- Les rebelles ou Assad? Même les USA ne peuvent conclure avec certitude qui est responsable des attaques et hésitent à intervenir...
- Les attaques ne profitent qu'aux rebelles et à ceux qui, comme Israël, réclament à grands cris une guerre contre la Syrie...
- L'ancien chef de cabinet de Colin Powell sous l'administration Bush, le colonel à la retraite Lawrence Wilkerson avait sonné l'alarme en mai dernier qu'Israël pourrait utiliser des armes chimiques en Syrie pour provoquer la guerre qu'ils souhaitent et pousser les nations occidentales à aller combattre à sa place...
- La tête d'Assad mise à prix, des assassins professionnels sur le terrain...
- Le gouvernement d'Assad est laïque (impossible donc de les faire passer pour de vilains islamistes), proche de la Russie et de l'Iran: autant de raisons pour Israël de rayer la Syrie de la carte.
- Les lobby juifs fauteurs de guerre pour Israël ont tellement peur d'être reconnus pour ce qu'ils sont qu'ils font en sorte que les médias camouflent leur travail de fauteurs de guerres pour Israël... Comme ils ont travaillé à camoufler dans les médias leurs efforts de fauteurs de guerre contre l'Iran.
- La Syrie s'est procuré un arsenal chimique précisément parce qu'elle savait qu'Israël a l'arsenal nucléaire! Personne ne mentionne que la Syrie a souvent appelé à la création du "Moyen-Orient sans arme nucléaire", justement parce que cela mettrait de la pression sur Israël.
VIDEO - BHL SUR RMC : «NE PAS INTERVENIR EN SYRIE SERAIT UNE HONTE» 29/08
VIDEO - BHL : histoire d'un vampire des carpettes qui aimerait bien que le sang coule en Syrie
VIDEO - BHL : histoire d'un vampire des carpettes qui aimerait bien que le sang coule en Syrie
AUDIO - American Free Press Editors Roundtable Aug. 28, 2013 AMERICAN FREE PRESS newspapers editors and reporters discuss the weeks top stories. Michael Collins Piper discusses his latest article on Syria being framed.
AUDIO - AMERICAN FREE PRESS Editors Roundtable, Sep. 12, 2013 AMERICAN FREE PRESS newspapers editors and reporters discuss the weeks top stories. Michael Collins Piper discusses his latest article on Syria being framed.
• ‘No smoking gun’ evidence that Syria used chemical weapons
• Israel the source for current charges of sarin gas use by Assad
• Israel the source for current charges of sarin gas use by Assad
By Michael Collins Piper
Issue 36, September 9, 2013
One
of America’s most respected military figures charged publicly that
long-standing allegations about the Syrian government’s use of chemical
weapons may have been, in his words, “an Israeli false flag operation”
calculated to stir up opposition to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad,
long perceived by Israel as a threat to its geopolitical agenda.
And
now that the United States seems poised to attack Syria on the basis of
new claims about the use of such weapons, what former Army Col. Lawrence
Wilkerson told Current TV on May 3 bears noting.
A longtime military
intimate of Gen. Colin Powell, and later his chief of staff when Powell
was secretary of state under “W” Bush, Wilkerson
said his intelligence sources dismissed claims at that time that
Assad’s military had used chemical weapons against terrorist forces.
Having loomed over Assad
for months, that charge has been reinvigorated and the media revels in
the possibility the U.S. will now attack Syria.
However, The Los
Angeles Times reported Aug. 27 that Germany’s Focus magazine—citing a
former Israeli intelligence official—said Israel was the primary source for current charges about Syria’s alleged use of chemical warfare.
Noting
“U.S. intelligence sources long have relied on Israel to help provide
intelligence about Syria” the Times didn’t mention it was also Israel
that previously supplied the Bush administration much of the false data
about supposed weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which provided the
pretext for the invasion of that Arab republic.
The media carefully
suppresses the fact that—as demanded by the Israeli lobby in
Washington—U.S. tax dollars (underwriting Israeli covert expertise)
instigated the rebellion against Assad that led to the civil war that
U.S. blood and treasure are now expected to resolve in a manner
satisfactory to Israel.
Although the media suggests the Pentagon is
eager for war on Syria, the fact is that—just as before the Iraq war
when multiple military leaders werewarning of the dangers of such a
venture—top brass are likewise urging restraint vis-à-vis Syria.
Even
Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey recently told
Congress that U.S. intervention in Syria would not be in America’s
interests.
Yet, despite widespread public opposition to war, many
Republicans and Democrats alike—bankrolled by pro-Israel campaign
contributors—are clamoring for action.
• First real evidence emerges proving U.S. ally behind Syria attack
by Victor Thorn for American Free Press
October 06, 2013 AFP
AMERICAN FREE PRESS is opposed to military interventions and wars that are not in this country’s interest and only benefit the military-industrial-banking complex and Greater Israel.
And with that in mind, this week, AFP examines how doctored intelligence reports, an incoherent foreign policy and powerful special interests have the potential to lead the United States into World War III.
Once restricted merely to conspiracy circles, the term “false flag attack” became part of the popular lexicon during the recent Syrian chemical weapons debacle. Former Representative Ron Paul (R-Tex) referred to allegations that the Syrian government had used sarin gas as a false flag before adding, “The group most likely to benefit from it is al Qaeda.” But even though Muslim revolutionaries were most likely involved in the use of chemical weapons, the source of these heinous attacks can be traced to familiar players.
On September 17, Jason Ditz, news editor of the website “Antiwar.com,” wrote, “Israeli ambassador Michael Oren revealed that the Israeli government has privately been seeking change in neighboring Syria for the past two years since the ongoing civil war began.”
Four months earlier, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s right-hand man during his term in the Bush administration, spoke of an earlier chemical attack in Syria.
“This could have been an Israeli false flag operation,” he said. “You’ve got basically a geo-strategically, geo-political — if you will — inept regime in Tel Aviv right now.” Wilkerson is known for calling intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in October 2005 a “hoax.”
In regard to Syria, respected ex-Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) analyst Ray McGovern averred that so-called evidence presented by the Obama administration “would not stand up in a court of law.” According to McGovern, despite Israel’s attempts at perpetual instability in the Middle East, saner heads prevailed via our military’s top brass.
Scott Baker, senior editor of the liberal website “Op-Ed News,” addressed this issue on September 11. “McGovern says the military got to the president, overriding even the objections of the military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff,” wrote Baker on his website.
On September 2, popular news website “The World Tribune” editorialized about the military’s wise request to slow down the path to war in the form of General Martin Dempsey, who showed his reluctance to be a participant in this potential fiasco.
“Dempsey has been unusually blunt in his remarks with both Obama and Vice President Joe Biden,” opined the “Tribune.” “His assessment is that any U.S. war against Assad will involve his foreign allies, and that means Tehran and to a smaller extent, Moscow.”
Already, comparisons between Obama and President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have been made, particularly in terms of lies and exaggerations regarding weapons of mass destruction.
For example, Secretary of State John Kerry stated that 1,429 people, including 426 children, died in the August 21 chemical attack just outside Damascus. Yet humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders, which has doctors on the ground in Syria, estimated the total at only 355. Red Cross Operations Director George Kettaneh directly contradicted Obama administration claims that a Syrian man had tested positive for traces of toxic gases in his bloodstream.
Yossef Bodansky, the senior editor for Defense & Foreign Affairs magazine, took it a step further in a September 1 article published on the news agency’s website, entitled “Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?”
As former director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, Bodansky’s sources acknowledged that on August 13, at a Turkish military prison in Antakya, representatives from Qatar, Turkey and the U.S.—including U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford—met with Syrian opposition leaders to unleash a “war changing development.”
Saleh Muslim, overseer of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party, agreed with Bodansky’s assessment, asserting that this secret meeting was “aimed at framing Assad and provoking an international reaction.”
Syria opposition leader praises Benjamin Netanyahu ÇA C'EST UN NOUVEAU CLASSIQUE!
Israel Support to Al Qaeda Rebels: New Free Syrian Army (FSA) Commander Trained in Israel
McCain, Graham call for military action on Syria after chemical-weapons evidence
John McCain wants Syria intervention
McCain says it's 'crazy' not to seek regime change in Syria
McCain: ‘Catastrophic’ if Congress overrules Obama on Syria
McCain says Israel ‘shaken’ by US dallying
CONFIRMED McCain Posed with Known Terrorists in Syria
McCain calls for strict timeline for Syria chemical weapons handover
McCain: Add monitors to Syria military intervention resolution
John McCain: John Kerry ‘unbelievably unhelpful’
Sen. John McCain: Syrian rebels will ‘feel abandoned’
McCain pense à ses pauvres petits protégés abandonnés... Pourquoi ne dit-il pas
que si on les contrarie, ils pourraient essayer de "se venger en Europe en faisant péter des bombes sales"?
OFFICIAL ARIZONA GOP BODY PASSES FORMAL REBUKE OF JOHN MCCAIN
US Senators McCain, Graham: Cannot imagine worse signal to send to Iran
Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham slam agreement preventing WWIII
John McCain To Attack Vladimir Putin In the Pages of Pravda!
Kerry says Syrian strike 'still an option' as Israel awaits 'results, not words' from Russia-US chem deal
'Expert' US analyst on Syria cited by McCain and Kerry fired for being a complete fraud
WSJ PRO WAR op-ed writer Elizabeth O’Bagy fired for resume lie
How to Start a War
The woman whose Wall Street Journal article
was cited by Secretary of State John Kerry and Sen. John McCain
(R-Ariz.) during congressional hearings about Syria and the prospects
for a U.S. attack was recently fired from her job at the Institute for
the Study of War for lying about having a Ph.D. from Georgetown,
reported Politico. In her article, researcher Elizabeth O’Bagy made the
case for attacking the Syrian government, because she alleged it had
committed atrocities against its own people. According to Politico, Ms.
O’Bagy has also failed to disclose her connections to the Syrian
Emergency Task Force, a pro-rebel advocacy group. (American Free Press, Sept 17, 2013)
‘McCainiacs’ Border on Treason
In an interviewwith online news outlet Real News Network, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, said Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (RS. C.) “are bordering on being traitors in my view, because they won’t let this president [Obama] have room to achieve a diplomatic solution [with Iran].” He added: “They’re all angry nowthat [Obama] didn’t bomb Syria . . . and so they’removing on to Iran, with Graham even saying he’s going to move for legislation to authorize the use of military force against Iran in the next four to five months.” (American Free Press, Oct 7, 2013)
In an interviewwith online news outlet Real News Network, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, said Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (RS. C.) “are bordering on being traitors in my view, because they won’t let this president [Obama] have room to achieve a diplomatic solution [with Iran].” He added: “They’re all angry nowthat [Obama] didn’t bomb Syria . . . and so they’removing on to Iran, with Graham even saying he’s going to move for legislation to authorize the use of military force against Iran in the next four to five months.” (American Free Press, Oct 7, 2013)
Sen. John McCain: I'm "very sad" over U.N. resolution on Syrian weapons
Syria researcher dismissed for falsifying credentials hired by Senator McCain
McCain Hires Disgraced Syria ‘Expert’ Elizabeth O’Bagy
Bibi Netanyahou et John "Bomb-bomb-Iran" McCain
Former CIA Analyst Exposes Jewish Supremacist Syrian War Lobbyists
Historian and former CIA Intelligence Officer and analyst
Michael Scheuer has openly identified the Jewish...
Mars 2014:
John McCain Thanks AIPAC for Supporting Military Intervention in Syria
Assad aide: Israel sent undercover troops to Syria
Septembre 2013:
Lobbying affiché des groupes juifs pour une guerre en Syrie: les juifs ont peur que ça leur retombe sur le nez.
AIPAC: Stop Lobbying for a US-Syria Attack!
Le discours de l'Aipac sur la Syrie n'aide pas Israel
Apparemment: ils ont même décidé de tout arrêter... en apparence en tout cas:
With deal struck, pro-Israel groups suspend lobbying for Syria strikePro-Israel groups embrace a U.S.-Russia deal on Syria after a launching a full-throttled lobbying push for a military strike.
Août 2013:
JTA - Initial reluctance gone, AIPAC makes big push on Syria response
Any reluctance Jewish groups initially had, it has evaporated after White House advisors consulted with Jewish leaders on the legislation proposal.
JPOST- Pro-Israel groups in United States scramble to save Syria strike resolution
1 000 rabbins posent la question à Obama: peut-on compter sur vous pour agir en Syrie?
White House to Congress: ‘Help protect Israel with attack on Syria’
The “Secret Jew”: Warmonger John Kerry’s “Hidden” Jewishness
Was Kerry’s ‘Munich moment’ on Syria created by a protégé of the Israel lobby?
Senior GOP Senators: We Won’t Support Military Strikes Without ‘Overall Strategy’ To Remove Assad
Israel Ynetnews: Obama blinked first Analysis: Decision to delay strike against Syria sends dangerous message to cruel regimes, terrorists everywhere
Jewish Press Unleash Hatred against Britain The Jewish Times of Israel editor, veteran Zionist Supremacist and agent David Horovitz, has shown the...
Jewish Press Unleash Hatred against Britain The Jewish Times of Israel editor, veteran Zionist Supremacist and agent David Horovitz, has shown the...
Britain’s ‘isolationism’ is not good for Israel
Canada plans to invade Syria
1 septembre 2013
HORREUR OBAMA
Gens détestant le nègre sont nombreux
depuis qu’il envahit la France, conformément au souhait des sages de
Sion, avec soutien outrancier de Veuve irrégulière. Presse juive est la
plus forte dans ce domaine, à commencer par Libération qui publia hier en couverture cette photo du singe métamorphosé en homme Obama, car il ne voulait pas exploser Syrie.
Voyez le truc, Obama était chic type quand il fut élu grâce au soutien de Tikkun. Il devient laid et bestial maintenant qu’il hésite à déclencher guerre absurde dans l’intérêt de Yisraêl. (lire le reste...)
Obama's critics in Israel should ask themselves: Why hasn't Netanyahu acted yet on Syria?
Israeli leaders on the right denounce the world for not stopping Assad; let’s stop suggesting that others step into the line of fire...
Selling War: White House Says Attack Will ‘Protect Israel’
VIDEO - FLASHBACK: Roland Dumas: " La guerre en Syrie, c'est pour Israël "
FLASHBACK: Roland Dumas: "Israël contrôle la France, elle se trompe à l’égard d’Assad"
VIDEO - Mark Glenn on Press TV: "Israel is the one pushing for war with Syria"
Polls: Israelis want US, Europe to attack Syria, but against IDF intervention
Obama under Zionist pressure to retaliate against Syria
Fanatic Zionists Seek to Spark New Middle East War
Netanyahu: Syria chemical weapons must stop; French FM: Strong reaction needed
Netanyahu: On Syria, Israel’s finger on pulse and trigger
Syria, Iran issue first explicit warning to Israel if US attacks
Syrian rebel leader asks Israel, US for help
Israel deploys missile system near border with Syria
Israel to U.S.: Respond to Syria
Prominent Israeli Cabinet ministers are calling for a U.S.-led
response to a what appears to have been a chemical attack in Syria last
week that the prime minister describes as a “terrible crime.”
Benjamin Netanyahu told his Cabinet on Sunday that “this situation cannot continue.”
Israel expects U.S. strike on Syria after alleged chemical weapons use
Israelis question U.S. commitment in Syria
Netanyahu: ‘Low probability’ Israel will be drawn into Syria fighting
Le rôle d’Israël dans l’annonce de l’attaque contre la Syrie
Le président israélien "certain" que les Etats-Unis vont frapper la Syrie
Israel estimates: High likelihood of US attack in Syria
The Next Big Lie and the Next War: This Time Syria!
The Neocon March on Damascus
PNAC members all too similar to the 66 "experts" pressuring Obama into Syria
Jewish Press Confirms that Zionist Supremacists are Behind War Propaganda
[Jewish Neocon PNAC King] Kristol : Is President Obama going wobbly on Syria?
Naming the 800 pound gorilla behind the drive to war with Syria
Kerry heading to Israel to update Netanyahu on Syria deal
Pro-Israel, warmongering Zionist Jew Sen. Carl Levin– ‘Public opinion can’t guide decision on striking Syria’s Assad’
TUT’s Mark Dankof’s response to Sen. Carl Levin regarding Syria
Reid compares Assad’s attacks to Nazi gas chambers Senate majority leader tries to drum up support in Congress for American military actions against Syria
Assad says US must stop military threats, and Israel must sign WMD treaties
Israel's Chemical Weapons Stockpile Highlights Western Hypocrisy
'Expert' US analyst on Syria cited by McCain and Kerry fired for being a complete fraud
How to Start a War
The woman whose Wall Street Journal article was cited by
Secretary of State John Kerry and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) during
congressional hearings about Syria and the prospects for a U.S. attack
was recently fired from her job at the Institute for the Study of War
for lying about having a Ph.D. from Georgetown, reported Politico. In
her article, researcher Elizabeth O’Bagy made the case
for attacking the Syrian government, because she alleged it had committed atrocities against its own people. According to Politico, Ms. O’Bagy has also failed to disclose her connections to the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a pro-rebel advocacy group.
for attacking the Syrian government, because she alleged it had committed atrocities against its own people. According to Politico, Ms. O’Bagy has also failed to disclose her connections to the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a pro-rebel advocacy group.
Commit a War Crime to Cover Up a War Crime? Phoney Syria Poison Gas Story Planted By Mossad in the Western Media
Top Israeli Intelligence Chief Confirms Israeli Interest in Toppling Syrian Government
Lies upon Lies: US “Evidence” for “Chemical Attack” based upon “Israeli Intercept”
Mossad Spying Activities Casts New Doubts over Israeli “Evidence”
LOL!!!–Israeli intelligence ‘backs reports’ of latest chemical weapons attack in Syria
"One crucial piece of the emerging case came from Israeli spy services, which provided the Central Intelligence Agency with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit that oversees Mr. Assad’s chemical weapons, Arab diplomats said."
Israeli intelligence seen as ‘central’ to US case against Syria
Israeli Minister Says Syria Used Chemical Weapons
VIDEO - Thierry Meyssan: Israël est derrière l'opération de propagande belliciste contre la Syrie (Pourquoi, ailleurs Meyssan insistait que les USA, l'Angleterre et Israël sont une seule et même entité...)
WELL KNOWN JEWISH WRITERS WHO SAY USA FIGHTS WARS FOR ISRAEL
Video - Accusations d'usage d'armes chimiques La Syrie dénonce l'influence d'Israël sur les États-Unis
U.S. says unable to conclusively determine chemical weapons used in Syria
Syrian rebels use toxic chemicals against govt troops near Damascus - state media
Syria Presents More Evidence on Mercenaries Use of Chemical Weapons
Syrian soldiers locate chemical agents in rebel tunnels near Damascus
'Syrian troops find chemicals in rebel tunnels'
Syrian army finds chemical agents in tunnels used by 'rebels' as U.S. navy expands presence in Middle East
Syria lets UN inspect chemical attack site, Washington says too late
Syrie : les attaques chimiques ont été perpétrées par les rebelles
"Doctors" Behind Syrian Chemical Weapons Claims are Aiding Terrorists
VIDEO - Syria rebels’ chemical lab uncovered near Damascus
La Russie a fourni les images satellites aux Nations-Unies sur les auteurs de l’attaque chimique en Syrie
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich–Chemical Missile Launched by Syrian Rebels
Evidence Indicates that Syrian Government Did Not Launch a Chemical Weapon Attack Against Its People
VIDEO - Attaque chimique en Syrie : les doutes d'un expert
VIDEO - LOL!!! US says Syrian rebels ‘incapable’ of chemical attack
OOOPS!–Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack ‘prepared before incident’
New Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Another False Flag?
VIDEO - Syria: "Only Rebels Benefit from Recent Chemical Attack"
VIDEO - Ralph Schoenman: 'Israeli False flag undertakings provide pretext for More Wars'
France: Force is an option in Syria if gas attack confirmed
VIDEO - Syrie : les amis de Laurent Fabius abattent leurs dernières cartes
Moyen-Orient: Netanyahu fait la leçon à Fabius
Israel and the US want Russia outside Middle East
Netanyahu: Syria is Iran’s ‘testing ground’
Attaquer la Syrie signerait la fin d'Israël, dit un officier iranien
Liban/Syrie : Le défi de Nasrallah à la guerre israélo-saoudienne !
President al-Assad: “Syria will Never become a Western Puppet State”
U.S. military officers have deep doubts about impact, wisdom of a U.S. strike on Syria
General Dempsey: Syria rebels wouldn’t support U.S. interests if they seized power
Syrie : les amis de Laurent Fabius abattent leurs dernières cartes : assassinat ciblé ou gazage de masse
Israelis Flying Aid to Syrian Rebels Under the Cover of Humanitarianism
Des rebelles syriens ont l'intention d’effectuer une attaque chimique contre Israël pour piéger Assad
False Flag Involving Israel to Implicate Syria in the Works Says RT
New Syria “CW Initiative”: But What About Israel’s Stockpile?
Israel adamant it won't ratify chemical arms treaty before hostile neighbors Talk of deal to eliminate Syria’s stockpiles of chemical weapons sends jitters through Jerusalem; will Israel be next?
Israel’s chemical weapons under the spotlight
Report: CIA believes Israel acquired chemical weapons decades ago
False Flag Involving Israel to Implicate Syria in the Works Says RT
Gilad Atzmon à propos de l’AIPAC et du patriotisme
Des rebelles syriens ont l'intention d’effectuer une attaque chimique contre Israël pour piéger Assad
Saudis, Israel Lobbying U.S. for Attack on Syria
Pro-Israel groups in United States scramble to save Syria strike resolution
The Syrian deal - More bad than good for Israel If Assad honors the deal to remove chemical weapons from Syria, then a very deadly weapon will be removed from Israel’s doorstep. The bad news is that Assad would be left standing, leaving Iran with a vital strategic ally.
VIDEO - PRESSTV Mark Glenn: US never intended to attack Syria from the beginning
Major arms shipment reaches Syrian rebels
Syrie : opération de commandos rebelles, israéliens et américains en cours
Syria says it captured Israeli weapons from rebels
Assad hails Syrian ‘unity,’ says Israel benefits from Arab unrest
Médecins sans frontières : une ONG directement impliquée aux côtés des groupes terroristes en Syrie
UN says Syrian child refugees top 1 million mark
Flashback: US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report
Flashback: U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
Flashback: Palestinian injuries suggest Israel is using chemical weapons in Gaza
Voyez:
même nos médias alternatifs adoptent ce point de vue: "si on se lance
dans cette guerre d'Obama, ça va renforcer les méchants islamistes". Moi
je dis: méfiez-vous, car Rand Paul ne dirait certainement pas ça si
c'était pas accepté et toléré par ses maîtres sionistes! Même le débile
animateur radio/télé Rush Limbaugh, une vraie chèvre de Judas qui trompe
les gens de droite
pour le compte d'Israel, dit que Obama complote pour aller en guerre
contre la Syrie, que Obama favorise Al-Qaida en Syrie. (Glenn Beck dit
la même chose,
vérifiez vous-mêmes!) Le piège dans leur discours est
encore une fois qu'il propage l'anti-Islam, ce qui nous ramène
subtilement,
par une voie indirecte, sous la coupe de la propagande sioniste.
Plusieurs à droite
disent (comme les agents sionistes anti-islam) que c'est un complot
musulman qui a mis Obama au pouvoir et qui est en train de subvertir
tous les paliers de gouvernements et même l'armée! Tout ça serait un
grand complot des musulmans, notamment des "Frères musulmans"! Dénoncer
le fait que l'Occident va-t-en-guerre soutient Al-Qaida en Syrie est
toléré par les
sionistes. Moi je dirais que s'ils tolèrent ce discours, c'est parce que
ça peut nuire à Obama en donnant des munitions à ses opposants.
The latest allegations
by the intrepid servants of International Zionism that the Syrian
government launched a “chemical attack” on its own civilians in Damascus
is just more desperate hogwash to justify Western intervention,
terrorism and genocide of the Syrian people. This latest ploy is just
another psychological warfare operation designed to demonize Assad and
provide the West with a pretext to remove him from his rightful place as
the head of the Syrian government. There is absolutely no reason why an
intelligent and decent man like Assad would ever commit such a heinous
act that would essentially hand his enemies the excuse they were looking
for to invade and conquer his nation on a silver platter. This
suggestion is not only idiotic, it is an insult to our intelligence.
All of the evidence shows that the rebel-terrorists
are the ones who are using chemical weapons on civilians in a
propaganda effort to blame these atrocities on the Syrian government.
The rebel-terrorists most likely committed this latest atrocity too,
with the help of their American, British and Israeli sponsors. The
foreign-backed insurgents and terrorists who are tearing Syria apart are
of the same foul, sadistic ilk that dismembered the nation of Libya
several years ago. This madness and chaos is all part of a long-standing Zionist plan
to reconfigure the middle east in the Zionists favour by eliminating
all strong Arab leaders who refuse to submit to Israeli domination of
the entire region and by fragmenting their nations into smaller, weaker
states.
The Syrian Army uncovered a rebel chemical weapons lab in the town of Jobar.
Oded Yinon, a rather puerile Jewish supremacist, authored a strategy paper in 1982 entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s”
in which he laid out the framework of a plan to undermine and weaken
all of the Arab nations surrounding Israel by instigating internal
ethnic and religious conflicts. This is exactly what has transpired
since the Israeli attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
About one hour after the Twin Towers were detonated with Israeli
explosives, the Israeli war criminal Ehud Barak appeared on the BBC in which he listed one by one all of the countries
that have since fallen victim to Western terrorism and aggression.
Barak called for “immediate military action” against all of the States
and resistance groups that pose a threat to Israeli hegemony. In his
traditional manner of unfettered arrogance, Barak attempted to trick the
viewers into believing that these countries were somehow a threat to
the United States.
The Zionist plan for a “Greater Israel.”
It is nothing short of disgusting to see every major Western country
doing the bidding of Zionist imperialism with such ferocious, passionate
enthusiasm. The U.S., England, Germany and France have all threatened
to attack Syria if this chemical weapons charge is “confirmed”. There is
no doubt that these Western schemers will find a way to “confirm”
Assad’s guilt using the usual methods of subterfuge and deception.
The sickening hypocrisy and sensational arrogance of American leaders
regarding “chemical weapons” and the killing of civilians has reached
ludicrous proportions. The United States has bombed and killed more
civilians in the past twenty years than all other nations on earth
combined. The U.S. military sprayed Agent Orange chemicals
all over the place during the Vietnam war; a war that was initiated on
the basis of an incident in the Gulf of Tonkin that never even happened.
The U.S. military has used Depleted Uranium weapons in its genocidal
war against Iraq, causing the cancer rates in certain Iraqi cities to
skyrocket. Many Iraqi children are now being born with terrible birth
defects and unbearable deformities. After the first Gulf War, which was
initiated on the basis of an invented story of pure propaganda
now known as the “Kuwaiti Incubator Baby Hoax,” the U.S. government
imposed brutal sanctions on Iraq which caused the deaths of over 500,000
Iraqi children. Lest we forget, the United States dropped two nuclear
bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second
World War, incinerating hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese
civilians in a matter of seconds.
The United States supports Israel, a nation that was established
through terrorism and ethnic cleansing; a nation which not only
possesses some of the most deadly and dangerous chemical weapons and
biological agents of destruction, but has used white phosphorous chemical bombs
on Palestinian civilians. There were of course no Western government
leaders condemning these crimes when they were happening. In fact, for
the most part Western leaders supported these actions, defending the
Israeli murderers with incorrigible conviction.
The inescapable conclusion of all of this is that our world is being
run by psychopaths who may very well cause the extinction of the human
species and the end of all life on earth as we know it.
Zander Fuerza
Monday,
February 17, 2003 Adar1 15, 5763
U.S. official to Israel: We'll deal with Syria, Iran after Iraq war
By Aluf Benn and Sharon Sadeh, Haaretz
By Aluf Benn and Sharon Sadeh, Haaretz
U.S. Undersec'y of State John Bolton
Syria and Iran are next. (Photo: AP)
VIDEO - Syria and the Greater Israel Project
VIDEO - NATO's Plan to Divide the Middle East, Oded Yonin, Bernard Lewis
“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
Yinon’s Revenge? A Panorama of Chaos in the Arab World
The Crises in Syria, Lebanon and Egypt: The Plan to ‘Divide and Conquer’ the Middle East and Why All Roads Lead to Tehran
Israel’s Long-time Strategy to Destabilize the Middle East
VIDEO - BHL essaie de convaincre les américains
VIDEO - L'AIPAC, lobby pro israélien aux USA, appelle à la guerre à la SYRIE
VIDEO - NATO's Plan to Divide the Middle East, Oded Yonin, Bernard Lewis
“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
Yinon’s Revenge? A Panorama of Chaos in the Arab World
The Crises in Syria, Lebanon and Egypt: The Plan to ‘Divide and Conquer’ the Middle East and Why All Roads Lead to Tehran
Israel’s Long-time Strategy to Destabilize the Middle East
VIDEO - BHL essaie de convaincre les américains
VIDEO - L'AIPAC, lobby pro israélien aux USA, appelle à la guerre à la SYRIE
Fri, 08/23/2013 - 20:01
Jobbik has always spoken out against the use of weapons banned by international law, therefore, if it is proven that such a case has indeed taken place, our party objects to the use of poison gas in Syria as well.
However, Jobbik is worried to see the
sinister events developing in Syria as well as the systematic attempts
of the West to find a casus belli
for an armed intervention against the Assad government. Jobbik disowns
the provocation as well as the anti-Assad stance of the West and the
servile attitude of the Hungarian government that runs to rally behind
its Western allies. Jobbik also objects to the support provided for the
forces being organized against the Assad government which also represent
Islam's most extreme platforms, Wahhabism and Salafism and openly
cooperate with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organisations. Not only does
the West contradict itself by supporting terrorism, but subordinates
the already fragile stability of tension-ridden Middle East to its own
short-term goals.
Jobbik firmly believes that the UN
Security Council, which represents the interests of the powers that view
the Syrian conflict subjectively and in light of their own goals, is
unable to conduct a fair investigation of the gas attack. This has
already been proven ten years ago, in the case of the shameful Iraqi
invasion that was built on a smear campaign and propaganda.
Jobbik stands for the Assad government,
which enjoys the support of the overwhelming majority of the Syrian
people and has built up an economically, culturally and politically
stable country during its rule of over half a century in one of the most
complex Middle Eastern countries in terms of ethnicity and religion. We
hope that the Assad government will soon be able to stabilize the
situation and continue its governmental activity in the interest of the
Syrian people.
Márton Gyöngyösi, deputy leader of Jobbik's Parliamentary Group
Les groupes juifs fauteurs de guerres pour Israël ont peur
d'être reconnus pour ce qu'ils sont: des fauteurs de guerre pour
Israël!
NYT excises AIPAC from Let’s Attack Syria story
September 2, 2013Passage removed, H/T Niqnaq:
Administration officials said the influential pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC was already at work pressing for military action against Assad, fearing that if Syria escapes US retribution for its use of chemical weapons, Iran might be emboldened in the future to attack Israel. House majority leader Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican in Congress, has long worked to challenge Democrats’ traditional base among Jews. One administration official called AIPAC “the 800 lb gorilla in the room,” and said its allies in Congress had to be saying:If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, we’re in trouble.
NewsDiffs reports that the article had no less than nine edits:
President Gains McCain’s Backing On Syria Attack (NYT), Change Log
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/world/middleeast/syria.htmlBy JACKIE CALMES, MICHAEL R. GORDON and ERIC SCHMITT | First archived on September 2, 2013, 1:18 p.m.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/world/middleeast/syria.html
Related articles
- AIPAC is trying to stay out of sight, but it will be worth watching the CPMAJO’s daily alert (niqnaq.wordpress.com)
- Why Is the Israel Lobby Keeping Quiet on Syria Crisis? (alethonews.wordpress.com)
FLASHBACK 2007:
Jewish Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
By Forward Staff
Published February 02, 2007, issue of February 02, 2007.
While Jewish communal leaders focus most of their
current lobbying efforts on pressing the United States to take a tough
line against Iran and its nuclear program, some are privately voicing
fears that they will be accused of driving America into a war with the
regime in Tehran.
In early advocacy efforts on the issue, Jewish organizations stressed the threat that a nuclear Iran would pose to Israel in light of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s calls to “wipe Israel off the map.”
Now, with concerns mounting that Israel and its supporters might be blamed for any military confrontation, Jewish groups are seeking to widen their argument, asserting that an Iranian nuclear bomb would threaten the West and endanger pro-American Sunni Muslim states in the region.
Jess Hordes, Washington director of the Anti-Defamation League, said that the strategy of broadening the case against Iran was not an attempt to divert attention from the threats to Israel. “It is a fact that Iran is a danger to the whole world,” Hordes said. “We are not just saying it to hide our concerns about Israel.”
Yet many advocacy efforts, even when not linked to Israel, carry indelibly Jewish fingerprints. Last week, Jewish groups claimed victory when the United Nations approved a resolution denouncing Holocaust denial, with Iran’s regime as the obvious target. Additionally, numerous Jewish activists are pressing in advertisements and Internet appeals for Ahmadinejad to be indicted in The Hague for incitement to genocide.
In warning of possible scapegoating, insiders point to the experience of the Iraq War. Since the initial invasion in 2003, antiwar groups have charged, with growing vehemence, that the war was promoted by Jewish groups acting in Israel’s interest — even though the invasion enjoyed bipartisan backing and popular support, and was not at the top of most Jewish organizations’ agendas. The Iraq backlash prompted former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon to order in 2005 that his ministers keep a low profile on Iran.
Now, however, Jewish groups are indeed playing a lead role in pressing for a hard line on Iran. The campaign comes at a time when President Bush’s popularity has reached record lows and members of both parties are cautioning against a rush toward war.
Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, addressed the fears head-on last week in an address to Israel’s prestigious Herzliya Conference. Lamenting what he called “the poisoning of America,” Hoenlein painted a dire picture of American public discourse turning increasingly anti-Jewish and anti-Israel in the year ahead.
Hoenlein dated the trend to the 2005 arrest of two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, on charges of passing classified national security information. Hoenlein argued that the Jewish community made a major mistake by not forcefully criticizing the arrests. Speaking via video, Hoenlein listed several events that had occurred since then: the release of the essay criticizing the “Israel Lobby” by two distinguished professors, Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer; the publication of former president Jimmy Carter’s best-selling book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid”; the suggestion by former NATO supreme commander and Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark that “New York money people” were pushing America into war, and claims by former U.S. weapons inspector Scott Ritter that Israel is pushing the United States to attack Iran.
“In the beginning of the Iraq war they talked about the ‘neocons’ as a code word,” Hoenlein said. “Now we see that code words are no longer necessary.” He warned that the United States is nearing a situation similar to that of Britain, where delegitimization of Israel is widespread.
“This is a cancer that starts from the top and works its way down,” he said. “It poisons the opinions among elites which trickle down into society.”
According to Hoenlein, such critics tend not only to delegitimize Israel but also to “intimidate American Jews not to speak out.” He called on American Jews to take action against this phenomenon, saying that Christian Zionists seemed at times more willing than Jews to fight back.
Another instance of casting blame, less widely reported, was attributed to former secretary of state Colin Powell. In a new biography, by Washington Post writer Karen De Young, Powell is said to have put at least some of the blame for the Iraq war on Jewish groups. The book, “Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell,” claims that Powell used to refer to the pro-war advisers surrounding former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld as the “Jinsa crowd.” Jinsa is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war.
Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. “I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,” Neumann said.
Whatever worries exist about a negative backlash over Israel, they have not deterred Jewish and pro-Israel activists from publicly pressing for tough U.S. action against Tehran or invoking concern for Israel.
A particularly forceful argument for a hard line against Iran appeared this week in The New Republic, a Washington insider journal widely viewed as a bellwether of pro-Israel opinion. The lengthy article, written by two respected Israeli writers, Michael Oren and Yossi Klein Halevi, both fellows at the Shalem Center, a hawkish Jerusalem think tank, names Iran as the main threat to Israeli survival, regional stability and to the entire world order. This theme has been echoed in publications and press releases put out by most major Jewish groups, including Aipac and the Conference of Presidents.
In early advocacy efforts on the issue, Jewish organizations stressed the threat that a nuclear Iran would pose to Israel in light of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s calls to “wipe Israel off the map.”
Now, with concerns mounting that Israel and its supporters might be blamed for any military confrontation, Jewish groups are seeking to widen their argument, asserting that an Iranian nuclear bomb would threaten the West and endanger pro-American Sunni Muslim states in the region.
Jess Hordes, Washington director of the Anti-Defamation League, said that the strategy of broadening the case against Iran was not an attempt to divert attention from the threats to Israel. “It is a fact that Iran is a danger to the whole world,” Hordes said. “We are not just saying it to hide our concerns about Israel.”
Yet many advocacy efforts, even when not linked to Israel, carry indelibly Jewish fingerprints. Last week, Jewish groups claimed victory when the United Nations approved a resolution denouncing Holocaust denial, with Iran’s regime as the obvious target. Additionally, numerous Jewish activists are pressing in advertisements and Internet appeals for Ahmadinejad to be indicted in The Hague for incitement to genocide.
In warning of possible scapegoating, insiders point to the experience of the Iraq War. Since the initial invasion in 2003, antiwar groups have charged, with growing vehemence, that the war was promoted by Jewish groups acting in Israel’s interest — even though the invasion enjoyed bipartisan backing and popular support, and was not at the top of most Jewish organizations’ agendas. The Iraq backlash prompted former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon to order in 2005 that his ministers keep a low profile on Iran.
Now, however, Jewish groups are indeed playing a lead role in pressing for a hard line on Iran. The campaign comes at a time when President Bush’s popularity has reached record lows and members of both parties are cautioning against a rush toward war.
Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, addressed the fears head-on last week in an address to Israel’s prestigious Herzliya Conference. Lamenting what he called “the poisoning of America,” Hoenlein painted a dire picture of American public discourse turning increasingly anti-Jewish and anti-Israel in the year ahead.
Hoenlein dated the trend to the 2005 arrest of two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, on charges of passing classified national security information. Hoenlein argued that the Jewish community made a major mistake by not forcefully criticizing the arrests. Speaking via video, Hoenlein listed several events that had occurred since then: the release of the essay criticizing the “Israel Lobby” by two distinguished professors, Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer; the publication of former president Jimmy Carter’s best-selling book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid”; the suggestion by former NATO supreme commander and Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark that “New York money people” were pushing America into war, and claims by former U.S. weapons inspector Scott Ritter that Israel is pushing the United States to attack Iran.
“In the beginning of the Iraq war they talked about the ‘neocons’ as a code word,” Hoenlein said. “Now we see that code words are no longer necessary.” He warned that the United States is nearing a situation similar to that of Britain, where delegitimization of Israel is widespread.
“This is a cancer that starts from the top and works its way down,” he said. “It poisons the opinions among elites which trickle down into society.”
According to Hoenlein, such critics tend not only to delegitimize Israel but also to “intimidate American Jews not to speak out.” He called on American Jews to take action against this phenomenon, saying that Christian Zionists seemed at times more willing than Jews to fight back.
Another instance of casting blame, less widely reported, was attributed to former secretary of state Colin Powell. In a new biography, by Washington Post writer Karen De Young, Powell is said to have put at least some of the blame for the Iraq war on Jewish groups. The book, “Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell,” claims that Powell used to refer to the pro-war advisers surrounding former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld as the “Jinsa crowd.” Jinsa is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war.
Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. “I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,” Neumann said.
Whatever worries exist about a negative backlash over Israel, they have not deterred Jewish and pro-Israel activists from publicly pressing for tough U.S. action against Tehran or invoking concern for Israel.
A particularly forceful argument for a hard line against Iran appeared this week in The New Republic, a Washington insider journal widely viewed as a bellwether of pro-Israel opinion. The lengthy article, written by two respected Israeli writers, Michael Oren and Yossi Klein Halevi, both fellows at the Shalem Center, a hawkish Jerusalem think tank, names Iran as the main threat to Israeli survival, regional stability and to the entire world order. This theme has been echoed in publications and press releases put out by most major Jewish groups, including Aipac and the Conference of Presidents.
FLASHBACK 2007:
Top Dem Wesley Clark Says ‘N.Y. Money People’ Pushing War With Iran
By Nathan Guttman
Published January 12, 2007, issue of January 12, 2007
The flap comes as Israeli politicians in the
government, as well as the opposition, have been lobbying more publicly
for an international hard line against Iran’s pursuit of nuclear
weapons. Until the middle of last year, Israel focused its efforts on
more behind-the-scenes international diplomacy, making its intelligence
information available to world powers in order to convince them that
Iran is becoming a growing threat to the entire region. Lately, Israel
decided to take the Iranian issue to the public arena, as well, making
it the leading issue on the agenda in public speeches and press
briefings.
(...)Clark made his alleged remarks to liberal blogger Arianna Huffington in response to a United Press International column by Arnaud de Borchgrave. The column described the efforts of Israeli opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud — to compare Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Adolf Hitler, and the current geopolitical situation to pre-World War II Europe. The article quotes Netanyahu’s call to “immediately launch an intense, international, public relations front first and foremost on the U.S. The goal being to encourage President Bush to live up to specific pledges he would not allow Iran to arm itself with nuclear weapons.”
Netanyahu has positioned himself in recent months as a leading voice outside Israel, calling the world’s attention to the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Though as leader of the opposition he does not speak for the government, Israeli sources have said in recent weeks that Netanyahu’s approach is in line with the strategy of the Olmert government.
Huffington quoted Clark as saying that the idea of bombing Iran before exhausting diplomatic avenues was “outrageous.” According to Huffington, she then asked Clark what made him so sure that the United States is headed in the direction of attacking Iran, and he replied: “You just have to read what’s in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided, but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.”
(...)Clark made his alleged remarks to liberal blogger Arianna Huffington in response to a United Press International column by Arnaud de Borchgrave. The column described the efforts of Israeli opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud — to compare Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Adolf Hitler, and the current geopolitical situation to pre-World War II Europe. The article quotes Netanyahu’s call to “immediately launch an intense, international, public relations front first and foremost on the U.S. The goal being to encourage President Bush to live up to specific pledges he would not allow Iran to arm itself with nuclear weapons.”
Netanyahu has positioned himself in recent months as a leading voice outside Israel, calling the world’s attention to the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Though as leader of the opposition he does not speak for the government, Israeli sources have said in recent weeks that Netanyahu’s approach is in line with the strategy of the Olmert government.
Huffington quoted Clark as saying that the idea of bombing Iran before exhausting diplomatic avenues was “outrageous.” According to Huffington, she then asked Clark what made him so sure that the United States is headed in the direction of attacking Iran, and he replied: “You just have to read what’s in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided, but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.”
The phrase “New York money people” struck unpleasant chords with many
pro-Israel activists. They interpreted it as referring to the Jewish
community, which is known for its significant financial donations to
political candidates.
Abraham Foxman, national director of the
Anti-Defamation League, spoke to Clark shortly after the former general
made his remarks. “He is a friend of Israel and is not an antisemite,”
Foxman told the Forward, “but some of the things he said are very, very
unfortunate.”
Foxman argued that while he does not accuse Clark of
believing in conspiracy theories that paint the Jews and Israel as
pushing the United States into war, the former general “fueled the
flames and gave credibility to these theories.”
Michael Collins Piper, The Golem
Chapter Twenty-Three
"New York Money People":
Jewish-Born American General
Points the Finger at the Warmongers
New
York money is not only playing a big part in 2008 presidential campaign
politics, but it's also a driving force behind the ongoing push by
pro-Israel fanatics at the highest levels of U.S. policy-making to force
the United States into a senseless war against Iran.
That's
the only conclusion that can be reached based on a survey of multiple
and wide-ranging news reports—circulating largely within publications in
Israel and in the American Jewish community—that have not been brought
to the attention of most Americans through the aegis of the so-called
"mainstream media."
It's almost as
if the major media in America is simply determined to prevent average
Americans from knowing that there are some people who believe that
Israel and its well-heeled backers in the United States are the primary
advocates for U.S. military action against Iran.
Perhaps
the most explosive comments in this regard came from Gen. Wesley Clark
(ret.), who was a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination
in 2004 and who—until then, at least—was considered a likely candidate
for the Democratic nod in 2008. In an interview with columnist Arianna
Huffington, Clark said that he believed that the Bush administration is
determined to wage war against Iran. When asked why he believed this,
Clark said:
You just have to read what's in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.
In
short, Clark was saying that powerful New York-based financial
interests (those whom he called "the New York money people") are putting
pressure on political candidates and incumbent politicians to support a
war against Iran.
In fact, Clark
was correct. Jewish community newspapers have indeed noted, time and
again over the past several years, that many in the American Jewish
community and in Israel are urging U.S. military action against Iran.
And in Israel, of course, the bellicose talk of Israel itself attacking
Iran is commonly and publicly discussed with free abandon. All of this
is little known to the American public.
Despite
this, Clark came under fire and was accused of "anti- Semitism" or
otherwise charged with lending credence to what are dismissed as
"anti-Israel and anti- Jewish conspiracy theories," which—Clark's angry
critics said—suggest that Israel and its supporters are prime movers
behind the drive for war.
Because
Clark is the son of a Jewish father (although he didn't know that until
several years ago, having been raised by a Christian mother and a
Christian step-father who never told Clark of his Jewish heritage), some
Jewish leaders were pulling their punches, recognizing that it sounded
somewhat outlandish to call Clark "anti-Jewish." But the word is
definitely out in the Jewish community: "Clark can't be trusted."
On
Jan. 12,2007, the New York-based Jewish newspaper, Forward, carried a
front-page story zinging Clark for his remarks, noting that,"The phrase
New York money people' struck unpleasant chords with many pro- Israel
activists. They interpreted it as referring to the Jewish community,
which is known for its significant financial donations to political
candidates."
The fact that Jewish
leaders and publications were attacking Clark for using the term "New
York money people" was ironic, inasmuch as just the week before the
furor over Clark's comments, the same Forward, in its own Jan. 5, 2007
issue, had a front-page story announcing that pro-Israel stalwart U.S.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) had lined up significant financial support
for his own 2008 presidential campaign from those whom—in its own
headline—Forward called "New York money men."
In
that revealing article, describing McCain's "heavily Jewish finance
committee," Forward announced that, in recent weeks, "McCain has been
signaling that an attention to Jewish issues will remain on his agenda
as his campaign moves forward." The Jewish newspaper did not mention
whether McCain will direct any attention to Christian, Muslim, Buddhist
or Hindu issues—or any other issues of concern to other religious
groups.
The article in Forward made
it clear that support from these "New York money men" is critical in the
forthcoming presidential campaign and that it could be pivotal, whether
that money stays in McCain's camp or ultimately goes elsewhere.
This
information could prove a surprise to grass-roots Republicans all over
America who think (apparently incorrectly) that they are the ones who
actually pick their party's presidential nominee.
In
addition, in light of the fact that Jewish groups attacked Clark for
suggesting that "New York money people" were pressuring political
candidates to push for war against Iran, it is interesting to note that
Forward pointed out that one of the key "New York money men" supporting
McCain cited the issue of Iran as one of the reasons why he was boosting
the Arizona senator.
Dr. Ben
Chouake, who is president of the pro-Israel NORPAC, a political action
committee, and a member of McCain's finance committee, was cited as
having remarked that Iran is "an immense threat to the United States,
and this is an immense threat to Israel," and that "the person that is
the most capable, most experienced, most courageous to defend our
country, would be John McCain."
Clearly,
the "New York money people" are playing a major part in the American
political arena, throwing their weight behind who gets elected— and who
doesn't—and whether or not America goes to war.
That's something that Americans need to know about, but they had better not count on the mass media to tell them about it.Une stratégie pour Tel Aviv dans les années 80
Publié le 12/09/2013 à 12:03 par konigsberg
Extraits d’un article de la revue Kivounim (Orientation), publié par l’« Organisation Sioniste mondiale »
à Jérusalem (n° 14, février 1982). Ils présentent un plan de
démembrement des États arabes qui constitue la référence du projet de
« remodelage du Proche-Orient » de l’administration Bush.
Archives de février 1982
« La
reconquête du Sinaï, avec ses ressources actuelles, est un objectif
prioritaire que les accords de Camp David et les accords de paix
empêchaient jusqu’ici d’atteindre (…) Privés de pétrole et des revenus
qui en découlent, condamnés à d’énormes dépenses en ce domaine, il nous
faut impérativement agir pour retrouver la situation qui prévalait dans
le Sinaï avant la visite de Sadate et le malheureux accord signé avec
lui en 1979.
La
situation économique de l’Égypte, la nature de son régime, et sa
politique panarabe, vont déboucher sur une conjoncture telle qu’Israël
devra intervenir…
L’Égypte, du fait de ses conflits internes, ne représente plus pour nous un problème stratégique, et il serait possible, en moins de 24 heures, de la faire revenir à l’état où elle se trouvait après la guerre de juin 1967. Le mythe de l’Égypte « leader du monde arabe » est bien mort (…) et, face à Israël et au reste du monde arabe, elle a perdu 50% de sa puissance. À court terme, elle pourra tirer avantage de la restitution du Sinaï, mais cela ne changera pas fondamentalement le rapport de force. En tant que corps centralisé, l’Égypte est déjà un cadavre, surtout si l’on tient compte de l’affrontement de plus en plus dur entre musulmans et chrétiens. Sa division en provinces géographiques distinctes doit être notre objectif politique pour les années 1990, sur le front occidental.
L’Égypte, du fait de ses conflits internes, ne représente plus pour nous un problème stratégique, et il serait possible, en moins de 24 heures, de la faire revenir à l’état où elle se trouvait après la guerre de juin 1967. Le mythe de l’Égypte « leader du monde arabe » est bien mort (…) et, face à Israël et au reste du monde arabe, elle a perdu 50% de sa puissance. À court terme, elle pourra tirer avantage de la restitution du Sinaï, mais cela ne changera pas fondamentalement le rapport de force. En tant que corps centralisé, l’Égypte est déjà un cadavre, surtout si l’on tient compte de l’affrontement de plus en plus dur entre musulmans et chrétiens. Sa division en provinces géographiques distinctes doit être notre objectif politique pour les années 1990, sur le front occidental.
Une
fois l’Égypte ainsi disloquée et privée de pouvoir central, des pays
comme la Libye, le Soudan, et d’autres plus éloignés, connaîtront la
même dissolution. La formation d’un État copte en Haute-Égypte, et celle
de petites entités régionales de faible importance, est la clef d’un
développement historique actuellement retardé par l’accord de paix, mais
inéluctable à long terme.En dépit des apparences, le front Ouest présente moins de problèmes que celui de l’Est. La partition du Liban en cinq provinces (…) préfigure ce qui se passera dans l’ensemble du monde arabe. L’éclatement de la Syrie et de l’Irak en régions déterminées sur la base de critères ethniques ou religieux, doit être, à long terme, un but prioritaire pour Israël, la première étape étant la destruction de la puissance militaire de ces États.
Les
structures ethniques de la Syrie l’exposent à un démantèlement qui
pourrait aboutir à la création d’un État chiite le long de la côte, d’un
État sunnite dans la région d’Alep, d’un autre à Damas, et d’une entité
druze qui pourrait souhaiter constituer son propre État —peut-être sur
notre Golan— en tout cas avec l’Houran et le Nord de la Jordanie. (…) Un
tel État serait, à long terme, une garantie de paix et de sécurité pour
la région. C’est un objectif qui est déjà à notre portée.
Riche en pétrole, et en proie à des luttes intestines, l’Irak est dans la ligne de mire israélienne. Sa dissolution serait, pour nous, plus importante que celle de la Syrie, car c’est lui qui représente, à court terme, la plus sérieuse menace pour Israël. Une guerre syro-irakienne favoriserait son effondrement de l’intérieur, avant qu’il ne soit en mesure de se lancer dans un conflit d’envergure contre nous. Toute forme de confrontations inter-arabe nous sera utile et hâtera l’heure de cet éclatement. (…) Il est possible que la guerre actuelle contre l’Iran précipite ce phénomène de polarisation.
La
Péninsule arabique toute entière est vouée à une dissolution du même
genre, sous des pressions internes. C’est le cas en particulier de
l’Arabie saoudite : l’aggravation des conflits intérieurs et la chute du
régime sont dans la logique de ses structures politiques actuelles.
La Jordanie est un objectif stratégique dans l’immédiat. À long terme, elle ne constituera plus une menace pour nous après sa dissolution, la fin du règne de Hussein, et le transfert du pouvoir aux mains de la majorité palestinienne.
La Jordanie est un objectif stratégique dans l’immédiat. À long terme, elle ne constituera plus une menace pour nous après sa dissolution, la fin du règne de Hussein, et le transfert du pouvoir aux mains de la majorité palestinienne.
C’est à quoi doit tendre la politique israélienne. Ce changement signifiera la solution du problème de la rive occidentale, à forte densité de population arabe.
L’émigration de ces Arabes à l’Est —dans des conditions pacifiques ou à la suite d’une guerre— et le gel de leur croissance économique et démographique, sont les garanties des transformations à venir. Nous devons tout faire pour hâter ce processus.
Il
faut rejeter le plan d’autonomie, et tout autre qui impliquerait un
compromis ou une participation des territoires, et ferait obstacle à la
séparation des deux nations : conditions indispensables d’une véritable
coexistence pacifique.
Les Arabes israéliens doivent comprendre qu’ils ne pourront avoir de patrie qu’en Jordanie (…) et ne connaîtront de sécurité qu’en reconnaissant la souveraineté juive entre la mer et le Jourdain. (…) Il n’est plus possible, en cette entrée dans l’ère nucléaire, d’accepter que les trois quarts de la population juive se trouve concentrée sur un littoral surpeuplé et naturellement exposé ; la dispersion de cette population est un impératif majeur de notre politique intérieure. La Judée, la Samarie, et la Galilée, sont les seules garanties de notre survie nationale. Si nous ne devenons pas majoritaires dans les régions montagneuses, nous risquons de connaître le sort des Croisés, qui ont perdu ce pays.
Rééquilibrer la région sur le plan démographique, stratégique et économique, doit être notre principale ambition ; ceci comporte le contrôle des ressources en eau de la région qui va de Beer Sheba à la Haute-Galilée et qui est pratiquement vide de juifs aujourd’hui. »
Les Arabes israéliens doivent comprendre qu’ils ne pourront avoir de patrie qu’en Jordanie (…) et ne connaîtront de sécurité qu’en reconnaissant la souveraineté juive entre la mer et le Jourdain. (…) Il n’est plus possible, en cette entrée dans l’ère nucléaire, d’accepter que les trois quarts de la population juive se trouve concentrée sur un littoral surpeuplé et naturellement exposé ; la dispersion de cette population est un impératif majeur de notre politique intérieure. La Judée, la Samarie, et la Galilée, sont les seules garanties de notre survie nationale. Si nous ne devenons pas majoritaires dans les régions montagneuses, nous risquons de connaître le sort des Croisés, qui ont perdu ce pays.
Rééquilibrer la région sur le plan démographique, stratégique et économique, doit être notre principale ambition ; ceci comporte le contrôle des ressources en eau de la région qui va de Beer Sheba à la Haute-Galilée et qui est pratiquement vide de juifs aujourd’hui. »
par Hélios
Nationalism, Not ‘Exceptionalism’ the Proper Course for America
by Michael Collins Piper
During the 2012 campaign, Mitt Romney spoke of “American exceptionalism.”
The
rhetoric sounded patriotic. In reality, this is a modern-day propaganda
mask for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and
internationalism. Though wrapped in the American flag, there’s nothing
American about it.
Rather than standing for American nationalism,
this philosophy—quite the contrary—is a 21st century manifestation of
the age-old dream of a global government under the rule of an elite few.
Many call it the New World Order.
While some still fear the UN as
the mechanism advancing the agenda, the fact is that the would be rulers
of this global plantation now seek to utilize the U.S. as their vehicle
for achieving that end.
The grand wizards who conjured up American
exceptionalism are those infamous “neo-conservative” high priests of war
who orchestrated the invasion of Iraq and who now seek to contrive a
war against Iran. They crave U.S. military meddling all over the
world—not just in the Middle East.
Perhaps the foremost intellectual
proponent of this warmongering madness is Yale professor David
Gelernter. Defining “Americanism” as an incarnation of biblical Zionism
with “a divine mission to all mankind,” he says the United States is the
base of “American Zionism,” charged with a God-given duty to remake the
world.
“Americanism,” he asserts, is the “creed” of what is the
“fourth great Western religion,” the driving force behind—and which must
establish—a new planetary regime.
“We are the one and only biggest boy [in the world today],” he wrote. “If there is to be justice in the world, America must create it. . . .We must pursue justice, help the suffering and overthrow tyrants. We must spread the creed.”
Real
American nationalists reject the idea the United States should be the
world’s policeman. Instead, nationalists believe in developing and
strengthening their nation from within, maintaining the integrity of its
cultural heritage and sovereign borders, placing their own nation’s
interests first. Nationalists do not start wars of imperialism. They respect the nationalist instincts of others.
Michael Collins Piper
Michael Ledeen: Un néoconservateur adepte de la théorie du « Grand Moyen-Orient »
Aujourd'hui,
il est l'un des plus ardents défenseurs de la doctrine Bush et de la
théorie du Grand Moyen-Orient, partisan de renverser non seulement le
régime irakien du dictateur Saddam Hussein, mais aussi les régimes
d'Iran, de la Syrie, voire de l'Arabie saoudite (ou du moins l'empêcher
de "financer le terrorisme").
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen
The War Against the Terror Masters, by Michael Ledeen, 2003, p.212-213
(neocon ideologue trying to sell the lie of American Exceptionalism to justify more wars for Israel!)
'CREATIVE DESTRUCTION' OF THE ARAB WORLD
(Excerpt from THE HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR, by Michael Collins Piper)
Lest anyone chalk up these comments to "Arab paranoia,"
or "anti-Israel bigotry," note that one of Israel's most
consequential advocates in official Washington — veteran pro-Israel intelligence
community bureaucrat Michael Ledeen, a longtime close friend and associate
of Richard Perle — has put out a propaganda screed titled The War
Against the Terror Masters in which he writes of what he calls "creative
destruction."
Ledeen says that this "creative destruction" is
"entirely in keeping with American character and the American tradition" —
an assertion that will surprise many Americans. Ledeen says that Iraq, Syria,
Saudi Arabia and — for good measure — the non-Arabic Islamic Republic of
Iran — should all be targets of "creative destruction" by
U.S. military might.
"Creative destruction," writes Ledeen, is
"our middle name," — the term "our" referring to Americans, whether or not
they share his imperialist views. According to Ledeen:
"We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone.They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence — our existence, not our policies — threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission."
While his rhetoric is stilted and ponderous, what Ledeen is
promoting is the idea that it is not U.S. support for Israel that
engenders Arab hatred for the United States. Instead, he claims, it is the
very existence of the United States — the "American way of life" —
that inflames Arab passions. (What utter lies! What nonsense!)
Yet, these words are the propaganda line of the Israeli
lobby which hopes to distract the attention of the American people away
from the causes of Arab hostility to the United States stemming from
unswerving U.S. support for Israel. Ledeen goes on to suggest that
anyone who stands in opposition to all-out war against the Arab world
needs to be removed from positions of authority. He writes:
The president has to rid himself of those officials who failed to lead their agencies effectively, along with those who lack the political will to wage war against the terror masters.The top people in the intelligence community need to be replaced, and those military leaders who tell the president that it can't be done, or they just aren't ready, or we need to do something else first, should be replaced as well, along with the people in the national security community who insisted that we must solve the Arab-Israeli question before the war can resume and the top people in agencies like the FAA, the INS, and so forth.'
In fact, aside from other political considerations,
President George W. Bush had good personal reason to do the bidding of the
hard-line hawks in promoting their imperial schemes on behalf of Israel.
In the Feb. 1992 edition of The Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs, former Rep. Paul Findley (R-Ill.) revealed that in
1991 former Israeli intelligence officer Victor Ostrovsky had blown the
whistle on a plot by a right-wing faction within Israel's Mossad to kill
then-PresidentGeorge H. W. Bush who was perceived as a threat to Israel.
After Ostrovsky provided the details to another former
member of Congress, Pete McCloskey (R-Calif.), McCloskey conveyed a
warning to the U.S. Secret Service. In his 1994 book, The Other Side of
Deception, Ostrovsky revealed the specifics of what he had learned of
the plot: the Mossad planned to assassinate Bush during an international
conference in Madrid.
The Mossad had captured three Palestinian
"extremists" and leaked word to the Spanish police that the terrorists were on their
way to Madrid. The plan was to kill Bush, release the "assassins"
in the midst of the confusion — and kill the Palestinians on the spot. The crime
would be blamedon the Palestinians — another Mossad "false flag."[...]
Sur ce blog:
John McCain et les guerres pour Israël
L'utilisation d'armes chimiques en Syrie pourrait être un false flag israélien, selon l'ancien chef de cabinet de Colin Powell sous l'administration Bush, le colonel à la retraite Lawrence Wilkerson
Un lobbyiste pro-israélien appelle à provoquer un nouveau Pearl Harbor pour déclencher une guerre contre l'Iran
Le "méchant" Vlad Poutine en remplacement du "méchant" Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
Les médias juifs désignent Obama comme bouc émissaire du scandale d'écoute électronique par la NSA, pour faire pression sur lui et son administration afin que l'option militaire soit envisagée dès maintenant en Syrie et en Iran
Le jeu des comparaisons: l'islamisme radical est-il plus proche du "nazisme" ou des "Inglourious Basterds"?
Tout pour défendre les intérêts d'Israël: le Canada ouvre la voie à une intervention militaire en Syrie
Question-piège à Laurent Fabius: honnêtement, qui donc "ne mériterait pas d'être sur la Terre" pour son (ses) "opération(s) de destruction d'un peuple" (voire de nombreux peuples)?
L'Occident "chrétien" complice de l'éradication des Chrétiens du Moyen-orient par des représentants de l'Islam le plus décadent
Le printemps arabe: "une incroyable opportunité pour Israël", selon l'ancien directeur du Mossad Meir Dagan et le Maj. Gen. et criminel de guerre Yoav Galant
John McCain et les leçons de la Libye: "Bombardez la Syrie!"
La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les "dictateurs" comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur...
Philip Zelikow (signataire du PNAC): La Libye est un modèle pour la redivision du Moyen-Orient
AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!
La Syrie: prochaine cible du plan sioniste de chaotisation-remodelage du Moyen-Orient?
Après la Libye, la Syrie?
L'American Jewish Committee derrière les mensonges humanitaires qui ont rendu possible la guerre en Libye
L'actuel président du National Endowment for Democracy --- le marionnettiste du "printemps arabe" -- est un ancien de l'ADL
Pourim 2011 (19 et 20 mars) et l'attaque atlanto-sioniste en Libye
Le grand rabbin ashkénaze d'Israël, qui remerciait Bush pour la guerre en Irak, arrêté pour fraude et blanchiment d'argent
The Jewish War of Survival
Chavez n'est plus: les nationalistes et les socialistes du monde entier savent à qui profite la mort de ce grand homme
NY Times: Sans ennemi extérieur à combattre, Israël est voué à l'éclatement
Un des journalistes juifs du Watergate, Carl Bernstein, accuse les "néocons juifs" d'être derrière la guerre en Irak
'A CLEAN BREAK': un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient
Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale