Alors que les dirigeants américains tentent d'élargir leurs relations avec le régime sioniste, les responsables du service du renseignement américain ont rapporté que le régime sioniste espionne même la CIA. L'agence américaine Associated Press, publiant un rapport, a fait état des opérations d'espionnage des services secrets israéliens contre leurs homologues américains. L'Associated Press a évoqué dans son rapport plusieurs cas d'espionnage où les équipements des agents secrets américains à Tel-Aviv ont été secrètement inspectés. Selon ce rapport la CIA pointe du doigt dans cette affaire, le Mossad.Ce rapport montre cette réalité qu'en dépit des relations secrètes entre les Etats-Unis et leurs alliés au Moyen-Orient, les responsables de la sécurité nationale du régime sioniste les considèrent comme un allié saboteur et une vraie menace contre leur service secret.
San Francisco Chronicle (USA) 28 juillet 2012 traduit de l’anglais par Djazaïri
WASHINGTON (AP) — Le chef de la station de la CIA à Tel Aviv avait déverrouillé la boîte qui contenait le matériel sensible dont il se servait à son domicile de Tel Aviv, en Israël, pour communiquer avec le siège de la CIA en Virginie, et n’avait pu que constater que quelqu’un l’avait trafiqué. Ce dont il référa à ses supérieurs.
Cet incident, décrit par trois anciens cadres des services secrets US aurait pu être rangé simplement parmi les péripéties qui émaillent le monde de l’espionnage international, sauf que le même chose était arrivée au précédent chef de station en Israël.
C’était un rappel pas très subtil que, même dans un pays ami des Etats-Unis, la CIA elle-même était sous surveillance.
Dans un incident distinct, selon deux autres anciens officiels US, un agent de la CIA en Israël était rentré chez lui pour découvrir que la place des aliments dans le réfrigérateur avait été modifiée. Dans tous les cas, les autorités US pensent que les services de sécurité israéliens étaient les responsables.
Une telle ingérence souligne ce qui est largement connu mais rarement discuté en dehors du milieu des services de renseignements: malgré les liens incontestables entre les Etats-Unis et leur allié le plus proche au Moyen Orient et malgré les déclarations des politiciens US qui claironnent cette amitié, les officiels de la sécurité nationale des Etats-Unis considèrent qu’Israël est, par moment, un allié frustrant et une véritable menace pour le contre-espionnage.
Outre ce que les anciens officiels US ont décrit comme des violations de domicile au cours de ces dix dernières années, Israël a été impliqué dans des affaires criminelles d’espionnage contre les Etats-Unis, dans des procédures disciplinaires contre les agents de la CIA et mis en cause dans la mort d’un espion important qui travaillait pour le compte de la CIA en Syrie pendant l’administration George W. Bush.
La CIA considère Israël comme étant sa menace N°1 en matière de contre-espionnage pour sa division Proche Orient, le groupe qui chapeaute les activités d’espionnage au Moyen Orient, selon d’anciens et d’actuels officiels.
Le contre-espionnage est l’art de protéger les secrets du pays contre les espions étrangers. Ce qui veut dire que la CIA pense que les secrets d’Etat des Etats-Unis sont plus à l’abri des autres services secrets de la région que d’Israël.
Israël a des services d’espionnage hautement sophistiqués et professionnels qui rivalisent avec les services américains en technicité et capacité à recruter de la ressource humaine. A la différence de la Syrie et de l’Iran, par exemple, Israël, en qualité d’allié indéfectible, bénéficie d’un accès aux niveaux les plus élevés des cercles militaires et du renseignement au sein du gouvernement des Etats-Unis.Les officiels nous ont parlé sous condition d’anonymat parce qu’ils ne sont pas autorisés à parler publiquement de ces questions sensibles pour les relations diplomatiques entre les deux pays.
Les inquiétudes du contre-espionnage persistent alors même que la relation entre les USA et Israël comprennent une étroite coopération sur des programmes de renseignement qui incluraient le virus Stuxnet qui a attaqué les ordinateurs des principaux sites iraniens d’enrichissement d’uranium. Alors que l’alliance [avec le régime sioniste] est centrale dans l’approche des Etats Unis au Moyen Orient, il y a quand même place pour un désaccord important, tout particulièrement dans la tourmente diplomatique au sujet des ambitions nucléaires de l’Iran.
«C’est une relation compliquée,» déclare Joseph Wippl, un ancien officier supérieur des actions clandestines la CIA, et ancien chef du bureau de la CIA pour les affaires parlementaires (Congrès). «Ils ont leurs intérêts. Nous avons nos intérêts. Pour les Etats Unis, il y a un équilibre à trouver.»
La façon dont Washington caractérise sa relation avec Israël est importante aussi dans la manière dont les Etats Unis sont perçus dans le reste du monde, particulièrement dans les pays musulmans.
Les éloges à l’égard des Etats Unis sont allés crescendo [dans l’entité sioniste] avant la rencontre prévue dimanche entre le candidat à la présidentielle Mitt Romney et le premier ministre Israélien Benjamin Netanyahu à Jérusalem. Leur relation remonte à plusieurs dizaines d’années, quand ils s’étaient brièvement croisés dans les années 1970 au the Boston Consulting Group. Tous deux travaillaient comme conseillers de cette firme au début de leur carrière, avant que Romney fonde en partenariat sa propre société de gestion de placements. Romney a déclaré dans un discours la semaine dernière qu’Israël était «un de nos amis les plus chers, » et a critiqué Obama pour ce qu’il a qualifié de «traitement médiocre» de l’Etat juif par l’administration Obama.
«Le peuple d’Israël mérite mieux que ce qu’il a reçu de la part du leader du monde libre,» a déclaré Romney dans un appel clair à l’électorat juif américain et aux électeurs évangélistes pro-Israël.
(...) In her latest spew, Barbara Hartwell identifies herself as a “Nazi hunter.” She goes on to comically claim that the CIA has been “chock full of Nazis since Day One.” She writes:
“CIA has been chock full of Nazis since Day
One — I unfortunately have decades of experience in my personal war with
these rat bastards. I’ve become a Nazi hunter by necessity, by choice,
and as a matter of integrity and honor.”
I would hardly be surprised if this psychotically deranged “Nazi
hunter” turned out to be a full-fledged employee of the Jewish pedophile
agency, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, or a card-carrying
member of the Likud Party, or a senior Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi. But let’s
dissect her mind-blowingly asinine assertion that the CIA was staffed
with “Nazis” from the outset.
The precursor to the CIA was the Office of Strategic Services or OSS for short. The OSS was created during World War II by the heavily Jewish U.S. administration of Jew-lover Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It’s
main purpose and function was to INFILTRATE, UNDERMINE and SABOTAGE the
Axis Powers, principally National Socialist Germany. Of the OSS’s wartime activities, Wikipedia says:
“From 1943–1945, the OSS played a major role in
training Kuomintang troops in China and Burma, and recruited Kachin, and
other indigenous irregular forces for sabotage as well as guides for
Allied forces in Burma fighting the Japanese Army. Among other
activities, the OSS helped arm, train and supply resistance movements,
including Mao Zedong’s Red Army in China and the Viet Minh in French
Indochina, in areas occupied by the Axis powers during World War II. The
OSS also recruited and ran one of the war’s most important spies, the
German diplomat Fritz Kolbe. Other functions of the OSS included the use of propaganda, espionage, subversion, and post-war planning. One of the greatest accomplishments of the OSS during
World War II was its penetration of Nazi Germany by OSS operatives. The
OSS was responsible for training German and Austrian individuals for
missions inside Germany. Some of these agents included exiled communists
and Socialist party members, labor activists, anti-Nazi
prisoners-of-war, and German and Jewish refugees.“
In sharp contrast to the outrageously false propaganda of the kosher clown Barbara Hartwell, the OSS was established to FIGHT Nazi Germany on behalf of International Jewry! In reality, the OSS was not “chock full of Nazis” but was filled
to the brim with Jews, Zionists, communists, socialists, as well as
Jew-sympathizing anti-Nazi German and Austrian traitors bent on deposing the arch enemy of World Jewry — Adolf Hitler and his righteous regime!
In a book entitled, They Dared Return: The True Story of Jewish Spies Behind Enemy Lines in Nazi Germany,
the philosemitic author Patrick K. O’Donnell tells the story of five
subversive Jewish spies recruited into the OSS who had been tasked with
infiltrating and sabotaging Nazi Germany during the war. A hook-nosed
Zionist-Jewish professor named David Strom wrote a glowing review of the aforementioned book in which he tells us that the five anti-Nazi Jewish spies were recruited by the OSS “because of their language skills and their physical prowess and technical skills, but also for their hatred of Nazi Germany,” and that the leader of the Jewish OSS spy network “had
confidence in himself, in his trained Jewish OSS companions and in
their allies and supporters among whom were several former German
soldiers now willing to betray their Fuhrer for the greater good of
Germany.”
The OSS’s chief training operative organizing and recruiting these anti-German subversives and spies during WWII was a fervent Zionist Jew from New York named Nahum Amber Bernstein.
A lawyer by trade, Bernstein became the OSS’s point man responsible for
coordinating “overseas operations in enemy territory” during the war.
Bernstein would later harness the skills that he developed during his
stint as an anti-Nazi saboteur for the OSS in the service of Israel. He
played an instrumental role in helping establish the State of Israel
through his fundraising and smuggling activities for the Jewish
terrorist force Haganah and in his function as the attorney for
the “Jewish Agency,” the murderous Zionist governmental body that
oversaw the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948.
The holocaust scam is collapsing. They’ll do anything to maintain this fable.
“To this day there is no air photo evidence
to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any location in Europe
occupied by the Germans during World War Two. Further, air photo
analysis refutes the claim that the Nazis had intended, at whatever
time, to keep events in the alleged extermination camps secret. In many
cases the air photos provide clear proof that some of the events
attested to by witnesses, such as the destruction of the Hungarian Jews
or the mass executions at Babi Yar, did not in fact take place. We may
hope that the release of Soviet air photos dating from the time the
camps were in operation will shed further light on these issues. The
fact that these photos have not been published to date may already speak
for itself. That the photos in Western hands were altered in order to
incriminate Germany, and were first published by the CIA, is also very
significant indeed.”
It is worth noting that Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield,
a wealthy and well-connected Zionist-Jewish lawyer from Montreal,
Canada, was a member of the OSS and later the CIA. Prior to joining the
OSS, Bloomfield joined the British military and served in Palestine as
an intelligence officer under the British pro-Zionist fanatic General
Charles Orde Wingate. During his time in Palestine Bloomfield and the
Rothschild-controlled British military helped train the Jewish Haganah
terrorist army which would go on to perpetrate the Nakba — the
forced uprooting and expulsion of nearly a million Palestinians from
their homeland, numerous massacres of civilians, massive looting and
pillaging, and the wholesale decimation of over 500 Arab Palestinian
villages — in 1948. It has been credibly established that Bloomfield
and a cabal of his Jewish kinsmen engineered the assassination of
President John F. Kennedy through a shadowy Mossad front company called
Permindex, because of Kennedy’s opposition to Israel’s nuclear weapons
ambitions. (See:Final Judgment by Michael Collins Piper And Opium Lords by Salvador Astucia)
If “Nazis” ran or otherwise controlled the CIA, do you honestly think
they would have allowed a Jewish international gangster like Bloomfield
in the midst of their organization? The illogicality and downright
hilarity of this should be pretty obvious by now.
CIA directors have bosses too. They do not answer to the US president or to congress, but to the Jews.
The CIA has continued its ferociously pro-Jewish/pro-Zionist policies
to the present day. The CIA has been in bed with Israel and its terror
apparatus the Mossad for many decades, and is kissing cousins with
America’s domestic Jewish lobby. The CIA is nothing more than an
instrument of International Jewry considering that everything the CIA
does works to the benefit of Jewish and Israeli interests — this fact
alone demonstrates that the so-called “Nazi presence” in the CIA is a
flaccid fable. In fact, George Tenet (the director of the CIA from 1997-2004), in a letter of groveling servitude to ADL director Abe Foxman, made it perfectly clear that the CIA is a pro-Jew and pro-Zionist entity, stating:
“I will not tolerate anti-semitism, or any
other form of discrimination, at the CIA. It is repugnant to me and to
all that our Agency and Country stand for. For these reasons, when Mr.
Ciralsky’s allegations first arose, I assembled a group to examine
whether the CIA engaged in anti-semitism. The group reported to me that,
based on its review, it found no anti-semitism.”
The CIA has been incessantly waging psychological, economic and drone
warfare against the Muslim enemies of Israel in the Middle East ever
since the Israeli false flag attack of 9/11,
and is, alongside Mossad, up to its eyeballs in subversive coups, false
flag terrorism and targeted assassinations against governments and
leaders in the Arab/Islamic world that Israel doesn’t like. If “Nazis”
controlled the CIA would it be behaving in such a pro-Jew and
pro-Zionist manner and would it be perpetrating atrocities against the
enemies of the Jews? Even a small child could answer that question
correctly.
Alex Jones loves the Jews more than he loves himself.
The bottom-feeding disinformation of this scum-ridden Jewish shill,
Barbara Hartwell, is offensively stupid. It would require one to
literally have no brain in order to believe anything that comes out of
the squirrelly mouth of this verminous bitch. I have thoroughly
demonstrated that her hysterical claims of “Nazis in the CIA” is
absolute Jewish hogwash. Her claim that the OSS/CIA is “Nazi” in origin
or in character is so preposterous that perhaps only Alex ‘if you want to kill the Jews you’re gonna have to kill me‘
Jones would fall for this Hebraic tripe. The CIA, as I have shown, is
thoroughly and completely Jewish in its founding and current form and
serves no other function than to facilitate, implement and maintain
Jewish domination over gentiles.
Le vice-président iranien estime le Talmud responsable du trafic de drogue dans le monde Le Monde.fr avec AFP | 27.06.2012
L'enseignement du Talmud, le livre sacré du judaïsme, est responsable de la diffusion de la drogue dans le monde dont le principal opérateur est Israël, a affirmé le premier vice-président iranien, Mohammed Reza Rahimi.
Si vous croyez que c'est possible d'arrêter le Mossad comme on arrête n'importe quelle organisation, alors vous ne comprenez pas en quoi le Mossad n'est pas une organisation comme les autres. Les agents du Mossad sont extrêmement peu nombreux et secrets. Pour vous imaginer un peu quelle tâche immense cela représente de stopper le Mossad, au États-Unis seulement, imaginez seulement ce que ça prendrait pour réussir à faire en sorte que plus personne n'achète de drogue!
Le Mujahadeen e Khalq (MeK), un groupe terroriste, est sur le point
d'être réhabilités et retirés de la liste officielle des groupes
terroristes grâce à l'influence exercée par les sionistes et leurs
laquais au sein des gouvernements occidentaux. C'est pour la simple et
bonne raison que, comme Israël et les USA, le MeK s'oppose violemment au
gouvernement iranien actuel d'Ahmadinejad.
Les bons terroristes, ceux qu'Israël et les US sionistes aiment, sont ceux qui s'opposent au gouvernement iranien, donc il faut comprendre que ce ne sont pas de vrais "terroristes", ce sont des "combattants pour la liberté"....
-Jews in the news –Gingrich bowing before Maryam Rajavi, head of the terrorist cult Mek. –SEAL training shooting at targets depicting Muslim women Download Here
Is the Arafat poisoning story a provocation to incite a Third Intifada? L'auteur pose la question: "La récente nouvelle sur l'empoisonnement d'Arafat est-elle une provocation pour inciter une Troisième Intifada?" Laquelle justifierait bien sûr, des "représailles" meurtrières d'Israël contre ses voisins hostiles, "islamistes terroristes".
After the death of Yassir Arafat, a declaration was issued by 200 rabbis of Pikuach Nefesh asserting that the anniversary of the death of 'this Amalek of our generation' should be celebrated as 'a day of rejoicing'.[27]
http://www.haaretz.com/news/right-wing-groups-welcome-arafat-s-death-1.139977 Right-wing groups welcome Arafat's death
By Haaretz Staff | Nov.12, 2004 | 12:00 AM
Right-wing organizations were unanimous yesterday in welcoming Yasser Arafat's death.
The Yesha Council of settlements said Arafat was "a hater of Jews who sowed bereavement in thousands of Israeli homes." It expressed hope that with his passing, "the false idea that withdrawal and uprooting will bring peace and security will also vanish from this world, creating an opening for diplomatic agreements based on real peace, on construction and settlement, rather than on delusions and `partners' who were and remain terrorist leaders."
National Religious Party Chairman Effi Eitam said: "Today a heavy cloud has been removed from the values of life, freedom and liberty .. [Arafat] is gone, but his teachings have sunk like poison into the hearts of his people, and it will take many years to heal this wound ... The Palestinians must now strive to return to a culture of life, justice and compassion, so that in the future, we will be able to speak together to achieve peace and quiet."
The Jewish Leadership faction of the Likud urged the government to rescind its consent to "Arafat's burial within the borders of Israel" (i.e. the West Bank). The government, it said, should follow the precedent set with Adolf Eichmann: "We scattered Eichmann's ashes outside Israel's territorial waters."
The Pikuach Nefesh organization, an association of rabbis who oppose territorial concessions, said that "the day of Arafat's death should be a day of rejoicing," as Arafat was "the Amalek and the Hitler of our generation."
The history of the Jewish people dramatically demonstrates that, from the moment God told Abraham that He would bless the world through his offspring, Satan earmarked his descendants for destruction.
Indeed, hatred of Abraham's children through Isaac and Jacob dates back to the very calling out of this special nation. Long -- from the Jewish prespective, never-ending -- has been the list of those who have sought to annihilate the Jewish people. Some of the more well-known antisemites have been Pharoah (who, in Moses's time, ordered the killing of all Jewish baby boys) Amalek, Haman, Antiochus Epiphanes, Nero, Hitler and Arafat.
Jews and enemies go together like peanut butter and jam. Or perhaps hummus and falafel. On the Shabbas before Purim we recite the infamous injunction to “Remember what Amalek did to you… as you came forth from Egypt, how he encountered you on the way and cut down all the weak who straggled behind you.” (Deuteronomy 25:17-18) Amalek, the prototypical enemy of the Jews, is a direct ancestor of Haman—and both of them get compared to Hitler. But while the memory of Amalek provides a chance to remain aware of genocidal evil, it can also turn into a certain myth: that we are plagued by an eternal enemy, the perpetual anti-Semite who takes different forms in every generation. Contemporary secular Jews may throw out everything biblical, spiritual, and Talmudic about Judaism—but they will hold onto the myth of the enemy and the memory of victimhood. The nice thing about being persecuted is that it proves that you are extra special. But the idea that our enemies are linked—that they turn into one another, is mythic baloney.Amalek turns into Haman turns into Hitler turns into Arafat, turns into Osama bin Laden turns into Ahmadinejad.
http://sentinellenehemie.free.fr/fruhinsholz1.html Haman n'est pas mort... Par Gérald Fruhinsholz
Nous prions qu’Israël et le peuple juif en diaspora passent de bonnes fêtes de Pourim, sereines et joyeuses.
Pourim, c’est l’histoire de la reine Esther et de son cousin et père adoptif Mardochée ou Morde’haï, et c’est aussi celle d’un grand criminel, Haman. Haman est le descendant spirituel d’Amalek, qui a eu d’autres descendants, tels Pharaon, Antiochus, et dans les derniers temps, Hitler, Arafat, et Mahmoud Ahmadinejad qui a comme prétention de rayer Israël de la carte.
Danile Luria, Executive Director, Ateret Cohanim FROM THE DESK OF DANIEL LURIA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ATERET COHANIM/ISRAEL
Almost two weeks ago, on a Friday evening (Shabbat), we were reminded of the seeds of Amalek that still prey on the Jewish People in the Land of Israel. A beautiful family from Itamar – Ruth and Udi Fogel and children Hadas, Elad and Yoav - were brutally murdered by Arabs after a serene family Shabbat meal, punctuated by Divrei Torah, and Shabbat songs. It is hard to comprehend such hatred and “animal behavior”, that included the horrific stabbing of young children as they slept. But if one remembers who we are dealing with in this region - Hamas, Hizbollah, PA, El Aksa Brigades, Iran, Syria and millions of surrounding Arabs who want to see the end of the Jewish State of Israel, then such actions are indeed comprehensible. Sadly, since we returned home on masse, over 200 years ago, we have been witness to waves of violence, pogroms, riots, murders, suicide bombers, missiles and a series of wars of annihilation. The truth must be said - Amalek is alive. The legacy of Agag (King of Amalek), Haman, Hitler, Grand Mufti Husseini, and Arafat, is seen clearly in today’s leaders from many Arab countries and in the PA/Hamas. (...)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism_and_violence#cite_ref-97 Purim and the Book of Esther
The Book of Esther, one of the books of the Jewish Bible, is a story of palace intrigue centered on a plot to kill all Jews which was thwarted by Esther, a Jewish queen of Persia. Instead of being victims, the Jews killed "all the people who wanted to kill them."[96] The king gave the Jews the ability to defend themselves against their enemies who tried to kill them.[97] numbering 75,000 (Esther 9:16) including Haman, an Amalekite that led the plot to kill the Jews. The annual Purim festival celebrates this event, and includes the recitation of the biblical instruction to "blot out the remembrance [or name] of Amalek". Scholars - including Ian Lustick, Marc Gopin, and Steven Bayme - state that the violence described in the Book of Esther has inspired and incited violent acts and violent attitudes in the post-biblical era, continuing into modern times, often centered on the festival of Purim.[98]
Lustick, Ian, For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, Council on Foreign Relations, 1988. pp ix-xi.
"Of decisive importance to Jewish fundamentalists is their belief that contemporary political developments are part of an unfolding cosmic drama that will determine, depending on the willingness of Jews to act decisively on its behalf, whether God's redemption of his people Israel, and of the whole world, will or will not soon reach its completion…. The massacre in the Hebron mosque on the Jewish holiday of Purim is a tragic, but telling, example. Preceded by a rash of killings of Jewish settlers by Muslim fundamentalists … it is not in the least a coincidence that the massacre took place on the Jewish holiday of Purim. For most Jews Purim means listening to .. the Book of Esther .. .It is an occasion for merry-making, games, charity and the exchange of gifts. But as Goldstein sat reading that same book on Purim even in 1994, it is almost certain he identified Yasir Arafat with Haman, the arch-enemy of the Jews of ancient Persia, and the killing of Jewish settlers over the previous months with Haman's murderous designs. Accordingly, he [Goldstein] focused on often-ignored verses at the end of the book [of Esther] which, for Jewish fundamentalists, capture the essence of the story under contemporary circumstances and contain a divine imperative to act. According to the Book of Esther the Jews are saved by the king who reverses Haman's evil decree and declares instead that Jews may do unto their enemies what their enemies had intended to do unto them 'to stand up for themselves, to destroy, to slay, and to annihilate any armed force of any people or province that might assault them, with their little ones and women' (Esther 8:11)….By mowing down Arabs he believed wanted to kill Jews, Goldstein was re-enacting part of the Purim story."
Stop and think for a moment: the last Gulf War in 1991 ended erev - just before - Purim. This Gulf War began motzei - just after - Shushan Purim. Get the picture?
Of course this war against Iraq and Saddam Hussein is for us ...
... this war is for us - i.e., the Jews and Israel. Chazal - our sages - throughout the ages have explained the Torah, telling us that everything that happens in the world is for the benefit of the Jewish People.
Simply put another way, if all the world is a stage, then the Jews - and especially those in the Land of Israel - are the lead actors on the stage of history, and the goyim - the nations, i.e. the gentiles - have supporting roles, while the evil-doers are props and background scenery. As our tradition states, G-D - the great playwright - created the world for the sake of the Jewish People, and it is our responsibility to implement the Torah - absolute morality and the blueprint of creation - in it.
Stop and think for a moment: the last Gulf War in 1991 ended erev - just before - Purim. This Gulf War began motzei - just after - Shushan Purim. Get the picture? In between, "The Jews had light, and gladness, and joy, and honor." (Book of Esther 8:16)
Read the Purim story in Megilat Esther again, it is a rags to riches story on a national scale. Haman, the proto-typical anti-Semite, plans mass murder of the Jews and in the end pays with his life, the life of his ten sons - all hanged - and the Jews kill 75, 800 members of the anti-Semitic - i.e. Nazi - party of the time.
... As I said earlier, of course this war is for the Jews and Israel, and instead of hiding from the accusation, or crying, "anti-Semitic slur", we should gratefully acknowledge what the Master of the Universe is doing to our enemies for us. Saddam Hussein, YasserArafat, Bashar Assad, Osama Bin-Laden, and the other dictators, terrorists and mullahs of the region, are the modern day Hamans ...
The Amalekites And Yasser Arafat Q. I was asked, and don’t know the answer behind the story, so I’m hoping you can explain; why did God (and why would he) command Saul in 1 Samuel 15:3 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”
If children are innocent, why the children? I’ve heard other commentators suggest that Agag’s family-tree eventually led to Yasser Arafat and that if Saul had followed God’s command, today there would be no Palestinian issue haunting the Jews.
A. In Exodus 17:8-16 the Amalakites attacked the Israelites and were defeated, but the Lord swore vengeance on them and said He would completely blot out the memory of them. The fact that it took supernatural power to defeat the Amalekites and the severity of the Lord’s pledge to destroy them indicates there was more going on here than the text reveals.
When Saul was chosen as Israel’s first king he was told to completely destroy the Amalekites as an instrument of the Lord’s vengeance (1 Sam 15:3). He botched the assignment which cost him his position. Although Saul later killed King Agag, he allowed others from the Amalekites to escape (1 Chron. 14:43). The descendant of one of these was Haman the Agagite who almost succeeded in destroying the Israelites in the time of the Persian Kingdom. The Book of Esther records this story which is memorialized in the feast of Purim.
Since then, evil men who have in mind the destruction of the Jews are often said to be Amalekites. Adolph Hitler, Saddam Hussein, YasserArafat, and Iranian Pres. Ahmadinejad are the ones most often mentioned. I think the association is more based on the similarity of their intent than on actual blood lines.
http://www.mesora.org/DeathoftheWicked.htm Our Biblical Command: Obliterate Evil and its Memory
Moshe Ben-Chaim
Watching the news last night, I further admire President Bush on how he expressed his condolences to the “Palestinian people”. I applauded his denial of any talks with Arafat, viewing him as an unfit partner in peace due to his known terrorist activities and support of Hamas and Hezbulla. Then I heard Clinton’s condolences, and a clear distinction was noticed:
“Bill Clinton offered his condolences to Arafat's family, to his partners in the PLO and to the Palestinian people.”
President Bush stated choice words, not recognizing Arafat at all or even mentioning his name, addressing the “Palestinian people” alone:
“We express our condolences to the Palestinian people. For the Palestinian people, we hope that the future will bring peace and the fulfillment of their aspirations for an independent, democratic Palestine that is at peace with its neighbors. During the period of transition that is ahead, we urge all in the region and throughout the world to join in helping make progress toward these goals and toward the ultimate goal of peace.”
The President in no way addressed or recognized Arafat ["MAY HIS NAME BE OBLITERATED" ; "QUE SON NOM SOIT EFFACÉ À TOUT JAMAIS"], only the Palestinian people, as his concern is to assist a people who have long been misled by this terrorist leader. The President desires to see all mankind benefit from a democratic government, guided by God’s Biblical morality. As President Bush views Palestinians as a people who are comprised of both - terrorists and those who are not – he sees this nation as possibly embracing moral and just codes, while eradicating terror. This is the President’s view and vision.
The President has again earned my respect in his unwavering commitment to identify terrorists, and not conceding to any emotional sentiments, even when “death” evokes these feelings in others. The President has displayed a praiseworthy character. This is no small point, and one, which must be valued by us all. Many times our emotions sway our logic, and when one of the most powerful emotions is awakened, I mean “pity”, most people succumb, abandoning true values. The President has remained firm, consistent, and committed to his clear perception of a just morality. It is disheartening that a majority of Jews do not recognize this, even suggesting the unthinkable: that Arafat deserved medical attention. In contrast, no excuse is available for Bill Clinton and Kofi Anan, both expressing condolences for Arafat’s family, as if some loss exists, thereby displaying some value for this known terrorist. This contrast is the point I wish to commence with.
The Amalekite Nation: God’s Response to Evil:
The Bible contains precise, consistent definitions, including who is categorized as evil, and how evil must be viewed and treated. The Bible is a system of absolute truths and values formulated by God - the first and last word.
In Deuteronomy 25:17-19 we read of the Amalek nation. They sought to destroy the Jews, not based on national or military concerns, but due to their opposition to the philosophical role Jews possess as Bible leaders, and thus, their identification with God. Verse 18 says, “and they did not fear God”. We learn that Amalek is not defined through lineage, but through their deadly values. Therefore, all those who embody the Amalekite personality are equally defined as “Amalek”, and eventually, must be obliterated. Arafat, more than anyone, embodied Amalek’s trait of denying the Jews’ role of Bible recipients and its teachers. His desire for the Palestinian capital in Jerusalem denied God’s Biblical oath that Israel and Jerusalem are gifted to Abraham and his descendants. Our receipt of the Bible on Mount Sinai was for the express purpose of studying God’s word and teaching all mankind in His ways. Arafat saw to it that far fewer Bible scholars exist to address God’s mission. Arafat was truly one who “did not fear God.” This defines the Amalek personality.
Remembering and Not Forgetting Amalek
So essential is the identification and uprooting of evil, that the Bible’s 613 Commandments include the remembrance of Amalek as one of those commands: (Exod. 17:14) “And God said to Moses, ‘Write this remembrance in a book, and place it in the ears of Joshua, for you shall utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under the heavens’.” In this very command, God instructs Moses to “place these words in Joshua’s ears”. Why Joshua? The reason is because Joshua will next lead Israel, thus, God’s command hints to the ‘successive’ need to address new incarnations of Amalek throughout time. Identifying and uprooting evil will always be a leader’s chore. But we may ask why Amalek is a recurring phenomenon.
This idea of “not forgetting” is an essential aspect of wiping out those who oppose God, and His Bible. “Don’t forget” is addressed to a part of the human psyche that wishes such supression. How do we explain this phenomenon? Why would one wish to forget the evils perpetrated by terrorists and evildoers? One answer may be man’s self image. Man wishes to be liked, and this is an understandable need. But man may feel that rejoicing in the death of the wicked, as King Solomon demands, is not morally correct. A person might feel poorly of himself for harboring such sentiments. However, the Bible teaches (Kings I, 3:12) that God granted King Solomon wisdom, unparalleled by any of his predecessors or followers:
“Behold I have done according to your words, behold I have give to you a wise heart, and understanding, that none were like you before you, and after you, none will rise like you.”
Knowing Solomon’s wisdom is of unmatched, Divine origin, we must now read his words on the death of evildoers: “and with the destruction of the wicked, [there is] song.” (Ecclesiastes, 11:10)
If we allow any pity for Arafat to resonate, as expressed by Clinton, Anon and France, we then initiate a journey down a dangerous and self-destructive path. For when we lack a clear definition of evil, we cannot identify and eradicate it: certainly when we show pity for evil. Evil will then most certainly thrive.
This view is what both Clinton and Kofi Anon expressed. They identified with Arafat, in some respect. It is one thing to identify a praiseworthy character trait in Jacob’s twin brother Esau, without praising the entire person. But it is dangerous and foolish, when one recognizes the ‘person’ of Arafat, and worse, suggesting he sought peace, and then mourning his death. However, King Solomon makes it clear: one must be on guard of his emotions of remorse that might be expressed at the death of the wicked. Therefore, King Solomon states we must sing: we must actively realign our emotions with God’s Biblical philosophy to deplore evil in death, just as in life. The bodily “action” of song is required to get our emotions back in line with truth: abstract opinions do not work here. Solomon knew how the emotions work, manipulating the mind by embracing remorse: normally a good emotion. One might also feel remorse at ALL deaths. Death is usually looked at as a sorrowful event. Therefore, this uneasy but Biblically mandated, “celebrative” view of Arafat’s death requires us to follow God’s reasoning and not our knee-jerk emotions. We cannot allow this emotion of pity and sorrow to monopolize our minds, and mitigate our view of “evil”. We must now rejoice in the death of this vicious murderer, this slayer of babies.
So evil was Arafat, a true Amalekite, that not only is his existence an evil, but even his remembrance must be blotted out. This is also a Biblical law. For as long as his name is recalled by humanity, the danger exists that man might be attracted to some element of his personality. But even more derailing of God’s goal that man learns the truth, is that God’s name is obscured, so long as evil exists. This is what is meant when Moses said, “For the hand is on the throne of God, warring with Amalek, from generation to generation.” (Exod. 17:16) Moses stated that God’s “hand” (as it were) is raised in pledge of an eternal war against Amalek – any individual who opposes God will be warred with. (Nachmanides) The word for throne in this verse is in an incomplete form, thereby teaching that God’s very name in the world is yet obscured and incomplete, as long as evil has followers. God’s Biblical laws and philosophies must be the exclusive guidebook for all mankind. There mere memory of Arafat is intolerable. President Bush was correct not to mention his name.
“From generation to generation” means that each generation must wage a war on terror, as it can always return. The very germs of Amalek have human personality as their origin, and we are all human. The real chance exists for Arafat’s philosophies to gain ground with others, and murder more innocents. Neo Nazis and other hate groups are proof. Allowing any recognition of evil to go unchallenged, allows the Arafat/Amalekite philosophy to fester, enabling atrocities to once again become commonplace. This cannot be. The evildoers must always be recognized and repudiated, and those who soften the blow, also must be censured: Clinton, Anon and France included.
In addition to God’s Flood and destruction of Sodom, the Bible is replete with instances condemning evildoers, and what our correct sentiments must be:
“God protects all those who love Him, and all the wicked He will destroy.” (Psalms, 145:20)
“God is only merciful to the merciful.” (Talmud Sabbath, 151)
“Because King Saul had mercy on Agag (the Amalekite) there came from him Haman who pained the Jews.” (Path of the Righteous, Gate VIII)
As recipients of God’s Bible, His Torah, which demands a clear identification and sustained condemnation and obliteration of evildoers and their memory, we must be thankful, praising President Bush for not wavering at all from his committed war on terror, as he expressed by not recognizing Arafat, even in death.
Arafat’s Terrorism – Partial List (Courtesy Arutz Sheva News)
(...)
English: Ancient custom of deleting Haman's name during the reading of the Esther scroll on Purim
Qafár af: Coutume ancienne de l’effacement du nom de Haman lors de la lecture du Rouleau d’Esther à Pourim
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Purim 2012: Kill the “Anti-Semites”
POURIM : - TEMPS DE JUGEMENTS, FINS BRUTALES D'ENNEMIS D'ISRAEL3 mars 2012
Procés de Nuremberg
- ACCOMPLISSEMENTS DE JUGEMENTS DEMANDÉS PAR ESTHER :
I-a) Souccot (Fête des Tabernacles) 1946 : 16 octobre 1946 -Pendaison de dix dignitaires nazis :
Suite au procès de Nuremberg le 16 oct 1946 /21 Tichri 5707, 10 nazis furent pendus. Ceci accomplissait une demande faite du temps de la Reine Esther (chap 9: 7-9). En effet, elle avait demandé au roi de Perse Assuérus/Xerxès, de pendre une seconde fois les 10 fils d’Haman. Pourtant ils avaient déjà été pendus le jour d’avant 13 Adar. Cette seconde demande était faite un 14 Adar, jour de Pourim (généralement en mars) : Le roi dit à la reine Esther : «Les Juifs ont tués et faits périr dans Suze, la capitale, cinq cents hommes et les dix fils d’Haman.» Elle lui demande : «S’il plait au roi, qu’il soit donné aux Juifs de Sused’agir encore demain selon le décret d’aujourd’hui, et que l’on pende au bois les dix fils d’Haman. » (Esther 9:12).
REMARQUES : – Chaque fois que l'on parle du roi, s'il est précisé "le roi Assuérus" il s'agit bien de lui, mais lorsque le mot "Roi" seul est écrit, cela fait référence à Dieu. Or la demande d'Esther est faite au Roi… sans le nom d'Assuérus. Cette demande est par conséquent adressée à Dieu lui-même. «…Qu'il soit donné aux Juifs(…) encore demain(mahar en hébreux) »
– Les sages juifs enseignent qu'il faut comprendre dans le mot mahar, non pas le lendemain, mais un futur éloigné. Voir aussi "le livre caché" :
– Nous savons qu'Haman est un descendant d’Amalek, l’ennemi juré d’Israël, comme il est écrit , "Haman fils d’Hamedata, descendant d’Agag le roi d’Amalek» L'enseignement des rabbins précise que «la Germania descend d’Amalek… »
I-b) Nuremberg et Pourim 1946
– Plus de 2400 ans après au procès de Nuremberg, c’est précisément le septième jour de Souccot 5707, le 16 Octobre 1946, dans la nuit d’Hoshaana Raba, que furent pendus les dix «dignitaires» nazis à l’issue du procès de Nuremberg ! Sur 24 accusés, 12 sont condamnés à mort, mais seulement 10 seront exécutés… et par pendaison ! L’un parvint à s’échapper (Martin Bormann), un autre (Hermann Göring) se suicida la veille de son exécution avec une capsule de cyanure. Or ce 16 octobre /21 Tichri, l’un des 10 nazis, Streicher, avait crié avant sa pendaison : «fête de Pourim 1946 ! » Ainsi il a rappelé le livre d’Esther et l’exécution d’Haman et de ses fils.
– Ce 16 Octobre 1946 (21 Tichri 5707) était le 7ème jour de la fête des Tabernacles, (Souccot). Le 7eme jour de Souccot est considéré comme le jour exécutoire du jugement final, figurant le «Jugement dernier».
– En 1946, le Pourim cité par Streicher tombait théoriquement le 17 Mars /14 Adar II 5706. *(1)
II)- Libye
1)Pourim 2011 – Attaque de la Libye(19-20/03/2011)
La décision d’intervenir en Libye ( résolution 1973) fût prise à l’O.N.U le jeudi 17 mars 2011 /11 Adar II (1) qui était le jour de la célébration du «Jeune d’Esther»,. L’attaque a commencé 3 jours après, au début de la nuit du 19 au 20 mars 2011 /14 Adar II (1) au moment de la fête "Pourim"
2) Souccot 2011 – Mort de Kadhafi le 20 Octobre 2011
( 8eme jour de la fête de Souccot )
- La mort de Kadhafi le 20 octobre 2011 /(22 Tichri 5772 ) Après le «jour exécutoire des jugements» du 21 Tichri, vient le «grand jour de fête» qui marque un nouveau commencement couronnant la fête des Tabernacles, le 22 Tichri. C’est le jour de la fin de Kadhafi, rien d’ennemi ou d’ancien ne peut participer à ce jour-là
III)- Irak
1)Pourim 1991 -28/02/91 La Première guerre contre l’Irak nommée «Tempête du désert» débuta le 17 janvier 1991,et se termina au bout de 42 jours, le 28 février 1991 /14 Adar 5751 (Pourim 1991 !), aux portes de Bagdad. Douze ans s’écoulèrent dans le calendrier hébraïque, jusqu’à… Pourim 2003 (18 mars /14 Adar(II) 5763)
2) Pourim 19-20 Mars 2003 -2eme Attaque de l’Irak Dans la même série de Jugements, en 2003, le «Jeûne d’Esther» tombait le lundi 17 mars 2003 /13 Adar(II) 5763 Ce même jour, un ultimatum de 48h fût signifié à l’Irak de Saddam Hussein ! L’attaque débuta effectivement le 3ème jour après le «Jeûne», la nuit du 19 au 20 mars 2003 /16 Adar(II) 5763 à la fin de la fête de Pourim. Elle dura 8 ans et 9 mois jusqu’au retrait des derniers combattants américains le 18 décembre 2011
– Saddam Hussein avait été capturé , près de 9 mois après les premiers bombardements, la nuit du 13 au 14 déc 2003 Il a été pendu après 3 ans d’un long procès, le 30 déc 2006 /9 Tevet 5767. C’était la veille d’un «Jeûne du 10ème mois» (mois de Tevet). Ce Jeûne commémore un malheur : le début du siège de Jérusalem par Nébucadnetsar le 28 décembre -589 /10 Tevet 3172 avant sa prise et la destruction du premier Temple le 29 juillet -586 /9 Av 3174.
.. Or il est notoire que Saddam Hussein se targait d’incarner Nebucadnetsar roi de Babylone (aujourd’hui Hillel en Irak)… inversement dans son cas ce fût lui, son pays et sa capitale qui fûrent assiégés et pris !
*(1) Note: 1946 – 2003 -2011étaient des années de 13 mois lunaires avec 2 mois d’Adar (I et II) pour réajuster les mois lunaires et solaires dans le calendrier hébraïque.
REMARQUES COMPLÉMENTAIRES :
1- Rappel : Le 13 Adar, correspondant à la célébration du jeune d’Esther, est le jour ou Esther a fait sa première demande au roi d’exécuter les fils d’Haman demande accomplie le jour même. La seconde demande eu lieu le lendemain, 14 Adar, jour de Pourim
Dans le calendrier hébraïque, les jours de célébration du jeune d’Esther (13 Adar) correspondent respectivement a l’ultimatum adressé par les U.S.A en 2003 à l’Irak et en 2011 à la résolution de l’O.N.U d’intervenir en Libye
Il ne faut pas oublier que le calendrier hébraïque a été «consacré» par les sacrificateurs et donc «sanctifié» par Dieu : les dates des fêtes ou événements sont sous la souveraineté de Dieu !
– Les exemples étudiés montrent clairement que la seconde demande qu’Esther avait faite au «Roi» (Esther 9: 12-14) est toujours exécutoireenvers ceux qui veulent détruire les juifs ou plus encore Israël! La parole «irrévocable» du roi des Perses (ombre de celle du vrai Roi des Rois) est un Jugement divin qui court toujours !
- Deux petits + au passage : Jesus-Christ est ressuscité le 3ème jour en l’An 3790 ou l’An 3793 hébraïques (30 ou 33) .. Esther est sortie du Jeûne, le 3ème jour (fêté le 13 Adar) : tout un symbole ! En fait le Jeûne et Pourim présentent beaucoup d'aspects de la Pâque. Par ailleurs la seconde demande d’Esther contre les 10 fils d’Haman s'est appliquée le jour de Pourim, 14 Adar, le 5ème jour après le début de son jeûne. Souvenons nous que pour Dieu «un jour est comme mille ans» (Ps 90: 4 et 2 Pie 3: 8)… les jugements prononcés ont été exécutés dans les années commençant par 5 du calendrier hébraïque. Effectivement, des Jugements correspondant à la seconde demande d’Esther sont intervenus, comme nous avons vu : en Oct 1946 /5707 pour les nazis. En Irak : Mars 2003 /5763 et Dec 2006 /5767 (Saddam). En Libye : Mars 2011/5772 et Oct 2011/5772 .
Dès lors on peut se demander quel sera le prochain ?Un des candidats évident est Ahmanjnejhad (décomposable en «Ahaman» et «Jihad», lui aussi demeurant en Perse comme Haman). Faudra-t-il attendre une année de 13 mois comme dans les cas étudiés ? Les prochaines seront 2014 et 2016…
2- Observons que les 17 mars ressortent avec insistance dans tous les cas soit pour Pourim, soit pour le Jeûne. Il se trouve que le jour de célébration du jeun d’Esther , correspondant à l’éxécution des fils d’Haman le 13 Adar 3287 qui était un 17 mars en 473 av. J.C. **(2) - La seconde demande d’Esther concernant de nouveau les fils d’Haman et qui tombait le jour de Pourim, le 18 mars – 473, correspondant à l’exécution des chefs nazis s’est accomplie .à Souccot , le samedi 16 octobre 1946 – un 21 Tichri , jour «d’exécution des jugements» ! De la même façon pour Kadhafi , la résolution d’intervenir eut lieu à Pourim 2011 et sa mort eut lieu à Souccot, le 20 octobre 2011, un 22 Tichri. Des jugements différés qui s’accomplissent à la fin de la fête des Tabernacles… "Jour d’exécution des Jugements«, préfiguration du Jugement Final !
**(2) Note : Haman a été pendu entre le 1er -Pessah- et le 3ème mois (probable comme le vrai temps du jeûne d'Esther); Ses fils le 12ème de la même année hébraïque (Esther 3: 12 entre Pessah et le mois de Juin -23 sivan-, Esther 8: 9)… Hitler était mort aussi (30 avril 1945) entre la Pâque et le mois de juin 1945 qui est le mois de Sivan, celui de la Pentecôte)… avant ses 10 «fils idéologiques» en octobre 1946.
AUTRES TYPES DE JUGEMENTS
– Anouar el Sadate avait attaqué Israël le samedi 6 octobre 1973 /10 Tichri 5734, jour sacré du Kippour (Grand Pardon) tombant de plus un sabbat, jour doublement solennel pour les juifs ! C’est une faute très grave d’attaquer Israël un tel jour chargé de sens… Saddate est mort 8 ans plus tard, le 6 octobre 1981 /8 Tichri 5742, justement lors de la commémoration de cette attaque devenue fête nationale en Egypte ! Cette guerre avait de plus inclus la fête des Tabernacles puisqu’elle s’était terminée le 24 octobre /28 Tichri.
L’un des points communs de ce Jugement avec ceux vus précédemment, outre qu’il s’agissait d’années de 13 mois lunaires, est qu’il s’accomplit en Automne (morts naturelles sans de telles «significations spirituelles», comme Nasser 28 sept 1970, Arafat 11 nov 2004…) et plus spécialement au mois de Tichri [NOTE DU GENTIL: MOIS DE TICHRI, COMME LE PROCÈS DE NUREMBERG ET LA PENDAISON DES CONDAMNÉS].
Ran HaCohen propose un papier sur la fête juive de Pourim qui est l’occasion pour les fidèles de se déguiser mais aussi de se saouler la gueule, ce qui serait d’après lui une des obligations liées à cette fête.
Toujours d’après Ran HaCohen, La fête de
Pourim est intrinsèquement associée à la violence, celle qu’auraient
subie les Juifs d’après le Livre d’Esther et celle que les Juifs
auraient pour obligation d’infliger à leurs ennemis identifiés à
Amalek/Haman.
Cette obligation allant jusqu’à
l’extermination, Dieu faisant même le reproche à Saül d’avoir péché en
épargnant le roi Agag qui aurait été un ancêtre d’Haman, le vizir de
l’empereur Perse qui avait comploté pour exterminer les Juifs.
Ran HaCohen rappelle justement que
certains actes de violence contre les palestiniens coïncident avec la
fête de Pourim tel le massacre perpétré à Hébron aux cris de Joyeux
Pourim» par Baruch Goldstein en 1994.
Si vous vous intéressez à ce salmigondis
théologique, je pense que vous trouverez pas mal d’éléments sur la toile
ou dans n’importe quelle bibliothèque municipale.
Quant à moi, je ne souhaite pas creuser
présentement cet aspect mais simplement vous traduire le passage que Ran
HaCohen consacre à une vidé éducative produite par le grand rabbinat de
l’armée sioniste pour expliquer Pourim aux jeunes recrues.
On comprend mieux pourquoi l’armée sioniste est la plus morale du monde.
Elle [la vidéo] commence par exposer une
évidence, c’est-à-dire que la Perse est l’Iran actuel ; parmi les images
qui clignotent à certains moments quand le nom d’Haman est mentionné,
on voit non seulement Ahmadinejad mais aussi Nasrallah le chef du
Hezbollah ainsi que, à plusieurs reprises, Hitler et, oui, Jésus Christ
qui fait une brève apparition.
Dans une réécriture sans fondement de la
légende, qui vise à clairement les palestiniens d’aujourd’hui, Haman et
ses fils sont présentés comme ayant vécu dans la terre d’Israël où ils
prêchaient la haine contre les Juifs et exigeaient l’arrêt de la
construction à Jérusalem (!) avant de partir s’installer en Perse qui
est le lieu de l’action du Livre d’Esther.
En d’autres termes, la vidéo “éducative”
de l’armée trace un continuum de Haman à Jésus puis à l’Allemagne nazie
et à l’Iran actuel et au Hezbollah ainsi qu’aux palestiniens
contemporains. Et Haman, ce que la vidéo ne s’embarrasse même pas à
rappeler à son public, est Amalek, l’ennemi éternel des Juifs : «tu
effaceras la mémoire d’Amalek de dessous les cieux, n’oublie pas.»
CARICATURE DE POURIM., parue sur le site du journal israélien le plus
mainstream et conservateur THE JERUSALEM POST. En référence à la
tradition de Pourim qui incite à boire comme un trou au point de ne plus
pouvoir faire la distinction entre béni soit Mardochée et et maudit
soit Haman. Haman étant un peu l'ancêtre du mythique méchant Hitler
génocidaire dans la tradition juive. Ahmadinejad est très souvent
assimilé à Haman, comme l'a été Saddam Hussein. De même que de
nombreuses personnalités historiques célèbres, incluant certaines dont
on n'aurait jamais soupçonné qu'ils aient été à ce point haï des juifs
(ex: le clan Kennedy au grand complet fut détesté par le lobby parce que
papa Kennedy "conspirait contre eux", et surtout parce que JFK "ne se
mêlait pas de ses affaires" c'est-à-dire qu'il voulait pas autoriser la
construction de l'arsenal nucléaire israélien avec l'argent des
États-Unis.)
Purim.
One of the most popular Jewish holidays among Orthodox, traditional and
so-called secular Jewish Israelis alike. The streets are packed with
children and adults wearing costumes, make-up and all sorts of
masquerading, on their way from one joyous Purim party to the next.
Happy days. But behind the carnivalesque masks, ominous demons are
lurking.
Tel Aviv, Sunday, February 24th
Hanan Usruf, a 40-year-old Arab sanitation worker for the city, was savagely beaten by some dozen Jewish men. The Jerusalem Post reported that Usruf’s injuries
include a fracture in his
right eye socket and deep lacerations on his right ear and across almost
his entire head. His vision is blurred in his left eye, but he can make
out small numbers and letters, doctors said.
The Times of Israel added
that the victim – an Israeli citizen, one should add – attacked by
“drunken youth” required dozens of stitches and that doctors were doing
their best to save his eye; under his horrendous photo in hospital, Usruf is quoted saying that
the youths kicked him and
broke bottles on his head while shouting racial epithets at him. “They
shouted things like ‘f**kin’ Arab’ and ‘get your own country.’
Jerusalem, Monday, February 25th
Hana Amtir, an Arab woman
standing at the tram stop near the central bus station, was attacked by a
group of young Jewish women. AFP quotes a (Jewish) eyewitness who took pictures of the attack and documented it on Facebook:
Suddenly shouts were heard,
and a group of young religious Jewish women confronted the woman and
suddenly a young Jewish woman punched her in the head, […] the rest then
joined in, hitting and shoving the Arab woman. The woman tried to fight
them off but they shouted at her not to dare touch Jews and they
continued as a group to attack her and even forcibly pulled off her head
covering, […] the incident was witnessed by a security guard from the
rail company and a group of ultra-Orthodox Jewish students who stood by
and did nothing.
Framing
Both events – the lynch in Tel Aviv and the attack in Jerusalem – were reported widely in the Israeli media (separately or eventogether [Hebrew]),
justly framed as hate crimes, sometimes with reference to similar
crimes in the recent past. Some public protest followed – a
demonstration, petitions and op-eds. However, no report I’ve seen
mentioned the fact that both crimes were committed on Purim (24.2), a
one-day holiday that lasts a day longer in Jerusalem (24-25.2). At best,
one could find the holiday mentioned in passing, for instance in the Times of Israelthat
also described the Tel Aviv victimizers as drunken: “Police had yet to
make any arrests […] After detaining suspects, the police will determine
whether the attack was racially motivated, or the action of out-of-hand
Purim revelers,” as if racist motivation and Purim revelry were
mutually exclusive. But as a rule, Purim was simply ignored as
irrelevant.
Is the Jewish holiday really irrelevant? The notion that the attackers were drunken can be easily traced back to the religious duty to
get drunk on Purim. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Purim has
been identified with Jewish violence (and with accusations of violence
against Jews, true or false) for centuries. Just think of the West Bank
town of Hebron for example: it was Purim 1981 when Jewish settlers
brought down the roof over an Arab upholstery in “Beit Hadassah”,
expelling its owner and taking over the house, a crucial step in what
has since developed into a full-fledged ethnic cleansing at the heart of
the Palestinian town. The settlers’ Purim parades in that city have
become a tradition of provocations, with Jewish violence escalating from
year to year – culminating in Purim 1994, when a Jewish settler massacred 29
and injured 125 Muslim worshippers in the Cave of the Patriarchs. The
butcher joined the settlers’ hall of fame: “Purim in Hebron after 1994
was like Purim in Hebron since 1981, only more so – with a new Jewish
hero for Jewish children to dress up as,” writes Israeli historian Prof
Elliott Horowitz in his excellent Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence (2006,
p. 8), that documents the roots and history of Jewish Purim violence
(alongside with its anti-Semitic abuses by Christians) from ancient
times to the present.
Why Purim?
Like any legacy stretching from
the Ancient World through the Middle Ages to Modern Times, Judaism is a
multifaceted culture: it can be universal as well as nationalist;
egalitarian as well as racist; liberal, even revolutionary as well as
ultra-conservative – all these messages can be found in it. Among other
things, Purim, however, has always reflected deep genocidal phantasies
of revenge. The Book of Esther, the textual basis for this holiday,
tells the story of the miraculous saving of the Jews of Persia from
their enemies, most notably the evil Haman. It ends with the hanging of
Haman by the Persian King. Consequently, the Jews take revenge and kill
Haman’s ten sons, murder several hundreds of non-Jews in the capital
Susa, and then massacre seventy-five thousand non-Jews all over Persia.
That’s how the Book of Esther ends. The (probably non-existent)
historical foundations of these events are irrelevant: it’s the myth and
the memory that matter.
The genocidal roots of Purim go
even deeper: Haman, as the short Book of Esther repeatedly stresses, is
an “Agagite”, that is, an offspring of Agag. Agag was the King of the
ancient Amalekites, the archetypal enemy of the Jews, on which the Bible
commands to inflict genocide: “you shall blot out the remembrance of
Amalek from under heaven; do not forget” (Deuteronomy 25,19). When King
Saul sins by sparing King Agag’s life, God regrets He had made him king
of Israel, and Prophet Samuel “hews Agag in pieces before the Lord” (I
Samuel 15,33).
These are not just idle
interpretations for the learned or deep secrets known to the few; it’s
all anchored in the liturgical practice of Purim. While the public
reading of the Book of Esther is at the heart of the holiday itself, the
Torah-text on blotting out Amalek is read in synagogue on the “Sabbath
of Remembrance”, the last Saturday before Purim.Once the Arabs are seen
as Haman/Amalek, Purim turns into a carneval of incitement against them.
Educating Israeli Soldiers
The Chief Rabbinate of the Israeli army has recently produced ashort video (in
Hebrew) to “explain” Purim to Israeli soldiers. It opens by stating the
obvious, namely that Persia is today’s Iran; among the images that
flash every now and then when Haman is mentioned we see not only
Ahmadinejad, but also Hezbollah’s leader Nasrallah, as well as (several
times) Hitler, and, yes, Jesus Christ, who also makes a brief appearance.
In a baseless rewriting of the legend, obviously aimed against
present-day Palestinians, Haman and his sons are said to have resided in
the Land of Israel, where they were inciting against the Jews and
demanding to stop construction in Jerusalem(!) before moving to Persia, where the Book of Esther takes place.
In other words, the army
“educational” video draws a line from Haman to Jesus, to Nazi Germany,
to today’s Iran and Hezbollah, as well as to the present-day
Palestinians. And Haman, as the video doesn’t even bother to remind its
viewers, is Amalek, the eternal enemy of the Jews: “you shall blot out
the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven, do not forget.”
From Hebron to Tel Aviv
It’s truly amazing that the
Israeli media ignored the Purim context of the violent events in Tel
Aviv and Jerusalem. Jewish Israelis are witnessing a trend of
“rediscovering of” and “reconnecting to” their “Jewish roots”. In such
an atmosphere, one would expect those “rediscoverers” to be aware the
Jewish context of the violence: after all, this is also part of the
Jewish legacy they are allegedly so fond of. But no: instead of coming
to terms with the lights and shadows of the rich Jewish tradition,
non-Orthodox Israelis fall prey to ominous Jewish demons without even
noticing them, demons that have enjoyed an uninterrupted existence among
Orthodox Jews like the radical settlers of Hebron, but have now sneaked
even into “secular” Tel Aviv.
Operation Haman comme nom de l'opération visant à tuer JFK... C'est pas prouvé mais vraisemblable. Ce nom illustre bien ce
que représentait l'opération consistant à tuer Kennedy, quels intérêts
ça servait. Pour comprendre le personnage maudit de Haman dans le drame
du peuple juif devant-toujours-se-battre-pour-sa-survie, il faut relire
le livre d'Esther.
Voyez ce que le livre de Michael Collins Piper sur l'assassinat de JFK intitulé "FINAL JUDGMENT" révèle concernant cette habitude juive consistant à identifier ses ennemis à Haman pour les faire assassiner. Piper intitule même sa conclusion "Operation Haman? The Theory That Works":
(...)However, the primary reason behind
Ben-Gurion's departure was the Israeli leader's inability to pressure
JFK into accepting Israel's demands. According to Hersh: "There was no
way for the Israeli public . . . to suspect that there was yet another
factor in Ben-Gurion's demise: his increasingly bitter impasse with
Kennedy over a nuclear-armed Israel." (143) Ben-Gurion had failed. The
battle had been lost, but the war between the two men was still to be
won.
A MODERN-DAY HAMAN?
What was on Ben-Gurion's mind as he
turned over the reins of government to his successor? What was David
Ben-Gurion's final act as Prime Minister of the Jewish State? In light
of Ben-Gurion's explicit comment to John F. Kennedy that "my people have
the right to exist . . and this existence is in danger," we can
certainly make a good presumption.
In Ben-Gurion's eyes, John F.
Kennedy was clearly a modern-day Haman—an enemy of the Jewish people. In
Jewish folklore, Haman was a descendant of the Amalekites who served as
prime minister to King Ahasueros of Persia. It was Haman who sought to
convince the king that all of the Jews of his empire should be
exterminated forever.
However, according to legend, a beautiful
Jewish temptress named Esther used her feminine wiles on Ahasueros and,
in the end, it was Haman who was instead put to death. The important
Jewish holiday of Purim celebrates the deliverance of the Jews from
Haman's intended holocaust.
In the Bible—Deut 25:19, I Sam. 15:8—the
ancient Hebrews were urged to "blot out the memory of the Amalekites"
from whom Haman descended.
In Israel—in 1963—David Ben-Gurion
certainly looked upon John F. Kennedy as a modern-day Haman, a son of
the Amalekites. As he pondered the brutal conflict with JFK, Ben-Gurion
no doubt remembered the meditation that is read on Purim:
"A wicked
man, an arrogant offshoot of the seed of Amalek, rose up against us.
Insolent in his riches, he digged himself a pit, and his own greatness
laid him a snare. In his mind he thought to entrap, but was himself
entrapped; he sought to destroy, but was himself speedily destroyed . . .
he made him a gallows, and was himself hanged thereon."
(...)
THE COMING OF THE MESSIAH
With
John F. Kennedy lying in a grave in Arlington National Cemetery, Israel
was safe—for the time being at least. The modern-day heir of Haman's
legacy had been destroyed. That Lyndon Johnson—a man with a steadfast
history of loyalty to Israel and its American lobby—was in line to
assume the American presidency was a fact not gone unnoticed. Israel's
messiah had come.
(...)"CONCLUSION:Operation Haman? The Theory That Works"(...)
Was there a code name for the conspiracy
against President Kennedy? More than likely. But we, of course, will
surely never know its name. Did the Mossad, perhaps, call it "Operation
Haman"—naming the conspiracy to kill the American president after Haman,
the ancient Amalekite conspirator who desired the destruction of the
Jewish people? That code name would be as reasonable as any, considering
Ben-Gurion's hatred for Kennedy—a modern-day Haman in his eyes.
(...)
In
1979 when Connally launched a well-financed bid for the 1980 Republican
presidential nomination, he publicly challenged the power of the
Israeli lobby in a highly controversial speech that, by all accounts,
led to the end of Connally's presidential ambitions once and for all.
But
what is interesting is that Connally' s speech was considered so
inflammatory by the Israelis and their Americans supporters that a
prominent Israeli educator and philosopher, Emmanuel Rackman, president
of Bal Ilan University, actually called for Connally's assassination.
Comparing
Connally to Haman, the ancient enemy of the Jewish people, Rackman—a
rabbi—issued his call for Connally's assassination in the November 18,
1979 issue of The Jewish Week-American Examiner, the publication of the
Israeli-government owned Jewish Telegraph Agency, a subdivision of the
worldwide Jewish Agency.
Rackman's vicious attack on Connally was
headlined: "John Connally Campaign Seen as Dire Threat to Israel and
U.S. Jewry." Rackman quoted New York Times columnist William Safire as
having said that for "the first time, a candidate for President has
delivered a major address which he knew would disturb and dismay every
American supporter of Israel."(986)
Rackman commented: "This is true.
But does not this observation signify more than it says? Does it not
mean that in Connally we have, for the first time, a candidate who in no
uncertain terms is telling the American people that he does not want
the support of Jews and that he wants to prove that one can be elected
president without Jewish support.
"Furthermore, does it not mean that
at long last we have a candidate who hopes to get elected by mobilizing
support from all who share his total disregard of how Jews feel about
him and is this not an invitation to all anti-Semites to rally behind
him? I am generally not an alarmist but nothing in American politics in
recent years so disturbed me as Connally's subtle communication to Jews
that they can `go to the devil.' Even the Nixon tapes were not so
upsetting.
"The American Jewish community must be alerted. If only we
had stopped Hitler early enough, millions of Jews would still be alive.
And Connally must be stopped at all costs. He must not even get near
the nomination! He must be destroyed, at least politically, as soon as
possible.
It is sufficiently early to make Connally look ridiculous and destroy him politically without bloodshed.
"Perhaps
I am overreacting," said Rackman. "But if I have learned anything
especially from the rabbinic view of Biblical history it is that we are
less fearful and more forgiving of enemies who at least accord us a
modicum of respect than we are of enemies who treat us with disdain,
with contempt. That makes Arafat more acceptable than Connally." (987)
Rackman
compared Connally with Amalek, another foe of the Jewish people:
"'Remember Amalek,' we are told. 'Don't forget.' Eradicate him from the
face of the earth. Simply because Amalek had no respect for us. He
encountered us in his path and casually sought to exterminate us as
vermin.
It is my fervent prayer," said this Jewish religious leader,
"that American Jewry will not minimize the importance of the challenge
they have been given and will act speedily and with devastating
effectiveness."(988)
John Connally was not eradicated as Rackman
urged. But his political career came to a halt after the major media
began a campaign against him.
However, when John Connally died in
1993, the doctors said that Connally's fatal lung condition was a direct
outgrowth of the chest wounds that he had received in the shooting in
Dallas on November 22, 1963. So ultimately, in the end, John Connally
did prove to be yet another victim of Israel—as much as if he had died
on the same day as John F. Kennedy.
