pascasher.blogspot.com: Lesley Hughes, qui a pointé du doigt la responsabilité des sionistes dans le 11 septembre, fait payer le Congrès juif canadien pour avoir détruit sa carrière politique

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRh5tVYg24CyR8w5XkubsNeBlSne7mCsOtcIUpCLAuYMymgl1OWjA

http://mounadil.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/lesley-hughes-fait-payer-le-lobby-sioniste-au-canada/

Lesley Hughes fait payer le lobby sioniste au Canada

Mounadil al Djazaïri écrit: (...) en 2002, elle avait publié un article mettant en doute les motivations officielles de l’invasion de l’Afghanistan par les troupes occidentales et où elle observait que les services secrets russes, allemands et sionistes avaient alerté la CIA sur le risque imminent d’attentat. Des infos qu’elle avait pêchées dans des médias conspirationnistes comme le Daily Telegraph de Londres, Fox News ou le Jerusalem Post.

Mais ce qui lui a valu des problèmes est qu’elle avait observé que

les Etats Unis avaient ignoré les mises en garde, mais que les entreprises israéliennes les avaient prises au sérieux, et avaient (à juste raison) évacué les tours jumelles.

D’où la conclusion par le Congrès Juif Canadien que Mme Hughes était une adepte d’une théorie d’un complot juif pour expliquer les attentats du 11 septembre et que la journaliste était donc une antisémite patentée.

Une idée «saugrenue» qu’elle n’a jamais propagée et à laquelle elle n’a jamais adhéré, explique Mme Hughes.

L’idée du Congès Juif Canadien était peut-être saugrenue mais elle a eu des conséquences très concrètes sur la carrière de la journaliste qui s’était vue retirer illico presto l’investiture de son parti par son leader le ministre de l’environnement Peter Kent, un client du Congrès Juif Canadien et du B’nai Brith.

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQJyVRdZn5H--0tLAYyK5JXk2G9p9EHFH4cmzj1kifSmLIOIiBI

Peter Kent

Il y eut bien sûr d’autres conséquences au niveau de sa carrière avec un certain nombre de portes qui se sont fermées devant elle, sans parler des personnes qui feignaient désormais de ne plus s’apercevoir de sa présence en public.

Un grave préjudice moral donc, mais aussi matériel. En fait cette personne a subi quelque chose assez semblable à ce qui subit encore l’humoriste Dieudonné en France.

Mme Hughes ne s’est pas laissée faire et a porté l’affaire en justice et après plusieurs années de procédure, elle a obtenu un arrangement à l’amiable dont les clauses sont confidentielles, mais avec sans doute beaucoup d’argent à la clef.

Il est vrai qu’elle ne s’était jamais pour sa part, attaquée frontalement au régime et au lobby sionistes. Elle a néanmoins réussi à faire cracher les dollars à ce dernier.

Hughes lavée des accusations d’antisémitisme dans un règlement négocié

par Bruce Owen,

Winnipeg Free Press (Canada)

20 janvier 2013

traduit de l’anglais par Djazaïri

La journaliste Lesley Hughes est enfin débarrassée des allégations d’antisémitisme

Un règlement négocié sans passer par le tribunal a été obtenu dans ses poursuites pour diffamation contre le ministre fédéral Peter Kent, le Congrès Juif Canadien, le B’nai Brith du Canada et quatre hauts responsables de deux organisations juives.

“J’ai besoin de respirer profondément et de reprendre ma vie d’avant,” a déclaré mercredi la journaliste/productrice indépendante.

“J’espère vraiment que les portes qui se sont fermées ces quatre dernières années vont s’ouvrir à nouveau,” a-t-elle dit. « C’étaient des partenariats très importants pour moi, avec des gens que je respectais. Les gens ne vous rappellent pas, ils ne répondent pas à vos courriels, ils ne vous voient pas quand ils vous croisent en public. C’est un exercice où on vous fait «disparaître.»

«Je pense que c’est fini maintenant. Je pense que je peux à nouveau regarder les gens dans les yeux.»

Hughes avait déposé plainte le 16 juin 2009, affirmant que ceux qu’elle poursuivait avaient porté contre elle des accusations fausses et diffamatoires d’antisémitisme en relation avec un article qu’elle avait écrit en 2002 sur les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 à New York.

En conséquence, l’ancien leader du parti Libéral au niveau fédéral Stéphane Dion avait révoqué sa candidature dans la circonscription de Kildonian – St. Paul pour l’élection fédérale de 2008.

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/img/87fb/maddinosaur/24m.jpg

Stephane Dion

Dans un communiqué rendu public, le B’Nai Brith, l’ancien Congrès Juif Canadien et le ministre de l’environnement Peter Kent affirment qu’elle n’est pas antisémite et qu’elle ne soutient pas les théories du complot qui accablent les Juifs et d’autres groupes minoritaires.

Hughes a indiqué que la nature confidentielle du règlement négocié ne lui permet pas d’en donner les détails.

«C’est vraiment un contexte politique et… je ne sais pas quand je pourrai écrire là-dessus,» a-telle dit.

Hughes a aussi indiqué être dans la phase finale de rédaction d’un livre sur son expérience. Hit and Run: My Brilliant Career in Canadian Politics, doit sortir au printemps.

Un extrait de son livre est publié sur son site internet.

“L’écriture a été une sorte de thérapie,” dit-elle de son prochain livre.#

-----

VIDEO - 911: Made in Israel, by Victor Thorn

Dernières nouvelles sur le 11 septembre: démontage d'un reportage de propagande mensongère sur le 11 septembre: Israël et le 11 septembre : les faits démentent Caroline Fourest

La connexion israélienne des attentats du 11 Septembre : tel est le sujet qui provoque embarras, mises à l’index et désinformation de la part de nombreux journalistes et militants associatifs, notamment en France, par Hicham Hamza voir son livre sur Israel et le 11 septembre: "Le grand tabou", qui malheureusement cite le faux chercheur et authentique saboteur et informateur des services secrets (britanniques anglicans) Christopher Bollyn. Un fauteur de trouble à dénoncer à tout prix, pour le bien de l'humanité.

Voir:
FALSE FLAGS--TEMPLATE FOR TERROR
Chapter 28: 9-11 and the New Internet Paradigm:
The Necessity for High-Level Manipulation and Control of the Dissemination of Information

(...) Many of these operatives spent much of their time putting out what could only be described as downright “crazy” theories about 9-11 that redirected attention away from sober, responsible research.

In other instances, they specialized in cranking out often-reckless theories that were quite easily refutable, therefore giving credence to the oft-heard claim from the mainstream media that any and all other dissident 9-11 research was just as silly and unreliable.

And in a number of instances, there were several 9-11 “truthers” who, while pointing the finger of blame at Israel, were (at the same time) engaging in other activity that led many observers to believe that these individuals were “black propaganda” operatives trying to bring discredit to those who believed Israel was indeed responsible for 9-11.

Two such individuals, Christopher Bollyn and Eric Hufschmid—whom many believe were “ringers” inserted into the 9-11 truth movement from the beginning—ingratiated themselves with American Free Press (having pretended to be enthusiastic about my book Final Judgment) and, over a period of time, engaged in a concerted effort to influence AFP’s coverage of 9-11—and not in a positive way.

Ultimately AFP discovered that while Bollyn and Hufschmid supplied a lot of “good” information, that data was mixed in with a variety of “bad” data, the consequence of which was that many of the stories the two generated (working hand-in-hand on a daily basis behind the scenes for well over a year) proved to be of rather dubious value.

At one juncture, Bollyn and Hufschmid tried to convince the editors of AFP that outspoken 9-11 survivor, William Rodriguez—who had been honored by 9-11 truth seekers all over the United States and around the world for his integrity—was some sort of “Zionist agent.”

And despite the fact that independently wealthy American philanthropist Jimmy Walter had bankrolled speaking engagements by both Bollyn and Hufschmid, the dynamic duo also spread the word that Walter—who spent millions of dollars of his own money seeking to alert the public to 9-11 truth—was also a stooge for Israeli interests.

For my own part, I spent an entire week in Malaysia in the company of both Rodriguez and Walter and I never saw any sign that they were working to advance Zionist interests in any way, shape or form.

However, considering the record of Bollyn and Hufschmid, I think it’s safe to say that the same thing cannot be said about them.

Considering all of this, more than a handful of 9-11 dissidents (including many who believed Israel was behind 9-11) ultimately came to conclude Bollyn was actually a disinformation agent using a perverse back-handed way of discrediting AFP and those who believed the Mossad was responsible for 9-11.

Bollyn’s critics correctly pointed out that Bollyn had a pattern of misquoting sources, misinterpreting scientific information, and making assertions about certain matters without any foundational authority.

The consequence was that Bollyn’s disinformation gave ammunition to critics of AFP’s contention that the Mossad was behind 9-11 and as such was enthusiastically bandied about by Zionist propagandists seeking to undermine AFP’s thesis even though the questionable material by Bollyn focused on scientific data that had nothing whatsoever to do with the specific matter of Mossad involvement in 9-11.

In the end, after their deception was unmasked, Bollyn and Hufschmid launched a smear campaign against AFP alleging that we were, too, were really “Zionist agents” trying to cover up Mossad involvement in 9-11, an allegation preposterous on its face to anyone familiar with AFP’s work. Bollyn even claimed that Mark Lane—the anti-Zionist Jewish critic of Israel who pinpointed the CIA’s role in the JFK assassination conspiracy—was a Zionist and a secret asset of the CIA!

Unfortunately—and not unpredictably—a few naive folks actually believed these liars, especially people new to the 9-11 truth movement who didn’t have access to the big picture. However, when all was said and done, the romance between Bollyn and Hufschmid came to a bitter end and the two began accusing one another of being Zionist agents!

And the strange outside possibility was that both of them could actually have been right. After all, not all Zionist agents necessarily know the identities of the others. That’s how complex the world of intelligence intrigue happens to be.

Hufschmid’s own website devolved into a mish-mash of weird commentary (often referencing sexual matters, especially human interaction with animals) and once even included a nude photograph of Hufschmid, taken from the rear, ostensibly for the purpose of explaining some “health” matter Hufschmid felt would interest his readers.

That Bollyn, an American, had spent time on an Israeli kibbutz and later married an Israeli woman—who worked for Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency—was a point many found telling. That his own sister was also married to a Jew and had taken up residence in Israel was also considered somewhat suspicious.

It’s always been my suspicion (based on a variety of data too complicated to delve into here) that Bollyn was a long-standing international free-lance intelligence operative who, for at least a substantial part of his career, was working for the Church of England, which—although many people don’t realize it—has always been an arm of British intelligence, active in global intrigue. In fact, Bollyn and his family have multiple “British” connections which also point toward that conclusion.

And, needless to say, the British Empire—which has long been under the control of the Rothschild Dynasty—has always played a peculiar role in advancing Jewish and Zionist interests, even going back to the days when the woman whom Bollyn claims as an ancestor, Anne Boleyn, was a central player in a grand design that disrupted the traditional role of the Roman Catholic Church in Britain and set the stage for the rise of Jewish financial power in Britain in years to come. (And that is a story in and of itself—worthy of a book that has yet to be written.)

But for those who are interested, an English patriot and critic of the New World order with an abiding interest in 9-11 truth—and who does believe Israel was a key player in that tragedy—has put together a remarkably detailed website (complete with a fascinating variety of links and other valuable information) which delves into the bizarre story of Bollyn and his erstwhile friend Hufschmid. See http://www.takeourworldback.com for more.

In any event, all of this having been said, it’s quite clear that the circumstances surrounding 9-11 gave Israel—along with other power players on the world stage—a new understanding of how the Internet worked and how its resources could be utilized (for better or for worse) in manipulating global opinion.

And as a consequence, people in high places began working to lay forth a plan to ensure that, in the future, the Internet could be used for their own benefit and to undercut those—such as the 9-11 dissidents and other truth-seekers who questioned “official” stories about such matters as the JFK assassination and the Oklahoma bombing and other matters—who stood in opposition to the New World Order agenda.

As we shall see, this carefully-crafted endeavor had even further consequences when the plan was skillfully put into actual working order in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown, Connecticut and the Boston Marathon bombing that followed not long afterward.

The Internet, as a consequence, was no longer simply a venue for truth seekers to “get the word out” about high-level cover-ups. Instead, it became a vehicle used by the high-level conspirators to not only confuse the work of the truth seekers but also to combat them by discrediting them through some of the most manipulative means possible.

It’s a story that has never been told before, but it is a story that must be told, if real truth seekers are going to be able to deal with the big challenges that lie ahead, particularly when confronted with propaganda and disinformation designed to frustrate their efforts to combat the very real forces of Evil that lie behind the New World Order.

Let us then move forward and examine this extraordinary conspiracy in a way that it has never before been dissected. It’s a shocker . . .

Internet’s Leading Encyclopedia Censors True History of Sept. 11
• AFP web editor wages battle for truth about 9-11 attacks
By Dave Gahary

The demise of printed hardcover encyclopedias and the subsequent rise of the electronic web version has brought with it unintended consequences for those wishing to learn the truth on a variety of extremely important topics, information that should be common knowledge to the masses.

In a series of damning emails exchanged with this writer, the predominant Internet-based encyclopedia website, Wikipedia, admitted they censor material they subjectively deemto be controversial in reference to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, although their censoring is not limited to 9-11.

The reason this admission is so significant is due primarily to Wikipedia’s reach. According to its entry on itself, Wikipedia, launched on Jan. 15, 2001, “is the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet, ranking seventh globally among all websites . . . having an estimated 365 million readers worldwide.”

The name “is a portmanteau of wiki, from the Hawaiian word meaning ‘fast’ or ‘quick,’ and encyclopedia.”

The freewebsite is edited collaboratively by volunteers around the world, and contains “30 million articles in 287 languages.” It is commonly accepted that “almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone having access to the site.”While this is true, what is not mentioned is that the edits to “sensitive” entries will be removed, regularly.

As the web editor for AMERICAN FREE PRESS, part of this writer’s duties is to post select articles from the newspaper on www.AmericanFreePress.net.

When selected for the website, all articles must be accompanied by Internet source links, in order to enhance the quality of the information provided there. It was during this process of placing an article by AFP on World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein’s unsuccessful bid “to recover billions of dollars from two airlines whose planes were used in the . . . attacks,” even after he “already received $4.55 billion in an insurance settlement,” that the extent of the censorship on Wikipedia came to light.

This writer attempted to edit theWikipedia entry for Silverstein, who “in 1980 won a bid . . . to construct 7 World Trade Center [WTC7],” and also won the bid when theWTC was put up for lease in 2000.

“Silverstein . . . signed the lease on July 24, 2001,” just 45 days before the attacks that prompted America’s endless wars and current police state.

While examining the Wikipedia entry for Silverstein, it was noted that the Sept. 11 attacks section made no mention of the Jewish real estate mogul’s reference on a PBS documentary to initiate a controlled demolition on WTC7, which this writer found odd, and a fact quite necessary to gaining a fuller understanding of who was behind the attacks.

The paragraph I tried to post stated:

In an interview for the PBS documentary “America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero,” Silverstein explained that after consulting with the New York City fire department commander regarding WTC Building 7, which was not attacked on 9-11, they made the decision to “pull it”—a term which implied they decided to take down the building using controlled demolitions.

Although Silverstein admitted on camera that he orderedWTC7 demolished, this “minor edit,” while completely accurate, was removed after it was posted and then reposted several times. This back and forth ultimately resulted in this writer being warned and then blocked from editing the online encyclopedia.

This one bit of factual information, so vital to understanding this seminal event in American history, remains shrouded from the easy glance of the millions of eyes who trust Wikipedia.

The lesson to be learned fromthe above is clear: Although the Internet can be a wonderful resource for information, it is also rife with censorship in topics that threaten the powers-that-be.

——

Dave Gahary, a former submariner in the U.S. Navy, is the host of AFP’s “Underground Interview” series. See www.americanfreepress.net for more.

À propos du 9/11 et d'Israël:

"THE 9/11 EFFECT

If the Holocaust and the creation of the Jewish state jointly marked the first great turning point in the modern history of Anti-Semitism, 9/11 marked the second. Following the attacks, supporters of Israel spoke of a silver lining: The war against militant Islam suddenly was a global one. Now, the whole world would see and understand the sort of nihilistic hatred that Israelis confronted everyday."

"America's fight became Israel's fight. Over the last decade, a period during which Republicans and Democrats have fought over every other subject imaginable, support for Israel has remained one of the few issues to attract virtually unanimous bipartisan support."

"Among warhawks on the Right in particular, the sudden identification of militant Islam as America's greatest enemy cast a startling transformation in the perception of the American Jewish community. Whereas Jews might once have treathened the American Right in their roles as Communists, Anarchists, Trade Unioners, Civil Rights leaders and Ivy League intellectuals, no Jew could ever be an islamist. Just the opposite: the Jew was the perfect anti-Islamist, whose zeal and reliability in the war on terrorism was hard-wired into his political DNA, thanks to six decades of israeli warfare against islamic terrorists in the Middle East. For the first time in the history of western civilisation, the Jews' 'foreignness' and mixed-loyalties -- to the United States, Israel and world Jewry -- became a source of respect and trust rather than suspicion."

"The September 11th attacks changed America in a thousand different ways. Perhaps the most ironic, given the terrorists' intensely Anti-Semitic ideology, was that it cemented the long process leading to the Jews' full-fledged ascension into the America establishment. "

-- "Among the Truthers", Jonathan Kay

Sur ce blog: