vendredi 30 septembre 2011

La liberté de croire menacée en France par la chasse aux sorcières "anti-sectes"

Message important de Sott/Signes des Temps pour les lecteurs français
Au vu du harcèlement continu à l'encontre des membres de l'équipe de Sott.net et perpétué par le Service Régional de la Police Judiciaire de Toulouse, nous sommes obligés de conclure que le gouvernement français, en lien étroit avec des associations telles que MIVILUDES, estime que lire le contenu de ce site (et de ceux qui y sont associés) pose un danger grave à la santé mentale de tous les citoyens français qui, selon les autorités, sont « mentalement fragiles » et incapables de réfléchir par eux-mêmes. Ainsi, nous conseillons fortement à tous les lecteurs français de quitter ce site et de n'y plus jamais retourner.


Background to the Witch Hunt against SOTT: French-led FECRIS, key player behind increasing intolerance in Europe

Video-English--MIVILUDES: Some Truth and Lies in France's witch-hunt against 'subversives'

France Approved Anti-Cult Law on May 30, 2001 - Seven Things You Can Do Immediately About the French Law: A Manifesto

SECTES - L'interview de Maître Jean-Pierre Joseph

SOTT.net Under Atttack - French Police Target Alternative News Site - Your Site Next?

French police target an alleged 'cult' web site

Video-English--Georges Fenech of MIVILUDES, Nemesis of the Scientific Method

Les Français se suicident plus que d'autres mais c'est sans rapport avec les minorités spirituelles

France puts itself on suicide watch: MIVILUDES vilifying 'cults' to justify its own existence

Documentaire essentiel du CICNS - La France antisectes : état des lieux

Big Agri-Business, Big Pharma, Arms Trafficking, Suicide Cults and MIVILUDES - The Truth Behind France's Cult-Hunting Policies Exposed

Big Agro-Business, Big Pharma, Trafic d'armes, sectes suicidaires et MIVILUDES - ce que cache la politique de chasse aux sectes en France

"Heck, when you look closely at French MIVILUDES, you get the faint imprint of MOSSAD and the CIA appearing like a watermark on copy paper." (Laura Knight-Jadzcyk



Mike Kropveld est directeur d'Info-Sectes. Il serait un ancien mooniste déprogrammé! (Le révérend Moon était une créature de la CIA liée au pouvoir juif et sa secte fait dans le mind control-CIA)

Kopveld est dans la direction de l'International Cultic Studies Association. Ya pas mal de juifs là-bas...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Cultic_Studies_Association
In 2004, the International Cultic Studies Association created the Margaret Singer Award in her honor. Philip Elberg received the award in 2004 for "his work in advancing the understanding of coercive persuasion and undue influence". Arnold Markowitz received the award in 2006, for "26 Years of Helping Families and Ex-members".
(...)
Notable members of the Executive Advisory Board of the ICSA include:
(En passant, Clark Kent, alias Superman, est une création juive. C'est un nom juif.)



Kropveld est-il juif ? Fort probablement voire certainement:

infosect.freeshell.org/infocult/phenomene/IC-MRTEXT.pdf
Info–secte a été créé en 1980 sous le nom de Projet culte. A l’origine, un groupe d’étudiants juifs de l’Université McGill préoccupés par le phénomène sectaire après le suicide collectif du Temple du peuple au Guyana.

Michael Kropveld - Directeur général et fondateur d'Info-Secte

Michael Kropveld is Founder and Executive Director of Info-Cult / Info-Secte, based in Montreal, Canada, and sits on the board of the International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA). Since 1980 he has assisted thousands of former members and members of "cults," "new religious movements," and other groups, and their families. He has served as an expert witness on cult-related criminal and civil cases, and is consulted regularly by mental health professionals and law enforcement agencies. Since the mid 1990s he has collaborated on the organizing of the ICSA annual international conferences on cultic phenomena. He has been an invited speaker worldwide, and has appeared on many radio and television programs locally, nationally and internationally. Among other publications he co-authored, in 2006, The Cult Phenomenon: How Groups Function / Le phénomène des sectes: L'étude du fonctionnement des groupes. Both versions are downloadable for free here. He was awarded the 125 Commemorative Medal in 1992 by the Government of Canada "in recognition of significant contribution to compatriots, community and to Canada" and in 2007 he received the Herbert L. Rosedale Award from ICSA "in recognition of leadership in the effort to preserve and protect individual freedom."


http://infosect.freeshell.org/infocult/ic-f6.html
(...)
CONSULTATION Mike Kropveld, fondateur et directeur général d’Info-Secte, a souvent été appelé à aider des particuliers, des membres de professions et des organisations à cause de son expérience et de ses connaissances dans le domaine.Il a agi en tant que consultant pour plusieurs projets avec les médias, tels que: Les Adeptes et Les Prisons de l’esprit, produit par l’Office Nationale du Film du Canada; Billet pour le Ciel, un film gagnant du prix Génie de 1981 comme meilleur film de l’année; Coping With Cults, un cours en dix volets pour les classes et les groupes de jeunes. Mike Kropveld a aussi été engagé comme consultant pour plusieurs autres documentaires (français et anglais) parus à la télévision partout au monde.
Mike Kropveld a été mandaté pour témoigner en tant qu’expert pour des causes criminelles et civiles dans des provinces canadiennes et aux États et a été engagé à plusieurs reprises par des avocats pour de la recherche et de la préparation pour différentes causes. Il a travaillé comme consultant pour des causes de divorce, de garde d’enfant, de disputes immobilières et des causes criminelles au Canada, aux États-Unis et en Europe. Autant au Canada qu’au niveau international, il s’est adressé à des centaines de groupes professionnels et communautaires sur le phénomène sectaire et a aussi paru sur nombre d’émissions radio et télé locales, nationales et internationales. On lui a décerné la médaille commémorative du 125ième « en reconnaissance de sa contribution significative au bien-être de ses compatriotes, sa communauté et au Canada » par le Gouvernement du Canada (1992). En 2007 il a été récipiendaire du prix Herbert L. Rosedale Award de l’International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA) « en reconnaissance de son leadership dans l’effort de préserver et de protéger les libertés individuelles ».
SERVICE D'INFORMATION AUX ENTREPRISES: Mike Kropveld a évalué les pratiques de groupes qui offrent des cours qui disent augmenter les revenus d’une entreprise. Il a travaillé avec les gestionnaires pour investiguer des allégations d’«abus sectaires» dans des organisations et peut aussi conseiller votre entreprise sur les pratiques éthiques de groupes qui sollicitent des fonds ou qui offrent des programmes de parrainage humanitaire.
Certains services peuvent comporter des frais.
SÉMINAIRES DE FORMATION
Info-Secte est disponible pour des sessions de formation et des séminaires pour des employés et des professionnels d’organismes s’occupant de clients ou du public en général. Nous avons organisé des sessions de formation pour des policiers, des médecins, des infirmières, des syndicats, des entreprises, des avocats, des travailleurs sociaux, des chefs religieux, des employés gouvernementaux et des enseignants.
Quelques sujets traités dans des séminaires:

  • Comment évaluer des groupes sociaux ou religieux qui recherchent votre collaboration;
  • Comment aider un employé ou un client qui est affecté lorsqu’un ami ou un proche adhère à une «secte»;
  • Comment informer vos étudiants ou vos employés;
  • Comment aider d’anciens membres de «sectes» ou de groupes abusifs ou trop directifs;
  • Comment déceler des abus d’enfants dans des groupes.
Certains services peuvent comporter des frais.
Pour plus d’information sur ces services ou toute information complémentaire, veuillez contacter:

Info-Secte
5655, avenue du Parc, Bureau 208
Montréal (Québec), Canada H2V 4H2
Tél. (514) 274-2333   Fax (514) 274-7576






Qui est Rosedale?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_L._Rosedale
Rosedale was counsel for the New York City Jewish Community Relations Council Task Force on Cults and Missionaries and the New York Interfaith Coalition of Concern About Cults.[1]


Il a été président de l'American Family Foundation... CIA!!!!!! L'AFF a été fondée par un ancien International Program Manager d'une importante compagnie de contracteurs pour la défense américaine Raytheon.

À lire, un article larouchiste intéressant sur l'American Family Foundation.

Il y a aussi l'Église qui est active dans les mouvements antisectes: Unadfi Dossier Omnium n°2. La secte anti-secte et la psychiatrie

Ces groupes antisectes se retrouvent souvent à combattre les groupes haineux. À comparer les moonistes aux jeunesses nazies...

Ce rabbin a assimilé les moonistes aux jeunesses nazies
Cults Hearing Noisy, Tense, By Marjorie Hyer, Washington Post, Tuesday, February 6, 1979; Page A14
.. they saved their deepest animus for Rabbi Maurice Davis of White Plains, N.Y., a prime mover in the anti-cult movement. He was repeatedly interrupted with shouts of "lies! That's a lie!" as he spoke of death threats he had received and likened the Unification Church to the Nazi Youth Movement and the Peoples Temple. The rabbi inflamed the crowd even further with his concluding comments: "I am here to protest against child molesters. For as surely as there are those who lure children with lollipops in order to rape their bodies, so, too, do these lure children with candy-coated lies in order to rape their minds."
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Davis#cite_note-culthearing-7

Tiré du site officiel de l'International Cultic Studies Association. Rosedale a écrit l'élégie d'un rabbin qui a lui aussi été directeur de l'American Family Fondation pour The Cult Observer. C'est l'AFF qui publie la revue The Cult Observer. :
http://www.icsahome.com/infoserv_articles/foster_lawrence_religiousgenius_abs.asp?ID=32679
IN MEMORIAM
Rabbi Maurice Davis: Human Rights Champion
Rabbi Maurice Davis, Director Emeritus of the American Family Foundation [publisher of The Cult Observer], died late last year after a long illness.
A graduate of the Hebrew Union College, and the retired rabbi of the Jewish Community Center of White Plains, New York, Rabbi Davis devoted his life to the campaign for human rights. He founded the Kentucky Committee on Desegregation in 1952, and in 1966 he marched with Martin Luther King from Selma to Montgomery. In 1965 he served as chairman of the President's Commission on Equal Opportunity.
Rabbi Davis first began helping cult victims in 1970, when two congregants' children became involved in the Unification Church. In time, he personally counseled nearly 200 cultists to leave destructive groups. He also directed and appeared in the film, You Can Go Home Again, a cult-education production of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations. In 1982, Rabbi Davis received the Cult Awareness Network's Leo J. Ryan award, given in memory of the congressman murdered during an investigation of Jonestown.
Captions beneath a picture of Rabbi Davis:


  • He marched with Martin Luther King from Selma to Montgomery.


  • He served as chairman of the President's Commission on Equal Opportunity.


  • He saw clearly the dangers which awaited those who lost their free will to totalism.
A great and gentle radiance has left our scene with the death of Rabbi Maurice Davis. He was one of the people who first brought me into the circle of those devoted to helping cult victims. His compassion and vision were inspiring. He saw clearly the dangers which awaited those who lost their free will to totalism.
I remember vividly one of my early contacts with Rabbi Davis, when an attorney for a destructive group was trying to get him to explain what he had said to a member of that group when she returned briefly to her family and agreed to speak with him. "I prayed with her," he said. "I prayed that she remember the teachings  of her youth and her love for her family ." The lawyer for the group was taken aback. "Is that all you did?", he said. "Was that all it was.'? ....Yes," Rabbi Davis answered, "the rest was up to her."
It was that blend of hope, vision, and respect for the judgment of others that became the cornerstone of the American Family Foundation' s ideals. We owe much to Rabbi Davis and we honor him with our continued commitment.
Herbert L. Rosedale
President, American Family Foundation

The Cult Observer                                        3                                          Vol. 11 No. 1 1994


Wikipedia écrit sur le rabbin antisecte:

Maurice Davis (December 15, 1921 – December 14, 1993[1]) was a rabbi, and human rights activist. He was a past director of the American Family Foundation, now known as the International Cultic Studies Association. Davis was the rabbi of the Jewish Community Center of White Plains, New York. Davis was a regular contributor to The Jewish Post and Opinion, where he had a column. Davis served on the President's Commission on Equal Opportunity, in the Lyndon B. Johnson Administration.

Family life Rabbi Davis married Marion Cronbach, daughter of Rose Hentil and prominent reform rabbi and well-known pacifist (and Davis' teacher) Abraham Cronbach. Davis and his wife had two children, JayR (Bahir), who has two children and is the rabbi of Rocky Mountain Hai, a trans-denominational Havurah based in Colorado; and Michael, who has four children and is the rabbi of Congregation Emanu-El, Wichita, Kansas.

Civil rights work In 1952, Davis founded the Kentucky Committee on Desegregation. In 1965 he marched with Martin Luther King, Jr. from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama and was appointed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by President Johnson.

Opposition to the Unification Church In 1970, when two of his congregants' children became involved with the Unification Church, Davis began to educate himself more about the nature and methodology of cults. He soon became involved in assisting the parents of "cult children".[2] Davis directed and appeared in the film, You Can Go Home Again, produced by the Union of American Hebrew Congregations. Davis observed commonalities among the young people he counseled that had joined cults. He found that most of these individuals were dropouts from mainline churches and synagogues - and that they were on a quest for idealism, community and a sense of belonging.[3]
Davis founded and headed the national anti-Moon organization called Citizens Engaged in Reuniting Families, which in 1976 comprised 500 families.[4] Davis stated that he received letters from distraught parents all over the United States, telling "the same story".[5] He elaborated his points, asserting that the recruitment tactics used by the Unification Church are "a form of hypnotism".[5] In November 1976, Rabbi Davis spoke at Temple Israel of Northern Westchester, New York, on the topic of "The Moon People And Our Children".[6] He has also compared the Unification Church to the Nazi Youth movement, and to the Peoples Temple.[7]

Other work opposing controversial groups In 1980 Davis was sued for $2 million by a woman who claimed that he held her against her will in a deprograming case.[8] Davis later testified at a Congressional panel organized by Senator Bob Dole that he had received death threats due to his statements.[7] In 1990, Davis criticized the Jews for Jesus movement as being "devious" and "deceptive". He further stated that people who accept Jesus as the Messiah are, by definition, Christians not Jews.[9]

Later life Herbert L. Rosedale, at the time president of the American Family Foundation, said of Davis: "A great and gentle radiance has left our scene with the death of Rabbi Maurice Davis. He was one of the people who first brought me into the circle of those devoted to helping cult victims. His compassion and vision were inspiring. He saw clearly the dangers which awaited those who lost their free will to totalism."

Quotes
  • Brotherhood postponed. The time has come, and it has been a long time in coming. The time has come to worship with our lives as with our lips, in the streets as in the sanctuaries. And we who dare to call God, God, must begin to learn the challenge which that word contains.[10]
  • We know, and we must never forget, that every path leads somewhere. The path of segregation leads to lynching. The path of anti-Semitism leads to Auschwitz. The path of cults leads to Jonestown. We ignore this fact at our peril.[11]
  • The last time I ever witnessed a movement that had these qualifications: (1) a totally monolithic movement with a single point of view and a single authoritarian head; (2) replete with fanatical followers who are prepared and programmed to do anything their master says; (3) supplied by absolutely unlimited funds; (4) with a hatred of everyone on the outside; (5) with suspicion of parents, against their parents—the last movement that had those qualifications was the Nazi youth movement, and I'll tell you, I'm scared.[12]
  • They have distorted our holidays, demeaned our faith, misstated our history, and belittled a legacy which we have spent centuries preserving and enlarging.[9]
  • I keep thinking what happens when the power of love is twisted into the love of power.[13]
Education

Works

References
  1. ^ New York Times Obituary
  2. ^ Hypnosis for young adults: Freeing “the doctor who resides within”, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, ISSN 0022-0116, Volume 12, Number 2 / September, 1981.
  3. ^ "A Glass Half Empty", James J. DiGiacomo, America, Vol. 191 No. 7, September 20, 2004., ISSN: 0002-7049
  4. ^ Mad About Moon, TIME Magazine, November 10, 1975
    Last week Sheeran and 500 other parents met at a Westchester County synagogue whose rabbi, Maurice Davis, heads a 500-family national anti-Moon organization called Citizens Engaged in Reuniting Families. Some 20 young defectors from the Moon cult were present; several urged their elders to drive up to Barrytown and rescue their children. Distraught parents gave one another moral support.
  5. ^ a b United States Congressional Record, 94th Congress, United States House of Representatives, 2nd session, January 28, 1976, Congressional Record, Volume 122, Part 2.
    It’s frightening what these Moonies can do to the family unit..I get letters from parents all over the country telling me the same story..The kids are swept along by his outfit and then taken away for a few days to a ‘workshop.’ By the time the parents see their kids again – if they can manage to see them – the kids are starry-eyed and ready to take on anyone who disagrees with them. It’s a form of hypnotism. There is something very unhealthy going on.
  6. ^ A Temple on the Mount: A History of Temple Israel of Northern Westchester, by Jacob Judd, Ph.D., 1999, retrieved 2/8/07.
  7. ^ a b Cults Hearing Noisy, Tense, By Marjorie Hyer, Washington Post, Tuesday, February 6, 1979; Page A14
    .. they saved their deepest animus for Rabbi Maurice Davis of White Plains, N.Y., a prime mover in the anti-cult movement. He was repeatedly interrupted with shouts of "lies! That's a lie!" as he spoke of death threats he had received and likened the Unification Church to the Nazi Youth Movement and the Peoples Temple. The rabbi inflamed the crowd even further with his concluding comments: "I am here to protest against child molesters. For as surely as there are those who lure children with lollipops in order to rape their bodies, so, too, do these lure children with candy-coated lies in order to rape their minds."
  8. ^ Rabbi continues push for cult deprogramming, Syracuse Herald-Journal, Friday July 25, 1980
  9. ^ a b The Indianapolis Star, January 27, 1990, page A-8, By Carol Elrod, Star Religion Writer
    In his column in a recent issue of The Jewish Post and Opinion, a national newspaper, Rabbi Maurice Davis wrote that people who refer to themselves as Jews for Jesus, Hebrew Christians or Messianic Jews "have pretended not only that they are Jewish, which they are not, but that they speak for either Jews or Judaism, which they do not." "They have distorted our holidays, demeaned our faith, misstated our history, and belittled a legacy which we have spent centuries preserving and enlarging." Rabbi Davis, a former spiritual leader at Indianapolis Hebrew Congregation, went on to note that people who accept Jesus as the Messiah by definition Christians; they are not Jewish.
  10. ^ "Brotherhood Postponed: A Sermon by Rabbi Maurice Davis (March 26, 1965)"
  11. ^ "The Art of Hoping: A Mother’s Story", Cultic Studies Journal, Michael Langone, Ph.D.
  12. ^ Coming Out of Scientology: The Nightmare Ends, The Nightmare Begins
  13. ^ Masters and Slaves: The Tragedy of Jonestown, Fanita English, M.S.W., September 1, 1996 Vol.1, no.2, Idea, ISSN 1532-1712

External links




Cults, Intel and Mind Control (Brainwashing)


AMERICAN FREE PRESS
Psy-Ops Standard Fare for U.S.
• CIA, Mossad have been dabbling in mind control for decades
• Secret U.S. documents reveal infatuation with “brainwashing”


by Michael Collins Piper
Recent articles in AMERICAN FREE PRESS about “mind control” have led some readers to dismiss the topic as a “conspiracy theory” bordering on science fiction.
In fact, there are several carefully documented books on the history of mind-control experimentation demonstrating that not only the CIA but also Israel’s Mossad and the Soviet KGB long engaged in extensive experimentation in this arena.
And don’t forget: In its simplest form, mind control is basically old-fashioned hypnosis. There are few who deny hypnotic states can be induced.
One of the earliest known “experts” in this bizarre science was George Estabrooks, chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University, who worked for the War Department in World War II. In his book Hypnosis, Estabrooks described the importance of mind control for use in intelligence operations:
First, there is no danger of the agent selling out. More important would be the conviction of innocence which the man himself had. . . . He would never “act guilty” and if ever accused of seeking information would be quite honestly indignant. This conviction of innocence . . . is perhaps his greatest safeguard under questioning by authorities. Finally, it would be impossible to “third degree” him and so pick up the links of a chain.
Estabrooks said people under mind control could be encouraged to engage in “fifth column” activities: “Through them, we would hope to be kept informed of the activities of their ‘friends,’ this information, of course, being obtained in the trance state.”
During the 1950s the newly established CIA, the Mossad and the KGB began heavy-duty research in this field. The CIA’s mind control project—initially code-named “Bluebird” and then “Artichoke”—eventually became MK-ULTRA.
However, it wasn’t until 1975—in the midst of a controversial inquiry into the CIA conducted by then-Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho)—that the first details about the CIA’s mind-control ventures reached public attention.
Until then, Americans believed only “Communists” and “Nazis” engaged in unpleasant experiments to manipulate human behavior.
In the wake of the Senate hearings, former State Department officer John D. Marks, co-author—with former high-ranking CIA official Victor Marchetti—of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence (the first book censored prior to publication by the CIA) undertook his own in-depth research into CIA mind-control operations.
Utilizing the Freedom of Information Act, Marks pried 16,000 pages of documents out of the CIA and in 1979 published his book, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, subtitled “The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to Control Human Behavior.” Issued by a subdivision of The New York Times and no “extremist tract” by any estimation, Marks’s book remains the standard on this subject.
Marks revealed that the impetus for the CIA’s mind-control operations came from Richard Helms, who later became CIA director. Helms’s idea was approved by then-CIA chief Allen Dulles. Under the supervision of James Angleton, the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence and devoted CIA liaison to Israel’s Mossad, chief of operations for the experiments was Sidney Gottlieb, the director of the CIA’s technical services section, TSS.
According to Marks, in June 1960 Gottlieb launched an expanded program of operational experiments in hypnosis in cooperation with the CIA’s counterintelligence [CI] staff who believed the hypnosis program could provide “a potential breakthrough in clandestine technology.”
The MK-ULTRA staff focused on developing mind-control techniques in the laboratory while CIA operators handled “field experimentation” in order to achieve three goals, as described by
Marks: “(1) to induce hypnosis very rapidly in unwitting subjects; (2) to create durable amnesia; and (3) to implant durable and operationally useful posthypnotic suggestions.”
Among the “additional avenues to the control of human behavior” Gottlieb found appropriate to investigate were “radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances and paramilitary devices and materials.”
The New York Times reported on Sept. 20, 1977 that, for over a decade, the CIA carried out tests in New York and San Francisco in which prostitutes—“perhaps men as well as women”—lured unsuspecting subjects to “safe houses” where they “were offered cocktails laced with various chemicals while unseen CIA officials observed, photographed and recorded their reactions.”
In 1975 the CIA admitted experiments were conducted at the Federal Addiction Research Center in Lexington, Ky. involving the administration of hallucinogens to prisoner volunteers. A key figure at the Lexington operation was the base chaplain, Rabbi Maurice Davis, who later emerged as an operative of the Anti-Defamation League, an arm of Israel’s Mossad.
Considering all of this, it’s no surprise that mind-control dabblers have been intensely interested in so-called “cults” that have existed in virtually every culture, in one form or another. That cult members—popularly said to be “brainwashed”—are pliable and do what their masters tell them has made cults and their members special targets of the CIA and Mossad.
For years it’s been openly speculated that one of today’s best-known cults—the Unification Church—was actually created by the CIA, using CIA assets inside Korean intelligence.
There is solid evidence another well-known cult was taken over at its highest level by a clique of Jewish lawyers and that since then the cult’s vast worldwide financial (and membership) resources have been utilized on behalf of the Mossad agenda.
Generally from all walks of life—whether working inside banks, telephone companies, historical revisionist institutes, government agencies or fastfood restaurants—cult members are thus available for deployment when higher-ups (operating under the direction of CIA or Mossad controllers) want to use them in some particular operation.
How many “lone gunmen” exploited by the media to promote gun control were actually subjected to mind control is a question that may never be answered, but the bottom line is this: Mind control is for real.
—— Michael Collins Piper is a world-renowned author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, the United States. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth: Huey Long vs Wall Street, The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within, Target: Traficant and The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb. You can order any of these books with a credit card by calling AFP/FAB toll free at 1-888-699-6397 or calling FAB direct at 202-547-5585 to inquire about pricing and Shipping and Handling fees.





THE JUDAS GOATS
THE ENEMY WITHIN

by Michael Collins Piper

Chapter Twenty-Four
Intelligence Agency Manipulation
of the Science of Mind Control
And Exploitation of the Cult Phenomenon:
A Very Real Tactic of The Enemy Within
In light of speculation that Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was subjected at one time or another to some form of “mind control,”it is worth reviewing some of the solid evidence which demonstrates that extensive experimentation in the field of mind control has been conducted by not only the CIA and its allies in Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, but also by the Soviet KGB and other agencies.
The subject of mind control un-nerves many people who dismiss the topic as some form of “science fiction” or “conspiracy theory.”
However, the truth is that mind control—in perhaps its simplest form—is nothing more than old-fashioned hypnosis—and there are few who deny that hypnotic states can be induced.
There are several well-written and thoroughly-researched books that have examined the history of mind control experimentation and technology.
One of the earliest known “experts” in the bizarre science of mind control was George Estabrooks, chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University who came to Washington to work for the War Department in World War II. In his book Hypnosis, Estabrooks described how important mind-control could be for use in intelligence operations. ”First,” he wrote:
There is no danger of the agent selling out. More important would be the conviction of innocence which the man himself had, and this is a great aid in many situations. He would never “act guilty” and if ever accused of seeking information would be quite honestly indignant. This conviction of innocence on the part of a criminal is perhaps his greatest safeguard under questioning by authorities. Finally, it would be impossible to ‘third degree’ him and so pick up the links of a chain.
Estabrooks said that people under mind-control can be encouraged to engage in so-called “fifth column” activities. “Through them,” he wrote, “we would hope to be kept informed of the activities of their ‘friends,’ this information, of course, being obtained in the trance state.”
Following Estabrooks’ pioneering work, it was during the 1950s that the newly-formed CIA (and its allies in Israel’s Mossad)—as well as the Soviet KGB—began heavy-duty research in this field.
Perhaps the most authoritative work examining the CIA’s activity is The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, subtitled “The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to Control Human Behavior.” First published in 1979, the book was very rare and only recently went back into print. Certainly no “extremist tract,” the book was first published by a subdivision of no less than the prestigious New York Times.The author was John Marks, best known as the co-author, with flamboyant former high-ranking CIA official Victor Marchetti, of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, the first book ever censored prior to publication by the CIA.
(Marks’ book title was a play on the title of a famous 1958 Richard Condon novel—later a popular motion picture—The Manchurian Candidate. In Condon’s horrifying scenario, an American soldier is brainwashed by the communists during the Korean War, falsely set up as a “war hero,” and later manipulated in an assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
(It turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known “anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting communism—truly The Enemy Within.The mind-control victim never knows he is being manipulated—until it is too late.)
Marks’s book was not a novel. Instead, Marks’ study was based largely on some 16,000 pages of documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act.
Several years before Marks’ book came out, the first details about the CIA’s adventures in this bizarre field reached the pages of daily newspapers in the wake of a controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA.
Until then, Americans believed that only the “Communists” and the “Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant experiments to study the process of manipulating human behavior.
In truth, the CIA had delved into mind control beginning just shortly after its creation in 1947.The CIA’s mind control project was initially known as “Bluebird” and then later expanded into “Artichoke” by 1953.
The overall code name for the operation became known as MK-ULTRA.
The impetus for the CIA’s mind-control operations came from Richard Helms who went on to head the CIA’s entire clandestine operations program, and then become CIA director. Helms’ idea was approved by then-CIA chief Allen Dulles who gave the go-ahead for the project. Chief of operations for the experiments was the chief of the agency’s technical services section (TSS), one Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, although he was under the supervision of James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence and the Israeli Mossad’s devoted liaison at the CIA.
According to Marks, in June 1960 [Gottlieb’s] TSS officials launched an expanded program of operational experiments in hypnosis in cooperation with the CIA’s Counterintelligence [CI] staff:
Counterintelligence officials wrote that the hypnosis program could provide a ‘potential breakthrough in clandestine technology.’Their arrangement with TSS was that the MK-ULTRA men would develop the technique in the laboratory, while they took care of ‘field experimentation.’ The Counterintelligence program had three goals: (1) to induce hypnosis very rapidly in unwitting subjects; (2) to create durable amnesia; and (3) to implant durable and operationally useful posthypnotic suggestions.
Marks noted that the CIA’s prime locale for its mind-control experiments was Mexico City.The Mexican capital was, during the Cold War period, according to all accounts, the Western Hemisphere’s primary nest of international intelligence intrigue. It was in Mexico City where—as we’ve noted—E. Howard Hunt served as the CIA’s station chief and one of his CIA lieutenants was none other than future pundit,William F. Buckley, Jr.,who emerged as a leading figure in the effort to bend traditional American conservatism toward internationalism. Mexico City was also a major base of operations for Israel’s Mossad.
According to formerly secret CIA documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, among the “additional avenues to the control of human behavior” that Gottlieb’s operatives found appropriate to investigate were “radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances and paramilitary devices and materials.”
The New York Times reported on September 20, 1977 that “The documents show that the tests were carried out in New York City and San Francisco between 1953 and 1966, in CIA ‘safe houses,’ mainly apartments and motel rooms, that were secretly rented for the agency by an official of the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics, since supplanted by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
“Prostitutes, perhaps men as well as women, may have been employed to lure the subjects to the safe houses, where they were offered cocktails laced with various chemicals while unseen CIA officials observed, photographed and recorded their reactions.”
The CIA is also known to have conducted drug experiments with drug addicts held at a federal facility. In 1975 the CIA formally admitted that experiments were conducted at the Federal Addiction Research Center in Lexington, Kentucky, involving the administration of drugs, including hallucinogens, to prisoner volunteers.
One prisoner, James H. Childs, testified to a Senate committee of inquiry that the prisoners who participated in the CIA program were paid by the CIA in the form of addictive drugs.
Another former prisoner who testified, Edward M. Flowers, said that LSD was given to prisoners in cookies during experiments. From 1952 to 1955, he said, prisoners were allowed to take their pay for being in the programs in either drugs or time off their sentences.
One of the key figures at the CIA’s Lexington, Kentucky operation was the on-base chaplain, Rabbi Maurice Davis who, in later years, emerged as a widely-known operative of the Anti-Defamation League, the politically influential American-based intelligence and propaganda arm of Israel’s secret service, the Mossad.
Other experiments in drug-induced mind-control were conducted at the Vacaville prison facility in California. It was there, according to one witness, that Donald DeFreeze, later head of the violent terrorist group, the Symbionese Liberation Army, told another inmate that he, too, was part of the CIA’s mind-control experiments.
DeFreeze and his gang later kidnapped Patty Hearst of the Hearst publishing empire and brought her into their criminal activities. Later Miss Hearst’s attorneys said they believed she showed signs of being under the influence of drugs.
Considering all of this, it is no surprise that the CIA and the Mossad have long had a particular interest in the phenomenon of cults, which have long been in existence in virtually every culture, in one form or another. Cult members are typically very pliable and willing to do whatever their masters tell them.
And this is one reason why the CIA and the Mossad have been especially determined to gain control of cult groups at the highest levels and thereby use those cults—and their members—to advance their own agendas.
In addition, there is widespread speculation that some of the best known cults today—such as the infamous Unification Church of Sun Myung Moon, to name just one—are actually outright creations of state intelligence services. In another case, a group of Zionist lawyers, largely based in California, are known to have grabbed control, at the highest levels, behind the scenes, of another well-known “religious” organization—called a “church”by its members but often described as a “cult” by its critics—and utilized the vast financial (and membership) resources of that cult for their own purposes.
Here’s how the mind control operations of the CIA and the Mossad (utilizing cult groups) work:While these intelligence agencies actually control the cults, the lower-level cult members do not know, of course, that they are now part of a highly-sophisticated intelligence-based mindcontrol operation.
While the cult members are completely subservient to their higher-ups, subject to their discipline, the cult members, naturally, are from all walks of life and some reach high positions of influence within the companies and organizations in which they work in their day-to-day life outside the cult. However they always remain loyal because of the “brainwashing” process to which they have been subjected.
Sometimes the cult members are open about their cult membership.
Other times—for strategic reasons—they do not reveal their cult affiliation, if the cult association could hinder the “black op” underway.
Whether the cult members are employed by political groups, historical revisionist research institutes, banks, insurance companies, government agencies, or even fast-food restaurants,they will always be available for deployment when their higher-ups in the cult (operating at the behest of the CIA or the Mossad) make the decision to carry out some particular intelligence operation.
For example: suppose a member of a Mossad-controlled cult is employed by a maverick, dissident political group which is considered dangerous to the Establishment. If the Mossad wishes to undermine that organization, it will utilize its control of the cult to manipulate that individual to work to wreck the organization from within.
Liberty Lobby, the populist institution that published The Spotlight until Liberty Lobby was driven into bankruptcy and destroyed by a corrupt federal judge in 2001, had its own unpleasant experiences with the operatives of one cult.
Over a period of many years, admitted, overt operatives of the cult made friendly contact with Liberty Lobby.
The cult members supplied Liberty Lobby with hard-hitting and factual information about corrupt activities within the federal government.
Behind-the-scenes, however, the cultists were working to disrupt the work of Liberty Lobby on other fronts.
A cult member (Matthew Peter Balic)—who did not reveal his membership in the cult—frequently attended Liberty Lobby meetings, visited Liberty Lobby headquarters, and socialized with Liberty Lobby employees, gaining their confidence.
(This was the same modus operandi of the infamous Roy Edward Bullock, now exposed as a long-time operative of the CIA-allied, Israeli Mossad-controlled Anti-Defamation League.)
After some time, however, it became apparent that Balic, ostensibly a friend of Liberty Lobby, was, in fact, trying to undermine the populist institution and its weekly newspaper in a wide variety of ways. It was not until later that Liberty Lobby’s suspicions were confirmed and Balic's affiliation with the cult was exposed.
Liberty Lobby learned that Balic was a former alcoholic who joined the cult and then reformed. In the process, however, Balic became subject to the cult’s discipline (and its controllers) and emerged as one of the cult’s key national intelligence operatives, in this case deployed against Liberty Lobby.
It was precisely at the time that Liberty Lobby learned that Balic was a cult operative that the previously-friendly other members of the cult (who had openly acknowledged their affiliation) abruptly broke off all contact with Liberty Lobby.
Later, the cult played a special role in a broad-ranging conspiracy that resulted in the destruction of Liberty Lobby.
But the role of cults in the world of intelligence intrigue is something that few understand or know about.
In another case, it was revealed that a Justice Department special task force was investigating charges that a notorious cult known as “the Finders”was used by the CIA as a front group during the 1980’s.
What makes the intelligence agency’s reported link to this particular cult especially troubling is that the Finders have been accused of engaging in Satanic rituals, child abuse and pornography. Federal authorities were also trying to determine whether the CIA impeded state and local investigations of child abuse within the cult in order to protect its own intelligence operations.
The CIA, never known to own up to its own misdeeds, responded to the charges by saying, “Most days we expect our share of unusual questions, but his one is clear off the wall. Any claim that we obstructed justice in this case is nuts.”
A CIA spokesman, David Christian, admitted, however, that it had sent some of its agents to a company called Future Enterprises, Inc. for computer training. However, according to Christian, the nation’s crack intelligence agency did not know about connections between the computer company and the Finders cult.
Christian claimed that the company “was in no sense a CIA front or ever owned or operated by anyone for the CIA.”
However, the president of Future Enterprises, Joseph Marinich, admitted that his company was under contract to the CIA for computer training. Marinich admitted, further, that his tax accountant, R. Gardner Terrell,was a Finders member.
Finders cult members claimed that Terrell’s work for Future Enterprises had nothing to do with his membership in the cult.
Finally, an April 13, 1987 report by a Customs Service Agent who was investigating the Finders cult said that the CIA “admitted to owning the Finders organization as a front for a domestic computer training operation but that it had ‘gone bad.’”
(In other words, the CIA had been using the Finders as a front, but that the cult members had become engaged in activities beyond the control of the CIA and, as such, had “gone bad.’)
Clearly, the use of “mind control” in general, as well as the secret control and manipulation of cults, by the CIA and the Mossad and myriad other evil-doers has a very real (and ugly) history that many people are too eager to discredit as “science fiction” or “conspiracy theories.”
Mind control is a fact.
It is another mechanism used by The Enemy Within to wage war against political dissidents in America.The next time you hear someone claim that he has an “implant,” put in his head by the CIA, don’t dismiss what he’s saying out of hand. For it may very well be true.
How many “lone assassins,”“lone bombers,”“right-wing racist gunmen,” and other such poster boys for the media monopoly in America to exploit have been subjected to some form of mind control is a question that may never be answered, but the bottom line is this:
Mind control is for real.



Conférences Macy et nouvel ordre mondial: de la lutte à l'antisémitisme aux réseaux cybernétiques

Sur la scientologie:

L'escroc Mark Weber, qui a subverti l'IHR avec ses alliés scientologues, doit céder la direction de l'Institute for Historical Review

Le conseiller-stratégiste clé de Palin est une figure importante au sein d'une organisation tentaculaire contrôlée par les Bronfman: la scientologie

Audio de Michael Jackson, attaqué par une secte tentaculaire juive et scientologique

Le vaillant docteur Hamer contre la pieuvre de la Sciento-Mossad-ologie

Comment Hitler s'est servi de Schacht

En complément à notre liste de mythes et de propagateurs de mythes sur les nazis, nous noterons au passage que l'historien David Irving n'est pas le seul à avoir noté l'opposition entre Schacht et Hitler: "Franz Halder and Hjalmar Schacht, prewar governor of the Reichsbank, were also pulled in, as their opposition to Hitler was well documented" (David Irving, Hitler's War).

Au sujet de l'opposition entre Hitler et Schacht et plus spécifiquement sur comment Schacht a été utilisé par l'administration Hitler pour remettre les gens au travail et remettre l'économie sur pied, avant d'être éjecté de son poste et surveillé par la gestapo (Hitler contrôlait alors directement la banque centrale), lire cet extrait.

Léon Degrelle aussi a écrit, en 1992 pour le journal de l'IHR, sur comment Hitler voyait Schacht. Il savait à quel genre de capitaliste international il avait affaire...

Similarly, he did not hesitate to keep on competent bureaucrats chosen by his predecessors. A good example was Dr. Otto Meissner, who had headed the presidential chancellery under the socialist Ebert and the conservative von Hindenburg, and who had done everything in his power, up to the last minute, to torpedo Hitler's accession to power. But Meissner knew his work, and Hitler wisely kept him on the job. Hitler treated him with respect and confidence, and Meissner served the the Föhrer faithfully and efficiently for twelve years.
Perhaps the most remarkable such case is that of Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the most discerning and competent of Germany's financiers in 1933. A Hitler supporter? By no means! Schacht never was and never would be a supporter of anyone but himself. But he was the best in the business: for getting the Reich's economy moving again, he had no equal.
Ten years earlier, at the of 1923, Schacht had financially rescued the Weimar Republic by helping to invent the "Rentenmark." He was shrewd and imaginative, and thus capable of understanding and implementing the boldest of Hitler's plans.
Schacht's personal ambition was immense, but this was yet another reason for Hitler to give him every possibility to rise as high as he could. Within weeks of taking power, Hitler appointed him President of the Reichsbank, and then, a year later, as Economics Minister as well. Schacht couldn't be happier.
Dangerous? Of course! Doubly so, inasmuch as Schacht was a capitalist to the core, with close ties to major foreign banking interests, not excluding Jewish financiers in London and New York. Moreover, Schacht cared little for Hitler's revolutionary program, which regarded labor as the true source of national wealth.
Hitler called on the brilliant Dr. Schacht to devise new ways of acquiring the funds necessary for what he inted to accomplish. That was a great deal, but it was all. The collaboration went no further: Schacht was never permitted to intervene in political matters. When Schacht's financial formulas had served their purpose, the collaboration would. Until he was dismissed as Reichsbank president in 1939, Hitler made good use of his extraordinary talents. But Schacht never forgave his dismissal, and would nurse a seething resentment.
Determined to conjure up billions of marks as quickly as possible, and by any means available, in early February 1933 Hitler summoned Schacht's predecessor as Reichsbank president, Dr. Hans Luther, to his office. Luther, who had been appointed to his post in 1930 by a previous administration, had old-fashioned views of extreme prudence in the management of state funds. Since the state's coffers were nearly empty, he was all the more prudent. His detachable collar, stiff as a calling card, proclaimed the rigidity of his principles. He belonged to the old school of accountants who spend a dollar only when they have a dollar.
Hitler was well aware that this capable man was not happy to be presiding over a central bank that lacked funds. It was not, however, to have Luther empty the state treasury that Hitler had summoned him, but to ask him to devise new means of financing Germany's recovery.
It was a question of imagination, but Luther's brain was not a volcano of new ideas; it was a calculator.
"How much money," Hitler asked him, "can you put at my disposal for creating jobs?" Luther Hesitated to respond immediately; his mental calculator began functioning. After working out the calculations in his mind, he responded as though speaking to the director of a large financial firm: "One hundred and fifty million."
An eloquent answer, it showed just how completely Hitler's predecessors and their colleagues were lacking in their understanding of the scope of the resources that would be needed to save the Reich. One hundred and fifty million, at a time when the German government was pouring a billion marks every three months into unemployment benefits alone!
With a budget of 150 million marks, the German treasury would have been hard put to spare even three or four marks a day to the five or six or seven million unemployed over one short week.
Clearly, this question had never been put to Dr. Luther, and no Reich leader before Hitler had ever troubled to learn how to go about raising the funds that would be indispensable for carrying out a serious program to put Germany back to work.
Obviously, then, Dr. Luther was not the person to put Hitler's program into effect. The new Chancellor then thought of Schacht, the sly old fox. He was always good for a trick, and now Hitler needed some of his magic.
"Herr Schacht," he said, "we are assuredly in agreement on one point: no other single task facing the government at the moment can be so truly urgent as conquering unemployment. That will take a lot of money. Do you see any possibility of finding it apart from the Reichsbank?" And after a moment, he added: "How much would it take? Do you have any idea?"
Wishing to win Schacht over by appealing to his ambition, Hitler smiled and then asked: "Would you be willing to once again assume presidency of the Reichsbank?" Schacht let on that he had a sentimental concern for Dr. Luther, and did not want to hurt the incumbent's feelings. Playing along, Hitler reassured Schacht that he would find an appropriate new job elsewhere for Luther.
Schacht then pricked up his ears, drew himself up, and focused his big round eyes on Hitler: "Well, if that's the way it is," he said, "then I am ready to assume the presidency of the Reichsbank again."
His great dream was being realized. Schacht had been president of the Reichsbank between 1923 and 1930, but had been dismissed. Now he would return in triumph. He felt vindicated. Within weeks, the ingenious solution to Germany's pressing financial woes would burst forth from his inventive brain.
"It was necessary," Schacht later explained, "to discover a method that would avoid inflating the investment holdings of the Reichsbank immoderately and consequently increasing the circulation of money excessively."
"Therefore," he went on, "I had to find some means of getting the sums that were lying idle in pockets and banks, without meaning for it to be long term and without having it undergo the risk of depreciation. That was the reasoning behind the Mefo bonds."
What were these "Mefo" bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a startup capitalization of one billion marks - which Hitler and Schacht arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens, Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall - this company would eventually promote many billions of marks worth of investment.
Enterprises, old and new, that filled government orders had only to draw drafts on Mefo for the amounts due. These drafts, when presented to the Reichsbank, were immediately convertible into cash. The success of the Mefo program depended entirely on public acceptance of the Mefo bonds. But the wily Schacht had planned well. Since Mefo bonds were short-term bonds that could be cashed in at any time, there was no real risk in buying, accepting or holding them. They bore an interest of four percent - a quite acceptable figure in those days - whereas banknotes hidden under the mattress earned nothing. The public quickly took all this into consideration and eagerly accepted the bonds.
While the Reichsbank was able to offer from its own treasury a relatively insignificant 150 million marks for Hitler's war on unemployment, in just four years the German public subscribed more than 12 billion marks worth of Mefo bonds!
These billions, the fruit of the combined imagination, ingenuity and astuteness of Hitler and Schacht, swept away the temporizing and fearful conservatism of the bankers. Over the next four years, this enormous credit reserve would make miracles possible.
Soon after the initial billion-mark credit, Schacht added another credit of 600 million in order to finance the start of Hitler's grand program for highway construction. This Autobahn program provided immediate work for 100,000 of the unemployed, and eventually assured wages for some 500,000 workers.
As large as this outlay was, it was immediately offset by a corresponding cutback in government unemployment benefits, and by the additional tax revenue generated as a result of the increase in living standard (sping) of the newly employed.
Within a few months, thanks to the credit created by the Mefo bonds, private industry once again dared to assume risks and expand. Germans returned to work by the hundreds of thousands.
Was Schacht solely responsible for this extraordinary turnaround? After the war, he answered for himself as a Nuremberg Tribunal defendant, where he was charged with having made possible the Reich's economic revival:
















I don't think Hitler was reduced to begging for my help. If I had not served him, he would have found other methods, other means. He was not a man to give up. It's easy enough for you to say, Mr. Prosecutor, that I should have watched Hitler die and not lifted a finger. But the entire working class would have died with him!

Even Marxists recognized Hitler's success, and their own failure. In the June 1934 issue of the Zeitschrift für Sozialismus, the journal of the German Social Democrats in exile, this acknowledgement appears:
















Faced with the despair of proletarians reduced to joblessness, of young people with diplomas and no future, of the middle classes of merchants and artisans condemned to bankruptcy, and of farmers terribly threatened by the collapse in agricultural prices, we all failed. We weren't capable of offering the masses anything but speeches about the glory of socialism.

Lire aussi Hitler Democrat, de Léon Degrelle:











Aussi, nous recommandons fortement la lecture de Who Financed Hitler, dans lequel James et Suzanne Pool révèlent que le rival politique d'Hitler, Georg Strasser a été financé par un certain financier juif du nom de Paul Silverberg, et ce afin d'empêcher Hitler d'arriver au pouvoir. Antony Sutton (Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler), de son côté, se base sur une fraude "Hitler's Secret Backers" (du faux auteur Sydney Warburg). Plus de détails sur cette piste de recherche... Lire Réfutation de la thèse d'Anthony Sutton qui soutient que "Wall Street a financé Hitler", par Ivor Benson ('The Zionist Factor: The Jewish Impact on Twentieth Century History').

Nul besoin d'invoquer des finances occultes pour expliquer le boum économique hitlérien, ses mesures de solidarité économique suffisent amplement! Lire à ce sujet La révolution européenne, de Francis Delaisi.

Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP, by V.K. Clarke

Chamberlain 1939 : "C'est l'Amérique et le monde israélite international qui nous ont précipités dans la guerre."

VIDEO - Contre la haute finance, le national-socialisme






Sur ce blog:

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Un humoriste contre le "nouvel ordre mondial" des Terminators nazis qui ont fait taire et tué les pôvres juifs

Le jeu des comparaisons: l'islamisme radical est-il plus proche du nazisme ou des "inglourious basterds"?

Adolf le Grand diffamé par des "nationalistes" -- Y a-t-il un autre homme dans l'histoire, à part peut-être Jésus, qui ait été à ce point calomnié?

De l'incohérence d'attribuer à Adolf Hitler et à l'Holocauste la paternité de l'État juif en Palestine: la "mémoire de l'Holocauste" n'a pris d'assaut la psyché américaine que dans les années 1960-70, dans la foulée du procès Eichmann et des guerres israéliennes. Les Sionistes les plus influents de l'époque ont eu grand peur que l'extermination des juifs d'Europe sonne le glas du sionisme. Quel intérêt peut-il y avoir à systématiquement assimiler le sionisme aux nazis? Faire croire que c'est toujours la faute aux nazis? Et à qui cela profite-t-il?

Le mythe des origines juives d'Hitler et de plusieurs membres importants du gouvernement nazi

Bush, Rockefeller, Rothschild et Hitler

Le devoir de mémoire: source de motivation pour Alex Jones dans son combat, fondement du nouvel ordre mondial pour le B'nai Brith

REPÉRÉ: Un saboteur à la tête du "mouvement" pour la vérité

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste des Rothschild

Du mythe des "nazis pro-Israël" et de ceux qui voient des complots partout...

Les nazis ont fait la vie dure aux Rothschild, confisqué leurs avoirs

Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale

Gertrude Stein, juive: "le Nobel de la paix à Hitler!"

Le jeu des comparaisons: des ressemblances entre la période actuelle et celle précédant l'arrivée d'Hitler au pouvoir

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Gordon Duff décline l'invitation de Carolyn Yeager sous prétexte qu'elle ignore que la "connexion Bush-nazis"

Duff a tort sur l’Holocauste et les prétendus liens Bush-Hitler

Une contre-vérité tenace: « Prescott Bush, un nazi! »

jeudi 29 septembre 2011

Les arrières-plans occultes du "nouvel ordre mondial"

Imaginez un instant ce que l'Europe serait devenue si les troupes allemandes n'avaient été là pour refouler l'Armée Rouge...

Un jour, l'histoire reconnaîtra ce que l'humanité toute entière leur doit.



+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


http://spfc441.blogspot.com

dimanche 25 septembre 2011

La Conjuration contre l'Esprit




Une des bases conceptuelles de la compréhension anthroposophique du monde au 20ème siècle tient tout entière dans les déclarations de Rudolf Steiner sur ce que je désignais dans un précédent article comme la « tenaille maçonnique » de la conjuration occidentale des loges anglo-saxonnes avec le bolchévisme oriental à partir de 1917. En d'autres termes la destruction de l'Europe du centre en tant que force de liaison entre les sphères franco-britannique de ce que nous appelons l'âme de conscience et le futur foyer de ce qui est appelé à naître un jour en Russie comme le Moi supérieur humain, fruit d'une clairvoyance spirituelle entièrement individualisée.
Ce n'est pas le lieu de rappeler ici en détail le développement des trois forces de l'âme humaine au cours des millénaires – en âme de sensation, de raison et de conscience – et ce qui est appelé à voir le jour dans l'avenir comme l'élément véritablement spirituel de l'homme en lien direct avec ce que l'Europe orientale a toujours reconnu comme la Sophia, la Sagesse divine inspiratrice (la Vierge omniprésente des icônes russes depuis la christianisation). C'est un point d'ordre occulte que l'on ne peut éluder ici, tant il est à l'origine de ce qui s'est tramé dans les loges noires occidentales en vue de paralyser à tout jamais la naissance de cette future nature spirituelle en gestation sur le sol russe. Car c'est de la seule culture d'une Europe centrale pleinement mature que l'âme russe se trouvera à même, un jour, de faire naître en elle l'Esprit nouveau de la future sixième époque post-atlantéenne : celle de la slavité que l'Apocalypse de Jean décrit comme celle de la fraternité de Philadelphie de l'ère du Verseau.
Skull & Bones 322
C'est en vue de paralyser à tout jamais cette évolution – et à toutes fins de pérenniser le leadership de leur empire – que fut élaboré, par les loges en question, dès la fin du XIXè siècle, ce projet de transformer, aux dires mêmes de Steiner et des documents maçonniques par lui présentés, l'ensemble de l'Europe de l'est en « Champs d'expérience socialiste » pour reprendre les termes mêmes de leur plan, stérilisant de facto tout avenir civilisé dans ces régions. Ce fut l'œuvre, on le sait, de Lénine (introduit comme un bacille dans le corps russe au terme d'une traversée de l'Allemagne au fond d'un wagon plombé) de devenir l'instigateur désigné de ce bolchévisme marxiste qui devait écraser la Russie et la moitié de l'Europe pour 72 années d'oppression satanique sans nul exemple en Russie, hormis celle des Mongols et des Tatars au XIIIè siècle.
C'est cet homme de paille que les Loges anglo-américaines introduisirent en 1917 comme un cheval de Troie pestiféré dans la vieille Russie orthodoxe en vue de réaliser leurs plans d'hégémonie mondiale : annihiler la Russie en la recoupant de l'Allemagne, cette Allemagne qui se bat alors sur deux fronts. Un an plus tard, le 3 mars 1918, c'est le traité de Brest-Litovsk. Steiner rédige son Memorandum exposant la Tripartition Sociale que le comte Otto Lerchenfeld remet au ministre allemand des Affaires Etrangères von Kühlmann en vue de la présenter en ultime recours d'une paix sociale durable en face des fallacieux 14 Points de Woodrow Wilson. Kühlmann renonce au dernier moment, et c'est la désastreuse République de Weimar que le social-démocrate Scheidemann accouche en définitive dans la confusion la plus totale, entre la terreur spartakiste et les multiples divergences des différentes tendances nationalistes. Le 28 juin 1919, c'est le non moins désastreux Traité de Versailles qui mettait l'Allemagne à genoux et la plongeait pour quinze ans dans la plus noire misère. Le mark s'effondre en 1922 et la famine éclate, la tyrannie bolchévique grandit à l'est comme sur le sol allemand. On connait les horreurs bolchéviques des Bela Kun, Kovaks, Bergfeld, Reinheimer et autre Szamuely, curieusement tous juifs et qui feront rapidement des émules en Allemagne, ou ce qui en reste.
L'Europe se retrouve dès lors prise en étau entre l'impérialisme économique américain totalement sous contrôle de la haute Finance asociale et vorace à l'ouest – et la tyrannie communiste anti-humaine et criminelle à l'est. Entre les deux l'Allemagne-Autriche dépecée comme une viande au profit d'une nuée de spéculateurs rapaces de tous horizons dans une inflation phénoménale au bord d'une quasi guerre civile. Le crime et l'insécurité se répandent, l'économie s'effondre. C'est alors, on le sait, que le Maréchal Hindenburg confie le pouvoir au chancelier Hitler avec mission de remettre le pays à flot. Une bagatelle ! Et le plus extraordinaire est qu'il y parvint.
Je n'apprendrai rien à personne en disant que la plupart des anthroposophes actuels pas tous – se rallient aujourd'hui au consensus bien-pensant d'après guerre selon lequel, à compter de cette date, le 3ème Reich qui se fonde alors ne restera dans l'Histoire qu'un calamiteux entracte dont seule la providentielle intervention désintéressée des bons Alliés d'outre-atlantique et de Moscou parvint à nous libérer. Faut-il admettre les yeux fermés ce conte de nourrice ?
Replaçons-nous pour ce faire dans le véritable contexte de l'époque : la famine, six millions de chômeurs, la révolution dedans et l'industrie par terre, le pays dépecé du tiers de son territoire et l'ennemi aux portes comme à l'intérieur : que pouvait faire le nouveau gouvernement ? La république parlementaire avait failli, vendu le pays, conduit l'économie à la ruine et installé partout les politiciens agioteurs à la solde de Londres et de Wall-Street, une police impuissante et une armée réduite aux armes de papier-carton face aux bandes spartakistes gavées de matériel de guerre récupéré. Hitler fit la seule et unique chose qui se pouvait faire en pareil chaos : restaurer de toute urgence le pouvoir de l'Etat. Les pleins pouvoirs pour ce faire lui sont accordés à une très large majorité des parlementaires (n'en déplaise aux mauvaises langues) et lui permettent de prendre d'emblée les premiers décrets parant au plus urgent : sortir le plus vite possible de l'étalon-or et fonder la renaissance du pays, non plus sur la banque et la spéculation, mais sur le Capital-Travail.
Et c'est bien cela – et rien d'autre – qui fut la cause véritable de la guerre (de cette guerre à laquelle l'Allemagne, contrairement à ses adversaires, n'était pas préparée) pas le salmigondis droit-de-l'hommesque que l'on enseigne aux naïfs.
Les points Godwin se distribuent, de nos jours, d'autant plus à tour de bras que toute remise en cause des attendus du « tribunal » de Nuremberg est purement et simplement interdite et que l'on peut taper d'autant plus fort sur le vaincu qu'il n'a même pas le droit de répondre. Pour en rester sur le plan de l'anthroposophie, la plupart des auteurs s'empressent, en particulier, d'évoquer un texte de Rudolf Steiner en date du 3 avril 1920 renvoyant dos à dos marxisme-léninisme et nationalismes, comme étant, ceux-ci d'inspiration plutôt luciférienne, et celui-là de nature clairement ahrimanienne, autrement dit satanique. Ce qu'il soulignait encore dès 1917 en rappelant, à juste titre, que « le véritable idéal devrait-être puisé au monde spirituel, et non pas fondé sur le sang. » un sang, par nature, évidemment corruptible et partant exclusivement lié à la terre. Ce que le nouvel état national-socialiste lui-même admit fort bien dès l'origine en reconnaissant, dans son 24ème point – sur 25 – la liberté religieuse comme base – invariable – de son programme de gouvernement. On peut le rappeler ici in extenso :
« 24° Nous demandons la liberté de toutes les confession religieuses dans l'État, pour autant qu'elles ne mettent pas l'existence en péril ou qu'elles ne contreviennent pas aux sentiments de bienséance et de moralité de la race germanique ; le parti défend le point de vue d'un christianisme positif, sans se lier à une confession déterminée. Il combat l'esprit judéo-matérialiste en nous et en dehors de nous, et il est convaincu qu'un assainissement durable de notre peuple ne peut se produire que par l'intérieur, sur la formule : l'intérêt général avant l'intérêt particulier. »
Quel état d'aujourd'hui, y compris les plus prétendument « libéraux », peut avancer pareil engagement ?
Que la Sté Anthroposophique ait gardé une dent contre Hitler suite à l’interdiction, par le Ministère de l’Intérieur, en 1936, des ouvrages édités à Dornach et l’interdiction – en pleine guerre – de la section allemande, du fait de ses malencontreux contacts avec la Franc-Maçonnerie anglo-saxonne, ne doit pas faire illusion.
Ce que stigmatisait Steiner, ce n'était pas le fait national lui-même (dont il souligne maintes fois le caractère naturel et enrichissant pour l’Homme), mais bien l’exacerbation xénophobe du sentiment national, ce qui est bien différent.*
Car enfin, que penser du caractère viscéralement matérialiste de toutes ces pieuses démocraties qui se vouèrent à la destruction par le fer et par le feu de l'Allemagne et de ses alliés, à commencer par le Japon, jusqu'à réduire leurs villes en cendres et massacrer pêle-mêle leurs civils ? Qui, quelles troupes allèrent jusqu'à crucifier, puis violer femmes et enfants sur les portes des granges lors de leur avance en 45, sinon les hordes staliniennes de l'Armée Rouge ? Et qui, quels furent ces héros qui anéantirent en deux nuits d'holocauste – d'holocauste véritable – les 250 000 habitants – civils – de Dresde ? Ou sous le feu de l'atome ceux d'Hiroshima et de Nagazaki, sinon ces chantres des Droits de l'Homme et de la Démocratie dont on ne finirait pas d'énumérer les crimes jusqu'en Afghanistan, Iraq et Libye d'aujourd'hui, pour ne rien dire de la Serbie...
Car, en définitive, ce seront pourtant bien les armées du Reich qui empêchèrent, en 1941, l'invasion prévue de l'Armée Rouge quinze jours, à peine, avant qu'elle ne déferle sur l'Europe jusqu'à l'Atlantique ; le Russe Souvorov en administre la preuve, confirmée par le colonel Danilov dans l’Österreichische Militärische Zeitschrift de janvier 93 (cité d’ailleurs par la FAZ du 4.3.93, p. 14). Nombreuses publications là dessus depuis. 5 millions d'hommes massés sur la frontière ! Qui les aurait arrêtés si Hitler ne l'avait fait ?
Lorsqu'on voit avec quel extraordinaire degré d'hypocrisie ces choses-là se déroulent encore sous nos yeux, dans l'indifférence hypnotique des masses et le relais servile des médias, on ne peut que mesurer à quel point c'est l'avenir même de l'homme qui se joue aujourd'hui dramatiquement en coulisse et dans les couloirs feutrés des Trilatérale, Skull and Bones, Bnaï-Brith et autres CFR. D'où, plus que jamais, l'impérieuse nécessité d'enseigner quels sont les arrière-plans spirituels réels de ces abominations et d'arracher le masque de ceux qui s'en font les servants.
WH.

* http://spfc441.blogspot.com/2008/12/rudolf-steiner-la-question-raciale.html

Je n'entends pas reparler ici du livre hautement spécieux et malveillant de Christophe Lindenberg Die Technik des Bösen: Zur Vorgeschichte und Geschichte des National-Sozialismus, tant il se fonde sur un point hautement controversé d'histoire sur lequel il est, pour l'instant, interdit de s'exprimer.
0 commentaires





http://i40.servimg.com/u/f40/09/00/16/97/rudolf10.jpg



Sur ce blog:

L'Histoire contemporaine: une "fable convenue"

Le plus beau dans nos chères démocraties, c'est qu'on n'a pas à s'inquiéter pour sa liberté d'opinion et d'expression.... N'EST-CE PAS?

Les arrières-plans occultes de l'américanisation du monde







The Jewish boycott of Germany should continue inter alia "until it (the German Government) shall have restored to the Masonic Lodges the status and property of which they have been deprived." (South African Jewish Chronicle, 14th December, 1934)

Le Jewish Chronicle rapportait en décembre 1934 les propos de Samuel Untermeyer prononcés après l'adoption d'une résolution de boycott contre l'Allemagne, soulignant que le boycott continuerait "jusqu'à ce que l'Allemagne ait rendu aux loges maçonniques leurs status et propriétés dont elles ont été dépouillées".





PERHAPS THE MOST NOTABLE VICTIMS OF JEWISH BOLSHEVISM were Russian Czar Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra, and their beautiful children. They have rightly been canonized as saints by the Russian Orthodox Church. This heart-breaking account of the slaughter of this family demonstrates that there was much more at work behind the crime by the Jewish murderers than 'Just politics." The author, incidentally, is a Russian attorney who held a post in the administration of Vladimir Putin.

By Marina Marynova
The Barnes Review
May/June 2010

http://tinyurl.com/389a3fo

In the early days of the Communist state in Russia, Bolshevism was idealized by many in the West as a benevolent, almost Christ-like doctrine of charity and love for the poor and the downtrodden. Many thought it would free the oppressed and exploited; that it would unleash the promise of universal education and universal freedom; that it would usher in a new age, a utopia.
This was before the Bolshevik mass murder of the Russian intelligentsia and the initiation of the Gulag system. Communist historians themselves estimate that over 20 million Christian Russians perished and tens of millions more suffered. This was before the induced famines in Ukraine that starved to death between 7 and 11 million Ukrainians, mostly children and the elderly. It was before the Red terror swept through all of Eastern Europe and penetrated even to the heart of Europe.
For many naive souls in 1918, Communism seemed like a noble experiment of man. But the story of the murder of a truly noble man along with his loving wife and five children offered a portent to the true nature of the Communist leadership and the monumental human suffering that lay ahead.
On March 3, 1917, Nicholas II, the last czar of Russia, abdicated for himself and his son. Within hours of their abdication, the last ruling Romanovs were arrested by Bolsheviks.
By July 1918 the Romanov family was almost a year and a half in the hands of the Bolsheviks. Vladimir Lenin and Yakov Sverdlov had moved the family to Ekaterinburg, a town in the Ural Mountains, far from the main centers of Moscow and St. Petersburg, and far from the eyes of the world press and diplomatic corps.
The prisoners included Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra Feodorovna and their children: Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia and Alexei. Also included were the family doctor, Eugenie Botkin, the cook, Ivan Kharitonov, the valet, Alexei Trupp and the maid, Anna Demidova.
This was a period in which the Bolsheviks were brutally stamping out any resistance and consolidating their power over the Russian political and social establishment. In many parts of Russia they met stiff resistance from many quarters, referred to as the White Russians, as compared to the Bolshevik Red Russians, who sported the red flags of Communism.

HUMILIATING THE ROMANOVS
The Bolshevik guards treated the deposed czar and his family with a daily routine of degradation, contempt and humiliation. Drunken Bolsheviks sexually harassed the beautiful daughters of the czar and czarina, making obscene and lewd remarks and even pursuing the girls into the toilet. They belted out anti-Christian songs, which deeply offended the devoutly Christian family. Although Bolshevik officials had copious foodstuffs, they put the family on a near-starvation diet.
The family endured their misfortunes with strength and a retreat into intense family closeness and love as well as Christian prayer and study.
During the night on July 16-17, 1918, the czar, his wife and their four daughters and son were murdered by gunfire and bayonets. Their four loyal retainers were also butchered at the same time in the Ipatiev house in Ekaterinburg.
After all the prisoners gathered in the tiny cellar room, a group of Bolsheviks burst in. They announced to the Romanovs that the Soviet power decided that they should be executed.
After the announcement the gunfire began. As the smoke dispersed, it could be seen that the whole room was filled with blood and bodies. Bolsheviks at the scene said that some of the children survived the initial gunfire. The assassins then pitilessly finished off the bloodied and moaning daughters and the son with bayonets.
This was the ignoble and brutal end of the Christian Romanov czars' dynasty that had served Russia since 1613. This was not an execution, for there was no investigation or court decision. It was murder -- not only of the czar and his wife, but also of even their young children and household employees in a brutality that symbolizes the true nature of Bolshevism.
BEHIND THE SCENES
What were the driving forces that led to this murder, and to the murder of so many Christian Russians? By learning what happened here and the events surrounding this crime, a view is opened to the hatreds that could expose the Bolsheviks as the greatest mass murderers and human rights violators in the history of mankind.
In the beginning of the 20th century, Russia was involved in several wars and underwent some unsuccessful revolutions. Because of those turbulent times and many victims, radical opposition gave Nicholas II a nickname, "Nicholas the Bloody." But is it just to put all the blame on the czar for what happened to Russia? Actually, nowadays it is popular to write about Nicholas II as a bloodthirsty monarch who, despite his alleged ruthlessness, lost power to the Bolsheviks. But in fact, the last Russian czar was a pioneer in certain areas of politics and had done a lot of good for the Russian empire. If anything, he didn't fight the Bolsheviks with nearly the toughness needed to defeat these utterly ruthless revolutionaries.
[We also note that the famous reformer Czar Alexander II was murdered by the Communists in 1881. See page 55.-Ed.]
Nicholas II had no modern publicist or spin-doctor, but his patriotism appeared clearly in his deeds, though not in his words. Few leaders in history ever did more to advance the well being of the common people than did Nicholas II.
Before World War I Russia enjoyed significant economic development and growth. In 1885-1913 the growth rate of farm industry was on average 2%, and the growth rate of industry reached 4.5 to 5% per year. In the beginning of the 20th century, Russia attracted a lot of foreign capital. It was invested mainly in mining, manufacturing and engineering. Because of this favorable situation, by 1913 production volume in different branches of Russian industry was increased by a factor of five to 13. Russia was in second place in oil production worldwide, in fourth place in engineering, and fifth place in coal and iron ore extraction and steel smelting.
In 1900-1913 the aggregated agricultural output increased threefold. Russia was tops in the world in grain production.
Nicholas II implemented advanced labor legislation and significantly improved the position of Russian industrial workers. Free medical care was introduced in factories with more than 100 workers. (In 1898 such factories employed 70% of all Russian workers.) Since 1903 employers had to pay injury allowances (workmen's compensation) in the amount of 50-66% of a worker's salary. In 1912 a mandatory accident insurance was imposed in Russia. In 1900-1910 the level of unemployment did not exceed 1-2%.
In 1905 the czar made steps toward a constitutional monarchy. The Revolution in 1905 and utter defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese war forced the czar to restrict the absolute monarchy for the first time in the Romanov dynastic history. On August 6, 1905 the first representative legislative body (the state Duma) was established. Some historians see this step as a move toward liberalization and democratization of Russian society. But Nicholas II agreed upon restrictions on an absolute monarchy. The harsh events after 1905 showed that the Duma became a vanguard of legal opposition to the czar.
In 1899, Nicholas initiated the holding of the First Hague Peace Conference. In 1901 Nicholas II was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The czar stood up forcefully for arms limitation as well as for peaceful settlement of international conflicts and the codification of war laws.
Nicholas II and all members of his family were the true patriots of Russia and were deeply religious people. The last Romanov ruling family was an example of sincere love and devotion to traditional family values. Proof of this can be found in the many diaries and letters of the Romanovs.






Nicholas II was not the first Russian czar to be murdered by revolutionary Jewish terrorists. In 1881 his grandfather, Czar Alexander II, was murdered by bomb-wielding Jews who operated under the name Narodnaya Volya ("People's Will" in English). His assassination is shown above. Alexander II was very much a progressive ruler, liberal and open to reform, dedicated to serving the interests of all of the people of Russia. Ironically, Alexander's policy of openness gave freedom to the Jewish terrorists to organize and operate, resulting in his murder. As a direct consequence, many Russian patriots began turning against the Jewish people, angry at the murder of the czar. Today Jewish groups decry the retaliation against Jewish terrorism by the Russian people as "anti-Semitic pogroms." ILLUSTRATION: CMSED001251/NEWSCOM.COM

PROUD CHRISTIAN RUSSIANS
Nicholas II deeply loved the motherland and suffered for it during the Revolution. After the Bolshevik coup, it was clear that he suffered not for himself, personally, but for Russia. On March 15, 1918 the czar wrote in his diary: "How much longer will our poor Motherland be crucified and pulled apart by domestic and foreign enemies? Sometimes it seems it is impossible to endure this any longer."
Czarina Alexandra Feodorovna was, before her marriage to Nicholas II, known as Germany's Princess Alix von Hessen und bei Rhein. She undoubtedly loved Russia strongly, absolutely the same way the czar loved it. Her majesty had a very religious nature. She converted to Orthodox Christianity and was baptized in an Orthodox church before her marriage in 1894. And she accepted the religion not just formally, but with all her heart, mind and will.
The personal letters between Nicholas and Alexandra are filled with love and compassion for each other. Historians say that their honeymoon lasted all 23 years of their marriage.
The daughters of the royal couple -- the grand duchesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria and Anastasia -- were brought up without excess luxury. They were well educated, modest and religious. During World War I the grand duchesses worked as sisters of charity in the Russian hospitals. They had a keen sense of belonging to Russia and its people as their parents did. For instance, in 1916, plans were discussed that had Olga, the oldest daughter, becoming the wife of Romanian Prince Karol. But the girl firmly refused the idea with the words "I am Russian and want to remain Russian."
Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna "was known for her compassionate heart and desire to help others, but also for her temper, blunt honesty and moodiness." When reading a history lesson, Olga remarked that she was glad to live in current times, because people were good and not as evil as they had been in the past. Unfortunately and ironically, Olga was wrong. She fell an innocent victim of the cruel Bolshevik regime in her prime.
"The Bolshevik revolution happened not just by the will of discontent Russian commoners. Much more powerful and organized forces were behind the revolutionary hurricane. "
The second Romanov daughter was Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna. Tatiana was described as a tall and slender girl, with dark auburn hair and dark blue-gray
eyes. She was refined and elegant. Tatiana was considered by many courtiers the most beautiful of the four grand duchesses. Tatiana was practical and had a natural talent for leadership. Her sisters gave her the nickname "the Governess" and sent her as their group representative when they wanted their parents to grant a favor.
The third daughter was kind-hearted and good-tempered Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna. As a child she was so sweet that some compared her to Botticelli's angels. Maria was a good-natured, cheerful and friendly young lady .
The fourth daughter, Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna, was a tomboy, a brisk and merry girl. Living up to her nickname "Imp," young Anastasia grew into a vivacious and energetic child, described as short and inclined to be chubby, with blue eyes and strawberry-blond hair. Her sharp, witty remarks sometimes hit people's sensitive spots. Anastasia loved animals. She also had a talent for drawing.
The single son of the royal couple was Czarevitch Alexei. By order of Czar Paul (dating from the end of the 18th century), only a male could become an heir to the Russian throne.
But Alexei was sick with hemophilia. Because his blood didn't clot properly, any bump or bruise could kill him. It was one of the main personal (and state) worries for the family. Alexei had what Russians usually call "a golden heart." He easily felt an attachment to people, he liked them and tried to do his best to help them, especially when it seemed to him that someone was unjustly hurt.
Despite the restrictions on his activity, Alexei was active and mischievous by nature. He had simple tastes. He refused to speak anything but Russian and enjoyed wearing Russian costume.
Alexei was well aware that he might not live to adulthood. When he was 10, his older sister Olga found him lying on his back looking at the clouds and asked him what he was doing. "I like to think and wonder," Alexei replied. Olga asked him what he liked to think about. "Oh, so many things," the boy responded. "I want to enjoy the Sun and the beauty of summer as long as I can. Who knows whether one of these days I shall be prevented from doing it?"
The Romanov family was devoted to Russia until the end. They all lived and died according to the highest principles they believed in. The royal family stayed together through their last breaths of life during the massacre of July 16-17, 1918.
Nicholas II, Alexandra Feodorovna and their five innocent children were killed by the Bolsheviks secretly, without any prosecution or court decision. Why?
Official sources and history textbooks inform people about a leading role of the proletariat (the workers and peasants) in the 1917 Revolution. Politically correct "court historians" stated that it happened due to the disastrous state of the Russian economy and the utmost discontent with the czar's domestic and foreign policy.
But the truth was that by 1913, Russian peasants owned 72% of the land and owned their own farms for the most part.
The Russo-Japanese War and World War I essentially destabilized the country. The situation was favorable to the enemies of Russia. And in 1917 the disastrous revolution destroyed the old Russia. The Bolshevik revolution happened not by the will of discontented Russian commoners. Much more powerful and organized forces were behind the revolutionary hurricane.
Now that Soviet state archives are open and available for the public, one can see the new picture of the old events.



Czarist Russia had long been caught in the pinchers between Jewish Bolshevism and the forces of international capitalism personified by the elite families and financial groups surrounding the Rothschild Empire and its global tentacles. Shown here is an 1849 caricature reflecting the theme that a "loan monger" (that is, an international money lender in the sphere of the Rothschild banking dynasty) is "grinding swords for Austria and Russia." In other words, the loan monger expected to profit from war between the two empires. Following the Bolshevik Revolution, the considerable wealth of the Romanov dynasty itself-not to mention the Russian national treasury itself -- was looted by the Jewish Communists and billions of dollars were siphoned off into "Western" banks that were controlled by the Rothschild family and its satellite banking families. Although much is said about the alleged looting of Jewish assets by the Nazis before and during World War II, the facts about the looting of Russia-correctly described in the book History's Greatest Heist -- remain largely unknown. That book, by Sean McMeekin (hardback, 302 pages, indexed, #533, $38 minus 10% for TBR subscribers), is available from TBR Book Club, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Add $5 S&H inside U.S. Call 1-877 -773-9077 to charge to major credit cards.



PREPARING RUSSIA FOR REVOLUTION
Many thousands of Jewish-written volumes exist chronicling the hundreds of years of ethnic struggle between the Jewish people and the Russian people. Heartfelt Jewish historical accounts of "anti-Semitism" and suppression by the Russians are still written even today. On the opposite hand, hundreds of books have been written by Russians detailing Jewish financial thievery and exploitation of both the Russian economy and the peasantry.
Ironically, only a fraction of books detail the role of the ethnic conflict between the Russian nobility and organized Jewry that had a dynamic role in both the revolution and the ferocity of the suppression of the Russian people. The Bolshevik Revolution offered not a chance for Jewish emancipation, but for revenge against a traditional enemy.
It is well known that the revolution in Russia was prepared long before 1917. The 19th century was shaken by revolutionary ferment: the Decembrist revolt of 1825; the birth of political terrorism; Alexander II's murder. The French, German (Marxist) and Russian revolutionary doctrines worked as the theoretical basis for the revolutionary movements. Sensing the tendencies of the time, young radical Russian Jews actively participated in those movements. And by the end of the 19th century, the Jews played vanguard roles. By 1917 atheistic Jews took the leading role in the revolutionary movement in Russia.
The Jewish dominance in the 1905 and 1917 revolutions happened for good reason. On the one hand, the radical Jewish youth rebelled against the traditional Jewish community in Russia and split from it. They stood against the dogmatic religious Jewish values and total control from the elders over the rest of Jewish society. On the other hand, international Jewry recognized the young Russian Jews' energy as a force toward destroying the hated Russian empire.
International Jewish capitalists provided copious funding for the revolutionaries. American Jewish financier Jacob Schiff gave $20 million to the Bolshevik revolution. At the time he was one ofthe wealthiest men in the world, as head of the large banking house Kuhn & Loeb.
Jews dominated the leadership of international Bolshevism. By 1918, the chief governing body of the new Bolshevik state was the Council of Peoples Commissars. Records establish that Jews constituted at least 300 out of a total of 384 Bolshevik commissars that ruled Russia. Even more shockingly, only 13 revolutionaries among 384 commissars were actually ethnic Russians, which makes the term "Russian Revolution" an inaccurate description.
Jacob Schiff's investment return was very profitable for his bank. In 1921, the Bolsheviks deposited over 600 million rubles with Kuhn & Loeb.
Schiff, in loyalty to his Russian Jewish brethren, had earlier financed the enemies of Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia away from the money market of the United States, thus harming Russia's fiscal health. He even floated the large Japanese war loans of 1901-1905, thus making possible the Japanese victory over Russia.
Felix, Max and Paul Warburg, Otto H. Kahn, Mortimer L. Schiff, Jerome J. Hanauer, Simon Guggenheim, Max Breitung, Isaak Seligman, William Weissman, Olaf Ashberg and others were the other Jewish financiers of the socialist revolution in Russia. Jewish financial and media powerbrokers in Russia and around the world was learning to work in concert for what they saw as the interests of the Jewish people.
The utopian Marxist philosophy, the zealous enthusiasm of Jewish revolutionaries and international Jewish financial clout made the revolution in Russia possible.

CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM AND BOLSHEVISM
At the time of the murder of the czar and his family, those who composed the inner circle of the Bolshevik faction in revolutionary Russia consisted of Vladimir
Lenin (at least one-half Jewish), Leon Trotsky (a Jew whose real name was Lev Bronstein) Yakov Sverdlov (Jewish), [Lev] Kamenov (Jewish) and [Grigori] Zinoviev (Jewish). All serious studies of the Bolshevik revolution -- including those written by Jewish authors -- acknowledge (if occasionally with reluctance) the overwhelming Jewish role in the leadership of Bolshevism and of the revolutionary regime that was established. The people behind the specific organization and murder of the Romanovs were Philip Goloschokin, Petr Voikov and Yakov Yurovsky, all of whom were Jewish.
Robert Wilton, a Russian-based correspondent of The London Times and author of The Last Days of the Romanovs, wrote that, "the Bolshevik Revolution was nothing but one phase of the wider program that reflected an age-old religious struggle between Christianity and the Jewish forces of darkness."
The destruction of the Old Russia started with the killing of its czar and his innocent family and employees. Early socialist historians denied the Bolshevik leaders' complicity in the Romanovs' murder. But the telegrams between the Ural Council and the Bolshevik leaders in Moscow in July 1918 proved that the decision was actually made in Moscow. The content of the telegrams shows the consent of Lenin and Sverdlov upon the execution of Nicholas II. Lenin shared the idea of the revolutionary Sergey Netchayev (19th century) on the annihilation of the whole czarist family: "We will do what this great revolutionary has not accomplished!"
"Jewish financial & media power in Russia and around the world was learning to work in concert for what they saw as the interest of the Jewish people."
Originally the Bolsheviks planned a full-scale public process against the czar. And Trotsky was meant to be a chief accuser. But it never happened. In 1918 the Russian Civil War burst out. And Lenin and the others decided it was no time for such a formality as a public trial of the former czar. In addition, if a public pretense of trial was held for the czar, the Bolsheviks couldn't very well kill the czar's heirs along with him. The Jewish enemies of the czar had long vowed to wipe out the Romanov line.
Sverdlov was the direct organizer of the slaughter. He managed it from the Kremlin. Lenin called Sverdlov "the most professional revolutionary." Sverdlov was a very talented organizer. He succeeded in organizing the murder of the czar's family, the oppression of the Cossacks and the establishment of the "Red terror" against the revolution's enemies after the second murder attempt against Lenin in August 1918.
The names of direct executioners ofthe murder in Ekaterinburg are unclear due to the unreliability of the documents. For instance, the known document "Yurovsky's list" contains an alleged list of persons who shot the czar, his family and servants in the Ipatiev house. The document was dated July 18, 1918. A supposed group of murderers consists of Y. Yurovsky, G. Nikulin, P. Medvedev, S. Vaganov and seven "Letts": A. Vergasi, L. Kh(g)orvat, V. Greenfeld, E. Nad, A. Fekste, A. Fisher, E. Edelstein. However, some researchers believe the document was falsified and was leaked to the press of Germany in 1956 by a former Austrian captive I. Mayr. According to the Russian researcher Plotnikov, the list of executioners also could . include P. Yermakov, A. Kabanov, M. Medvedev, V. Netryebin and Ya. Tselms.
The direct murderer, a commandant of the Ipatiev house, was a Jew, Yankel Yurovsky. Those who planned to kill the Romanovs assumed that Russians would not shoot the czar and innocent members of his family, so the bulk of the murderers were purposely chosen to be Jews.
Those who executed the Romanovs did not feel the committed deed as a burden. Morality was substituted by the "revolutionary conscience" in those people.
The Bolshevik Ural Council (Ural soviet) made the official decision to execute the czar. It was made on July 6, 1918 after active "negotiations" with leaders in the Kremlin. Without any public investigation or hearing, the Ural Council stated in its decision: " ... In accordance with the people's will, the Executive Committee (of the Ural Council) decided to execute the former Czar Nikolai Romanov, who is guilty in countless bloody crimes."
One of the leading organizers in the Urals was Philip Goloschokin, a Jew. He was a personal friend of Sverdlov. It is known that in the beginning of July 1918 he was in Moscow, and that he visited the Kremlin, where he probably received instructions on the Romanovs' fate.
The most active member of the Ural Council was also a Jew, Pinkhus Voikov (Pinkhus Yeiner). He signed the decision on the slaughter of the czar. In addition to it, Voikov's name was stated on the two written demands to the drugstore with instructions to provide a proxy with a large amount of sulfuric acid. The chemical was later used for destroying the remains of the Romanovs.





Pictured above is a virtual "year book" of top Bolshevik mass murderers and propagandists -- all Jewish. First row (left to right): Lev Mekhlis, known as "Stalin's Hatchet Man"; Felix Dzerzhinsky (a Polish Communist) who founded the Bolshevik secret police (Cheka, later NKVD); and Karl Radek, who was active in the Polish and German Bolshevik movements before World War I and an international Communist leader after the Bolshevik revolution. Middle row (left to right): Genrikh Yagoda, the head of the NKVD, Soviet internal affairs and border guards from 1924 to 1936; Lavrenti Beria, chief of Soviet security and the NKvd; and Lazar Kaganovich, one of the men responsible for the Soviet famine of 1932--1933. Bottom row (left to right): Leon Trotsky, a Bolshevik revolutionary and theorist. He was one of the leaders of the Russian October Revolution, second only to Lenin; Yakov Sverdlov was the man who ordered the execution of the czar and his family; Bela Kun, a Hungarian Communist politician and Bolshevik agent who ruled Hungary as leader of the short-lived Hungarian Soviet Republic in 1919.



LAST MOMENTS OF THE ROMANOVS
The circumstances of the Romanovs' murder in the Ipatiev house that night are unclear and, perhaps, will always remain so. The last moments of the Romanovs' lives were described in many articles and books, even memoirs of the direct executioners exist. None of them can claim to be absolute truth. Historical documents to some extent will always reflect the viewpoint of their creators. Many public, personal and international interests were intertwined in this bloodshed. Nevertheless, many researchers nowadays rely on the book by Russian investigator Nikolai Sokolov. The book is based on the substantial factual material that he gathered in 1919-1924.
Sokolov's investigation stated that a murder happened in the Ipatiev house one day between July 17 and 22, 1918. The cellar room contained marks of bullet shots, bayonets, human blood on the floor and walls, and bullets stuck in the paneling of the room: "The killing was performed by means of revolvers and bayonets. [ ... ] More than 30 shots were made; it was impossible to concede that all the hits were through and were not remaining in the victims' bodies."
Sokolov's book does not contain the murder details. But the horrendous picture of the bloodshed against these 11 defenseless prisoners of the Bolsheviks is described in memoirs of direct participants of the slaughter. For instance, Strekotin recalled: "They [the Romanovs and their servants] did not die for a long time; they were crying, moaning, convulsing. That lady -- the madam -- was dying with especial difficulty. Yermakov stabbed her whole chest through and through. He hit her with a bayonet so hard that every time the bayonet drove deeply into the floor.
"Generally speaking, it [the slaughter-author's note] was very disorganized. For instance, young Alexei 'swallowed' 11 bullets before he finally died. It turned out he was a very tenacious lad."
Netryebin's memories: "The youngest daughter of the former czar fell on her back and feigned death. She was noticed by comrade Yermakov and killed with a shot in her chest. He stepped on both of her hands and made a shot into her chest. He did not forget to shoot down a little dog of Anastasia, Jemmy."

SIGNS OF AN OCCULT, RITUAL MURDER
Jewish involvement in the Romanovs' murder was so prominent that some researchers even raised the question of whether or not it had a ritual nature. This question was asked also because strange coded signs and numbers were found in the cellar room of the Ipatiev house.
The Russian Prosecutor General's Office announced that "the investigation totally rules out the ritual nature of the murder .... The investigation did not find evidence that the note on the window had a kabalistic nature."
The investigator N. Sokolov wrote that he had found a peculiar inscription written in the German language on the southern wall of Room No. II: "Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht/Von seinen Knechten umgebracht."
The quotation, taken from the poem Belsazar by Heinrich Heine, a poet of Jewish extraction born in Germany, means in English "Belsazar was, on the same night, killed by his servants." Belshazzar (as it is spelled in the West) was the gentile king of Babylon who, in the Old Testament story, saw "the writing on the wall" foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5). He was killed as punishment for his offenses against Israel's God. In a clever play on the Heine quotation, the unknown writer, certainly one of the killers, has substituted "Belsatzar" for Heine's spelling "Belsazar," in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial/ethnic character of the murders: A gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution.
Additionally there were occult signs and numbers scrawled on the wall of the basement of the Ipatiev house where the murders took place. A specialist on the Kabala, M. Skaryatin, an Orthodox Christian historian, L. Bolotin and a specialist on the history of Masonry, 1. Plotnikov, have argued that those signs are clearly Kabalistic and not just happenstance numbers and symbols written for no reason.
Skaryatin decrypted those coded signs in 1925: "The head of religion, people and the state (Russian) was killed here; the order is executed." Although some Jewish writers criticized the conclusions of Skaryatin, none of them offered any refutation by Kabalistic standards.
The meaning of the series of numbers still was not decrypted. One clue might be that it is obvious the digit "8" was used in those series an unusual number of times. The number "8," or "888," is connected with the name of Jesus Christ in the Jewish Kabala. The czar as a sacrifice is compared in his purity to Christ.
Performance of a ritual cult in Jewish occult sciences demands also the presence of a Jewish minister of religion (a priest) and the cremation of the body of the sacrificed after a ritual murder is committed. The mysterious arrival of "a Jew with a jet-black beard" with Red Army men from Moscow to the Ipatiev House in the middle of July 1918, might be evidence in favor of a presence of such a minister while the slaughter of the prisoners took place. The burning of the bodies after the murder can affirm the assumption of a ritual nature of the Romanovs' elimination.
"The physical destruction of the Romanovs symbolized the definitive decline of the old Christian state. God, czar and the Russian people were a sPiritual triune unity of the Russian state."
Why would the atheistic Jewish Bolsheviks carry out a ritual murder of the czar, his family, their dog and their servants? There are many points of view, pro and con, regarding the possible ritual nature of the Romanovs' slaughter.
Even if the speculation is true, "those for whom it is absolutely no advantage to reveal the secret, will undertake any possible measures that are in their power for invalidation and mockery" of the decryption results provided by Skaryatin.

KILLING OF CZAR A DISASTER FOR RUSSIA

The Romanovs' murder has a deep and tragic meaning for the Russian people. Historian Ivor Benson characterized the killing of the Romanov family as a symbol of the tragic fate of Russia. The physical destruction of the Romanovs symbolized the definitive decline of the old Christian state. God, czar and the Russian people were the triumverate of the Russian state. They were three interdependent pillars of Russia's existence. Destruction of one of those pillars led to the decay of the rest and, as a result to the Russian state's decay. Even before Nicholas II became the Russian monarch, the country suffered some spiritual decadence. The czar was killed in 1918, and it was then the Bolshevik henchmen began the extensive extermination of the Russian people.
The czar's murder was necessary for Bolsheviks. The desecration of the last Romanov dynasty members showed that no moral boundaries were left. After the murder every bloody blasphemous deed was possible for revolutionaries and, moreover, they were justified by "revolutionary necessity." All the doors were open for the plunder of the vast material values of Russia, profanation of its spiritual values and excessive extermination of Russian people. [Refer to History's Greatest Heist. See sidebar page 57 for more about book.-TBR Ed.]
A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre at the Ipatiev house, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared: "Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritsky [Moisei Solomonovich Uritsky was a Bolshevik revolutionary leader in Russia.-Ed.] let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie -- more blood, as much as possible."
"The sinister anti-Russian power succeeded in destruction of the natural leadership, the aristocracy and the intelligentsia of the Russian people. The old Russia ceased to exist."

The "enemy" was anybody who had even the smallest disagreement with Bolsheviks. More importantly, if you were part of the aristocracy you were automatically an enemy. If you were a non-Jewish small businessman or successful peasant you were an enemy. Anybody could be announced "an enemy of the people" if he decided to hide a scant supply of food to feed his family instead of giving it all to the Bolsheviks. The Bolshevik victims are enumerated in the millions. The sinister anti-Russian power succeeded in the destruction of the natural leadership, the aristocracy and the intelligentsia of the Russian people. The old Russia ceased to exist.
Concealment of the identity and motivation of the Romanovs murder protected the forces who committed it. Today modem authorities use the murder's ambiguity to their political advantages as well.

LOOKING FOR CLOSURE
Nine remains of the Romanov family were officially found in 1991. National and foreign genetic experts established the identity of the remains. And alleged Romanov remains were buried in the Petropavlovsk fortress (St. Petersburg) in 1998. Many people, including leaders of the Russian Orthodox Church, question the verity of the DNA examination results. For this reason, heads of the Russian Orthodox Church did not participate in the burial procession in 1998.
In 1981 the members of the Romanov family killed in Ekaterinburg were canonized as saints and regal passion bearers by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia. The Russian Orthodox Church [in Russia] consecrated the Romanovs as saints in 2000. However, the authenticity of the Romanovs' remains is very important for spiritual reasons. In Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic tradition, the saintly bodies are bearers of God-sent powers. Believers can receive blessings through the remains of saints.
Inevitably, the burial was presented as a final solution to the 1918 tragedy. It was supposed to establish historical clarity upon the death of Romanovs.
By the way, it is ironic that the men responsible for remains identification and the burial processes were appointed Russian politician Boris Nemtsov and his assistant Victor Aksyutchits, who are both Jewish. The chronicler of the Romanovs' remains was the popular writer of Russian history, Edward Radzinsky.
In July 2007 it was formally announced that the alleged remains of Czarevitch Alexei and Grand Duchess Maria were found and identified near Ekaterinburg.
Early December 2009 the city of Moscow announced the termination of the investigation on the Romanov family murder. The decree of the Russian Federation Supreme Court found that the czar's family was executed as victims of political regime and it was not a criminal offense. Thus, the Romanovs fell victims of cruel revolutionary times.
The murderers' names (and nationalities) are well known. Russian streets, squares, subway stations and even whole regions still carry the names of those
who killed the Romanovs in 19l8 -- for instance, Leninsky Prospect in Moscow. Russia's state federal territories include "Sverdlovskaya oblast'" (Sverdlov region). Moscow has a subway stations named "Voikovskaya" (in Voikov's memory). Despite the multiple public protests and claims against it, the modem Moscow government still left the name of the subway station unchanged.
That heinous crime against the Romanovs and their servants hit Russia and its people in the very heart.

MARINA MARYNOVA is a Russian civil rights lawyer who served in the Human Rights Division during the Putin administration. She has extensive experience in the field, including a period at the European Court on Human Rights in Strasbourg, France. She is currently working on a comprehensive study of the paramount Jewish role in the extensive Bolshevik crimes against the Russian and other European peoples.











1994
RUSSOPHOBIA

A distinguished Russian historian and mathematician, expelled from the American Academy of Science for his “objectionable,” anti-Establishment views regarding his mother country, sets forth his view of the Russian character and the distortions of Russian history promulgated by Establishment historians.


Over the centuries misconception of Russia has been fueled by certain special interests who hate Russia, its civilization, its culture, and its spiritual life.
Russia, according to these interests, is a land of slaves who admire cruelty and raw power, who hate culture and foreigners. The very character of Russians makes Russia an eternal hotbed of despotism and totalitarianism.
This phobia of all things Russian can be traced to members of so-called “illuminated” philosophical societies; secret Masonic lodges and financiers who undermined France and brought about the Reign of Terror in the 1790s. These occult groups were very organized then and have since developed a modus operandi for the subversion and destruction of historical nations. These same people and their successors repeated what they had wrought in France during the 1790s in the Russia of 1900. The only difference is that in France they had managed to develop locally and enlist the help of local thugs for their planned terror; in Russia they had to import the whole terror mechanism and ideology from the West. Their totalitarian ideas and methods had no precedent in Russia and therefore caught the Russian people totally unprepared to cope with their ruthless and fanatical violence. The non-materialism and almost mystical religious-cultural wholeness of the Russian people is the antithesis of what the “petty totalitarians” stand for. “Russian socialism” never existed it was completely imported from the West and was totally alien to Russia and Russians.

http://www.rue-des-livres.com/images/auteurs/auteur_1504.jpg
Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s perceptions
of Russia have drawn establishment ire.

Russian culture and literature had never produced anything remotely associated with utopian schemes such as Thomas Campanella’s City in the Sun (the dream of an absolute communism) or Thomas More’s Utopia. The harsh geographical realities of Russia combined with the almost mystical religious-cultural bonding of Russians with their Mother Russia made all such utopianism totally alien.
The obsession with materialism found with utopianism is also alien to the Russian people, who are basically non-materialistic and have diametrically opposed interests and pursuits. The concept of the Russian soul, so often derided and misunderstood by the Western media, is in fact very real and a great uniting bond among all Russian people.
Socialism was imported from the West and imposed by force and violence at the cost of millions of lives, as it was so alien and incomprehensible to the Russian people.
French author Augustin Cochin called these occult and subversive groups the “mean petty people” for their relentless lust to destroy, pervert and subvert the fruit built by centuries of civilization. It was perhaps a euphemism when one considers the ravages brought about by successive generations of these fanatics. In fact it is a well organized war of conquest waged by an alien minority against all historical nations.
Russian resistance to bow to absolutist alien ideologies has enraged all the proponents of socialism and liberal democracy. If not gratefully accepted by the natives, it must be imposed by force regardless of the cost in human lives and national destruction. Thus Prof. R. Pipes, a leading specialist in Russian history and former Reagan advisor, went so far as to state that private property did not exist in Muscovite Russia and that schools appeared in Russia only after Peter I had started to westernize the country, where most officials were illiterate.
Such erroneous views of a “dark and obscurantist Russia” held by others at the turn of the century made it easy to justify the imposition of “liberating socialism” on Russia.
In reality, all throughout the 15th to the 17th centuries government officials were very much literate, as were members of the clergy. Seventy-five percent of the monks were literate, 50 percent of the landholders, 20 percent of the urban population and 15 percent of the peasants. Schools existed throughout Russia. In the context of the era it was actually proportionate or higher than other Western countries.
Such facts are inconvenient to the proponents who never stop trying to impose their singularly narrow values on Russia. The academic, mass-media and show-business controllers of the West have always been in sympathy with the Bolshevik and Marxist enforcers who took over Russia. To them Socialism and Communism were their children, the brave foot soldiers who would advance “international liberal democracy.” To them in true absolutist fashion there is no choice or nuance.
The people of the world have only one choice: to accept “modern democracy” as defined by the media-academic-liberal establishment. If they choose anything else they are immediately demonized and subject to the most violent punishment and enforcement. Recalcitrance to the liberal utopian totalitarian tyranny can never be punished enough. They must forever be prohibited from finding their own way of life and development and retain the culture and history that bound them together. The forces that unleashed communism in Russia from the West at the turn of the century are very much in power today and the efforts to subjugate Russia have never been stronger.
My book Russophobia deals with this subject. It is my humble hope that Western people and particularly Americans will benefit from it. Russia and the Russian people are a friendly universe which should however not be conquered by alien systems and ideologies aiming to destroy its history, culture and very nationhood.


















Il y a 770 ans, jour pour jour, après 10 mois de siège, tombait la forteresse de Montségur, et mouraient le même jour sur le bûcher 220 chrétiens cathares, hommes et femmes, après refus de renier leur foi (1).

Un énorme entassement de paille, de fagots, de résine et de poix avait été enclos d'une palissade au pied de la citadelle en guise d'holocauste au Moloch romain. Tous étaient là, en ce petit matin de printemps : Pierre Amiel, évêque de Narbonne et son compère Durant, celui d'Albi, en fidèles représentants de l'Eglise de Rome, et le pieux inquisiteur Ferrier suivi de ses assesseurs zélés. Devant eux les condamnés, pieds nus, mains liées.

Après qu'une hypocrite admonestation leur eut été adressée au nom de « l'inépuisable miséricorde de l'Eglise envers les repentants » (il n'y en eut, de fait, aucun), tous furent hissés et précipités dans l'enclos de mort. Quelques brandons suffirent à bouter la flamme en ce qui devint instantanément une monstrueuse fournaise ardente où ces deux centaines d'hommes et de femmes se transformèrent aussitôt en torches vivantes en face de la grande estrade des évêques et des inquisiteurs. Il est dit qu'un puissant Veni Creator s'éleva de suite, à toute fin de couvrir les cris de souffrance des suppliciés, et puis le ronflement du brasier emporta leurs voix. C'était le matin du mercredi 16 mars 1244 (2).

L'interdiction de l'esprit

Le dernier espoir de restaurer la Connaissance et la foi chrétienne dans sa pureté originelle venait d'être anéanti. Le flambeau devait maintenant s'occulter pour de longs siècles dans la clandestinité, la dernière opportunité de contrecarrer la future explosion du matérialisme en germe dans la double influence délétère du judaïsme ahrimanique, et du luciférisme latent dans l'islam venait de disparaître dans les flammes. Désormais l'ultime possibilité de compenser les influences antagonistes de Lucifer et d'Ahrimane dans l'évolution des peuples se trouvait reléguée sous la braise dans certaines confraternités initiatiques occultes objets de toutes les malédictions des pouvoirs ecclésiastiques en place, tant à l'ouest qu'à l'est.

Ce n'est pas le lieu ici de rappeler avec quelle férocité et quelles complicités l'Eglise en était arrivée à ce degré de trahison de l'esprit même du christianisme sur tout l'ensemble des pays relevant de sa juridiction – car il s'agissait bien là de l'installation, par la terreur, d'une chape de plomb spirituelle appelée à museler pour de longs siècles toute liberté religieuse et toute tentative d'accéder librement à la connaissance des mondes spirituels en dehors des voies balisées par l'Eglise en vue de sa domination sans partage sur les âmes. C'est à cette mise au pas de toute forme d'initiation chrétienne indépendante de Rome qu'avait été institué cet outils répressif effroyable que fut l'Inquisition : verrouiller par tous les moyens les voies d'accès aux mondes spirituels, et partant à la compréhension de ce que fut réellement le Mystère du Christ. En d'autres termes, pour parler clairement, une contre-Eglise ou, comme la désignaient les Cathares, une "Eglise de Satan" enfermant les hommes dans la seule connaissance des choses de la Terre, à l'exclusion totale de toute relation spirituelle directe avec ce qu'il est convenu d'appeler le Macrocosme et les sphères planétaires des différentes Hiérarchies divines enveloppant le mystère et la mission du Christ incarné : en définitive toute possibilité d'accès direct à la Sagesse divine par la voie de l'Initiation. Il paraîtrait qu'il faudrait éviter de dire ces choses, mais il faut pourtant bien ici appeler un chat : un chat – noir.

L'affaire avait été mûrement préparée : c'est au 8ème concile œcuménique de Constantinople en 869 qu'avait été mis en place – nous l'avons déjà signalé – ce qui ne peut s'appeler autrement que l'élimination de l'esprit dans l'homme, réduisant celui-ci d'un trait de plume à une dualité corps-âme, alors que toute la sagesse des initiés chrétiens (et païens) reposait jusqu'alors sur une trinité corps-âme-esprit à l'image de la Trinité divine du Père, du Fils et du Saint-Esprit. Supprimer la connaissance de la nature spirituelle de l'homme interdisait, en effet, de facto, tout enseignement de la réincarnation et revenait à interdire toute possibilité d'accéder à la connaissance de la réalité spirituelle suprasensible de la Nature et de ses entités. Seuls les bons Pères se réservaient désormais le droit de dire le vrai et le faux. A eux seuls la connaissance et la vision, aux profanes l'obéissance aveugle et la vénération, au besoin par la force, et l'on sait qu'ils ne s'en privèrent pas. Mais une menace se profilait : le danger de laisser le christianisme, et partant la chrétienté (ou ce qu'elle était devenue) sans poids moral devant ce qui montait du sud et de l'est avec les ferments délétères de l'Islam.
« Dans les siècles précédents, un courant venant de l'Est et du Sud avait déferlé sur l'Europe, apportant un intellectualisme extrême, un entendement cérébral effréné : l'arabisme. On pouvait déceler dans l'arabisme, qui anticipait des phénomènes à venir, dans quelle direction l'évolution intellectuelle du citadin et la culture profane allaient entraîner l'humanité. Une perspective s'ouvrait sur une ère de glaciation de l'âme. » (3)
La nature spirituelle de l'homme une fois éliminée par décret – ex cathedra pourrait-on dire – il ne restait plus, en effet, que l'âme et la vie intérieure. De là, la soudaine instauration de ce culte marial destiné à compenser – ou plutôt à détourner – la connaissance de l'Esprit vers celle de l'Âme à travers le culte de la Vierge. Cette Vierge Sophia que la sagesse, tant païenne que chrétienne, rattachait jusqu'alors à la connaissance de l'Esprit cosmique, se restreignait dès lors, du fait de l'interdiction ecclésiastique, à n'être plus que l'humaine Vierge Marie, dans le temps même où le Christ tendait à devenir de plus en plus le bon Jésus des Jésuites, en quelque sorte un prophète parmi d'autres à l'image de celui du Coran... Que restait-il maintenant de l'enseignement grandiose du Christ solaire, de Son Incarnation et du mystère de la Rédemption du genre humain ? Des mots vides pour l'essentiel, et l'on sait ce qu'il en advint : les schismes, les guerres de religion, le développement accéléré du matérialisme et la glaciation de l'âme. Consécutivement pour finir : l'effondrement de la foi chrétienne, l'ahrimanisme inhumain du bolchévisme, le désastreux Israël sioniste et l'assaut tous azimuts de l'obscurantisme islamique, le premier pape jésuite enfin sur le trône vatican... Manque plus maintenant que l'Antéchrist et cette incarnation prochaine d'Ahrimane évoquée par Steiner :

L'irruption des esprits des ténèbres

« Ahrimane (4) apparaîtra sous forme humaine dans la civilisation de l'Ouest – il est vrai qu'à ce moment, elle ne pourra plus guère être appelée une civilisation. Ce que Lucifer fit autrefois en Chine et ce que l'entité du Christ fit plus tard au Proche-Orient, Ahrimane le fera, à sa manière dans l'Ouest. Il ne sert à rien de s'illusionner sur ces choses. Ahrimane apparaîtra sous une forme humaine. Tout dépendra alors de la préparation qu'il aura fait subir aux hommes. Subjuguera-t-il toute l'humanité civilisée, ou bien les hommes seront-ils en état de lui résister ? De nos jours, les hommes se détournent de ces vérités, ils les fuient, et l'on ne peut guère les leur révéler tout à fait sans fard, car on serait raillé, ridiculisé, honni !... Cette propension à détourner les yeux des vérités les plus importantes sera pour Ahrimane la meilleure des armes, un excellent atout qui risque d'assurer la réussite de son incarnation […] L'incarnation d'Ahrimane ne pourra être évitée. Elle se fera, car il faut que les hommes se trouvent finalement en face de cette entité adverse, et que, si je peux m'exprimer ainsi, ils la regardent dans les yeux. Cette entité incarnée montrera aux hommes à quelle acuité inouïe d'intelligence ils peuvent parvenir lorsqu'ils s'aident de toutes les forces terrestres. Au milieu des maux et des bouleversements qui affligeront les hommes dans un proche avenir, on découvrira toutes sortes de forces et de substances grâce auxquelles l'humanité se procurera sa nourriture. Mais on reconnaîtra que toutes ces découvertes matérielles sont dues aux organes de l'entendement et non pas à l'Esprit. » (R. Steiner, Lucifer & Ahrimane, Genève, 1977, p. 17 et 47)
Les choses sont donc en place et se précisent. Une fois l'esprit banni, les ténèbres s'emparent du vide des âmes. C'est "à l'Ouest" que se réalisera l'incarnation satanique, en pendant symétrique à celle de Lucifer jadis en Chine (5), et Rudolf Steiner a mainte fois souligné le rôle du pôle ahrimanique de la Terre en rapport avec l'Amérique du Nord, le pôle magnétique et les Montagnes Rocheuses :
« C’est la région où, sous l’effet des conditions extérieures, se développe avant tout une parenté avec la nature méphistophélique ahrimanienne. Et beaucoup, dans l’évolution de la terre qui poursuit sa marche en avant, est dû à cette parenté. L’homme n’est pas en droit, aujourd’hui, de passer par l’évolution de la terre en aveugle ; il doit percer à jour ces liens entre les choses. L’Europe ne pourra établir des rapports justes avec l’Amérique que si ces circonstances peuvent être percées à jour, que si l’on sait quelles limitations d’ordre géographique viennent de là-bas. Sinon, si l’Europe continue à rester aveugle à ce propos, il en ira de cette pauvre Europe comme il en alla de la Grèce par rapport à Rome. Il ne faut pas qu'il en soit ainsi ! Il ne faut pas que le monde soit géographiquement américanisé – car les efforts de l'Amérique visent à tout mécaniser, à tout faire entrer dans le domaine du pur naturalisme, à effacer peu à peu de la surface de la Terre la culture de l'Europe. » (R. Steiner, Derrière le voile des événements, G.A. 178, Paris, 1999, pp. 88-89)
Une activité ahrimanique intense s'étend, en effet, depuis ce continent sur toute la Terre, émanant du sol et suscitant chez les Américains cette irrépressible volonté de puissance dont on retrouve immédiatement le caractère dans l'impérialisme effréné des Etats-Unis depuis leur fondation. Il faudrait être bien irréfléchi pour ne pas le constater. Il serait vain et naïf d'attendre autre chose des USA et de leurs vassaux qu'une obstination frénétique dans leurs objectifs de domination mondiale quels qu'en soient les moyens, criminels ou non : Ahrimane y étant à demeure, si l'on peut dire. Tous les développements géopolitiques des deux derniers siècles, y compris les deux dernières guerres mondiales et ce qui se passe aujourd'hui en Ukraine ou au Moyen-Orient, voire au Vénézuela, ont leur origine en cette emprise ahrimanienne du bloc BAO (6) et de l'OTAN. C'est à l'arrière-plan qu'agissent les puissances adverses, mais très directement dans l'esprit de ceux qu'on nomme à tort les "décideurs" – qui ne font jamais qu'appliquer aveuglément la volonté masquée de ce qui les inspire et dont ils ne savent rien.

Ce ne sont là que quelques aperçus de ce qui découlait très directement de l'écrasement du Christianisme ésotérique médiéval par les forces noires à l'aube des temps modernes. Peu après (vers 1250) survenait cette mystérieuse et brève occultation de toute vision spirituelle dont parle à plusieurs reprises Steiner, et la plongée dans la pensée desséchée des réformes et contre-réforme des Guerres de religions, toutes dans l'horreur et le sang, comme une contre-image satanique du Christianisme réel.

Partout désormais, ne trouvant plus qu'un vide spirituel abyssal en Europe, surgissent et se répandent ces hommes sans âme que nous évoquions dans le précédent article : vrais syndicats du crime et pseudo militaires otaniens à l'Ouest (Blackwater) ; faux guerriers, mais vrais égorgeurs islamistes aux Proche et Moyen-Orient, mais aussi partout où les ferments décadents de l'Islam wahhabo-takfir ont pris racine, hypocritement armés et soutenus, sous fausse bannière, par cet Occident fourbe et retors auquel se sont vendus depuis si longtemps la plupart de nos politiciens. Ce n'est pas dans l'abstraction des nuages qu'agissent, en effet, les puissances ahrimaniennes et Sorath, mais bien directement dans les cerveaux si malencontreusement vidés de toute vie spirituelle réelle. Car c'est bien la suppression de l'Esprit en l'homme par l'Eglise en 869 qui devait ouvrir dès le XIIIè siècle un boulevard aux légions sataniques, pour aboutir plus tard, à partir de 1840, à cette invasion planétaire des esprits des ténèbres dont parle Steiner dans ce cycle magistral de 1917, à l'heure même où l'Europe se massacrait follement dans la boue des tranchées (7). Et ce n'était qu'un début.


On pourrait s'étonner que de telles conséquences puissent avoir leur origine dans cet anéantissement total, par le fer et par le feu, du Catharisme au XIIIè siècle, autrement dit de ce Christianisme johannique originel directement issu de l'Initiation. Mais c'est pourtant bien là le karma le plus direct de toute non-violence spirituelle face à la force brute. Et ce sera bel et bien au Karma de régler ce conflit.
(WH.)




1. Le nombre oscille selon les sources entre 205 et 225. Sur ce nombre, 64 sont nommément identifiés, dont la jeune Esclarmonde de Pereille.  
2. Date officielle à nuancer. En tenant compte des différences de comput entre calendrier julien (en usage au XIIIè s.) et le calendrier grégorien, la date solaire véritable serait, en réalité plus proche du 23 mars et de l'équinoxe que du 16 (soleil à 2°50' dans le Bélier en 1244). Nous avons seulement retenu la date pour des raisons de conformité historique.  
3. Emil Bock, Le triple mystère de Marie, Edit. Iona, Franchesse, 2002, p. 40.  
4. Satan.  
5. Vers la fin du 4ème millénaire avant JC selon Steiner, soit peu avant la fondation de la 1ère dynastie égyptienne. Cf. R.S., Lucifer & Ahrimane (GA n°193).  
6. Bloc Américano-Occidentaliste dont l'OTAN est le bras armé. En face l'OTSC russe et l'Organisation de Shanghaï. 
7. R. Steiner, La Chute des esprits des ténèbres, (GA 177), Paris.



Publié il y a par