VIDEO - Alex Jones: Cointelpro
Désinformation, diversion, ingénierie sociale... voilà ce qui tuera le mouvement de vérité!
Après l'attentat de Boston, les médias contrôlés font leur travail de dissimulation, les conspirationnistes contrôlés aussi: Alex Jones
s'est empressé de sortir sa théorie de la piste saoudienne! Bref, pour ceux qui n'ont pas compris, Alex Jones dit que
"c'était les musulmans"! (Une variante à peine différente de la
version officielle qui conclut à tout coup que "c'était les musulmans!") Et Obama serait coupable d'avoir essayé de cacher ça! (C'est les néocons qui vont être contents: eux aussi ils veulent la peau du "musulman" Obama.) Les sources d'infowars sont deux propagandistes sionistes anti-Islam: Steve EMERSON et Michael SAVAGE.
INFOWARS: Obama Covering Up Saudi Link to Boston Bombing?
According to terrorism expert Steve Emerson, 20-year-old Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, the Saudi national first suspected of being involved in Monday’s twin bomb attack, is being hastily deported. Alharbi was put under armed guard in hospital after the bombing, was visited by Saudi diplomat Azzam bin Abdel Karim, and later had his apartment raided by federal and state law enforcement agents.“I just learned from my own sources that he is now going to be deported on national security grounds next Tuesday, which is very unusual,” Emerson told Fox News last night.(...)“That’s very interesting because this is the way things are done with Saudi Arabia. You don’t arrest their citizens. You deport them, because they don’t want them to be embarrassed and that’s the way we appease them,” Emerson told host Sean Hannity.(...)Radio host Michael Savage floated the theory yesterday that the Boston police were told to cancel the press conference by the Obama administration and the FBI, because the Saudi Foreign Minister demanded that the suspect be allowed to leave the country.
Fox fait la même chose
qu'Infowars: ils ont donné une tribune à Emerson, ce soi-disant "expert
du terrorisme" qui traque des ennemis imaginaires qui ont le dos de plus en plus large...
Fox Amplifies Discredited Anti-Islamic Activist Steve Emerson During Boston Coverage
La nouvelle du Saoudien
déporté s'est avérée fausse, ce qui ne l'a pas empêché d'être reprise par Emerson
et Savage ainsi que par d'autres propagandistes sionistes en croisade anti-Islam
tels que Robert SPENCER et Pamela GELLER (tous deux juifs) et Glenn Beck. Il ne manquait plus que Daniel Pipes (Mise à jour 27 avril: Education by Murder in Boston, par Daniel Pipes).
Ce qui est sûr, donc, c'est que le Mossad travaille activement à la
propagande en vue de manipuler l'opinion publique à travers les médias contrôlés (qui, tout compte fait, existent seulement pour
servir de tribune à ces menteurs professionnels) pour justifier d'envoyer nos jeunes à la guerre pour servir de chair au profit des intérêts sionistes.
Steve Emerson: Saudi national questioned in Boston Marathon bombings to be deported on national security grounds next week
VIDEO - Steve Emerson - Saudi Man Cleared in Boston Bombing Now Being Deported?
Pamela Geller: Saudi National Deportation: American People Must Demand the Full Story
Pamela Geller: JIHADI ARRESTED IN HORRIFIC BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING
VIDEO - Robert Spencer - Boston bomb: "Wake up America Australia England"
Robert Spencer - Jihad in Boston?
Audio: Jihadwatch.org - Robert Spencer discusses the Boston jihad bombings on the Laura Ingraham Show
Steve Emerson Bungles It Again: Saudi National Not Being Deported
Steve Emerson Gets It Wrong–Again
Right won’t let go of Saudi conspiracy theory
Why is Steve Emerson still a “terrorism expert”?
After Boston explosions, a scapegoat emerges on the right
Following the New York Post's lead, a belief is affirmed: The Boston explosions must have been done by Muslims
Pamela Geller embraces Beck's conspiracy theory, fares even worse selling it
Glenn Beck conspiracy theory: What's his evidence?
VIDEO - Glenn Beck the "Boston Truther"
The right’s new Boston conspiracy theory
Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer Instantly Blame Muslims for Boston Attack, Followers Spew Vile Racism
VIDEO - Démontage de la théorie du complot des "acteurs" de l'attentat de Boston
English: Why there were no 'actors' at the Boston Marathon bombings
Lire plus..
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2013/04/21/a-commentary-on-the-marathon-murders
A Commentary on the Marathon Murders
by Richard Falk
April 21, 2013
Blowback Will Continue
to Haunt the United States
• Jewish professor vilified for saying U.S. policy provokes terrorism
By Michael Collins Piper
for American Free Press
One of America’s most outspoken academics is under fire again, once more accused of “anti-Semitism”—even though he’s Jewish—and charged with being “anti-American.” Dr. Richard Falk’s latest crime is having suggested the Boston Marathon incident was a result of the misconduct of U.S. foreign policy.
The late Chalmers Johnson, another harsh critic of American global adventurism—often referred to as the New World Order—famously described such unpleasant consequences as “blowback.” Falk sees a great deal of blowback ahead unless drastic changes are soonmade in the direction of U.S. policy.
Earlier, Falk upset many by writing the foreword to the hotly controversial book by Dr. David Ray Griffin—The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9-11—which raised serious questions about the U.S. government’s version of 9-11.
Addressing the government contention that the Boston bombing was the work of two young Muslims dissatisfied with American policy, Falk took a broad-ranging view of U.S. global relations and predicted a bleak future if things continue on the course they have during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
One Jewish academician is under fire for suggesting that America’s foreign policy results in more terrorism.
Writing in Foreign Policy Journal on April 21, Falk slammed what he called “the American global domination project”—and concluded it is “bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.” In fact, he said, “in some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if there is no disposition to rethink U.S. relations to others in the world, starting with the Middle East.”
Falk summarized the consequences of what he referred to as “the failed wars” in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not only did those wars devastate those countries, while adding nothing to American security, but, he pointed out, “these unlawful wars wasted trillions expended over the several years during which many Americans were enduring the hardships and pain of the deepest economic recession since the 1930s.”
Republicans—typically—are up in arms over Falk’s assessment, demanding Falk be ousted from his UN post, but the no-nonsense professor has not spared Obama from criticism either.
Referring to what he calls Obama’s “obsequious diplomacy” and “backpedaling” in dealing with Israel, Falk said that although some at first saw signs Obama might be moving to put a brake on Israel, “it seems that Obama has given up altogether, succumbing to the Beltway ethos of ‘Israel first’.”
While Obama and the American foreign policy elite initially appeared to be moving away from “irresponsible and unlawful warfare” as “the centerpiece of America’s foreign policy”—the hallmark of the George W. Bush era—this is unfortunately, in Falk’s estimation, “far from a certainty.”
Right now, noted Falk, “the war drums are beating . . . in relation to both North Korea and Iran, and as long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy.”
Noting that “bipartisan support for maintaining the globe-girdling geopolitics runs deep in the body politic, and is accompanied by the refusal to admit the evidence of national decline,” Falk contended that “the signature irony is that the more America’s decline is met by a politics of denial, the more rapid and steep will be the decline, and the more abrupt and risky will be the necessary shrinking of the global leadership role so long played by the United States.”
Despite media and government elites continuing to defend American globalism, Falk sees some signs that grassroots Americans are waking up to the dangers and are beginning a “long-overdue” reflection on America’s role in the world.
——
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
Richard Falk: ‘Israel behind Boston bombing’
UN's Falk ties Boston bombs to Obama's Israel trip
Attaque de Boston : Falk blâme Israël
AJC urges removal of UN's Richard Falk for controversial Boston comments
MCP discusses the jewish propaganda promoted by Alex Jones on the Boston bombing. Points to anti-Muslim propaganda as an attack on white people.
The Ugly Truth Broadcast April 23, 2013
Boston Marathon Bombing a ‘Bibi’ operation as a follow up to his threats made on the floor of the UN General Assembly in Sept.
We are joined by Dr. Hesham Tillawi of ‘Current Issues’.
Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
AFP RADIO - Date with a Debate: Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend
AFP Radio Network
Download Default player New Window Embed
Dave Gahary moderates a debate between Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend, who tackle the controversy surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event.
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at U of M Duluth, and an authority on the JFK assassination, 9/11, and Sen. Wellstone's death.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Jim is a contributor and editor at Veterans Today and hosts a radio show, "The Real Deal", M/W/F
John Friend is a writer who maintains a blog and hosts “The Realist Report.”
Operation Ouroboros: Boston suspect linked to newspaper that exposes false flag operations
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
In a front page story in today’s edition of the Wall Street Journal, the alleged Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev is linked to the populist, right wing newspaper, American Free Press, a national weekly which exposes government black ops.Strange that a terrorist would be subscribing to a newspaper that warns its readers that terrorism is too often a US government false flag operation against its own people. The report, in the August 6, 2013 Wall Street Journal, titled "Bombing Suspect Steeped in Conspiracies," brings us full circle, with the serpent consuming its own tail by pointing to its unmasking in the pages of the American Free Press -- daring us to act on the directional signal it is providing about itself -- and if we do not, then the serpent's coils are made exponentially tighter as it grips our hearts and minds.(...)
According to the FBI, Jewish extremists commit more terror than Islamic extremists!
VIDEO - DHS Whistleblower Censored from 60 minutes (on spying on "terrorists")
Abe Foxman Rationalizes Blanket Spying On American Muslims
Former Fox News pundit: ‘Fox waging a campaign’ to link ‘radical’ and ‘Islam’
Fox News host: Denouncing violence against Muslims ‘could be perceived’ as offensive
VIDEO - US-Zionist media brainwashing Americans against Islam
Dutch politician Geert Wilders: ‘What we need today is Zionism for the nations of Europe’
High-Level Intriguers Behind Recent Barrage of Anti-Muslim Propaganda
American Free Press
Internet Rife With Disinformation
• “ Cyber shills” working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers
BEHIND THE SCENES
Michael Collins Piper
Evidence suggests patriots and truthseekers are being subjected to insidious
means of mind control—and crowd control—through a covert campaign now
being orchestrated across the Internet.
This Nov. 20, 2011 file photo
shows TV and radio commentator Glenn Beck at the 114th Anniversary
Justice Louis Brandeis award Dinner given by the Zionist Organization of
America in New York.
Michael Collins Piper, False Flags--Template for Terror:
_This is guaranteed: You are about to be confronted with some harsh realities that may be unlike you’ve ever encountered in whatever you’ve heard about what happened at Sandy Hook school on Dec. 14 2012 and at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.
_If you will be personally offended by expressions of fact and opinion (based on fact) that may contradict your deepest-felt beliefs regarding Sandy Hook and Boston, then please read no further.
_We’ll say it right now—and this will certainly astound you: Forget everything—everything—you’ve heard in both the mainstream media and in the “alternative” media about Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Then, after you’ve studied—if you dare—the material we are about to explore, you’ll realize what really happened at Sandy Hook and Boston is something unlike anything—and so very much bigger— than even you might have imagined.
_You’ll never look at Sandy Hook and Boston in the same way again. But you will be prepared for whatever future “crisis” the high-level conspirators undoubtedly have planned for America.
_As such, when that crisis happens, you’ll be better able to see through the fog of disinformation that will be once again unleashed— and rest assured that it will be.
In the wake of Sandy Hook and Boston, much was heard in the “alternative”media about “Crisis Actors” who played a part in misdirecting people’s attention as to the real facts about what happened during those “false flag” events.
_And false flag events they were. Both of those tragedies were classic false flag operations, but the truth is that they were not precisely the kind of false flag of the type that we saw carried out in the JFK assassination, in the Oklahoma City bombing, and later in 9-11.
_In fact, as we’ll see here—and this is the first time ever the story has been told in its entirety—the real “Crisis Actors” were not those whom many people believed them to be.
_And that is a story in and of itself.
_And it will surprise you.
_The story is much bigger than anyone might have conceived and it points toward the venal nature of a carefully-crafted high-level conspiracy that bears all the ear-marks of the manipulative masters of mind control whose not-so-fine (and ugly) hand was so clearly on the levels of power in the murder of JFK and those mass murders that followed in Oklahoma City and with the 9-11 terrorist tragedy.
_The vast flow of dissident information that erupted following the events of 9-11 made it an absolute“must” for the Mossad and its allies in intrigue to prevent it from ever happening again.
_You see, this is old-fashioned “crisis management” at its best (or worst).But the“crisis” in question—as you might naturally think—is not the death of the president or the lives lost in Oklahoma City or on 9-11.
_Rather, the crisis—in the minds of the conspirators responsible—is the potential danger to their power that could erupt if enough people came, for example, to conclude that the Mossad was indeed responsible for any of these false flag terrorist attacks on American soil.
_Therefore—in the wake of 9-11 and the Internet frenzy that took place with the rise of fast-moving and widely-distributed conspiracy theories (many implicating the Mossad)—it is now clear a conscious decision was made to ensure that, in the future, when any event of a conspiratorial nature occurred (particularly one involving the Mossad) that those most inclined toward acceptance of conspiracy theories would be corralled and misdirected through the most effective means possible.
_However, to achieve this end, it would be necessary to determine the best way to chart the rise and course of conspiracy theories; to pinpoint precisely who is most susceptible toward believing in them and, naturally, to do all that could be done to discredit them.
_But the plan—as we shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it was a stroke of genius).
_The intriguers effectively determined that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes). That is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to the mix.
_The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility.
_In the past, people did have doubts about the official stories relating to the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 tragedy. Now, however, emerging alternative theories about other events would be totally eviscerated—from within—and die by their own accord.Anyone putting forth any form of conspiracy theory would automatically become suspect, their very sanity questioned.
_The multiple stream of Internet provocations that captured the imagination of the “patriot” and“alternative” media following the Sandy Hook affair and the events in Boston were—beyond any question—the work of high-level conspirators whose designs were clear:
_1) To monitor the reaction of known (and potential) political dissidents to public events of a “crisis” nature;
_2) To gauge the level of conspiracy theorizing (and the acceptance of the theories) following such events;
_3) To trace the origins of conspiracy theories and to chart their course via Internet websites, email and other social media venues;
_4) To disrupt and misdirect conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theories whose views were deemed in some way problematic;
_and 5) To have in place a fully-functioning Crisis Management System—a very real “conspiracy”—that could be utilized to its fullest capacity at some future time.
_The first public hint of what was openly-acknowledged high-level intrigue of this sort—designed to undermine the 9-11 truth movement (not to mention any and all suggestions of conspiracies in other realms) was formally unveiled on January 15, 2008.
_At that time, one Cass Sunstein, a professor at the University of Chicago, and his co-author, Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule, put forth a so-called “preliminary draft” of what was officially issued as “Harvard Public LawWorking Paper No.08-03 and University of Chicago Public LawWorking Paper No. 199.”
_Although little-noticed at the time it was first issued, the “working paper” came under broad-ranging public inspection (widely discussed on the Internet) after Sunstein was drafted in 2009 by President Barack Obama to serve as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a post Sunstein departed in 2012.
_Later published under other auspices under the title “Conspiracy Theories,” the paper addressed the specific question of how the government should respond to conspiracy theories that were now holding wide sway (particularly on the Internet) and, in no uncertain terms, addressed what Sunstein (who is Jewish) considered the specific danger of the growing belief that Israel had played a part in 9-11.
_Naturally, 9-11 truthers were outraged by this paper and noted (rightly so) that the co-author was now effectively “minister of information” for the Obama regime: A U.S. government official was actually pondering, in writing,how government power could be used to deal with conspiracy theories and those who believed in them!
_Sunstein’s insidious and Orwellian “think piece” began by raising this question:
_However, Sunstein said,many officials considered it “an exercise in futility” to try to respond directly to “the suppliers of conspiracy theories” and that, instead, they tried to “address their responses to the third-party mass audience, hoping to stem the spread of conspiracy theories by dampening the demand rather than by reducing the supply.”
_In answer to his own question“What can the government do about conspiracy theories?” Sunstein provided five possibilities:
_However, Sunstein concluded, the government could engage in efforts to counter the theories by recruiting“credible private parties” to combat conspiracy theoriests and by engaging in “information communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.”
_And this framework, in itself, is already in place. It is a very dirty and ugly history indeed, demonstrated by the long-standing collaboration between such groups as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center (not to mention the American Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Committee) working with the CIA and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, as well as Israel’s Mossad—and, dare we add, British intelligence—in concerted efforts to undermine American political dissidents.
_Working from this standpoint Sunstein outlined what he called “a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories.” This program, he said, involved the following:
_And with the increasingly widespread knowledge we now have about the capacity of the National Security Agency—among many government intelligence agencies in the United States alone—to monitor the telephone calls, emails, and other Internet activity of all Americans,we can certainly say, with utmost authority, that Sunstein and his co-conspirators and like-minded intriguers had already concluded that the framework was in place to be able to see precisely who was engaged in conspiracy talk and with whom they were communicating.
_It is thus no coincidence that when the series of scandals erupted over the summer of 2013 regarding the activities of the National Security Agency (NSA) that Cass Sunstein was one of the four members of the so-called “independent” panel appointed by President Barack Obama charged with the responsibility of “reviewing” the operations of the NSA and other government agencies.
_And nor,we might add, it is any coincidence that another member of the panel, Richard Clarke (a former high ranking advisor to presidents—Democratic and Republican alike—in the realm of“national security”) now happens to head a private firm known as Good Harbor Security Risk Management.
_And yes, as you might have guessed, Good Harbor touts “Crisis Management” as one of its specialities.
_Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.
_The concept of “Crisis Management” is the new “big thing” in our modern era.And don’t forget—as we mentioned in Chapter Eighteen— that former high-ranking FBI official Neil Herman who was involved in much of the intrigues surrounding 9-11 (and who later worked as director of “fact-finding” for Israel’s American intelligence arm, the Anti- Defamation League) went on to become part of the “crisis management team” at Burson-Marstellar, one of the premier firms in that field today.
_In fact, two popular television dramas of recent date have Crisis Management specialists at the core of their storyline—“Scandal,” portraying the day-to-day workings of a beautiful African-American Crisis Management operative in Washington, D.C. and “The Good Wife,” featuring a particularly wily Crisis Management specialist (portrayed as a distinctly Jewish figure with the name of“Eli Gold”) who carries on his intrigues in Cass Sunstein’s home base of Chicago, no less.
_Both programs are quite revealing and say much about the nature of Crisis Management methods of operation.
_Several episodes of “The Good Wife” noted the use of “cyber shills” whose duty it is to infiltrate the Internet and place false stories and provocations designed to promote some particular agenda—or disrupt someone else’s.
_A simple Internet search of the term “Crisis Management”—and the term does deserve to be capitalized as we have rendered it here— demonstrates how foremost these new techniques of “public relations” (that is, propaganda) really are in the minds of those in high places.
_As we said: “Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.”
_So it was that—with the nature of Internet communication as it exists today and with the capacity to be able to monitor any and all content circulating on the Internet—Cass Sunstein and company had the means to construct and carry out a rather simple (but 21st Century-style technologically-sophisticated) exercise in Crisis Management planning which incorporated rather skillful experimentation with that new technology in implementing good old-fashioned Crowd Control.
And when we talk about Crowd Control,we’re not talking about the use of fire hoses and police dogs and stun guns. Rather, in fact, what we’re talking about is really just a highly-advanced form of “Mind Control”—one designed to influence a large number of people over an extended period of time through covert and quite insidious manipulation of the media—and that does include the Internet and the “alternative” and “independent” media as well. Unfortunately, a brief digression into the topic of Mind Control is relevant and important here, for it relates directly to the nature of the manipulative experiments in False Flag Crowd Control that were central to the Internet frenzy following both Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Long part of the intrigues of the high-level conspirators—best exemplified in the CIA’s infamous MK-ULTRA experiments in Mind Control, the initial stages of which were launched in the days following the CIA’s founding in 1947—this realm has not only been a province of the CIA, but also that of the Soviet KGB and Israel’s Mossad and other intelligence agencies (both public and private)—as well.
_Now, unfortunately, although the concept of Mind Control is best known among truth-seekers as a consequence of the widespread distribution of such works as Cathy O’Brien’s rather dubious book Trance-Formation of America, the truth is that there has always been available a wide variety of responsible material on the subject, in particular the book by former State Department foreign service officer John D. Marks entitled The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.
_Subtitled “The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to Control Human Behavior,” Marks’ book was based on some 16,000 pages of documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act following the public revelations regarding CIA adventures in this bizarre field that were unveiled in the wake of a controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA. Until then, Americans believed that only “the Communists” and “the Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant experiments to manipulate human behavior.
_(The title of Marks’non-fiction book was inspired by the 1958 novel by Richard Condon—later a popular motion picture—entitled The Manchurian Candidate. In that horrifying story, an American soldier is brainwashed by the communists during the KoreanWar, falsely set up as a “war hero” to be revered by the American public, and later manipulated in an assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
_(It turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known “anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting communism.
_The mind-control victim never knows he is being manipulated— until it is too late.) So—all of that having been said—Mind Control is very real and can be carried out in a variety of ways.And Crowd Control—which is a part of Crisis Management—is a form of Mind Control. And you may rest assured that those who have in interest in these matters have studied these concepts carefully and know precisely how they work.
_And—as we have seen—with high-level forces having witnessed the growth of “conspiracy theories”which these would be masters of the universe realize endanger their power—particularly with the rise of the Internet as a somewhat “independent”means of communication— the need to combat those conspiracy theories (and to control the Internet) has become a major concern.
_These very real conspirators—people of the likes of the aforementioned Cass Sunstein,who actually laid out a plan for undermining conspiracy theories—determined the best way to facilitate their operation was to orchestrate (or take advantage of) an event that would grip the public imagination and then manipulate it for their own purposes.
_Their goal was to have in place a carefully-structured network that, in the future,could be used in a much-bigger fashion to direct or—as the case may be—to misdirect public opinion (particularly in the realm of those open to “conspiracy theories”) and ensure that the trade of information regarding such events was carefully controlled.
_Here, essentially,was the plan: These conspirators needed a “crisis”—a reasonably small and manageable event they could monitor and manipulate from the very beginning, finding out, essentially,“who’s in touch with whom” and by what means and venues conspiracy theories (relating to such a crisis) gained their most widespread circulation.
_Whether the crisis was “real”—that is, of its own making, one that happened on its own—or whether it was manufactured (through covert means by some clandestine agency) didn’t matter.
_What mattered was the capacity to track (and, more importantly, to direct) public reaction to the crisis (particularly in the realm of “conspiracy theories”) and to manage the crisis to such a degree that any and all conspiracy theories relating to that crisis could be made to look foolish.
_And here’s the critical point to remember: These conspirators also realized that they could effectively redirect public debate not just by countering conspiracy theories but by actively inserting their own downright silly and ridiculous disinformation into the debate with the aim of discrediting any and all conspiracy theories.
_Worthy of the greatest thinkers of theTalmud, it was right out of the legendary Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And it was programmed—from the start—to capture the imagination of (and control) the minds of sincere patriots who were already inclined (quite naturally) to buy into conspiracy theories!
_Fully versed in the legendary sociological study of crowd behavior laid down in 1895 by Gustave Lebon in The Crowd—a volume described as having “exerted a powerful influence upon the thought of men aiming to understand the workings of collective behavior and of social psychology”—Sunstein and company set in motion a scheme that can only be described as brilliant, if not just simply as evil.
_To those who understand Sunstein’s proposition on the deeper level of Mind Control that it represents and who have likewise taken the time to carefully study the bigger picture in retrospect, it is all too apparent that the Internet-based frenzy following the Sandy Hook affair was clearly the work of the Sunstein crowd—we’ll call them the Crisis Management Conspirators—who remembered all too well what Gustave LeBon had said when he wrote so succinctly:“To know the art of impressing the imagination of crowds is to know at the same time the art of governing them.”
_The Sandy Hook affair was tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control, inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no less.
_The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
_And, quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
_And naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook.
_Now some of the errors were eventually corrected,but many of the errors were simply ignored or otherwise lost in the shuffle, and this led to further suspicions on the part of those who sensed that there was more to Sandy Hook than was officially being reported.
_(Unfortunately, although some of the errors were indeed later corrected,many so-called “conspiracy theorists” never became aware of those corrections and continued—even to this day—to cite those
“errors” as evidence of a cover-up.
_(And that’s another reason conspiracy theorists must be detail-oriented, for if they can be disproven in one minor area, those who are eager to dismiss their theories will use that one mistake as “evidence” that the bigger picture—the more broad-ranging so-called “conspiracy theory”—is, in and of itself, totally wrong.)
_But note this:
_Considering the fact Sunstein and his like-minded conspirators do have high-level connections to the controllers of the big media, it’s likely some media elements deliberately purveyed incomplete or imprecise stories about Sandy Hook, knowing full well that alert readers and audiences would detect these errors and that they would be bandied about as “proof” of a conspiracy, further muddying the waters.And that, in fact, is what happened in many instances.
_However, as we shall see, there is strong evidence to suggest that at least some “inside” elements in the mass media did play a key role in “leaking” material that was used by the Sunstein group to distract truth seekers in the wake of Sandy Hook. More about that later.
_But aside from the mis-reporting in the major media (whether deliberate or otherwise) it was almost exclusively on the Internet—via the so-called “truther” and “alternative” and “independent” websites, discussion groups, along with email and the popular video forum, YouTube, etc—that a wide variety of absolutely baseless (and largely nonsensical) stories about Sandy Hook began to appear.
_This was clearly the work of a small but skilled team of operatives working for Sunstein and company.
_As Sunstein had suggested in his now-infamous working paper, their purpose was to manipulate—and ultimately refute—and make fools of—sincere truth seekers and so-called “conspiracy theorists.”
_And, even more so, Sunstein’s goal was to convince the broad range of the American public that anyone who spoke about any conspiracies at high levels was just simply not someone to be believed.
_One of the first and most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oftrepeated theme that“Sandy Hook was a hoax”and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that was a frequently repeated allegation.)
_Even the introduction of the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited.
_And—just as Sunstein and company expected (and desired)—other individuals discussing other matters involving conspiracies (the 9-11 cover-up, the Oklahoma bombing, the JFK assassination, and even the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty) were themselves being subjected to sarcastic comments such as,“I suppose you’re also one of those people who doesn’t believe those 20 little children were killed at Sandy Hook.”
_Sunstein and company had scored big.
_They knew they literally had a proverbial “captive audience” that was unwittingly receptive to their manipulations. And they had the capacity to track—via the Internet—the entirety of the exchange of information going on.
_This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams.
_Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators implementing his plan recognized that the diverse assortment of groups active in political dissent —whether they call themselves “patriots” or “nationalists” or “truth seekers” or “white separatists” (the list of such largely selfimposed labels could go on and on)—constituted the definition of a “crowd” as laid forth in the aforementioned Gustave LeBon’s rather sinister analysis of the manner in which a “crowd” can be manipulated.
_As such, the Le Bonian Mind Control masterminds recognized that precisely because a “crowd” tends, thus, to think alike, and accept all precepts that “sound good” or which seem parallel to their particular mindset, that a “crowd” would immediately incorporate by “process of contagion” any idea inserted into the mass thinking of the crowd.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators knew that once a “crowd” had become conditioned to “think alike” (so to speak) and was thereby easily subject to the power of suggestion, that such a like-minded group would immediately start to develop its own particular mindset a way of looking at some issue or event.
_As Le Bon pointed out:
_In fact, this was the REAL “false flag” in the whole Sandy Hook debate, but many good patriots didn’t see what was happening.
_Rather than focusing on the genuine issue of specific concern—the push for gun control—“The Crowd” was instead gettting bogged down and looking in the wrong direction, worrying about a variety of unimportant details and making allegations about Sandy Hook—that no children had actually died, for example—that made honest critics of gun control look foolish, if not downright venal.
_Most people among the general public more or less accepted the idea that a disturbed young man had committed a horrible deed and that—predictably—gun control advocates once again jumped on the tragedy in order to pursue their anti-gun agenda.
_A lot of people—including a lot of people in the “truth movement”—had previously (and rightly) expressed concerns that many of the people involved in previous mass shootings had been under the influence of psychiatric drugs which have been pushed by the major media to the great profit of the pharmeceutical conglomerates.
_And at the outset, even most skeptics of the official version of events had no doubt buying the possibility that the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza,had been the victim of MK-ULTRA style mind control,brainwashed into committing a mass shooting in order to help stampede public support for gun control or outright gun confiscation.
_Over the years more than a few independent journalists had compiled an assembly of data on a number of mass shootings in the U.S. and elsewhere suggesting there was much more to the story behind these shootings; that, in fact, they were orchestrated by behind-the-scenes forces and that there was evidence of “mind control” involved.
_So there were a lot of good reasons for many to at least suspect that perhaps there was some sort of Mind Control or other form of high-level intrigue involved in the Sandy Hook shooting.
_In fact—up until Sandy Hook—this explanation (that Lanza was a mind-controlled false flag patsy who actually killed little chiildren) would have sufficed for even the most hard-core skeptic who doubted the official version of events laid down by the authorities.
_But with Sandy Hook—and the intervention of the Crisis Management Conspirators—the outlook of the“average”grass-roots conspiracy theorist in “The Crowd” would never be the same again.
_As a consequence of the intrigues of the Crisis Management Conspirators, the mindset of the conspiracy theorists would be drastically altered to the point that many good people were pushed into the direction of believing that absolutely nothing—absolutely nothing— could ever be believed and that everything—absolutely everything— was a horrendous lie.
_And we are not talking just about Sandy Hook.We are talking about virtually anything—everything—taking place in our world today.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators were pushing honest truth seekers in“The Crowd” into a proverbial padded cell where they could just keep screaming at the top of their voices and banging their heads against the wall with the ultimate realization that nobody was paying any attention to them whatsoever—a virtual Twilight Zone.
_Nonetheless—on a parallel basis—the Crisis Management Conspirators,quite naturally,didn’t want anyone in the general public, at least, to ever consider the possibility that there had been any Mind Manipulation or any conspiracy to stage a“crisis”—such as another mass shooting—to justify gun confiscation.
_Therefore, they began spinning bizarre tales and inserting them onto the Internet and into the mind of “The Crowd”—that is, patriots and other skeptics of the official story—in order to muddy up serious inquiry and discussion.
_They dazzled “The Crowd”with an array of colorful and interesting and fiendishly clever (if not obviously outrageous) rumors that absolutely had the immediate and profound (and very much intended) effect of directing public ire upon those good patriots—the so-called “conspiracy theorists”—who were rightly concerned about behind-thescenes manipulation that accompanied the events at Sandy Hook.
_Soon enough—and not surprisingly—people in the general public began to think any conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook were absolutely beyond the pale and that people inclined toward conspiracy theories questioning the official government line were crazy troublemakers who belonged in mental hospitals!
_The Crisis Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute the latest Sandy Hook “revelations.”
_And, of course, this—as we shall see in a moment—was all keeping in line with another aspect of the “crowd” that the “guru” of the Crisis Management Conspirators—Gustave LeBon—had already assessed.
People were falling victim to the the fact that because something is repeated time and again, it gains a certain credibility in the mind of the ‘crowd.” LeBon wrote:
_The truth is that a vast majority of the Sandy Hook spin came from theretofore unknown sources—who to this day still remain largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames—who helped put out much of the material in the first place, adding often-dubious commentary that helped stir up suspicion in the first place.
_As LeBon had so rightly said, “at the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.” How true it was with Sandy Hook!
_These Internet sources who had suddenly popped up had no reputation (either good or bad) among traditional patriots and conspiracy theorists—but their impact was immeasurable.
_And they were ably aided and abetted by some longtime deep-cover assets—agents provocateurs—inside the patriot movement who helped give further “credibility” to these stories being cranked out by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_A lot of old CIA hands and federal informants---veterans of the black propaganda journal Media Bypass (referenced in Chapter Fourteen) that had been heavily funded and set up in time for the disinformation surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing----popped up to help disseminate a lot of the Sandy Hook-related nonsense that gripped the imagination of the patriots.
_Meanwhile, on a daily basis, the powers-that-be in control of the mass media were cranking up a continuing round-the-clock campaign in favor of gun control,pointing at Sandy Hook as underscoring the necessity for dismantling the Second Amendment. It was, they said, “for the children.” Americans were told they needed to give up their guns so as to prevent future tragedies of this kind.
_But the irony is that many good people who thought that by“exposing the Sandy Hook fraud”—that is, passing on the Internet-based rumors about Sandy Hook—that they were “doing something” to stop the drive for gun control. In fact, it was a total misdirection from the central issue of gun control. Peoples’energies were being focused not on gun control but on the “necessity” to “spread the truth about Sandy Hook.”
_And that, as we’ve said,was the real“false flag” in Sandy Hook. However,unfortunately, the patriots who were repeating the Internet rumors were giving a whole new twist to the controversy surrounding Sandy Hook and the push for gun control that came in its wake.
_What was happening was that the more the conspiracy theories surrounding Sandy Hook got all the more fantastic, the more it had the effect of discrediting all sincere critics of gun control who were being identified with “those people who say that no children really died at Sandy Hook.” The bottom line matter of fighting the drive for gun control was sidelined by “The Crowd” which had become caught up in discussing (and perpetuating) all of the silly Sandy Hook rumors that the Crisis Management Conspirators had unleashed on the Internet.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators—having a field day (and a good laugh) at their success in re-shaping the thinking of conspiracyconscious patriots—knew full well of another key concept put forth by LeBon: The fact that a “crowd” can accept the most ridiculous propositions, ones that an individual—prior to becoming a member of the “crowd”—would not be so ready to incorporate into his thinking. if given the time to consider the matter more fully.
_More and more a fabulously colorful bazaar of bizarre conspiracy theories began to swirl around Sandy Hook. Many of these theories— often promulgated as part of a grab-bag package by their promoters— were directly contradictory.
_Here’s an example.
_One big name figured out that Israel’s Mossad was behind the shooting. His proof? Well, everybody knows that the Mossad is murderous and that Israel has no problem killing children.
_This authority claims a three-man Mossad team pulled off the job— but then again, there are folks who say this investigator is dead wrong (pun intended) since, of course, nobody was killed at Sandy Hook at all, or least not enough people killed to justify a big-time Mossad operation of the kind described by that analyst.
_However, as far as the Mossad is concerned (vis-a-vis Sandy Hook) there were two different claims in this regard. Some said the Mossad did it to hurt President Obama, getting revenge against the president for not being pro-Israel enough. Others said the Mossad did it to help the president further along the conspiracy to grab America’s guns.
_In other words, if you think the Mossad did it, you have two entirely different (and quite contradictory) motives to choose from. And so, depending on what you think of Barack Obama, you have two different versions of the story that “The Mossad Was Behind Sandy Hook.”
_But the foundation of this theory—which is certainly delectable to anyone who has professed belief of Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and in 9-11—doesn’t have any basis in any given facts, the exciting scenario itself notwithstanding.
_Yet—believe it or not—after I publicly discounted Mossad involvement in Sandy Hook (on the basis that I had seen no actual proof—even circumstantial—of such involvement) I was accused of “covering up for the Mossad” and of being “a Zionist agent.” (Seriously.)
_In fact, there is no proof that Mossad assassins were involved in any shooting (real or staged) in Sandy Hook.
_How the Mossad was involved in Sandy Hook was in a way most of the great conspiracy theorists clearly were unable to figure out, so busy they were with distributing the increasingly more silly and unlikely conspiracy theories that were running wild on the Internet.
_The Mossad was hiding in plain sight and the patriot researchers and conspiracy theorists never saw it at all.
_It was clearly allies (or outright assets) of the Mossad—figures in Cass Sunstein’s Crisis Management gang—who were conjuring up and distributing the ridiculous stories that gained such currency. In effect, the patriots were passing on Mossad-sponsored black propaganda and they never understood that at all!
_And, naturally, this had the desired effect of making any and all conspiracy theorists—especially anyone who might date mention the dread word “Mossad”— look crazy,marginal and generally to be disbelieved.
_So, in that sense, the Mossad was behind Sandy Hook but not in the way that many Sandy Hook true believers might like to think.At the very least, the Mossad profited from Sandy Hook by being able to monitor (and manipulate) the conspiracy theories that emerged. It was a classic experiment in Crisis Management and Mind Control and the patriot dissidents never understood that at all.
_And that’s precisely why the bad folks at the Mossad and their allies among the Crisis Management Conspirators had a good laugh at the antics of the “patriots” who were hawking the latest disinformation inserted onto the Internet designed to make those patriots look foolish.
_But despite the contradictions in this realm (and in other aspects of the stories circulating about Sandy Hook) that didn’t seem to phase many who helped spread the stories saying,“I’m just passing on what I’ve heard.” These people actually believed that as a member of “The Crowd” they were doing their patriotic duty, having no idea they were being manipulated by the very forces they were seeking to combat!
_The Crisis Management Conspirators had once again put the theoretical precepts of their High Priest—LeBon—into practice by conjuring up (and putting into distribution via the Internet) the most audaciously ridiculous narratives.They knew full well that “The Crowd” would buy into these stories without question.As LeBon wrote:
_Because so much of this material was being so quickly and so widely distributed and then being re-distributed by others eager for new information about Sandy Hook, these improbable and ridiculous notions effectively became a matter of fact. And, as LeBon said, the “marvellous”—that is, the most striking, even outrageous—aspects of the Sandy Hook theories were what took hold.
_Before long, it was being said that accused Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza hadn’t even fired a single shot that day.According to the story, he had never even been in the school that day—not alive, at least. The story was that Lanza had been formally declared dead by the Social Security administration one day before the shooting—and that he died in New Hampshire (a state away). The real conspirators behind Sandy Hook had not only killed Lanza the day before,but—evidently following the law (!)—they had made certain to register his death with the Social Security administration, law-abiding folks that these conspirators were.
_When some “theorists”were pressed on this point, they could only respond,“Oh, well, they wanted us to discover that.This was their way of confounding us and showing us they could do anything they wanted. They wanted us to see that there really was much more to the story but they also wanted to display their power to cover up the truth.”
_Hardly a day had gone by before it was alleged that the police and fire departments were involved in the conspiracy, deliberately blocking the exits to the school during the shooting for the purpose of ensuring that the killers could rack up as high a body count as possible.
_The county coroner’s public persona rubbed people the wrong way. Somebody pronounced the judgment that he wasn’t “acting right” for someone who had just performed autopsies on a bunch of purportedly dead children and therefore he definitely had to be in on the act. He was just “too weird.”
_Soon enough, that was the final word on the matter among dissidents. Somebody had said it, so therefore it had to be true.
_But the real question is this: WHO first said it and why did THEIR judgment effectively become the last word on the subject—“proof”of a much-bigger conspiracy?
_Nobody seemed to know precisely where so much of the “dissident” opinions were coming from—but whatever was said was freely passed on as though it constituted solid proof of “something.”
_Because the police initially prevented families from viewing the bullet- ripped corpses of the children, word spread that the families never once saw their dead children at all, despite the fact there were open casket funerals for a number of the children the conspiracy theorists said had never really died.
_Wax figures in the coffins,maybe? Designed to fool the parents who believed that their children had been killed? (Or were the parents, as some said, in on the conspiracy?)
_“If they reported that the families couldn’t see the bodies,” demand ed those who said they were “just asking questions,” then why, they asked,didn’t the media then report that the families were finally allowed to see the bodies?
_In fact, as anyone who has watched any of the standard police procedural dramas that occupy much of television today knows full well, it is not police procedure to allow the bodies of crime victims to be immediately inspected by the families. And no, that’s not “just Hollywood.” That’s how it really works.
_Ask your local policeman.
_In fact, families were later allowed to view the remains of their dead loved ones and in several instances (brought to my attention) there were open caskets for children who had died.
_Here’s the story:
_In a radio broadcast on Jan. 20, 2013 I had urgently warned truth seekers not to be taken in by all of this emerging nonsense and came under a great deal of criticism from many good folks who were fervent believers in the theory that no children had died and that the stories told by surviving Sandy Hook teachers (and children) were all lies.
_However, I was heartened when—during an email exchange between myself and two well-known and respected patriots, Carol Asher, the longtime assistant to famed peace officer Jack McLamb, and Ron Neil of the Dollar DVD Project Liberty (see the website at onedollardvdproject. com)—Ron sent me this email saying: “You surprised me with your attitude about Sandy Hook. I respect your opinion and will be more careful on this subject.You reminded me that we must focus and not get sidetracked.”
_(My whole point from the start! But most people who had joined the Sandy Hook frenzy couldn’t quite see that, as Ron Neil clearly did.
_And—to the heart of the matter—Ron also sent Carol and I a communication from one of his correspondents who was commenting critically on allegations that Sandy Hook teacher Kaitlin Roig was a fraud.
_While Roig was being hailed as a heroine for having rescued her students, there were truth seekers who had become convinced by the disinformation from the Crisis Management Conspirators that Roig was an audacious liar.Neil’s correspondent took issue with the claim—circulating on the Internet—that Roig wasn’t even a teacher.
_In fact, she wrote: “She [Roig] is my grandson’s teacher and I know that part is factual,” adding a very real warning for truth seekers:
_So although there was very real proof that Roig was a Sandy Hook teacher, there were people who were saying that she was actually a “Crisis Actor”—much more about the Crisis Actor theories later—who was playing a part to help perpetrate a gigantic fraud.
_However, one truth seeker—recognizing that there was something wrong with all of this—commented in response to an Internet posting of a video of an interview with Roig that critics “proved” she was a liar, an audacious actress posing as a heroine:
_(A personal note: My oldest brother and his wife were married on the very day just hours her cousin and two of their childhood friends— who were supposed to attend that wedding—were killed in a tragic explosion. Nobody—absolutely nobody—perceived their decision to proceed with the marriage as being crass or as inappropriate.)
_But in the wake of Sandy Hook, it became an article of faith that anyone who seemed to affirm the“official” story in any way was lying. And it was such an attitude that gripped the minds of truth seekers to the point, as Ron Neil’s aforementioned correspondent said, that “We are looking like ‘nuts.’”
_But truth seekers had become so much a part of “The Crowd” that they couldn’t see what was happening and how they were effectively discrediting themselves in the minds of the public.
_And then the fact that the police would not release particular details of the shooting was said to be “proof” that there was a cover-up. But, again, the truth is that even a cursory reading of any daily newspaper reporting on the most mundane of events involving a police investigation will reveal—time and time again—that the police just simply do not go about releasing a lot of data while any investigation is going on. That’s a fact that can be confirmed by even the most casual reference to any given newspaper in any town or city in the country.
_However, under the clever contrivance of the Crisis Management Conspirators,honest truth seekers had become totally distracted,caught up in minutiae that was absolutely irrelevant but which, nonetheless, seemed to possess the patriot movement, as if by magic.
_The proverbial “Crowd” had been caught up in a whirlwind of deliberate disinformation. It was as though some people genuinely wanted to believe that nothing—absolutely nothing—was true.That all was a lie. And a lot of cheap hucksters—along with the Crisis Management Conspirators—played on this.
_It was even said that the governor of Connecticut had advance knowledge of the impending “event”—we’ll call it an event, rather than a shooting, since a lot of people don’t think anybody was really shot at Sandy Hook in the first place!
_The basis of this rumor was the fact the governor had said publicly that he had been told that such an event could happen.
_What the governor was saying—and this was no secret—was that public schools and other venues—public and private, including shopping malls, bus stations, etc—had been training their own personnel in the matter of dealing with such an emergency.
_However, the governor’s comment—based on something that had been widely reported for months, even years, on end in the mass media (that is, how communities were preparing to deal with such events)— was twisted and presented as a Freudian slip that revealed the governor’s foreknowledge of the impending crisis at Sandy Hook.
_According to one claim, it was Attorney General Eric Holder (evidently another of the many conspirators) who briefed the governor a full month in advance that there was going to be a phony happening at Sandy Hook to be presented to the public as a “school shooting.”
_How many other public officials and law enforcement were brought into the loop no one could really say for sure, but then, again, it had already been suggested (as noted earlier) that the local police and fire departments were part of the massacre (or, at least, the cover-up). It seemed like the entire town was involved. But, then again, there were those who were saying that no massacre had even really happened!
_It came down to this: There were some 500 students at Sandy Hook. However, as we’ve said, some people don’t believe there really was a functioning school there at all. And it is said that—of those 500 students—20 of them (along with their families and others) faked their deaths.But some truth seekers—influenced by the disinformation of the Crisis Management Conspirators—now question whether at least some—if not all—of these students ever even existed!
_But accepting the idea that 20 students are no longer officially alive (and thus presumably in hiding) that means there are some 480 other students (and roughly 960 parents) and lord knows how many thousands upon thousands of siblings, grandparents, aunts and uncles related to the “surviving” 480 kids who are participating in one of the most extraordinary hoaxes of modern history.
_Meanwhile, others said, Newtown, Connecticut and its environs was an outpost of Satanism and that most of the people in town were Satanists.
_That explained why virtually everyone was involved in the conspiracy designed to portray a non-event as a bloody massacre.
_When sober patriot critics pointed out that Satanists are known to engage in real blood-letting and don’t generally “fake” such events, preferring the very real slaughter of little children, those who were advocates of the theory that “the Satanists” had helped conjure the Sandy Hook hoax were hard-pressed to respond.
_Others claimed there were people in Newtown who knew the whole affair was a “hoax” and wanted to speak out (or who were speaking out privately) but they didn’t want their names revealed.Those people were either being blackmailed or coerced in some fashion.
_In other words, an entire community—a town of nearly 30,000 people— was held under such control that not a single person would (or could) go public and blow the whistle and expose the hoax!
_The theory is yours to choose: Either most of the people in the town were Satanists or otherwise somehow in on the plot or most of the people were somehow being prevented from daring to speak out.
_And part of the whole big plot—so some say—is that (as we keep reminding you) there wasn’t even really a functioning school at the structure in Sandy Hook where the “phony” shooting took place.
_I kid you not.
_Those unfamiliar with all of the give-and-take that erupted on the Internet simply have no idea how truly outlandish it all became. It does get a little confusing, to be sure, but that didn’t stop people from spreading the stories.
_For God’s sake,don’t let anything stand in the way of a good story— especially if attracts traffic to your Internet website (and brings you a bundle full of cash contributions).
_On one occasion a very prominent “patriot” radio broadcaster extended his sympathies to the people of Newtown for the lives lost at Sandy Hook and then,minutes later, on the same broadcast, referred to the matter as a gigantic hoax that never happened.
_Why the broadcaster felt the need to extend his sympathy to Newtown for a tragedy that hadn’t really taken place remains a mystery (to me). But he had a lot of followers who hung on his every word.
_All of that having been said, it’s no surprise, when we continue to review the work of Gustave Le Bon—who provided the playbook for the Crisis Management Conspirators—to see that Le Bon had been able to project with absolute certainly that the insertion of wild claims into “The Crowd” would prove a perfect means of splitting the dissident movement from within.
_Le Bon described what he called“the intolerance,dictatorialness and conservatism of crowds,” and recognizing this factor, the Crisis Management Conspirators played this phenomenon to the hilt.
_These malicious manipulators knew full well that the moment cautious, detail-oriented, fact-focused researchers questioned the disinformation and nonsense that this would enrage those in“The Crowd” who had been coopted into what had essentially become a Sandy Hook Cult. Here’s how Le Bon put it:
_As incredible as it may seem to readers who will learn of this for the first time, even those who dared to suggest that perhaps children did actually die at Sandy Hook were called “traitors” by other patriots who had bought into the disinformation being inserted into the minds of patriots via the Crisis Management Conspirators working to discredit “conspiracy theories” in any form.
_Thanks to the Orwellian manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief in Sandy Hook as having been a massive hoax was essentially being instituted as a virtual litmus test as to“who’s a real patriot and who isn’t.” Those who didn’t believe Sandy Hook was a massive hoax are denounced as having been “bribed, blackmailed, or coerced” or just having simply “changed sides.”
_Veteran patriots said they had never seen anything like it—and they recognized it was because of the influence of the Internet (or rather, the influence of those Crisis Management Conspirators who were abusing the Internet for their own insidious purposes).
_In short, Sandy Hook effectively emerged as a cult, with its own unique built-in theology that cannot be questioned. To raise any doubts about the foundation of the cult was—and still is—considered heresy. Anyone who doubted even the most unlikely portion of the Sandy Hook theories was portrayed as a “traitor to the patriot movement”—or that’s what the Crisis Management Conspirators wanted patriots to think!
_The successful introduction by the Crisis Management Conspirators of their own disinformation into the patriot movement had set in motion a very real crisis—in and of itself—in which real patriots were being crucified for standing up and calling out the real conspirators for trying to mislead patriots.
_One longtime critic of gun control was accused of lending support to pro-gun control forces because he believed children died at Sandy Hook—a total disconnect, of course, but illustrative of the kind of mindset that was taking hold.
_Another person was accused of being “pro-Obama” because he doubted some Sandy Hook theories, the apparent presumption being that since Sandy Hook took place under the hated Obama’s watch that anyone who believed the official story therefore had to be pro-Obama for believing the basic claim that a crazed lone gunman was responsible.
_(On the other hand, though,as we’ve noted, some of the others who believed that there was a bigger story to Sandy Hook believed Israel’s Mossad had carried out the crime in order to hurt President Obama whereas others believed the Mossad did so in order to help him.)
_So, as we said, choose your favorite theory—courtesy of Cass Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_It was almost like Alice in Wonderland—definitely beyond belief. If there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’s this: There’s more to the Sandy Hook story than even the most dedicated conspiracy theorists understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.”
_The Crisis Management Conspirators (via Internet monitoring) were able to see preciselyWHO spread the rumors via email and fromWHAT websites and sources they got their information in the first place.
_As a direct consequence of this one event and the frenzy surrounding it, the powers-that-be had an absolute first-ever 24/7 fool-proof method of monitoring communications and resources within the circles of the dissident movement.
_The Sandy Hook venture itself was just stage one in the scheme, giving them the opportunity to observe and weigh the responses of the conspiracy theorists to the actual events that had occurred and to monitor their responses to the often-illogical and contradictory tales being bandied about by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_On the broader scale, in the bigger picture, the Crisis crowd was laying the groundwork to have—in the future—a more precise, more calibrated focus on the exchange of information by the conspiracy theorists and to be able to actually dominate and direct the course of their thinking altogether. And, naturally—if necessary—to discredit them in no uncertain terms in the minds of the general population.
_Perhaps even more importantly, the Sunstein-inspired program of monitoring and manipulation now made it possible to lay the groundwork—as appropriate—in manipulating opinion during some future major event, perhaps one already well-planned in advance— another 9-11, if you will—or some scheme still in the works.
_Sandy Hook was indeed a “false flag” of the first order—and it had the ultimate impact of totally misdirecting the attention of patriots from the real forces that were laying out the misinformation that was so thoroughly misdirecting them.
_In the end, one of the most respected longtime patriot voices, Devvy Kidd, dared to put it all in perspective.On April 28, 2013, on her website at newswithviews.com,Kidd laid it on the line:
_And, if truth be told, there were many so-called “leaders” of the would-be “truth movement” who were afraid to dissent, fearful of being called “traitors” and accused of being “agents of Barack Obama and the NewWorld Order” if they dared to say that the foolish madness inserted into the minds of truth seekers (via the machinations of the Conspiracy Management gang) was just that: a bunch of foolishness.
_The whole Sandy Hook venture was largely a “private” affair, in that the circumstances surrounding the event were essentially limited to what did—or did not—take place within the confines of that elementary school in Newtown.
_However, not long afterward—on April 15, 2013—with the very “public” event involving the Boston Marathon (on the very open and public streets of Boston) the Crisis Management Conspirators were able to fine tune what they had already honed into a specialized “science”: a tool of Orwellian manipulation of the first—and worst—order.
_With Boston, the Sunstein thesis—now a live-action, real-time project in motion, having been successfully tested with Sandy Hook—was adapted to a much bigger,more broad-ranging event that (all of the nonsensical theories accompanying it notwithstanding) had all the earmarks of having been a very real “false flag”operation of Israel’s Mossad. But, once again, the truth seekers were misdirected . . .
_The manipulation by the Crisis Management Conspirators of the events at Sandy Hook was, in retrospect, a quite logical response to the phenomenon of 9-11 truthseeking (much of it Internet-based) which, in turn, had its own antecedents in the search for the truth surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing and the JFK assassination so many years before.
_In that sense,we might suggest, there was indeed a secret connection, so to speak, between 9-11 and Sandy Hook—but it’s one that even the most fervent believers in the “big” story of Sandy Hook never realized, precisely because of the fact they had found themselves (most of them, to this day, unknowingly) caught in the web of disinformation being spun by the high-level Crisis Management Conspirators.
_And one of the biggest cons of all perpetrated upon the legitimate truth seekers was the legend of “The Crisis Actors”—mentioned earlier— that came to be an article of faith surrounding Sandy Hook and later again, even more so, following the events at the Boston Marathon.
_And as we’ve already noted (perhaps all too often) in the wake of Sandy Hook many people actually believed that there hadn’t even been any gunplay at all—that no children and no adults were shot that day, that it was all a big staged event, with the purported victims and their families (along with law enforcement) in on the deal.
_This is where the now much-discussed topic of “The Crisis Actors” was brought into play.And, in many respects, it may have been one of the most ingenious scams ever pawned off on American patriots designed to misdirect their attention.
_It was right out of Cass Sunstein’s playbook.
_During the wake of Sandy Hook, people got so distracted talking about the Crisis Actors and the claim that "Lanza was dead the day before the shooting which really didn't happen and in which no kids were really killed," that, in many cases, they didn't do what they should have done: Lobby forcefully against the gun control measures that were being crafted as a consequence of the tragedy at Sandy Hook.
_Many patriots became genuinely convinced that by talking about “The Crisis Actors” that they were winning the day and convincing people of the dangers of gun control when, in fact, they were actually misdirecting good people and, for all intents and purposes,discrediting honest Americans who were opposed to gun control.
_As a result of the widespread distribution of claims that Sandy Hook was a big fraud being perpetrated by “Crisis Actors” many Americans concluded that the opponents of gun control were trouble-makers, wildeyed conspiracy theorists and just generally to be dismissed.
_That, ultimately,was the aim of the Crisis Management Conspirators. Their introduction of the concept of“CrisisActors” into the debate was part and parcel of the very real conspiracy—first outlined by Cass Sunstein—to discredit conspiracy theories in general.
_And all of this undoubtedly did immense damage to the reputation of many good patriots who opposed gun control and who were led into the trap of focusing on the Crisis Actor legend rather than on the very real and important issue at hand.
_And what is so remarkable is that, to this day, although patriotic folks who regularly discuss Sandy Hook and Boston speak in hushed (and not-so-hushed) tones about “The Crisis Actors” and the role that they supposedly played in those events, there is not one single individual who is able to say precisely “who” it was who first introduced the concept of the CrisisActors into the vernacular of the Sandy Hook truth seekers.And that is telling, in and of itself.
_We know, for example, following the JFK assassination, that it was Mark Lane who largely popularized the term“grassy knoll”—relating to the likely positioning in Dealey Plaza of one of the gunmen who fired on President Kennedy.
_But Lane himself is the first to admit that he first heard the term “grassy knoll” used by one of the assassination witnesses, Jean Hill,who used that term in an interview.And Hill herself has said that this just happened to be the particular phraseology that popped into her head in seeking a way to describe that geographic location in Dealey Plaza.
_And that’s how the term “grassy knoll” ultimately came into widespread parlance, not only in reference to the JFK assassination but also in reference to “conspiracy theories” in general.
_But there is absolutely nobody who can explain just who it was who “figured out” that Crisis Actors had been utilized as part of the Sandy Hook (and later the Boston Marathon) conspiracy.
_And the reason for that is that this whole concept of Crisis Actors having been dispatched as part of the conspiracy was a creation of the Crisis Management Conspirators themselves.
_Now let it be said that there really are people known as Crisis Actors.They do exist.They’ve been around for a while.
_However, the proponents of the Crisis Actors theory relating to Sandy Hook (and later the Boston Marathon) would have people believe that the existence of CrisisActors is some deep dark secret, that they are part of a long-standing high-level covert operation kept from the public, perhaps a creation of Homeland Security or the CIA or some combination of elements of the emerging American Police State, paid agents of the vaunted military-industrial-complex.
_It’s an exciting theory, to be sure, but the truth is that—for years—you have been able go to the Internet and find a number of Internet websites of real-life profit-making businesses that train and provide Crisis Actors who interact with government (local, state and federal) as well as private industries and enterprises in preparing to deal with crisis events of various kinds, including mass shootings, hostage situations, earthquakes, fires, riots—all manner of chaos.
_One such business engaging in the Crisis Actor industry (which is what it amounts to) is crisisactors.org.
_On the website of that company, their promotional material reads:
“Crisis Actors: Trained Players and Actors Making it Real,” stating that their mission is: “Helping schools and first responders create realistic drills, full-scale exercises, high-fidelity simulations, and interactive 3D films.” The website even includes a section called “Crisis Acting News” highlighting a variety of events in which their skills and services have been utilized (and openly publicized in newspapers and televised by broadcast outlets in local communities across the country).
_Here are just a few examples from crisisactors.org, citing Internet links to some of the newspapers and broadcast outlets that have cited the work of Crisis Actors in their particular communities.
_The existence, then, of Crisis Actors is no big secret. But it wasn’t until the Crisis Management Conspirators deliberately hyped the legend (via the Internet) that Crisis Actors were part of the conspiracy at Sandy Hook that many people became aware of their existence.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators inserted the legend of the Crisis Actors onto the Internet with the expectation that it would become a part of the lore of Sandy Hook and help add confusion and—more importantly—play a significant part in discrediting conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists in the minds of the broad general public.
_Essentially, in relation to Sandy Hook, in particular, the Crisis Actors Theory held that, for example, Robbie Parker, the father of one of the children killed at Sandy Hook,was actually a Crisis Actor.
_The claim was based on the fact that—just prior to giving a public statement expressing his horror at the loss of his child—Parker smiled and laughed and then asked if the cameras were on yet and then,while speaking, referred to written notes. Nobody who had actually lost a child under such tragic circumstances, it was proclaimed,would actually smile or laugh.Nor would they need to refer to written notes.
_Such allegations are patently ridiculous. People react differently to tragedy. Some people put on a brave face when confronted with tragedy.And most people have never been confronted with a horde of reporters and television cameras converging on their home in the wake of such an internationally-publicized tragedy in which they (and their dead child) have unwittingly become a part.
_The idea someone would need to rely on notes to speak publicly is not so outrageous.Very few people are trained in public speaking and often need notes, just as even professional speakers rely on written texts when giving their own presentations. But the fact that Robbie Parker was using notes was suddenly “proof” that he was a Crisis Actor!
_So when the Crisis Management Conspirators put out the idea that Robbie Parker was a Crisis Actor whose child hadn’t been killed, Parker began receiving threats for “play acting” and the controlled media (allied with the Crisis Management Conspirators) immediately brought this to the attention of the general public who were quite correctly horrified that “those conspiracy theorists”would actually question the grief of a mourning parent and suggest that he was “faking” his child’s death.
_What most of those who bought into the idea Parker was a Crisis Actor never seemed to consider was the point that if he was a Crisis Actor, he probably wouldn’t have needed written notes when he “performed” for the cameras. Actors—you see—rely upon their skills to remember their lines.Actors generally don’t use cue cards or at least not ones that they hold right there in front of them while speaking!
_Later, it was even alleged that Parker’s dead child was actually photographed in the presence of Barack Obama when he visited Newtown to meet with the families. In other words, that the “phony” Parker and his family (all part of the conspiracy) had brazenly dared to allow the supposedly dead child to be shown to be alive after it was said that she had been killed at Sandy Hook.
_The claim was based on the fact that the surviving sisters of the dead child bore a striking resemblance to the victim—that happens in families, you know—and that one of the children in the picture with Obama seemed to be wearing the same dress that the dead child had previously been photographed wearing.That was “proof” that it was the dead child who was, it was said, still alive.
_But any family with multiple sons or daughters knows that the clothing of older children is passed on to younger children. But then, again,when it came time to promote the idea of Crisis Actors—and the theme that “no children died at Sandy Hook”—simple points such as that seemed to get lost in the Crisis Management Conspiracy Barndance.
_In another instance, a parent of one of the dead children was accused of being a Crisis Actor because the parent said in an interview that one of his surviving children said that she wanted to urge President Obama to support gun control. No child in grade school, it was said, would be thinking about a political issue such as gun control. Especially, it was added, after one of her siblings had been killed.
_The idiocy of such a claim should be obvious. School children do have political opinions and even “vote” in mock presidential elections every four years—from first grade through graduation—even if they don’t necessarily understand the political issues.
_Young children do know who the president is and in this “Information Age” they do hear about issues such as gun control, in particular, on a 24/7 basis, whether or television or radio or even on the Internet, and especially after such a crisis as Sandy Hook.
_And it’s entirely possible that a child who had lost a sibling at a school shooting would want to express her concerns about gun control to “the president” who is perceived as the man who rules America and who makes important decisions about big issues such as gun control.
_In fact, they said, a lot of the well-known Sandy Hook personalities featured in the media were actors—why, they never even lived in Sandy Hook at all! (Just as they had said that the school was not even a functioning school at the time of the purported shooting!)
_Various cuts of what is called“raw”media footage of one Sandy Hook celebrity—a notably obnoxious character named Gene Rosen (a veritable stereotype for a particular type of Jewish caricature often seen in Hollywood comedy)—telling bits and pieces of what he claimed to have seen, was cited as proof Rosen had “practiced” his lines (like an actor) and that the story he was telling was just not true.
_Rosen—who was clearly a publicity hound who reveled in his brief brush with the proverbial “15 minutes of fame”—was over-the-top to the point of being annoying and—in fact—the media people who had interviewed Rosen had taped him at various moments and Rosen was clearly fine-tuning, even rehearsing what he was about to say in the various “cuts” of the raw footage that later popped up on the Internet.
_As such it was immediately insinuated that Rosen was a Crisis Actor dispatched by the powers-that-be to craft a bit of film propaganda for the benefit of the American public to help perpetrate the“lie” that there had been a shooting at the school.
_But here is what is important to remember . . .
_What all of the patriot conspiracy theorists seemed to miss was this big question: How was it that this raw footage—taped by a cameramen from the Controlled Media—just happened to be leaked to the conspiracy theorists as “proof” that Rosen was a Crisis Actor?
_Clearly, there were people in the Controlled Media—in league with the Crisis Management Conspirators—who were deliberately helping propagate the legend of the Crisis Actors by leaking raw footage such as this.
_They knew with absolute certainty that the people in “The Crowd” who had bought into the CrisisActors theory would jump on the Rosen story in a heartbeat.And that is precisely what they did.
In the end, you see, the real CrisisActors were not the parents of the murdered children (or even the ridiculous Gene Rosen).
_Instead the Crisis Actors were actually those “cyber shills” (posing as “truth seekers”) who were acting out a very specific role—acting on behalf of the Crisis Management Conspirators—in bombarding the Internet with all of the outlandish stories that distracted patriots and truth seekers from the big picture and thereby helping discredit all forms of conspiracy theories (and conspiracy theorists) in general.
_It’s just so damned obvious.
_In fact, it’s typical Zionist Israeli trickery:
_(1) Operating in plain sight;
_(2) Standing there in vampire’s garb,pointing at someone dressed as an angel, and shouting,“There’s the vampire over there!” and
_(3) Thoroughly distracting everyone from the big picture.
This frequent Zionist tactic of accusing others of what they are in fact guilty of has been aptly described as “accusatory projection” or “accusatory inversion.”
_The Crisis Actors theme got ever more ridiculous as the story was repeated again and again.At one point it was even claimed a catering truck—said to be on the scene at Sandy Hook—had been dispatched to cater food and beverages for the Crisis Actors at work perpetuating the conspiracy, just as—it was pointed out—catering trucks will be found on the scene when Hollywood films are being made “on location.”
_I’ve personally seen one of these catering trucks parked just a few blocks from my own home on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. when actor Clint Eastwood was filming a rooftop chase scene for his action film In the Line of Fire.Despite this, however, I sincerely doubt that the Sandy Hook “conspiracy” was so fine-tuned that the conspirators sent a catering truck to keep the Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook well nourished.
_Yet, I am here to tell you that the Crisis Management Conspirators managed to convince a lot of well meaning people that this is actually what really happened. (Oh, those nasty caterers—conspirators all!)
_And here’s something about the Crisis Actors disinformation that needs to be mentioned—and this will astound many readers who will learn about this for the first time . . .
_In fact, one of the most vociferous proponents of the Crisis Actors theory—a character who uses the name “DallasGoldbug”—also put forth the following assertions regarding other “actors” he claims to have discovered posturing in the public arena:
_In fact, Gustave LeBon—the grand guru of the the Crisis Management Conspirators—had described how the “crowd” could be dazzled by all sorts of images and in the aftermath of the Boston Maraton bombing, “The Crowd” of our modern day was indeed captivated by dazzling images which they believed “proved” that there had been hanky panky on the streets of Boston.
_In fact, many "truth seekers" picked up the stories being put out by the phony patriots—the Crisis Actors working for the Sunstein gang—that there wasn't even really any bombing at all! It was akin to the claim—which had already proven successful in winning credence with the real patriots—that there hadn’t even been a shooting at Sandy Hook.
_And while the whole story of what really happened at Boston has yet to be unraveled,what we do know is that two young Muslims (the Tsarnaev brothers) were accused of the crime—yet another Muslim “false flag” akin to the 9-11 tragedy.
_And we also know that evidence indicates that the intelligence services of the United States,Russia—and certainly Israel—had their eyes on the Tsarnaevs for a long time prior to the bombing, just as the ADL and other Israeli-connected elements were “monitoring” Timothy McVeigh prior to the Oklahoma City bombing.
_However—at this juncture—we don’t know the entire scenario, but we do know there has been a lot of disinformation put into circulation designed to deflect attention away from Israel which is certainly (beyond question) the prime beneficiary of the crime as a consequence of the purported danger from the Muslim world continuing to be in the forefront of the mind (and concerns) of the American people.
_In short, Boston was simply a replay of the 9-11 false flag that redirected American thinking in the wake of that tragedy.
_It was a reinvigoration of the template for terror utilized in 9-11 and in the Oklahoma bombing and in the JFK assassination involving, yet again, the widespread dissemination of carefully-crafted disinformation designed to cover Israeli involvement in those acts of terror.
_(For my own part, from the beginning, it has been my opinion that Israel was behind the Boston bombing for the precise purpose of conjuring up another Muslim“false flag.” I expressed this view in a broadcast interview at theuglytruth.wordpress.com with Mark Glenn who shares my view on this matter.)
_Yet, the Crisis Management Conspirators successfully distracted truth seekers—who were convinced that, once again, the authorities were covering up the truth about the Boston bombing—by cranking up the Crisis _Actors legend (first spawned in the wake of Sandy Hook).
_Rather than focusing on who was behind the bombing, truth seekers focused instead on stories—with accompanying videos and photographic images of the chaos following the bombing—planted on the Internet in conjunction with the insistent claim that Crisis Actors were busy on the streets of Boston detaching false arms and legs and faking injuries and throwing around buckets of stage blood for the benefit of video cameras.
_All of the imagery captured the attention of the patriots who suddenly showed little—if any—interest in trying to determine who was responsible for the Muslim “false flag” that the Controlled Media was waving in the face of a horrified American public.
_Here is how Le Bon described precisely this kind of manipulation.
_One widely circulated proof of the “conspiracy” was a selection of several frames from a video of the bombing. A few frames were “analyzed”—a few frames that represented just a few seconds of time—and were “found” to show a woman (said to be a Crisis Actor) “giving hand signs” and helping other Crisis Actors fake blood and injuries.
_To do all of this—live—before very REAL people who were not Crisis Actors but who WERE on the scene, would take more than seconds to accomplish successfully.
_Anyone who has ever participated in the taping of a television show or even an amateur home movie—let alone a serious film production—knows how much time and work is involved making just one “incident” look real, -and that it can’t be accomplished in just seconds!
_But most people—including a lot of good patriots—have never been involved in any such production and don’t have any idea that even one second in, for example, an old-style 8mm movie, can amount to as many as 18 different frames. Meaning, of course, that those who were microanalyzing the films that they said “proved” there had been fakery were actually analyzing milli-seconds, for God’s sake!
_Such simple facts were lost in the “Crisis Actors Shuffle” that accompanied the frenzy over the Boston bombing.
_A lot of good patriots fell into what we might call, for want of a better way of describing it,“the Trap of Belief,” because they had become familiar, in years past, with people who were quite accurately and correcting analyzing the famous (although remarkably brief) bit of film known as the Zapruder Film of the JFK assassinaton.
_Again and again over the years a variety of analysts had de-constructed the film, frame by frame, to demonstrate the point that it was clear, on film, that the official Warren Commission version of the JFK assassination was repudiated by what purported to be an actual amateur 8mm film taken at the time of the JFK assassination.
_(Now, ironically, there are those who say that Zapruder film itself is some sort of forgery or an altered version of the original film or even a combination of several films made to appear to be one.And the truth is that past and present technology does make such things possible.)
_As such, having seen (over some 50 years) such analysis of the Zapruder film (and other images of the JFK assassination) again and again, on video, on the Internet, in books and magazines, patriots and truth seekers became accustomed to this technique of conspiracy inquiry.And knowing that this was the case, following Sandy Hook and Boston, the Crisis Management Conspirators went assiduously to work and deliberately played on this when they began hyping the claims that Crisis Actors had staged false injuries (in a fake bombing) for the benefit of the American population at large.
_The consequence of this was that when honest truth-seekers began circulating the stories that videos of the bombing were “fakes,” many serious-minded folks in the general public began to think, quite frankly, that these truth seekers were just plain crazy.
_There were people from all over the United States who had come to the Boston Marathon and they went home to tell friends and family about their narrow brush with disaster,only to hear that there were conspiracy theorists on the Internet who were saying that the bombing didn’t happen and that nobody really lost an arm or a leg.
_And the“proof”was a few seconds of one film that went viral on the Internet which convinced the truth seekers that it was all a big lie!
_If you have any doubts about this, go out and purchase a DVD of some current“action”film and listen to the director’s commentary.You’ll learn how, for example, one scene in a Hollywood film which occupies just a second or two (on film) can actually take up to as much as two or three days to film (sometimes on multiple locations,no less) not to mention the introduction of a wide array of computer-generated imagery and other technological advances,many of which didn’t even exist as little as ten or fifteen years ago.
_Did you really think that was a big ship sinking in the middle of the North Atlantic in James Cameron’s classic film Titanic?
_Did you really think that real people were falling down and hurting themselves as the ship sank?
_Of course you didn’t!
_In fact, some of the most mundane moments in that wide-ranging disaster film were actually the work of clever Hollywood legerdemain.
_Even the relatively brief and simple scene of the film’s romantic duo—Kate Winslett and Leonardo DiCaprio—at the stern of the ship whenWinslett’s character is threatening to jump overboard and commit suicide involved endless hours of filming using several different stages and multiple means of technological wizardry.
_If you were among those who were caught up in the legends surrounding Crisis Actors at the Boston Marathon and the stories on the Internet purporting to analyze just a moment or two of the events that took place there, then read that preceding paragraph again—no, in fact, read it twice—and consider the ramifications . . .
_As we said—and this is critical to understand—the point is that even a moment of drama on film can take literally days to produce and simply can not be carried out in just a few split seconds.
But those Crisis Management Conspirators who have been purveying the Crisis Actors false flag to mislead truth seekers know that most people have no idea how technologically advanced film-making has become, even at the same time it remains time-consuming and requires vast participation by multiple people at various levels So, then, in the context of the events at the Boston Marathon,what does all of this mean?
_It’s very simple . . .
_If the conspirators behind the events in Boston wanted to produce a piece of film to convince unwittingAmericans that a bombing did take place which injured many people—including those who lost arms and legs—they did not have to dispatch hordes of “Crisis Actors” onto the scene to engage in complicated motions of “reacting” to a bomb and then rolling about on the crowd pretending to be injured, hysterically clinging to severed arms and legs, throwing about fake blood, etc.
_That just isn’t how it works.
_IF there HAD been a major conspiracy to "fake" all of these things, the whole process COULD (and WOULD) have been done beforehand using high-tech computer generated images produced in a laboratory.
_The so-called Crisis Actors didn't even have to be ANYWHERE NEAR the bomb site and positioned where "honest witnesses" could have seen anything suspicious such as what has been claimed to have happened.
_For serious truth seekers—particularly those who were caught up in the legend of Crisis Actors at Boston who were purportedly busy faking injuries, throwing around fake blood, detaching prosthetic legs and arms, etc—a careful review of the wide-ranging “special features” section of the DVD of James Cameron’s Titanic is well worth their time.
_And the truth is that since Cameron’s classic first appeared on the screen in 1997—16 years ago—computer technology has grown by extraordinary leaps and bounds, such that Cameron’s own remarkable visual graphics in Titanic are, in many respects, almost extraordinarily antiquated by many new developments in the field.
_In fact, the “special features” section of virtually any DVD of any motion picture or television drama—especially those involving a lot of action—often provide a literal step-by-step videographic run-down of the amazing techniques of film-making, in particular the amazing CGI—computer-generated imagery—that has become so prevalent in even the most minimal ways that the average viewer would never expect.
_For example, on the DVD of the third season of the now-defunct crime drama,Body of Proof, one can see how outdoor scenes (filmed in Los Angeles but supposedly taking place in Philadelphia) are altered via CGI to eliminate palm trees from the image that is finally seen by the television viewer. Another scene deconstructed on that DVD demonstrates how the image (and sound) of a railroad train moving through a railroad yard is completely erased by CGI, such that all of the other action (and sound) taking place remains undisturbed.
_In other words, film-making technology has reached such a highly-advanced level that:
_• Virtually any scene or event can practically be conjured out of almost thin air.What appears to be a human speaking and moving about may, in fact, be a CGI, or even a robot with a talking, smiling human face imposed by computer upon it.
_• Any piece of real film imagery can be so altered that the final version of the film completely eliminates action that did take place or altered to include action that actually took place elsewhere and was then inserted by computer onto that imagery.
_Now—when confronted with such realities about the nature of film production and how quite ridiculous it is to suggest that Crisis Actors engaged in such complex (and quite unnecessary) on-site antics in Boston—a lot of red-faced truth seekers (who do realize they have been conned) fall back on the claim that the high-level conspirators behind Boston deliberately staged faulty video presentations that were easily “refutable” because—they say—the conspirators actually wanted the American people to know that the Boston bombing was a hoax.
_The apparent underlying theme here is that “Nothing is for real.
Everything is a lie. And the people who are responsible for these lies actually do want people to know that they are lies.That the people can do nothing to combat this conspiracy that operates in tandem with the Controlled Media in America.”
_That sounds good. It has a certain appeal to a certain mindset. But it doesn’t reflect the reality that, in fact, most Americans simply do not have any idea that the Internet is rife with rumors about Crisis Actors.
_But what a growing number of Americans do believe—as a consequence f propaganda from the Controlled Media—is that those people who are called “conspiracy theorists” by the media have some really crazy ideas and that they don’t believe that there was really a shooting in Sandy Hook that took the lives of 20 little children or that there wasn’t even really a bombing in Boston.
_And many Americans now believe that anything that reeks of a conspiracy theory—even relating to the JFK assassination or the Oklahoma bombing or 9-11—is the work of paranoid minds whose opinions are to be dismissed, along with (in particular) the idea that Israel had anything to do with those tragedies.
_That was precisely the design of those who helped make the truth seekers look “crazy” by feeding them a diet of extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook and Boston that took hold on the Internet like wildfire, even as the Crisis Management Conspirators were monitoring the communication networks between patriots here in the United States (and around the world) who were disseminating these stories.
_The bottom line is that what many came to believe about Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston (along with other similar nonsense) is just one big fat fraud—a lie—a distraction—deliberately perpetrated by the Crisis Management Conspirators to make truth seekers look silly.
_The real “BIG STORY” that has not yet set in or been realized and understood is this:
_The Crowd Control (and very real Mind Control) tactics—first laid out by Cass Sunstein—have been successfully set in motion and the long-term damage to serious inquiry into very real conspiracies—past and present and those of the future—has been costly and inestimable.
_We can only imagine what will happen when another very real crisis comes along and wonder what kind of “management”—or mismanagement as the case may be—will occur.We can only ponder the manner in which truth seekers will be once again be utterly misdirected and further marginalized.
_What happened with Sandy Hook and Boston is a very real lesson America’s “alternative” media should learn from—before it’s too late.
Steve Emerson: Saudi national questioned in Boston Marathon bombings to be deported on national security grounds next week
VIDEO - Steve Emerson - Saudi Man Cleared in Boston Bombing Now Being Deported?
Pamela Geller: Saudi National Deportation: American People Must Demand the Full Story
Pamela Geller: JIHADI ARRESTED IN HORRIFIC BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING
VIDEO - Robert Spencer - Boston bomb: "Wake up America Australia England"
Robert Spencer - Jihad in Boston?
Audio: Jihadwatch.org - Robert Spencer discusses the Boston jihad bombings on the Laura Ingraham Show
Steve Emerson Bungles It Again: Saudi National Not Being Deported
Steve Emerson Gets It Wrong–Again
Right won’t let go of Saudi conspiracy theory
Why is Steve Emerson still a “terrorism expert”?
After Boston explosions, a scapegoat emerges on the right
Following the New York Post's lead, a belief is affirmed: The Boston explosions must have been done by Muslims
Pamela Geller embraces Beck's conspiracy theory, fares even worse selling it
Glenn Beck conspiracy theory: What's his evidence?
VIDEO - Glenn Beck the "Boston Truther"
The right’s new Boston conspiracy theory
Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer Instantly Blame Muslims for Boston Attack, Followers Spew Vile Racism
Don’t hold your breath waiting for an apology
Anti-Muslim hate group leader Pamela Geller instantly jumped to the conclusion you might expect: JIHADI ARRESTED IN HORRIFIC BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING - Atlas Shrugs
Jihad in America. 2 dead, 80 injured. My deepest condolences to their loved ones. Monstrous. So did her camp follower Robert Spencer: Jihad: Feds Say Authorities Questioning Saudi National on Boston Terror Bombings - Jihad Watch.
And tonight ABC News White House correspondent Jon Karl reports:
One of Pamela Geller’s admirers comments:
Anti-Muslim hate group leader Pamela Geller instantly jumped to the conclusion you might expect: JIHADI ARRESTED IN HORRIFIC BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING - Atlas Shrugs
Jihad in America. 2 dead, 80 injured. My deepest condolences to their loved ones. Monstrous. So did her camp follower Robert Spencer: Jihad: Feds Say Authorities Questioning Saudi National on Boston Terror Bombings - Jihad Watch.
And tonight ABC News White House correspondent Jon Karl reports:
One of Pamela Geller’s admirers comments:
Good thing, we should’ve deported their sand nigger asses the minute after 9/11 or took the same actions. I don’t care if I’m racist I’m looking out for the security of my own country. The nigger we have in office is too “politically correct” to make any difference. Jesus Christ what is the world coming to.
(READ THE REST...)
VIDEO - Démontage de la théorie du complot des "acteurs" de l'attentat de Boston
English: Why there were no 'actors' at the Boston Marathon bombings
Traduction : SOTT
L'idée que nombre d'attaques « terroristes » sont en réalité perpétrées par des agences de renseignement gouvernementales n'est pas un concept nouveau (à Sott.net, cela fait dix ans que nous tentons de mettre en lumière les preuves de la complicité du gouvernement dans le « terrorisme islamique », par exemple). Ce qui est nouveau, c'est l'idée que ces attaques terroristes inspirées ou perpétrées par le gouvernement sont d'une façon ou d'une autre doublement « bidon » dans le sens où certains détails (voire tous les détails) de l'attaque n'ont en réalité pas vraiment eu lieu. L'idée est que l'attaque était non seulement bidon au sens où le gouvernement - et non des « terroristes musulmans » ou des « terroristes du pays » - était responsable, mais aussi au sens où les apparentes victimes étaient également bidon, leurs rôles, lorsque nécessaire, étant assurés par des « acteurs » travaillant vraisemblablement pour le gouvernement. L'allégation selon laquelle des « acteurs de crise » auraient été utilisés à la place de vraies victimes a été faite à propos de la fusillade de Sandy Hook en Décembre 2012, des plus récents attentats du marathon de Boston, et même de l'agression au couteau d'un soldat britannique, le 22 mai, à Londres.
Je suis pratiquement sûr que la moitié de la planète a vu cette photo.
 |
| Les attentats de Boston: Made in America |
L'idée que nombre d'attaques « terroristes » sont en réalité perpétrées par des agences de renseignement gouvernementales n'est pas un concept nouveau (à Sott.net, cela fait dix ans que nous tentons de mettre en lumière les preuves de la complicité du gouvernement dans le « terrorisme islamique », par exemple). Ce qui est nouveau, c'est l'idée que ces attaques terroristes inspirées ou perpétrées par le gouvernement sont d'une façon ou d'une autre doublement « bidon » dans le sens où certains détails (voire tous les détails) de l'attaque n'ont en réalité pas vraiment eu lieu. L'idée est que l'attaque était non seulement bidon au sens où le gouvernement - et non des « terroristes musulmans » ou des « terroristes du pays » - était responsable, mais aussi au sens où les apparentes victimes étaient également bidon, leurs rôles, lorsque nécessaire, étant assurés par des « acteurs » travaillant vraisemblablement pour le gouvernement. L'allégation selon laquelle des « acteurs de crise » auraient été utilisés à la place de vraies victimes a été faite à propos de la fusillade de Sandy Hook en Décembre 2012, des plus récents attentats du marathon de Boston, et même de l'agression au couteau d'un soldat britannique, le 22 mai, à Londres.
Lire plus..
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2013/04/21/a-commentary-on-the-marathon-murders
A Commentary on the Marathon Murders
by Richard Falk
April 21, 2013
The dominant reactions to the
horrific bombings on April 15th, the day of the running of the Boston
Marathon, as well as the celebration of Patriots Day, have been so far:
compassion for the victims, a maximal resolve to track down the
perpetrators, a pundit’s notebook that generally agrees that Americans
have been protected against terrorist violence since 9/11 and that the
best way to prevail against such sinister adversaries is to restore
normalcy as quickly as possible. In this spirit, it is best to avoid
dwelling on the gory details by darkly glamorizing the scene of mayhem
with flowers and homage. It is better to move forward with calm resolve
and a re-commitment to the revolutionary ideals that midwifed the birth
of the American nation. Such responses are generally benevolent,
especially when compared to the holy war fevers espoused by national
leaders, the media, and a vengeful public after the 9/11 attacks that
also embraced Islamophobic falsehoods. Maybe America has become more
poised in relation to such extremist incidents, but maybe not. It is
soon to tell, and the somewhat hysterical Boston dragnet for the
remaining at large and alive suspect does suggest that the wounds of
9/11 are far from healed.
For one thing, the scale and drama of
the Boston attack, while great, was not nearly as large or as
symbolically resonant as the destruction of the World Trade Center and
the shattering of the Pentagon. Also, although each life is sacred, the
magnitude of tragedy is somewhat conveyed by numbers, and the Marathon
incident has so far produced three deaths as compared to three thousand,
that is, 1/1000th of 9/11. Also important, the neocon presidency of
George W. Bush was in 2001, prior to the attacks, openly seeking a
pretext to launch a regime-changing war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq,
and the 9/11 events, as interpreted and spun, provided just the
supportive domestic climate needed for launching an aggressive war
against the Baghdad regime. The Iraq War was undertaken despite the UN
Security Council failure to lend its authority to such an American
deadly geopolitical venture and in the face of the largest anti-war
global demonstrations in human history. In 2001, the preferred American
grand strategy, as blueprinted by the ideologues of the American
Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution, was given a green light
by the Bush/Cheney White House even in the face of the red lights
posted both at the UN and in the streets of 600 or more cities around
the world.
Although there are many distressing
continuities that emerge if the Obama presidency is appraised by
comparison with the counter-terrorist agenda of his predecessors, there
are also some key differences of situation and approach. Obama came to
Washington as outspoken opponent of torture and of the Iraq War. He also
arrived after the failed wars of Afghanistan and Iraq, which had
devastated two countries, seemingly beyond foreseeable recovery, while
adding nothing to American security, however measured. These unlawful
wars wasted trillions expended over the several years during which many
Americans were enduring the hardships and pain of the deepest economic
recession since the 1930s. In other words, temporarily at least, the
Beltway think tanks and the government are doing their best to manage
global crises without embarking on further wars in a spirit of
geopolitical intoxication that was hallmark of the unipolar moment that
was invoked by Republicans to chide the Clinton presidency for its
wimpish failure to pursue American strategic interests in the Middle
East. Remember, as well, that this was the period of quick victorious
wars that were also cheap when measured by casualties or resources. The
Gulf War of 1991 and the NATO Kosovo War of 1999 were the poster
children of this supposed revolution in warfare that enabled the United
States and its allies to fight ‘zero casualty wars.’ At least it seems
that for the present irresponsible and unlawful warfare are no longer
the centerpiece of America’s foreign policy, as had become the case in
the first decade of the 21st century, although this is far from a
certainty. The war drums are beating at this moment in relation to both
North Korea and Iran, and as long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of
the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and
justice in the world should not rest easy.
Aside from the dangers and
unacceptability of promiscuous wars, there are other serious
deficiencies in how the United States sees itself in the world. We
should be worried by the taboo at this moment of 24/7
self-congratulatory commentary imposed on any type of self-scrutiny by
either the political leadership or the mainstream media. Unlike the
aftermath of 9/11, there are a few hopeful signs of awakening to this
one-eyed vision on the part of the citizenry. Listening to a PBS program
hours after the Boston event, I was struck by the critical attitudes of
several callers to the radio station: “It is horrible, but we in this
country should not be too surprised, given our drone attacks that have
killed women and children attending weddings and funerals in Afghanistan
and Pakistan.” Another caller asked, “Is this not a kind of retribution
for torture inflicted by American security forces acting under the
authority of the government, and verified for the world by pictures of
the humiliation of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib?” And another asked,
“In light of the authoritative reports of officially sanctioned torture
as detailed in the 577 page report of a task force chaired by two former
senators, one a Republican, the other a Democrat, and containing senior
military and security officials, has not the time come to apply the law
to the wrongdoers during the Bush presidency?” Can we not expect one
among our politicians, other than the Tea Party darling Rand Paul, to
have the courage to connect some of these dots? Should we not all be
meditating on W.H. Auden’s haunting line: “Those to whom evil is done/do
evil in return”?
The American global domination project
is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.
In some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to
experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if
there is no disposition to rethink US relations to others in the world,
starting with the Middle East. Some of us naively hoped that Obama’s
Cairo speech of 2009 was to be the beginning of such a process of
renewal, and although timid in many ways, it was yet possessed of a
tonality candidly acknowledged that relations with the Islamic world
needed fundamental moves by the US Government for the sake of
reconciliation, including the adoption of a far more balanced approach
to the Palestine/Israel impasse. But as the months passed, what became
evident, especially given the strong pushback by Israel and its
belligerent leader, Bibi Netanyahu, were a series of disappointing
reactions by Obama, which could be described as an accelerating
backpedaling in relation to opening political space in the Middle East.
Now at the start of his second
presidential term, it seems that Obama has given up altogether,
succumbing to the Beltway ethos of Israel First. Obama has acknowledged
the constraints on his freedom to maneuver on these foreign policy
issues, and seeks to confine his legacy ambitions to such domestic
concerns as immigration, gun control, and health care. In so doing, he
is virtually abandoning the international agenda except to manage crisis
diplomacy in ways that do not disturb the global status quo or weaken
America’s global reach. Obama’s March trip to Israel was highlighted by
his March 21st speech in Jerusalem, which was delivered as a love letter
to the Israeli public rather than qualifying as a good faith effort to
demonstrate his belief in a just peace. Such obsequious diplomacy was a
disappointment even to those of us with low expectations in what the
White House is willing to overcome the prolonged ordeal of the
Palestinian people.
Aside from the tensions of the moment,
self-scrutiny and mid-course reflections on America’s global role is
long overdue. Such a process is crucial both for the sake of the
country’s own future security and also in consideration of the wellbeing
of others. Such adjustments will eventually come about either as a
result of a voluntary process of self-reflection or through the force of
unpleasant events. How and when this process of reassessment occurs
remains a mystery. Until it does, America’s military prowess and the
abiding confidence of its leaders in hard power diplomacy makes the
United States a menace to the world and to itself. Such an observation
is as true if the more avowedly belligerent Mitt Romney rather than the
seemingly dovish Barack Obama was in the White House. Such bipartisan
support for maintaining the globe-girdling geopolitics runs deep in the
body politic, and is accompanied by the refusal to admit the evidence of
national decline. The signature irony is that the more American decline
is met by a politics of denial, the more rapid and steep will be the
decline, and the more abrupt and risky will be the necessary shrinking
of the global leadership role so long played by the United States. We
should be asking ourselves at this moment, “How many canaries will have
to die before we awaken from our geopolitical fantasy of global
domination?”
Blowback Will Continue
to Haunt the United States
• Jewish professor vilified for saying U.S. policy provokes terrorism
By Michael Collins Piper
for American Free Press
One of America’s most outspoken academics is under fire again, once more accused of “anti-Semitism”—even though he’s Jewish—and charged with being “anti-American.” Dr. Richard Falk’s latest crime is having suggested the Boston Marathon incident was a result of the misconduct of U.S. foreign policy.
The late Chalmers Johnson, another harsh critic of American global adventurism—often referred to as the New World Order—famously described such unpleasant consequences as “blowback.” Falk sees a great deal of blowback ahead unless drastic changes are soonmade in the direction of U.S. policy.
Earlier, Falk upset many by writing the foreword to the hotly controversial book by Dr. David Ray Griffin—The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9-11—which raised serious questions about the U.S. government’s version of 9-11.
Addressing the government contention that the Boston bombing was the work of two young Muslims dissatisfied with American policy, Falk took a broad-ranging view of U.S. global relations and predicted a bleak future if things continue on the course they have during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
One Jewish academician is under fire for suggesting that America’s foreign policy results in more terrorism.
Writing in Foreign Policy Journal on April 21, Falk slammed what he called “the American global domination project”—and concluded it is “bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.” In fact, he said, “in some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if there is no disposition to rethink U.S. relations to others in the world, starting with the Middle East.”
Falk summarized the consequences of what he referred to as “the failed wars” in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not only did those wars devastate those countries, while adding nothing to American security, but, he pointed out, “these unlawful wars wasted trillions expended over the several years during which many Americans were enduring the hardships and pain of the deepest economic recession since the 1930s.”
Republicans—typically—are up in arms over Falk’s assessment, demanding Falk be ousted from his UN post, but the no-nonsense professor has not spared Obama from criticism either.
Referring to what he calls Obama’s “obsequious diplomacy” and “backpedaling” in dealing with Israel, Falk said that although some at first saw signs Obama might be moving to put a brake on Israel, “it seems that Obama has given up altogether, succumbing to the Beltway ethos of ‘Israel first’.”
While Obama and the American foreign policy elite initially appeared to be moving away from “irresponsible and unlawful warfare” as “the centerpiece of America’s foreign policy”—the hallmark of the George W. Bush era—this is unfortunately, in Falk’s estimation, “far from a certainty.”
Right now, noted Falk, “the war drums are beating . . . in relation to both North Korea and Iran, and as long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy.”
Noting that “bipartisan support for maintaining the globe-girdling geopolitics runs deep in the body politic, and is accompanied by the refusal to admit the evidence of national decline,” Falk contended that “the signature irony is that the more America’s decline is met by a politics of denial, the more rapid and steep will be the decline, and the more abrupt and risky will be the necessary shrinking of the global leadership role so long played by the United States.”
Despite media and government elites continuing to defend American globalism, Falk sees some signs that grassroots Americans are waking up to the dangers and are beginning a “long-overdue” reflection on America’s role in the world.
——
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
Richard Falk: ‘Israel behind Boston bombing’
UN's Falk ties Boston bombs to Obama's Israel trip
Attaque de Boston : Falk blâme Israël
AJC urges removal of UN's Richard Falk for controversial Boston comments
Le Canada demande de démettre Richard Falk
The Boston Bombing — The Eerily Predictable Symbolism of an Age of Terror
UN official who tied Boston bombings to Israel must go, U.S. says
US calls for resignation of UN’s Richard Falk
Why is Boston ‘Terrorism’ but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?
By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do Boston
Pat Robertson, Islamophobic Televangelist, Compares ‘Evil’ Islam To Nazism (VIDEO)
Coulter: Boston suspect’s widow ‘ought to be in prison for wearing a hijab’
Americans who distrust Muslims are likelier to back the war on terror
After Boston incident, increase in America’s war against Islam
After Boston, we should put Muslims under surveillance, says Rep. King
Slain Boston bombing suspect sought copy of 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'
AP: Tamerlan Tsarnaev était « radicalisé » par la Vérité, pas par l'Islam - Les « sites extrémistes » qu'il a visités décrivent le rôle des agences de renseignements dans les attentats du 11 septembre
Ça commence avec les musulmans, mais bientôt ce sera nous.
Even after Boston, there is more anti-Jewish than anti-Muslim sentiment in U.S., says ADL's Foxman
Israeli at marathon: Miracle more weren’t killed
Boston bombing took place the same day Israel remembers those killed from terrorism
Boston bombing will boost U.S. support for Israel, says Netanyahu aide
Was Boston the terrorism Netanyahu threatened at the UN to unleash?
Israeli police chiefs head to Boston to meet with FBI
‘Israel-trained medical team responded to Boston attack’
Israeli Doctors Are Treating Boston Bombing Suspect: New Details
Israeli doctor uses lessons from intifada in Boston
Boston bomber may never speak again, Israeli doctor says
PDF DOWNLOAD - Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire By Chalmers Johnson
Wikipedia - Blowback (intelligence)
Blowback is unintended consequences of a covert operation that are suffered by the civil population of the aggressor government. To the civilians suffering the blowback of covert operations, the effect typically manifests itself as “random” acts of political violence without a discernible, direct cause; because the public—in whose name the intelligence agency acted—are ignorant of the effected secret attacks that provoked revenge (counter-attack) against them.[1]
Etymology Originally, blowback was CIA internal coinage denoting the unintended, harmful consequences—to friendly populations and military forces—when a given weapon is used beyond its purpose as intended by the party supplying it. Examples include anti-Western religious figures (e.g. Osama bin Laden) who, in due course, attack foe and sponsor; right-wing counter-revolutionaries who sell drugs to their sponsor’s civil populace (see CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking in the US); and banana republic juntas (see Salvadoran Civil War) who kill American reporters or nuns (e.g. Dorothy Kazel).[citation needed]
In formal, print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953, the CIA internal history of the US’s 1953 Iranian coup d'état, published in March 1954.[2][3]
The Piper Report 2013.04.28
The Boston Bombing — The Eerily Predictable Symbolism of an Age of Terror
UN official who tied Boston bombings to Israel must go, U.S. says
US calls for resignation of UN’s Richard Falk
Why is Boston ‘Terrorism’ but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?
By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do Boston
Pat Robertson, Islamophobic Televangelist, Compares ‘Evil’ Islam To Nazism (VIDEO)
Coulter: Boston suspect’s widow ‘ought to be in prison for wearing a hijab’
Americans who distrust Muslims are likelier to back the war on terror
After Boston incident, increase in America’s war against Islam
After Boston, we should put Muslims under surveillance, says Rep. King
Slain Boston bombing suspect sought copy of 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'
AP: Tamerlan Tsarnaev était « radicalisé » par la Vérité, pas par l'Islam - Les « sites extrémistes » qu'il a visités décrivent le rôle des agences de renseignements dans les attentats du 11 septembre
Ça commence avec les musulmans, mais bientôt ce sera nous.
Even after Boston, there is more anti-Jewish than anti-Muslim sentiment in U.S., says ADL's Foxman
Israeli at marathon: Miracle more weren’t killed
Boston bombing took place the same day Israel remembers those killed from terrorism
Boston bombing will boost U.S. support for Israel, says Netanyahu aide
Was Boston the terrorism Netanyahu threatened at the UN to unleash?
Israeli police chiefs head to Boston to meet with FBI
‘Israel-trained medical team responded to Boston attack’
Israeli Doctors Are Treating Boston Bombing Suspect: New Details
Israeli doctor uses lessons from intifada in Boston
Boston bomber may never speak again, Israeli doctor says
VIDEO - The Hatemongers Among Us
PDF DOWNLOAD - Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire By Chalmers Johnson
Wikipedia - Blowback (intelligence)
Blowback is unintended consequences of a covert operation that are suffered by the civil population of the aggressor government. To the civilians suffering the blowback of covert operations, the effect typically manifests itself as “random” acts of political violence without a discernible, direct cause; because the public—in whose name the intelligence agency acted—are ignorant of the effected secret attacks that provoked revenge (counter-attack) against them.[1]
Etymology Originally, blowback was CIA internal coinage denoting the unintended, harmful consequences—to friendly populations and military forces—when a given weapon is used beyond its purpose as intended by the party supplying it. Examples include anti-Western religious figures (e.g. Osama bin Laden) who, in due course, attack foe and sponsor; right-wing counter-revolutionaries who sell drugs to their sponsor’s civil populace (see CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking in the US); and banana republic juntas (see Salvadoran Civil War) who kill American reporters or nuns (e.g. Dorothy Kazel).[citation needed]
In formal, print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953, the CIA internal history of the US’s 1953 Iranian coup d'état, published in March 1954.[2][3]
The Piper Report 2013.04.28
The Piper Report 2013.04.21
The Ugly Truth Broadcast April 23, 2013
The Boston Massacre–On March 5, 1770, it was the British killing Americans…
On April 15, 2013, it was the Yiddish killing Americans, for the purpose of terrorizing a people back into the Islamophobic frame of mind necessary if America is to fight 100 years’ worth of wars for the benefit of the Jewish state, just as Netanyahu recently quipped.
We are joined by the one and only Michael Collins Piper.
Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
The Ugly Truth Broadcast April 20, 2013
Boston Marathon Bombing a ‘Bibi’ operation as a follow up to his threats made on the floor of the UN General Assembly in Sept.
We are joined by Dr. Hesham Tillawi of ‘Current Issues’.
Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
AFP RADIO - Date with a Debate: Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend
AFP Radio Network
Download Default player New Window Embed
Dave Gahary moderates a debate between Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend, who tackle the controversy surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event.
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at U of M Duluth, and an authority on the JFK assassination, 9/11, and Sen. Wellstone's death.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Jim is a contributor and editor at Veterans Today and hosts a radio show, "The Real Deal", M/W/F
John Friend is a writer who maintains a blog and hosts “The Realist Report.”
Operation Ouroboros: Boston suspect linked to newspaper that exposes false flag operations
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
In a front page story in today’s edition of the Wall Street Journal, the alleged Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev is linked to the populist, right wing newspaper, American Free Press, a national weekly which exposes government black ops.Strange that a terrorist would be subscribing to a newspaper that warns its readers that terrorism is too often a US government false flag operation against its own people. The report, in the August 6, 2013 Wall Street Journal, titled "Bombing Suspect Steeped in Conspiracies," brings us full circle, with the serpent consuming its own tail by pointing to its unmasking in the pages of the American Free Press -- daring us to act on the directional signal it is providing about itself -- and if we do not, then the serpent's coils are made exponentially tighter as it grips our hearts and minds.(...)
Alex Jones retracts his "Arabs own Hollywood" comment: "Hollywood is predominantly Jewish," says Alex Jones. He adds that "cointel-pro" took him out of context when he said "the Arabs own Hollywood" But it's still the Saudis!
Propagande américaine ou alexjonesienne? bonnet blanc blanc bonnet!
US: Hezbollah 'drug cartel' 24 avril 2013
Alex Jones claims hezbollah is training mexican drug cartel nov 2010
Propagande américaine ou alexjonesienne? bonnet blanc blanc bonnet!
US: Hezbollah 'drug cartel' 24 avril 2013
Alex Jones claims hezbollah is training mexican drug cartel nov 2010
According to the FBI, Jewish extremists commit more terror than Islamic extremists!
VIDEO - DHS Whistleblower Censored from 60 minutes (on spying on "terrorists")
Abe Foxman Rationalizes Blanket Spying On American Muslims
Former Fox News pundit: ‘Fox waging a campaign’ to link ‘radical’ and ‘Islam’
Fox News host: Denouncing violence against Muslims ‘could be perceived’ as offensive
VIDEO - US-Zionist media brainwashing Americans against Islam
Dutch politician Geert Wilders: ‘What we need today is Zionism for the nations of Europe’
High-Level Intriguers Behind Recent Barrage of Anti-Muslim Propaganda
Michael Collins Piper for American Free Press
Conspiracy theories about Muslims are taking hold within the patriot movement. Especially pernicious are heated claims about a “rising Muslim tide” and Muslim “sharia law” gaining a grip on the West.
While most patriots realize the official version of 9-11—that it was the work of Muslim fanatics—is a lie, many still inexplicably believe Zionist propaganda about sharia and an impending Muslim invasion.
These images are designed to inflame Americans against Muslims and make Americans all the more ready to fight wars against Iran and Syria or any Muslim country perceived to be a threat to Israel.
A little background regarding the current wave of rumors is appropriate, demonstrating precisely where these scurrilous stories first appeared. They are the latest incarnation of an insidious war-mongering mantra perpetuating the theme that a “clash of civilizations” between Muslims and the West is looming and must be fought—even if by nuclear arms.
The concept of a “clash of civilizations” was first publicly enunciated by a Jewish pro-Israel anti-Muslim propagandist, Bernard Lewis (an asset of British intelligence), in an elite academic publication, The Middle East Journal in 1956 and later in his 1964 book, The Middle East and the West. Lewis revived his theme in “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” a frequently cited article in the September 1990 Atlantic Monthly, then owned by billionaire Mortimer Zuckerman, for several years chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
However, it was Samuel Huntington, a member of the inner circle of the Rockefeller-controlled Trilateral Commission and a longtime figure at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—the New York affiliate of the Rothschild dynasty’s Royal Institute for International Affairs in London—who popularized the term “clash of civilizations.”
While most patriots realize the official version of 9-11—that it was the work of Muslim fanatics—is a lie, many still inexplicably believe Zionist propaganda about sharia and an impending Muslim invasion.
These images are designed to inflame Americans against Muslims and make Americans all the more ready to fight wars against Iran and Syria or any Muslim country perceived to be a threat to Israel.
A little background regarding the current wave of rumors is appropriate, demonstrating precisely where these scurrilous stories first appeared. They are the latest incarnation of an insidious war-mongering mantra perpetuating the theme that a “clash of civilizations” between Muslims and the West is looming and must be fought—even if by nuclear arms.
The concept of a “clash of civilizations” was first publicly enunciated by a Jewish pro-Israel anti-Muslim propagandist, Bernard Lewis (an asset of British intelligence), in an elite academic publication, The Middle East Journal in 1956 and later in his 1964 book, The Middle East and the West. Lewis revived his theme in “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” a frequently cited article in the September 1990 Atlantic Monthly, then owned by billionaire Mortimer Zuckerman, for several years chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
However, it was Samuel Huntington, a member of the inner circle of the Rockefeller-controlled Trilateral Commission and a longtime figure at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—the New York affiliate of the Rothschild dynasty’s Royal Institute for International Affairs in London—who popularized the term “clash of civilizations.”
Bernard Lewis—a Zionist agent—
first enunciated the Council on Fo-
reign Relations-Trilateral Commission
rhetoric about a “clash of civilizations.”
[NDLR: "Auteur de 30 ouvrages,
"choc des civilisations" dans son
ouvrage Les racines de la fureur
musulmane, rédigé 11 ans avant le
11 septembre."]
In a widely touted article in the summer 1993 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs, and later in a much-reviewed 1996 book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Huntington brought the “clash” into popular parlance, despite its origins in Jewish propaganda.
In 2004, in his book Who Are We?—the CFR man urged blocking certain groups—not justMuslims but also Hispanic Catholics—from coming into the United States, this in the name of “fighting terrorism and anti-Semitism,” reflecting a widespread, often cited belief by Jewish leaders, in particular, that Muslims and Hispanics are not in tune with Jewish concerns and not easily controlled politically.
These provocative rhetorical flourishes have hit home and many people are buying into the propaganda against Muslims and their alleged drive to seize power in America.
Recently, one pro-Israel voice—Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)—tried to exploit legitimate concerns about the push for gun control by claiming Americans need their guns to fight the rise of sharia in U.S. soil, a back-door way to trick Second Amendment advocates into fearing Muslims and to even be prepared to shoot them.
So, then, what about the Muslim population explosion we keep hearing about? Well, it’s not happening.
Although it’s not been widely reported, a recent study by a leading demographer, Nicholas Eberstadt, contradicts everything pro-Israeli agitators claim about the matter. And Eberstadt is no liberal advocate of multiculturalism. Instead, he’s associated with the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute.
David Ignatius—a respected journalist who often counters Israeli lobby propaganda—recently described Eberstadt’s study:
Using data for 49 Muslim-majority countries and territories, he found that fertility rates declined an average of 41 percent between 1975-80 and 2005-10, compared with a 33 percent decline for the world as a whole. Twenty-two Muslim countries and territories had fertility declines of 50 percent or more. . . . Fertility in Iran declined an astonishing 70 percent
over the 30-year period, which Eberstadt says was “one of the most rapid and pronounced fertility declines ever recorded in human history. . . .” Big cities in the Muslim world have seen especially sharp drops. . . .
In fact, said Eberstadt, “Fertility decline over the past generation has been more rapid in the Arab states than virtually anywhere else on Earth.”
None of this is new to those in the know. On Jan.27, 2011 The New York Times let its readership in on the big secret that the Muslim population was not accelerating exponentially in the United States or Europe or even around the world.
Commenting on The Future of the Global Muslim Population, a report by the PewResearch Center, the Times advised that “predictions that Europe will become a majority Muslim ‘Eurabia’ are unfounded,” pointing out that during the next 20 years the world’s Muslim population is projected to increase from 23.4 percent to 26.4 percent—hardly an explosion—and noting “such growth is not enough to create a drastic shift in the world’s religious balance.”
Pew found that Muslims in Europe, now 6 percent of the population, will grow only to 8 percent by 2030. The Times noted: “In France and Belgium, Muslims will be about 10 percent of the population in 20 years, and in Britain, 8 percent.” In the United States, within 20 years Muslims will constitute 1.7 percent of the population.
As far as the growing nationwide fear of sharia grabbing control of America, it was again The New York Times that admitted on July 31, 2011 that, in fact, a small, well-financed clique of pro-Israel intriguers were the source of the agitation.
The Times reported that David Yerushalmi, described as a “Hasidic Jew,” was the central player promoting sharia hysteria and that he had “come to exercise a striking influence over American public discourse about sharia.” The Times made it clear there was nothing “grass roots” about the new concern about sharia:
Working with a cadre of conservative public policy institutes and former military and intelligence officials, Mr. Yerushalmi has written privately financed reports, filed lawsuits against the government and drafted the model legislation that recently swept through the country—all with the effect of casting sharia as one of the greatest threats to American freedom since the Cold War.
This acknowledgement by the Times should have embarrassed those who parrot the anti-Muslim rhetoric of Yerushalmi and his collaborators, the foremost of whom is Frank Gaffney, a longtime advocate for Israel in high-level Washington circles.
Closely associated with at least four people who have been investigated by the FBI on suspicion of espionage for Israel, Gaffney was a founder of the pro-Israel Project for the New American Century, which declared a “new Pearl Harbor” could energize popular support for American military meddling around the globe. In fact, the 9-11 attacks—attributed to “the Muslims”—provided that new Pearl Harbor.
This phenomenon is not exclusive to the United States. Across Europe, a shocking number of Europeans—often called “nationalists”—are adopting anti-Muslim rhetoric and declaring Israel an ally. They include: Nick Griffin of the British National Party; Marine Le Pen of the French National Front, who says her movement is “Zionistic”; GeertWilders of the Dutch Freedom Party; and Filip Dewinter of the Belgian Vlaamas Belang Party. In September 2005, Dewinter said: “Israel is a sort of outpost for our Western society, an outpost of democracy, of freedom of speech, of protecting common values within a hostile environment.”
In truth, however, Israel has razed Christian holy sites, destroyed ancient Christian relics and instituted laws punishing Christians for proselytizing.
While refusing to acknowledge that Muslims revere Christ as a beloved prophet, Dewinter and like-minded “nationalists” ignore anti-Christian hostility that is an article of faith in Israel and documented by modern Jewish scholars in such works as Jesus in the Talmud by Dr. Peter Schafer and Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence by Dr. Elliot Horowitz.
There’s no doubt about it: Zionist propaganda against Muslims is rising in influence in the world today, despite the fact it’s founded on lies—another sign patriots need to be ever wary and on alert.
——
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in theWhite House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
In 2004, in his book Who Are We?—the CFR man urged blocking certain groups—not justMuslims but also Hispanic Catholics—from coming into the United States, this in the name of “fighting terrorism and anti-Semitism,” reflecting a widespread, often cited belief by Jewish leaders, in particular, that Muslims and Hispanics are not in tune with Jewish concerns and not easily controlled politically.
These provocative rhetorical flourishes have hit home and many people are buying into the propaganda against Muslims and their alleged drive to seize power in America.
Recently, one pro-Israel voice—Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)—tried to exploit legitimate concerns about the push for gun control by claiming Americans need their guns to fight the rise of sharia in U.S. soil, a back-door way to trick Second Amendment advocates into fearing Muslims and to even be prepared to shoot them.
So, then, what about the Muslim population explosion we keep hearing about? Well, it’s not happening.
Although it’s not been widely reported, a recent study by a leading demographer, Nicholas Eberstadt, contradicts everything pro-Israeli agitators claim about the matter. And Eberstadt is no liberal advocate of multiculturalism. Instead, he’s associated with the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute.
David Ignatius—a respected journalist who often counters Israeli lobby propaganda—recently described Eberstadt’s study:
Using data for 49 Muslim-majority countries and territories, he found that fertility rates declined an average of 41 percent between 1975-80 and 2005-10, compared with a 33 percent decline for the world as a whole. Twenty-two Muslim countries and territories had fertility declines of 50 percent or more. . . . Fertility in Iran declined an astonishing 70 percent
over the 30-year period, which Eberstadt says was “one of the most rapid and pronounced fertility declines ever recorded in human history. . . .” Big cities in the Muslim world have seen especially sharp drops. . . .
In fact, said Eberstadt, “Fertility decline over the past generation has been more rapid in the Arab states than virtually anywhere else on Earth.”
None of this is new to those in the know. On Jan.27, 2011 The New York Times let its readership in on the big secret that the Muslim population was not accelerating exponentially in the United States or Europe or even around the world.
Commenting on The Future of the Global Muslim Population, a report by the PewResearch Center, the Times advised that “predictions that Europe will become a majority Muslim ‘Eurabia’ are unfounded,” pointing out that during the next 20 years the world’s Muslim population is projected to increase from 23.4 percent to 26.4 percent—hardly an explosion—and noting “such growth is not enough to create a drastic shift in the world’s religious balance.”
Pew found that Muslims in Europe, now 6 percent of the population, will grow only to 8 percent by 2030. The Times noted: “In France and Belgium, Muslims will be about 10 percent of the population in 20 years, and in Britain, 8 percent.” In the United States, within 20 years Muslims will constitute 1.7 percent of the population.
As far as the growing nationwide fear of sharia grabbing control of America, it was again The New York Times that admitted on July 31, 2011 that, in fact, a small, well-financed clique of pro-Israel intriguers were the source of the agitation.
The Times reported that David Yerushalmi, described as a “Hasidic Jew,” was the central player promoting sharia hysteria and that he had “come to exercise a striking influence over American public discourse about sharia.” The Times made it clear there was nothing “grass roots” about the new concern about sharia:
Working with a cadre of conservative public policy institutes and former military and intelligence officials, Mr. Yerushalmi has written privately financed reports, filed lawsuits against the government and drafted the model legislation that recently swept through the country—all with the effect of casting sharia as one of the greatest threats to American freedom since the Cold War.
This acknowledgement by the Times should have embarrassed those who parrot the anti-Muslim rhetoric of Yerushalmi and his collaborators, the foremost of whom is Frank Gaffney, a longtime advocate for Israel in high-level Washington circles.
Closely associated with at least four people who have been investigated by the FBI on suspicion of espionage for Israel, Gaffney was a founder of the pro-Israel Project for the New American Century, which declared a “new Pearl Harbor” could energize popular support for American military meddling around the globe. In fact, the 9-11 attacks—attributed to “the Muslims”—provided that new Pearl Harbor.
This phenomenon is not exclusive to the United States. Across Europe, a shocking number of Europeans—often called “nationalists”—are adopting anti-Muslim rhetoric and declaring Israel an ally. They include: Nick Griffin of the British National Party; Marine Le Pen of the French National Front, who says her movement is “Zionistic”; GeertWilders of the Dutch Freedom Party; and Filip Dewinter of the Belgian Vlaamas Belang Party. In September 2005, Dewinter said: “Israel is a sort of outpost for our Western society, an outpost of democracy, of freedom of speech, of protecting common values within a hostile environment.”
In truth, however, Israel has razed Christian holy sites, destroyed ancient Christian relics and instituted laws punishing Christians for proselytizing.
While refusing to acknowledge that Muslims revere Christ as a beloved prophet, Dewinter and like-minded “nationalists” ignore anti-Christian hostility that is an article of faith in Israel and documented by modern Jewish scholars in such works as Jesus in the Talmud by Dr. Peter Schafer and Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence by Dr. Elliot Horowitz.
There’s no doubt about it: Zionist propaganda against Muslims is rising in influence in the world today, despite the fact it’s founded on lies—another sign patriots need to be ever wary and on alert.
——
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in theWhite House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
American Free Press
Internet Rife With Disinformation
• “ Cyber shills” working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers
BEHIND THE SCENES
Michael Collins Piper
Consider this: Right after 9-11, AFP correspondent Victor Thorn demonstrated that the U.S. government version of what happened to United Flight
93 on 9-11 was an absolute lie, and that the plane
was deliberately shot down by the government.
Yet, today, there is an ongoing push to flood the
Internet and independent media with a never-before-seen genre of thought that holds, essentially,
that nothing reported in the establishment press is
“for real”—that every traumatic event is, to one degree or another, a big hoax.
Here’s the problem: Had this mindset held sway
after 9-11, it would have been alleged there never
even was a United Flight 93, that it neither crashed
nor was shot down and that those who died on the
plane never existed and that their survivors (and
some of the witnesses interviewed by Thorn) were
paid actors—referred to as “crisis actors” in this new
genre—deployed to misdirect honest investigators.
The
Internet would have been rife with accusations that Thorn’s revelations
were actually part of
the cover-up and, as a consequence, many good
folks might have doubted AFP’s credibility.
Fortunately, most people see through such nonsense. However, this new
“meme” (that nothing is real) is catching hold among many who don’t
realize that ongoing efforts to impose this worldview—almost a cult-like
ideology—on truth seekers is a
very real conspiracy designed to undermine diligent reporting of the
type seen in AFP.
Unfortunately, many are falling into this carefully
crafted trap.
A bevy of
disinformation specialists
known as “cyber shills”—along with amateur keyboard detectives caught up
in the frenzy—are bombarding patriots with all manner of outlandish
“analysis” of photographs and videos, purporting to
“prove” some point that is invariably a total distraction from the real
facts that should be unveiled.
This does harm to the serious efforts of those
who are trying to expose the very real conspiracies
and cover-ups surrounding 9-11, the Oklahoma City
bombing, the JFK assassination, the Boston bombing and so many matters hidden behind the media
monopoly’s iron curtain of censorship.
Note: AFP is here to tell readers that there’s
more to the story of shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and at the Washington Navy Yard
and to the Boston Marathon bombing than many of
the Internet sensationalists are telling you.
In
truth, many still do not understand the big secret about Sandy Hook: In
the face of the predictable
media push for gun control following that tragedy,
there was an obvious conspiracy by Internet provocateurs to misdirect
patriots into thinking they were
fighting gun control by repeating stories that “no children died” when,
in fact, such claims made Second Amendment advocates look ridiculous.
Serious-minded Second Amendment advocates
were arguing, of course, that guns in the hands of
teachers and staff at Sandy Hook Elementary could have saved the lives of those who were massacred.
On April 28—at website newswithviews.com—respected patriot Devvy Kidd put it in perspective:
Over the past nearly two decades, every time some horrific “event” happens, wanna-be “journalists” come out of the woodwork with their conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing; bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank speculation. [These are] irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or to get people to their websites. They have zero credibility and hurt the rest of us by being lumped together [with us]. I have debunked conspiracy theories in the past based on documentation. I get attacked as if I’m the bad guy for pursuing the truth. There are conspiracies and cover-ups, but we want the truth, not speculation.
For years,
AFP has been smeared for publishing what critics call “conspiracy
theories,” which are, in fact, truthful reporting of high-level
misdeeds. Those trying to discredit revelations about the real
conspiracies do all they can to make AFP and others who expose those
conspiracies and the truth about mind control appear to be “nut jobs.”
That’s why, in 2008, University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein—a Barack Obama crony—issued a formal crisis management paper on “conspiracy theories,” outlining a proposed pro- gram of what he called “cognitive infiltration” to discredit such theories, particularly those implicating Israel in 9-11.
And while such “Judas goat” operations have been going on for years, involving, for example, the FBI’s infamous ADL-assisted COINTELPRO—targeting the Ku Klux Klan, the National States Rights Party, the Minutemen and other dissidents—we know of one current Internet-focused scheme exposed by Thorn in AFP. Reporting that the Israeli government pays young Israelis $2,000 a month to troll the Internet and spread disinformation, Thorn noted that this connivance is well coordinated:
That’s why, in 2008, University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein—a Barack Obama crony—issued a formal crisis management paper on “conspiracy theories,” outlining a proposed pro- gram of what he called “cognitive infiltration” to discredit such theories, particularly those implicating Israel in 9-11.
And while such “Judas goat” operations have been going on for years, involving, for example, the FBI’s infamous ADL-assisted COINTELPRO—targeting the Ku Klux Klan, the National States Rights Party, the Minutemen and other dissidents—we know of one current Internet-focused scheme exposed by Thorn in AFP. Reporting that the Israeli government pays young Israelis $2,000 a month to troll the Internet and spread disinformation, Thorn noted that this connivance is well coordinated:
Participants are provided with specific scripts to use on enemies, complete with details involving sensationalized accusations against enemies, divide-and-conquer strategies where one individual is pitted against another, plus a variety of distraction techniques and the marginalization of opinions that differ from the official Jewish party line. Other tactics include denying inconvenient facts, refusing dialogue by sending conversations off into absurd directions, or dishonestly manip- ulating sources to entrap a foe.
Programmed
to capture the imagination of sincere truth seekers, these
manipulations—aimed at a receptive “captive audience”—are intrigues
designed, as Thorn noted, to not only redirect debate by countering
conspiracy theories but also by inserting ridiculous disinformation into
the debate.
This further discredits any and all conspiracy theories—which happens to be the ultimate purpose of this multi-faceted effort.
Implementing
Sunstein’s treacherous mind-control agenda, crisis management experts
recognized that Internet-active truth seekers constitute a “crowd” as
defined by Gustave LeBon’s sinister study—The Crowd—a
legendary work described as having “exerted a powerful influence upon
the thought of men aiming to understand the workings of collective
behavior and of social psychology.”
Remembering
what LeBon said—“To know the art of impressing the imagination of
crowds is to know at the same time the art of governing them”— Sunstein
set in motion an Orwellian framework for both mind control and crowd
control all too visible on the Internet today.
AFP
pledges to ignore their disinformation and focus on the big picture and
continue to confront the real issues with facts, not speculation.
—— Michael Collins Piper
is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken
in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
United States Internal Revenue Service reverses its revocation more than a year after ZOA failure to file financial disclosures.
This Nov. 20, 2011 file photo
shows TV and radio commentator Glenn Beck at the 114th Anniversary
Justice Louis Brandeis award Dinner given by the Zionist Organization of
America in New York.
À propos de ces conspirationnistes qui ont l'oeil rivé sur des détails techniques et autres diversions:
While the researchers have preoccupied themselves with how the assassination was accomplished, there has been almost no systematic thinking on why President Kennedy was killed."
--Vincent J. Salandria, Attorney Philadelphia, Pa. Based on an address at the conference of the New
England Branch of the Women's International League for Peace and
Freedom, Cambridge,
Mass., Oct. 23, 1971.) http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/16th_issue/vs1.html
À propos du conspirationnisme nuisible, qui évite de trop insister sur
l'identité des commanditaires du crime, en focalisant par exemple sur
des détails techniques (appelés "incohérences de la version
officielle"), se propageant partout et très rapidement sur le Net,
polluant, intoxiquant le mouvement de vérité. C'est comme ça que les
contrôleurs de l'info peuvent continuer à contrôler l'info à
l'intérieur du mouvement de vérité et ce, tout en faisant passer le
mouvement de vérité pour des gens crédules et stupides (ex: théorie des
"acteurs de crise" à Boston et Sandy Hook, théorie "aucun avion au WTC"), voire même potentiellement dangereux (ex: Tsarnaev-Boston,
etc.), ça ils adorent! Les vrais "acteurs de crise" dans cette
histoire, ce sont les professionnels en gestion de crise et en
ingénierie sociale qui ont lancé ces rumeurs-intox telles que ces
théories sur les "acteurs de crise" à Boston et Sandy Hook, afin de
porter atteinte à la crédibilité mouvement de vérité...
The Piper Report Aug 26, 2013
The sloppy ‘research’ done by so many in the ‘truth movement’ and how it is utilized by our enemies against us.
FLASHBACK: Jonathan Kay: Bringing paranoia to the digital masses
Book Excerpt: Among the Truthers by Jonathan Kay
The sloppy ‘research’ done by so many in the ‘truth movement’ and how it is utilized by our enemies against us.
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
FLASHBACK: Jonathan Kay: Bringing paranoia to the digital masses
Book Excerpt: Among the Truthers by Jonathan Kay
"All of the tiny little islands of paranoia suddenly were linked up by virtual causeways. One result is that elaborate conspiracy theories now can be cobbled together literally overnight through the efforts of hundreds of scattered dilettante conspiracists. Another result is that conspiracists all around the world now tend to focus on the same few dozen talking points that figure prominently on the top websites.
The Internet has produced a radical democratization of the
conspiracist marketplace of ideas. No longer does one have to spend
years researching and writing a book to attract attention: One can
simply set up a blog, or chime in on someone else’s, with some
refinement of the existing collective lore. In fact, today’s
conspiracists don’t even have to read books — they can pick up all their
talking points from Truther websites, or, better yet, from Truther
propaganda videos. (...)
This dumbing-down effect explains the downward shift in the age profile of conspiracists: While influential JFK conspiracy theorists tended to be bookish middle-aged eccentrics, many of the Internet’s noisiest Truthers are barely old enough to shave: Conspiracism is something they fit in between video gaming and Facebook surfing.
This dumbing-down effect explains the downward shift in the age profile of conspiracists: While influential JFK conspiracy theorists tended to be bookish middle-aged eccentrics, many of the Internet’s noisiest Truthers are barely old enough to shave: Conspiracism is something they fit in between video gaming and Facebook surfing.
--Excerpt from Among the Truthers by Jonathan Kay © 2011.
Published in Canada by HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
"As this positive social feedback becomes addictive, the conspiracist's
network of enablers grows often to such a point that it crowds out the
conspiracy theorist's nonbelieving friends. The process resembles the
formation of an electronic cocoon that envelops a conspiracist with codependents."
-"Among the Truthers", Jonathan Kay
À propos du 9/11 et d'Israël:
Et ce sera l'homme blanc européen chrétien qui sera tenu responsable,
sûrement pas les juifs qui nous aurons tous menés à la catastrophe!
"Si demain, un Breivik « français de souche », nourri des textes antisémites ultra-catholiques ou néo-païens énumérés ci-dessus, se prend pour le sauveur de la civilisation blanche et/ou chrétienne et fait un carnage, il ne faudra pas dire que nous ne savions pas." (Tarek Sandal, du site de repères antiracistes)
À propos du 9/11 et d'Israël:
"THE 9/11 EFFECT
If the Holocaust and the
creation of the Jewish state jointly marked the first great turning
point in the modern history of Anti-Semitism, 9/11 marked the second. Following
the attacks, supporters of Israel spoke of a silver lining: The war
against militant Islam suddenly was a global one. Now, the whole world
would see and understand the sort of nihilistic hatred that Israelis
confronted everyday."
"America's fight became Israel's fight. Over the
last decade, a period during which Republicans and Democrats have fought
over every other subject imaginable, support for Israel has remained
one of the few issues to attract virtually unanimous bipartisan
support."
"Among warhawks on the Right in particular, the sudden identification of militant Islam as America's greatest enemy cast a startling transformation in the perception of the American Jewish community. Whereas Jews might once have treathened the American Right in their roles as Communists, Anarchists, Trade Unioners, Civil Rights leaders and Ivy League intellectuals, no Jew could ever be an islamist. Just the opposite: the Jew was the perfect anti-Islamist, whose zeal and reliability in the war on terrorism was hard-wired into his political DNA, thanks to six decades of israeli warfare against islamic terrorists in the Middle East. For the first time in the history of western civilisation, the Jews' 'foreignness' and mixed-loyalties -- to the United States, Israel and world Jewry -- became a source of respect and trust rather than suspicion."
"The September 11th attacks changed America in a thousand different ways. Perhaps the most ironic, given the terrorists' intensely Anti-Semitic ideology, was that it cemented the long process leading to the Jews' full-fledged ascension into the America establishment. "
"Among warhawks on the Right in particular, the sudden identification of militant Islam as America's greatest enemy cast a startling transformation in the perception of the American Jewish community. Whereas Jews might once have treathened the American Right in their roles as Communists, Anarchists, Trade Unioners, Civil Rights leaders and Ivy League intellectuals, no Jew could ever be an islamist. Just the opposite: the Jew was the perfect anti-Islamist, whose zeal and reliability in the war on terrorism was hard-wired into his political DNA, thanks to six decades of israeli warfare against islamic terrorists in the Middle East. For the first time in the history of western civilisation, the Jews' 'foreignness' and mixed-loyalties -- to the United States, Israel and world Jewry -- became a source of respect and trust rather than suspicion."
"The September 11th attacks changed America in a thousand different ways. Perhaps the most ironic, given the terrorists' intensely Anti-Semitic ideology, was that it cemented the long process leading to the Jews' full-fledged ascension into the America establishment. "
-- "Among the Truthers", Jonathan Kay
Michael Collins Piper, False Flags--Template for Terror:
CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE . . .
The Crisis Management Conspiracy:
The Extraordinary Untold Story of the Orwellian
Experiments in False Flag Crowd Psychology
Carried Out at Sandy Hook and Boston
_This is guaranteed: You are about to be confronted with some harsh realities that may be unlike you’ve ever encountered in whatever you’ve heard about what happened at Sandy Hook school on Dec. 14 2012 and at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.
_If you will be personally offended by expressions of fact and opinion (based on fact) that may contradict your deepest-felt beliefs regarding Sandy Hook and Boston, then please read no further.
_We’ll say it right now—and this will certainly astound you: Forget everything—everything—you’ve heard in both the mainstream media and in the “alternative” media about Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Then, after you’ve studied—if you dare—the material we are about to explore, you’ll realize what really happened at Sandy Hook and Boston is something unlike anything—and so very much bigger— than even you might have imagined.
_You’ll never look at Sandy Hook and Boston in the same way again. But you will be prepared for whatever future “crisis” the high-level conspirators undoubtedly have planned for America.
_As such, when that crisis happens, you’ll be better able to see through the fog of disinformation that will be once again unleashed— and rest assured that it will be.
In the wake of Sandy Hook and Boston, much was heard in the “alternative”media about “Crisis Actors” who played a part in misdirecting people’s attention as to the real facts about what happened during those “false flag” events.
_And false flag events they were. Both of those tragedies were classic false flag operations, but the truth is that they were not precisely the kind of false flag of the type that we saw carried out in the JFK assassination, in the Oklahoma City bombing, and later in 9-11.
_In fact, as we’ll see here—and this is the first time ever the story has been told in its entirety—the real “Crisis Actors” were not those whom many people believed them to be.
_And that is a story in and of itself.
_And it will surprise you.
_The story is much bigger than anyone might have conceived and it points toward the venal nature of a carefully-crafted high-level conspiracy that bears all the ear-marks of the manipulative masters of mind control whose not-so-fine (and ugly) hand was so clearly on the levels of power in the murder of JFK and those mass murders that followed in Oklahoma City and with the 9-11 terrorist tragedy.
_The vast flow of dissident information that erupted following the events of 9-11 made it an absolute“must” for the Mossad and its allies in intrigue to prevent it from ever happening again.
_You see, this is old-fashioned “crisis management” at its best (or worst).But the“crisis” in question—as you might naturally think—is not the death of the president or the lives lost in Oklahoma City or on 9-11.
_Rather, the crisis—in the minds of the conspirators responsible—is the potential danger to their power that could erupt if enough people came, for example, to conclude that the Mossad was indeed responsible for any of these false flag terrorist attacks on American soil.
_Therefore—in the wake of 9-11 and the Internet frenzy that took place with the rise of fast-moving and widely-distributed conspiracy theories (many implicating the Mossad)—it is now clear a conscious decision was made to ensure that, in the future, when any event of a conspiratorial nature occurred (particularly one involving the Mossad) that those most inclined toward acceptance of conspiracy theories would be corralled and misdirected through the most effective means possible.
_However, to achieve this end, it would be necessary to determine the best way to chart the rise and course of conspiracy theories; to pinpoint precisely who is most susceptible toward believing in them and, naturally, to do all that could be done to discredit them.
_But the plan—as we shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it was a stroke of genius).
_The intriguers effectively determined that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes). That is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to the mix.
_The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility.
_In the past, people did have doubts about the official stories relating to the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 tragedy. Now, however, emerging alternative theories about other events would be totally eviscerated—from within—and die by their own accord.Anyone putting forth any form of conspiracy theory would automatically become suspect, their very sanity questioned.
_The multiple stream of Internet provocations that captured the imagination of the “patriot” and“alternative” media following the Sandy Hook affair and the events in Boston were—beyond any question—the work of high-level conspirators whose designs were clear:
_1) To monitor the reaction of known (and potential) political dissidents to public events of a “crisis” nature;
_2) To gauge the level of conspiracy theorizing (and the acceptance of the theories) following such events;
_3) To trace the origins of conspiracy theories and to chart their course via Internet websites, email and other social media venues;
_4) To disrupt and misdirect conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theories whose views were deemed in some way problematic;
_and 5) To have in place a fully-functioning Crisis Management System—a very real “conspiracy”—that could be utilized to its fullest capacity at some future time.
_The first public hint of what was openly-acknowledged high-level intrigue of this sort—designed to undermine the 9-11 truth movement (not to mention any and all suggestions of conspiracies in other realms) was formally unveiled on January 15, 2008.
_At that time, one Cass Sunstein, a professor at the University of Chicago, and his co-author, Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule, put forth a so-called “preliminary draft” of what was officially issued as “Harvard Public LawWorking Paper No.08-03 and University of Chicago Public LawWorking Paper No. 199.”
_Although little-noticed at the time it was first issued, the “working paper” came under broad-ranging public inspection (widely discussed on the Internet) after Sunstein was drafted in 2009 by President Barack Obama to serve as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a post Sunstein departed in 2012.
_Later published under other auspices under the title “Conspiracy Theories,” the paper addressed the specific question of how the government should respond to conspiracy theories that were now holding wide sway (particularly on the Internet) and, in no uncertain terms, addressed what Sunstein (who is Jewish) considered the specific danger of the growing belief that Israel had played a part in 9-11.
_Naturally, 9-11 truthers were outraged by this paper and noted (rightly so) that the co-author was now effectively “minister of information” for the Obama regime: A U.S. government official was actually pondering, in writing,how government power could be used to deal with conspiracy theories and those who believed in them!
_Sunstein’s insidious and Orwellian “think piece” began by raising this question:
_Should governmental responses be addressed to the suppliers [of conspiracy theories] with a view to persuading or silencing them, or rather be addressed to the mass audience, with a view to innoculating them from pernicious theories?_While noting that, in his view,“these two strategies are not mutually exclusive,” Sunstein went on to suggest that “perhaps the best approach is to straddle the two audiences with a single response or simply to provide multiple responses.”
_However, Sunstein said,many officials considered it “an exercise in futility” to try to respond directly to “the suppliers of conspiracy theories” and that, instead, they tried to “address their responses to the third-party mass audience, hoping to stem the spread of conspiracy theories by dampening the demand rather than by reducing the supply.”
_In answer to his own question“What can the government do about conspiracy theories?” Sunstein provided five possibilities:
_(1) Government might ban “conspiracy theories,” somehow defined._Noting that each of these proposals had “a distinct set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each [of which] will have a place under imaginable conditions,” Sunstein answered the specific question of “What should government do?” by stating quite directly:
_(2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
_(3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.
_(4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.
_(5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.
_Our main policy claim here is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of [the aforementioned proposals:] (3), (4), and (5)._Clearly, Sunstein recognized that—at least under the First Amendment as it exists today—the government could not ban conspiracy theories outright or levy some sort of tax on those who purvey such theories that he and others find offensive.
_However, Sunstein concluded, the government could engage in efforts to counter the theories by recruiting“credible private parties” to combat conspiracy theoriests and by engaging in “information communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.”
_And this framework, in itself, is already in place. It is a very dirty and ugly history indeed, demonstrated by the long-standing collaboration between such groups as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center (not to mention the American Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Committee) working with the CIA and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, as well as Israel’s Mossad—and, dare we add, British intelligence—in concerted efforts to undermine American political dissidents.
_Working from this standpoint Sunstein outlined what he called “a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories.” This program, he said, involved the following:
_[C]ognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity._Because, Sunstein said,“conspiracy theorists are likely to approach evidence and arguments in a biased way, they are not likely to respond well, or even logically, to the claims of [people they know to be] public officials,” it was vital that, as Sunstein said,“government officials would participate anonymously or even with false identities” in 9-11 discussion groups and other conspiracy-focused gatherings on the Internet and elsewhere.
_And with the increasingly widespread knowledge we now have about the capacity of the National Security Agency—among many government intelligence agencies in the United States alone—to monitor the telephone calls, emails, and other Internet activity of all Americans,we can certainly say, with utmost authority, that Sunstein and his co-conspirators and like-minded intriguers had already concluded that the framework was in place to be able to see precisely who was engaged in conspiracy talk and with whom they were communicating.
_It is thus no coincidence that when the series of scandals erupted over the summer of 2013 regarding the activities of the National Security Agency (NSA) that Cass Sunstein was one of the four members of the so-called “independent” panel appointed by President Barack Obama charged with the responsibility of “reviewing” the operations of the NSA and other government agencies.
_And nor,we might add, it is any coincidence that another member of the panel, Richard Clarke (a former high ranking advisor to presidents—Democratic and Republican alike—in the realm of“national security”) now happens to head a private firm known as Good Harbor Security Risk Management.
_And yes, as you might have guessed, Good Harbor touts “Crisis Management” as one of its specialities.
_Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.
_The concept of “Crisis Management” is the new “big thing” in our modern era.And don’t forget—as we mentioned in Chapter Eighteen— that former high-ranking FBI official Neil Herman who was involved in much of the intrigues surrounding 9-11 (and who later worked as director of “fact-finding” for Israel’s American intelligence arm, the Anti- Defamation League) went on to become part of the “crisis management team” at Burson-Marstellar, one of the premier firms in that field today.
_In fact, two popular television dramas of recent date have Crisis Management specialists at the core of their storyline—“Scandal,” portraying the day-to-day workings of a beautiful African-American Crisis Management operative in Washington, D.C. and “The Good Wife,” featuring a particularly wily Crisis Management specialist (portrayed as a distinctly Jewish figure with the name of“Eli Gold”) who carries on his intrigues in Cass Sunstein’s home base of Chicago, no less.
_Both programs are quite revealing and say much about the nature of Crisis Management methods of operation.
_Several episodes of “The Good Wife” noted the use of “cyber shills” whose duty it is to infiltrate the Internet and place false stories and provocations designed to promote some particular agenda—or disrupt someone else’s.
_A simple Internet search of the term “Crisis Management”—and the term does deserve to be capitalized as we have rendered it here— demonstrates how foremost these new techniques of “public relations” (that is, propaganda) really are in the minds of those in high places.
_As we said: “Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.”
_So it was that—with the nature of Internet communication as it exists today and with the capacity to be able to monitor any and all content circulating on the Internet—Cass Sunstein and company had the means to construct and carry out a rather simple (but 21st Century-style technologically-sophisticated) exercise in Crisis Management planning which incorporated rather skillful experimentation with that new technology in implementing good old-fashioned Crowd Control.
And when we talk about Crowd Control,we’re not talking about the use of fire hoses and police dogs and stun guns. Rather, in fact, what we’re talking about is really just a highly-advanced form of “Mind Control”—one designed to influence a large number of people over an extended period of time through covert and quite insidious manipulation of the media—and that does include the Internet and the “alternative” and “independent” media as well. Unfortunately, a brief digression into the topic of Mind Control is relevant and important here, for it relates directly to the nature of the manipulative experiments in False Flag Crowd Control that were central to the Internet frenzy following both Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Long part of the intrigues of the high-level conspirators—best exemplified in the CIA’s infamous MK-ULTRA experiments in Mind Control, the initial stages of which were launched in the days following the CIA’s founding in 1947—this realm has not only been a province of the CIA, but also that of the Soviet KGB and Israel’s Mossad and other intelligence agencies (both public and private)—as well.
_Now, unfortunately, although the concept of Mind Control is best known among truth-seekers as a consequence of the widespread distribution of such works as Cathy O’Brien’s rather dubious book Trance-Formation of America, the truth is that there has always been available a wide variety of responsible material on the subject, in particular the book by former State Department foreign service officer John D. Marks entitled The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.
_Subtitled “The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to Control Human Behavior,” Marks’ book was based on some 16,000 pages of documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act following the public revelations regarding CIA adventures in this bizarre field that were unveiled in the wake of a controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA. Until then, Americans believed that only “the Communists” and “the Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant experiments to manipulate human behavior.
_(The title of Marks’non-fiction book was inspired by the 1958 novel by Richard Condon—later a popular motion picture—entitled The Manchurian Candidate. In that horrifying story, an American soldier is brainwashed by the communists during the KoreanWar, falsely set up as a “war hero” to be revered by the American public, and later manipulated in an assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
_(It turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known “anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting communism.
_The mind-control victim never knows he is being manipulated— until it is too late.) So—all of that having been said—Mind Control is very real and can be carried out in a variety of ways.And Crowd Control—which is a part of Crisis Management—is a form of Mind Control. And you may rest assured that those who have in interest in these matters have studied these concepts carefully and know precisely how they work.
_And—as we have seen—with high-level forces having witnessed the growth of “conspiracy theories”which these would be masters of the universe realize endanger their power—particularly with the rise of the Internet as a somewhat “independent”means of communication— the need to combat those conspiracy theories (and to control the Internet) has become a major concern.
_These very real conspirators—people of the likes of the aforementioned Cass Sunstein,who actually laid out a plan for undermining conspiracy theories—determined the best way to facilitate their operation was to orchestrate (or take advantage of) an event that would grip the public imagination and then manipulate it for their own purposes.
_Their goal was to have in place a carefully-structured network that, in the future,could be used in a much-bigger fashion to direct or—as the case may be—to misdirect public opinion (particularly in the realm of those open to “conspiracy theories”) and ensure that the trade of information regarding such events was carefully controlled.
_Here, essentially,was the plan: These conspirators needed a “crisis”—a reasonably small and manageable event they could monitor and manipulate from the very beginning, finding out, essentially,“who’s in touch with whom” and by what means and venues conspiracy theories (relating to such a crisis) gained their most widespread circulation.
_Whether the crisis was “real”—that is, of its own making, one that happened on its own—or whether it was manufactured (through covert means by some clandestine agency) didn’t matter.
_What mattered was the capacity to track (and, more importantly, to direct) public reaction to the crisis (particularly in the realm of “conspiracy theories”) and to manage the crisis to such a degree that any and all conspiracy theories relating to that crisis could be made to look foolish.
_And here’s the critical point to remember: These conspirators also realized that they could effectively redirect public debate not just by countering conspiracy theories but by actively inserting their own downright silly and ridiculous disinformation into the debate with the aim of discrediting any and all conspiracy theories.
_Worthy of the greatest thinkers of theTalmud, it was right out of the legendary Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And it was programmed—from the start—to capture the imagination of (and control) the minds of sincere patriots who were already inclined (quite naturally) to buy into conspiracy theories!
_Fully versed in the legendary sociological study of crowd behavior laid down in 1895 by Gustave Lebon in The Crowd—a volume described as having “exerted a powerful influence upon the thought of men aiming to understand the workings of collective behavior and of social psychology”—Sunstein and company set in motion a scheme that can only be described as brilliant, if not just simply as evil.
_To those who understand Sunstein’s proposition on the deeper level of Mind Control that it represents and who have likewise taken the time to carefully study the bigger picture in retrospect, it is all too apparent that the Internet-based frenzy following the Sandy Hook affair was clearly the work of the Sunstein crowd—we’ll call them the Crisis Management Conspirators—who remembered all too well what Gustave LeBon had said when he wrote so succinctly:“To know the art of impressing the imagination of crowds is to know at the same time the art of governing them.”
_The Sandy Hook affair was tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control, inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no less.
_The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
_And, quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
_And naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook.
_Now some of the errors were eventually corrected,but many of the errors were simply ignored or otherwise lost in the shuffle, and this led to further suspicions on the part of those who sensed that there was more to Sandy Hook than was officially being reported.
_(Unfortunately, although some of the errors were indeed later corrected,many so-called “conspiracy theorists” never became aware of those corrections and continued—even to this day—to cite those
“errors” as evidence of a cover-up.
_(And that’s another reason conspiracy theorists must be detail-oriented, for if they can be disproven in one minor area, those who are eager to dismiss their theories will use that one mistake as “evidence” that the bigger picture—the more broad-ranging so-called “conspiracy theory”—is, in and of itself, totally wrong.)
_But note this:
_Considering the fact Sunstein and his like-minded conspirators do have high-level connections to the controllers of the big media, it’s likely some media elements deliberately purveyed incomplete or imprecise stories about Sandy Hook, knowing full well that alert readers and audiences would detect these errors and that they would be bandied about as “proof” of a conspiracy, further muddying the waters.And that, in fact, is what happened in many instances.
_However, as we shall see, there is strong evidence to suggest that at least some “inside” elements in the mass media did play a key role in “leaking” material that was used by the Sunstein group to distract truth seekers in the wake of Sandy Hook. More about that later.
_But aside from the mis-reporting in the major media (whether deliberate or otherwise) it was almost exclusively on the Internet—via the so-called “truther” and “alternative” and “independent” websites, discussion groups, along with email and the popular video forum, YouTube, etc—that a wide variety of absolutely baseless (and largely nonsensical) stories about Sandy Hook began to appear.
_This was clearly the work of a small but skilled team of operatives working for Sunstein and company.
_As Sunstein had suggested in his now-infamous working paper, their purpose was to manipulate—and ultimately refute—and make fools of—sincere truth seekers and so-called “conspiracy theorists.”
_And, even more so, Sunstein’s goal was to convince the broad range of the American public that anyone who spoke about any conspiracies at high levels was just simply not someone to be believed.
_One of the first and most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oftrepeated theme that“Sandy Hook was a hoax”and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that was a frequently repeated allegation.)
_Even the introduction of the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited.
_And—just as Sunstein and company expected (and desired)—other individuals discussing other matters involving conspiracies (the 9-11 cover-up, the Oklahoma bombing, the JFK assassination, and even the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty) were themselves being subjected to sarcastic comments such as,“I suppose you’re also one of those people who doesn’t believe those 20 little children were killed at Sandy Hook.”
_Sunstein and company had scored big.
_They knew they literally had a proverbial “captive audience” that was unwittingly receptive to their manipulations. And they had the capacity to track—via the Internet—the entirety of the exchange of information going on.
_This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams.
_Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators implementing his plan recognized that the diverse assortment of groups active in political dissent —whether they call themselves “patriots” or “nationalists” or “truth seekers” or “white separatists” (the list of such largely selfimposed labels could go on and on)—constituted the definition of a “crowd” as laid forth in the aforementioned Gustave LeBon’s rather sinister analysis of the manner in which a “crowd” can be manipulated.
_In its ordinary sense the word "crowd" means a gathering of individuals of whatever nationality, profession, or sex, and whatever be the chances that have brought them together._In other words, these proverbial “mad scientists”—these modernday Crisis Management Conspirators, steeped in the teachings of LeBon—saw that conspiracy theories tended to form (and initially circulate) within a“crowd”of like-minded individuals and that, from that standpoint alone, such a crowd was easily manipulated. It was, after all, the High Priest of Crowd Control, Le Bon himself,who pointed out that:
_From the psychological point of view, the expression "crowd" assumes quite a different signification. . . .
_The sentiments and ideas of all the persons in the gathering take one and the same direction, and their conscious personality vanishes. A collective mind is formed, doubtless transitory, but presenting very clearly defined characteristics.
_The gathering has thus become . . . an organized crowd, or, if the term is considered preferable, a psychological crowd. It forms a single being, and is subjected to the law of the mental unity of crowds.
_However indifferent it may be supposed, a crowd, as a rule, is in a state of expectant attention, which renders suggestion easy. The first suggestion formulated which arises implants itself immediately by a process of contagion in the brains of all assembled, and the identical bent of the sentiments of the crowd is immediately an accomplished fact._That is, once a particular “theory”—some particular thought, some particular “factoid” (as they now call it)—has been inserted into a likeminded crowd, that factoid (even if, per chance, it doesn’t happen to be true) almost becomes an article of faith or even, as Le Bon said, “immediately an accomplished fact.”
_As such, the Le Bonian Mind Control masterminds recognized that precisely because a “crowd” tends, thus, to think alike, and accept all precepts that “sound good” or which seem parallel to their particular mindset, that a “crowd” would immediately incorporate by “process of contagion” any idea inserted into the mass thinking of the crowd.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators knew that once a “crowd” had become conditioned to “think alike” (so to speak) and was thereby easily subject to the power of suggestion, that such a like-minded group would immediately start to develop its own particular mindset a way of looking at some issue or event.
_As Le Bon pointed out:
_The simplest event that comes under the observation of a crowd is soon totally transformed._Essentially, because so many people in “The Crowd”—that is, the “truth movement”—saw (quite clearly) that the mass media was attempting to stoke up demands for increased gun control measures (even outright gun confiscation on a national scale), the whole image of Sandy Hook changed in its entirety.
_A crowd thinks in images, and the image itself immediately calls up a series of other images, having no logical connection with the first. We can easily conceive this state by thinking of the fantastic succession of ideas to which we are sometimes led by calling up in our minds any fact.
_Our reason shows us the incoherence there is in these images, but a crowd is almost blind to this truth, and confuses with the real event what the deforming action of its imagination has superimposed thereon.
_A crowd scarcely distinguishes between the subjective and the objective. It accepts as real the images evoked in its mind,though they most often have only a very distant relation with the observed fact.
_In fact, this was the REAL “false flag” in the whole Sandy Hook debate, but many good patriots didn’t see what was happening.
_Rather than focusing on the genuine issue of specific concern—the push for gun control—“The Crowd” was instead gettting bogged down and looking in the wrong direction, worrying about a variety of unimportant details and making allegations about Sandy Hook—that no children had actually died, for example—that made honest critics of gun control look foolish, if not downright venal.
_Most people among the general public more or less accepted the idea that a disturbed young man had committed a horrible deed and that—predictably—gun control advocates once again jumped on the tragedy in order to pursue their anti-gun agenda.
_A lot of people—including a lot of people in the “truth movement”—had previously (and rightly) expressed concerns that many of the people involved in previous mass shootings had been under the influence of psychiatric drugs which have been pushed by the major media to the great profit of the pharmeceutical conglomerates.
_And at the outset, even most skeptics of the official version of events had no doubt buying the possibility that the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza,had been the victim of MK-ULTRA style mind control,brainwashed into committing a mass shooting in order to help stampede public support for gun control or outright gun confiscation.
_Over the years more than a few independent journalists had compiled an assembly of data on a number of mass shootings in the U.S. and elsewhere suggesting there was much more to the story behind these shootings; that, in fact, they were orchestrated by behind-the-scenes forces and that there was evidence of “mind control” involved.
_So there were a lot of good reasons for many to at least suspect that perhaps there was some sort of Mind Control or other form of high-level intrigue involved in the Sandy Hook shooting.
_In fact—up until Sandy Hook—this explanation (that Lanza was a mind-controlled false flag patsy who actually killed little chiildren) would have sufficed for even the most hard-core skeptic who doubted the official version of events laid down by the authorities.
_But with Sandy Hook—and the intervention of the Crisis Management Conspirators—the outlook of the“average”grass-roots conspiracy theorist in “The Crowd” would never be the same again.
_As a consequence of the intrigues of the Crisis Management Conspirators, the mindset of the conspiracy theorists would be drastically altered to the point that many good people were pushed into the direction of believing that absolutely nothing—absolutely nothing— could ever be believed and that everything—absolutely everything— was a horrendous lie.
_And we are not talking just about Sandy Hook.We are talking about virtually anything—everything—taking place in our world today.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators were pushing honest truth seekers in“The Crowd” into a proverbial padded cell where they could just keep screaming at the top of their voices and banging their heads against the wall with the ultimate realization that nobody was paying any attention to them whatsoever—a virtual Twilight Zone.
_Nonetheless—on a parallel basis—the Crisis Management Conspirators,quite naturally,didn’t want anyone in the general public, at least, to ever consider the possibility that there had been any Mind Manipulation or any conspiracy to stage a“crisis”—such as another mass shooting—to justify gun confiscation.
_Therefore, they began spinning bizarre tales and inserting them onto the Internet and into the mind of “The Crowd”—that is, patriots and other skeptics of the official story—in order to muddy up serious inquiry and discussion.
_They dazzled “The Crowd”with an array of colorful and interesting and fiendishly clever (if not obviously outrageous) rumors that absolutely had the immediate and profound (and very much intended) effect of directing public ire upon those good patriots—the so-called “conspiracy theorists”—who were rightly concerned about behind-thescenes manipulation that accompanied the events at Sandy Hook.
_Soon enough—and not surprisingly—people in the general public began to think any conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook were absolutely beyond the pale and that people inclined toward conspiracy theories questioning the official government line were crazy troublemakers who belonged in mental hospitals!
_The Crisis Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute the latest Sandy Hook “revelations.”
_And, of course, this—as we shall see in a moment—was all keeping in line with another aspect of the “crowd” that the “guru” of the Crisis Management Conspirators—Gustave LeBon—had already assessed.
People were falling victim to the the fact that because something is repeated time and again, it gains a certain credibility in the mind of the ‘crowd.” LeBon wrote:
_The influence of repetition on crowds is comprehensible when the power is seen which it exercises on the most enlightened minds._Precisely because so much disinformation was being repeated by well-meaning and entirely innocent folks, a lot of good patriots concluded that something had to be amiss with the “official” Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they said—so many good patriots on so many websites and elsewhere wouldn’t be raising these questions. However—and this is a point that many failed to consider at the time (but which many patriots are now coming to realize):
_This power is due to the fact that the repeated statement is embedded in the long run in those profound regions of our unconscious selves in which the motives of our actions are forged.
_At the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.
_When an affirmation has been sufficiently repeated and there is unanimity in this repetition . . .what is called a current of opinion is formed and the powerful mechanism of contagion intervenes.
_The truth is that a vast majority of the Sandy Hook spin came from theretofore unknown sources—who to this day still remain largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames—who helped put out much of the material in the first place, adding often-dubious commentary that helped stir up suspicion in the first place.
_As LeBon had so rightly said, “at the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.” How true it was with Sandy Hook!
_These Internet sources who had suddenly popped up had no reputation (either good or bad) among traditional patriots and conspiracy theorists—but their impact was immeasurable.
_And they were ably aided and abetted by some longtime deep-cover assets—agents provocateurs—inside the patriot movement who helped give further “credibility” to these stories being cranked out by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_A lot of old CIA hands and federal informants---veterans of the black propaganda journal Media Bypass (referenced in Chapter Fourteen) that had been heavily funded and set up in time for the disinformation surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing----popped up to help disseminate a lot of the Sandy Hook-related nonsense that gripped the imagination of the patriots.
_Meanwhile, on a daily basis, the powers-that-be in control of the mass media were cranking up a continuing round-the-clock campaign in favor of gun control,pointing at Sandy Hook as underscoring the necessity for dismantling the Second Amendment. It was, they said, “for the children.” Americans were told they needed to give up their guns so as to prevent future tragedies of this kind.
_But the irony is that many good people who thought that by“exposing the Sandy Hook fraud”—that is, passing on the Internet-based rumors about Sandy Hook—that they were “doing something” to stop the drive for gun control. In fact, it was a total misdirection from the central issue of gun control. Peoples’energies were being focused not on gun control but on the “necessity” to “spread the truth about Sandy Hook.”
_And that, as we’ve said,was the real“false flag” in Sandy Hook. However,unfortunately, the patriots who were repeating the Internet rumors were giving a whole new twist to the controversy surrounding Sandy Hook and the push for gun control that came in its wake.
_What was happening was that the more the conspiracy theories surrounding Sandy Hook got all the more fantastic, the more it had the effect of discrediting all sincere critics of gun control who were being identified with “those people who say that no children really died at Sandy Hook.” The bottom line matter of fighting the drive for gun control was sidelined by “The Crowd” which had become caught up in discussing (and perpetuating) all of the silly Sandy Hook rumors that the Crisis Management Conspirators had unleashed on the Internet.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators—having a field day (and a good laugh) at their success in re-shaping the thinking of conspiracyconscious patriots—knew full well of another key concept put forth by LeBon: The fact that a “crowd” can accept the most ridiculous propositions, ones that an individual—prior to becoming a member of the “crowd”—would not be so ready to incorporate into his thinking. if given the time to consider the matter more fully.
_More and more a fabulously colorful bazaar of bizarre conspiracy theories began to swirl around Sandy Hook. Many of these theories— often promulgated as part of a grab-bag package by their promoters— were directly contradictory.
_Here’s an example.
_One big name figured out that Israel’s Mossad was behind the shooting. His proof? Well, everybody knows that the Mossad is murderous and that Israel has no problem killing children.
_This authority claims a three-man Mossad team pulled off the job— but then again, there are folks who say this investigator is dead wrong (pun intended) since, of course, nobody was killed at Sandy Hook at all, or least not enough people killed to justify a big-time Mossad operation of the kind described by that analyst.
_However, as far as the Mossad is concerned (vis-a-vis Sandy Hook) there were two different claims in this regard. Some said the Mossad did it to hurt President Obama, getting revenge against the president for not being pro-Israel enough. Others said the Mossad did it to help the president further along the conspiracy to grab America’s guns.
_In other words, if you think the Mossad did it, you have two entirely different (and quite contradictory) motives to choose from. And so, depending on what you think of Barack Obama, you have two different versions of the story that “The Mossad Was Behind Sandy Hook.”
_But the foundation of this theory—which is certainly delectable to anyone who has professed belief of Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and in 9-11—doesn’t have any basis in any given facts, the exciting scenario itself notwithstanding.
_Yet—believe it or not—after I publicly discounted Mossad involvement in Sandy Hook (on the basis that I had seen no actual proof—even circumstantial—of such involvement) I was accused of “covering up for the Mossad” and of being “a Zionist agent.” (Seriously.)
_In fact, there is no proof that Mossad assassins were involved in any shooting (real or staged) in Sandy Hook.
_How the Mossad was involved in Sandy Hook was in a way most of the great conspiracy theorists clearly were unable to figure out, so busy they were with distributing the increasingly more silly and unlikely conspiracy theories that were running wild on the Internet.
_The Mossad was hiding in plain sight and the patriot researchers and conspiracy theorists never saw it at all.
_It was clearly allies (or outright assets) of the Mossad—figures in Cass Sunstein’s Crisis Management gang—who were conjuring up and distributing the ridiculous stories that gained such currency. In effect, the patriots were passing on Mossad-sponsored black propaganda and they never understood that at all!
_And, naturally, this had the desired effect of making any and all conspiracy theorists—especially anyone who might date mention the dread word “Mossad”— look crazy,marginal and generally to be disbelieved.
_So, in that sense, the Mossad was behind Sandy Hook but not in the way that many Sandy Hook true believers might like to think.At the very least, the Mossad profited from Sandy Hook by being able to monitor (and manipulate) the conspiracy theories that emerged. It was a classic experiment in Crisis Management and Mind Control and the patriot dissidents never understood that at all.
_And that’s precisely why the bad folks at the Mossad and their allies among the Crisis Management Conspirators had a good laugh at the antics of the “patriots” who were hawking the latest disinformation inserted onto the Internet designed to make those patriots look foolish.
_But despite the contradictions in this realm (and in other aspects of the stories circulating about Sandy Hook) that didn’t seem to phase many who helped spread the stories saying,“I’m just passing on what I’ve heard.” These people actually believed that as a member of “The Crowd” they were doing their patriotic duty, having no idea they were being manipulated by the very forces they were seeking to combat!
_The Crisis Management Conspirators had once again put the theoretical precepts of their High Priest—LeBon—into practice by conjuring up (and putting into distribution via the Internet) the most audaciously ridiculous narratives.They knew full well that “The Crowd” would buy into these stories without question.As LeBon wrote:
_The figurative imagination of crowds is very powerful, very active and very susceptible of being keenly impressed. The images evoked in their mind by a personage, an event, an accident, are almost as lifelike as the reality._Clearly, this phenomenon explains why so many otherwise sensible people began to believe some of the most extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook set loose on the Internet by theretofore unknown“sources” with no record of recognition or credibility in any way, shape or form.
_Crowds are to some extent in the position of the sleeper whose reason, suspended for the time being, allows the arousing in his mind of images of extreme intensity which would quickly be dissipated could they be submitted to the action of reflection.
_Crowds, being incapable both of reflection and of reasoning, are devoid of the notion of improbability; and it is to be noted that in a general way it is the most improbable things that are the most striking.
_This is why it happens that it is always the marvellous and legendary side of events that more specially strike crowds.
_Because so much of this material was being so quickly and so widely distributed and then being re-distributed by others eager for new information about Sandy Hook, these improbable and ridiculous notions effectively became a matter of fact. And, as LeBon said, the “marvellous”—that is, the most striking, even outrageous—aspects of the Sandy Hook theories were what took hold.
_Before long, it was being said that accused Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza hadn’t even fired a single shot that day.According to the story, he had never even been in the school that day—not alive, at least. The story was that Lanza had been formally declared dead by the Social Security administration one day before the shooting—and that he died in New Hampshire (a state away). The real conspirators behind Sandy Hook had not only killed Lanza the day before,but—evidently following the law (!)—they had made certain to register his death with the Social Security administration, law-abiding folks that these conspirators were.
_When some “theorists”were pressed on this point, they could only respond,“Oh, well, they wanted us to discover that.This was their way of confounding us and showing us they could do anything they wanted. They wanted us to see that there really was much more to the story but they also wanted to display their power to cover up the truth.”
_Hardly a day had gone by before it was alleged that the police and fire departments were involved in the conspiracy, deliberately blocking the exits to the school during the shooting for the purpose of ensuring that the killers could rack up as high a body count as possible.
_The county coroner’s public persona rubbed people the wrong way. Somebody pronounced the judgment that he wasn’t “acting right” for someone who had just performed autopsies on a bunch of purportedly dead children and therefore he definitely had to be in on the act. He was just “too weird.”
_Soon enough, that was the final word on the matter among dissidents. Somebody had said it, so therefore it had to be true.
_But the real question is this: WHO first said it and why did THEIR judgment effectively become the last word on the subject—“proof”of a much-bigger conspiracy?
_Nobody seemed to know precisely where so much of the “dissident” opinions were coming from—but whatever was said was freely passed on as though it constituted solid proof of “something.”
_Because the police initially prevented families from viewing the bullet- ripped corpses of the children, word spread that the families never once saw their dead children at all, despite the fact there were open casket funerals for a number of the children the conspiracy theorists said had never really died.
_Wax figures in the coffins,maybe? Designed to fool the parents who believed that their children had been killed? (Or were the parents, as some said, in on the conspiracy?)
_“If they reported that the families couldn’t see the bodies,” demand ed those who said they were “just asking questions,” then why, they asked,didn’t the media then report that the families were finally allowed to see the bodies?
_In fact, as anyone who has watched any of the standard police procedural dramas that occupy much of television today knows full well, it is not police procedure to allow the bodies of crime victims to be immediately inspected by the families. And no, that’s not “just Hollywood.” That’s how it really works.
_Ask your local policeman.
_In fact, families were later allowed to view the remains of their dead loved ones and in several instances (brought to my attention) there were open caskets for children who had died.
_Here’s the story:
_In a radio broadcast on Jan. 20, 2013 I had urgently warned truth seekers not to be taken in by all of this emerging nonsense and came under a great deal of criticism from many good folks who were fervent believers in the theory that no children had died and that the stories told by surviving Sandy Hook teachers (and children) were all lies.
_However, I was heartened when—during an email exchange between myself and two well-known and respected patriots, Carol Asher, the longtime assistant to famed peace officer Jack McLamb, and Ron Neil of the Dollar DVD Project Liberty (see the website at onedollardvdproject. com)—Ron sent me this email saying: “You surprised me with your attitude about Sandy Hook. I respect your opinion and will be more careful on this subject.You reminded me that we must focus and not get sidetracked.”
_(My whole point from the start! But most people who had joined the Sandy Hook frenzy couldn’t quite see that, as Ron Neil clearly did.
_And—to the heart of the matter—Ron also sent Carol and I a communication from one of his correspondents who was commenting critically on allegations that Sandy Hook teacher Kaitlin Roig was a fraud.
_While Roig was being hailed as a heroine for having rescued her students, there were truth seekers who had become convinced by the disinformation from the Crisis Management Conspirators that Roig was an audacious liar.Neil’s correspondent took issue with the claim—circulating on the Internet—that Roig wasn’t even a teacher.
_In fact, she wrote: “She [Roig] is my grandson’s teacher and I know that part is factual,” adding a very real warning for truth seekers:
_I think that a huge mistake has been made for the alternative media. We are looking like "nuts" . . . especially the people that say that nobody died. My daughter went to several wakes and funerals. And . . . she saw open caskets. Some of her dear friends lost their children!_In the meantime, though, this teacher,Kaitlin Roig, was being called “a possible Israeli Mossad terrorist” and a “false witness” and was subjected to the claim that she was really actress Rebekah Fernandez who was supposedly posing as a fake Sandy Hook teacher—namely Roig!
_So although there was very real proof that Roig was a Sandy Hook teacher, there were people who were saying that she was actually a “Crisis Actor”—much more about the Crisis Actor theories later—who was playing a part to help perpetrate a gigantic fraud.
_However, one truth seeker—recognizing that there was something wrong with all of this—commented in response to an Internet posting of a video of an interview with Roig that critics “proved” she was a liar, an audacious actress posing as a heroine:
_What doesn't make sense to me, too, is that this Kaitlyn Roig is supposed to be a paid actor, yet she is, or was, a teacher at the time of the shooting?_And—get this—some of Roig’s critics even thought the fact that Roig was married immediately after Sandy Hook was additional proof that she just couldn’t be for real.“If she was so affected by the tragedy,” people growled,“how could she dare get married?” This was the kind of genuinely crazy theorizing (and thinking) that the Crisis Management Conspirators had so effectively conjured up.
_I mean, so let me get this straight: She taught at this school for, how long?
_But, suddenly, now that this incident happened, and she's giving this report about what went down in her own classroom, suddenly she's just labeled a "paid actor," because people think she's lying?
_(A personal note: My oldest brother and his wife were married on the very day just hours her cousin and two of their childhood friends— who were supposed to attend that wedding—were killed in a tragic explosion. Nobody—absolutely nobody—perceived their decision to proceed with the marriage as being crass or as inappropriate.)
_But in the wake of Sandy Hook, it became an article of faith that anyone who seemed to affirm the“official” story in any way was lying. And it was such an attitude that gripped the minds of truth seekers to the point, as Ron Neil’s aforementioned correspondent said, that “We are looking like ‘nuts.’”
_But truth seekers had become so much a part of “The Crowd” that they couldn’t see what was happening and how they were effectively discrediting themselves in the minds of the public.
_And then the fact that the police would not release particular details of the shooting was said to be “proof” that there was a cover-up. But, again, the truth is that even a cursory reading of any daily newspaper reporting on the most mundane of events involving a police investigation will reveal—time and time again—that the police just simply do not go about releasing a lot of data while any investigation is going on. That’s a fact that can be confirmed by even the most casual reference to any given newspaper in any town or city in the country.
_However, under the clever contrivance of the Crisis Management Conspirators,honest truth seekers had become totally distracted,caught up in minutiae that was absolutely irrelevant but which, nonetheless, seemed to possess the patriot movement, as if by magic.
_The proverbial “Crowd” had been caught up in a whirlwind of deliberate disinformation. It was as though some people genuinely wanted to believe that nothing—absolutely nothing—was true.That all was a lie. And a lot of cheap hucksters—along with the Crisis Management Conspirators—played on this.
_It was even said that the governor of Connecticut had advance knowledge of the impending “event”—we’ll call it an event, rather than a shooting, since a lot of people don’t think anybody was really shot at Sandy Hook in the first place!
_The basis of this rumor was the fact the governor had said publicly that he had been told that such an event could happen.
_What the governor was saying—and this was no secret—was that public schools and other venues—public and private, including shopping malls, bus stations, etc—had been training their own personnel in the matter of dealing with such an emergency.
_However, the governor’s comment—based on something that had been widely reported for months, even years, on end in the mass media (that is, how communities were preparing to deal with such events)— was twisted and presented as a Freudian slip that revealed the governor’s foreknowledge of the impending crisis at Sandy Hook.
_According to one claim, it was Attorney General Eric Holder (evidently another of the many conspirators) who briefed the governor a full month in advance that there was going to be a phony happening at Sandy Hook to be presented to the public as a “school shooting.”
_How many other public officials and law enforcement were brought into the loop no one could really say for sure, but then, again, it had already been suggested (as noted earlier) that the local police and fire departments were part of the massacre (or, at least, the cover-up). It seemed like the entire town was involved. But, then again, there were those who were saying that no massacre had even really happened!
_It came down to this: There were some 500 students at Sandy Hook. However, as we’ve said, some people don’t believe there really was a functioning school there at all. And it is said that—of those 500 students—20 of them (along with their families and others) faked their deaths.But some truth seekers—influenced by the disinformation of the Crisis Management Conspirators—now question whether at least some—if not all—of these students ever even existed!
_But accepting the idea that 20 students are no longer officially alive (and thus presumably in hiding) that means there are some 480 other students (and roughly 960 parents) and lord knows how many thousands upon thousands of siblings, grandparents, aunts and uncles related to the “surviving” 480 kids who are participating in one of the most extraordinary hoaxes of modern history.
_Meanwhile, others said, Newtown, Connecticut and its environs was an outpost of Satanism and that most of the people in town were Satanists.
_That explained why virtually everyone was involved in the conspiracy designed to portray a non-event as a bloody massacre.
_When sober patriot critics pointed out that Satanists are known to engage in real blood-letting and don’t generally “fake” such events, preferring the very real slaughter of little children, those who were advocates of the theory that “the Satanists” had helped conjure the Sandy Hook hoax were hard-pressed to respond.
_Others claimed there were people in Newtown who knew the whole affair was a “hoax” and wanted to speak out (or who were speaking out privately) but they didn’t want their names revealed.Those people were either being blackmailed or coerced in some fashion.
_In other words, an entire community—a town of nearly 30,000 people— was held under such control that not a single person would (or could) go public and blow the whistle and expose the hoax!
_The theory is yours to choose: Either most of the people in the town were Satanists or otherwise somehow in on the plot or most of the people were somehow being prevented from daring to speak out.
_And part of the whole big plot—so some say—is that (as we keep reminding you) there wasn’t even really a functioning school at the structure in Sandy Hook where the “phony” shooting took place.
_I kid you not.
_Those unfamiliar with all of the give-and-take that erupted on the Internet simply have no idea how truly outlandish it all became. It does get a little confusing, to be sure, but that didn’t stop people from spreading the stories.
_For God’s sake,don’t let anything stand in the way of a good story— especially if attracts traffic to your Internet website (and brings you a bundle full of cash contributions).
_On one occasion a very prominent “patriot” radio broadcaster extended his sympathies to the people of Newtown for the lives lost at Sandy Hook and then,minutes later, on the same broadcast, referred to the matter as a gigantic hoax that never happened.
_Why the broadcaster felt the need to extend his sympathy to Newtown for a tragedy that hadn’t really taken place remains a mystery (to me). But he had a lot of followers who hung on his every word.
_All of that having been said, it’s no surprise, when we continue to review the work of Gustave Le Bon—who provided the playbook for the Crisis Management Conspirators—to see that Le Bon had been able to project with absolute certainly that the insertion of wild claims into “The Crowd” would prove a perfect means of splitting the dissident movement from within.
_Le Bon described what he called“the intolerance,dictatorialness and conservatism of crowds,” and recognizing this factor, the Crisis Management Conspirators played this phenomenon to the hilt.
_These malicious manipulators knew full well that the moment cautious, detail-oriented, fact-focused researchers questioned the disinformation and nonsense that this would enrage those in“The Crowd” who had been coopted into what had essentially become a Sandy Hook Cult. Here’s how Le Bon put it:
_Crowds are only cognisant of simple and extreme sentiments; the opinions, ideas, and beliefs suggested to them are accepted or rejected as a whole, and considered as absolute truths or as not less absolute errors._And just as LeBon had suggested, those honest truth seekers who dared to question the fallacious (and patently ridiculous) stories that had been injected into discussion of Sandy Hook came under the most intense fire from otherwise good people—and the Crisis Management Conspirators absolutely loved it.
_This is always the case with beliefs induced by a process of suggestion instead of engendered by reasoning.
_Every one is aware of the intolerance that accompanies religious beliefs, and of the despotic empire they exercise on men's minds.
_Being in doubt as to what constitutes truth or error, and having,on the other hand, a clear notion of its strength, a crowd is as disposed to give authoritative effect to its inspirations as it is intolerant.
_An individual may accept contradiction and discussion; a crowd will never do so. At public meetings the slightest contradiction on the part of an orator is immediately received with howls of fury and violent invective, soon followed by blows, and expulsion should the orator stick to his point.
_As incredible as it may seem to readers who will learn of this for the first time, even those who dared to suggest that perhaps children did actually die at Sandy Hook were called “traitors” by other patriots who had bought into the disinformation being inserted into the minds of patriots via the Crisis Management Conspirators working to discredit “conspiracy theories” in any form.
_Thanks to the Orwellian manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief in Sandy Hook as having been a massive hoax was essentially being instituted as a virtual litmus test as to“who’s a real patriot and who isn’t.” Those who didn’t believe Sandy Hook was a massive hoax are denounced as having been “bribed, blackmailed, or coerced” or just having simply “changed sides.”
_Veteran patriots said they had never seen anything like it—and they recognized it was because of the influence of the Internet (or rather, the influence of those Crisis Management Conspirators who were abusing the Internet for their own insidious purposes).
_In short, Sandy Hook effectively emerged as a cult, with its own unique built-in theology that cannot be questioned. To raise any doubts about the foundation of the cult was—and still is—considered heresy. Anyone who doubted even the most unlikely portion of the Sandy Hook theories was portrayed as a “traitor to the patriot movement”—or that’s what the Crisis Management Conspirators wanted patriots to think!
_The successful introduction by the Crisis Management Conspirators of their own disinformation into the patriot movement had set in motion a very real crisis—in and of itself—in which real patriots were being crucified for standing up and calling out the real conspirators for trying to mislead patriots.
_One longtime critic of gun control was accused of lending support to pro-gun control forces because he believed children died at Sandy Hook—a total disconnect, of course, but illustrative of the kind of mindset that was taking hold.
_Another person was accused of being “pro-Obama” because he doubted some Sandy Hook theories, the apparent presumption being that since Sandy Hook took place under the hated Obama’s watch that anyone who believed the official story therefore had to be pro-Obama for believing the basic claim that a crazed lone gunman was responsible.
_(On the other hand, though,as we’ve noted, some of the others who believed that there was a bigger story to Sandy Hook believed Israel’s Mossad had carried out the crime in order to hurt President Obama whereas others believed the Mossad did so in order to help him.)
_So, as we said, choose your favorite theory—courtesy of Cass Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_It was almost like Alice in Wonderland—definitely beyond belief. If there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’s this: There’s more to the Sandy Hook story than even the most dedicated conspiracy theorists understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.”
_The Crisis Management Conspirators (via Internet monitoring) were able to see preciselyWHO spread the rumors via email and fromWHAT websites and sources they got their information in the first place.
_As a direct consequence of this one event and the frenzy surrounding it, the powers-that-be had an absolute first-ever 24/7 fool-proof method of monitoring communications and resources within the circles of the dissident movement.
_The Sandy Hook venture itself was just stage one in the scheme, giving them the opportunity to observe and weigh the responses of the conspiracy theorists to the actual events that had occurred and to monitor their responses to the often-illogical and contradictory tales being bandied about by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_On the broader scale, in the bigger picture, the Crisis crowd was laying the groundwork to have—in the future—a more precise, more calibrated focus on the exchange of information by the conspiracy theorists and to be able to actually dominate and direct the course of their thinking altogether. And, naturally—if necessary—to discredit them in no uncertain terms in the minds of the general population.
_Perhaps even more importantly, the Sunstein-inspired program of monitoring and manipulation now made it possible to lay the groundwork—as appropriate—in manipulating opinion during some future major event, perhaps one already well-planned in advance— another 9-11, if you will—or some scheme still in the works.
_Sandy Hook was indeed a “false flag” of the first order—and it had the ultimate impact of totally misdirecting the attention of patriots from the real forces that were laying out the misinformation that was so thoroughly misdirecting them.
_In the end, one of the most respected longtime patriot voices, Devvy Kidd, dared to put it all in perspective.On April 28, 2013, on her website at newswithviews.com,Kidd laid it on the line:
_Over the past nearly two decades,every time some horrific “event” happens,wanna be "journalists" come out of the wood work with their conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing. Bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank speculation. Irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or to get people to their web sites._What a damned shame there were not more voices of caution raised while the Sandy Hook affair was in its frenzy. But there were too many people in “The Crowd” who had been captivated by the virus of manufactured conspiracy fever that had been spawned in the Mind Control laboratories of the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_They have zero credibility and hurt the rest of us by being lumped together. I have debunked conspiracy theories in the past based on documentation. I get attacked as if I'm the bad guy for pursuing the truth! There are conspiracies and coverups, but we want the truth, not speculation.
_And, if truth be told, there were many so-called “leaders” of the would-be “truth movement” who were afraid to dissent, fearful of being called “traitors” and accused of being “agents of Barack Obama and the NewWorld Order” if they dared to say that the foolish madness inserted into the minds of truth seekers (via the machinations of the Conspiracy Management gang) was just that: a bunch of foolishness.
_The whole Sandy Hook venture was largely a “private” affair, in that the circumstances surrounding the event were essentially limited to what did—or did not—take place within the confines of that elementary school in Newtown.
_However, not long afterward—on April 15, 2013—with the very “public” event involving the Boston Marathon (on the very open and public streets of Boston) the Crisis Management Conspirators were able to fine tune what they had already honed into a specialized “science”: a tool of Orwellian manipulation of the first—and worst—order.
_With Boston, the Sunstein thesis—now a live-action, real-time project in motion, having been successfully tested with Sandy Hook—was adapted to a much bigger,more broad-ranging event that (all of the nonsensical theories accompanying it notwithstanding) had all the earmarks of having been a very real “false flag”operation of Israel’s Mossad. But, once again, the truth seekers were misdirected . . .
CHAPTER THIRTY . . .
Who “The Crisis Actors” REALLY Are:
How Truth Seekers Were Manipulated
into Ignoring Genuine “False Flag” Terrorism
and Focusing Instead on Irrelevant Lunacy
_The manipulation by the Crisis Management Conspirators of the events at Sandy Hook was, in retrospect, a quite logical response to the phenomenon of 9-11 truthseeking (much of it Internet-based) which, in turn, had its own antecedents in the search for the truth surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing and the JFK assassination so many years before.
_In that sense,we might suggest, there was indeed a secret connection, so to speak, between 9-11 and Sandy Hook—but it’s one that even the most fervent believers in the “big” story of Sandy Hook never realized, precisely because of the fact they had found themselves (most of them, to this day, unknowingly) caught in the web of disinformation being spun by the high-level Crisis Management Conspirators.
_And one of the biggest cons of all perpetrated upon the legitimate truth seekers was the legend of “The Crisis Actors”—mentioned earlier— that came to be an article of faith surrounding Sandy Hook and later again, even more so, following the events at the Boston Marathon.
_And as we’ve already noted (perhaps all too often) in the wake of Sandy Hook many people actually believed that there hadn’t even been any gunplay at all—that no children and no adults were shot that day, that it was all a big staged event, with the purported victims and their families (along with law enforcement) in on the deal.
_This is where the now much-discussed topic of “The Crisis Actors” was brought into play.And, in many respects, it may have been one of the most ingenious scams ever pawned off on American patriots designed to misdirect their attention.
_It was right out of Cass Sunstein’s playbook.
_During the wake of Sandy Hook, people got so distracted talking about the Crisis Actors and the claim that "Lanza was dead the day before the shooting which really didn't happen and in which no kids were really killed," that, in many cases, they didn't do what they should have done: Lobby forcefully against the gun control measures that were being crafted as a consequence of the tragedy at Sandy Hook.
_Many patriots became genuinely convinced that by talking about “The Crisis Actors” that they were winning the day and convincing people of the dangers of gun control when, in fact, they were actually misdirecting good people and, for all intents and purposes,discrediting honest Americans who were opposed to gun control.
_As a result of the widespread distribution of claims that Sandy Hook was a big fraud being perpetrated by “Crisis Actors” many Americans concluded that the opponents of gun control were trouble-makers, wildeyed conspiracy theorists and just generally to be dismissed.
_That, ultimately,was the aim of the Crisis Management Conspirators. Their introduction of the concept of“CrisisActors” into the debate was part and parcel of the very real conspiracy—first outlined by Cass Sunstein—to discredit conspiracy theories in general.
_And all of this undoubtedly did immense damage to the reputation of many good patriots who opposed gun control and who were led into the trap of focusing on the Crisis Actor legend rather than on the very real and important issue at hand.
_And what is so remarkable is that, to this day, although patriotic folks who regularly discuss Sandy Hook and Boston speak in hushed (and not-so-hushed) tones about “The Crisis Actors” and the role that they supposedly played in those events, there is not one single individual who is able to say precisely “who” it was who first introduced the concept of the CrisisActors into the vernacular of the Sandy Hook truth seekers.And that is telling, in and of itself.
_We know, for example, following the JFK assassination, that it was Mark Lane who largely popularized the term“grassy knoll”—relating to the likely positioning in Dealey Plaza of one of the gunmen who fired on President Kennedy.
_But Lane himself is the first to admit that he first heard the term “grassy knoll” used by one of the assassination witnesses, Jean Hill,who used that term in an interview.And Hill herself has said that this just happened to be the particular phraseology that popped into her head in seeking a way to describe that geographic location in Dealey Plaza.
_And that’s how the term “grassy knoll” ultimately came into widespread parlance, not only in reference to the JFK assassination but also in reference to “conspiracy theories” in general.
_But there is absolutely nobody who can explain just who it was who “figured out” that Crisis Actors had been utilized as part of the Sandy Hook (and later the Boston Marathon) conspiracy.
_And the reason for that is that this whole concept of Crisis Actors having been dispatched as part of the conspiracy was a creation of the Crisis Management Conspirators themselves.
_Now let it be said that there really are people known as Crisis Actors.They do exist.They’ve been around for a while.
_However, the proponents of the Crisis Actors theory relating to Sandy Hook (and later the Boston Marathon) would have people believe that the existence of CrisisActors is some deep dark secret, that they are part of a long-standing high-level covert operation kept from the public, perhaps a creation of Homeland Security or the CIA or some combination of elements of the emerging American Police State, paid agents of the vaunted military-industrial-complex.
_It’s an exciting theory, to be sure, but the truth is that—for years—you have been able go to the Internet and find a number of Internet websites of real-life profit-making businesses that train and provide Crisis Actors who interact with government (local, state and federal) as well as private industries and enterprises in preparing to deal with crisis events of various kinds, including mass shootings, hostage situations, earthquakes, fires, riots—all manner of chaos.
_One such business engaging in the Crisis Actor industry (which is what it amounts to) is crisisactors.org.
_On the website of that company, their promotional material reads:
“Crisis Actors: Trained Players and Actors Making it Real,” stating that their mission is: “Helping schools and first responders create realistic drills, full-scale exercises, high-fidelity simulations, and interactive 3D films.” The website even includes a section called “Crisis Acting News” highlighting a variety of events in which their skills and services have been utilized (and openly publicized in newspapers and televised by broadcast outlets in local communities across the country).
_Here are just a few examples from crisisactors.org, citing Internet links to some of the newspapers and broadcast outlets that have cited the work of Crisis Actors in their particular communities.
_• Active Shooter Training At Closed Elementary School in Plymouth - Patch.com_All across the United States today there are members of local police and fire departments, emergency response units—even members of the National Guard—who have worked with CrisisActors on a regular basis.
_• Local law enforcement agencies take active shooter training - KOB.com
_• Lower Burrell police conduct 'active shooter' training at Burrell High School - Tribune-Review
_• HSI holding 'active shooter' training in NM - Alamogordo Daily News
_• Active-shooter drill to be conducted at Fulton-Montgomery Community College -WRGB
_• New Canaan To Conduct Active Shooter Drill On Thursday - The Daily Voice
_•Waterloo Schools Active Shooter Training - KGANTV
_The existence, then, of Crisis Actors is no big secret. But it wasn’t until the Crisis Management Conspirators deliberately hyped the legend (via the Internet) that Crisis Actors were part of the conspiracy at Sandy Hook that many people became aware of their existence.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators inserted the legend of the Crisis Actors onto the Internet with the expectation that it would become a part of the lore of Sandy Hook and help add confusion and—more importantly—play a significant part in discrediting conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists in the minds of the broad general public.
_Essentially, in relation to Sandy Hook, in particular, the Crisis Actors Theory held that, for example, Robbie Parker, the father of one of the children killed at Sandy Hook,was actually a Crisis Actor.
_The claim was based on the fact that—just prior to giving a public statement expressing his horror at the loss of his child—Parker smiled and laughed and then asked if the cameras were on yet and then,while speaking, referred to written notes. Nobody who had actually lost a child under such tragic circumstances, it was proclaimed,would actually smile or laugh.Nor would they need to refer to written notes.
_Such allegations are patently ridiculous. People react differently to tragedy. Some people put on a brave face when confronted with tragedy.And most people have never been confronted with a horde of reporters and television cameras converging on their home in the wake of such an internationally-publicized tragedy in which they (and their dead child) have unwittingly become a part.
_The idea someone would need to rely on notes to speak publicly is not so outrageous.Very few people are trained in public speaking and often need notes, just as even professional speakers rely on written texts when giving their own presentations. But the fact that Robbie Parker was using notes was suddenly “proof” that he was a Crisis Actor!
_So when the Crisis Management Conspirators put out the idea that Robbie Parker was a Crisis Actor whose child hadn’t been killed, Parker began receiving threats for “play acting” and the controlled media (allied with the Crisis Management Conspirators) immediately brought this to the attention of the general public who were quite correctly horrified that “those conspiracy theorists”would actually question the grief of a mourning parent and suggest that he was “faking” his child’s death.
_What most of those who bought into the idea Parker was a Crisis Actor never seemed to consider was the point that if he was a Crisis Actor, he probably wouldn’t have needed written notes when he “performed” for the cameras. Actors—you see—rely upon their skills to remember their lines.Actors generally don’t use cue cards or at least not ones that they hold right there in front of them while speaking!
_Later, it was even alleged that Parker’s dead child was actually photographed in the presence of Barack Obama when he visited Newtown to meet with the families. In other words, that the “phony” Parker and his family (all part of the conspiracy) had brazenly dared to allow the supposedly dead child to be shown to be alive after it was said that she had been killed at Sandy Hook.
_The claim was based on the fact that the surviving sisters of the dead child bore a striking resemblance to the victim—that happens in families, you know—and that one of the children in the picture with Obama seemed to be wearing the same dress that the dead child had previously been photographed wearing.That was “proof” that it was the dead child who was, it was said, still alive.
_But any family with multiple sons or daughters knows that the clothing of older children is passed on to younger children. But then, again,when it came time to promote the idea of Crisis Actors—and the theme that “no children died at Sandy Hook”—simple points such as that seemed to get lost in the Crisis Management Conspiracy Barndance.
_In another instance, a parent of one of the dead children was accused of being a Crisis Actor because the parent said in an interview that one of his surviving children said that she wanted to urge President Obama to support gun control. No child in grade school, it was said, would be thinking about a political issue such as gun control. Especially, it was added, after one of her siblings had been killed.
_The idiocy of such a claim should be obvious. School children do have political opinions and even “vote” in mock presidential elections every four years—from first grade through graduation—even if they don’t necessarily understand the political issues.
_Young children do know who the president is and in this “Information Age” they do hear about issues such as gun control, in particular, on a 24/7 basis, whether or television or radio or even on the Internet, and especially after such a crisis as Sandy Hook.
_And it’s entirely possible that a child who had lost a sibling at a school shooting would want to express her concerns about gun control to “the president” who is perceived as the man who rules America and who makes important decisions about big issues such as gun control.
_In fact, they said, a lot of the well-known Sandy Hook personalities featured in the media were actors—why, they never even lived in Sandy Hook at all! (Just as they had said that the school was not even a functioning school at the time of the purported shooting!)
_Various cuts of what is called“raw”media footage of one Sandy Hook celebrity—a notably obnoxious character named Gene Rosen (a veritable stereotype for a particular type of Jewish caricature often seen in Hollywood comedy)—telling bits and pieces of what he claimed to have seen, was cited as proof Rosen had “practiced” his lines (like an actor) and that the story he was telling was just not true.
_Rosen—who was clearly a publicity hound who reveled in his brief brush with the proverbial “15 minutes of fame”—was over-the-top to the point of being annoying and—in fact—the media people who had interviewed Rosen had taped him at various moments and Rosen was clearly fine-tuning, even rehearsing what he was about to say in the various “cuts” of the raw footage that later popped up on the Internet.
_As such it was immediately insinuated that Rosen was a Crisis Actor dispatched by the powers-that-be to craft a bit of film propaganda for the benefit of the American public to help perpetrate the“lie” that there had been a shooting at the school.
_But here is what is important to remember . . .
_What all of the patriot conspiracy theorists seemed to miss was this big question: How was it that this raw footage—taped by a cameramen from the Controlled Media—just happened to be leaked to the conspiracy theorists as “proof” that Rosen was a Crisis Actor?
_Clearly, there were people in the Controlled Media—in league with the Crisis Management Conspirators—who were deliberately helping propagate the legend of the Crisis Actors by leaking raw footage such as this.
_They knew with absolute certainty that the people in “The Crowd” who had bought into the CrisisActors theory would jump on the Rosen story in a heartbeat.And that is precisely what they did.
In the end, you see, the real CrisisActors were not the parents of the murdered children (or even the ridiculous Gene Rosen).
_Instead the Crisis Actors were actually those “cyber shills” (posing as “truth seekers”) who were acting out a very specific role—acting on behalf of the Crisis Management Conspirators—in bombarding the Internet with all of the outlandish stories that distracted patriots and truth seekers from the big picture and thereby helping discredit all forms of conspiracy theories (and conspiracy theorists) in general.
_It’s just so damned obvious.
_In fact, it’s typical Zionist Israeli trickery:
_(1) Operating in plain sight;
_(2) Standing there in vampire’s garb,pointing at someone dressed as an angel, and shouting,“There’s the vampire over there!” and
_(3) Thoroughly distracting everyone from the big picture.
This frequent Zionist tactic of accusing others of what they are in fact guilty of has been aptly described as “accusatory projection” or “accusatory inversion.”
_The Crisis Actors theme got ever more ridiculous as the story was repeated again and again.At one point it was even claimed a catering truck—said to be on the scene at Sandy Hook—had been dispatched to cater food and beverages for the Crisis Actors at work perpetuating the conspiracy, just as—it was pointed out—catering trucks will be found on the scene when Hollywood films are being made “on location.”
_I’ve personally seen one of these catering trucks parked just a few blocks from my own home on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. when actor Clint Eastwood was filming a rooftop chase scene for his action film In the Line of Fire.Despite this, however, I sincerely doubt that the Sandy Hook “conspiracy” was so fine-tuned that the conspirators sent a catering truck to keep the Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook well nourished.
_Yet, I am here to tell you that the Crisis Management Conspirators managed to convince a lot of well meaning people that this is actually what really happened. (Oh, those nasty caterers—conspirators all!)
_And here’s something about the Crisis Actors disinformation that needs to be mentioned—and this will astound many readers who will learn about this for the first time . . .
_In fact, one of the most vociferous proponents of the Crisis Actors theory—a character who uses the name “DallasGoldbug”—also put forth the following assertions regarding other “actors” he claims to have discovered posturing in the public arena:
_• John F. Kennedy did not die in Dallas but reinvented himself as future president Jimmy Carter;_And here are three of my personal favorites from“Dallas Goldbug” involving three individuals whom I have known quite well:
_• A single woman posed as not only actress Marilyn Monroe but also former First Ladies Jacqueline Kennedy and Rosalyn Carter;
_• Former Vice President Nelson Rockefeller was really country and western singer Tex Ritter;
_• Billionaire David Rockefeller is actually popular conspiracy theorist Jordan Maxwell;
_• David Rockefeller, Jr. is another popular conspiracy theorist William Cooper (who was killed by police in 2001);
_• Famed country singer Patsy Cline posed as Marina Oswald, the wife of JFK’s accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald;
_• Comic actor Chevy Chase poses as Sen. Jay Rockefeller;
_• Former Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo is now posing as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” Joe Arpaio of Arizona;
_• Infamous Nazi figure Adolf Eichmann was really the popular singer and motion picture star Bing Crosby; and
_• No less than Adolf Hitler was actually Walt Disney.
_•Nelson Rockefeller’s son, Rodman, poses as veteran JFK assassination researcher Mark Lane;_DallasGoldbug posted “convincing” video and photographic evidence that“proved”these contentions,yet many who were caught up in the claims about Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston had no idea that the Crisis Actors story was also inextricably linked to this lunacy.
_• Famed former State Rep. David Duke, is actually a Hollywood actor named Thomas Haden Church; and _•Actor JonathanWinters posed as longtime American Free Press “Bilderberg Hound” James P. Tucker, Jr.;
_In fact, Gustave LeBon—the grand guru of the the Crisis Management Conspirators—had described how the “crowd” could be dazzled by all sorts of images and in the aftermath of the Boston Maraton bombing, “The Crowd” of our modern day was indeed captivated by dazzling images which they believed “proved” that there had been hanky panky on the streets of Boston.
_In fact, many "truth seekers" picked up the stories being put out by the phony patriots—the Crisis Actors working for the Sunstein gang—that there wasn't even really any bombing at all! It was akin to the claim—which had already proven successful in winning credence with the real patriots—that there hadn’t even been a shooting at Sandy Hook.
_And while the whole story of what really happened at Boston has yet to be unraveled,what we do know is that two young Muslims (the Tsarnaev brothers) were accused of the crime—yet another Muslim “false flag” akin to the 9-11 tragedy.
_And we also know that evidence indicates that the intelligence services of the United States,Russia—and certainly Israel—had their eyes on the Tsarnaevs for a long time prior to the bombing, just as the ADL and other Israeli-connected elements were “monitoring” Timothy McVeigh prior to the Oklahoma City bombing.
_However—at this juncture—we don’t know the entire scenario, but we do know there has been a lot of disinformation put into circulation designed to deflect attention away from Israel which is certainly (beyond question) the prime beneficiary of the crime as a consequence of the purported danger from the Muslim world continuing to be in the forefront of the mind (and concerns) of the American people.
_In short, Boston was simply a replay of the 9-11 false flag that redirected American thinking in the wake of that tragedy.
_It was a reinvigoration of the template for terror utilized in 9-11 and in the Oklahoma bombing and in the JFK assassination involving, yet again, the widespread dissemination of carefully-crafted disinformation designed to cover Israeli involvement in those acts of terror.
_(For my own part, from the beginning, it has been my opinion that Israel was behind the Boston bombing for the precise purpose of conjuring up another Muslim“false flag.” I expressed this view in a broadcast interview at theuglytruth.wordpress.com with Mark Glenn who shares my view on this matter.)
_Yet, the Crisis Management Conspirators successfully distracted truth seekers—who were convinced that, once again, the authorities were covering up the truth about the Boston bombing—by cranking up the Crisis _Actors legend (first spawned in the wake of Sandy Hook).
_Rather than focusing on who was behind the bombing, truth seekers focused instead on stories—with accompanying videos and photographic images of the chaos following the bombing—planted on the Internet in conjunction with the insistent claim that Crisis Actors were busy on the streets of Boston detaching false arms and legs and faking injuries and throwing around buckets of stage blood for the benefit of video cameras.
_All of the imagery captured the attention of the patriots who suddenly showed little—if any—interest in trying to determine who was responsible for the Muslim “false flag” that the Controlled Media was waving in the face of a horrified American public.
_Here is how Le Bon described precisely this kind of manipulation.
_Crowds being only capable of thinking in images are only to be impressed by images. It is only images that terrify or attract them and become motives of action._Le Bon realized—and the Crisis Management Conspirators recognized that he was absolutely correct—that these kind of images were ideal for the purpose of Crowd Control and mass manipulation:
_For this reason theatrical representations, in which the image is shown in its most clearly visible shape, always have an enormous influence on crowds. Bread and spectacular shows constituted for the plebeians of ancient Rome the ideal of happiness, and they asked for nothing more.
_Throughout the successive ages this ideal has scarcely varied. Nothing has a greater effect on the imagination of crowds of every category than theatrical representations.
_The entire audience experiences at the same time the same emotions, and if these emotions are not at once transformed into acts, it is because the most unconscious spectator cannot ignore that he is the victim of illusions, and that he has laughed or wept over imaginary adventures.
_Whatever strikes the imagination of crowds presents itself under the shape of a startling and very clear image, freed from all accessory explanation, or merely having as accompaniment a few marvellous or mysterious facts: examples in point are a great victory, a great miracle, a great crime, or a great hope. Things must be laid before the crowd as a whole, and their genesis must never be indicated._In the wake of Boston, the theme of “Crisis Actors” got further (and quite considerable) mileage with the use of such imagery.With Le Bon’s assertions about “The Crowd”—and its susceptibility to incorporating such images into its thinking—the Crisis Management gang kept conspiracy theorists busy.
_A hundred petty crimes or petty accidents will not strike the imagination of crowds in the least, whereas a single great crime or a single great accident will profoundly impress them, even though the results be infinitely less disastrous than those of the hundred small accidents put together.
_One widely circulated proof of the “conspiracy” was a selection of several frames from a video of the bombing. A few frames were “analyzed”—a few frames that represented just a few seconds of time—and were “found” to show a woman (said to be a Crisis Actor) “giving hand signs” and helping other Crisis Actors fake blood and injuries.
_To do all of this—live—before very REAL people who were not Crisis Actors but who WERE on the scene, would take more than seconds to accomplish successfully.
_Anyone who has ever participated in the taping of a television show or even an amateur home movie—let alone a serious film production—knows how much time and work is involved making just one “incident” look real, -and that it can’t be accomplished in just seconds!
_But most people—including a lot of good patriots—have never been involved in any such production and don’t have any idea that even one second in, for example, an old-style 8mm movie, can amount to as many as 18 different frames. Meaning, of course, that those who were microanalyzing the films that they said “proved” there had been fakery were actually analyzing milli-seconds, for God’s sake!
_Such simple facts were lost in the “Crisis Actors Shuffle” that accompanied the frenzy over the Boston bombing.
_A lot of good patriots fell into what we might call, for want of a better way of describing it,“the Trap of Belief,” because they had become familiar, in years past, with people who were quite accurately and correcting analyzing the famous (although remarkably brief) bit of film known as the Zapruder Film of the JFK assassinaton.
_Again and again over the years a variety of analysts had de-constructed the film, frame by frame, to demonstrate the point that it was clear, on film, that the official Warren Commission version of the JFK assassination was repudiated by what purported to be an actual amateur 8mm film taken at the time of the JFK assassination.
_(Now, ironically, there are those who say that Zapruder film itself is some sort of forgery or an altered version of the original film or even a combination of several films made to appear to be one.And the truth is that past and present technology does make such things possible.)
_As such, having seen (over some 50 years) such analysis of the Zapruder film (and other images of the JFK assassination) again and again, on video, on the Internet, in books and magazines, patriots and truth seekers became accustomed to this technique of conspiracy inquiry.And knowing that this was the case, following Sandy Hook and Boston, the Crisis Management Conspirators went assiduously to work and deliberately played on this when they began hyping the claims that Crisis Actors had staged false injuries (in a fake bombing) for the benefit of the American population at large.
_The consequence of this was that when honest truth-seekers began circulating the stories that videos of the bombing were “fakes,” many serious-minded folks in the general public began to think, quite frankly, that these truth seekers were just plain crazy.
_There were people from all over the United States who had come to the Boston Marathon and they went home to tell friends and family about their narrow brush with disaster,only to hear that there were conspiracy theorists on the Internet who were saying that the bombing didn’t happen and that nobody really lost an arm or a leg.
_And the“proof”was a few seconds of one film that went viral on the Internet which convinced the truth seekers that it was all a big lie!
_If you have any doubts about this, go out and purchase a DVD of some current“action”film and listen to the director’s commentary.You’ll learn how, for example, one scene in a Hollywood film which occupies just a second or two (on film) can actually take up to as much as two or three days to film (sometimes on multiple locations,no less) not to mention the introduction of a wide array of computer-generated imagery and other technological advances,many of which didn’t even exist as little as ten or fifteen years ago.
_Did you really think that was a big ship sinking in the middle of the North Atlantic in James Cameron’s classic film Titanic?
_Did you really think that real people were falling down and hurting themselves as the ship sank?
_Of course you didn’t!
_In fact, some of the most mundane moments in that wide-ranging disaster film were actually the work of clever Hollywood legerdemain.
_Even the relatively brief and simple scene of the film’s romantic duo—Kate Winslett and Leonardo DiCaprio—at the stern of the ship whenWinslett’s character is threatening to jump overboard and commit suicide involved endless hours of filming using several different stages and multiple means of technological wizardry.
_If you were among those who were caught up in the legends surrounding Crisis Actors at the Boston Marathon and the stories on the Internet purporting to analyze just a moment or two of the events that took place there, then read that preceding paragraph again—no, in fact, read it twice—and consider the ramifications . . .
_As we said—and this is critical to understand—the point is that even a moment of drama on film can take literally days to produce and simply can not be carried out in just a few split seconds.
But those Crisis Management Conspirators who have been purveying the Crisis Actors false flag to mislead truth seekers know that most people have no idea how technologically advanced film-making has become, even at the same time it remains time-consuming and requires vast participation by multiple people at various levels So, then, in the context of the events at the Boston Marathon,what does all of this mean?
_It’s very simple . . .
_If the conspirators behind the events in Boston wanted to produce a piece of film to convince unwittingAmericans that a bombing did take place which injured many people—including those who lost arms and legs—they did not have to dispatch hordes of “Crisis Actors” onto the scene to engage in complicated motions of “reacting” to a bomb and then rolling about on the crowd pretending to be injured, hysterically clinging to severed arms and legs, throwing about fake blood, etc.
_That just isn’t how it works.
_IF there HAD been a major conspiracy to "fake" all of these things, the whole process COULD (and WOULD) have been done beforehand using high-tech computer generated images produced in a laboratory.
_The so-called Crisis Actors didn't even have to be ANYWHERE NEAR the bomb site and positioned where "honest witnesses" could have seen anything suspicious such as what has been claimed to have happened.
_For serious truth seekers—particularly those who were caught up in the legend of Crisis Actors at Boston who were purportedly busy faking injuries, throwing around fake blood, detaching prosthetic legs and arms, etc—a careful review of the wide-ranging “special features” section of the DVD of James Cameron’s Titanic is well worth their time.
_And the truth is that since Cameron’s classic first appeared on the screen in 1997—16 years ago—computer technology has grown by extraordinary leaps and bounds, such that Cameron’s own remarkable visual graphics in Titanic are, in many respects, almost extraordinarily antiquated by many new developments in the field.
_In fact, the “special features” section of virtually any DVD of any motion picture or television drama—especially those involving a lot of action—often provide a literal step-by-step videographic run-down of the amazing techniques of film-making, in particular the amazing CGI—computer-generated imagery—that has become so prevalent in even the most minimal ways that the average viewer would never expect.
_For example, on the DVD of the third season of the now-defunct crime drama,Body of Proof, one can see how outdoor scenes (filmed in Los Angeles but supposedly taking place in Philadelphia) are altered via CGI to eliminate palm trees from the image that is finally seen by the television viewer. Another scene deconstructed on that DVD demonstrates how the image (and sound) of a railroad train moving through a railroad yard is completely erased by CGI, such that all of the other action (and sound) taking place remains undisturbed.
_In other words, film-making technology has reached such a highly-advanced level that:
_• Virtually any scene or event can practically be conjured out of almost thin air.What appears to be a human speaking and moving about may, in fact, be a CGI, or even a robot with a talking, smiling human face imposed by computer upon it.
_• Any piece of real film imagery can be so altered that the final version of the film completely eliminates action that did take place or altered to include action that actually took place elsewhere and was then inserted by computer onto that imagery.
_Now—when confronted with such realities about the nature of film production and how quite ridiculous it is to suggest that Crisis Actors engaged in such complex (and quite unnecessary) on-site antics in Boston—a lot of red-faced truth seekers (who do realize they have been conned) fall back on the claim that the high-level conspirators behind Boston deliberately staged faulty video presentations that were easily “refutable” because—they say—the conspirators actually wanted the American people to know that the Boston bombing was a hoax.
_The apparent underlying theme here is that “Nothing is for real.
Everything is a lie. And the people who are responsible for these lies actually do want people to know that they are lies.That the people can do nothing to combat this conspiracy that operates in tandem with the Controlled Media in America.”
_That sounds good. It has a certain appeal to a certain mindset. But it doesn’t reflect the reality that, in fact, most Americans simply do not have any idea that the Internet is rife with rumors about Crisis Actors.
_But what a growing number of Americans do believe—as a consequence f propaganda from the Controlled Media—is that those people who are called “conspiracy theorists” by the media have some really crazy ideas and that they don’t believe that there was really a shooting in Sandy Hook that took the lives of 20 little children or that there wasn’t even really a bombing in Boston.
_And many Americans now believe that anything that reeks of a conspiracy theory—even relating to the JFK assassination or the Oklahoma bombing or 9-11—is the work of paranoid minds whose opinions are to be dismissed, along with (in particular) the idea that Israel had anything to do with those tragedies.
_That was precisely the design of those who helped make the truth seekers look “crazy” by feeding them a diet of extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook and Boston that took hold on the Internet like wildfire, even as the Crisis Management Conspirators were monitoring the communication networks between patriots here in the United States (and around the world) who were disseminating these stories.
_The bottom line is that what many came to believe about Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston (along with other similar nonsense) is just one big fat fraud—a lie—a distraction—deliberately perpetrated by the Crisis Management Conspirators to make truth seekers look silly.
_The real “BIG STORY” that has not yet set in or been realized and understood is this:
_The Crowd Control (and very real Mind Control) tactics—first laid out by Cass Sunstein—have been successfully set in motion and the long-term damage to serious inquiry into very real conspiracies—past and present and those of the future—has been costly and inestimable.
_We can only imagine what will happen when another very real crisis comes along and wonder what kind of “management”—or mismanagement as the case may be—will occur.We can only ponder the manner in which truth seekers will be once again be utterly misdirected and further marginalized.
_What happened with Sandy Hook and Boston is a very real lesson America’s “alternative” media should learn from—before it’s too late.
VIDEO - Ry Gets a "Gift" in LA Alex Jones VS the German Death Cult of the Lucferian Illuminati