samedi 24 septembre 2011

Rare témoignage du policier qui a procédé à l'arrestation des "Israéliens dansants" du 11 septembre


VIDEO - 9-11 Cop Who Arrested Dancing Israelis Speaks



Le policier responsable de l'arrestation
des "Israéliens dansants" du 9-11, en entrevue
exclusive pour American Free Press

par Dave Gahary
American Free Press
23 septembre 2011

Scott DeCarlo

L'officier de police du New Jersey responsable de la capture de cinq Israéliens qui étaient en train de filmer et célébrer alors que les tours du World Trade Center étaient en train de brûler, a rompu son silence et convenu d'une entrevue exclusive pour American Free Press le 16 septembre.

Les lecteurs d'AFP le savent sans doute, ce sont les mêmes Israéliens qui travaillaient pour Urban Moving Systems, une société écran du Mossad qui se trouve au coeur de l'implication israélienne dans les attentats du 11 septembre.

Le sergent Scott DeCarlo n'a jamais parlé aux médias au sujet de cette journée, à l'exception de deux apparitions de 30 secondes dans des vidéos sur Internet provenant de sources indéterminées. En fait, DeCarlo a confirmé que c'est la première et la dernière entrevue qu'il acceptera jamais d'accorder à ce sujet.

DeCarlo a révélé à AFP des détails cachés sur les événements du 11 septembre que les médias auraient dû mettre en lumière il y a 10 ans, sans parler de leur silence quasi-total en ce qui concerne l'implication d'Israël.

Même s'il n'était pas supposé travailler ce jour-là, de DeCarlo a quand même été appelé en service et "affecté à l'autoroute" pour prévenir la circulation d'entrer dans New York.

"Il avait reçu l'ordre "BOLO", c'est-à-dire "soyez à l'affût (Be On the Look Out) d'une camionnette particulière, peut-être chargée d'explosifs", a expliqué DeCarlo, "qui était peut-être sur le point de détruire le pont George Washington."

DeCarlo a expliqué: «Elle [la camionnette suspecte] était en train de venir vers nous, et j'ai saisi mon sergent [DeCarlo lui-même était patrouilleur à l'époque] et dit:« Hé, mec, c'est notre camionnette. «Ce n'était pas exactement la plaque d'immatriculation qu'on cherchait car un chiffre ne concordait pas, mais j'ai dit: "Ça doit être elle, elle est trop similaire".

Il a poursuivi: «La camionnette était en train de sortir du Turnpike [du NJ] (fameuse autoroute à péage) et essayaient de prendre la Route 3. La circulation allait à deux miles à l'heure, donc nous nous sommes approchés à pieds en face de la camionnette, armes au poing, et elle s'est arrêtée. "

Les cinq espions israéliens ont tous refusé de sortir du véhicule, alors DeCarlo a été contraint de recourir à la force.

"Nous leur avons demandé de sortir de la camionnette, mais ils ne nous ont pas écouté", a-t-il dit. "Donc, nous. . . leur avons passé les menottes et l'avons fait aussi vite que possible."

AFP a demandé à DeCarlo pourquoi, selon lui, les Israéliens ont refusé de suivre ses ordres. DeCarlo était incertain, mais il a demandé à l'auteur, "avez-vous déjà eu une arme pointée sur la tête?"

DeCarlo a ensuite décrit ce qui s'est passé après avoir traîné les espions hors de leur camionnette. «Quand nous leur avons traîné hors de la voiture, l'un des gars, plutôt bavard, a déclaré: «Nous ne sommes pas vos ennemis, nous sommes votre ami. Nos ennemis sont vos ennemis,» a déclaré DeCarlo. "A ce moment, ils ont dit qu'ils venaient d'Israël. Ils répétaient: "Hé, nous sommes de votre côté."

«Nous les avons mis dans des cellules de détention du police de l'État du New Jersey situées dans le Meadowlands Stadium, et c'est la dernière fois que je les ai vus", a-t-il dit. Peu après, le FBI aurait pris le relais. Les cinq Israéliens ont été détenus pendant 10 semaines, mais ont finalement été expulsé en Israël sur des accusations de violation des lois d'immigration. En novembre 2001, ils sont apparus à un talk-show de télévision israélienne pour parler du fait qu'ils ont été envoyés aux États-Unis "pour documenter l'événement."

Le sergent DeCarlo a demandé à AFP de demander aux parties intéressées de ne pas communiquer avec lui.




AUDIO - 9-11 Cop Who Arrested Dancing Israelis Speaks

Scott DeCarlo
AFP PODCAST -
In the first ever interview of its kind, AMERICAN FREE PRESS speaks with the police officer responsible for arresting the “Dancing Israelis” on September 11, 2001, who were caught filming and celebrating while the WTC burned and people died. Sgt. Scott DeCarlo reveals the details of that day, details the Zionist-controlled mainstream media conveniently overlooked. DeCarlo has promised that this is his first and last interview on the subject, in the hopes of quelling ongoing interest in his role that horrible day.





9-11 Cop Who Arrested The "Dancing Israelis" Breaks Silence
Scott DeCarlo
By Dave Gahary -
The New Jersey police officer responsible for capturing five Israelis who filmed and celebrated while the World Trade Center towers burned has broken his silence, agreeing to a Sept. 16 exclusive interview with AMERICAN FREE PRESS.
As AFP readers are no doubt aware, these are the same Israelis who were working under the direction of Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front company at the center of Israeli involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.
Sgt. Scott DeCarlo has never spoken to the media about the details of that day except for two 30-second cameo appearances in Internet videos from undetermined sources. In fact, DeCarlo confirmed that this is the first, and last, interview he will ever grant in regard to this subject.
DeCarlo revealed to AFP hidden details about the events of 9-11 that mainstream media venues should have uncovered 10 years ago, if not for their near-total blackout of meaningful coverage where Israel is concerned.
Although not scheduled to work that day, DeCarlo reported anyway and “was posted on the highway” to prevent traffic from entering New York City.
“There was a BOLO, which is a ‘Be On the Look Out’ for a particular van, perhaps loaded with explosives,” explained DeCarlo, “that may have been on its way to destroy the George Washington Bridge.”
DeCarlo explained: “It [the suspicious van] happened to come our way, and I grabbed my sergeant [DeCarlo himself was a patrolman at that time] and said: ‘Hey, man, that’s our van.’ It wasn’t the exact license plate given reported—it was off by one numeral—but I said: ‘That’s gotta be it; it’s just too close.’”
He continued: “The van was coming off the [N.J.] Turnpike trying to get on Route 3. Traffic was rolling at two miles an hour, so we got in front of the van on foot, weapons drawn, and stopped it.”
All five of the Israeli spies refused to exit their vehicle, so DeCarlo was forced to get physical.
“We asked them to get out of the van, but they didn’t listen,” he said. “So, we . . . put them in handcuffs and did it as quickly as possible.”
AFP asked DeCarlo why he thought the Israelis refused to follow his orders. DeCarlo was unsure, but asked this writer, “You ever have a gun pointed at your head?”
DeCarlo then described what happened after the spies were dragged from their van. “When we removed them, one of the guys that was rather chatty said: ‘We’re not your enemy, we’re your friend. Our enemies are your enemies,’” DeCarlo said. “At that point they said they were from Israel. They kept saying, ‘Hey, we’re on your side.’”
“We brought them over to the New Jersey State Police holding cells in the Meadowlands Stadium, and that’s the last I saw of them,” he said. Shortly after that, the FBI reportedly took over. The five Israelis were held for 10 weeks, but were eventually deported to Israel on charges of immigration violations. In November 2001, they appeared on an Israeli TV talk show discussing how they were in the U.S. “to document the event.”
Sgt. DeCarlo asked AFP to request interested parties not to contact him.





VIDEO - PressTV Mark Glenn "Israeli agents filmed 911 destruction"


FALSE FLAGS: Template for Terror, by Michael Collins Piper

 CHAPTER NINETEEN


The Dancing Israelis
Who Celebrated on 9-11

Immediately after the 9-11 attacks, CBS anchor Dan Rather appeared on David Letterman’s late night program and declared, in a voice dripping with outrage and disgust, that, even as the tragic events of 9-11 were unfolding, a “cell” of America-hating Arabs had been spotted on the roof of a building across the river from Manhattan in New Jersey, videotaping the World Trade Center tragedy and celebrating as the trade towers collapsed.
However, good newsman that he is, Rather was nonetheless dead wrong about the identity of those celebrating the tragedy.
In fact, as American Free Press (AFP) pointed out in a front-page story in its Oct. 1, 2001 issue (which went to press on Sept. 20), those “Arabs” seen dancing merrily, giving each other “high fives” and clearly celebrating the collapse of the trade towers were Israelis—Jewish Israelis—citizens of the nation said to be America’s best ally. And AFP said, flat out, that there was evidence to believe that these Israelis were, in fact, assets of Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad.
For daring to point out these facts, AFP was accused of “peddling anti-Israel conspiracy theories.”
But the story that unfolded in the wake of AFP’s report—which, by the way, constituted the first serious national recitation of the facts surrounding this affair—proved to be even more broad-ranging and more disturbing and pointed to Mossad foreknowledge of—and involvement in—the 9-11 attacks.
Scattered media reports mentioned that five “Middle Eastern” men had been seen “celebrating” the WTC attack, naturally leaving people with the impression that the men were Arabs or Muslims.
However what is interesting is that, in the early days following 9-11, when the story of that particular group of Israelis did leak into the media and the media did, in fact,mention that the men were Israelis, the media turned the tables in Talmudic fashion and cited the story as evidence that theArabs and the Muslims and assorted anti-Semites and critics of Israel were generating disinformation to discredit Israel.
For example, the Sept. 28-30, 2001 issue of USA Today cited the story of the five Israelis (calling them “Jews” and not identifying their nationality) and attempted to suggest that the story was a myth.
USA Today—which calls itself “America’s newspaper”—described the story as one of the “unsubstantiated rumors that implicate Israel” in the 9-11 attacks and one of which “many in the Muslim world are endlessly chewing over and recycling.
But as those who have bothered to follow the story know well, the so-called “rumor” was hardly a rumor, but, in fact, the cornerstone of a much bigger story than initially might have been imagined.
It took some six months before America’s oldest and most respected Jewish community newspaper—the New York-based Forward—finally confirmed for the record—in its March 15,2002 issue—that these Israeli Jews (those same ones described as an Arab “cell” by Dan Rather) were connected to the Mossad.
Forward published information that elaborated upon details first entered into the worldwide news record by AFP and which were subsequently picked up and given widespread distribution on the Internet.
Later we’ll discuss, in more detail, what Forward had to say.
However, in the meantime, here’s what AFP reported—some six months before—on Oct. 1, 2001, citing reports appearing at the time in local newspapers in New Jersey and New York and elements from its own inquiries. The essentials of the AFP story were as follows:
At least three different groups of Israelis were taken into custody after eyewitnesses reported seeing them celebrating the 9-11 attacks in three different locations across the river from Manhattan in New Jersey.
All three of these locations had clear views of the World Trade Center and were ideal places from which to document the tragedy.
In at least two of the cases, the men were, in fact, videotaping and some witnesses seemed to believe that the Israelis had already set up their recording devices even before the first attack on the first trade tower hit on 9-11 (and thus had advance knowledge of the attacks).
One group was in Liberty State Park in Jersey City, another in Liberty Park in Union City, New Jersey and a third group was in Weehawken, New Jersey on the roof of an Israeli-owned moving company, Urban Moving Systems.
In each of these three instances the Israelis questioned by the police were connected to Israeli-owned moving companies operating  out of NewYork and New Jersey.
In fact, the five Israelis seen in Jersey City—taken into custody by police in East Rutherford,New Jersey—were driving a van belonging to the same Urban Moving Systems upon whose roof the other group of five Israelis were also seen celebrating (and videotaping) the events at the World Trade Center.
Naturally, as any honest observer would have to conclude, it was highly unlikely (to say the least) that all of this—three different groups of Israelis connected to the same network of moving companies all acting in the same fashion in three different locations—could hardly be—as defenders of Israel claimed—“just a coincidence.”
In fact, further details emerging from the saga of those who became known as “the dancing Israelis” pointed in quite sinister directions that are, by any estimation, hard to explain.
• AFP noted in reporting on the arrest of the Israelis captured in the Urban Moving Systems van in East Rutherford, The Bergen [New Jersey] Record revealed on Sept. 12, 2001 that “sources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men to the bombing plot.” The source told the Record that:
There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted. It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.
The Record also reported that “sources also said that bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives.”
According to an Israel National News report on Oct. 26, 2001, these Israel detainees were suspected of “plotting to blow up” a New York bridge, although this allegation never reached most Americans who were being told of “Muslim plots” against Americans.
Initially—and this is interesting—other news sources suggested that explosives had been found in the van.
When, in fact, the “official” story from the U.S. government came out—denying the existence of any such explosives —this gave supporters of Israel the opportunity to say that it was a “myth” that these detained Israelis were in the possession of explosives.
Thus, they said, the entire story of the “dancing Israelis” was just based on reckless and inaccurate news reports that were later retracted and upon—of course—plain old hostility to dear little Israel. Anti-Semites and evil Muslims were collaborating to blame Israel for 9-11, or so they said.
But the fact that there were (presumably) no explosives in the van does not, however, preclude the possibility, as the Bergen Record’s source had contended that the Israelis were “hooked in” with what happened on September 11, considering all of the suspicious activity by three different groups of Israelis all connected to the same network of Israeli moving companies.
And contrary to stories put out by supporters of Israel, the Bergen Record did not retract its original story, for the fact is that the Record never claimed that there were explosives in the van.
So the Record had nothing to retract. Claims that the Record story was wrong are, in short,wrong.
In the meantime, however, these Israelis were never charged with any crime relating to the events of 9-11. Instead, they were turned over to the Immigration and Naturalization Service and quickly deported.
This recalls,of course, the deportation, ten days after the Oklahoma City bombing, of the “right wing” Israeli terrorist, Sharon Toval, a virtual look-alike for accused Okahoma bomber Timothy McVeigh.
The names of these suspects were never released to the public—or at least their names were never published or broadcast in the media.
However, it was not only in the New York-New Jersey area that Israelis working for Israeli-owned moving companies were taken into custody and suspected of involvement in terrorist-related activities.
Israeli-connected moving companies seemed to proliferate in the events surrounding 9-11. For example, on Dec. 24, 2001 AFP reported that:
On Oct. 17, the Pulitzer Prize-winning Pottstown (Pa.) Mercury reported that “two men whom police described as Middle Eastern”were detained in the Pottstown area (which is just northwest of Philadelphia) after being found with“detailed video footage of the Sears Tower in Chicago”—the tallest building in the world,widely mentioned as a possible terrorist target.
The Mercury did not identify the men’s nationality, but their names were Moshe Elmakias and Ron Katar.“Moshe” is a Hebrew name which is not likely to have been bestowed on a Muslim or an Arab.A woman named Ayelet Reisler, in their company, was also detained. She had a German passport in her name and medication in a different name.
The two men worked for a company known as “Moving Systems Incorporated.”
Again, supporters of Israel protested that it was “just a coincidence” that several different suspiciously-acting groups of Israelis would be working for moving companies and have detailed videos of the WTC disaster and the Sears Tower, another perceived potential terrorist target.
It was subsequently learned that there was a connecting network of Israeli-owned moving companies alongside Urban Moving Systems and Moving Systems, Inc. that operated under such names as Advance Moving System, AAA Van Lines, State to State Van Lines, America’s Best Movers and Quality Moving Storage—not to mention Moshe’s, which maintained a huge brick 15 story warehouse—employing hundreds of young Israelis—just outside the Holland Tunnel in Jersey City.
But, in the end, it was the five Israelis arrested on the roof of Urban Moving Systems (UMS) inWeehawken who received the most attention from the media and from independent investigators. They were brothers Paul and Sivan Kurzberg, Omer Marmari,Yaon Shmuel and Oded Ellner, all Israelis and all employees of UMS.
On Oct. 8, 2001, The New York Times finally reported on the five Israelis treating it as some sad quirk of fate for five innocent men.The Times did not report—as did AFP—that there may have been more than one Israeli-connected moving company involved and that there were actually other Israeli nationals taken into custody after the bombing.
And in Israel the plight of these lads also got some attention.The mother of one of the detainees told the Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, that the FBI had questioned her son as to whether he was an agent of Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad.
However,why the FBI might suspect that Mossad agents—assets of our valued ally Israel—may have been involved in the so-called “Arab terrorist” attack is a question that was carefully ignored by the mainstream media in America.
But these five young Israelis became very controversial,by anyone’s estimation and they had some high-level support.
On Nov. 23, 2001, Forward, the respected New York-based Jewish newspaper, reported that “top-ranking Israeli diplomats”had intervened with Attorney General John Ashcroft on behalf of the aforementioned Paul Kurzberg, his brother, and the three other young Israelis.
In its issue dated Dec. 17, 2001—which went to press on Dec. 7—AFP pointed out that Attorney General Ashcroft had released one of those Israelis—Paul Kurzberg—despite the fact that, according to a Nov. 21 report buried deep inside The NewYork Times, Kurzberg “had trouble” with a seven-hour polygraph test administered by the FBI.
Although Kurzberg had reportedly done“better on a second try,”the Israeli suspect still flunked both times. In fact, the Times had reported, Kurzberg “refused on principle to divulge much about his role in the Israeli army or subsequently working for people who may have had ties to Israeli intelligence.”
Yet, Ashcroft sent Kurzer and his four associates home to Israel, the suspicions surrounding them notwithstanding.
It was upon returning to the fabled land of milk and honey that one of the young Israelis,Oded Ellner,made remarks that today are a part of the lore surrounding suspicion of Israeli involvement in 9-11.
We refer to the often-heard claim that Ellner actually admitted in an interview on Israeli television that he and his colleagues had foreknowledge of the impending attack on the World Trade Center and that, he said, the reason why he and his friends were videotaping was that “our purpose was to document the event.”
This is a story that has captured the imagination of many sincere folks who do believe—as I do—that Israel not only had foreknowledge of the 9-11 attacks but actually orchestrated them.
Some quickly jumped upon this as some sort of “confession” and circulated the word on the Internet that Ellner had admitted—on television—that he and his associates had advance knowledge of the attack on the trade center and were, therefore, already set up and prepared to videotape the tragedy.
However, the story surrounding Ellner’s televised remarks is actually a distraction and—I am here to tell you without hesitation—is not “proof” of anything, no matter how much people want to believe it is.
While it is absolutely true that, while being interviewed on Israeli television, Ellner admitted he and his friends were videotaping the event,what Ellner said was hardly a confession to anything.
What he was saying, in answer to a question as to why they were videotaping, was essentially: “The reason why we had a video camera there was to film what was happening.”
So, today, while many 9-11 skeptics are often heard telling friends and family—“I’ve seen the video of Ellner saying those words and admitting he and his buddies knew the attack was going to happen and that’s why they were filming it”—the truth is that what those people have seen (circulated on the Internet) is a brief excerpt from the Israeli television interview (conducted in Hebrew) with an English-language voice-over translating Ellner’s comment into an awkward and stilted declarative sentence that has now been immortalized thusly: “Our purpose was to document the event.”
Now this is not to say that Ellner and the “dancing Israelis” did not have foreknowledge of the impending attacks. As we shall see later, there was much more about Ellner and his friends to be unveiled. But this particular comment has clearly been taken out of context.
While these young men—and the other Israelis seen videotaping the world trade center from at least one other location—almost assuredly did know in advance of the attacks and had, accordingly, set up their video equipment to “document the event,” the bottom line question is this: How likely is it that they would have confessed—even by accident—in a television interview conducted before a live audience?
A few folks—who are so determined to believe that Ellner’s words are indeed some sort of confession—will insist forever that Ellner’s“confession” is proof of Israeli foreknowledge and involvement in 9-11. But it isn’t. It’s another one of those stories that “sound good” but one which open-minded and objective folks interested in alternative views relating to 9-11 can not—and will not—find convincing.
So, with that brief digression into one of the more prominent legends surrounding 9-11,we will set aside the discussion of our Dancing Israeli friends from Urban Moving Systems for the moment.
However, there is much, much more to their story, and we’ll come back to them later.
In fact, as it was discovered, there were quite a few more other Israelis operating on American soil and they, too, were taken into custody following 9-11 and at least some of them were suspected by the FBI of possible involvement in the 9-11 tragedy.
In fact—as American Free Press reported on Dec. 17—The Washington Post had admitted on November 23 that among a total of some 60 young Israeli Jews picked up by the FBI in the wake of the terrorist attacks, there were a handful actually being held on suspicion of involvement in the terrorist acts of 9-11.
And remember—this admission came from a leading voice of the “mainstream” media, although, certainly, it was not given wide play in the pages of the Post or elsewhere in the media. So the truth is that while most of the Israelis arrested and detained since Sept.11 were held on immigration charges, not suspected of involvement in terrorism, there were exceptions.According to Post staff writer John Mintz:
In several cases, such as those in Cleveland and St. Louis, INS officials testified in court hearings that they were “of special interest to the government,” a term that federal agents have used in many of the hundreds of cases involving mostly Muslim Arab men who have been detained around the country since the terrorist attacks.
An INS official who requested anonymity said the agency will not comment on the Israelis. He said the use of the term “special interest” means the case in question is “related to the investigation of Sept. 11.”
All of the 60 Israeli detainees, according to the Post, were supposedly “observing a time-honored tradition in their country—touring the world after their mandatory service in the Israeli military.”The Post said “a number of them had served in counter-terrorist units in Israel.”
Although referring to Israel as a “close U.S. ally in the fight against terrorism,” the Post pointed out that one Israeli detainee, Liron Diamant, said that while he and his friends had first been mistaken as Arabs, the FBI still nonetheless conducted an “hours-long” interrogation after their Israeli identity had been determined and that they were “questioned in detail about their Israeli military service.”
Clearly, the fact the young men were Israelis did not preclude the suspicion,on the part of at least some good people in the FBI, that these Israelis might have had a hand in the terrorist attacks, a point that might confound those who believe all American law enforcement and intelligence officials are found firmly in Israel’s camp and devoted to the principle that Israel is a valuable ally that would do America no harm. 
But the whole Israeli connection to 9-11 went even further.
On Dec. 12, the “Special Report With Brit Hume” on Fox News featured reporter Carl Cameron who unveiled a staggering report on a wide-ranging Israeli espionage ring on U.S. soil.
Cameron’s report on Fox was so immediately controversial primarily because he asserted flat out there was evidence these Israelis were surveilling the reputed 9-11 terrorists prior to the Sept. 11 tragedy. On Dec. 24, AFP summarized Cameron’s report in which he stated in part:
There is no indication the Israelis were involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, but investigators suspect that they may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it.
A highly-placed investigator told Fox News there are “tie-ins,” but when asked for details flatly refused to describe them. [The investigator said:]
“Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information.”
During the segment, host Brit Hume asked Cameron:“What about this question of advance knowledge of what was going to happen on 9-11? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something?”Cameron responded:
It’s very explosive information, obviously, and there’s a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected. None of it necessarily conclusive.
It’s more when they put it all together. A bigger question, they say, is “How could they not have known?” [That is] almost a direct quote [from the investigators].
The Fox report indicated that prior to Sept. 11 as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in what was described by Cameron as “a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected Israeli espionage.”
According to Cameron:
Investigators are focusing part of their efforts on Israelis who said they are art students from the University of Jerusalem or Bezalel Academy and repeatedly made contact with U.S. government personnel by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork.
Documents say they “targeted” and penetrated military bases, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, dozens of government facilities and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel.
After the Fox report, there was an angry response from the Israeli lobby in America. The Dec. 21 issue of the Jewish weekly, Forward, reported Fox and Cameron were “under fire” from supporters of Israel for having dared to bring the matter to public attention. However, Forward also gloated that “the rest of the American media” had “barely noted” the Fox reports.
Whatever the case, Fox News pulled the transcriptions of Cameron’s broadcast reports off its Internet web site under pressure from such groups as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, but Cameron told Forward he continued to stand behind his story.
Meanwhile, the famed British intelligence and military analysis publication, Jane’s Information Group, noted the peculiar absence of reporting in the American media on this matter and commented:
It is rather strange that the U.S. media . . . seem to be ignoring what may well prove to be the most explosive story since the Sept. 11 attack, the alleged breakup of a major Israeli espionage operation in the United States which aimed to infiltrate both the Justice and Defense departments and which may also have been tracking Al-Qaeda terrorists before the aircraft hijackings took place.
So at the very least, there was strong evidence that, at the very least, Israeli intelligence operatives on American soil almost certainly had specific advance knowledge of the impending terrorist attacks on the United States but America’s “ally,” Israel, did not report this information to American authorities.
And that alone is an aspect of 9-11 that—for the most part—remains unknown to the broad swath of the American people.
On March 4, 2002, the story on the Israeli “art student” espionage ring popped back up when the French daily, Le Monde, carried an update, relying largely on reporting arising from an independent investigation by the Paris-based internet newsletter, Intelligence Online (IO), which, in turn, had been directed by the sources made available to Fox.
Citing the work by Fox, Le Monde pointed out how Fox refused to cooperate with Le Monde, saying it was “a problem,” but that Fox refused to be specific. Le Monde noted that IO had received a copy of a report prepared by an officer of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and others from the Immigration and Naturalization Service. A spokesman for the DEA, Will Glaspy, confirmed to Le Monde that the DEA “holds a copy” of that report.
The DEA document revealed many of the Israelis had addresses in South Florida very close to the homes of Arabs allegedly involved in the 9-11 attacks. For example, the alleged hijacking ringleader, Mohammad Atta, lived at 3389 Sheridan St. in Hollywood, Fla.,while a group of the Israelis resided only a few blocks away, at 4220 Sheridan.
On March 5, Reuters reported Le Monde’s article (even including the allegation of Israeli foreknowledge of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks).
Reuters, however, cited an un-named FBI spokesman who called it a “bogus story,” saying—despite all the evidence to the contrary—that “there wasn’t a spy ring.”
On March 6, the Associated Press reported the story but did not mention, however, that the Israelis were believed to have had intimate knowledge relating to the 9-11 terrorists.
On March 6, Washington Post staff writers John Mintz and Dan Eggen reported that Attorney General Ashcroft’s spokeswoman at the Justice Department, Susan Dryden, dismissed the story as “an urban myth that has been circulating for months.” She added: “The department has no information at this time to substantiate these widespread reports about Israeli art students involved in espionage.”
So it was that, again and again, the specter of Israeli foreknowledge and involvement in the events of 9-11 reared its ugly head. And even the major media was being forced to acknowledge it. But the story of the Dancing Israelis was not about to go away either.
In any event, at long last—as we mentioned at the outset of this chapter—the Jewish newspaper Forward finally acknowledged on March 15, 2002 that there was indeed a Mossad connection to the strange circumstances surrounding the multiple groups of Israelis (with links to a network of Israeli-controlled moving companies) who were observed acting suspiciously (and then taken into custody) on 9-11. The young Israelis were, in fact, assets of Israel’s Mossad.
As a consequence of the new admissions by Forward, we learned much more about at least that one specific group of five Israelis connected who were picked up in New Jersey after famously “high fiving” and celebrating the collapse of the World Trade Center as they videotaped the event from the roof of the Israeli-controlled Urban Moving Systems (UMS) company inWeehawken, New Jersey.
The Israelis in question were brothers Paul and Sivan Kurzberg, as well as Omer Marmari, Yaon Shmuel and Oded Ellner, the last of whom made the famous remarks on Israeli television—described earlier—about the intent of Ellner and his colleagues to “document the event.”
According to Forward, UMS was “a moving company with few discernable assets” that closed up immediately after the federal authorities began investigating its activities. The owner of UMS, Dominic Otto Suter “fled to Israel” after being questioned by the FBI.
Forward said one of its sources admitted that UMS was a Mossad-connected operation:
According to one former high-ranking American intelligence official,who asked not to be named, the FBI came to the conclusion at the end of its investigation that the five Israelis arrested in New Jersey last September were conducting a Mossad surveillance mission and that their employer, Urban Moving Systems ofWeehawken,N.J., served as a front.
After their arrest, the men were held in detention for two-and-a-half months and were deported at the end of November, officially for visa violations.
However, a counterintelligence investigation by the FBI concluded that at least two of them were Mossad operatives, according to the former American official,who said he was regularly briefed on the investigation by two separate law enforcement officials.
“The assessment was that Urban Moving Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it,” he said.
“The conclusion of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs but that they could leave because they did not know anything about 9/11.”
However, he added, the bureau was “very irritated because it was a case of so-called unilateral espionage,meaning they didn’t know about it.”
Forward said the FBI, the Justice Department and the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to discuss the case.
Forward reported that its source said that after the United States confronted the Israeli government, Israel privately admitted that UMS was a Mossad front. Citing its U.S. intelligence source, Forward said:
The nature of the investigation changed after the names of two of the five Israelis showed up on a CIA-FBI database of foreign intelligence operatives, he said.At that point, he said, the bureau took control of the investigation and launched a Foreign Counterintelligence Investigation, or FCI.
FBI investigations into possible links to the Sept. 11 attacks are usually carried by the bureau’s counterterrorism division, not its counterintelligence division.“An FCI means not only that it was serious but also that it was handled at a very high level and very tightly,” the former official said.That view was echoed by several former FBI officials interviewed.
In fact, it seems, the two specific Mossad assets were the Kurzberg brothers, Paul and Sivan, although, needless to say, the other Israelis were obviously in their sphere of influence and on the payroll of a Mossad front operation.The bottom line is that American Free Press had been on the mark from the very beginning. There was indeed a Mossad connection to 9-11, although the article in Forward, in many respects, read very much like an attempted cover-up.
The Forward recounting of the saga of the five Israelis was woven into a larger story describing controversy surrounding the separate reports of espionage by the so-called Israeli “art students.”And although (as noted earlier) a spokesman for Attorney General John Ashcroft had dismissed the “art student” affair as an “urban myth,” Forward effectively exposed Ashcroft’s prevarication, admitting that:
In March 2001, the federal National Counterintelligence Executive issued a warning urging employees to report all contact
with people describing themselves as Israeli art students. It said some had gone to private residences of senior U.S. officials under the guise of selling art.
“These individuals have been described as aggressive,” the warning said.“They attempt to engage employees in conversation rather than giving a sales pitch.”However, the warning added that there may be two groups involved, one with an “apparently legitimate money-making goal while the second, perhaps a non-Israeli group, may have ties to a Middle Eastern Islamic fundamentalist group.”
Naturally, Forward defended Israel, proclaiming: “Far from pointing to Israeli spying against U.S. government and military facilities . . . the incidents in question appear to represent a case of Israelis in the United States spying on a common enemy, radical Islamic networks suspected of links to Middle East terrorism.” Forward contended that tensions between the U.S. and Israel arose not because the United States believed the Israelis were spying on Americans but because the Israelis had failed to advise the United States that they were engaged in spying against the Arab terrorists on American soil.
Forward’s suggestion that two such groups were operating (and that one may have been a “non-Israeli group” posing as Israelis) was interesting, for it raises the logical counter-question: Was there also group of Israelis operating in the United States posing as Arabs—a possibility that, in fact, had first been broached by AFP as far back as Dec. 24, 2001 (a point to be examined in greater detail later in these pages.)
On June 21, 2002, ABC’s weekly newsmagazine,“20/20”—featuring hostess Barbara Walters—was forced to acknowledge growing public belief that Israeli intelligence had foreknowledge of—or was perhaps involved in—the 9-11 terrorist attacks, a belief stimulated from awareness of the story of the Dancing Israelis.
In a segment entitled “TheWhite Van,”ABC tackled the problematic fact that these several groups of Israeli nationals in the New York-New Jersey area had been taken into custody on suspicion of having been involved in some way with the terrorist attacks.
ABC—of course—never mentioned American Free Press (AFP) but it’s clear that AFP’s considerable outreach stimulated discussion of the story in the first place. However, it is no surprise ABC went into a damage-control mode on Israel’s behalf.Those at the highest levels of ABC are, to put it simply, known for their sympathies toward Israel.
ABC’s admissions were grudging at best. ABC would not admit flat out, that the Israelis were Mossad operatives.All ABC would say was that was that there were those in official circles in the United States who said the Israelis were Mossad.They said others don’t think so.
But if they were Mossad agents, ABC assured the audience, they weren’t doing anything against the the United States.At most they were simply monitoring Arab and Muslim groups in the NewYork-New Jersey area.That was a good thing,ABC explained.
Thus, ABC’s presentation sought to refute the evidence and defuse the belief that the Israelis had any involvement in—or even foreknowledge of—the terrorist attack. Barbara Walters summarized the story by lisping smugly,“I hope we’ve put all these wumors to rest.”
Not hardly, Barbara.



CRIMINAL ZIONISTS - GUILTY FOR TERRORISM AND MASS MURDER ON 9/11/01

Introduction

So you think you know that Arabs did 9/11? You saw it on TV and read it in the newspapers, so it must be true, right? Actually, there is overwhelming proof from multiple, corroborating lines of evidence that the operation was conceived and orchestrated by a group of fanatical Jewish terrorists.
The following facts are all derived from mainstream news outlets and organizations such as The New York Times, The New York Observer, the Daily News (New York), CNN, Silverstein Properties, The Washington Times, the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, The Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, Arutz Sheva, Ynetnews.com, Jweekly.com, Netanyahu.org, The Times (London, original), The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Boston Globe, the Los Angeles Times, The Seattle Times, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Mercury (Pottstown, PA), The Miami Herald, The Chicago Sun-Times, Fox News, Asia Times Online, System Planning Corporation, the Mineta Transportation Institute / Norman Mineta, the Eisenhower Research Project, the Belfer Center, the United Nations, NIST, the DoD and the FBI. Links to the actual sources and screenshots of particularly relevant news reports are available at the Further reading references at the bottom of this page.

The incontrovertible facts

Within five minutes of the first plane impact (Flight 11) into the North Tower, three Israeli Jews - Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner and Yaron Shmuel - were seen high-fiving, smiling, hugging each other, joking and flicking lighters in a jovial, celebratory mood as they filmed the burning WTC atop a van in the parking lot of the Doric apartment block at 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City, New Jersey. They were "visibly happy on nearly all" of the 76 photographs that they'd taken, which were subsequently developed by the FBI after the Israelis had been arrested. All three gave differing accounts of how they came to be at 100 Manhattan Avenue within such a short time of the first crash. Shmuel originally made a preposterous claim that they were on the "West Side Highway" at the time of the "incident" (it's an 11-minute drive to 100 Manhattan Avenue at the best of times, when there is no major incident that could disrupt traffic flowing through the Lincoln Tunnel). The other two agreed that they were at their workplace - the Urban Moving Systems offices located at 3 West 18th Street, Weehawken, NJ - when they learned about the event.
Problem is, it's a 4- or 5-minute drive from 3 West 18th Street, Weehawken to 100 Manhattan Avenue in Union City - and this was in the rush hour.
Kurzberg, Ellner and Shmuel variously claimed to have stopped for gas, to have climbed onto the Urban Moving Systems roof, and to have been caught in heavy traffic, prior to arriving at the Doric apartment block - which makes their version of events even more impossible. They were seen filming and celebrating with high-fives and hugs on the roof of their van not only before the second plane crash - when innocent bystanders believed the first crash had simply been a terrible accident - but before the news had broken on the local AM news radio station 1010 WINS. And 1010 WINS quickly broke the news because they had one of their account executives - Joan Fleischer - actually on her cell phone to the news room as the first plane crashed. She'd been watching it approach from the roof of her building, just blocks from the World Trade Center, and knew it was going to crash.
It's clearly impossible for the Israeli "moving company" employees to have learned of the event, grabbed their Canon EOS SLR and Pentax P550 cameras which they conveniently had with them (they're supposed to be "movers", not photographers!), rushed out of their workplace presumably without bothering to ask for time off for their new hobby as amateur "journalists", driven through rush-hour traffic from Weehawken to Union City as they quickly decided on a good vantage point, made a left turn into the Doric apartment block, parked in the parking lot facing the Towers, jumped out and climbed onto the roof of the van with their cameras - all before the local news radio station could patch through to the newsroom a trusted account executive who was already talking to the newsroom at the very instant the first plane crashed into the North Tower.
We could go on about how Ellner admitted that they decided to go to the Doric apartment block parking lot because it provided "a view of the entire length of both towers" - when at the time of this decision the only Tower to have been hit by a plane was the North Tower (WTC1), and floors 94 to 98 of the North Tower were visible from the street outside Urban Moving System's offices, or from the Urban Moving Systems roof. Or about how Ellner apologized for appearing happy in the photographs, and said it was because they believed that the incident would prompt the U.S. to "take steps to stop terrorism in the world". This was after a single plane crash, when it was widely believed to have been an accident. Or about how the Israelis were found to be in possession of "maps of the city [...] with certain places highlighted" that linked them to the attacks, and in possession of  "airline tickets with immediate travel dates for destinations world-wide". Or about how Sivan Kurzberg had been seen at the Doric apartment block the day before 9/11. Or about how other Israeli nationals made an unscheduled trip to the vicinity of the Flight 93 crash site in the early hours of 9/11. Or about how Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front, was closed down and some of the employees fired at lunch time on 9/11/01, before five of its employees were arrested that afternoon, and three days before its owner Dominik Suter needed to flee to Israel on September 14.
Daniel Lewin, one of the Flight 11 passengers, attained the rank of Captain in the Israeli special forces Sayeret Matkal, was an alumnus of MIT, and had lived in Denver and Jerusalem. Interestingly, Lewin "loved jumping out of planes". The probability that an ex-Israeli elite special forces guy would "coincidentally" just happen to be on a plane that was hijacked by "Arab" terrorists beggars belief. However, the "coincidences" don't end there.
Benjamin Netanyahu, an Israeli prime minister both prior to and post 9/11, also attained the rank of Captain in Sayeret Matkal, is an alumnus of MIT, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem, in common with Daniel Lewin, which makes it unlikely that the two were unaware of each other. Netanyahu is a close friend of Larry Silverstein, the leader of a consortium that took over a 99-year lease on the WTC complex six weeks prior to 9/11 and insured against terrorism, to cover property loss and business interruption to the tune of $3,546,800,000 "per occurrence". The lease for the Towers specifically included a clause stating that in the event of terrorist attacks, the leaseholders could walk away from their obligations whilst collecting on the insurance. Netanyahu gained a BSc in architecture at MIT, and as early as 1993, would have had access to blueprints of the WTC buildings either from his friend Larry Silverstein who was the owner and (1987) developer of WTC7, or from Lewis M. Eisenberg, the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey who went on to oversee the privatization of the WTC in the run-up to 9/11 and was a supporter of Zionist "charities". Netanyahu would have been aware that taking out five contiguous floors from a WTC Tower would suffice to leave too many core columns above the critical slenderness ratio, with consequent Euler buckling effecting global instability and collapse of the building. Thus, Netanyahu and his Sayeret Matkal and Mossad associates would have been capable of devising a plan to demolish the buildings and make the collapses look like the result of office fires and plane crashes.
Flight 11 crashed into the north face of WTC1 whilst banking at a 25° angle so that the impact zone covered five floors - the very same five contiguous floors (94-98) that not only had upgraded fireproofing (SFRM) installed between 1996 and 1998, but also had SFRM that was found to have a high density compared to that of the other upgraded floors. Not only was the impact zone at the very center of the "upgraded" floors 92 to 100, but the upgraded SFRM on floors 94 to 98 had an average SFRM density and applied thickness of 21.24 pcf and 2.993 inches as opposed to 18.9365 pcf and 2½ inches respectively on all upgraded floors, or 18.2167 pcf on upgraded floors outside the impact zone. Thus, the upgraded fireproofing on the WTC1 impact zone floors had an excess mass of 3.02 pcf or 16.6%, which is consistent with ~14.22% by mass of non-standard materials of a relatively high density - e.g., accelerants - embedded in the space between the fibers of the impact zone's "upgraded" mineral wool SFRM.
UpgradedSFRMDensityMedRes

WTC Tower Floor No. Location Date of Report Average SFRM thickness (in.) Adhesion/cohesion (psf) Density (pcf)
1 79 Multiple tenant floor 11/24/99 2.4 333 16.6
1 81 Multiple tenant floor 10/24/96 2.7 270 19.0
1 81 Multiple tenant floor 7/16/99 2.6 377 17.5
1 83 Suite 8331 12/15/99 2.2 259 16.0
1 85 Multiple tenant floor 12/24/97 3.1 210 23.7
1 85 Multiple tenant floor 6/12/99 2.9 278 15.8
1 85 Suite 8563 8/16/99 2.8 259 16.4
1 92 Full floor 4/2/97 2.9 348 17.9
1 93 Full floor 8/28/98 2.1 186 17.0
1 94 Full floor 12/27/96 4.1 426 20.6
1 95 Full floor 8/24/98 2.6 258 19.5
1 96 Full floor 10/22/98 3.1 366 20.0
1 97 Full floor 10/22/98 2.3 432 23.5
1 98 Full floor 11/19/98 2.7 425 22.6
1 99 Full floor 11/20/98 2.4 210 17.9
1 100 Full floor 11/20/98 3.1 296 17.9
1 102 Full floor 9/28/99 2.8 327 16.4
2 77 Full floor 6/9/98 2.5 282 18.7
2 78 Full floor 4/3/98 2.7 279 17.6
2 88 Full floor 7/5/00 2.1 219 16.3
2 89 Full floor 5/5/99 2.8 324 17.8
2 92 Full floor 2/26/98 2.8 333 20.2
2 99 Half floor 7/28/97 2.6 284 21.1
2 99 Half floor 4/3/98 1.8 288 20.7
Dr. Astaneh-Asl found a steel beam from the WTC that had partly "vaporized" in "searing temperatures" prior to collapse, and fireproofing that had "melted into a glassy residue". This is not consistent with "office fires", which should not be capable of delivering sufficient heat to vaporize parts of a fireproofed steel beam. Cafco Blaze-Shield Type II SFRM used in the WTC fireproofing upgrade, and the previous Type DC/F, are both comprised of silicates and calcium sulphate, which do not undergo phase changes or decomposition until heated to above 1,200 °C. NIST carried out heat capacity measurements on Blaze-Shield II, heating it up to 1,200 °C. The "glassy residue" suggests CaO and SiO2, requiring decomposition of a silicate as well as CaSO4.
The whole point of the February 1993 WTC garage bombing, which occurred two years after Israeli security officials inspected the garage of Zim Shipping in the WTC and concluded that the WTC garage would be vulnerable to a car bomb, and in which the FBI was aware of the plot via their informant Emad Salem yet let it go ahead after a plan to substitute harmless powder for the explosives was called off by an FBI supervisor, and in which Ahmad Ajaj is a suspected Israeli intelligence mole, was to provide a pretext for fireproofing "upgrades". Israeli "moving companies" would switch the official Cafco fireproofing for the lethal Israeli version. Deloitte & Touche (formerly Deloitte Haskins & Sells) were badly disrupted by the 1993 bombing, and announced in June 1993 that they would not be returning to the WTC. The fireproofing upgrades were carried out on floors without tenants, and after Deloitte & Touche were gone, the Port Authority was left with "about seven and a half floors of prime space in Tower One" (which included the entire impact zone floors 94-98) for which new tenants were needed, making it the "last large block of contiguous space available in the complex". Thus, the perpetrators were aware prior to 1996 that floors 94-98 were a contiguous set of vacant floors that would be upgraded, so they knew which floors should be sabotaged with the fake SFRM. The "upgrades" to these floors were carried out in 1996 and 1998.
Benjamin Netanyahu was in London on the morning of the 7/7 bombings, and also had advance knowledge of the explosions. Moreover, Efraim Halevy, the London-born head of Israel's Mossad as of 9/11/01, very quickly revealed his intimate knowledge of the 7/7 bombings by referring to them as "simultaneous" in a newspaper article dated July 7. For the next two days, the British authorities believed erroneously that the explosions had occurred over a period of 26 minutes from 08:51 to 09:17, and did not manage to deduce that they were simultaneous until July 9.
Netanyahu "predicted" in 1995 that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC (and later credited his father with the "prediction"). Netanyahu declared on separate occasions that 9/11 was "very good" and beneficial for Israel. His late father Benzion - who had a great influence on his son - was chief aide and secretary to Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky, the Ukranian founder and driving force behind the Irgun, a terrorist group that went on to perpetrate atrocities such as the King David Hotel bombing of 1946, in which more than 90 were killed. Benzion Netanyahu was actually regarded as an "extremist" by Menachem Begin, the commander of the Irgun in 1946 at the time they bombed the King David Hotel. Benjamin Netanyahu's father-in-law Shmuel Ben-Artzi was a member of the Irgun terrorist group. And on the 60th anniversary of the King David Hotel bombing in 2006, Benjamin Netanyahu proudly participated in a two-day seminar commemorating the bombing.
We could go on about the Israeli "art students", or how the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company moved out of the WTC on September 4, 2001 - one week prior to 9/11/01. Or how Rabbi Dov Zakheim was Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 until after 9/11/01, delivered a commemorative sermon on the Pentagon lawn to hundreds of co-religionists from 40 countries exactly six months after 9/11 on March 11, 2002, was co-signatory to a September 2000 paper that wrote of the 'benefits' of a "new Pearl Harbor", and was CEO of SPC International, a company whose Radar Physics Group produced "Flight Termination Systems" incorporating a "Command Transmitter System" whereby an operator or operators could electronically hijack multiple in-flight aircraft "several hundreds of miles" away and simultaneously steer them into targets. (Lewin's job would have been to take out the pilots so that they couldn't regain manual control.) Or about how Flight 77 - the plane that was allegedly flown by Hani Hanjour, a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all" and was refused permission to fly solo in a Cessna 172 in the second week or the middle of August 2001 - "coincidentally" crashed into the Pentagon's accounting section, eighteen months after it was revealed that the Pentagon's finances were "in disarray" and almost $7 trillion of bookkeeping adjustments had been required in order to balance the accounts, with $2.3 trillion of those corrections lacking receipts. Or how New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik visited Israel two weeks prior to 9/11 from August 26-29, 2001, at which time he met Eitan Wertheimer, one of Israel's richest businessmen who was reading Popular Mechanics at the age of 4. Kerik announced on September 16, 2001 that a "passport belonging to one of the hijackers" had been "discovered", and denied that an Israeli van stopped near the George Washington Bridge on 9/11 contained explosives after it reportedly contained "tons" of high explosives that could do great damage to the bridge. Kerik later received a $250,000 "loan" from Wertheimer, and was subsequently indicted, convicted and jailed for lying, conspiracy and fraud.
However, the evidence against the official 9/11 loony conspiracy theory of 19 hijackers with box cutters is so overwhelming that anybody believing it after learning of the facts would be best advised to seek psychiatric help.

Further reading

Why 9/11 researchers know the official story is false
The "Dancing Israelis" FBI Report - Debunked
Millette study fails to refute crucial findings by Harrit et al
Note: The above three articles provide hundreds of references to mainstream sources.
Stranger Than Fiction
The Synagogue of Satan
Waters Flowing Eastward





Sur ce blog:

Les documents du FBI sur les fameux "Israéliens dansants" arrêtés le 11 septembre 2001

Analyse du rapport du FBI sur les "Israéliens dansants"

Démystifier le 11 septembre: Israël et la tactique de l'erreur, par Alan Sabrosky (ancien dir. des études du US Army War College)