S'il n'a pas encore été démontré qu'il s'agit d'un assassinat politique (célébration tardive de Pourim?), il ne fait aucun doute que Chavez était férocement détesté, voire menacé de mort (s'il faut croire ses déclarations publiques à cet effet) par le pouvoir juif international et ses laquais occidentaux. Soyez attentifs à ceux et celles qui se délectent de sa mort et vous pourrez ainsi identifier plus facilement les nuisibles, à mettre hors d'état de nuire.
VIDEO - HUGO CHAVEZ (2010):”MOSSAD IS TRYING TO KILL ME.” (ANG.)
VIDEO - CHAVEZ MENACÉ PAR ISRAËL (S-T FRANÇAIS)
ISRAELVALLEY: Israël l'a détesté. le Vénézuela pleure la mort de son président Chavez
Bernard-Henri Lévy: The Idiotic Posthumous Cult of Hugo Chávez Leaving aside his anti-Semitism and his dictator allies, why would
the left celebrate a man who repressed his people and wrecked the
economy? It’s an insult to Venezuelans, says Bernard Henri-Lévy.
VIDEO - Mort d'Hugo Chavez - Une liste de chef d'Etat malade qui défie les lois de la probabilité
Chavez vient de mourir du cancer. Cristina F. Kirchner (Argentine) est atteinte d'un cancer de la thyroïde...
‘They want me dead!’ Venezuelan president claims US murder plot
Venezuelan Government Denounces the Presence of Opposition “Mercenaries”
Washington’s Secret “Five Point Plan” to Destabilize Venezuela
Chavez Fought New World Order
By Michael Collins Piper
American Free Press Newspaper
Hugo Chavez—the colorful Venezuelan strongman, a popular figure throughout Latin America—is dead.
Although
the controlled media contrived to mislead Americans into perceiving
Chavez as “anti-American,” the truth is that the bombastic South
American icon was actually a forthright nationalist critic of the
internationalist and imperialist forces often referred to as the New
World Order.
Like
many who oppose the privately-owned Federal Reserve money monopoly
which operates un-Constitutionally on American soil, Chavez was a critic
of rampant global super-capitalism, which Chavez called “the demon.”
There
is no question Chavez knew the source of his high-powered opposition.
In 2000, announcing a trip to Iraq, Chavez taunted his critics,
remarking: “Imagine what the Pharisees will say when they see me with
Saddam Hussein.” On another occasion he asserted: “The world has wealth
for all, but some minorities, the descendants of the same people that
crucified Christ, have taken over all the wealth of the world.”
All of this is something of which even otherwise well-informed American patriots are unaware.
Should
there be any doubt Chavez was perceived as a roadblock in the way of
the New World Order, consider the warnings issued by David Rothkopf,
front man at Kissinger Associates, the secretive pressure group of Henry
Kissinger, one of the foremost advocates of the New World Order.
In
Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making—which
acknowledges the influence of such New World Order institutions as
Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign
Relations—Rothkopf spoke approvingly of what he called the new global
“superclass” (that is, the New World Order elite) and said that, in his
words, the “political fault line” for the 21st century is the battle of
“Globalists vs. Nationalists,” that an emerging “global network of
antiglobalists” stood opposed to the “superclass.” He wrote:
At the core of the “anti-network”
is a small group of leaders, linked by many shared characteristics and
attitudes though they come from widely different regions of the world.
They might be characterized as “nationalists,” or opponents of the
United States, or critics of Western-led globalization. . . .
In their view, globalization is
old Western imperialism dressed up in new clothes, and they are reacting
to it much as they were trained to react to such incursions. . . .
Whether you characterize it as nationalist vs. internationalist,
populist vs. globalist, or anti-neo-imperialist vs. pro-American
globalization, the fact is that the battle lines are drawn.
Specifically naming three figures
among that “small group of leaders” challenging the New World Order as
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Russian leader Vladimir Putin and
Chavez, Rothkopf candidly confirmed the primary underlying conflict in
our world today is—as it has always been—the fight by nationalists
worldwide to preserve their nations’ sovereignty in the face of the
concerted drive by cosmopolitan internationalists to erect a global
imperium. Rothkopf’s admissions were a clear sign the New World Order
schemers recognized serious forces were aligning against them.
Unfortunately, groups such as the
John Birch Society parroted the New World Order crowd and the
war-mongering pro-Israel neo-conservatives by attacking nationalists
such as Ahmadinejad, Putin, and Chavez.
Considering all of this—quite
naturally—from the time Chavez was elected president of Venezuela in
1999, the tightly-knit interlocking network of Rothschild dynasty-linked
plutocratic families and Federal Reserve-connected financial interests
who dominate the American military-industrial-media complex never spared
any fervor in denouncing Chavez at any opportunity.
That international Zionism and
the interwoven forces of the New World Order were disturbed about Chavez
was (at first) largely kept under wraps. Zionist hatred of Chavez was
confined to small-circulation—but nonetheless influential—journals read
almost exclusively by supporters of Israel and in elitist circles.
For propaganda purposes designed
to manipulate more broad-ranging concerns of freedom-loving Americans,
the media regularly stoked up the theme Chavez was a “socialist” or a
“communist” under the thumb of Fidel Castro.
That Chavez was friendly toward
Castro as virtually all Latin American leaders—even “conservatives”—have
been (not to mention leaders worldwide)—was hardly “proof” Chavez was a
communist.
Even The New York Review of Books
admitted on Oct. 6, 2005 that “a great many businessmen have prospered
under [Chavez’s] rule, and he has made it clear he sees a significant
role for the private sector and, most particularly, for foreign
investment.” So Chavez was no “communist”—media lies notwithstanding.
In truth, Chavez modeled himself
after Simon Bolivar—liberator of the Andean colonies from the Spanish
crown—who, in even traditional American history texts, was called “the
George Washington of South America.”
The
simmering secret war against Chavez took a new turn when, on the August
22, 2005 broadcast of his 700 Club, pro-Israel television evangelist
Pat Robertson—suggesting Chavez was a new communist threat—openly called
for the United States to assassinate Chavez, then emerging as a
forceful critic of the global warmongering of the George W. Bush
administration.
Most
Americans would have never heard of Robertson’s provocation had it not
been for the big media loudly publicizing the evangelist’s remarks and,
as such, Chavez and his supporters correctly saw Robertson’s outburst as
part of a carefully-crafted high-level scheme to direct American
popular ire against Chavez and set the stage for military action against
him.
In
fact, the call for killing Chavez came just days after the Bush
administration’s foremost voice of support in the media—the
neo-conservative Weekly Standard—slammed Chavez claiming he was “a
threat to more than just his own people,” a danger to the tiny but
wealthy Jewish population in Venezuela, bemoaning the fact Venezuelan
state television speculated Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad,
may have been linked to the assassination of a local official in
Venezuela.
Asserting
“hostility to Jews” was “one of the hallmarks of the Venezuelan
government,” the Standard cited a State Department “Report on Global
Anti-Semitism” that purported to document, in the Standard’s words, “how
openly anti-Semitic the Venezeulan government now is.”
Of
particular concern was that one of Chavez’s closest advisors, the late
Norberto Ceresole, was “infamous” for “conspiracy theories about Jewish
plans to control the planet” and that Ceresole was a “holocaust
denier”—that is, he questioned official accounts of World War II
history, a “crime” punishable by imprisonment in many Western nations
calling themselves “democracies,” and which, at the same time,
hypocritically accused Chavez of suppressing freedom of expression in
Venezeula.
Within
a short time, though, Jewish opposition to Chavez went public in a big
way. On Feb. 5, 2008—in a commentary in The Washington Post (a newspaper
that most definitely directs opinion among movers and shakers in the
nation’s capital)—Abe Foxman, chief of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
of B’nai B’rith, launched a full-force attack on Chavez. Headlined
“Chavez’s Anti-Semitism,” Foxman’s inflammatory broadside alleged a
“rising wave of anti-Semitism” in Venezuela traceable to Chavez.
Foxman
charged Venezuelan officials and media were “rehashing the ancient
canard about Jewish control, vilifying Jews and Israel as agents of
imperialism, and adopting anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jewish
financial influence,” and expressed concern Chavez was friendly to
Iran’s Ahmadinejad and Syrian President al-Assad, among others the ADL
called “a verifiable threat to Israel and world Jewry.”
Although
Chavez is gone, other leaders in South America and worldwide—with the
support of many good Americans—still carry on his fight against the New
World Order.
Aller @4:40
L'empire judéo-maçonnique combat toujours le national-socialisme!
Viva Chavez! Le national-socialisme est la seule alternative à la dictature du capitalisme
Le Venezuela suspend le dialogue avec les Etats-Unis
Hitler, ce socialiste... (Le lien est vite fait, mais pas tiré par les cheveux!)
By GUSTAVO D. PEREDNIK
03/19/2013 11:39
Photo by: CARLOS GARCIA RAWLINS
Once one of the proudest and most vibrant communities in the Americas, until
1999, when Hugo Chavez, El Comandante, (as he was and is still termed by his
followers) became president, more than half of the country’s 20,000 Jews have
since emigrated, mostly to Florida, Mexico, Spain and Israel.
But the exodus from Chavez was not only Jewish. Hope, freedom and jobs all disappeared as the economy was systematically destroyed – unemployment is now almost 10 percent and inflation is a resounding 25 percent (the average in Latin America is less than 5 percent).
The private sector has been crippled by sudden and arbitrary expropriations.
Venezuela boasted some 14,000 private companies when Chavez came to power; only half of them survived him. One of the wealthiest nations on earth, Venezuela used to export a wide variety of products, but today less than 4 percent of exported goods are non-oil products. El Comandante’s blustering almost-daily appearances on radio and TV couldn’t change this grim reality. And, on top of everything, Jews had to endure his unabashed and unpredictable hatred.
Judeophobia or anti-Semitism is a European export product that never thrived in the Americas – with the possible exception of Argentina, where anti-Jewish sentiment surfaced in a novel published after the 1889 stock exchange collapse, and where Nazi-type groups have been active at times.
Until 15 years ago, an article on Judeophobia in Latin America would have focused on Argentina, without mentioning Venezuela, which was almost free of Judeophobic myths at the time. But then Chavez came onto the scene. What started as sporadic slurs, which fitted in with Chavez’s radical anti-US rhetoric, slowly but surely became government policy. And when police raided the country’s main Jewish school in November 2004, it became clear that Chavez’s Judeophobic outbursts were not incidental. Pynchas Brener, the community’s chief rabbi, called it “the first-ever direct aggression against the community.”
The pretext for the assault was the search for evidence connected to the murder of a prosecutor. Allegedly, weapons were being smuggled into the school building from a nearby shooting range. By means of this fabrication, the government created a smokescreen of paranoia to hide the cesspool into which the country was sinking.
No weapons were found at the school, and the raid only stupefied hundreds of pupils and their teachers. But the venomous stories about the eternal conspirators had started to feed the imagination of the Venezuelan people. In his Christmas message for 2005, Chavez lamented that “the descendants of the people who crucified Christ have taken over the planet’s resources.” The national television channel echoed this libretto when an entire program in January 2006, was devoted to an attack against the Jews as “owners of the media.” Chavez encouraged such programs and never had to account for this, as he didn’t have any official contact with the Jewish community. He labelled his non- Jewish opponents “wandering Jews.”
The Judeophobic threat in Latin America has indeed shifted to Venezuela, and its mask is now less nationalism or Catholicism, and more Islamism and socialism. When Chavez was awarded the Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights in Tripoli in 2004, he promptly dedicated it to Palestinan leader Yasser Arafat. Chavez’s hatred of Jews can be traced to his advisor since 1994, Norberto Ceresole, a neo-Nazi, who died in 2004. Described as “an authentic revolutionary against the Yankee-Zionist World Order,” Ceresole trained at the Soviet Union’s School for War. Upon his return to his native Argentina, he zigzagged between the extreme left (the ERP guerrilla movement) and the extreme right (a group of officers led by Colonel Aldo Rico who plotted a fascist coup). Ceresole blended both extremes in his books, “The Caudillo, The Army and The People: The Venezuelan Model or Postdemocracy” (1999), in which he advises the people to delegate all power to a national-military leader; and “National Judaism: Post-Zionist Messianism” (1997), the prologue of which was penned by his mentor, Roger Garaudy. Both were Holocaust deniers, and Ceresole took this a step further by claiming that the 1994 terror attack against the AMIA in Buenos Aires had not taken place.
In fact Jewish and Israeli targets were brutally attacked in Argentina in 1992 and 1994, precisely by Chavez’s staunch ally, Iran. More than 100 people were killed in Buenos Aires, and hundreds more were injured. It is thanks to Chavez that Iran is not ostracized by Latin America (not even by Argentina, which has just signed an agreement with the ayatollahs).
He threw open the doors of the continent to Hezbollah, Iran’s lackey. A tribe of Venezuelan Indians has since converted to Islamism and runs a website promoting its ideology.
Chavez’s revered mentor, Fidel Castro, set a precedent in 1979, when he was the first to support the Islamic Revolution in Iran. Cuba and Iran later joined forces at the UN in a bid to expel Israel. Venezuela broke off relations with the Jewish state in 2009, and Chavez went as far as to curse Israel on TV. He saw himself as a world leader who was set to vanquish the United States and the West, with the help of Islam.
Chavez’s legacy is the deep Iranian penetration in Latin America and support for Bashar Assad’s massacres in Syria.
Venezuela is Iran’s international advocate.
Chavez’s disciple, Bolivian President Evo Morales, has declared his country an “unconditional ally” of Iran. A clandestine Iranian network, similar to the one that preceded the attacks against Argentina, is currently growing throughout the length and breadth of the continent.
Violence can be expected in Venezuela in the coming months, for two main reasons: First, the country has one of the highest inflation rates in the world.
The economy is close to bankruptcy and collapse is being held off by the high price of oil. If it drops, Venezuelans will be further impoverished and turmoil will break out.
Second, Venezuela has already become one of the most violent countries on the planet. The murder rate doubled during Chavez’s reign, mainly due to corruption and the breakdown of law and order. The biggest robberies were carried out by Chavez’s supporters. Two of his brothers have acquired at least 17 ranches at knockdown prices, using concealed names. And his political allies, who have amassed fortunes from confiscated lands and enterprises, won’t allow the rule of law to replace Chavez’s legacy. Drug-dealing generals like Henry Silva Rangel, who was minister of defence, have clearly stated that the army will not allow the “Socialist revolution” to end.
If Henrique Capriles, who is of Jewish ancestry, wins the Venezuelan elections, set for April 14, the phantom of Judeophobia will be a tool in the hands of rebellious chavistas (Chavez supporters). And if he doesn’t, Venezuela is doomed to suffer further corruption and decadence.
The Israel-based author has lectured at universities in 50 countries and penned a dozen books, among them “Judeophobia” (2001) and “To Kill Without a Trace” (2009) about Iranian terror in Latin America.
But the exodus from Chavez was not only Jewish. Hope, freedom and jobs all disappeared as the economy was systematically destroyed – unemployment is now almost 10 percent and inflation is a resounding 25 percent (the average in Latin America is less than 5 percent).
The private sector has been crippled by sudden and arbitrary expropriations.
Venezuela boasted some 14,000 private companies when Chavez came to power; only half of them survived him. One of the wealthiest nations on earth, Venezuela used to export a wide variety of products, but today less than 4 percent of exported goods are non-oil products. El Comandante’s blustering almost-daily appearances on radio and TV couldn’t change this grim reality. And, on top of everything, Jews had to endure his unabashed and unpredictable hatred.
Judeophobia or anti-Semitism is a European export product that never thrived in the Americas – with the possible exception of Argentina, where anti-Jewish sentiment surfaced in a novel published after the 1889 stock exchange collapse, and where Nazi-type groups have been active at times.
Until 15 years ago, an article on Judeophobia in Latin America would have focused on Argentina, without mentioning Venezuela, which was almost free of Judeophobic myths at the time. But then Chavez came onto the scene. What started as sporadic slurs, which fitted in with Chavez’s radical anti-US rhetoric, slowly but surely became government policy. And when police raided the country’s main Jewish school in November 2004, it became clear that Chavez’s Judeophobic outbursts were not incidental. Pynchas Brener, the community’s chief rabbi, called it “the first-ever direct aggression against the community.”
The pretext for the assault was the search for evidence connected to the murder of a prosecutor. Allegedly, weapons were being smuggled into the school building from a nearby shooting range. By means of this fabrication, the government created a smokescreen of paranoia to hide the cesspool into which the country was sinking.
No weapons were found at the school, and the raid only stupefied hundreds of pupils and their teachers. But the venomous stories about the eternal conspirators had started to feed the imagination of the Venezuelan people. In his Christmas message for 2005, Chavez lamented that “the descendants of the people who crucified Christ have taken over the planet’s resources.” The national television channel echoed this libretto when an entire program in January 2006, was devoted to an attack against the Jews as “owners of the media.” Chavez encouraged such programs and never had to account for this, as he didn’t have any official contact with the Jewish community. He labelled his non- Jewish opponents “wandering Jews.”
The Judeophobic threat in Latin America has indeed shifted to Venezuela, and its mask is now less nationalism or Catholicism, and more Islamism and socialism. When Chavez was awarded the Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights in Tripoli in 2004, he promptly dedicated it to Palestinan leader Yasser Arafat. Chavez’s hatred of Jews can be traced to his advisor since 1994, Norberto Ceresole, a neo-Nazi, who died in 2004. Described as “an authentic revolutionary against the Yankee-Zionist World Order,” Ceresole trained at the Soviet Union’s School for War. Upon his return to his native Argentina, he zigzagged between the extreme left (the ERP guerrilla movement) and the extreme right (a group of officers led by Colonel Aldo Rico who plotted a fascist coup). Ceresole blended both extremes in his books, “The Caudillo, The Army and The People: The Venezuelan Model or Postdemocracy” (1999), in which he advises the people to delegate all power to a national-military leader; and “National Judaism: Post-Zionist Messianism” (1997), the prologue of which was penned by his mentor, Roger Garaudy. Both were Holocaust deniers, and Ceresole took this a step further by claiming that the 1994 terror attack against the AMIA in Buenos Aires had not taken place.
In fact Jewish and Israeli targets were brutally attacked in Argentina in 1992 and 1994, precisely by Chavez’s staunch ally, Iran. More than 100 people were killed in Buenos Aires, and hundreds more were injured. It is thanks to Chavez that Iran is not ostracized by Latin America (not even by Argentina, which has just signed an agreement with the ayatollahs).
He threw open the doors of the continent to Hezbollah, Iran’s lackey. A tribe of Venezuelan Indians has since converted to Islamism and runs a website promoting its ideology.
Chavez’s revered mentor, Fidel Castro, set a precedent in 1979, when he was the first to support the Islamic Revolution in Iran. Cuba and Iran later joined forces at the UN in a bid to expel Israel. Venezuela broke off relations with the Jewish state in 2009, and Chavez went as far as to curse Israel on TV. He saw himself as a world leader who was set to vanquish the United States and the West, with the help of Islam.
Chavez’s legacy is the deep Iranian penetration in Latin America and support for Bashar Assad’s massacres in Syria.
Venezuela is Iran’s international advocate.
Chavez’s disciple, Bolivian President Evo Morales, has declared his country an “unconditional ally” of Iran. A clandestine Iranian network, similar to the one that preceded the attacks against Argentina, is currently growing throughout the length and breadth of the continent.
Violence can be expected in Venezuela in the coming months, for two main reasons: First, the country has one of the highest inflation rates in the world.
The economy is close to bankruptcy and collapse is being held off by the high price of oil. If it drops, Venezuelans will be further impoverished and turmoil will break out.
Second, Venezuela has already become one of the most violent countries on the planet. The murder rate doubled during Chavez’s reign, mainly due to corruption and the breakdown of law and order. The biggest robberies were carried out by Chavez’s supporters. Two of his brothers have acquired at least 17 ranches at knockdown prices, using concealed names. And his political allies, who have amassed fortunes from confiscated lands and enterprises, won’t allow the rule of law to replace Chavez’s legacy. Drug-dealing generals like Henry Silva Rangel, who was minister of defence, have clearly stated that the army will not allow the “Socialist revolution” to end.
If Henrique Capriles, who is of Jewish ancestry, wins the Venezuelan elections, set for April 14, the phantom of Judeophobia will be a tool in the hands of rebellious chavistas (Chavez supporters). And if he doesn’t, Venezuela is doomed to suffer further corruption and decadence.
The Israel-based author has lectured at universities in 50 countries and penned a dozen books, among them “Judeophobia” (2001) and “To Kill Without a Trace” (2009) about Iranian terror in Latin America.
Sur ce blog:
Chavez menacé par Israël
Chavez maudit l'État juif
Chavez contre les juifs
L'ambassadeur d'Israël expulsé du Vénézuela
Chavez contre les pharisiens
Chavez: "Israël veut exterminer le peuple palestinien"
Chavez s'en prend à nouveau aux pauvres pharisiens sans défense
Chavez: "Lieberman est le patron de la mafia"
Chavez: le Vénézuela va rompre ses relations avec Israël
Trois frères: Ahmadinejad: Chavez et Kadhafi
Le jeu des comparaisons: des ressemblances entre la période actuelle et celle d'avant l'accession d'Hitler au pouvoir
Yasser Arafat, ou "Haman l'Amalécite", assassiné par le Mossad?
Pourim: l'ennemi traditionnel, grand vainqueur de la Seconde guerre mondiale
Pourim 2011 et l'attaque atlanto-sioniste en Libye
La guerre en Irak: une célébration de Pourim
Le sacrifice sanglant de Pourim 2012 à Gaza
Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg voit le nationalisme comme étant "dangereux"... mais Infowars prétend que Bilderberg a été fondé par des nazis!
Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d'un journal juif américain, soutient qu'il ne prônait pas vraiment l'assassinat d'Obama
Saint Baruch Goldstein et le massacre de la Pourim à la mosquée de Jérusalem
Vitrifier l'Iran: un devoir de mémoire
Une des raisons pourquoi ZCF (dont le site web a été volé par Prothink alias Pro-blème) est attaqué est son appui à Michael Collins Piper, que plusieurs personnes très naïves, influencées par le douteux Chris Bollyn, considèrent comme un "agent des juifs". Dès son entrée dans le mouvement de vérité, Bollyn s'est fait remarquer par sa curieuse manie à raconter des mensonges et calomnier d'authentiques chercheurs qui sont dans le combat depuis des décennies. Bollyn devait rencontrer Chavez lors de son voyage en famille au Vénézuela tous frais payé par son employeur d'alors, l'hebdomadaire nationaliste American Free Press, mais -- surprise -- il n'a même pas essayé de le rencontrer. Voir le livre de ZCF ici, dans sa version finale. La version répandue est une version non-autorisée, non-revue et non-corrigée puisque qu'elle lui a été volée.
Voir: FALSE FLAGS--TEMPLATE FOR
TERROR, Chapter 28: 9-11 and the New
Internet Paradigm: The Necessity for
High-Level Manipulation and Control of the
Dissemination of Information
(...)Many of
these operatives spent much of their time putting out what could only be
described as downright “crazy” theories about 9-11 that redirected attention
away from sober, responsible research.
In other
instances, they specialized in cranking out often-reckless theories that were
quite easily refutable, therefore giving credence to the oft-heard claim from
the mainstream media that any and all other dissident 9-11 research was just as
silly and unreliable.
And in a
number of instances, there were several 9-11 “truthers” who, while pointing the
finger of blame at Israel, were (at the same time) engaging in other activity
that led many observers to believe that these individuals were “black
propaganda” operatives trying to bring discredit to those who believed Israel
was indeed responsible for 9-11.
Two such
individuals, Christopher Bollyn and Eric Hufschmid—whom many believe were
“ringers” inserted into the 9-11 truth movement from the beginning—ingratiated
themselves with American Free Press (having pretended to be enthusiastic about
my book Final Judgment) and, over a period of time, engaged in a concerted
effort to influence AFP’s coverage of 9-11—and not in a positive way.
Ultimately
AFP discovered that while Bollyn and Hufschmid supplied a lot of “good”
information, that data was mixed in with a variety of “bad” data, the
consequence of which was that many of the stories the two generated (working
hand-in-hand on a daily basis behind the scenes for well over a year) proved to
be of rather dubious value.
At one
juncture, Bollyn and Hufschmid tried to convince the editors of AFP that
outspoken 9-11 survivor, William Rodriguez—who had been honored by 9-11 truth
seekers all over the United States and around the world for his integrity—was
some sort of “Zionist agent.”
And despite
the fact that independently wealthy American philanthropist Jimmy Walter had
bankrolled speaking engagements by both Bollyn and Hufschmid, the dynamic duo
also spread the word that Walter—who spent millions of dollars of his own money
seeking to alert the public to 9-11 truth—was also a stooge for Israeli
interests.
For my own
part, I spent an entire week in Malaysia in the company of both Rodriguez and Walter
and I never saw any sign that they were working to advance Zionist interests in
any way, shape or form.
However,
considering the record of Bollyn and Hufschmid, I think it’s safe to say that
the same thing cannot be said about them.
Considering
all of this, more than a handful of 9-11 dissidents (including many who
believed Israel was behind 9-11) ultimately came to conclude Bollyn was
actually a disinformation agent using a perverse back-handed way of
discrediting AFP and those who believed the Mossad was responsible for 9-11.
Bollyn’s
critics correctly pointed out that Bollyn had a pattern of misquoting sources,
misinterpreting scientific information, and making assertions about certain
matters without any foundational authority.
The
consequence was that Bollyn’s disinformation gave ammunition to critics of
AFP’s contention that the Mossad was behind 9-11 and as such was
enthusiastically bandied about by Zionist propagandists seeking to undermine
AFP’s thesis even though the questionable material by Bollyn focused on
scientific data that had nothing whatsoever to do with the specific matter of
Mossad involvement in 9-11.
In the end,
after their deception was unmasked, Bollyn and Hufschmid launched a smear
campaign against AFP alleging that we were, too, were really “Zionist agents” trying
to cover up Mossad involvement in 9-11, an allegation preposterous on its face
to anyone familiar with AFP’s work. Bollyn even claimed that Mark Lane—the
anti-Zionist Jewish critic of Israel who pinpointed the CIA’s role in the JFK
assassination conspiracy—was a Zionist and a secret asset of the CIA!
Unfortunately—and
not unpredictably—a few naive folks actually believed these liars, especially
people new to the 9-11 truth movement who didn’t have access to the big
picture. However, when all was said and done, the romance between Bollyn and
Hufschmid came to a bitter end and the two began accusing one another of being
Zionist agents!
And the
strange outside possibility was that both of them could actually have been
right. After all, not all Zionist agents necessarily know the identities of the
others. That’s how complex the world of intelligence intrigue happens to be.
Hufschmid’s
own website devolved into a mish-mash of weird commentary (often referencing
sexual matters, especially human interaction with animals) and once even
included a nude photograph of Hufschmid, taken from the rear, ostensibly for
the purpose of explaining some “health” matter Hufschmid felt would interest
his readers.
That
Bollyn, an American, had spent time on an Israeli kibbutz and later married an
Israeli woman—who worked for Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence
agency—was a point many found telling. That his own sister was also married to
a Jew and had taken up residence in Israel was also considered somewhat
suspicious.
It’s always
been my suspicion (based on a variety of data too complicated to delve into
here) that Bollyn was a long-standing international free-lance intelligence
operative who, for at least a substantial part of his career, was working for
the Church of England, which—although many people don’t realize it—has always
been an arm of British intelligence, active in global intrigue. In fact, Bollyn
and his family have multiple “British” connections which also point toward that
conclusion.
And,
needless to say, the British Empire—which has long been under the control of
the Rothschild Dynasty—has always played a peculiar role in advancing Jewish
and Zionist interests, even going back to the days when the woman whom Bollyn
claims as an ancestor, Anne Boleyn, was a central player in a grand design that
disrupted the traditional role of the Roman Catholic Church in Britain and set
the stage for the rise of Jewish financial power in Britain in years to come.
(And that is a story in and of itself—worthy of a book that has yet to be
written.)
But for
those who are interested, an English patriot and critic of the New World order
with an abiding interest in 9-11 truth—and who does believe Israel was a key
player in that tragedy—has put together a remarkably detailed website (complete
with a fascinating variety of links and other valuable information) which
delves into the bizarre story of Bollyn and his erstwhile friend Hufschmid. See
http://www.takeourworldback.com for more.
In any
event, all of this having been said, it’s quite clear that the circumstances surrounding
9-11 gave Israel—along with other power players on the world stage—a new
understanding of how the Internet worked and how its resources could be
utilized (for better or for worse) in manipulating global opinion.
And as a
consequence, people in high places began working to lay forth a plan to ensure
that, in the future, the Internet could be used for their own benefit and to
undercut those—such as the 9-11 dissidents and other truth-seekers who
questioned “official” stories about such matters as the JFK assassination and
the Oklahoma bombing and other matters—who stood in opposition to the New World
Order agenda.
As we shall
see, this carefully-crafted endeavor had even further consequences when the
plan was skillfully put into actual working order in the wake of the Sandy Hook
shooting in Newtown, Connecticut and the Boston Marathon bombing that followed
not long afterward.
The
Internet, as a consequence, was no longer simply a venue for truth seekers to “get
the word out” about high-level cover-ups. Instead, it became a vehicle used by
the high-level conspirators to not only confuse the work of the truth seekers
but also to combat them by discrediting them through some of the most
manipulative means possible.
It’s a
story that has never been told before, but it is a story that must be told, if
real truth seekers are going to be able to deal with the big challenges that
lie ahead, particularly when confronted with propaganda and disinformation
designed to frustrate their efforts to combat the very real forces of Evil that
lie behind the New World Order.
Let us then
move forward and examine this extraordinary conspiracy in a way that it has
never before been dissected. It’s a shocker . . .
The Piper Report 2013.03.10
Mike Piper Report.com
AFP
RBN
32k CF Download
L’IMPÉRIALISME AMÉRICAIN EST UN ENNEMI DE L’HUMANITÉ
L’impérialisme américain est un des plus grands ennemis de l’humanité
depuis au moins un siècle. Il est le vecteur principal de la
mondialisation ultralibérale à l’échelle planétaire qui entraîne le
pillage des ressources des pays du Tiers-Monde par les multinationales
ainsi que l’exploitation extrême qui est infligée à leur classe ouvrière
dans des ateliers de misère. En alliance étroite et ferme avec le
sionisme international, l’impérialisme américain cherche à soumettre
sans pitié les peuples qui luttent pour leur indépendance nationale et à
détruire progressivement les différentes nations et cultures au profit
d’un monde uniformisé et dominé par la civilisation anglo-saxonne.
Plus récemment cette année il y a eu le 11ème anniversaire des attentats du 11septembre 2001. Ce fût bien entendu une tragédie qui a coûté la vie à environ 3000 personnes, sans compter les blessés et nous devons de tout coeur compatir à leur sort. Ceci dit le cortège de lamentations dans les médias au service de l’oligarchie mondialiste qui a suivi ces attentats est parfaitement hypocrite et révoltant. La version officielle de ces évènements est loin d’être convaincante et crédible et ne peut que semer le doute dans nos esprits. Il est tout à fait légitime de se demander à qui ce crime a profité. Mais dès que l’on remet en doute la version officielle des attentats du 11 septembre 2001, les défenseurs du système capitaliste apatride et mondialiste s’élèvent en choeur pour nous traiter de conspirationnistes, antisémites, esprits paranoïaques, etc. Leur volonté d’intimidation est plus qu’évidente, car nous risquons de semer des doutes dans la population et ainsi ébranler le pouvoir immense et démesuré qu’ils exercent sur la conscience des gens.
Ces esprits moralisateurs, qui nous ressassent continuellement le même refrain sur le terrorisme islamiste, deviennent par contre silencieux devant les actes de terrorisme d’État perpétrés par les puissances occidentales depuis plus d’un siècle. La liste est très longue et nous pourrions commencer par les bombardements intensifs anglo-américains sur l’Allemagne pendant la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale, qui ont entraîné notamment la destruction de la ville de Dresde. Des centaines de milliers de civils allemands périrent dans le but de provoquer la capitulation totale du gouvernement allemand. Mais bien sûr c’étaient des victimes « collatérales » et les Allemands étant du « mauvais côté » lors de ce conflit mondial et représentant le « mal suprême », ont mérité leur sort! Le peuple allemand a été littéralement mis à genoux pour les crimes supposés ou réels qui étaient reprochés au régime national-socialiste, alors que les alliés Américains, Britanniques et Soviétiques en ont perpétrés une panoplie et ont eu les mains couvertes de sang. Il y a eu également les bombardements atomiques d’Hiroshima et Nagasaki en 1945, le coup d’État de Suharto en Indonésie en 1965 et celui de Pinochet au Chili en 1973, tout deux financés et orchestrés par la CIA, la guerre du Vietnam, l’invasion du Panama en 1989 qui causé la mort de plus de 3000 personnes, etc. Plus près de nous il y a eu les bombardements israéliens sur les territoires palestiniens et le Liban, l’invasion de l’Afghanistan, de l’Irak et de la Libye l’année dernière. Toutes ces guerres et agressions impérialistes ont causé un nombre de morts infiniment plus grand que les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 sans pour autant suscité l’indignation des médias contrôlés par l’oligarchie mondialiste. Toujours le même deux poids deux mesures! La vie des civils américains et israéliens a plus de valeur que celle des habitants des pays dont les dirigeants s’opposent tant bien que mal à l’hégémonie de l’empire américano-sioniste, que ce soit les Palestiniens, les Irakiens, les Libyens, les Syriens, etc.
Suite à la destruction des tours du World Trade Center, l’élite dirigeante sioniste américaine a joué la carte de la sympathie auprès de l’opinion publique mondiale et en a profité pour mousser au maximum la fièvre belliciste et militariste en déclenchant la guerre contre l’Afghanistan, soi-disant pour débusquer Oussama Ben Laden et pour renverser le régime des Talibans au nom de la « libération des femmes ». Beaucoup de patriotes américains ont tout de suite reconnu l’influence du lobby pro-Israël dans cette poussée guerrière. Il y avait, et il y a toujours, une réelle volonté de la part des idéologues néoconservateurs de l’administration Bush, et maintenant celle d’Obama, de renforcer la position de l’État sioniste au Moyen-Orient au détriment des régimes arabes, iranien et autres qui veulent conserver leur indépendance nationale face à l’empire américano-sioniste. La convergence de vues entre l’impérialisme américain et le sionisme international a atteint un point extrême et c’est ce qui alarme les patriotes américains qui souhaitent que leur gouvernement se consacrent aux problèmes domestiques plutôt que de jouer au gendarme planétaire.
Aussitôt après la guerre en Afghanistan, les néconservateurs sionistes se lancèrent à l’assaut de l’Irak baathiste et socialiste de Saddam Hussein sous de faux prétextes et qui précipitèrent ce pays dans le plus grand chaos et dans une guerre civile atroce. Ils conclurent même des alliances avec les islamistes qu’ils prétendaient combattre! Saddam Hussein malgré tout ce qu’on peut lui reprocher était un dirigeant laïc, patriotique et socialiste et son gouvernement comprenait des femmes et des chrétiens. Le mouvement d’opposition à cette guerre fût extrêmement large avec des millions de personnes dans les rues, dont une manifestation de 200 000 personnes en mars 2003 dans les rues de Montréal, l’une des plus grande manifestation politique de l’histoire du Québec et du Canada! Mais ceci n’empêcha pas la destruction de la souveraineté irakienne et le pillage éhonté des ressources naturelles de ce pays par l’oligarchie mondialiste. La guerre en Libye en 2011 a été menée sous le prétexte de renverser un dictateur, Mouammar Khadafi, et a mené encore une fois au chaos et au pillage des ressources naturelles dont regorge ce pays.
Cependant il existe des lueurs d’espoir qui sont loin d’être négligeables. Cuba socialiste résiste toujours fièrement à la volonté américaine de renverser son gouvernement pour y restaurer le règne des exploiteurs et des bandits et le Vénézuéla d’Hugo Chavez représente une épine dans le pied des États-Unis qui ont toujours considéré l’Amérique Latine comme leur chasse gardée. En ce moment la Syrie baathiste et socialiste de Bachar El-Assad est au centre de l’actualité depuis plus d’un an à cause de la guerre civile encouragée et entretenue par l’OTAN dans le but de renverser son gouvernement et de le remplacer par une clique entièrement dévouée et soumise à l’hégémonie américano-israélienne sur le Moyen-Orient. L’existence du mouvement indépendantiste québécois inquiète l’impérialisme américain qui le voit comme un facteur de déstabilisation en Amérique du Nord. Dans les années 70, l’oligarchie yankee brandissait le spectre de l’avènement d’un Cuba du Nord si le Québec se séparait. C’est ce qui explique la volonté constante du Parti Québécois de rassurer les investisseurs américains sur les conséquences de l’indépendance du Québec, mais ce souci est loin d’être partagé par l’ensemble des patriotes québécois qui voient plutôt l’impérialisme américain comme un adversaire de leur lutte d’émancipation nationale et sociale. En bref il y a beaucoup de résistances face aux agressions et aux diktats impérialistes du Nouvel Ordre Mondial et les socialistes nationaux ont le devoir de les soutenir dans le but de favoriser la chute du capitalime mondialisé et apatride. C’est ainsi que l’on pourra construire un système politique, économique et social basé sur le socialisme national, seule alternative au chaos mondialiste et à la destruction progressive des nations et des identités nationales.
Plus récemment cette année il y a eu le 11ème anniversaire des attentats du 11septembre 2001. Ce fût bien entendu une tragédie qui a coûté la vie à environ 3000 personnes, sans compter les blessés et nous devons de tout coeur compatir à leur sort. Ceci dit le cortège de lamentations dans les médias au service de l’oligarchie mondialiste qui a suivi ces attentats est parfaitement hypocrite et révoltant. La version officielle de ces évènements est loin d’être convaincante et crédible et ne peut que semer le doute dans nos esprits. Il est tout à fait légitime de se demander à qui ce crime a profité. Mais dès que l’on remet en doute la version officielle des attentats du 11 septembre 2001, les défenseurs du système capitaliste apatride et mondialiste s’élèvent en choeur pour nous traiter de conspirationnistes, antisémites, esprits paranoïaques, etc. Leur volonté d’intimidation est plus qu’évidente, car nous risquons de semer des doutes dans la population et ainsi ébranler le pouvoir immense et démesuré qu’ils exercent sur la conscience des gens.
Ces esprits moralisateurs, qui nous ressassent continuellement le même refrain sur le terrorisme islamiste, deviennent par contre silencieux devant les actes de terrorisme d’État perpétrés par les puissances occidentales depuis plus d’un siècle. La liste est très longue et nous pourrions commencer par les bombardements intensifs anglo-américains sur l’Allemagne pendant la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale, qui ont entraîné notamment la destruction de la ville de Dresde. Des centaines de milliers de civils allemands périrent dans le but de provoquer la capitulation totale du gouvernement allemand. Mais bien sûr c’étaient des victimes « collatérales » et les Allemands étant du « mauvais côté » lors de ce conflit mondial et représentant le « mal suprême », ont mérité leur sort! Le peuple allemand a été littéralement mis à genoux pour les crimes supposés ou réels qui étaient reprochés au régime national-socialiste, alors que les alliés Américains, Britanniques et Soviétiques en ont perpétrés une panoplie et ont eu les mains couvertes de sang. Il y a eu également les bombardements atomiques d’Hiroshima et Nagasaki en 1945, le coup d’État de Suharto en Indonésie en 1965 et celui de Pinochet au Chili en 1973, tout deux financés et orchestrés par la CIA, la guerre du Vietnam, l’invasion du Panama en 1989 qui causé la mort de plus de 3000 personnes, etc. Plus près de nous il y a eu les bombardements israéliens sur les territoires palestiniens et le Liban, l’invasion de l’Afghanistan, de l’Irak et de la Libye l’année dernière. Toutes ces guerres et agressions impérialistes ont causé un nombre de morts infiniment plus grand que les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 sans pour autant suscité l’indignation des médias contrôlés par l’oligarchie mondialiste. Toujours le même deux poids deux mesures! La vie des civils américains et israéliens a plus de valeur que celle des habitants des pays dont les dirigeants s’opposent tant bien que mal à l’hégémonie de l’empire américano-sioniste, que ce soit les Palestiniens, les Irakiens, les Libyens, les Syriens, etc.
Suite à la destruction des tours du World Trade Center, l’élite dirigeante sioniste américaine a joué la carte de la sympathie auprès de l’opinion publique mondiale et en a profité pour mousser au maximum la fièvre belliciste et militariste en déclenchant la guerre contre l’Afghanistan, soi-disant pour débusquer Oussama Ben Laden et pour renverser le régime des Talibans au nom de la « libération des femmes ». Beaucoup de patriotes américains ont tout de suite reconnu l’influence du lobby pro-Israël dans cette poussée guerrière. Il y avait, et il y a toujours, une réelle volonté de la part des idéologues néoconservateurs de l’administration Bush, et maintenant celle d’Obama, de renforcer la position de l’État sioniste au Moyen-Orient au détriment des régimes arabes, iranien et autres qui veulent conserver leur indépendance nationale face à l’empire américano-sioniste. La convergence de vues entre l’impérialisme américain et le sionisme international a atteint un point extrême et c’est ce qui alarme les patriotes américains qui souhaitent que leur gouvernement se consacrent aux problèmes domestiques plutôt que de jouer au gendarme planétaire.
Aussitôt après la guerre en Afghanistan, les néconservateurs sionistes se lancèrent à l’assaut de l’Irak baathiste et socialiste de Saddam Hussein sous de faux prétextes et qui précipitèrent ce pays dans le plus grand chaos et dans une guerre civile atroce. Ils conclurent même des alliances avec les islamistes qu’ils prétendaient combattre! Saddam Hussein malgré tout ce qu’on peut lui reprocher était un dirigeant laïc, patriotique et socialiste et son gouvernement comprenait des femmes et des chrétiens. Le mouvement d’opposition à cette guerre fût extrêmement large avec des millions de personnes dans les rues, dont une manifestation de 200 000 personnes en mars 2003 dans les rues de Montréal, l’une des plus grande manifestation politique de l’histoire du Québec et du Canada! Mais ceci n’empêcha pas la destruction de la souveraineté irakienne et le pillage éhonté des ressources naturelles de ce pays par l’oligarchie mondialiste. La guerre en Libye en 2011 a été menée sous le prétexte de renverser un dictateur, Mouammar Khadafi, et a mené encore une fois au chaos et au pillage des ressources naturelles dont regorge ce pays.
Cependant il existe des lueurs d’espoir qui sont loin d’être négligeables. Cuba socialiste résiste toujours fièrement à la volonté américaine de renverser son gouvernement pour y restaurer le règne des exploiteurs et des bandits et le Vénézuéla d’Hugo Chavez représente une épine dans le pied des États-Unis qui ont toujours considéré l’Amérique Latine comme leur chasse gardée. En ce moment la Syrie baathiste et socialiste de Bachar El-Assad est au centre de l’actualité depuis plus d’un an à cause de la guerre civile encouragée et entretenue par l’OTAN dans le but de renverser son gouvernement et de le remplacer par une clique entièrement dévouée et soumise à l’hégémonie américano-israélienne sur le Moyen-Orient. L’existence du mouvement indépendantiste québécois inquiète l’impérialisme américain qui le voit comme un facteur de déstabilisation en Amérique du Nord. Dans les années 70, l’oligarchie yankee brandissait le spectre de l’avènement d’un Cuba du Nord si le Québec se séparait. C’est ce qui explique la volonté constante du Parti Québécois de rassurer les investisseurs américains sur les conséquences de l’indépendance du Québec, mais ce souci est loin d’être partagé par l’ensemble des patriotes québécois qui voient plutôt l’impérialisme américain comme un adversaire de leur lutte d’émancipation nationale et sociale. En bref il y a beaucoup de résistances face aux agressions et aux diktats impérialistes du Nouvel Ordre Mondial et les socialistes nationaux ont le devoir de les soutenir dans le but de favoriser la chute du capitalime mondialisé et apatride. C’est ainsi que l’on pourra construire un système politique, économique et social basé sur le socialisme national, seule alternative au chaos mondialiste et à la destruction progressive des nations et des identités nationales.
