mardi 29 janvier 2013

Les massmédias anti-juifs? Netanyahou caricaturé le jour de la mémoire de l'Holocauste

Jewish groups slam U.K.’s Sunday Times for publishing ‘Jewish blood libel’ cartoon on Holocaust day
The European Jewish Congress on Sunday demanded that the Sunday Times apologize for publishing a cartoon depicting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu building a wall on top of Palestinians with their blood standing in for cement.
The uproar that erupted over the cartoon was particularly offensive due to its publication on International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Du même caricaturiste qui créa l'imagerie du film The Wall de Pink Floyd.

Un caricaturiste britannique va-t-il subir le même sort que Dieudonné pour avoir critiqué Israël ?

Rupert Murdoch, whose News Corp. owns the Sunday Times of London through a subsidiary, said the paper should apologize for...


Illustrator of anti-Israel cartoon apologizes for timing of publication This anti-Israel cartoon that appeared in the Sunday Times of London on International Holocaust Remembrance Day was called a 'modern day evocation of the ancient blood libel charge.' (From Sunday Times)

Israel to Demand Apology for ‘Anti-Semitic’ Netanyahu Cartoon

Netanyahu caricature: Beyond apologies Beyond apologies: Blood libel cartoon Op-ed: Who helped strengthen genocidal image that so many British people hold regarding Israel? 

German daily caricatures Bibi PM drawn with toxin bottle marked 'settlements.' Israeli embassy in Berlin delivers letter to editor

Jewish groups led by the American Jewish Congress (AJC) has demanded that popular German daily Stuttgarter Zeitung apologize to Jewish people for publishing a cartoon which implies that Netanyahu is ready to kill the latest Israel-Palestinian peace talks initiated by John Kerry.(Cartoon below )Editors Note
The caricature (top left) shows Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu sitting on a park bench, pouring poison from a bottle labeled “settlement construction” over a piece of bread which apparently he intends to feed to a (Mahmoud Abbas) Palestinian peace dove.
“Israel lobby” used pressure and false allegations as leverage to pressure the institution to break an existing contract.
by Dr. Ludwig Watzal
13th August 2013. Due to the pressure from the “Israel lobby”, events and exhibitions about Palestine can hardly take place in Germany anymore. The pro- Zionist “Israel lobby” is well organized. When an event is announced publicly, perfectly organized machinery is set in motion, which exercises massive pressure on those who provide the premises for a Palestinian event. Consequently, it has become almost impossible to have an open discussion about Israel’s brutal occupation and the colonization in Palestine.

The latest “success” of the public bullying of organizations was garnered in Berlin. The cultural department of the Iranian Embassy in Berlin wanted to organize a conference entitled “Palestine – Peace based on justice” on Friday, August 16, 2013 at the educational institution “Urania”. All formalities were cleared. Speakers were committed among them the journalist Petra Wild who just published a book entitled “Apartheid and ethnic cleansing of Palestine: The Zionist settler colonialism in word and deed”, the film-makers Stefanie Landgraf and Johannes Gulde who’s film “We refuse to be enemies” was highly acclaimed but also defamed by the lobby in cooperation with one of the cities deputy majors in Nuremberg, Dr. Gabi Weber who runs the organization “Café Palestine” in Freiburg, Raif Hussein, the chairman of the German-Palestine society, and Dr. Yavuz Özoguz who operates the website “Muslim Market” who is also regularly defamed.

Because of the extent of bullying from the “Israel lobby”, the director of “Urania”, Dr. Ulrich Bleyer, unceremoniously pulled back the already given commitment. In addition to the usual extremist suspects,1 the chairman of the German-Israeli society, Reinhold Robbe (SPD), wrote a letter2 to Bleyer in which he not only misquoted the newly elected Iranian President Hassan Rohani, but also sets this misquotation in relation to the unspeakable German historical past. In this case, the “Israel lobby” used pressure and false allegations as leverage to pressure the institution to break an existing contract.

Dr. Bleyer wrote inter alia to the Iranian Embassy: “The program and the research on the speakers can clearly expect that our statutory goal of international understanding, which is also defined in the terms of our agreements as a condition of hire is not respected.” Why didn’t the director of “Urania” inform himself beforehand? He further was afraid that the speakers could challenge “Israel’s right to exist” and legitimize terrorism as “a form of resistance against an occupying power”. Dr. Bleyer expected a “large number of protesters”, and “that there will be clashes during the event or at the Urania.” The threats in the protest letters must have been so intimidating that he has canceled the event.

Cafe Palestine and Dr. Gabi Weber are increasingly in the crosshairs of this lobby, too. It prevented a lecture by Prof. Christophe Oberlin of the University of Paris on the topic “Plastic Surgery in Gaza” at the University of Freiburg. The lobby is always operating on the same pattern. Defame and put pressure on the institutions hoping that the Germans are already buckling which they regularly do. “Café Palestine” had to sue the University before the Administrative Court in Freiburg and won.3

Early this year, British Jewish lobby groups chased daily The Sunday Times for publishing Gerald Scarfe’ cartoon which depicted Israeli prime minister Netanyahu “a blood thirsty Israeli”.
Early this year, British Jewish lobby groups chased daily The Sunday Times for publishing Gerald Scarfe’ cartoon which depicted Israeli prime minister Netanyahu “a blood thirsty Israeli”.

Bonn – Another object of “desire” of the lobby is the traveling exhibition “Nakba – flight and expulsion of Palestinians in 1948″, which is organized by “Refugee children in Lebanon”, headed by Ms. Ingrid Rumpf. The organizers and the local authorities are put under pressure by German-Jewish and Israeli organizations. The goal is not about the discourse on this dubious chapter in the history of Israel. With the argument that the issue is one-sided and tendentious whose prohibition is required and sometimes enforced. Like always, the “brave” Germans buckle.

The problem is not so much the “power” of the “Israel lobby” but rather the submissiveness of their German “friends”. If the lobby cannot rely on their uncritical and vile support, they can easily refute because the lobby does not have real arguments. Chas Freeman, a former U. S. ambassador, was bullied by the “Israel lobby” before he could even take a job in the Obama administration. His characterization of this form of public bullying holds also true for the German branch4: “The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, and the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth.”
It is high time for the Germans to recognize that the commitment for freedom in Palestine has become a fight for our own freedom of speech. Let aside the totalitarian control of all the peoples of the world by the U. S. Empire.
Dr. Ludwig WatzalDr. Ludwig Watzal works as a journalist and editor in Bonn, Germany. He runs the bilingual blog

Sur ce blog:

Un sinistre canadien dénonce le complot onusien-médiatique contre Israël 

Les massmédias anti-juifs? Un Tweet d'une correspondante de la BBC à Washington réfère au pouvoir et à l'argent du lobby juif

Les massmédias antisémites? Le Washington Post rapporte que le virus Flame serait, comme Stuxnet, une cyber-arme us-israélienne contre l'Iran

Maîtres du monde, maîtres de l'humour: Netanyahou accuse le New York Times et Haaretz de donner le ton de la campagne anti-Israël à travers le monde

Moins d'argent juif de New York pour Obama, plus d'argent juif de Las Vegas pour Romney 

Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d'un journal juif américain, soutient qu'il ne prônait pas vraiment l'assassinat d'Obama

Une comique juive au parlement israélien: je ne voulais pas heurter la mémoire de la Shoah en dénonçant le cancer de l'immigration africaine en Israël

Le premier prix de caricature du mouvement Occupy en Iran

Même Reuters n'est pas à l'abri du congrès juif européen et de son président milliardaire

samedi 19 janvier 2013

Bush, Rockefeller, Rothschild et Hitler

Bush, Rockefeller, Rothschild et Hitler
Par Michael Collins Piper,  pour American Free Press. 28 janvier 2013

Certains lecteurs de American Free Press ont été choqués par les deux premiers articles de cette série proposant une réflexion sur la prolifération des mythes, de documents bidons et de "citations" frauduleuses venant troubler les recherches sérieuses sur les grandes questions de l'heure et les événements du passé. Or, le travail de l'AFP est de rapporter les faits.

Cette semaine, nous jetterons un coup d’oeil sur un mythe particulièrement répandu -- ou plutôt une combinaison de mythes --  qui en a enthousiasmé plusieurs: il s'agit d'une variété d’allégations à l'effet que les familles Bush, Rockefeller et Rothschild et une foule de "banquiers juifs" -- ensemble ou séparément -- auraient contribué à financer la montée au pouvoir d'Hitler.

La source la plus citée en ce qui concerne l'histoire des banquiers juifs ayant aidé Hitler est Hitler’s Secret Backers, soi-disant par un banquier juif du nom de Sidney Warburg.

Tout d'abord, Sidney Warburg n'a jamais existé. Mais ceux qui ont vraiment lu ce livre d'origine douteuse qui relève clairement de la fumisterie (et la plupart de ceux qui le citent ne l'ont pas lu) savent que l'auteur inconnu dit -- contrairement à ce que les gens croient qu'il dit -- que les banquiers juifs n'ont pas financé Hitler. Au lieu de cela, le livre prétend que quelques vilains banquiers non-juifs l'ont fait.

Mais cela aussi n'est pas vrai. Une évaluation précise par James Pool dans Who Financed Hitler?  (gratuit sur réfute absolument la légende voulant que de gros intérêts bancaires ou industriels aient joué un rôle important dans le financement d'Hitler. La plupart de l'argent du parti nazi provenait de petites contributions et des ventes de littérature.

Aucun Rothschild n'a soutenu Hitler. C'est un mythe. Un banquier, chrétien pratiquant avec un quart de sang juif, a -- selon une source, qui relayait une rumeur -- donné de l'argent à Hitler. Et c'est tout. Le seul banquier juif connu pour avoir donné de l'argent à un quelconque nazi l'a donné à des éléments au sein du parti nazi -- les frères Strasser -- qui tentaient de stopper Hitler.

Et Hitler ne descendait pas de quelque famille Rothschild ou Frankenberger. S'il avait du sang juif, cela n'a jamais été retracé de manière concluante.

Un promoteur de l'allégation selon laquelle Hitler était juif cite La Vienne d'Hitler de Brigitte Hamann comme preuve, en soulignant que le livre relate des histoires sur l'héritage juif d'Hitler. En fait, Hamann dissèque ces contrevérités, les réfutant en détail. Des spécialistes tels que Carolyn Yeager ( et Veronica Clark, dans la série Warwolves of the Iron Cross, ont également démoli ces rumeurs.

Certains disent qu'Hitler était pro-sioniste. Ils ont tort. Pendant une brève période Hitler a encouragé certains sionistes dans leurs efforts visant à promouvoir l'immigration des juifs d'Allemagne vers la Palestine, tel que décrit dans le livre de Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement. Toutefois, au même moment, d'autres forces sionistes en appelaient dès 1933 à la guerre contre Hitler.

La légendaire "collaboration nazi-sioniste" ne fut qu'un petit aparté sans conséquence géopolitique réelle. Mais elle a quand même fournit l'occasion pour de mémorables débats sur Internet.

D'autres s'agitent hystériquement autour du fait que des banques et des sociétés américaines ont collaboré avec le régime nazi, et pourtant -- malgré la frénésie -- ce n'est ni une révélation majeure ni un fait extraordinaire. Ce sont des ententes bien connues, qui remontaient parfois à plusieurs décennies et qui étaient conclues avec le gouvernement allemand au pouvoir quel qu'il fût.

Plusieurs pensent qu'Antony Sutton a "prouvé" dans Wall Street et la montée d'Hitler que la Standard Oil contrôlée par Rockefeller a financé Hitler. Toutefois, dans son livre, Sutton dit catégoriquement: "Standard Oil n'a apparemment pas financé l'accession d'Hitler au pouvoir."

Certains citent ce même livre comme preuve que la famille Bush, de concert avec les intérêts bancaires Harriman, aurait financé Hitler. En fait, Sutton dit seulement que les Harriman -- comme de nombreux groupes financiers américains -- avaient des liens avec les intérêts des entreprises en Allemagne. Et il conclut que cela "ne suggère pas que les Harriman aient directement financé Hitler". À aucun moment il ne fait mention des Bush.

Une autre rumeur soutient que les Bush faisaient partie d'un "complot fasciste" pour renverser Franklin Roosevelt, citant souvent Jules Archer, The Plot to Seize the White House. S'il y avait bien un plan pour déloger FDR -- ce que de nombreux patriotes voient comme une bonne chose -- le livre ne mentionne pas même une seule fois les Bush, et il n'y a d'ailleurs aucune autre preuve qu'ils aient eu quelque chose à voir avec ce complot.

Comme disait le Sgt. Joe Friday: "Juste les faits".

Michael Collins Piper est un auteur, journaliste, conférencier et animateur d'émission de radio. Il a donné des conférences en Russie, en Malaisie, en Iran, à Abu Dhabi, au Japon, au Canada et aux États-Unis. Il est l'auteur de Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant et The Golem.


By Michael Collins Piper. Jan 18, 2013

Some AMERICAN FREE PRESS readers were upset by the first two articles in this series reflecting on the proliferation of myths, phony documents and fraudulent “quotations” muddying serious research into big issues of the day and events of the past. However, AFP’s job is to report the facts.
This week, we take a look at one particularly ubiquitous myth—a combination of myths—which has excited many: A variety of claims the Bush, Rockefeller and Rothschild families and a host of “Jewish bankers”—together or independently—helped finance Hitler’s rise to power.
The most cited source for the story Jewish bankers paved the way for Hitler is Hitler’s Secret Backers, supposedly by a Jewish banker named Sidney Warburg.
First of all, there was no Sidney Warburg. But those who actually read the spurious book (and most who cite it haven’t read it) will find the unknown author says—in contrast to what people think he said—that Jewish bankers didn’t finance Hitler. Instead, the book claims some naughty non-Jewish bankers did so.
But even that isn’t true. An accurate assessment by James Pool in Who Financed Hitler absolutely refutes the legend big banking or industrial interests played a substantial role funding Hitler. Most of the Nazi Party’s money came from small contributions and sales of literature.
No Rothschilds backed Hitler. That’s a myth. One banker, a practicing Christian of one-quarter Jewish descent, was said—by one source, passing on a rumor—to have donated money to Hitler. And that’s it. The one Jewish banker known to have given money to any Nazis gave it to elements in the Nazi party—the Strasser brothers—who were trying to stop Hitler.
And Hitler wasn’t descended from any Rothschilds or Frankenbergers. If he had any Jewish blood, it has never been authoritatively traced.
One proponent of the claim Hitler was Jewish cites Brigitte Hamann’s Hitler’s Vienna as proof, pointing out the book describes stories of Hitler’s Jewish heritage. In fact, Hamann dissects the legends, refuting them in detail. Scholars such as Carolyn Yeager and Veronica Clark, in Warwolves of the Iron Cross, have also demolished the rumors.
Some claim Hitler was pro-Zionist. They are wrong. For a brief period Hitler did encourage some Zionists in efforts to promote Jewish immigration from Germany to Palestine, as described in Edwin Black’s The Transfer Agreement. However, at the same time, other Zionist forces were calling for war against Hitler as early as 1933.
The legendary “Nazi-Zionist collaboration” was a tiny blip of no geopolitical consequence. But it makes for great Internet chatter.
Others are hysterical over the fact American banks and corporations worked with the Nazi regime, yet—despite the frenzy—this is neither a major revelation nor is it extraordinary.
These were well-known arrangements, sometimes going back decades, with whatever German government was in power.
Many think that Antony Sutton “proved” in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler that Rockefeller-controlled Standard Oil funded Hitler. However, in his book, Sutton says flatly: “Standard Oil apparently did not finance Hitler’s accession to power.”
Some cite that same book as evidence the Bush family, with the Harriman banking interests, funded Hitler. In fact, Sutton says only that the Harrimans—like many American financial groups—had connections to corporate interests in Germany. And he concludes that this “does not suggest that the Harrimans directly financed Hitler.” He never mentions the Bushes at all.
Another rumor claims the Bushes were part of a “fascist plot” to overthrow Franklin Roosevelt, often citing Jules Archer’s The Plot to Seize the White House. While there was a scheme to dislodge FDR—which many patriots believe to have been a good thing—the book never mentions the Bushes, nor is there any other evidence they had anything to do with that plot.
As Detective Sergeant Joe Friday used to say: “Just the facts.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

Conspiracy Series Draws Angry Responses

By Michael Collins Piper
An almost audible sensation of palpable panic swept through the ranks of truth seekers as word spread about my recent series confronting, dissecting and laying to rest some myths, phony documents and fraudulent “quotations” that are iconic to many patriots. Some folks got angry because the truth contradicted popular long-cherished rumors and widely circulated downright lies people have come to accept as fact.
One reader threatened to cancel her subscription when she read that, in its next issue, AFP would demolish the widely believed (though false) stories that the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Bushes joined together to bring Hitler to power.
This lady didn’t even wait to read the article. So devoted to the myths, she couldn’t bear the thought of them being disproven.
Another reader sent an angry email in response to that article asking, “How could you defend the Bushes?” when the article in AFP—long a foremost critic of the Bush dynasty—did not defend those gangsters but simply pointed out that so-called “evidence” purporting to “prove” they financed Hitler was just not true.
The reaction to my series demonstrates—too clearly—that the Internet has become a potentially dangerous “echo chamber” in which patriots talk to each other, often relying on unknown sources of information to supply what is often unreliable, even deliberately forged data to debate and disseminate.
What often happens is that agents of the power elite—those forces who control the media, the Federal Reserve monopoly and the international New World Order system—pose as “patriots,” say many of the “right things” and then proceed to spread their nonsense among patriots.
But because the enemy agents seem trustworthy—and since their “scoops” aren’t coming (at least not openly) from the garbage men of the rightly hated establishment media—real patriots tend to put their faith in the disinformation and unwittingly pass it on to others.
The consequence of this type of interaction, in what amounts to a virtual closed society, is that insidious elements take advantage of this circling-of-the-wagons by truth seekers and infiltrate Judas Goats and agents provocateurs into the midst of the good people to advance their own evil (although sometimes murky) agendas. Thus, patriots are misdirected, mis-used and set up for a fall.
One author has written of how one infamous cult shapes the worldview of its own members:
The totalist paradigm begins with shutting off the individual’s access to the outside world, so that his perceptions of reality can be manipulated without interference. The goal at this stage is to provoke expectable patterns of behavior that will appear to arise spontaneously. . . . Those who are beingmanipulatedmay come to endorse the goals andmeans of the group . . . or simply abandon the will to resist. In either case, the individual is robbed of the chance for independent action or self-expression.
Bottom line: Patriots need to keep their eyes and minds open and not be drawn into a whirlpool of propaganda and disinformation—a descent into a maelstromof frenzied rumors and hysterical and reckless behavior leading to public repudiation, even disaster.

"Les financiers juifs ont secrètement financé l'anti-Juif Hitler":
bel exemple de gros mensonge!
(On est plus facilement berné par un gros mensonge que par un petit, donc plus c'est gros mieux ça passe.)

On partit à cet égard de ce principe très juste que, du plus grand des mensonges, l'on croit toujours une certaine partie : la grande masse du peuple laisse en effet plus facilement corrompre les fibres les plus profondes de son cœur qu'elle ne se lancera, volontairement et consciemment, dans le mal : aussi, dans la simplicité primitive de ses sentiments, sera-t-elle plus facilement victime d'un grand mensonge que d'un petit. Elle ne commet elle-même, en général, que de petits mensonges, tandis qu'elle aurait trop de honte à en commettre de grands.
  Elle ne pourra pas concevoir une telle fausseté et elle ne pourra pas croire, même chez d'autres, à la possibilité de ces fausses interprétations, d'une impudence inouïe : même si on l'éclaire, elle doutera, hésitera longtemps et, tout au moins, elle admettra encore pour vraie une explication quelconque qui lui aura été proposée.  Qu'il reste toujours quelque chose des plus impudents mensonges, c'est un fait que les plus grands artistes en tromperie et que les associations de trompeurs ne connaissent que trop bien et qu'ils emploient dès lors bassement. (Adolf Hitler, Mon combat)

Sunday, January 13, 2013

The Piper Report 2013.01.13

Michael discuses various topics such as, Sandy Hook massacre conspiracy theories, the sinking of the Titanic, the relationship between Jews and Hitler, and more.

Mike Piper

32k CF Download

Le  mensonge d' "Hitler meilleur ami des juifs et instrument de la finance cosmopolite" fait partie d'une campagne de désinformation, semblable au mensonge shoatique mais pour les "petits malins", qui était utilisée autrefois dans la propagande communiste et juive (ce qui inclut les services de renseignement alliés---l'élite au service de la haute finance internationale).

Le Mythe du complot fasciste chez les intellectuels communistes (1945-1950)

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Du mythe des "nazis pro-Israël" et de ceux qui voient des complots partout...

Les nazis ont fait la vie dure aux Rothschild, confisqué leurs avoirs

Le mythe des origines juives d'Hitler

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Le jeu des comparaisons: l'islamisme radical est-il plus proche du nazisme ou des "inglourious basterds"?

Comment le Lend-Lease de FDR a sauvé l'Union Soviétique

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste (donc anti-nazie) des Rothschild

L'empire mondial anglo-américain: une marionnette des Rothschild?

Gordon Duff décline l'invitation de Carolyn Yeager sous prétexte qu'elle ignore que la "connexion Bush-nazis"

Duff a tort sur l’Holocauste et les prétendus liens Bush-Hitler

L' "antisioniste" juif Gordon Duff admet écrire 40% de faussetés et poster 30% de faussetés sur son site Veteran Today

Une contre-vérité tenace: "Prescott Bush, un nazi!"

Jabotinsky avait planifié l'assassinat d'Hitler et de hauts dirigeants du IIIe Reich

La conjuration contre l'Esprit - Les arrières-plans occultes du "nouvel ordre mondial"

L'Histoire contemporaine: une "fable convenue"

Le plus beau dans nos chères démocraties, c'est qu'on n'a pas à s'inquiéter pour sa liberté d'opinion et d'expression.... N'EST-CE PAS?

Adolf le Grand diffamé par des "nationalistes" -- Y a-t-il un autre homme dans l'histoire, à part peut-être Jésus, qui ait été à ce point calomnié? 

REPÉRÉ: Un saboteur à la tête du "mouvement" pour la vérité

dimanche 2 décembre 2012

Nationalistes européens: la haine anti-Hitler

Lors de recherches sur internet, je découvre un blog anti-sioniste assez particulier qui se nomme " Le Gentil/L'observateur du péril innommable" , au départ, tout porte a croire qu'il s'agit d'un blog anti sioniste lambda, mais en cherchant bien, nous y trouvons des articles d'analyses très pertinentes et fortement courageuses.

En effet, il évoque un sujet dont nus parlons presque jamais, un sujet presque tabou, c'est cet acharnement "anti-Hitler" de la part de certains nationalistes et autres anti-sionistes.

Tout comme l'animateur de ce blog, je n'ai moi-même jamais compris l'attitude qui pousse un Alain SoraI ou autres personnalités, pourtant qui ne manquent pas de qualités, a critiquer Adolf Hitler, un des hommes les plus diabolisés de l'histoire moderne, pour avoir osé se battre pour relever son pays et extirper la mafia des financiers vampires qui affaiblissaient l'Allemagne, et l'Europe.

C'est faire preuve d'aveuglement, ou pire encore, d'une extrême couardise, de vouloir se dédouaner en critiquant Adolf Hitler, disant e lui qu'il est un médiocre, un fanatique, un sanguinaire, etc..etc...

Nous pouvons ne pas partager les idéaux d'Hitler quand on est antisioniste, personne n'y est obligé, mais de là a insulter sa mémoire pour justifier son anti-sionisme, c'est malhonnête, très malhonnête.

Je vous laisse découvrir ce blog, beaucoup de vérités y sont dites.

Is Germany the Ultimate ‘Rogue Nation’?
New book decisively counters the myth of “German villainy”

By Michael Collins Piper

Benton L. Bradberry’s The Myth of German Villainy is a book about which this reviewer can absolutely say, “I wish I’d written it myself.” The other thing that can be said with certainty about The Myth of German Villainy is this: Every American patriot needs to read this book, particularly those who have—quite unsurprisingly—bought into a lot of the nonsense about 20th century history pawned off by the controlled media and bought-and-paidfor historians shilling for the New World Order elite. Much of their nonsense has managed to find its way even into the “alternative” media (particularly on the Internet) today.
A U.S. naval officer and aviator for 22 years with a degree in political science and international relations from the Naval Post Graduate School in Monterey, Bradberry has given readers a fast-moving, fascinating and well-written 440- page masterwork that accomplishes what few books can do.
It deconstructs a complex and wide-ranging array of historical data (covering a broad expanse of time) and makes it accessible and interesting.
More importantly, it explodes the lies and propaganda about the subject matter that has predominated in the mass media for what has now been several generations.
Scholarly—but nonetheless straightforward and easy to read—this is a comfortable book about many uncomfortable topics, precisely because it constitutes a comprehensive, head-on correction of the multiple historical distortions and outright lies that have accompanied standard “mainstream” and now even “alternative” writings on this subject. And beforemore sensitive readers get too excited and sidetracked, let it be said right up front that The Myth of German Villainy is not a book about “the Holocaust” and whether it did—or didn’t—happen as New World Order-sponsored history books claim. Instead, this book focuses on the often-forgotten bigger picture: the perennial mischaracterization of Germany as the 20th century’s most audacious warmonger, an aggressive, armed colossus bent on conquest of Europe, if not the world itself.
While everyone today “knows”—having been told so repeatedly—that Germany under Adolf Hitler was the big, bad bully who started World War II, few remember (if they ever knewit in the first place) that the same people who decided Germany was guilty of causing the Second World War had also declared that Germany was responsible for provoking the First World War.
However, in The Myth of German Villainy, the author skillfully dissects a remarkable and complex conglomeration of diplomatic intrigue and global power politics at its highest and lowest order. He demonstrates, beyond any question, that Germany was the real victim of both World War I and World War II. Rather than being the instigator of war, Germany was instead the target of British aggression, precisely because the “new Germany” that arose under Hitler stood in direct challenge to the aims of imperial Britain, which had for all intents and purposes emerged as the global armof thewould-beworld empire of the Rothschild banking family based in the City of London. It’s all about money.
And if you follow the money, it will take you right back to the international intrigues of the Rothschilds and their propagandists in the controlled media who have done so much to stilt the truths about history that Bradberry bends back into reality. Among other things, the author accurately summarizes life in Germany under Hitler—the truth about which is far from the average depiction of a Gestapo-run tyranny, a popular (and quite mythical) image unfortunately perpetuated in a lot of “patriot” publications today. Bradberry also delves into the ugly history of communism and how that failed system—at its pinnacle—was responsible for somuchwar and bloodshed that set the stage for Germany’s frontline challenge to this rampaging force that posed a direct challenge to the very survival of Western Christian Civilization.
There is much more that could be said about this wonderful book, but let this final point be noted: As an honest, objective primer on the long-hidden realities of 20th-century history as it relates to the events of both world wars—and their aftermath—you will search far and wide to find anything that does such a fine job in bringing history into accord with the facts.
Get Your Copy of the January/February 2014 Issue of TBR
By Michael Collins Piper
The January/February issue of THE BARNES REVIEW is a very special issue of THE BARNES REVIEW. Why? There aren’t many magazines anywhere—maybe we should say “there aren’t any magazines anywhere”—that would take the position that Adolf Hitler, rather than being a monstrous mass murderer, was in fact a hero to his people.
Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.
The truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany (both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different fromwhat has been painted by the mass media and academia.
There’s much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle in the bigger picture.
That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to where we are today.
So we are especially interested in hearing from potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s underlying message is all about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the wall of lies about history.
To get a copy of this issue for $10, send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call 1-877-773-90771-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price of $46 (U.S.) and send you all new issues as they are published (five more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 6 when responding.

‘Best Ever’—‘Most Controversial’ Issue of TBR Yet?
By Michael Collins Piper
The January/February issue of THE BARNES REVIEW is a very special issue. Why? There aren’t many magazines anywhere—maybe we should say “there aren’t any magazines anywhere”—that would take the position that Adolf Hitler, rather than being a monstrous mass murderer, was in fact a hero to his people.
Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.
The truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany (both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different from what has been painted by the mass media and academia.
There’s much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle in the bigger picture.
That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to where we are today.
So we are especially interested in hearing from potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s mission is all about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the wall of lies about history.
To get a copy of this issue for $10, send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call 1-877-773-90771-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price of $46 (U.S.) and send you all newissues as they are published (five more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 7 when responding.

Satan the Father of All Lies
By Willis Carto [du nom de famille français Carteau], Founder of American Free Press
Despite all the historical truth that is available from AMERICAN FREE PRESS and our history journal, THE BARNES REVIEW, there is still a surprising number of seemingly good patriots who believe certain fabrications—much of it old war-time propaganda—that circulate in the mass media today. It is as if these folks don’t believe much of anything the media tells them except when it comes to the subject of World War II, and Adolf Hitler, in particular.
There are more than a few hustlers who are guilty of this but one who recently came to my attention is Donald Mc Ilvaney, who sells precious metals from what he calls an “explicitly Christian, conservative” perspective. A recent McIlvaney newsletter, relating to Hitler, was so full of nonsense I was moved to write the author and tell him so.
McIlvaney referred to Hitler’s “seizure of control” in Germany. I reminded him Hitler had the backing of over 90 percent of the German people. Cautioning him that his criticisms of Hitler were hardly a position for a professed “anti-communist” to take, I pointed out it was Hitler who turned back communist leader Josef Stalin’s plan to invade and occupy Europe. Without Hitler’s leadership, all of Europe would have fallen to Stalin. The fact is that the West therefore owes Hitler a great debt.
Mc Ilvaney suggested that Hitler started World War II. In fact—as I explained to this self-styled “intelligence advisor”—the record clearly shows Hitler did literally everything to avoid war with England and the United States. It was England that declared war on Germany, not the other way around. And even after war erupted, Hitler still hoped for peace and sought to avoid further bloodshed, even permitting nearly 200,000 English soldiers to evacuate Dunkirk—men the Germans could easily have killed or captured.
Unfortunately, Hitler was forced to deal with the drunken Winston Churchill and the mentally sick Franklin D. Roosevelt, who lusted after war, knowing it would bring him a third and fourth term.
Prior to FDR, all presidents—following the example of George Washington—restricted their tenure to two terms.
Here’s how I assessed the matter for McIlvaney: “FDR and Churchill wanted war and they got it. Everyone who died in that unnecessary and destructive struggle was killed needlessly—at least 27,226,000 innocent Europeans. The piling up of debt to pay for it is something you should be interested in. American taxpayers are still paying for that and will be so long as the dollar lasts. You, with your enchantment with numbers, should know that.”
I told Mc Ilvaney he needs to study authentic, Revisionist history, not Establishment, Jewish propaganda. As a Bible-believing Christian, Mc Ilvaney surely realizes no one may serve two masters—that Satan is the father of lies.
If Mc Ilvaney—and a lot of other “patriot” writers and broadcasters I won’t mention by name just now—intend to talk about history, they need to get their facts straight and stop passing on hallucinations and flat out lies.

VIDEO - Red Ice Radio: VKC vs Nazi Conspiracy Theories - Hour 2
VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian on Joshua Blakeney's NAM

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Ethnicity, Nationalism And Pseudo False Flags

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - The Union Jack

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - World Menace

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Debunking Eustace Mullins Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Reichstag Fire And Kristallnacht

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - The Gleiwitz Incident: Nazi False Flag or Media Hoax? - Hour 1

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Mengele Myths and More

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Hitler HImmler Uncensored

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Histroian - Hitler in Argentina?

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Hess, Hitler And Swiss Bankers

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian And Heink - Evil Nazis, Yanki Polls and Jewzi Emigration

VIDEO - W.K. WW2 Historian - Anti German Myths And Communist Subversion

« Qui donc a mis comme ça Rothschild sous les verrous ? pour spéculations ? C’est pas Schussnig, c’est pas Cachin, c’est pas Jouhaux, c’est pas Blum, c’est pas Chamberlain, c’est pas Staline, c’est Hitler. 
Quel est le véritable ennemi du capitalisme ? C’est le fascisme. Le communisme est un truc de Juif, un moyen d’asservir le peuple plus vachement encore, absolument à l’oeil. Quel est le véritable ami du peuple ? Le Fascisme. 
Qui a le plus fait pour l’ouvrier ? L’U.R.S.S. ou Hitler? C’est Hitler. 
Y a qu’à regarder sans merde rouge plein les yeux. 
Qui a fait le plus pour le petit commerçant ? C’est pas Thorez, c’est Hitler ! 
Qui nous préserve de la Guerre ? C’est Hitler ! 
Les communistes (juifs ou enjuivés), ne pensent qu’à nous envoyer à la bute, à nous faire crever en Croisades. 
Hitler est un bon éleveur de peuples, il est du côté de la Vie, il est soucieux de la vie des peuples, et même de la nôtre. C’est un Aryen. » 
Céline, l’école des cadavres , 1938

Du mythe voulant qu'Hitler ait été sioniste

« Une partie de sa race se reconnaît ouvertement pour un peuple étranger, non sans d’ailleurs commettre un nouveau mensonge. (…) Ils ( les sionistes ) n’ont pas du tout l’intention d’édifier en Palestine un État juif pour aller s’y fixer ; ils ont simplement en vue d’y établir l’organisation centrale de leur entreprise charlatanesque d’internationalisme universel ; elle serait ainsi douée de droits de souveraineté et soustraite à l’intervention des autres États ; elle serait un lieu d’asile pour tous les gredins démasqués et une école supérieure pour les futurs bateleurs. » (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf)

Discours du Führer devant le Reichstag, 28 avril 1939:

"Mais je dois aussi attirer l'attention de M. Roosevelt sur une ou deux erreurs dans l'histoire. Il mentionne l’Irlande, par exemple, et demande une déclaration à l'effet que l'Allemagne n'attaquera pas l'Irlande. Maintenant, je viens de lire un discours prononcé par M. de Valera, le Premier ministre Irlandais, curieusement, et contrairement à l'opinion de M. Roosevelt, il n’accuse pas l’Allemagne d’opprimer l'Irlande, mais reproche à l'Angleterre de soumettre l'Irlande à une agression continue.

     Avec tout le respect dû à M. Roosevelt et à sa compréhension des besoins et des soucis des autres pays, on peut néanmoins supposer que le Premier ministre irlandais connaît mieux que le président des États-Unis quels sont les dangers qui menacent son propre pays.

     De même, le fait a évidemment échappé à l'attention de M. Roosevelt que la Palestine est actuellement occupée non par les troupes allemandes, mais par les Anglais, et que le pays voit sa liberté restreinte par le recours à la force la plus brutale, est dépouillé de son indépendance et souffre des mauvais traitements les plus cruels au profit des intrus juifs. (...)

     Les Arabes vivant dans ce pays ne se seraient donc certainement pas plaints à M. Roosevelt de l'agression allemande, mais ils expriment devant le monde un appel constant, déplorant les méthodes barbares par lesquelles l'Angleterre tente de réprimer un peuple qui aime sa liberté et ne fait simplement que la défendre.

     Cela, aussi, est peut-être un problème qui, de l'avis du président américain, devrait être résolu à la table de conférence, c’est-à-dire, devant un juge juste, et non par la force physique ou des méthodes militaires, par des exécutions de masse, en brûlant des villages, en faisant sauter des maisons et ainsi de suite.

     Car un fait est sûrement certain. Dans ce cas-ci, l'Angleterre n'est en train de se défendre contre la menace d’une attaque arabe, mais comme un intrus qui n’a pas été invité, elle tente d'établir son pouvoir sur un territoire étranger qui ne lui appartient pas "

Version anglaise: "But I must also draw Mr. Roosevelt's attention to one or two mistakes in history. He mentions Ireland, for instance, and asks for a statement to the effect that Germany will not attack Ireland. Now, I have just read a speech delivered by Mr. de Valera, the Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister), in which strangely enough, and contrary to Mr. Roosevelt's opinion, he does not charge Germany with oppressing Ireland, but reproaches England with subjecting Ireland to continuous aggression.

With all due respect to Mr. Roosevelt's insight into the needs and cares of other countries, it may nevertheless be assumed that the Irish Taoiseach would be more familiar with the dangers which threaten his country than would the President of the United States.

Similarly the fact has obviously escaped Mr. Roosevelt's notice that Palestine is at present occupied not by German troops but by the English; and that the country is undergoing restriction of its liberty by the most brutal resort to force, is being robbed of its independence and is suffering the cruelest maltreatment for the benefit of Jewish interlopers. (...)

The Arabs living in that country would therefore certainly not have complained to Mr. Roosevelt of German aggression, but they are voicing a constant appeal to the world, deploring the barbarous methods with which England is attempting to suppress a people which loves its freedom and is merely defending it.

This, too, is perhaps a problem which in the American President's view should be solved at the conference table, that is, before a just judge, and not by physical force or military methods, by mass executions, burning down villages, blowing up houses and so on.

For one fact is surely certain. In this case England is not defending herself against a threatened Arab attack, but as an uninvited interloper, is endeavoring to establish her power in a foreign territory which does not belong to her"

À lire:

VIDEO - Deanna Spingola reads from the book: The Transfer Agreement Boycott Fever of 1933 by Professor Udo Walendy. This 40 page booklet goes into all of the pertinent background information regarding the declaration of war against Germany by self-described "World Jewry" or "Judea" , and their global boycott of German goods and services, based upon anti-German propaganda. Their stated objective was to bring Germany to destroy Germany. They began to implement this plan as soon as the National Socialists came to power in order to undermine Hitler, and thereby, subvert the will of the German people who had elected his party and it's economic rescue plan.
You can read the illustrated and sourced booklet for yourself here.

Voir aussi:

Jewish Emigration From the Third Reich, par Ingrid Weckert

German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler Reviewed by John M. Ries

Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP

Chamberlain 1939 : "C'est l'Amérique et le monde israélite international qui nous ont précipités dans la guerre."

More Than Meets the Eye?

• Why Bilderberg isn’t Nazi
Michael Collins Piper

Three current news stories—taken together—illustrate that things are not always as they seem. Take, for example, a new revelation about the Bilderberg group released by Internet voice Alex Jones in the wake of last week’s Bilderberg meeting in Virginia, where Jones joined a crowd jeering the assembled would-be world rulers.
Although Jones has insisted Bilderberg is some sort of remnant of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler devoted to a modern-day Nazi agenda, a report on Jones’s own website effectively admits Bilderberg’s program is distinctly anti-Nazi.
Citing the papers of former Sen. Fred Harris (D-Okla.), who attended Bilderberg’s 1966 meeting in Wiesbaden, Germany, Jones points out that Harris recorded the remarks of top Bilderberg figure, labor leader Walter Reuther, who outlined Bilderberg’s underlying agenda: “Nationalism is dangerous.”
WWII-era German National Socialism—Nazism —of course, was very much nationalist in every sense, and the fact nationalism was denounced at Bilderberg gives a clear picture of the real Bilderberg point of view, rumors notwithstanding.
Jones mentions Bilderberg’s founder, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, had been a Nazi Party member. But what Jones does not mention is that Bernhard left the party in 1934, a year after Hitler came to power, and by 1940 was a top leader of the anti-Nazi resistance in Europe. So by the time Bernhard became Bilderberg chief, he had undergone a serious political transformation.
What’s more, as careful historians know, Hitler held Bernhard in contempt. In his recorded Table Talk* and in the memoirs of his valet, Hitler is recalled scoffing satirically at Bernhard, and questioning his intelligence, integrity and loyalty.
The forces leading Bilderberg are anti-Nazi, particularly the Rothschild dynasty, whose assets were seized by the Nazis, belying a popular myth that “the Nazis never touched the Rothschilds.”

*Hitler’s Table Talk
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.

Excerpt from an article entitled

“New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in the New York Times (1940)

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a New World Order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.’”
1940 nwo for jews
Did Adolf Hitler serve the New World Order Agenda?  
The answer is clearly, NO HE DID NOT! However, what does serve the NWO agenda are the endless lies and the “bogeyman” image being promulgated and promoted by disinfo agents in the so-called “truth movement” who claim to be “fighting the New World Order agenda” !
Ask yourself, “who benefits” from the perpetuation of these lies?
In closing, I will add that, while military operations were (officially) halted in 1945 and victory declared by the ALL LIES, the war against Hitler, against Germany and against the Germans did NOT end, but continues unabated to this day. Germany is still, for all intents and purposes, an occupied and foreign controlled nation, and is still being held for ransom in an extortion racket which had it’s roots in 1933.   We are still waiting for “justice and peace” which obviously did NOT come out of World War II as advertised.
Only the truth will set us free!

PS I will be Deanna Spingola’s guest on Wednesday, April 10th, 2013. I hope you will tune in if you can, and we will welcome your calls in the 2nd hour too.
Republic Broadcasting (RBN) at 9 am Pacifc / 11 Central / Noon Eastern Listen live via the internet here:

The Jewish War of Survival - PDF

by Arnold Leese

(founder of the Imperial Fascist League)

CHAPTER I "We Are Fighting In Defense of Freedom" (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER II " We Are Meeting a Challenge to Our Own Security" (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER III "We are defending the rights of all Nations to live their own lives" and "fighting against the substitution of brute force for Law as the arbiter between Nations." (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER IV "We Are Fighting Against the Violation of the Sanctity of Treaties and Disregard of the Pledged Word" (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER V "We Are Fighting Today for the Preservation of Christian Principles" (The (London) Times, 17th Feb. 1940)
CHAPTER VI "We Are Fighting As Our Fathers Fought to Uphold the Doctrine That All Men Are Equal In the Sight of God" (Franklin D. Roosevelt, 6th Jan. 1942)
CHAPTER VII "We Are Fighting for Democracy"
CHAPTER VIII The Theory That High Finance Caused the War
CHAPTER IX The Object Is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism
CHAPTER X Unprepared and Blindfolded
CHAPTER XI Hitler Always Knew His Real Enemy
CHAPTER XII Hitler Wanted Peace With Britain
CHAPTER XIII How Britain Was Egged On to Make War
CHAPTER XIV The Jews Acknowledge Their Power and Threaten
CHAPTER XV The Jews Declare War
CHAPTER XVI The Jewish War
CHAPTER XVII The Peace: Britain Defeated Whoever Wins

Chapter VIII


There is a school of thought which believes that International Finance with its preponderant Jewish interest and the Monetary System under which most of the world has suffered from mass unemployment was doomed to be superseded by Hitler's credit system based upon a goods standard and international barter. This would displace gold, the tool of the Internationalists. I believe this myself.

But some go so far as to say that the war was brought about so that, if Hitler could be defeated, the Gold Standard Monetary System, which is fraudulent, could be maintained to the benefit of Wall Street and other large Gold Controllers.

I do not believe that.

It might be worth a war from the point of view of Wall Street, but it would not be worth this war. This war shows every trace of our having been dragged into it blindfolded and unprepared. Wall Street would not have allowed that. Wall Street knows that if the Germans won the war, there would be no more Wall Street.

In my opinion there was more to it than the survival of the fraudulent Gold Standard System. The necessities of racial survival made it urgent for the Jews to act without delay. Their considerable influence in Wall Street together with other participants in the spoils of the fraudulent system made it not too difficult to get the "Street" to support a war which was represented as inevitable.

This is not the place to go into the intricacies of monetary systems. The kernel of the problem is that credit based upon gold is insufficient for the needs of modern commerce. A short supply of money and credit is best for the usurer or money-lender, since scarcity raises the rate of interest borrowers must pay. Power to regulate the amount of money and credit available enables the controllers of Gold to dominate world affairs, economically and politically. The creation of inextinguishable national debts is part of the system of control and with control goes domination. This system of economic and financial bondage was doomed by the expansion of the barter system developed by National Socialist Germany. (For a more detailed explanation see the chapter, The Peace We Lost in A PEOPLE'S RUNNYMEDE, by Robert Scrutton, Andrew Dakers, publisher.)

Chapter IX

The Object is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism

At last we approach facts.

Certainly we went to war with the object of destroying Fascism and Hitlerism. But the people were not allowed to know this till it was too late to withdraw, or they would not have sanctioned it, had they had an opportunity to do so. It was not Hitler or a Fascist form of Government that was objected to but that both opposed the Jewish influence in their domestic affairs.

President Roosevelt, in a letter to the International Labour Office Conference in 1944, said:

"The welfare of the world's population and their liberty are the first and ultimate concern of those dedicated to root out from this earth every trace of Nazi ideas and Nazi methods."

The London Times' leading article of 26th September 1939, said:

"We have gone to war with the single-minded determination to rid Europe of a particular menace whose presence is incompatible with the continuance of civilized life, and it is the simplicity of this claim that resolves what the Duce feels to be inconsistency in our discrimination between Hitler and his Russian accomplice. We believe that the Russian action, lawless and treacherous as we must declare it to be, is a secondary and subordinate consequence of the original crime. The Soviet has not been a party to Hitler's previous outrages and has not shown itself to be in essence an aggressive power."

The Duce was not the only man to see inconsistency in the discrimination in favour of the Soviets, despite this dead-lame explanation.

On plenty of other occasions, politicians have assured us that we are fighting to destroy Fascism. But they do not tell us why they deem it so necessary. There was a time when it did not appear to be a necessity to Winston Churchill. In his Great Contemporaries he wrote:

"Those who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social terms have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile."

Again in STEP BY STEP, Churchill wrote of Herr Hitler:

"If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations."

But of Russia, Churchill said in 1920:

"The Soviet system is barbarism worse than the Stone Age."

In a broadcast on 20th January 1940 he said:

"Everyone can see how Communism rots the soul of a nation . . ."

And later in the year on 1st April, he said:

"Communism is a deadly mental and moral disease."

From this it is not understandable why Churchill should be leading the British Empire in a war to destroy National Socialism with the aid of Bolshevik Russia.

Of Italian Fascism, Churchill said in a speech on 11th November 1938:

"Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces and rallying the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilized society. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism."

As far back as 1926 the Financial News reported that a Committee of British Residents in Florence announced:

"We wish to state most clearly and emphatically that there exists here today nothing that can be justly termed either tyranny or suppression of personal freedom as guaranteed by constitutional law in any civilized land. We believe that Mussolini enjoys the enthusiastic support and admiration of the Italian people who are contented, orderly and prosperous to a degree hitherto unknown in Italy, and probably without parallel at the present time among other great European nations still suffering from the war."

Sympathetic readers will smile when they are reminded that in 1933 the Financial Times brought out a special eight-page Supplement under the caption:

The Renaissance of Italy Fascism's Gift of Order and Progress

The solution of the mystery is that in those days Fascism had not yet grappled with Jewish influences dominating the nation's affairs. Giuseppe Toeplitz, Polish born Jew, had just retired from the management of the Banca Commerciale Italiana, which a New York Times dispatch from Milan on January 29, 1938 (the date of Signor Toeplitz's death) estimated controlled one-seventh of all Italian industries.

We Fascists have noticed with amusement how our own Government is forced by the pressure of necessity to adopt many of the policies of Fascism. We may instance the recognition of Agriculture as basic among the industries; the necessity of ensuring that the Land is not misused by those farming it and the corporative organization of certain industries and professions.

The International Labour Office issued a report in April 1944 in which the activities of the German Labour Front established by Hitler were recommended to be "adapted for future use" after our victory. Facilities for workmen's travel, recreation and other sparetime activities, for vocational training and research on labour protection; the "Beauty of Work" service — "Kraft durch Freude" (Strength through Joy) in the National Socialist Labor Program — and the Labour Bank, "one of the chief credit institutions . . . of the whole of Europe"; "it should also be the responsibility of the Labour Commissioners," the Report of I.L.O. further outlines, "to continue all administrative services required for the administration of labor and social legislation — employment services, social insurance and the labour inspectorate." The I. L. O. Philadelphia Labor Charter actually purloins direct from Fascism its notions of industrial organizations! "It insists," says the London Times of 13th May 1944, "on the employers' right to combine freely, and declares also that if workers and employers combine to run industry collectively, there must be a third element — the Government — to cooperate and see that the rest of the community is not exploited." Similar proposals are found in the 1944 Report on Reconstruction issued by the Grand Council of the Trade Union Congress.

It was on these principles that the Fascist Corporative Organization of Industry was based! Then why should we be so keen to destroy all this? There can be but one plausible answer. National Socialism and Fascism opposed the Jewish influence in the domestic affairs of their respective countries. That we have ample proof that National Socialism and Fascism were good governments for the Germans and the Italians of their respective countries, apparently, is of no consideration. Is it that only Jewish interests matter the world over?

We may venture to doubt whether better Government for "liberated" Italy than the Fascist one can be achieved with the material at hand. Just consider this London Times report of the 25th April 1944:

"As most members of the new Cabinet are Republicans, a form of procedure was devised whereby Ministers, before taking oath, signed a declaration stating that they had accepted office with the purpose of serving the best interests of the country, but without attaching any permanent significance to the ceremony."

It was from such "accommodating scoundrels" as this that Fascism saved Italy for twenty years. At the time of this writing, every so-called "liberated" country begins a campaign of violence and outrage against its most active anti-communist elements. The same conditions are at once reproduced from which their Fascist or semi-Fascist Governments of the past had saved them.

John Loftus est un de ces auteurs, tels que Mae Brussell et Dave Emory, qui propagent le bobard du complot nazi à l'origine de la subversion de l'Amérique par le nouvel ordre mondial. Or même John Loftus admet que les transfuges nazis qui ont travaillé autour du nazi Gehlen pour l'OSS avaient des liens étroits avec des agents israéliens (Gehlen travaillait pratiquement pour les services du Mossad!). John Loftus est un ancien des services secrets impliqué dans la traque aux criminels nazis et qui a également présidé le musée de l'Holocauste de Floride. Est-il besoin de préciser qu'il est pro-Israël? Il prétend débusquer le complot ultime trouvant sa source dans le transfert des nazis réaffectés à divers projets du gouvernement américain.

Wikipedia John Loftus:
“John Joseph Loftus (February 12, 1950) is an American author, former U.S. government prosecutor and former Army intelligence officer. He is a president of The Intelligence Summit and, although he is not Jewish, a president of the Florida Holocaust Museum. Loftus also serves on the Board of Advisers to Public Information Research.(...)
He began working for the U.S. Department of Justice in 1977 and in 1979 joined their Office of Special Investigations, which was charged with prosecuting and deporting Nazi war criminals in the US. Loftus’ now-expired Web site claimed, “As a young U.S. Army officer, John Loftus helped train Israelis on a covert operation that turned the tide of battle in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.”(...)
He also writes regularly for Ami, an Orthodox Jewish weekly news magazine.
On August 7, 2005, he provided the United States address of an alleged terrorist named Iyad K. Hilal on Fox News. Only afterwards was it revealed that Hilal had left the address three years previously and the home was now owned by a family, which was then subjected to threats and vandalism and required police protection as a result of Loftus’ words. Fox terminated Loftus’s contract to commentate after the event. Loftus said “I thought it might help police in that area now that we have positively identified a terrorist,” but he did not say why he did not contact police in a more direct manner. Loftus apologized for the mistake and expressed frustration about “one federal [agency’s]” inaction on an earlier tip he had given them years ago due to the same address." []
Piper rapporte au sujet de Loftus dans son livre Final Judgment, sur l'assassinat de JFK:
John Loftus - Author of The Secret War Against the Jews, a new book which claims that anti-Israel partisans in the American intelligence community have sought to sabotage the state of Israel. (Loftus is a former attorney with the Nazi-hunting Office of Special Investigations.)

À propos de certaines sources douteuses telles que le juif et ancien agent du renseignement britannique John Coleman...
YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH 101 Books Nationalists Need to Read and Understand Before 'They' Burn Them, by Michael Collins Piper (2013) p.33-36