Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Documentaire retiré des ondes sous les pressions

Devinez quel lobby a fait fléchir Radio-Cadenas pour qu'il retire des ondes le documentaire "Paix, Propagande et La Terre Promise"...

(Si vous lisez l'anglais, vous avez pas à deviner.)


More J-w Censorship

Zionist J-ws don’t want us to know about what’s going on in Palestine. Why is that?
On October 23, 2008 Radio Canada’s “Les Grands Reportages” aired Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land. This is an excellent documentary which exposes the disconnect between what is taking place on the ground in Palestine and the American media’s reporting of these events. It can be viewed on google videos.
A systematic pressure campaign was organized against Radio-Canada for airing this documentary and resulted in an investigation by the Ombudsman. In her report, it is clear that the Ombudsman has adopted all the pro-occupation arguments of the complainants. She comes to the conclusion that the documentary should never have been aired. Read Radio-Canada Ombudsman’s report.

Read the Ombudsmans cave-in to Zionists like the Quebec-Isr-el Committee.
I received 156 complaints about this broadcast. Most of those filing complaints, who were in various countries, did so in response to an appeal by HonestReporting Canada, a pro-Israel media watchdog that encouraged visitors to its website to send complaints to my office
Oh dear! The Zionist J-ws launch a campaign.
The documentary Paix, propagande et Terre promise meets these criteria. The film claims, without proving it, that the government of Israel controls U.S. print and electronic media. In order to illustrate this argument, the film uses excerpts from television newscasts that fail to mention the fact that the Palestinian territories are occupied by Israel. This omission, the choice of words, and the routine absence of context reinforce false perceptions among the U.S. public, according to the film. There is no fairness, balance, or nuance here: this pro-Palestinian documentary presents one point of view, one side of the coin. All those interviewed—academics, Israeli and Palestinian activists, media critics and journalists—agree with this perspective.
What is not mentioned is that 100% of the reporting on the CBC is pro-Isr-el, ever since the CJC J-w Rabbinovitch was head of CBC. But careers in Canada are dependent upon serving the J-w, so the Ombudsman caved for her self-interest.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Dans les bureaux du New York Times

Monday, March 30, 2009

New York Times personnel: Susan Chira

Susan Chira, is the chief Foreign Editor of the flagship Zionist newspaper, The New York Times.
Previously, she was the editor of the "Week in Review" section at The Times, after having served as deputy foreign editor of the newspaper since February 1997. Prior to that, she served in a variety of reporting positions including national education correspondent, correspondent for the newspaper in Tokyo from October 1984 until February 1989, metropolitan reporter in the Albany and Stamford bureaus, and reporter for the Business Day section. Ms. Chira joined The Times as a trainee on the metropolitan desk in 1981 and was promoted to reporter in July 1982. Ms. Chira received a B.A. degree in history and East Asian studies from Harvard University. As an undergraduate, she was a reporter and later president of The Harvard Crimson. Ms. Chira is married to Michael Shapiro, a professor of journalism at the Columbia University School of Journalism. *** This is one in a continuing series of reports on New York Times personnel. Previous entries have included Jill Abramson and Laurie Goodstein; also Constance Rosenblum and Molly Birnbaum. Also: Karen W. Arenson and Isabel Kershner and Alissa J. Rubin and Sharon Waxman.
Thomas L. Friedman is a New York Times columnist who openly advocates making Palestinian civilians suffer pain. Mr. Friedman is a favorite of the owners and editors of the Times.
Andrew Rosenthal controls the editorial page.
Daniel H. Cohen is a member of the board of directors of the Times.
Arthur Sulzberger Jr. representing the Sulzberger family, is the controlling stockholder of the New York Times. 
Monday, April 06, 2009

New York Times personnel: Martin Gottlieb

Martin Gottlieb is in charge of the "global edition" of The New York Times, with responsibility for The International Herald Tribune.
Previously he served as associate managing editor of The Times in charge of the weekend editions. He has also been editor-in-chief of The Village Voice and managing editor of The New York Daily News.

This is one in a continuing series of reports on New York Times personnel.  


Selon le NY Times, il faut "éduquer" le Hamas 

Chabad & The NY Times 

Le NY Times embauche le grand prêtre néocon Bill Kristol

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Une croquée de plus de 50 milliards de dollars



Icône de chaîne

Madoff le psychopathe

Des organisations philantropiques menacées

Souriant, Madoff pourrait plaider la folie

Inquiétude juive entourant la crise financière et le scandale Madoff

Preuve scientifique de l'existence du Lobby

Samedi 28 février 2009
Pedro Arroja à démontrer de manière scientifique et irréfutable l’existence du lobby juif

Un économiste portugais, Pedro Arroja, s’est employé à démontrer de manière scientifique et irréfutable l’existence du lobby juif, Ben Shalom Bernanke

"Le fait est que sous l'administration Bush deux juifs occupèrent la charge de Président de la Réserve Fédérale. C’est en 2006 qu’Alan Greenspan, qui avait été nommé à ce poste par le Président Reagan en 1986, céda sa place à l’actuel président, Ben S. Bernanke, nommé quant à lui par le Président Bush.

Ma question est la suivante: quelle est la probabilité que, parmi les candidats ayant des compétences et qualifications équivalentes pour occuper le poste de Président de la Réserve Fédérale, le choix se porte précisément sur deux juifs - l'un à la suite de l'autre - en admettant qu’aucune autre considération ou influence n’intervienne dans le choix ?

Sachant que la communauté juive aux Etats-Unis représente 2.5% de la population totale, il s'ensuit que la probabilité qu'il y ait successivement deux Présidents juifs de la Réserve Fédérale est de l’ordre de 0.06%, ce qui est une impossibilité pratique.

Nonobstant, c’est ce qui est arrivé.Il faut néanmoins souligner que la culture juive attache beaucoup d'importance à l'éducation et qu'il y plus d’hommes et de femmes de mérite dans cette culture que dans la culture chrétienne ou autres. Je vais donc postuler que les juifs sont trois fois meilleurs [l'utilisation du vocable "meilleur" au lieu de "plus compétent" n'est évidemment pas innocente] que les non-juifs et que, bien que représentant à peine 2.5% de la population, la probabilité qu'un juif soit nommé à la tête de la Réserve Fédérale est donc trois fois supérieure, à savoir de 7.5%. Dans ces conditions, quelle est donc la probabilité que deux Présidents successifs de la Réserve Fédérale soient juifs? La réponse est 0.56%, ce qui est également une impossibilité pratique. Cependant, c'est ce qui est arrivé.

Je vais donc formuler la question différemment. Combien de fois faut-il que les juifs soient meilleurs [plus compétents] que les hommes et les femmes issus d'autres cultures en Amérique (où une majorité écrasante est chrétienne) pour (…) qu'il y ait une probabilité supérieure à 50% que "deux Présidents successifs de la Réserve Fédérale soient juifs", supposant toujours qu’hormis le mérite aucune autre considération ou influence n'intervienne dans le processus de choix ?La réponse est d'environ 30 fois.

Comme il est invraisemblable qu’en moyenne les juifs soient 30 fois meilleurs [plus compétents] que les chrétiens, la conclusion qui s’impose est que le choix du Président de la Réserve Fédérale n’obéit pas exclusivement à des critères de mérite et que des considérations ou influences d'un autre ordre interviennent."

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Le jugement imminent des espions de l'AIPAC soulève l'inquiétude


AIPAC espionage case becomes US trouble
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:47:10 GMT

AIPAC is considered the most powerful and connected lobbying group in Washington.
The Justice Department is feeling the heat as it continues the prosecution of former AIPAC staffers Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman.

The two officials from the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) were in 2005 indicted for passing along secret US documents to Israel in violation of the 1917 Espionage Act.

The American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League, two top Jewish lobby groups in the US, are demanding the Justice Department reconsider its case against Rosen and Weissman.

"The prosecution creates a chilling effect on legitimate speech," AJC Executive Director David Harris said in a statement last week.

"Based upon the facts that the government has divulged thus far, we hope the Department of Justice will take a close look at this case and reconsider whether it should be pursued further," he added.

In late 2004, the New York Times reported that Weissman along with fellow AIPAC employee Rosen had been questioned regarding their involvement in an espionage case.

Larry Franklin, a Middle East analyst at the Defense Intelligence Agency, was also driven into the case for allegedly passing classified information about Iran to the AIPAC members who had relayed the sensitive information to the government of Israel.

The ADL also recently released a letter it had sent last September to the deputy attorney general urging him to "review the charges, the investigation, and the prosecution of this case."

"We are mindful of and fully support our government's need to protect sensitive national security information," read the letter. "This prosecution, however, is not necessary for such protection."

The Anti-Defamation League has come under severe criticism from political analysts for serving Israel's interests rather than those of the United States.

"The ADL has virtually become 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the US, as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.," renowned American author and political analyst Noam Chomsky wrote in his 1989 book Necessary Illusions.

"These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with US support, to move towards a general political settlement," he adds.

Meanwhile, AIPAC, considered the most powerful and connected lobbying group in Washington, has been subject to controversy in the past.

In 1992, the group's then president David Steiner was forced to resign after he was recorded boasting about his political influence in obtaining aid for Israel.

Steiner claimed to be "negotiating" with the incoming Clinton administration over who Clinton would appoint as Secretary of State and Director of the National Security Agency.

AIPAC is a "de facto agent for a foreign government", whose "success is due to its ability to reward legislators and congressional candidates who support its agenda, and to punish those who challenge it," University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt from the Harvard University argue in their book: The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.

Former President Jimmy Carter has also accused AIPAC of putting enormous pressure on politicians running for office who do not share AIPAC's goals.


Steve Rosen Accuses AIPAC of Espionage Steven J. Rosen’s defamation lawsuit against the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is now entering a critical phase. A series of cross-filings stakes out the critical court terrain. Rosen intends to show that obtaining and leveraging classified U.S. government information in the service of Israel is common practice at AIPAC. He claims it was unfair for AIPAC to fire and malign him in the press after he was indicted on espionage charges in 2005. AIPAC’s defense team is committed to getting the case thrown out on technicalities before it goes to trial early next year.

Jewish Correspondent Andrea Mitchell, wife of Jewish former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, interviews Jewish Rep. Harman on her involvement with the Jewish lobby, and an alleged Jewish spy

Wiretap scandal of leading Democrat 'who lobbied for Israeli spies'

Sources: U.S. may drop AIPAC spy case

'US may drop AIPAC classified leak case'
Former lobbyists allegedly shared classified info on US policy with reporters and former diplomats.

What Israeli lobby?: Prosecutors Considering Dropping Espionage Charges Against Former AIPAC Lobbyists
U.S. Congresswoman denies interceding in Israel spy case
Jane Harman allegedly overheard agreeing to seek favorable treatment for investigated AIPAC lobbyists.
Adding Insult to Injury–Powerful Jewish Groups Demand Case Against Accused Spies Be Dropped

Accused Israel spy hints at FBI anti-Semitism in AIPAC probe

Secrets nucléaires vendus à Israel par les criminels habituels

Cheney furieux que Bush n'ait pas pardonné "Scooter" Libby

Espion américain pour Israel arrêté après 23 ans

Libby inculpé site à une plainte à MSNBC

La sécurité nucléaire au coeur du scandale d'espionnage à l'AIPAC

The Samson Gambit

Declassified FBI File Alleges an Israeli Intelligence Agent Worked at AIPAC

La fin de l'histoire: un monde uni


UN HOMME DE SON TEMPS: À l'ère de la mondialisation, Dominique Strauss-Kahn plaide pour une solution globale au problème de la richesse des nations. HAARETZ- Will U.S. financial woes lead to new world order? Buffet parle d'un "Pearl Harbor" économique Ron Paul: ils oeuvrent à un gouvernement mondial Kissinger sings the NWO song Seul un nouveau système international... NO WORLD ORDER! Admirez le modèle de la tour qui replacera le World Trade Center. Elle devait s'appeler Freedom Tower (tour de la Liberté), mais son nom a été changé pour One World Trade Center (centre du Commerce du Monde Uni).

Image: artist rendering of One World Trade Center building

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Le 11 septembre n'est plus un mystère

William Kristol (père du PNAC), Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Eliott Abrams et Douglas Feith. Ces néoconservateurs influents ont joué un rôle de premier plan pour la réalisation de la guerre en Irak. Ils sont tous juifs.

On n'a pas besoin d'une preuve irréfutable qu'Israël était impliqué dans le 11 septembre 2001. Pourquoi? Parce c'est ce que les circonstances globales révèlent à notre bon sens:

1. Le complexe du WTC était la possession d'un Juif (Larry Silverstein) qui a des liens directs avec deux premiers ministres d'Israël: Ariel Sharon & Benjamin Netanyahu.

2. Le détenteur d'hypothèse de Silverstein est Juif, l'homme qui a convenu du contrat est Juif, le PDG de Blackstone Group est aussi Juif.

3. Le Pentagone est hautement infiltré dans les plus hauts niveaux. Le département de la Défense à l'époque était contrôlé par des Juifs et des Sionistes.

4. Les Lobby les plus puissants à Washington, D.C. (AIPAC, AEI, JINSA) qui déterminent les politiques étrangères sont contrôlés par et pour des Juifs.

5. Les premières personnes à êtres arrêtées après les attaques du 11 septembre étaient Juifs (les Israéliens dansants de la Urban Moving Company façade du Mossad), tout comme celui qui les a libéré: Michael Chertoff du Deptartment of Homeland Security.

6. Le Rabbin Dov Zakheim (à l'époque ministre de la Défense et membre du PNAC) est connu comme étant le "cerveau" du 11 septembre.

7. Les compagnies de hautes technologies (la RSA) qui ont brisé les codes de communications secrètes du NORAD et du FAA, qui fournissent les logiciels de sécurité (PTech) aux USA et à l'OTAN, ainsi que celles qui sont entrées dans les banques de données d'ordinateurs et de téléphone (Amdocs et Comverse) étaient une propriété de l'État Israel.

8. Israël et les Sionistes ont la main mise sur toutes les banques au sommet de la pyramide de contrôle mondial.

9. Ils étaient aussi en charge de la sécurité aux tours du WTC et aux aéroports du 11 septembre. Une seule entité avait un accès interne à tous les aéroports vitaux du 11 septembre pour violer la sécurité - c'était une compagnie israélienne (ICTS).

10. Le monopole médiatique américain est entre les mains de Juifs Sionistes - les désinformateurs qui ont modelé l'opinion publique et ont travaillé en relation symbiotique avec les autres acteurs du 'cover up'.

11. Le plan des attaques du 11 septembre a été mis sur papier par des sionistes néoconservateurs, dont plusieurs sont Juifs et de double nationalité israélo-américaine: Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Elliot Abrams, Donald Kagan, Richard Haas, Kenneth Adelman, Edward Luttwak, Robert Satloff, David Frum, David Wurmser, Steve Goldsmith, Marc Grossman (signataires PNAC & Rebuilding America's Defense, 'Catastrophic Terrorism' in Foreign Affairs)

Quatre points stratégiques devaient impérativement être mis en place avant les attaques du 11 septembre pour que l'opération fonctionne:

a) George W. Bush devait être élu président en novembre 2000.

b) Le Pentagone et la Défense devaient être sous le contrôlé de l'intérieur par des agents.

c) Les tours du WTC devaient être achetées à la ville de New York (par Silverstein).

d) La sécurité aux aéroports du 11 septembre et au complexe du WTC devait être sous contrôle.

Petit rappel historique. Un autre important false flag israélien contre les USA est l'attaque contre le USS Liberty. Des articles récents de journaux "mainstream" (Haaretz, Chicago Tribune) rapportent qu'il est maintenant prouvé que les forces israéliennes savaient ce qu'ils faisaient quand ils ont coulé le bateau étatsunien..

L'assassinat de JFK fut une autre attaque qui changea radicalement le cours de la politique américaine du tout au tout. Michael Collins Piper a montré l'origine sioniste du complot contre JFK dans son bestseller Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Conspiracy. La section photo commentées ainsi que plusieurs parties du livre sont disponibles gratuitement sur le site http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/...products_id=17


From Lisa Giuliani, wife of Victor Thorn, author of 911-Evil:

I can weigh in on the issue of Israel-Zionist involvement in 9-11.

1. The WTC complex was purchased by a jewish man (Larry silverstein) who has direct ties to two of Israel's Prime Ministers: Ariel Sharon & Benjamin Netanyahu.

2. Silverstein's mortgage holder was Jewish, the man who arranged the deal was Jewish, the CEO of Blackstone Group also Jewish.

3. The Pentagon is highly infiltrated at the highest levels. The Defense Policy Board at the time was controlled by Jewish men and Zionists.

4. Most powerful lobbyist groups in Washington, D.C. (AIPAC, AEI) that determine foreign policy are Jewish oriented/controlled.

5. The first people arrested only hours after the 9-11 attacks were Jewish (Dancing Israelis), as was the man who eventually freed them, Michael Chertoff.

6. Dov Zakheim - known as the 9-11 Mastermind (Jewish)

7. The high tech companies that broke america's secret communication codes and back-doored their way into computer and telephone databanks were Israeli-owned.

8. Israel-Zionists have a firm grip on the banks at the top of the world's control pyramid.

9 They were also in charge of security at the WTC towers and the airports on 9-11. Only one entity had inside access to all of the vital airports on 9-11 in order to breech security - it was an Israeli-owned company.

10. The American mass media monopoly is Jewish/zionist owned and controlled - the spinmeisters who shaped public perception and have worked in a symbiotic relationship with the other players > cover-up.

11. The blueprint for the 9-11 attack was penned by rabid zionists, many of them Jewish. (PNAC report, Rebuilding America's Defenses)

Four Strategic focal points had to be set in place before the 9-11 attacks could take place:

a) Imperative that George W. Bush be selected President in November, 2000.

b) The Pentagon and Defense forces had to be commandeered by the inside culprits.

c) The WTC towers needed to be purchased from NYC's Port Authority.

d) Security at specific airports and at the WTC complex had to be controlled.

These four points had to be locked in to set the wheels of 9-11 in motion.

The entire 9-11 operation was Israeli-controlled, from soup to nuts. Israel had the means, the motive, the opportunity,and the resources to pull it off (with help from their cronies ).

It gets more involved than this, but the above gives you a pretty good idea, I think. Our book (not Michael Collin's Piper's book) on Israel's central role in 9-11 should be released in a few weeks.

Soup to nuts, name one other nation in the world who had the means, motive, opportunity and resources to pull off 9-11. Who, among nations, has benefitted from 9-11 and the subsequent war on terror the most? Israel.


The High Priests of War

The Secret History of How America's Zionist "Neo-Conservative" Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empire

by Michael Collins Piper

Articles by Michael Collins Piper

Get it on American Free Press

The report that follows is based on this foundation:

* THAT the war against Iraq being waged by the American administration of President George W. Bush is not only contrary to traditional "conservative" American principles, but contrary to all principles of American foreign policy during the last half century;

* THAT the war against Iraq is being waged for far more broad ranging purposes than "regime change" or "eliminating weapons of mass destruction"; first and foremost, as part of an overall effort to establish the United States as the sole international super-power, capable military and economically, to suppress any nations and/or peoples who dare to challenge American hegemony;

* THAT the war against Iraq is simply a first step in a long-standing, wide-ranging plan to launch an even more aggressive move against the entire Arab Middle East in order to "remake the Arab world" to secure the survival of - and expand the power of - THE STATE OF ISRAEL;

* THAT the war against Iraq is only the initial target of this carefully planned scheme and that, ultimately, other Arab and Muslim states are slated for outright extinction or some form of occupation or control by American military and political forces (IN ALLIANCE WITH ISRAEL);

* THAT the war against Iraq and the plan for the subjugation of the Arab people is quite simply a modified, modernized adaptation of the historic zionist dream of "Greater Israel," adjusted to meet the demands of the international oil companies, which are, in turn, fully prepared to share the aim of dominating the oil producing states of the Arab world IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE STATE OF ISRAEL;

* THAT the war against Iraq was deliberately orchestrated by a small but powerful network of hard-line "right wing" Zionist elements - the self-styled "neo-conservatives" - at the highest levels of the Bush administration, skillfully aided and abetted by like-minded persons in public policy organizations, think tanks, publications and other institutions, all of which are closely interconnected and, in turn linked to HARD-LINE "LIKUDNIK" FORCES IN ISRAEL;

* THAT the war against Iraq and the additional moves by the United States against the Arab world that are slated to follow can be traced to Zionist political intrigue inside the upper levels of the U.S. intelligence community, reaching as far back as the early 1970s, and that many of the same players involved in that activity are now guiding Bush administration policy today;

* THAT the war against Iraq is an adjunct to the previously declared "war against terrorism" which was, in itself, part of a long evolving and carefully coordinated propaganda campaign founded on the theory that terrorism is somehow an "Arab" trait.

Other sources:

Neoconservatism as a jewish movement, Ph.D. Kevin B. Macdonald

White man's burden: The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. By Ari Shavit, Haaretz, 200

Pro-surge grop is almost all jewish, JTA News, 08/24/2007

The war on Iraq: Conceived in Israel, By STEPHEN J. SNIEGOSKI, 2003

No War For Israel

Friday, May 11, 2007

Israel and 9/11

"It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel]"

Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, September 11, 2001

Cui bono? Who benefited from the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001? It wasn't Muslims.

Israel and its agents have infiltrated the American political system on all levels, and over the decades have consolidated a virtual stranglehold over the legislative, judicial and executive branches via a well-established network of individuals, organisations and lobby groups. The so-called neoconservatives who occupy Washington - most of them Jewish and many of them dual citizenship Israeli-Americans - have structured the foreign policy of the United States of America around the best interests of the State of Israel and the geopolitical ideology of Zionism, thus fomenting wars in the Middle East to fulfill the strategic regional objectives of Israel, which has not only cost the lives of countless clueless Americans but threatens to bring down their entire nation.

The 9/11 event was a Zionist false flag operation designed to kick-start the "war on terror"; the "new Pearl Harbor" that the neocon think tank the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) authors called for in the Rebuilding America's Defenses [.pdf] policy document (summary here). The mass trauma of September 11 was the 'catalyzing event' presciently mentioned by the authors of the RAD paper which cleared the way for the implementation of the PNAC plan: Israeli-American hegemony via an aggressive policy of preemptive war, regime change and a restructuring of the Middle East to ensure the regional dominance of the Jewish state.

Israel's influence in post-9/11, Zionist-occupied Washington is so great that it has managed to mobilise the world's largest war machine to fight two proxy wars in the Middle East for the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv, both within two years of the 2001 attacks, at the expense of the lives of America's sons and daughters and its moral standing in the global community -- two bloody wars that continue to claim American, Afghani and Iraqi lives to the present day. None of it would've been possible without the 9/11 catalyst, which is testimony to the success of the project.

An endless torrent of pro-war lies, propaganda and spin continues to spew forth from the Israelis and their American counterparts with regard to non-existent Iranian nukes and the supposed threat they pose to Israel and America, while belligerent Israel, armed to the teeth with nukes, clearly constitutes the gravest threat to peace in the region. Iran's nuclear energy program is perfectly legal under international law, and the Iranian government has abided by its international obligations by permitting U.N. weapons inspectors access to its facilities. Israel, on the other hand, developed its nuclear weapons arsenal by way of deceit, theft, and duplicity, and insists on a transparently deceptive policy of 'nuclear ambiguity' to hide its arsenal of nukes, evading the U.N. weapons inspections, economic sanctions, worldwide condemnation and the threat of war that has been imposed on Iran and its people. Military strikes on Iran are clearly next on the Zionist agenda, but with such a lack of support from the public, this could be the year we see the next false flag terror event, or as some have speculated, a Gulf of Tonkin type provocation such as the one that served as the pretext for military intervention in Vietnam. If Israel were to stage a false flag attack on an American naval vessel, it would not be without precedent.

Zionist influence is now so powerful and so pervasive in America that U.S. Middle East policy is determined by no other criteria than that which serves the geopolitical objectives of the State of Israel. U.S. foreign policy is essentially Israeli foreign policy - thus the attacks on Afghanistan, the insanity of preemptive war and occupation in Iraq, and the planned strike on Iran - all disastrous policy decisions that benefit the Zionist parasite to the detriment of America and the rest of the world.

9/11 was a false flag attack on the United States, designed to kick-start Netanyahu's nonsensical "war on terror" doctrine and garner public support for war with Israel's perceived enemies, those "existential threats" to Zionism: the Arab states and whoever else stands in the way of a "Greater Israel". It was an Israeli psy-op conceived by a Zionist elite, and it was a roaring success.

It is assumed that the reader has conducted their own investigation of 9/11 and concluded that the attacks were not planned and perpetrated by Muslims [.pdf], that WTC buildings 1, 2 & 7 did not collapse due to plane impact and/or jet fueled-fires, and that the official story is a lie, so those issues aren't addressed here. It was an inside job; the question now is whodunnit.

This brief summary of the evidence connecting Israel to the events surrounding the attacks of 9/11/01 is in point form and by no means exhaustive or complete, so in most cases only one of many available online references is provided via hyperlink.

the evidence


The Odigo warnings; Haaretz report on Odigo

Zim Shipping

Dov Zakheim's System Planning Corporation (SPS)

WTC scrap shipped overseas by Jewish CEO of Metals Management Inc.

Israeli security firms in charge at airports (ICTS)

Put options placed on airlines by Israelis and A.B. Krongard

The Greenberg Family (AIG, ACE, Kroll Associates)

Personal / Political

Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy's last minute WTC lease

Silverstein and Lowy's personal friendships with Israeli political elites, former PMs etc (Ariel Sharon, Bibi Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert et al)

Larry Silverstein's WTC7 "pull it" remark

Ehud Olmert was in NY on 9/11

Benjamin Netanyahu in NY on 9/11 and London on 7/7

Netanyahu says 9/11 attacks good for Israel

Zionist Jew Michael Mukasey's handling of 9/11 litigation

Michael Mukasey ordered release of Israeli spies

Michael Chertoff's role in releasing the Israeli spies

Dov Zakheim's connection to SPC and the missing trillions

Lewis Eisenberg's role in securing the WTC lease

The Eisenberg, Silverstein, Lowy et al mutual UJA connection

PNAC's 9/11 prescience in the RAD document, which called for a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor"

Wolfowitz's speech to Westpoint graduates, 2001

Zionist Jew Jerome Hauer of Kroll Associates hired FBI counter-terrorism expert John O'Neill as head of security at the WTC on Sept 10, 2001, where he was killed the next day. O'Neill and one of his colleagues had allegedly uncovered Israeli spying operations in New York and New Jersey.

Military / Intelligence

Israeli art student network

The dancing Israelis, Urban Moving Systems and Dominik Suter

Israelis caught in vans containing explosive residue (TNT, RDX)

Jewish Mossad agents posing as al Qaeda "terrorists"

Cousin of alleged hijacker exposed as Israeli spy; Members of Israeli spy ring busted in Lebanon related to 9/11 hijacker

U.S. military computer network 'secured' by Israeli computer software (Ptech Inc.); Israeli Trojan penetrates U.S. Telecom system

Israeli commando attack on the Mexican Parliament building a few weeks after 9/11

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga reveals publicly that 9/11 was carried out by the Mossad and Zionist interests

Daniel Lewin of Israeli special ops unit Sayeret Matkal onboard Flight 11

Israel and the anthrax murders


9/11: tout finit par se savoir

The liberal party expulses a great woman Truther

The neocon's ties to the 911 Commission Report

Zelikow et le mythe fondateur du 21e siècle américain

Al-Qaida ou Al-Mossad?

L'affaire Chauprade

Le terroriste le plus meurtrier de l'histoire

Du terrorisme signé Israel

Du trotskyisme au néoconservatisme

Michael Collins Piper contre la mafia juive

Grands prêtres de guerre

911: les USA et Israel en coulisses

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Des néocons pour l'extension du Patriot Act

24 GOP members of Congress approve of legislation extending worst aspects of reviled Patriot Acts
REPUBLICAN MEMBERS in Congress introduced legislation in early March to reauthorize some of the most controversial portions of the misnamed Patriot Act, which are set to expire this year.
Reps. Eric Cantor (Va.), John Boehner (Ohio), Mike Pence (Ind.), Lamar Smith (Tex.) and 20 other neo-conservative congressmen signed onto the Safe and Secure America Act of 2009, which seeks to extend for an additional 10 years provisions that allow federal authorities to conduct warrantless surveillance, to access library patron information and to bypass privacy protections in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.(...)

Plus sur Cantor:


Freeman blâme le Lobby qui n'existe pas

“Modern Militia Movement” Report Written with ADL Assistance

Les drones israéliens: admirez le futur

Il faut bannir la "guerre dans l'espace!"

Ne soyons pas surpris si nos classes dirigeantes utilisent ces drones contre des populations occidentales d'ici quelques années, comme le fichage biométrique, les checkpoints anti-terroristes aux aéroports... Voyez ce que subissent les Palestiniens aujourd'hui: c'est ce qui nous attend dans une avenir rapproché!

VIDEO - Cut to pieces: the Palestinian family

drinking tea in their courtyard

Israeli unmanned aerial vehicles – the dreaded drones –

caused at least 48 deaths in Gaza during the 23-day offensive


News: Israël Drones : l'invention des avions sans pilote en Israël
Par David Rosenfeld
4 mars 2007
L’avion sans pilote – autrement dénommé « drone » ou UAV (Unmanned Air Vehicle) – trouve son origine parmi les étoiles. Il fût en effet inventé en 1935 par la star hollywoodienne Reginald DENNY, un passionné d’aviation qui fonda la compagnie RadioPlane, plus tard acquise par Northrop Grumman.
A l’époque les entraînements militaires aériens prenaient pour cible des modèles réduits attachés à la queue d’un avion porteur, un peu comme nos avions planeurs. Les risques étaient évidemment très élevés pour l’avion porteur, et Reginal DENNY eu l’idée d’un avion dirigé à distance par radio, d’où le nom « radioplane ». 15,000 unités furent construites durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Une autre star hollywoodienne travailla sur ces premiers drones puisque l’on retrouve sur les chaînes de montage de l’usine de Burbank, en Californie, la jeune … Marylin Monroe qui bénéficia de la célébrité de son directeur.
Les Israéliens furent les premiers à imaginer des drones « actifs », dans le sens où ils ne sont plus des avions cibles ou des avions “programmés”, mais de véritables avions pilotés à distance et en temps réel. Ces avions se sont avérés être de réels atouts sur le champ de bataille.
La guerre de Kippour s’était révélée plus périlleuse que la guerre de 1967, et les SAMs soviétiques représentaient une menace grandissante pour laquelle il fallait trouver un système de renseignement en temps réel, sans mettre en danger les pilotes. Un israélien, d’origine américaine, Alvin Ellis, fraîchement embauché par Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) commença à étudier un concept « d’espion du ciel » capable de transmettre des données topographiques et stratégiques des positions ennemies. Un premier prototype muni d’une caméra vola en 1974 sans convaincre la direction d’IAI.
Alvin Ellis se tourna vers Tadiran, et en 1975 naquit le Mastiff, avion espion de surveillance des champs de bataille. Seuls deux appareils furent commandés. Ce ne fût qu’en 1977 que l’armée de l’air israélienne reconnût l’intérêt stratégique de ces systèmes d’un nouveau genre et débuta le développement du système SCOUT aux IAI. Et c’est en 1982, au cours de la guerre “Paix en Galilée” que les avions sans pilote entrèrent dans la légende. Durant l’offensive dans le Sud Liban, la flotte de Mastiff et de Scout permit de repérer et détruire la totalité des 28 sites de missiles SAMs syriens.
Les retombées stratégiques et commerciales furent immédiates. Les américains, en tête, commencèrent une coopération avec la filiale commune d’IAI et Tadiran « Malat ». Ils s’équipèrent du système PIONNER et plus tard du système HUNTER utilisés dans de nombreuses campagnes militaires comme en Irak, au Kosovo, en Serbie, en Libye ou en Afghanistan.
Depuis, tout un éventail d’applications a vu le jour dans le domaine de la défense : drones espion, bombardier, mouche, leurre, ciblage, radar, transmission, cartographie, etc. La dernière révolution en terme de drones militaires consiste en avions d’attaque sans pilote ou UCAV. Ceux-ci disposent d’avantages cruciaux : inhabités, ils peuvent être pilotés 20 heures durant par plusieurs télé-équipages, sans connaître la fatigue. Ils sont aussi plus résistants aux chocs, aux accélérations et aux conditions météorologiques.
Ces avancées militaires ont naturellement permis de générer de nouveaux concepts civils. Israël a lancé de nombreuses initiatives comme la surveillance du trafic routier et des frontières, la météo, la lutte contre les incendies de forêts ou les réseaux de transmission téléphoniques. Des partenariats ont été signés notamment avec la France, les Etats-Unis, la Belgique, la Suisse, la Finlande … Israël compte à ce jour le plus long log d’activité pour ses avions sans pilote.-


Micro-robots volants israéliens

L'IDF utilisera des robots contre les Palestiniens

Pentagon exploring robot killers that can fire on their own

Accord de sécurité Canada-Israel

Coopération franco-israéliennne en matière de recherche-développement militaire

France Israel drones - Coopération sérieuse entre Thales et Elbit

IAI, DASSAULT et THALES - Charles Edelstenne et Denis Ranque : OUI, pour une coopération avec ISRAEL.

THALES et ELBIT Systems - Le drone Watchkeeper testé en Israël en présence de Français et de Britanniques

Star Wars returns, pt.1

STAR WARS en Irak: Lasers en Irak

Real-Life Star Wars: The Militarization of Space

'Heat wave' gun may be used in Iraq

Mieux que le taser: les micro-ondes - Active Denial System

Enron aussi?


Qui l'eût cru? Ils sont aussi derrière le scandale de la compagnie Enron, dont les proprios étaient la famille Belfer, des "survivants de l'Holocauste".

Le problème c'est pas juste que les médias n'en ont pas parlé du tout...

Le problème c'est qu'ils ont même pas été inculpés alors qu'ils ont été les premiers à en bénéficier!

Jews were deeply involved in the Enron scandal but were able to utilize the Jewish medias influence and access to the American mind in such a way as to nearly eliminate their role. The primary witness to turn states evidence against Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling was Andy Fastow (jewish) who worked closely with the largest holders of Enron stock, the Belfer family (jewish "holocaust survivors"). For more information on these facts, see Michael Collins Piper’s excellent book, The New Jerusalem. (source: Curt Maynard)

Belfer est dans la liste des membres du CFR:

Belfer, Robert A. - former Chairman and CEO of Belco Oil & Gas Corp.; former Enron director

Lettre ouverte de Curt Maynard à ceux qui ont été jugés coupables:

Open Letter to Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling

How does it feel? How does it feel to have your life turned upside down, to have the most precious commodity of all--your freedom--taken away? How does it feel to be hated? Without the slightest hesitation, you stole from my father and, therefore, my children and I; you took away a considerable amount of his security in his old age. You deceived him; you left him holding the bag. The funny thing is you did everything you possibly could have done to avoid the trials outcome: You bankrolled the Houston holocaust museum, Lay; your wife even .served on the museum’s Board of Directors. Both of you served as front men for the Jewish Belfer family--the real beneficiaries of the Enron collapse, whose patriarch Arthur Belfer allegedly survived the holocaust. What little regard they have for you now – you served your role as their Shabbas Goy – now, go away quietly.

Most Americans haven’t even heard of the Belfer family. The Jewish media has been absolutely focused on you two from the very beginning: Kenneth Lay this, and Jeffrey Skilling that. You sat back confident that your benefactors would pave the way for an acquittal. Well, surprise! They never intended that you be saved at the last minute. A scapegoat was needed, and you two fools filled the role nicely.
Full story (Politically Correct Apostate)

Et à propos de la campagne de haine contre les auteurs de The Israel Lobby John Mearsheimer & Stephen Walt:

Représailles du lobby israélien, par Justin Raimondo
(...)Comme l'indique le New York Sun (via le Harvard Crimson (ndt : journal de la Kennedy School) :

"Le journal d'hier du New York Sun signalait qu'un 'observateur' familier d'Harvard avait révélé que l'université avait reçu des appels de 'donateurs pro-israéliens' préoccupés par l'article de la KSG.

Un des appels, a indiqué la source au Sun, venait de Robert Belfer, un ancien directeur d'Enron qui avait accordé un professorat à Walt quand il a fait une donation de 7,5 millions de dollars au Centre des Sciences et des Affaires Internationales de la Kennedy School en 1997.

"Bob Belfer a appelé pour exprimer ses profondes inquiétudes et a demandé que Stephen n'utilise plus son titre de professeur dans toute publicité liée à l'article," a indiqué la source au Sun. source

HAARETZ- [After a great deal of fuss and pressure…] “An Israeli official ..was able to confirm [that] Harvard’s Kennedy School decided to remove its logo from this paper, [with a] disclaimer warning readers that the views conveyed in the paper are of the authors alone. “Congressman Eliot Engel calling the authors “dishonest so-called intellectuals” and saying they are “entitled to their stupidity… the right of the rest of us to expose them for the anti-Semites they are.” It also reported this interesting nugget - … “Harvard, had received ’several calls’ from ‘pro-Israel donors’ expressing concern about the Walt-Mearsheimer paper. One of the angered contributors is said to be the donor who underwrote the chair occupied by Dean Walt, Robert Belfer. ” (Haaretz)

The New Jerusalem

Michael Collins Piper

Chapter Three


Although the collapse of oil industry giant Enron
emerged as perhaps the 21 st century’s first major
financial and political scandal—with multiple connections
to both the Democratic and Republican Parties—the
very central (and pivotal) Jewish connection to the Enron
affair has gone largely unnoticed. As we shall see, there
are some quite interesting aspects about the scandal that
have been kept out of the public arena. And in this
regard, the Enron scandal is very much an appropriate
introduction to our overall examination of Zionist power
in America.

Although the fact that Enron executive Andrew
Fastow—who was convicted, along with his wife, for his
misdeeds—was Jewish was mentioned in some media
(with Fastow’s rabbi coming to his public defense) the
much bigger and more explosive Jewish connections
surrounding Enron were almost uniformly covered up.

The Jewish role in Enron is indubitably illustrative of
how the major media suppresses “the Jewish connection”
in major affairs of this type and is worth reviewing here
in our study of Jewish power in America.

The fact that some distinguished Jewish institutions
(and not just big name politicians of both parties) were
on the receiving end of Enron’s “dirty money” was lost
in the shuffle. Here’s a story (a revealing one) you
won’t read anywhere else.

While “everyone knows” that the now-infamous
Enron Corporation was lining the campaign coffers of
Democratic and Republican politicians alike, what was
not reported in the major media is that the corruption-
racked corporation and those behind it have also been
major financial backers of the burgeoning Holocaust
industry (and the Israeli lobby) in the United States and
in Israel.

That’s right. While Kenneth Lay, the non-Jewish
chairman of the Enron Corporation, was busy struggling
to keep his employees (and investors) from finding out
about the sorry state of the giant enterprise, Lay and
his wife Linda (along with Enron itself) were
bankrolling a so-called “Holocaust museum” in
Houston, Texas.

In fact, according to the Jan. 18, 2002 issue of
Forward, one of the most authoritative and respected
Jewish newspapers in America, the Lays and Enron
“donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Houston’s
Holocaust museum, accounting for approximately 10%
of the institution’s $3 million budget”.

The truth is that Kenneth and Linda Lay were so
enmeshed with the museum that they were scheduled
to serve as honorary co-chairs at the museum’s annual
dinner in March of 2002. Mrs. Lay was actually a
member of the museum’s board.

For its own part, the crowd at the museum
protested that they knew nothing about Enron’s
business dealings, which is probably true, but the
question remains as to whether angry Enron investors
and employees will start demanding that the museum
return the “dirty money” siphoned off through
contributions from Enron. But the Enron connection
to the Holocaust industry is even bigger and much
higher reaching than this.

While the media still portrays Enron as some sort
of “Texas cowboy” enterprise, the truth is that a little-
known, but extraordinarily wealthy, billionaire Jewish
family based in New York were major figures behind
Enron and also prime financial backers behind activities
at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.

Although Enron’s chairman, Kenneth Lay, has
been the focus of the media spotlight, evidence
demonstrates that Enron is largely the fiefdom of the
heirs of the late Arthur Belfer, a Polish-born immigrant
often described as a “Holocaust survivor”, despite the
fact that Belfer left Poland in 1939. Belfer started out
as a pillow importer, then began dealing in lucrative
contracts for sleeping bags supplied to the U.S. armed
forces. He then branched out into the oil business and
established Belco Petroleum as one of the largest
industrial companies in the nation.

Critics of media coverage of Enron have noted
that although articles buried in the Dec. 5, 2001
business sections of both The Wall Street Journal and
the New York Times outlined the Belfer connection to
Enron, subsequently the Belfer name has been
relegated to the background, with functionary Kenneth
Lay—essentially a “hired gun” for the Belfer family—
being the scapegoat in the Enron disaster.

While the Belfer name was never mentioned once
in a major Newsweek story purporting to tell the whole
tragic Enron story, it just so happens that Belfer’s
heirs were (at the time the scandal erupted) major
stakeholders in Enron, dating back to the 1983 sale by
Arthur Belfer of his Belco Petroleum Corp. to Enron’s

Although Belfer died in 1993, the Belfer family’s
foundation (enriched by the company’s now-
controversial Enron holdings) has been funding a
regularly convened “Arthur and Rochelle Belfer
National Conference for Educators” held with much
fanfare at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in
Washington, D.C.

Two such conferences were slated for 2002.
Middle- and high-school teachers from across the
country who specialize in “Holocaust education” are
brought by the Belfer endowment to the museum in
Washington where they are trained in the process of
indoctrinating school students in the lore and legend of
“the Holocaust”.

What cannot be denied—despite the media’s
decision to sweep the Belfer name under the rug—is
that the names “Enron” and “Belfer” are practically

No “disinterested party” by any means, Arthur
Belfer’s son, Robert Belfer, served on Enron’s board
of directors but also, more notably, on its three-man
executive committee, along with Lay. While the media
has cast Robert Belfer off to the sidelines, it is beyond
reason to suggest that he had no knowledge of the
company’s sorry state of affairs.

The public record shows that Belfer money has
also been widely distributed to Jewish causes in the
United States and Israel. Robert Belfer was recently
elected chair of the board of overseers of the Albert
Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University in
New York of which he and his wife Renee have long
been financial benefactors. Belfer also serves on the
board of the Israeli-based Weizmann Institute of
Science (a driving force behind Israel’s secret nuclear
weapons development program) and of the American
Jewish Committee, one of the most influential power
blocs in the Israeli lobby in America.

Mrs. Belfer is also a trustee of the American
Friends of the Israel Museum. The Belfers’ money
giving reaches far and wide: they are also contributors
to Thanks to Scandinavia, a venture that honors
Scandinavians who fought against the Axis powers
during World War II.

Some have suggested that because of the intimate
ties of the Belfer/Enron empire to the Holocaust
industry and the Israeli lobby the major media has
made a conscious decision to effectively “divorce” the
Belfer name from the Enron scandal in order to spare
the distinguished Holocaust industry and the Israeli
lobby any embarrassment.

While it appears that Belfer and his family have
suffered major losses in the Enron debacle, The Wall
Street Journal assured its readers that the family “hasn’t
been wiped out financially”. Selma Ruben, Belfer’s
sister, is married to Lawrence Ruben, an immensely
wealthy New York real estate developer. Another sister,
Anita, recently died. Her heirs are reported to have lost
vast sums of money in the Enron affair.

So while the major media is hyping the entirely
irrelevant question as to whether Republican politicians
or Democratic politicians (or both) are somehow
responsible for the collapse of Enron, the Belfer family
(and those in the Holocaust industry and Israel-related
causes who have thrived on Enron’s largess) are
escaping the focus of public attention.

Considering the connections of Enron, it may thus
be no coincidence that two of the primary
congressional figures who are being touted by the
media as “investigators” of Enron are Rep. Henry
Waxman (D-Calif.) and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-
Conn.), two lawmakers known as strong supporters of
Israel’s cause.

Thus, from this brief overview of the now-
infamous Enron scandal, which has been the subject of
massive media coverage, we see that there has indeed
been a hidden “Jewish connection” that has been
ignored in the major broadcast and published media in
this country.

The final results of the Enron affair are yet to be
seen, of course, but the very fact that there has been
this little-known Jewish connection that has been
ignored or deliberately suppressed is a very telling
indicator that Zionist power in America is so immense
that such a Jewish connection remains under wraps.

In his previously mentioned book, The Fatal
Embrace, Jewish American Professor Benjamin
Ginsberg wrote candidly and forthrightly about the
frequency with which one has found a “Jewish
connection” in a number of major American political
scandals, ranging from the legendary Credit Mobilier
affair of the 19 th century to the geopolitical and
financial intrigues surrounding the construction of the
Panama Canal—not to mention a host of other such
events that have become part of American history.

And all of this is not to disregard the very
definitive role that Jewish families in the United
States—and worldwide—played in the massive trans-
Atlantic trade in African slaves, a point widely disputed
by Jewish organizations and the mass media but
thoroughly documented, beyond any question, in the
landmark work, The Secret Relationship Between
Blacks and Jews, issued by Minister Louis
Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam.
Of course, while the word “scandal” is not
generally applied, although it should be, there is also no
question that Zionist influence played a substantial role
in the promotion of the outrageous lies told by the
administration of George W. Bush in promoting the
American invasion of Iraq in the spring of 2003, on the
very eve of the Jewish holiday of Purim, at which time
the Jews celebrate the destruction of their enemies, a
most unpleasant type of celebration by any normal
Nonetheless, the patently false claims about
entirely non-existent weapons of mass destruction
made by Young Bush and his Jewish advisors, such as
Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith and Richard Perle—and
promoted in the media by such Zionist hardliners as
William Kristol—were a blatant fraud on the
American people (and the world).
Yet, it is highly unlikely that these guilty parties—
Zionists all, Jewish-and non-Jewish alike—will ever be
brought before a tribunal and prosecuted for these
very real war crimes.
And that is the sad reality of what happens when
Zionist power has become so immense that the
interests of the Zionist movement are thoroughly co-
mingled with the affairs of a nation, resulting in a
high-handed and quite blatant institutional corruption—
and a prevailing lack of moral principle—that governs
in high places today. The fact is that there are few—
if any—limits on Zionist power in America.
While there are no laws demanding the prosecution
and punishment of public officials who tell lies when
they are not under oath (which is, unfortunately, most
of the time), perhaps there should be. The bottom line
is that Zionism has played a major part in some of the
most outrageous—and profitable—rackets of our day.
However, another scandal of recent American
history, one certainly worth reviewing, provides a bleak
demonstration, in the most specific sense, of how
Zionist power has infiltrated and manipulated the
highest ranks of our nation’s law enforcement: the
U.S. Justice Department and the federal court system.
This is the INSLAW affair, the next topic of
examination in our review of Zionist power in America.

The New Jerusalem : chapter 1

Qui sont les artisans du désastre financier?