mercredi 24 février 2010

B'Nai Brith Canada (Frank Dimant) donne un A+ au gouvernement Harper

La raison est que B'Nai Brith ne veut pas d'un juge honnête et impartial dans le conflit israélo-palestinien et que Harper a un parti pris sioniste convaincu.

De plus, Frank Dimant félicite Harper d'avoir nommé autant de chrétiens sionistes dans son gouvernement.

Rappel: Accès à l'information - Un F pour le gouvernement Harper






Harper récompensé par B'Nai Brith International



VIDEO - Le Canada Sous Influence du lobby judéo sioniste


VIDEO - La doctrine Harper: Israël à la vie à la mort

Droits et Démocratie sous la botte du régime sioniste de Harper

Harper et la criminalisation de la "critique excessive" d'Israël

Le premier sinistre Stephen Harper et les Juifs


The War Party - The Zionist Influence on NeoCon Foreign Policy(BBC)

Vendre la Guerre aux Américains - War Made Easy (V.F.)

FRONTLINE - Israel's Next War ? (PBS) They do not believe in peace talks. They do not want to share the land. They are well armed and are carrying out increasingly violent attacks, even targeting innocent civilians. They are members of Israel's militant far right, and they are threatening to become Israel's next big problem

Massacre at the Mosque - Baruch Goldstein's massacre at the Mosque of Jerusalem (Michael A. Hoffman II)

Vanunu et l'arsenal nucléaire secret d'Israel (BBC)

Le lobby d'Israel - The influence of AIPAC on US Foreign Policy (V.F.)

Inside Britain's Israel Lobby

Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some People Dislike Jews

The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled

Legal Repression in Germany-Germar Rudolf's Story

The Great Holocaust Trial : Ernst Zündel's 1st trial, Toronto, 1984/85

Jewish Supremacism Audiobook

A Holocaust Inquiry, by David Duke (chapt.12 from "Jewish Supremacism")

lundi 22 février 2010

Jim Traficant en entrevue à l'émission d'Alex Jones



VIDEO - James Traficant on Alex Jones Tv 1/5: AIPAC Runs America's Foreign Policy!
2/5: AIPAC Run...
3/5: AIPAC Run...
4/5: AIPAC Run...
5/5: AIPAC Run...

Hero Jim Traficant Files For Ohio Congressional Run

James Traficant Files to Run for Congress as Independent

Traficant: pourquoi les espions de l'AIPAC n'ont-ils pas subi le même traitement que moi?

Traficant contre les banquiers internationaux

The War Party - The Zionist Influence on NeoCon Foreign Policy(BBC)

Vendre la Guerre aux Américains - War Made Easy (V.F.)

FRONTLINE - Israel's Next War ? (PBS) They do not believe in peace talks. They do not want to share the land. They are well armed and are carrying out increasingly violent attacks, even targeting innocent civilians. They are members of Israel's militant far right, and they are threatening to become Israel's next big problem

Massacre at the Mosque - Baruch Goldstein's massacre at the Mosque of Jerusalem (Michael A. Hoffman II)

Vanunu et l'arsenal nucléaire secret d'Israel (BBC)

Le lobby d'Israel - The influence of AIPAC on US Foreign Policy (V.F.)

Inside Britain's Israel Lobby

Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some People Dislike Jews

The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled

Legal Repression in Germany-Germar Rudolf's Story

The Great Holocaust Trial : Ernst Zündel's 1st trial, Toronto, 1984/85

Jewish Supremacism Audiobook

A Holocaust Inquiry, by David Duke (chapt.12 from "Jewish Supremacism")

samedi 20 février 2010

Israël engagé dans la répression de la société civile mondiale

Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark
With the advent of anti-feudalism, and most importantly the success of the American Revolution, elites were no longer able to dominate information with the edge of a blade or the barrel of a gun. The establishment of Democracies (and Democratic Republics), with their philosophy of open government and rule by the people, compelled Aristocratic minorities to plot more subtle ways of obstructing the truth and thus maintaining their hold over the world without exposing themselves to retribution from the masses. Thus, the complex art of disinformation was born. The technique, the “magic” of the lie, was refined and perfected. The mechanics of the human mind and the human soul became an endless obsession for the elites.





La nouvelle stratégie d’Israël : « saboter » et « attaquer » le mouvement pour une justice globale

Dans une série extraordinaire d’articles, de rapports et d’exposés, l’influent Institut israélien Reut a identifié le mouvement pour une justice globale, l’égalité et la paix comme une "menace existentielle" pour Israël, écrit Ali Abunimah.

Vendredi 19 Février 2010

Dans cette présentation, l’Institut Reut demandé à Israël d’ "attaquer les catalyseurs" - les militants dans le monde pour la paix et la justice
Dans cette présentation, l’Institut Reut demandé à Israël d’ "attaquer les catalyseurs" - les militants dans le monde pour la paix et la justice

L’institut Reut a demandé au gouvernement israélien de consacrer des ressources substantielles pour « attaquer » voire "saboter" ce mouvement de manière criminelle dans ce que Reut appelle, les "pôles" internationaux de Londres, Madrid, Toronto, la baie de San Francisco et au-delà.

D’après les analyses de l’institut Reut, la doctrine stratégique israélienne traditionnelle - considérant que les menaces pour l’existence de l’État doivent être traitées par des moyens principalement militaires et ainsi combattues - est terriblement dépassée. Israël est plutôt confronté aujourd’hui à la double menace d’un "réseau de résistance" et "d’un réseau de délégitimisation."

Le réseau de résistance est composé de groupes politiques armés comme le Hamas et le Hezbollah qui "s’appuient sur des moyens militaires pour saboter tout geste visant à influer sur la séparation entre Israël et les Palestiniens ou à obtenir une solution à deux Etats" ("The Delegitimization Challenge : Creating a Political Firewall, Reut Institute, 14 février 2010).

En outre, le "réseau de résistance", vise prétendument à provoquer l’"implosion" politique d’Israël — à la façon de l’Afrique du Sud, de l’Allemagne de l’Est ou de l’Union soviétique — plutôt que d’obtenir une défaite militaire par un affrontement direct sur le champ de bataille.

Le "réseau de délégitimisation" — que le président de l’Institut Reut, Gidi Grinstein, ancien conseiller auprès du gouvernement israélien, désigne de manière provocante comme une "alliance impie" avec le réseau de résistance — est constitué du vaste mouvement, décentralisé et informel pour la paix et la justice, les droits humains et le BDS (boycott, désinvestissement et sanctions) regroupant des militants partout dans le monde. Ses manifestations incluent des protestations contre les visites de responsables israéliens dans les universités, la semaine de l’Apartheid israélien, l’activisme des institutions confessionnelles et syndicales, et "la guerre juridique" — par le recours à la compétence universelle pour cibler les présumés criminels de guerre israéliens. L’institut Reut a même cité mon discours à la conférence sur le BDS organisée par les étudiants du Hampshire College en novembre dernier comme guide sur la façon dont la stratégie de "délégitimisation" est censée fonctionner ("Eroding Israel’s Legitimacy in the International Arena," Institut Reut, 28 janvier 2010).

L’"attaque" combinée des "résistants" et des,"délégitimateurs" dit Reut, "a une importance stratégique, et peut devenir une menace existentielle globale dans quelques années."

Il avertit en outre que le "présage d’une telle menace serait l’effondrement de la solution à deux Etats, accord-cadre pour la résolution du conflit israélo-palestinien, ainsi que le regroupement derrière une ’solution à un Etat’ comme nouveau cadre alternatif."

Au niveau de base, l’analyse de Reut représente un progrès par rapport aux couches plus primitives et jusqu’ici dominantes de la pensée stratégique israélienne ; elle montre que l’on comprend, comme je l’ai dit dans mon discours à Hampshire, que "le sionisme ne peut pas simplement bombarder, enlever, assassiner, expulser, démolir, coloniser, mentir et arriver à se faire légitimer et accepter."

Mais ce qui sous-tend l’analyse de l’institut Reut est son incapacité totale à démêler les causes et les effets. Elle semble supposer que l’érosion spectaculaire de la réputation internationale d’Israël depuis ses guerres contre le Liban en 2006 et contre Gaza en 2009 est le résultat des prouesses du" réseau de délégitimisation" auquel il impute des objectifs totalement infâmes , sournois et malsains — à savoir, la "destruction d’Israël."

Elle blâme les "délégitimateurs" et les "résistants" de l’échec de la solution à deux Etats sans tenir compte de l’impitoyable et inexorable colonisation israélienne— appuyée par pratiquement tous les organes de l’État — délibérée et destinée à rendre impossible le retrait israélien de Cisjordanie.

L’analyse n’a jamais considéré, un seul instant, que l’escalade des critiques visant les actions israéliennes pourrait être justifiée, ou que ceux qui viennent gonfler les rangs des gens qui sont prêts à consacrer leur temps et leurs efforts pour s’opposer aux actions d’Israël puissent être motivés par une indignation sincère et le désir de voir se concrétiser la justice, l’égalité et la fin des effusions de sang. En d’autres mots, Israël est en train de se délégitimer lui-même.

Reut n’a pas recommandé au cabinet israélien — qui a récemment tenu une session extraordinaire afin d’entendre un exposé des conclusions du groupe de réflexion — qu’Israël change effectivement son comportement envers les Palestiniens et les Libanais. Il ne comprend pas que l’apartheid sud-africain a également été confronté à un « réseau de délégitimisation » mondial, mais que celui-ci a maintenant complétement disparu. Et pourtant, l’Afrique du Sud, existe toujours. Une fois que la cause motivant le mouvement a disparu - l’injustice de l’apartheid officiel — les gens ont abandonné leurs panneaux et leurs campagnes BDS et sont rentrés chez eux.

(JPG)
Manifestation massive à Lille, le 19 janvier 2009, contre l’attaque israélienne sur Gaza.

Au lieu de cela, Reut recommande au gouvernement israélien une contre-offensive agressive et éventuellement criminelle. Dans sa présentation powerpoint faite à la récente Conférence d’Herzliya sur la sécurité nationale israélienne, Grinstein invite effectivement les "services de renseignement " israéliens à se concentrer sur les « pôles » nommés ou non du" réseau de délégitimisation " et d’ "attaquer les catalyseurs" de ce réseau. Dans son document "The Delegitimization Challenge : Creating a Political Firewall " Reut recommande qu’ "Israël sabote les catalyseurs du réseau ».

L’utilisation du mot "sabotage" est particulièrement frappante et devrait attirer l’attention des gouvernements, des services juridiques et des directeurs d’université préoccupés par la sécurité et la protection de leurs étudiants et de leurs citoyens. La seule définition de "sabotage" dans le droit des USA le qualifie d’acte de guerre au même titre que la trahison lorsque qu’il est mené contre les USA. En outre, dans l’usage courant, l’American Heritage Dictionary définit le sabotage comme "un acte déloyal visant à faire échouer ou à entraver une cause ou un projet ; subversion délibérée." Il est difficile d’imaginer une utilisation légitime de ce terme dans un contexte politique ou dans des campagnes de sensibilisation.

À tout le moins, Reut semble demander aux services d’espionnage israéliens de mener des actions clandestines pour s’ingérer dans l’exercice de la liberté d’expression, d’association et de soutien, aux USA, au Canada et dans les pays de l’Union européenne, et éventuellement pour nuire à des personnes et des organisations. Ces mises en garde concernant les intentions éventuelles d’Israël — surtout à la lumière de sa longue histoire d’activités criminelles sur sol étranger — ne devraient pas être prises à la légère.

L’Institute Reut, basé à Tel-Aviv, lève un montant important de fonds exonérés d’impôts aux USA par le biais de sa branche sans but lucratif appelée "Les Amis étasuniens de l’Institut Reut" (AFRI). Selon ses documents publics, l’AFRI a envoyé près de 2 millions de dollars à l’Institut Reut en 2006 et 2007.

Outre une campagne internationale de sabotage sous les auspices de l’État, Reut a également recommandé une politique "douce". Celle-ci fait appel spécifiquement à la hasbara, ou propagande d’Etat, pour donner une image verte d’Israël, refuge high-tech des technologies environnementales et des produits culturels de haut niveau — ce qu’il appelle la "marque Israël."

D’autres éléments comprennent "le maintien de milliers de relations personnelles avec des élites et des personnes influentes du monde politique, culturel, dans celui des médias et de la sécurité à travers le monde et la « mise à contribution » encore plus étroite à sa cause « des communautés juives et israéliennes de la diaspora ». Il a même souligné qu’Israël devrait utiliser "l’aide internationale" pour renforcer son image (son incursion de pure forme dans le tremblement de terre d’Haïti illustre cette tactique).

Le point commun de ces stratégies est qu’elles visent à décourager, retarder et détourner l’attention de la question fondamentale : tout en se prétendant un État libéral et démocratique, Israël est une ethnocratie ultranationaliste qui s’appuie sur la répression violente des droits les plus fondamentaux de millions de Palestiniens, qui seront bientôt en majorité démographique, afin de maintenir le statu quo. Dans la nouvelle stratégie de Reut on ne change pas de jeu.

Reut ne se rend apparemment pas compte de l’ironie qu’il y a à essayer de réformer la "Marque Israël" en quelque chose de confortable, tout en recommandant publiquement que les espions israéliens tristement célèbres "sabotent" les groupes pacifistes sur le sol étranger.

Il y a deux leçons dont nous devons tenir compte : l’analyse de Reut prouve l’efficacité de la stratégie BDS, et comme les élites israéliennes craignent de plus en plus pour les perspectives à long terme du projet sioniste , elles risquent d’être plus impitoyables, plus dénuées de scrupules et plus désespérées que jamais.







Ali Abunimah est co-fondateur de l’Electronic Intifada et l’auteur de : One Country : A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse.

(JPG) Ali Abunimah est cofondateur de The Electronic Intifada et l’auteur de One Country : A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse (Metropolitan Books, 2006).

The Electronic Intifada - Cet article peut être consulté ici :

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/ar...
Traduction : Anne-Marie Goossens
http://www.info-palestine.net

La pression monte sur Israël pour qu'elle s'explique sur le rôle du Mossad dans l'assassinat du chef militaire du Hamas à Dubaï

La tête du Mossad est réclamée par les autorités de Dubaï.


Israel ne confirme pas et ne nie pas non plus le rôle du Mossad dans l'assassinat, ils disent juste qu'il y a "pas de preuves"... (Le Mossad est fort, il se fait pas prendre facilement!)

Mais seul Israel a le motif d'assassiner le chef militaire du Hamas. Pas les British, ni les Irlandais. Peut-être que les services secrets british ont été de la partie dans l'assassinat et peut-être qu'ils font l'hypocrite en accusant Israel et en demandant des explications, menaçant même de couper les ponts avec le Mossad.

VIDEO - Israeli Mossad Assassination footage in Dubai HotelVIDEO - POLICE CONFIRMS ISRAELI MOSSAD WAS BEHIND MURDER IN DUBAI HOTEL
VIDEO - Israeli Mossad steals identities and murders Palestinian leader
VIDEO - Mossad was behind murder Mabhoh The senior Hamas commander in Dubai hotel
VIDEO - News Analysis: Mossad Dubai Assassination (part 1) - (part 2)
VIDEO - LES MEURTRIERS DU MOSSAD ONT ENCORE FRAPPÉ !
VIDEO - Israel's Mossad in spotlight after Hamas murder
VIDEO - Israeli murders using fake passports of Europeans, lets now go back to 911


Français.

Meurtre d'un cadre du Hamas: Londres enquête, Israël maintient le flou sur son rôle

Meurtre/Hamas: Londres enquête, des députés souhaitent qu'Israël s'explique

Rien ne prouve l'implication du Mossad à Dubaï, selon Lieberman

Israël sur la sellette
Faux passeports, déguisements, engins sophistiqués: l'assassinat d'un cadre du Hamas à Dubaï a tous les éléments d'un
La Grande-Bretagne a lancé hier une «enquête exhaustive» sur l'usurpation d'identité des Britanniques vivant en Israël.

Les médias britanniques s'en prennent au Mossad israélien

» Le Mossad et un assassinat à Dubaï | Richard Hétu

Meurtre d'un cadre du Hamas: Israël espère éviter une crise avec Londres

La nouvelle mission du Mossad: restaurer l'image d'Israël à Dubaï

Israël joue sur « l'absence de preuves » dans le meurtre de Mabhouh

Meurtre d'un chef du Hamas: la pression monte sur Israël, qui se tait

Dubaï veut l'arrestation du chef du Mossad,"Israël" s'en moque

La gaffe du Mossad plonge Israël dans l'embarras

Le Mossad piégé par son meurtre

Dubaï veut l'arrestation du chef du Mossad si le service est impliqué

Assassinat à Dubaï d'un chef du Hamas - Le Mossad est mis en cause

Assassinat de Dubaï - Les caractéristiques d’une opération israélienne classique

Les escadrons de la mort du Mossad en Europe

Complot du Mossad - L’envoyé d'Israël "doit expliquer" les accusations d’assassinat

Le complot du Mossad - Le passeport pour la vérité à Dubaï reste secret

Interpol publie les photos des assassins d’Al-Mabhouh pour les arrêter


Anglais.

Why Israel will never confirm or deny role in assassination

UK 'invites' Israeli envoy for talk In the worst-case scenario, he speculated, the British may threaten to cut off intelligence cooperation with Israel unless the Mossad gives them a list of other British nationals whose passports may have been usurped.

Uruknet: Israeli assassinations: passports to kill - Our government seems to be fine with letting the Israeli secret service wage its war with

Hamas under a British flag

UK Telegraph
: Mossad's licence to kill - The killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh bears the hallmarks of the ruthless Israeli intelligence service. One of the leading chroniclers of the agency gives a unique insight into its methods.
WRH's webmaster comments:The Mossad team that murdered Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was using phony passports.
After Dubai hit, Israelis question Mossad methods

Mossad is supposed to gather intelligence, not sow death

Israel Has ‘Policy of Ambiguity’ Over Dubai Killing; Mossad In Hot Seat Six of the men are Britons who immigrated to the Zionist entity. The seventh is an American Israeli, whose name Dubai said was on a German passport used by one of the assassins.

Israel says no proof it carried out Hamas Dubai killing (C'est bien connu que le pays qui a le plus de raisons de vouloir tuer le chef militaire du Hamas, c'est l'Irlande! Délire!)

Dubai assassination identity thefts threaten links with Israel Britain summoned the Israeli Ambassador to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office yesterday, and Gordon Brown promised a full inquiry into the use of fake British passports by a suspected Mossad hit squad.

U.K., Ireland to Israel envoys: Explain identity theft in Dubai killing
Israeli officials: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh assassination could spawn a serious diplomatic rift with Great Britain.

TIMES: British investigate ID theft by 'Mossad' hit squad in Dubai

The long arm of Israel must be amputated Gilad Atzmon

Dubai hit exposed Hamas' soft belly

Israel: Nothing links us to Mabhouh - UK, Ireland envoys have “nothing to add”; France, Germany demand explanations.

'Dubai hit squad stole my identity': British man's name used by assassins who executed senior Hamas leader

Terror of innocent Britons named as assassins: Why choose us, ask Britons whose identities were stolen by Mossad hit squad

‘Mossad assassination squad used British passports’

At least five Israelis 'share names with Dubai hit squad suspects'

A Mossad-style execution in Dubai

Five Israelis wake up as named 'Dubai assassins'

The tide in Britain turns against Israel (Gilad Atzmon)

Names of Mossad Death Squad Published

Did Britain know about Mossad hit? Israeli agent claims MI6 was tipped off

Britain 'knew Mossad was using fake passports for Dubai hit'

MI6 was 'notified' about Mossad assassination plot in Dubai

Dubai wants head of Mossad arrested over Hamas assassination

Soul-searching within Israel at 'amateurish' operation Officials thought to be embarrassed by series of clues left behind by Mossad agents

Israeli agents go on PR offensive

Israeli envoys in four countries were called in to meet with Foreign Ministry officials over the use of fake passports by a hit squad believed to be from the Mossad


20 fev 2010
New evidence reportedly points to Mossad's role in Dubai murder

Dubai hit squad may have used diplomatic passports

'Fake Identity' Brits Warned Their Lives Are In Danger

'Netanyahu authorized Dubai assassination'

Netanyahu Gave Personal Approval For Dubai Assassination - Times Online


Israel Goes Rogue

From identity theft to war crimes – is there anything the Israelis won't do?

by Justin Raimondo, February 19, 2010

When is the world going to finally decide Israel has gone too far – and do something about it?

When Israel invaded and retained the occupied territories, imposing a regime that resembles the old South African apartheid system, the world looked the other way – after all, beleaguered Israel was fighting for its survival, and, besides that, peace talks were underway. The daily grinding down of the Palestinians could be accepted as a temporary and even necessary evil as long as there was some sort of vague expiration date attached to the arrangement.

When it began to look like peace might be just a pipedream, and the Israelis continued sponsoring invasive "settlements" to cement their conquest, the world looked the other way. After all, everybody knew Netanyahu had to deal with an increasingly right-wing Israeli electorate, and his government could fall apart at any moment: no one expected President Obama to get tough with Tel Aviv anyway, and so no one was too surprised when the US caved on the settlements issue.

The bombing and continued blockade of Gaza, the barbaric invasions of Lebanon, and the continuing refusal to correct the widespread human rights violations documented in the Goldstone report – all of this has darkened Israel’s image considerably, even among its staunch supporters. On account of this record, Israel is now widely considered a "rogue" nation, at least outside the US. One of the major reasons for this shift in perception has to do with the wide-ranging activities of the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service.

With a fearsome reputation for ruthlessness second only to the old KGB, the Israeli intelligence services are known for their boldness and their buccaneering tactics. This was once a public relations advantage: their raid on Entebbe was made into a successful movie for a reason. From rescuing hostages, however, the Mossad has lately gone in for assassinations on foreign soil, most recently in Dubai, where they offed Hamas military commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.

This is nothing new for the Israelis: picking off their enemies on foreign soil is a longtime favorite sport of the Mossad. The innovation that’s got Israel’s allies in an uproar, however, is a relatively new weapon in the Mossad’s arsenal: identity theft. As the Telegraph reports:

"Ministers are understood to be furious that an alleged hit squad which murdered a Hamas leader in Dubai last month cloned the passports of six unsuspecting Britons, who are now living in fear of reprisals.

"Israel, which has not denied involvement in the murder, had previously promised that Mossad, its secret intelligence service, would never use British passports to help its agents carry out covert operations."

The six are all British citizens living in Israel, where the Mossad had full access to their essential documents: they simply cloned the passports and sent their agents into Dubai. There the Israelis reportedly assembled quite a contingent, as many as 18, enough to qualify the effort as a full-scale military operation. In effect, the Israelis carried out a mini-invasion of Dubai, a fact not lost on the Emirate authorities.

Interpol has posted the photos of the eleven (so far) known suspects, and issued a statement, including the following:

"Since INTERPOL has reason to believe that the suspects linked to this murder have stolen the identities of real people, the Red Notices specify that the names used were aliases used to commit murder. INTERPOL has officially made public the photos and the names fraudulently used on the passports in order to limit the ability of accused murderers from traveling freely using the same false passports."

If any institution embodies that vague abstraction known as "the international community," then surely it is Interpol, which coordinates the capture of transnational criminal gangs – sex traffickers, drug lords, and, yes, Mossad assassins. That they see Israel’s intelligence agency as an obstacle in their task of limiting "the ability of accused murderers from traveling freely" speaks volumes about the degree to which Israel has truly crossed the line.

This isn’t exactly an innovation on the part of the Israelis: in New Zealand, you’ll recall, they had a large-scale passport "farm" in operation a few years ago. Their agents would identify someone completely disabled, or otherwise unlikely to travel abroad, and – unbeknownst to the victim — apply for a passport in their name. When discovered, the Israelis denied everything, but the cops had the goods and the trial of the Israeli spies was front page news for weeks. The New Zealanders all but broke off diplomatic relations with Israel over the matter, and the Israelis, while never admitting anything, made apologetic noises while the issue – mostly ignored by the Western media outside New Zealand — faded into obscurity.

Now it has arisen once again, but this time in a far more serious context: this isn’t inconsequential-albeit-lovely New Zealand but Britain, France, Germany, Ireland, and possibly other Western nations who have had their passport systems violated. However, the worst of it is that the Mossad has apparently taken to "farming" the passports of Israelis who hold dual citizenships. According to Ha’aretz: "Five Israelis who hold dual citizenship in Britain and Germany and whose names were on some of the passports denied any connection with the Dubai death."

If Israel’s intelligence services are now "farming" the passports of those numerous Israelis who hold dual citizenship, then the passport system – the key to maintaining security in the age of terrorism – is no longer reliable or even functional. Israel is a multi-national "nation," one created by a state-sponsored effort to get people the world over to move there, and many retain citizenship in their country of origin. The US doesn’t compile statistics on dual citizenship, but the number who hold dual Israeli and US citizenship is substantial: they are now all at risk of having their identities stolen by a covert army of assassins.

There’s just one way to solve this growing problem, and that is to ban all dual citizenship, and ask Americans to choose. Yes, there’s a Supreme Court decision standing in the way, but if it requires a constitutional amendment, then so be it. At a time when maintaining the integrity of our passport system is key to preventing terrorist attacks on our territory and against our citizens abroad, it’s worth taking the trouble to patch up this gaping hole in our national security.

That Israel has gone this far in its international campaign of murder and intimidation ought to motivate the civilized nations of the world to unite in protest. The government of Dubai is petitioning to have the head of the Mossad arrested for murder, and, come to think of it, issuing a warrant might not be such a bad idea. With a foreign minister who is the Israeli equivalent of David Duke, and a foreign policy that owes much to the Klingons, Israel, which is veering off into Asiatic despotism, needs to be pulled back toward the West. The way to do that is not to offer the Jewish state unconditional support, no matter how potty and self-destructive its policies may be, but to offer the kind of "tough love" that can bring it back into the Western orbit.

We can’t afford to look away anymore: Israel has massively compromised the security of international travel, and has brought this on itself. Now is the time for the US and other Western countries to rein in their client state gone rogue – before it’s too late.



Mise à jour 3 mai 2010:
Un chef du Hamas abattu par l'armée israélienne

Opérations de terrorisme sous faux pavillon (false flag) admis par les gouvernements

Ce n'est plus une théorie du complot si le gouvernement admet son rôle dans ces attaques.


mondialisation.ca

Western Governments admit Carrying out "False Flag" Terror
(...)
  • The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president
  • Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
  • The well-respected former Indonesian president admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
  • As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings*

There are many other instances of false flag attacks used throughout history proven by the historical evidence. See this, this and this. The above are only some examples of governments admitting to using false flag terror.

You can't call it a conspiracy theory when the government itself admits it.(...)

"Une attaque contre Israël serait une attaque contre le Canada" soutient un minister canadien

Ottawa minister: 'An attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada'


Pourquoi ne pas remplacer toutes nos belles statues en sol canadien par cette splendide sculpture représentant merveilleusement le subversion sioniste de notre pays?

http://www.alterinfo.net/photo/1892175-2592217.jpg?v=1266502651





ZIOFASCISM.NET:

Ziofascism.net Scoops all Canadian Media

Kent has a Lot of Practice Grovelling to J-wish Billionaires


‘An attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada’

The newest Minister of Foreign Affairs has just made Isr-el part of Canadian territory… or was it Isr-el annexing Canada? Where have we heard that before?


Peter Mackay
“A threat on Israel means a threat on Canada”
-Peter MacKay, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Conservative Party of Canada
Source: YNet News October 30, 2006
Canadian Foreign minister Peter MacKay delivered a pro-Israel speech several days ago at a Bonds Gala event in Montreal. MacKay made it clear that a threat on Israel meant a threat on Canada in his speech at an event honoring Canadian businessman Ralph Benatar, one of Canada’s veteran leaders of the North American Jewish community. (read the rest)

jeudi 11 février 2010

Le Mossad a assassiné plus de 530 scientifiques irakiens

Mossad murdered 530 Iraqi scientists

By Special Report
Aljazeera
Tuesday, May 9, 2006

Assassinations of Iraq academics in Iraq never existed prior to April 2003.

Numerous reports for many months have stated that with collaboration from American occupation forces, Israel's espionage apparatus, Mossad, slaughtered at least 530 Iraqi scientists and academic professors.

Assassinations of Iraq academics in Iraq never existed prior to April 2003. Persistent Israeli hit squads against Iraqi scientists had been active in Iraq since April 2003, but the latest chapter was uncovered on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 by the Palestine Information Center which, citing a report compiled by the United States Department of State and intended for the American President, stated that Israeli and foreign agents sent by Mossad, in cooperation with United States, to Iraq, killed at least 350 Iraqi scientists and more than 200 university professors and academic personalities .

According to the report, which was referred to the U.S. president George W. Bush, Mossad agents had been operating in Iraq with the aim of liquidating Iraqi nuclear and biology scientists, among other scientists, and prominent university professors.

That was after the U.S. failed to persuade those scientists to cooperate with or work for it.

"Israeli commandos had been operating on Iraqi territory for more than a year, the focus of their activities being the assassination of Iraqi scientists and intellectuals. The Zionists resorted to the large-scale assassination campaign after the failure of American efforts that started immediately after the American occupation of Iraq, aimed at attracting a number of Iraqi scientists to cooperate and go to work in the United States, The Palestine Information Center quoted the report as saying.

"Some Iraqi scientists were forced to work in American research centers; however, the majority of them refused to cooperate in certain fields and fled the U.S. to other countries", it further stated.

The Pentagon agreed with the suggestion of Mossad, which believed that the best way to get rid of those scientists was to "physically eliminate them".

The American security service provided Israel with complete biographies on the Iraqi scientists and academics to facilitate killing them, the report said, adding that the Mossad campaign targeting Iraqi scientists is still underway.

Below is a presentation by Dr Ismail Jalili titled Plight of Iraqi Academics, in which he details Mossad crimes against the Iraqi scientists.

The presentation was made during Madrid International Conference on the Assassinations of Iraqi Academics on 23-24 April 2006.

Dr. Jalili notes that:

* Many assassination attempts resulted in the death of other family members and escorts which have not been included or referred to in this study.

* Multiple assassination attempts are ongoing.

* Repeated threats to life are made to force people to leave Iraq.

* Considerable numbers of threats to life go unreported.

* In the last week of April 2006, a mass campaign was reported in Mosul of threats to doctors calling on them to leave Iraq.

* Assassinations of Iraq academics is a new phenomena in Iraq, that never existed prior to April 2003.

* The pattern indicates a sinister campaign and motives.

* The assassinations, kidnaps and threats to life forcing academics and doctors to leave Iraq do not follow any religious or sectarian pattern.

*The only dominant pattern is that the absolute majority of victims are ethnically Arabs.

The presentation affirms the following:

* The defence of Iraqi academics and medical professionals should begin by condemning the illegal war and occupation that created the situation in Iraq where assassinations are endemic and go unpunished.

* Occupying powers and their collaborators are responsible for the protection of the lives of Iraqi civilians and imputable under international law for the failure to do so.

* The assassination of Iraqi academics and health professionals is part of a conscious attempt to prevent Iraq from regaining its just independent and sovereign status.

* Defending Iraqi academics and health professionals is not separate from the necessity of being in solidarity with the Iraqi people and their national anti-occupation movement.

* Iraqis, like all people, have a right to science and education and to enjoy the inalienable rights of freedom of thought, expression, research and innovation.

* The right of families of assassinated health professionals and academics to have the killing of their loved ones investigated by an independent and competent body, and compensation paid, must be assured in all cases.

* Delegates who attended the seminar reaffirmed their commitment to work with determination to raise at all levels the issue of the criminal destruction of Iraq's professional and intellectual wealth.

In particular, delegations committed to:

* Demand that UNESCO act in defence of Iraq's intellectuals and professionals.

* Demand that the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights fulfill its duty to protect the lives and human rights of Iraqi doctors and academics, and all Iraqi civilians.

* Spread awareness of the issue of the assassination of Iraqi academics and doctors with the appreciated commitment of Autonomous University.

* Madrid to transmit the key concerns of this campaign to Spanish universities, the International Federation of Universities and the Association of Arab Universities of the Arab League.

* Call upon the world's media to understand that the killing of Iraqi academics and health professionals is a result of the occupation, not sectarian civil war.

* Continue working to build an international solidarity campaign linking Iraqi academics in exile and in Iraq with their peers in universities worldwide.

* Press national and regional parliaments to raise and discuss the criminal destruction of Iraq's intellectual and professional class.


The undersigned affirm that they will continue to cooperate in their denunciation of the occupation and its numberless crimes and always stand in solidarity with the people of Iraq.




Who is behind the Assassinations of Iraq's Brains ?

Plaintes et poursuites irakiennes déposées contre les USA et la G-B

Pire que Madoff: le vol de plus de 125 milliards de dollars destinés à la reconstruction de l'Irak

Uranium appauvri: le génocide irakien

The War Party

Bush a confié à Chirac: "Il faut envahir l'Irak pour empêcher les invasion de Gog et Magog"

L'ère messianique reaganienne

Du meurtre du Christ au conflit des civilisations

mercredi 10 février 2010

Nouveau vidéo de David Duke sur le contrôle des médias


Do Jews Control the Media -- The LA Times Says Yes!


Un survivant de l'Holocauste considère qu'un antisémite est en fait "une personne que les Juifs haïssent".



The War Party - The Zionist Influence on NeoCon Foreign Policy(BBC)

Vendre la Guerre aux Américains - War Made Easy (V.F.)

FRONTLINE - Israel's Next War ? (PBS) They do not believe in peace talks. They do not want to share the land. They are well armed and are carrying out increasingly violent attacks, even targeting innocent civilians. They are members of Israel's militant far right, and they are threatening to become Israel's next big problem

Massacre at the Mosque - Baruch Goldstein's massacre at the Mosque of Jerusalem (Michael A. Hoffman II)

Vanunu et l'arsenal nucléaire secret d'Israel (BBC)

Le lobby d'Israel - The influence of AIPAC on US Foreign Policy (V.F.)

Inside Britain's Israel Lobby

Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some People Dislike Jews

The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled

Legal Repression in Germany-Germar Rudolf's Story

The Great Holocaust Trial : Ernst Zündel's 1st trial, Toronto, 1984/85

Jewish Supremacism Audiobook

A Holocaust Inquiry, by David Duke (chapt.12 from "Jewish Supremacism")

Lady Renouf à la télévision iranienne

Elle explique le pouvoir et l'influence mondial du sionisme. Entrevue en trois parties.







Conférence de Lady Renouf à Téhéran


LES ROTHSCHILD (V.F.)


Finkelstein-Renouf Debate: Teheran Holocaust Conference

Le sionisme secret d'Asher Ginsberg

Michael Hoffman explique la figure d'Amalek, ennemi immémorial du peuple juif

Entrevue avec Michael Collins Piper sur son nouveau livre The New Babylon

La nouvelle Babylone

Des usuriers babyloniens à l'empire Rothschild

La pourriture Rothschild: The Great Red Dragon

Lady Renouf parle du premier état juif: le Birobidjan

Pourquoi certains juifs préfèrent vivre en Sibérie plutôt qu’en Israël
http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/local/cache-vignettes/L250xH187/arton3460-72cc1.jpg

Qu'est-ce que le judaïsme?

Diffamation

La secte

La matrice

Holocauste à Gaza 2009: Bilan


The War Party - The Zionist Influence on NeoCon Foreign Policy(BBC)

FRONTLINE - Israel's Next War ? (PBS)
They do not believe in peace talks. They do not want to share the land. They are well armed and are carrying out increasingly violent attacks, even targeting innocent civilians. They are members of Israel's militant far right, and they are threatening to become Israel's next big problem

Massacre at the Mosque - Baruch Goldstein's massacre at the Mosque of Jerusalem
(Michael A. Hoffman II)

Nuclear Secrets-Vanunu and the Bomb (BBC)

The Israel lobby - The influence of AIPAC on US Foreign Policy

Inside Britain's Israel Lobby

Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some People Dislike Jews

The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled

Legal Repression in Germany-Germar Rudolf's Story

The Great Holocaust Trial : Ernst Zündel's 1st trial, Toronto, 1984/85

Jews, Communism and Civil rights (chapt.4 from "Jewish Supremacism")

Jewish Media Supremacy (chapt.5 from "Jewish Supremacism")

Terrorism Against America (Chapt.11 from Jewish Supremacism)

A Holocaust Inquiry, by David Duke (chapt.12 from "Jewish Supremacism")


Lady Renouf: Mideast Peace Solution in SE Russia
By Lady Michèle Renouf

In the July 5 issue of AMERICAN FREE PRESS Paul Craig Roberts, the former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury, writing after the Israeli lobby’s backbiting against veteran journalist Helen Thomas, insisted he did “not want Israel destroyed.” Whereas Mrs. Thomas suggested returning Israeli Jews to their old European haunts, Roberts made what he called the “rhetorical . . . proposal to relocate Israelis in the U.S.” Yet neither has been willing to state the obvious: Israel at no time had any moral right to exist in Palestine.
The living criminal blueprint for The Jewish State was drawn up by Theodor Herzl in 1895 when Adolf Hitler was aged 6, and World War II was half a century away, and therefore irrelevant to the plan.
As it happens there is a real, rather than rhetorical, alternative homeland option where the world’s Jews could relocate in perfect safety. Here their security wall would be optional rather than a self-fulfilling credal projection of their anti-gentile identity. A homeland which has never provoked desperate suicide bombings or rocket attacks, since its creation did not involve mythic impostures of “God-given” privileged real estate, the genocidal blueprint for piracy of other people’s ancestral land or their credally “authorized” displacement to besieged refugee camps.
The founding of this homeland predated Israel by two decades. This Jewish republic (in all but name) is the size of Switzerland. It still exists, and Yiddish is its first official language. What is officially called the Jewish Autonomous Region, though generally referred to by the name of its capital city Birobidjan, is located on Russia’s south-eastern border with China. It was created in 1928 during the early days of the former Soviet Union and formalized in 1934.
I have had the opportunity to speak about Birobidjan on two occasions this year in very different though equally prestigious venues. These venues each owe their best ethics essentially to the classical Greek scientific attitude.
This first was before the House of Lords in London, mother of Parliaments, which still purveys the aura of centuries-old sovereign tradition, though sadly Israeli-occupied territory for the past century and a half.
By contrast, the Iranian presidential headquarters in Teheran is today the principal target of predatory Israeli envy and aggression against the success of the Khomeini revolution, which made Iran’s economy and foreign policy off limits to international “greed is good” oriented usurers.
On each occasion my public interventions on this subject were carefully monitored and commented on by the Community Security Trust (CST), the private army and intelligence organization of England’s Jewish community.
The CST was set up in 1994 by jailbird tycoon Gerald Ronson, the archetypal Jewish “hard man,” who previously co-founded the “62 Group,” a thuggish gang specializing in brutal attacks on anti-Israelis in London and around the UK.
Earlier this year the CST found it “troubling” to note that I “was speaking to a meeting at the House of Lords, where her proposal was greeted with applause . . . to promote her campaign to have Jews relocate en masse to Birobidjan, a Jewish autonomous region established in the eastern Soviet Union by Stalin in 1934.”
A few months later they were even more concerned, noting my impromptu address to a thousand international delegates gathered at President Ahmadinejad’s Teheran headquarters during the Fourth International Conference on Imam Khomeini and Foreign Policy, organized by the Iranian Institute for Political and International Studies.
I used this invitation to propose, directly to President Ahmadinejad, Birobidjan as a home for Israel’s Jews: A ready-made common sense option and just conclusion to the rogue criminal occupation of Palestine.
My hope is that our singularly upstanding President Ahmadinejad, who speaks the whole political truth bravely, will promote awareness of the first Jewish homeland and that there is no need for European Ashkenazim Jews to go back to Germany, Poland or Austria when they have their own state whose first language is Yiddish.
The CST warned its supporters: “Ahmadinejad’s response to Renouf’s plea is not known. But if the Iranian president does, at some point in the future, propose deporting Israeli Jews to Birobidjan, you will know where he heard it first.”
So let me tell you, dear doughty readers of AFP, eye-ball to eyeball, the dauntless Iranian president said in English, “you and me, we see it the same.”
That may be because Khomeini’s ongoing successful morale re-armament revolution is surprisingly like the keynote of the courageous Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson’s plea that without historical truth there can be no international justice, and that “historical truth goes by evidence, not by emotion.” #

ONG israéliennes menacées par la police de la pensée sioniste

En Israël, les défenseurs des droits de l'homme redoutent une 'chasse aux sorcières'

Hier, 20h24


Les intéressés parlent de climat de 'chasse aux sorcières', et Gideon Levy, éditorialiste franc-tireur du quotidien Haaretz, n'hésite pas à dénoncer l'orientation 'maccarthyste' du mouvement Im Tirtzu. Se drapant dans la défense des 'valeurs du sionisme', celui-ci a lancé une violente campagne contre le New Israel Fund (Nouveau fonds israélien, NIV), une fondation qui finance les principales organisations de défense des droits de l'homme israéliennes, et sa présidente, le professeur Naomi Chazan.

Selon Im Tirtzu, qui a reçu le puissant soutien du quotidien populaire Maariv, le NIV finance les seize organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) qui ont fourni '92 % des références négatives' contenues dans le rapport du juge sud-africain Richard Goldstone, lequel accuse Israël d'avoir commis des 'crimes de guerre' lors de la guerre de Gaza de décembre 2008-janvier 2009. Connu pour son orientation d'extrême droite, Im Tirtzu est proche des milieux évangélistes américains.

Il vient d'obtenir une première victoire : Naomi Chazan, qui était depuis dix ans une éditorialiste respectée du Jerusalem Post, a reçu un courriel lui annonçant que sa collaboration était terminée. Mais la confrontation n'est pas finie : à la Knesset, le Parlement israélien, plusieurs députés mènent une offensive brutale, qualifiant les ONG visées de 'traîtres' appartenant à une 'cinquième colonne'.

Une proposition de création de commission d'enquête parlementaire a été déposée, dont le but serait de dévoiler les sources de financement du New Israel Fund. Celui-ci, qui a été créé en 1979, a son siège à Washington. Il reçoit des donations des milieux juifs américains, et a versé depuis sa création plus de 200 millions de dollars à de très nombreuses organisations partageant des idéaux de démocratie et de justice sociale.

On compte parmi elles B'Tselem, Breaking the Silence, l'Association pour les droits civiques en Israël, le Comité public contre la torture, Médecins pour les droits de l'homme, Yesh Din, Adalah, Hamoked, etc., soit les principales organisations qui défendent les droits des Palestiniens, donnent la parole aux soldats israéliens muselés par la censure militaire et, d'une manière générale, mènent le combat de la liberté d'expression.... lire la suite de l'article sur Le Monde.fr


Israeli human rights groups face state repression

Quand le Proche-Orient crée une crise politique au Canada

L'ONG canadienne Droits et Démocratie sous la botte du régime sioniste-conservateur de Stephen Harper

mardi 9 février 2010

Le NY Times était déjà biaisé en faveur d'Israël bien avant que le fils de l'éditeur en chef fasse son service militaire en Israël

Le journaliste du NYT Thomas Friedman et la rédaction critiquent autant Israël que les Palestiniens, mais se voient comme des supporteurs d'Israël, et ultimement, supporteraient la sécurité d'Israël au détriment des droits des Palestiniens.

L'éditeur actuel du NYT est Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., un membre de la famille [juive] qui contrôle le journal depuis 1896.

La fortune familiale des Sulzberger s'élève à plus de 450 million$.

Le quotidien français Le Monde [Bronfman-Rothschild] publie chaque semaine une sélection d'articles du New York Times en version originale.



Un survivant de l'Holocauste considère qu'un antisémite est en fait "une personne que les Juifs haïssent".


The NY Times' coverage of Israel-Palestine was Biased Before Bureau Chief's Son Joined the IDF

Lysandra Ohrstrom

This week the editors of The New York Times's sprang to the defense of Jerusalem Bureau Chief Ethan Bronner following weeks of controversy over his son's service in the Israeli Defense Forces. Public editor Clark Hoyt praised Bronner's track-record at the Times, in his February 6th column but nonetheless concluded that "covering Israel's conflict with a son in uniform might be cause to reassign even a superb reporter." The Times' Executive Editor Bill Keller said in a response that "the editors discussed the situation and sees no reason to change Bronner's status as bureau chief."

Let's get somethings straight. Ethan Bronner is not and never has been a "superb reporter" and there are plenty of reasons why he should not be allowed to run the Times' biggest Middle Eastern bureau, let alone commit blatant anti-journalistic acts on behalf of the "paper of record"--the last of which is his son's military service. No other reporter has turned the paper of record into a mouthpiece for the Israeli occupation more than Ethan Bronner and that is quite an accomplishment for a publication that so consistently represents one party's agenda.

There are too many inaccurate assertions in either of these letters to address in a single blog post, but what's most troubling to me is that both Hoyt and Keller appear to believe in Bronner's, and the Times', objectivity: "Bronner occupies one of journalism's hottest seats, covering the intractable conflict between Israelis and Palestinians," Hoyt wrote. "As the top correspondent for America's most influential newspaper, everything he writes is examined microscopically for signs of bias."

First of all, I object to the characterization of the conflict as "intractable" but that's a minor infraction on the spectrum of editorial infractions. You don't have to be a journalist, editor, or Middle Eastern scholar to find signs of biases in Bronner's coverage. Nor does one have to examine it microscopically. Just type in his byline in the search box of the Times' website and glance at the first twenty headlines that appear and it's obvious where Bronner's sympathies lie. Almost every substantial story is told from the perspective of Israelis: "Israel Nears Membership in Economic Club," from January 19; "For Israel, Mixed Feelings on Aid Effort," published on January 22; "Israel Prepares Rebuttal to the Goldstone Report," from January 23.

Bronner himself told Hoyt that he "would rather be judged by his work than his biography," so a signs of bias take a look at the latter story on what he characterizes as Israel's campaign to "dispel the [Goldstone] report's harsh conclusion -- that the death of noncombatants and destruction of civilian infrastructure were part of an official plan to terrorize the Palestinian population."

In September a United Nations fact-finding mission released a 575-page report of massive war crimes committed by Israel and to a lesser extent Hamas during the 2008 war in Gaza. Bronner did not cover Goldstone's findings for the times in September, but devoted 1,200 words to Israel's rebuttal on January 23.

"The rebuttal will be given to United Nations officials in the coming weeks and its contents will remain under wraps until then," he wrote. "But officers involved in writing the report gave some details."

He proceeds to quote at least seven different Israeli sources and not a single Palestinian or independent human rights group about the details of a document he presumable has not read. The sources refute a few of the specific findings related to infrastructure damage detailed by the commission, but mentions the gravest alleged breaches at the heart of the report, only in passing.

For instance, Bronner makes no mention of the mortar attack on a mosque during prayer service that killed 15 people, but allows an anonymous source to defend itself against the report's minor charges, such as the destruction of a flour mill and chicken coops. "The mission finds that the conduct of Israeli armed forces constitute grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention in respect of wilful killings and wilfully causing great suffering to protected persons and as such give rise to individual criminal responsibility," the executive summary of the Goldstone report said.

Rubble and destruction were the most minor consequences of the war, but you'd never know that from reading Bronner's account. The Times in general, and Bronner in particular, have a long history of burying the plight of individual Palestinians under the rubble in service of furthering a one-sided narrative of the conflict.

Bronner's objectivity deserves to be questioned and If his son's military service is the impetus for readers to look deeper into the news they consumer and the interests driving it, so be it. By pretending to engage in a discussion about journalistic objectivity, Keller and Hoyt made it blatantly obvious that readers cannot rely on editors for a balanced news diet.

"It's not just that we value the expertise and integrity of a journalist who has covered this most difficult of stories extraordinarily well for more than a quarter century," Keller wrote in a response to Hoyt. "It's not just that we are reluctant to capitulate to the more savage partisans who make that assignment so difficult -- and who make the fairmindedness of a correspondent like Ethan so precious and courageous."









Dieu merci l'analyste sioniste du NY Times William Safire nous a quitté

Enquêter sur Goldman Sachs serait antisémite

Traîtres inhumains dans les bureaux du New York Times

New York Times: "Éduquer le Hamas en infligeant la souffrance à la population"

Chabad Lubavitch & The New York Times