Yitzhak Shamir, le terroriste devenu président d'Israël qui joua un rôle central dans la conspiration contre JFK

Dans Final Judgment: The Missing Links in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy (1994) l'auteur Michael Collins Piper accuse Yitzhak "Shamir" (Yitzhak Yezernitzky, qui a non seulement été terroriste mais premier ministre d'Israël!) d'avoir trempé dans le complot pour assassiner JFK, alors qu'il était en fonctions à la tête de l'escouade d'assassins du Mossad. Il aurait assuré l'embauche de tireurs d'élite étrangers (grâce à un ami dans les services secrets français), pour mener ainsi à bien l'opération de camouflage de l'identité véritable des conspirateurs, qui auraient été nuls autres que: le Premier ministre israélien d'alors David "Ben-Gurion" (David Gryn), le chef de l'escouade d'assassins du Mossad Yitzhak "Shamir" (Yitzhak Yezernitsky) ainsi que leurs alliés à l'intérieur de la CIA et de la pègre chapeautée par Meyer "Lansky" (Meyer Suchowljansky).

THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

(...)
"Yitzhak Shamir - A long-time Mossad officer (based largely at the Mossad's chief European office in Paris), Shamir headed the Mossad's assassination squad at the time of the JFK assassination. A former French intelligence officer has charged that Shamir himself arranged the hiring of JFK's actual assassins through a close ally in French intelligence. (See Chapter 5 and Chapter 16)

Yitzhak Shamir - Un agent de longue date du Mossad (basé en grande partie au bureau chef européen du Mossad, à Paris), Shamir dirigeait l'unité d'assassinat du Mossad au moment de l'assassinat de JFK. Un ancien officier de renseignement français a accusé Shamir lui-même d'avoir organisé l'embauche des assassins de JFK grâce à un proche allié au sein des renseignements français.

(...)
Georges deLannurien - High ranking official in the SDECE, the French intelligence agency; pinpointed by a former French intelligence officer as the individual who (at the behest of Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir) contracted the hit team who killed JFK in Dallas. (See Chapter 16)

Georges DeLannurien - Haut-fonctionnaire du SDECE, les services secrets français; révélé par un ancien officier de renseignement français comme étant l'individu qui (au service du chef de l'unité d'assassins du Mossad Yitzhak Shamir) a engagé les tireurs qui ont tué JFK à Dallas.

(...)

A MOSSAD HIT SQUAD

We know precisely who would have coordinated Mossad participation in the assassination on John F. Kennedy, working in concert with Israel's allies in the CIA and in Organized Crime (about more of which we shall discuss in these pages.)

Israel's respected Ha'aretz newspaper reported on July 3, 1992 that it was former Jewish underground terrorist-turned-Mossad operative Yitzhak Shamir (later Israeli Prime Minister) who headed a special Mossad hit squad during his service in the Mossad.

The Israeli newspaper reported that Shamir headed the assassination unit from 1955 until 1964—the year after JFK' s assassination. "The unit carried out attacks on perceived enemies and suspected Nazi War criminals,"(147) according to an account of the newspaper's report.

"In February 1963 Mr. Shamir dispatched squads on two unsuccessful attempts to assassinate Hans Kleinwachter, a German scientist suspected of helping Egypt develop missiles. Another German scientist working for the Egyptians, Heinz Krug, disappeared mysteriously in September 1962."(148) Shamir's operatives were suspected of having been responsible.

According to the Israeli newspaper, Shamir had recruited members for his Mossad hit squad from former members of the Stern Gang, the underground terrorist group that Shamir led during Israel's fight for independence. The Stern Gang was responsible for the murder, in 1944, of Lord Moyne, Britain's resident Mideast minister, and for the slaying of U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte in 1948. (149)

THE FRENCH CONNECTION . . .

In a private communication to this author after he read the first draft of Final Judgment—sent to him by no less than former U.S. Congressman Paul Findley (R-Ill.)—former French intelligence officer Pierre Neuville stated (based on his own inside knowledge) that a French team—professional assassins—were among the actual shooters in Dealey Plaza, committing the crime at the behest of the Israeli Mossad. (In the Postscript to this volume we review the remarkable story of this Frenchman and his own astounding experiences with the Mossad.)

In Neuville's judgment: "Never the Prime Minister of Israel would have involved Mossad people, American Jews or CIA personnel in the execution part of the conspiracy. Even the CIA contract the services of other members of the intelligence community (they like the French style) to wash dirty linens. The right hand does not know what the left did. The cover-up team doesn't know who execute. And the executioners are not interested in the aftermath of their mission. They don't care less."(652)

According to Neuville's sources, then-Mossad assassination chief Yitzhak Shamir (later prime minister of Israel) arranged the hiring of at least one of the assassins through the deputy chief of the French intelligence service (the SDECE), Colonel Georges deLannurien.

"It was no coincidence," Neuville wrote, "that on the very day of the execution of the president by the French team that [deLannurien] was at Langley meeting with James Jesus Angleton, the Mossad mole."

According to Neuville, "There are no coincidences in the suspicion business—just cover-ups. The case of communist infiltration of the French secret service was an appropriate cover-up to justify the presence of Colonel deLannurien at Langley, Virginia." (653)

It seems obvious that Angleton and deLannurien were together for a very specific purpose: damage control—making sure that the assassination cover-up fell into place after the crime itself had been committed.

Angleton himself told the House Assassinations Committee that de Lannurien had come to his office for just that purpose: seeking assistance in routing out communist moles in the SDECE. (654)

This controversy—alleged KGB infiltration into French intelligence—was a direct result of Angleton's machinations. It was Angleton (often prodded by his Mossad allies) who had a history of fingering alleged Soviet infiltrators in other nations' intelligence services, creating mass disarray, confusion, bitterness and resentment in their ranks.

Following World War II Angleton served as American intelligence liaison with the SDECE and maintained close friendships with a number of French intelligence officials throughout his career. And undoubtedly these were Frenchmen who shared Angleton's devotion to Israel.
(...)

A SMALL CIRCLE OF CONSPIRATORS

The close connections between a relatively small circle of people and those in their immediate spheres of influence is no coincidence. That all of them, in some fashion, were part of the circumstances surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy is also no coincidence.

Critics of JFK assassination conspiracy theories contend that a conspiracy so immense would require a vast number of people involved. In fact, the mechanics of initiating the conspiracy described in Final Judgment involved perhaps no more than 20 people. Most of those ultimately involved in the conspiracy were probably not even aware of the activities of the others who were involved. So then, let us name, for the record, those whom we believe had advance knowledge that John F. Kennedy was going to be killed on November 22, 1963. They are:

• Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion;

• Israeli Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir;

• Permindex chief executive officer Louis M. Bloomfield;

• Mossad officer and Permindex banker Rabbi Tibor Rosenbaum;


• CIA Counterintelligence chief James J. Angleton;


• French intelligence officer Georges deLannurien;


• Crime Syndicate boss Meyer Lansky;


• The actual shooters in Dealey Plaza. Evidence strongly points toward French mercenary Michael Mertz as one of those gunmen. In any case, as we have seen, at least one assassin was contracted by the Mossad through disloyal elements in French intelligence, although it is probable that there were several assassination teams in place.


• CIA contract agent and longtime Mossad asset Frank Sturgis claimed to have played a part in the events in Dealey Plaza. His Cuban exile henchmen, Guillermo and Ignacio Novo, who were with Sturgis in Dallas also played some role, although whether they were actual gunmen has yet to be determined.

Although it is likely (although not certain) that Meyer Lansky's Mafia lieutenants—Santo Trafficante, Jr. of Tampa and Carlos Marcello of New Orleans—had advance knowledge of the impending assassination itself, it is not clear that they, or, for that matter, Chicago Mafia boss Sam Giancana or the Mafia's "roving ambassador," Johnny Rosselli, were actually involved in the planning of the assassination itself. However, we do know today that both Giancana and Rosselli were under the thumb of Mossad-connected crime boss Hyman Lamer—and that opens up a whole new can of worms.

The role of the Italian-American organized crime figures in the JFK assassination is more media-generated myth than reality. At best, they were secondary players in the bigger scheme of things.

In Appendix Nine we will also consider the likely role—at least as an intermediary—that top-ranking Mossad figure Shaul Eisenberg played in the events surrounding the assassination, suggesting that Eisenberg did, in fact, have advance knowledge of the impending assassination.

(...)As far as the Mossad is concerned, Mossad operatives could not have acted without the direct orders of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir. The Mossad is actually a very small organization institutionally, as former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky has pointed out. It is even more tightly knit than the CIA. In fact, according to Ostrovsky there is what one might call an assassinations "board of directors" within the Mossad and no assassination can be orchestrated by the Mossad without a formal vote of approval by this board.

There's another important thing to remember here: it is highly unlikely that the Mossad—at least at that juncture in history—would have ever considered killing the president of the United States unless it knew that it had the institutional consent of the CIA, at the very least. Israel's position was highly precarious in 1963 and for the Mossad—or even so-called "rogue elements" of the Mossad—to attempt the assassination of the American president without the assurance that it had the support of the CIA, for example, would have been a rash move indeed. So there were no "rogue" Mossad elements involved in the assassination of JFK."

KILL JFK = 'OPERATION HAMAN'

Voir: Haman et les assassinats politiques (HUSSEIN, STALINE, HITLER, LE TSAR, etc.)
Haman associé à la Croix du Christ (symbole de la croix: une "abomination" associée au Christ et à Haman pendu à un gibet en croix.)

Operation Haman comme nom de l'opération visant à tuer JFK... C'est pas prouvé mais vraisemblable. Ce nom illustre bien ce que représentait l'opération consistant à tuer Kennedy, quels intérêts ça servait. Pour comprendre le personnage maudit de Haman dans le drame du peuple juif devant-toujours-se-battre-pour-sa-survie, il faut relire le livre d'Esther. 

Voyez ce que le livre de Michael Collins Piper sur l'assassinat de JFK intitulé "FINAL JUDGMENT" révèle concernant cette habitude juive consistant à identifier ses ennemis à Haman pour les faire assassiner. Piper intitule même sa conclusion "Operation Haman? The Theory That Works":

(...)However, the primary reason behind Ben-Gurion's departure was the Israeli leader's inability to pressure JFK into accepting Israel's demands. According to Hersh: "There was no way for the Israeli public . . . to suspect that there was yet another factor in Ben-Gurion's demise: his increasingly bitter impasse with Kennedy over a nuclear-armed Israel." (143) Ben-Gurion had failed. The battle had been lost, but the war between the two men was still to be won.
A MODERN-DAY HAMAN?
What was on Ben-Gurion's mind as he turned over the reins of government to his successor? What was David Ben-Gurion's final act as Prime Minister of the Jewish State? In light of Ben-Gurion's explicit comment to John F. Kennedy that "my people have the right to exist . . and this existence is in danger," we can certainly make a good presumption.
In Ben-Gurion's eyes, John F. Kennedy was clearly a modern-day Haman—an enemy of the Jewish people. In Jewish folklore, Haman was a descendant of the Amalekites who served as prime minister to King Ahasueros of Persia. It was Haman who sought to convince the king that all of the Jews of his empire should be exterminated forever.
However, according to legend, a beautiful Jewish temptress named Esther used her feminine wiles on Ahasueros and, in the end, it was Haman who was instead put to death. The important Jewish holiday of Purim celebrates the deliverance of the Jews from Haman's intended holocaust.
In the Bible—Deut 25:19, I Sam. 15:8—the ancient Hebrews were urged to "blot out the memory of the Amalekites" from whom Haman descended.
In Israel—in 1963—David Ben-Gurion certainly looked upon John F. Kennedy as a modern-day Haman, a son of the Amalekites. As he pondered the brutal conflict with JFK, Ben-Gurion no doubt remembered the meditation that is read on Purim:
"A wicked man, an arrogant offshoot of the seed of Amalek, rose up against us. Insolent in his riches, he digged himself a pit, and his own greatness laid him a snare. In his mind he thought to entrap, but was himself entrapped; he sought to destroy, but was himself speedily destroyed . . . he made him a gallows, and was himself hanged thereon."
(...)
THE COMING OF THE MESSIAH
With John F. Kennedy lying in a grave in Arlington National Cemetery, Israel was safe—for the time being at least. The modern-day heir of Haman's legacy had been destroyed. That Lyndon Johnson—a man with a steadfast history of loyalty to Israel and its American lobby—was in line to assume the American presidency was a fact not gone unnoticed. Israel's messiah had come.
(...)"CONCLUSION: Operation Haman? The Theory That Works"(...)
Was there a code name for the conspiracy against President Kennedy? More than likely. But we, of course, will surely never know its name. Did the Mossad, perhaps, call it "Operation Haman"—naming the conspiracy to kill the American president after Haman, the ancient Amalekite conspirator who desired the destruction of the Jewish people? That code name would be as reasonable as any, considering Ben-Gurion's hatred for Kennedy—a modern-day Haman in his eyes.
(...)
In 1979 when Connally launched a well-financed bid for the 1980 Republican presidential nomination, he publicly challenged the power of the Israeli lobby in a highly controversial speech that, by all accounts, led to the end of Connally's presidential ambitions once and for all.
But what is interesting is that Connally' s speech was considered so inflammatory by the Israelis and their Americans supporters that a prominent Israeli educator and philosopher, Emmanuel Rackman, president of Bal Ilan University, actually called for Connally's assassination.
Comparing Connally to Haman, the ancient enemy of the Jewish people, Rackman—a rabbi—issued his call for Connally's assassination in the November 18, 1979 issue of The Jewish Week-American Examiner, the publication of the Israeli-government owned Jewish Telegraph Agency, a subdivision of the worldwide Jewish Agency.
Rackman's vicious attack on Connally was headlined: "John Connally Campaign Seen as Dire Threat to Israel and U.S. Jewry." Rackman quoted New York Times columnist William Safire as having said that for "the first time, a candidate for President has delivered a major address which he knew would disturb and dismay every American supporter of Israel."(986)
Rackman commented: "This is true. But does not this observation signify more than it says? Does it not mean that in Connally we have, for the first time, a candidate who in no uncertain terms is telling the American people that he does not want the support of Jews and that he wants to prove that one can be elected president without Jewish support.
"Furthermore, does it not mean that at long last we have a candidate who hopes to get elected by mobilizing support from all who share his total disregard of how Jews feel about him and is this not an invitation to all anti-Semites to rally behind him? I am generally not an alarmist but nothing in American politics in recent years so disturbed me as Connally's subtle communication to Jews that they can `go to the devil.' Even the Nixon tapes were not so upsetting.
"The American Jewish community must be alerted. If only we had stopped Hitler early enough, millions of Jews would still be alive. And Connally must be stopped at all costs. He must not even get near the nomination! He must be destroyed, at least politically, as soon as possible.
It is sufficiently early to make Connally look ridiculous and destroy him politically without bloodshed.
"Perhaps I am overreacting," said Rackman. "But if I have learned anything especially from the rabbinic view of Biblical history it is that we are less fearful and more forgiving of enemies who at least accord us a modicum of respect than we are of enemies who treat us with disdain, with contempt. That makes Arafat more acceptable than Connally." (987)
Rackman compared Connally with Amalek, another foe of the Jewish people: "'Remember Amalek,' we are told. 'Don't forget.' Eradicate him from the face of the earth. Simply because Amalek had no respect for us. He encountered us in his path and casually sought to exterminate us as vermin.
It is my fervent prayer," said this Jewish religious leader, "that American Jewry will not minimize the importance of the challenge they have been given and will act speedily and with devastating effectiveness."(988)
John Connally was not eradicated as Rackman urged. But his political career came to a halt after the major media began a campaign against him.
However, when John Connally died in 1993, the doctors said that Connally's fatal lung condition was a direct outgrowth of the chest wounds that he had received in the shooting in Dallas on November 22, 1963. So ultimately, in the end, John Connally did prove to be yet another victim of Israel—as much as if he had died on the same day as John F. Kennedy.

Si vous n'avez le temps de lire qu'un seul livre sur le sujet....

FREE EBOOK: FALSE FLAGS - TEMPLATE FOR TERROR: An analytical Critique of the Covert Model Utilized by the Conspirators Who Orchestrated 9-11, the Oklahoma City Bombing, the JFK Assassination, Sandy Hook and Boston, by Michael Collins Piper
FALSE FLAGS
Template for Terror

An Analytical Critique of the Covert Model Utilized by the Conspirators Who Orchestrated 9-11, the Oklahoma City Bombing, the JFK Assassination, Sandy Hook and Boston

Michael Collins Piper


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface:

What this book is about..........................................................................................................................13

Foreword:

Yes, American Leaders Pondered Staging False Flag Attacks on American Citizens................................ 19

Introduction:

What We “Know”About Terrorism And Why (and How) We Know About It.........................................23

Chapter One:

A Bad Habit : Israel’s Use of “False Flags” in Global Terrorism...............................................................27

Chapter Two:

How Could Anyone Come Up With the Theory of Mossad Involvement in the JFK Assassination?..........35

Chapter Three:

JFK’s Secret War With Israel Over Nuclear Weapons............................................................................44

Chapter Four:

The Myth of Dallas: The “Ring Wing” False Flag in the JFK Conspiracy..................................................57

Chapter Five:

The Man in the Middle: E. Howard Hunt and the JFK Assassination.......................................................64

Chapter Six:

The “Dummy” Assassination: E. Howard Hunt and the Events in Dallas...................................................79

Chapter Seven:

The Trumped-Up Story of E. Howard Hunt’s So-Called “Deathbed Confession”....................................95

Chapter Eight:

The Mossad’s “Explanation” of “What Really Happened” in Dallas....................................................... 110

Chapter Nine:

False Flag Number One: The Manipulation of Lee Harvey Oswald From New Orleans to Dallas...........114

Chapter Ten:

“Our New Backers Are the Jews—As Soon as They Take Care of JFK”.............................................124

Chapter Eleven:

Yes, the Mossad Was Behind the Oklahoma City Bombing...................................................................129

Chapter Twelve:

Andreas Strassmeir: The Mossad’s Man in Place in the Oklahoma Bombing..........................................137

Chapter Thirteen:

Timothy McVeigh and the Anti-Defamation League: Long-Time Mossad Monitoring of the “Patsy”.........145

Chapter Fourteen:

“The Arabs Did It”: Zionist Propaganda and Oklahoma City.................................................................150

Chapter Fifteen:

A Familiar Template for Terror and A Scenario That Does Make Sense...............................................155

Chapter Sixteen: September 11, 2001:

“The Big Winner Today is Israel”.........................................................................................................163

Chapter Seventeen:

Blame Everybody but Israel................................................................................................................170

Chapter Eighteen:

The Mossad Link(s) to the First WTC Attack (in 1993)......................................................................179

Chapter Nineteen:

The Dancing Israelis Who Celebrated on 9-11....................................................................................186

Chapter Twenty:

The Israelis Who Were (or Were Not) There.....................................................................................199

Chapter Twenty-One:

Israel’s Capacity to Monitor Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.......................................................................202

Chapter Twenty-Two:

A “September Surprise” for George W. Bush?..................................................................................209

Chapter Twenty-Three:

Were Those Hijackers Really Arabs or WereThey Really Israeli “Mista’Arvim”?...............................218

Chapter Twenty-Four:

Israel’s Covert Manipulation of Muslim Extremists: Toward Understanding Israel’s Role in 9-11........230

Chapter Twenty-Five:

Israel’s Agents Inside Al-Qaeda: A Critical Element of the Template for Terror on 9-11....................238

Chapter Twenty-Six:

Onward Christian Soldiers : What Really Happened on 9-11...........................................................250

Chapter Twenty-Seven:

Two SimpleWords.........................................................................................................................269

Chapter Twenty-Eight:

9-11 and the New Internet Paradigm.............................................................................................272

Chapter Twenty-Nine:

The Crisis Management Conspiracy:
The High-Level Experiment in False Flag Crowd Psychology Utilized at Sandy Hook and Boston..279

Chapter Thirty:

Who “The Crisis Actors” Really Are:
How Truth Seekers Were Manipulated Into Ignoring Genuine False Flag Terrorism........................306

Conclusion: It’s Time to Take “The Stand”.....................................................................................320