lectured on suppressed topics in places as diverse as Malaysia, Japan, Canada, Russia and Abu Dhabi.


(Issue #44, November 3, 2008, AMERICAN FREE PRESS)

Read more MCP at MikePiperReport.com, also be sure to checkout his RBN Radio archive!

=--


Sarah Palin–Israel’s ‘Bitch’

‘Bitch’–It’s an ugly word, for sure, and not one I am accustomed to using as cavalierly as some might imagine here. I always winced when I heard it growing up as a kid, mostly because I always held women in such high respect and because I was sure that in 9 out of 10 cases where the word was used it was most likely unjustified. After all, they–women–are the bringers of life and who civilize us (hopefully) through their influence in the home. Can you imagine what a mess the world would be in if it was the guys raising the children instead of the gals? The kids would speak in mono-syllabic grunts rather than full sentences and would settle all issues with their fists instead of their mouths and brains.

So my use of the word ‘bitch’ comes with a LOT of hesitation, believe me. Mz. Palin is the mother of 5 children, and for that she deserves mucho respecto as far as I’m concerned. She–like a good number of women in the ‘Christian’ west these days–could have kneeled at the communion rail of Roe V Wade on many occasions, including when she learned her most recent child would be born with Down’s Syndrome. Instead, she elected to have the chalice pass from her lips, much to the rage of feminists who pay to have their children killed for matters of simple convenience in what has become something of a sacramental rite in America these days, God help us. Despite what I consider to be her seriously-misguided religious ideas concerning Israel and the Jews, I’m sure had she been around in a better time period in this nation’s history–meaning a time when the Jewish state and her spies DID NOT dominate our political system–she would have been a great stateswoman.

Let me clarify further–I use that ‘b’ word in describing her not because she stomps around barking out orders at those around her, complaining about this and that and generally making life hell for everyone in her vicinity. In this case, the word ‘bitch’ encompasses that other use of the word we hear so much these days, meaning ‘whore’, or someone willing to lower herself (or himself) into doing immoral, degrading, and life-threatening things for a fistful of dollars, or, as in the case of our elected representatives, a fistful of political power. As she demonstrated to the world in the last few weeks since her nomination as Republican VP, she–like a streetwalker negotiating with a prospective client over what services she’s willing to perform and for what price–has let it be known she is willing to go ‘all the way’ with Israel’s demands, regardless of how raunchy or immoral these demands are. Not only towing the line with regards to the fatal myth that the Jews are ‘God’s chosen’ and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, namely stealing the real estate between the two ‘great rivers’ of the Nile and the Euphrates as well as the right to murder anyone they see fit at anytime they so decide, she has also embraced the other fatal myths of our modern times as well–that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and that Iran must be stopped at all costs from ‘wiping Israel off the map’. She calls herself ‘pro-life’ but in perfect Zionist double-speak has signaled she will use her office to rain down death on millions, possible even billions of innocent people and all of it for the ‘Jewish cause’. She calls herself a Christian and yet has promised Israel that the Jewish state will continue receiving her daily diet of 15 million dollars from good ole Uncle Sam so she can continue de-Christianizing the land made sacred by the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and in general making life for the Palestinians there a living hell.

And if these weren’t bad enough, Mz. Palin has now gone on record saying that war with Russia is a real likelihood, and not ‘war’ as in the ‘cold’ one but rather the real deal, just as the Neocons have wanted since Trotsky and his gang were ousted from power in the early 20th century.

And so, at least in the political sense, Palin IS a whore, or, using the less-polite language of gangstaz and gangsta-wannabes, ‘a bitch’. By her own admission, she will do anything, no matter how dirty, degrading or immoral it is so that Israel and her supporters ‘get off’ the only way they can, which is through bloodshed, the suffering of innocent people and corruption of otherwise healthy political systems. And in the event some don’t like my choice of racy words here, remember this–I am only following the example set forth by the man destined to replace the aging, swelling John Hagee as Supreme Pontiff of the Christian Zionist movement, none other than pastor Rod Parsley himself, John McCains’s ‘spiritual mentor’ who used the very same racy verbiage when he, speaking about America’s proclivity towards killing Muslims exclaimed like a seasoned snake-handler speaking in tongues ‘We’re bred for battle!…We get off on war!!!

Putting this in better perspective, consider the fact that Palin ‘the patriot’ (as she is now being fashioned by the Jewish mass media in America) is throwing her support behind a Marxist-founded state that has–

1. Blown up American buildings in Egypt in what was known as the Lavon Affair…

2. Attacked a United States ship, the USS Liberty, resulting in the deaths of 34 American sailors with the intention of sinking her so Egypt could be blamed and WWIII started between the US and the USSR…

3. Played an active part in the bombing of the US marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, resulting in the deaths of almost 250 servicemen…

4. Plotted to assassinate George HW Bush at the Madrid peace conference in 1991 in order to–surprise, surprise–’blame the Arabs’…

5. Stole America’s most sensitive national security secrets from her spy Jonathon Pollard and then sold them to America’s enemies at that time, the USSR. If indeed America finds herself at war with Russia as Israel would like to see take place, no doubt these secrets will be used to better kill America’s young men and women, assuming of course that it remains a war solely outside the confines of the US, which is highly doubtful…

6. Played an indispensable role in the attacks of 9/11, so much so that hundreds–let me repeat for emphasis–HUNDREDS of Israeli spies were arrested, some in circumstances as incriminating as filming the Twin Towers coming down and cheering and who later admitted on Israeli TV that they were ‘sent to document the event’…

…and this is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. One day, after this mess is all over and assuming the US has not been reduced to ashes following a nuclear war, there will be an entire wing of the Library of Congress devoted to the problems this nation has endured as a result of Israel and her influence over our affairs.

And this folks is the ugly truth concerning Palin. As I said, were these better times, I would be getting all hot and bothered about her candidacy too, but the fact is that she is there for one reason and one reason only, which is to get an otherwise unelectable John McCain elected president so that the Jews can have the other wars they have scheduled, meaning Iran, Syria and Russia. You can bet your last dollar that were she not ‘right with God’, meaning were she the least bit contrary to Israel and the demands of the Jewish state, be it the war in the Middle East or whatever, she would remain in that obscure, out of the way place and no one would know Jack Squat about her.

The other thing of course to consider, but unmentioned up to this point, is the fact that I am not the only one saying this about her, that she is ‘Israel’s Bitch’, and this is where it gets REALLY ugly. The fact is, this is what the Jewish state and her supporters think of her, their public comments notwithstanding. Yes, guys such as Brooks and Lieberman and all the others may at present be swooning and fawning all over her as if she were Esther reborn, but to them she is just a piece of gentile meat created by God to serve the Jews, what they refer to in their own parlance as a ‘Shiksa’.

Yes, that’s right, all you conservative, bible-believing Christians out there who think that the Jews have finally ‘come around’ and seen the light with regards to the things near and dear to our conservative hearts pertaining to protecting the unborn, the Constitution and ‘family values’ as we define them, the fact is this–She is just another Britney, Madonna, or any other Barbie doll-creation of the Jewish mass media. She–like they–has been shoved out on the stage where–politically-speaking–she bats her eyes, moans and groans, suggestively rubs her hands over her body, wiggles and jiggles and bumps and grinds in front of us and all in the interest of keeping us excited, excitable, and distracted from what the hell is really going on in the world.

And make no mistake about it. All the praise they are heaping on her right now will be short-lived. Keep in mind how the Jews welcomed Jesus into Jerusalem as a king, shouting ‘Hosanna to God in the Highest’ and laying palm leaves in His path and then a week later these same creatures were calling for him to be crucified and the murderer Barabbas released.

No, once Palin has been used for their purposes, meaning once they have gotten from her what they want (meaning getting warmonger John McCain elected to the presidency) the ‘honeymoon’ will be over and she will be told to ‘get the f*** out of here bitch’ just as they would to any ordinary whore whose services were no longer required.

And the real truth is, Mz. Palin has a lot more to worry about than simply being ‘removed’ from the political scene by any scandals that may develop around her. Washington DC–a veritable outpost (in both the literal and figurative sense) of Meyer Lansky’s Murder Inc–has become a gangland where individuals live and die based upon whether they are worth more dead than alive to the powers-that-be. It may very well turn out that what is REALLY planned here is the classic one-two knockout punch, meaning Palin gets McCain elected, and then, batta-bing/batta bang/BATTA-BOOM–she is assassinated by some ‘Islamic terrorist’ and McCain makes Lieberman his VP (which was the original plan anyway) and then when Little Johnnie has some ‘accident’ befall him, Lieberman becomes prez, America falls into Israel’s hands like a ripened fruit and thus all impediments removed from the Jewish state getting what she really wants. Remember–we are talking about people here who believe they are the embodiment of God and who have–not just the capability of doing the worst, but rather the proclivity. After all, lest we forget, it is the Talmud itself, the engine that drives these people and their agenda that states “Tob shebe goyyim harog’, meaning “Even the best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.’

And so, my fellow Americans, fellow humans, lovers of peace and justice, if you think my opinion and the language used in expressing this opinion too harsh concerning that ‘good Christian woman’ Mz. Palin who is most likely destined to be our next vice president (at least until her motorcade is blown up by Al Qaeda) what I say in my defense is thus–I am tired of the non-stop political pornography we see these days…, sick of seeing bitch after bitch after bitch paraded out before us who degrade themselves and degrade what is supposed to be their sacred duties to our nation by whoring themselves out for the benefit of the Madame of the house, Israel. I am sick to the point of vomiting over the manner our elected officials–who swore an oath to be faithful to America, for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in heath, for better or for worse till death do us part as they take turns getting down on their knees and or on all fours and then perform whatever disgusting services are demanded of them by the Jewish state, an insatiable nymphomaniac for political power that never seems to get her fill. I am sick of America suffering from all the ills-political, social, cultural or whatnot, resulting from the legion of venereal diseases we have contracted through our illicit, immoral intercourse with the Jewish state. We have become a sterile, barren woman whose womb is so polluted through immoral behavior that it can no longer produce any life for our nation, meaning peace, prosperity and political stability. I long for the by-gone days of fidelity and continence of American political life, where America was first, second and third in the hearts and minds of our leaders instead of them putting the interests of a terrorist state ahead of our own. I lament the day that men like George Washington, John Adams and others–men who would never have consented to sell their country for 30 pieces of silver to ANY interest nor allow the governing infrastructure of America to be infested with spies and saboteurs as it exists today–were replaced with the likes of George Bush, John McCain and the rest.

It is something we are going to have to decide folks–we are either going to have America as a beacon of light where Lady Liberty runs the show or a brothel dominated by whores for Israel, and as one wise man once said, ‘You cannot serve two masters, for you will either love the one and hate the other or hate the one or love the other.’

For myself, this latest creation in the person of Mz. Palin leaves much to be desired, no matter how low she is willing to go in debasing herself in what has become the Zionist Burlesque Revue. Give me someone not as easy on the eyes but whose love for America does not take 2nd place to the interests of a foreign power and who understands that when she takes that oath of office, what she is really saying to America is ‘for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in heath, for better or for worse till death do us part.’

(c) 2008 Mark Glenn

Correspondent, American Free Press Newspaper

www.americanfreepress.net

www.crescentandcross.com

nomorewarsforisrael@gmail.com

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Les Rothschild et leurs 200 ans d’influence en politique

http://www.texemarrs.com/images/leiberman_mccain_wailing_wall.jpg

Par Andy McSmith
The Independent , jeudi 23 octobre 2008
Nat Rothschild, le financier au centre des accusations qui menacent d’engloutir le ministre des finance du cabinet fantôme britannique, George Osborne, connaît bien les lois qui interdisent aux politiciens d’accepter des dons de l’étranger.
Les dons politiques de l’étranger sont aussi illégaux aux Etats-Unis, où l’équipe de campagne de John McCain fait l’objet d’une enquête, accusée d’avoir accepté un avantage en nature de la part de deux citoyens britanniques ultra-riches, nommément Nat Rothschild et son père, Jacob, le 4ème Baron Rothschild.
En avril dernier, M. McCain est passé par Londres et a fait un discours lors d’un dîner de collecte de fonds pour des expatriés américains, où les sièges aux tables les meilleures marché coûtaient 810 dollars (£500) par tête. Ce qui attira l’attention de Judicial Watch, une fondation basée à Washington consacrée à la lutte contre la corruption, était que cet événement se soit tenu “avec l’aimable autorisation de Lord Rothschild et de l’honorable Nathaniel Rothschild” à Spencer House, la résidence familiale de St James, le seul palais du 17ème siècle privé au centre de Londres.
La Commission Electorale Fédérale (FEC) des Etats-Unis enquête toujours sur l’accusation selon laquelle l’équipe de campagne de M. McCain a violé la loi électorale en acceptant un avantage en nature de la part des Rothschild. “Nous n’avons pas encore de nouvelles de la part de la FEC et nous ne nous attendons pas à en avoir avant la fin de la campagne électorale”, a déclaré Tom Fitton, de Judicial Watch.
La famille Rothschild et la politique ont été étroitement liées pendant des générations, depuis que Nathan Rothschild, qui a fondé la branche anglaise de l’entreprise familiale, a financé la guerre britannique contre Napoléon, il y a deux siècles. Nathan était le fils de Mayer Rothschild, qui a fondé l’entreprise familiale dans le ghetto juif de Francfort au 18ème siècle.
L’année dernière, Serena Rothschild, la mère de Nat Rothschild, était l’une des plus importantes donatrices individuelles du Parti Conservateur. Elle a donné 190.000 livres sterling [240.000 €]. Elle a également aidé à financer le poste de M. Osborne.
Lorsqu’un autre membre du clan, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, a épousé la femme d’affaire new-yorkaise Lynn Forester, ils ont passé leur nuit de noce à la Maison Blanche, en tant qu’invités de Bill Clinton. Lady Rothschild était une collectrice de fonds pour les démocrates, mais elle est passée dans le camp de McCain après que son amie Hillary Clinton a été battue à la nomination par Barack Obama.
Il n’est donc pas nouveau qu’un Rothschild fréquente des politiciens de premier plan – mais ils le font généralement d’une manière qui n’attire pas de publicité inutile. Ce qui est inhabituel à propos de l’intervention soudaine de Nat Rothschild dans l’affaire de l’oligarque [1] et du yacht de Corfou est la façon dont il s’est mis au centre de la scène. Sa motivation présumée est la colère qu’il aurait éprouvé vis-à-vis des mauvaises manières de M. Osborne qui a révélé ce que Peter Mandelson avait dit sur Gordon Brown, lorsque Lord Mandelson, M. Osborne et M. Rothschild étaient les invités du magnat russe de l’aluminium, Oleg Deripaska.
Malgré la photographie désormais célèbre qui montre M. Rothschild et M. Osborne comme des étudiants privilégiés de 21 ans à Oxford, ils n’étaient pas proches amis et leurs chemins ont rapidement bifurqué. Dans les deux ans après que cette photo fut prise, M. Osborne s’installa dans la carrière qu’il s’était choisie en prenant un poste au siège du parti conservateur. Cette même année, Nat Rothschild, ne montrant aucun intérêt à trouver un emploi stable, se mit en couple avec Annabelle Neilson, un mannequin rencontré sur une plage en Inde, s’enfuit vers Las Vegas et l’épousa.
Ses parents horrifiés doivent avoir craint qu’il se dirige dans la même voie autodestructrice que celle de ses deux cousins – Amschel, qui s’est pendu dans un hôtel parisien en 1996, et Rafael, qui est mort d’une overdose d’héroïne, à l’âge de 23 ans à Manhattan.
Mais Nat Rothschild est sorti de ce mariage, rompu trois ans plus tard, en homme neuf. A New York, il a rencontré Timothy Barakett, le fondateur d’Atticus Capital, un fonds spéculatif qui fait des paris souvent risqués sur de larges sommes pour le compte de riches clients. M. Rothschild est devenu coprésident de cette entreprise, laquelle, à son apogée, gérait des investissements de plus de 20 milliards de livres [27 milliards €]. C’était avant le désarroi des marchés financiers – le mois dernier, il a été rapporté que 2,5 milliards de livres [3,4 milliards €] ont été détruits de la valeur des actifs d’Atticus.
Même ainsi, on pense que Nat Rothschild a gagné beaucoup plus d’argent que ce qu’il aurait hérité en tant que plus jeune enfant et seul fils de Jacob Rothschild. Père et fils font à présent équipe et ont co-fondé JNR, un véhicule d’investissement avec des bureaux à Londres et à New York et des intérêts étendus en Russie. C’est Jacob qui a présenté Nat à Peter Mandelson.
NOTE :
_______________________________________
[1] George Osborne, le “ministre de l’Economie” de l’opposition, est accusé d’avoir demandé au magnat russe de l’aluminium, Oleg Deripaska, de financer son parti, ce qui est illégal. Cela se passait pendant ses vacances en Grèce, à Corfou, qu’il passait en compagnie de quelques personnalités extrêmement riches. Parmi ceux-ci, Nathaniel Rothschild, riche membre de la dynastie de banquiers, qui dispose d’une villa de vacances sur cette île grecque. A l’occasion de ce séjour estival, Osborne a en outre rendu visite à l’oligarque russe Oleg Deripaska, l’un des hommes les plus riches de la planète, sur son yacht privé, lequel est, bien sûr, l’un des plus grands du monde.
Pendant ce séjour, Osborne a également rencontré Peter, désormais lord, Mandelson, alors encore commissaire européen au Commerce [devenu ministre du Commerce britannique début octobre]. Jusque-là, cette histoire de riches et célèbres ne suscite qu’un vague sentiment d’étonnement à l’idée que le principal porte-parole des tories pour l’économie puisse frayer avec un adversaire politique tandis qu’au pays les gens s’inquiètent pour leur épargne, leur retraite, leur logement, leur emploi. Et c’est là qu’intervient l’incroyable absence de jugement dont a fait preuve Osborne. Il a fait savoir que, lors de leur idylle ionienne, lord Mandelson avait “craché du pur vitriol” à propos de Gordon Brown à qui voulait bien l’entendre. Puis on a entendu dire que lord Mandelson aurait également rencontré Deripaska, qui a fait fortune dans l’aluminium et a profité de la baisse des droits de douane décidée par la Commission européenne. Ces révélations gênantes ont apparemment provoqué la colère de Rothschild, ce qui n’a rien de surprenant puisqu’elles entachent son rôle d’hôte. En réplique, Rothschild a affirmé que le chancelier de l’Echiquier du cabinet fantôme avait lui aussi vu Deripaska sur son yacht et qu’il était en plus accompagné d’Andrew Feldman, le collecteur de fonds des conservateurs, “pour solliciter un don” [la somme de 50 000 livres, soit plus de 63 000 euros, est avancée par la presse].
__________________________________________
Article original : “The Rothschilds and their 200 years of political influence”
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-rothschilds-and-their-200-years-of-political-influence-969772.html

Traduction
http://questionscritiques.free.fr









VIDEOS:
McCain's Bronfman connection, by Mike Piper
John McCain at the Wailing Wall
John McCain: the neocon kosher candidate
McCain accepts improper donations from Rothschilds!




Who are the Bronfmans? (pt 2. - 3. - 4. - 5. - 6. -)