Forbes Israël a identifié les personnes juives les plus riches dans le monde, avec les estimations du site, jusqu'à 165 des milliardaires de la planète en 2013 ont des antécédents juifs. Leur richesse commune totalise plus de 800 milliards de dollars selon le magazine d'affaires.
Larry Ellison, le PDG du centre de technologie Oracle est en tête de liste, avec une valeur nette de 43 milliards de dollars. Il est le troisième homme le plus riche des Etats-Unis. Oracle est le troisième fournisseur de logiciels informatiques avec Microsoft et IBM.
Le Maire de New York, Michael Bloomberg prend la deuxième place dans la liste Forbes. Bloomberg, qui est censé posséder 27 milliards de dollars, détient l'empire financier Bloomberg, très bien côté, qui représente un tiers de l'ensemble du marché mondial des données financières.
Suivant sur la liste, le magnat des casinos Sheldon Adelson pour un total de 26,5 milliards de dollars, dont l'empire du jeu, s'étend de Las Vegas à Macao, avec des plans en préparation pour la station de EuroVegas près de Madrid, en Espagne. EuroVegas comprendra six casinos, trois terrains de golf, 17 théâtres et bien plus encore.
Les fondateurs de Google, Larry Page et Sergey Brin figurent également dans le top dix, à la fois avec une valeur nette de plus de 22 milliards de dollars. Page et Brin, que l'on voit ici avec le président israélien Shimon Peres, sont à l'origine de la création de l'une des entreprises technologiques les plus innovantes au monde, qui inclut YouTube et Gmail.
Un autre gourou de la technologie juive est le fondateur de Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, qui se trouve à la 16ème place sur la liste des juifs les plus riches. Alors que sa fortune a baissé à 13,3 milliards de dollars à cause du lancement de l'action qui a échoué, Facebook reste le principal acteur sur le marché des médias sociaux.
Thursday, April 25, 2013 Oracle CEO heads Forbes Israel list of Jewish billionaires
http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/68433/oracle-ceo-heads-forbes-israel-list-of-jewish-billionaires/
Oracle CEO Larry Ellison heads a list of 165 Jewish billionaires, Forbes Israel reported.
According to the Hebrew magazine, which released its list on April
18, the Silicon Valley entrepreneur has a net worth of $43 billion, up
$7 billion from last year. Ellison was fifth on the Forbes 2013 list of
world billionaires.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg was second on the Forbes Israel list
with $27 billion, up $5 billion from 2012. He appeared 13th on the
world list.
Sheldon Adelson, the Las Vegas–based casino mogul and philanthropist,
was third with $26.5 billion and was 15th on the world list.
Eight of the top 10 on the Forbes Israel list of the world’s
billionaires are from the United States; the remaining two are Russians.
Rounding out the top 10 are Google’s Larry Page and Sergey Brin, $23
billion and $22.5 billion, respectively; Carl Icahn, $20 billion; George
Soros, $19.2 billion; Alisher Usmanov, $17.6 billion; Mikhail Fridman,
$16.5 billion; and Len Blavatnik, $16 billion. — jta
The illustration is the cover of Forbes Israel. The
date is April 2013. It just hit the net. The
title is "The Billionaires." The banner on the right
says, "Special Edition, 165 Jewish billionaires, 17
Israelis, 16 [Jewish] women, 812 cumulative billions (of
billionaires' wealth)."
That's 165 out of a total of 1426 billionaires in the world, or 11%.
One of us (Phil) likes to write about the new position of Jews
sociologically: and out of the 50 richest people in
the world, about a quarter are Jewish. Most of those
Jewish billionaires appear to be American, though this is an Israeli
publication.
Power and money go together, of course. The sell-line above the logo
reads: "Billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov plans to replace Putin as the most
powerful person in Russia." And the article features Sheldon Adelson at
#3, the man who bankrolled Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney and skewed our
political debate last year way right.
The coverboy for Israel Forbes is Ron Lauder (Estee Lauder's son
-- number 60 among Jews, # 376 in the world). They have
an interview with him. His quote in blue says,
"Only if we talk with the Palestinians will we able
to make progress." Cute. This guy has always been a
right-winger.
According to the Hebrew article which Ira read and will bookmark here
for safekeeping, of the 29 billionaires globally who are under 40,
"20% are Jewish." (That's 5.8 people. For a big
shot money mag, maybe they should be more exact.)
Here and here
are two English links. The Jerusalem Post is the
first link. It provides a translation of the Forbes
Israel (Hebrew page).
Of the 1,426 billionaires around the globe, 165 of them are Jews, and
their joint wealth reaches the incredible amount of $812 billion...
Compared with last year, the joint wealth of the 165 Jewish
billionaires has grown substantially.
The Forbes Israel page lists the 165 with a bunch of interesting information. Sheldon Adelson is number three among Jews -- 15th richest in el mundo--
after Larry Ellison and Michael Bloomberg. Mark Zuckerberg is a lowly
16. Michael Dell is number 12. (Without even knowing this vital
information, Ira has been a loyal customer of his
since buying his first computer over 20 years ago.)
We wonder what kind of run the U.S. Jewish press will give this. Well, already, Adam Weinstein at Gawker reported it but in a dismissive manner. His take is, OK crazies, use this for your antisemitic theories. The Forward has a breaking news notice. It sources the story to Hebrew Forbes, and says that they broke out the Jewish rich guys.
Ultimately this is a story about power, and about telling and/or
not telling a truth which is in many ways inconvenient. Yes, it could
foster anti-Semitism, but the Israeli Forbes issue also indicates the
hubris about pro-Israel financial clout that is itself part of the
problem.
P.S. Israeli Forbes is not a translation of the American Forbes; here is the bland American Forbes treatment of the 1426 billionaires.
Désinformation, diversion, ingénierie sociale... voilà ce qui tuera le mouvement de vérité!
Après l'attentat de Boston, les médias contrôlés font leur travail de dissimulation, les conspirationnistes contrôlés aussi: Alex Jones
s'est empressé de sortir sa théorie de la piste saoudienne! Bref, pour ceux qui n'ont pas compris, Alex Jones dit que
"c'était les musulmans"! (Une variante à peine différente de la
version officielle qui conclut à tout coup que "c'était les musulmans!") Et Obama serait coupable d'avoir essayé de cacher ça! (C'est les néocons qui vont être contents: eux aussi ils veulent la peau du "musulman" Obama.) Les sources d'infowars sont deux propagandistes sionistes anti-Islam: Steve EMERSON et Michael SAVAGE.
According to terrorism expert Steve Emerson, 20-year-old
Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, the Saudi national first suspected of being
involved in Monday’s twin bomb attack, is being hastily deported.
Alharbi was put under armed guard in hospital after the bombing, was
visited by Saudi diplomat Azzam bin Abdel Karim, and later had his
apartment raided by federal and state law enforcement agents.
“I just learned from my own sourcesthat he is now going
to be deported on national security grounds next Tuesday, which is very
unusual,” Emerson told Fox News last night.(...)
“That’s very interesting because this is the way things
are done with Saudi Arabia. You don’t arrest their citizens. You deport
them, because they don’t want them to be embarrassed and that’s the way
we appease them,” Emerson told host Sean Hannity.(...)
Radio host Michael Savagefloated the theory yesterday that
the Boston police were told to cancel the press conference by the Obama
administration and the FBI, because the Saudi Foreign Minister demanded
that the suspect be allowed to leave the country.
La nouvelle du Saoudien
déporté s'est avérée fausse, ce qui ne l'a pas empêché d'être reprise par Emerson
et Savage ainsi que par d'autres propagandistes sionistes en croisade anti-Islam
tels que Robert SPENCER et Pamela GELLER (tous deux juifs) et Glenn Beck. Il ne manquait plus que Daniel Pipes (Mise à jour 27 avril: Education by Murder in Boston, par Daniel Pipes).
Ce qui est sûr, donc, c'est que le Mossad travaille activement à la
propagande en vue de manipuler l'opinion publique à travers les médias contrôlés (qui, tout compte fait, existent seulement pour
servir de tribune à ces menteurs professionnels) pour justifier d'envoyer nos jeunes à la guerre pour servir de chair au profit des intérêts sionistes.
Good thing, we should’ve deported their sand nigger asses the minute
after 9/11 or took the same actions. I don’t care if I’m racist I’m
looking out for the security of my own country. The nigger we have in
office is too “politically correct” to make any difference. Jesus Christ
what is the world coming to.
L'idée
que nombre d'attaques « terroristes » sont en réalité perpétrées par
des agences de renseignement gouvernementales n'est pas un concept
nouveau (à Sott.net, cela fait dix ans que nous tentons de mettre en
lumière les preuves de la complicité du gouvernement dans le
« terrorisme islamique », par exemple). Ce qui est nouveau, c'est l'idée
que ces attaques terroristes inspirées ou perpétrées par le
gouvernement sont d'une façon ou d'une autre doublement « bidon » dans
le sens où certains détails (voire tous les détails) de l'attaque n'ont
en réalité pas vraiment eu lieu. L'idée est que l'attaque était non
seulement bidon au sens où le gouvernement - et non des « terroristes
musulmans » ou des « terroristes du pays » - était responsable, mais
aussi au sens où les apparentes victimes étaient également bidon, leurs
rôles, lorsque nécessaire, étant assurés par des « acteurs » travaillant
vraisemblablement pour le gouvernement. L'allégation selon laquelle des
« acteurs de crise » auraient été utilisés à la place de vraies
victimes a été faite à propos de la fusillade de Sandy Hook en Décembre
2012, des plus récents attentats du marathon de Boston, et même de
l'agression au couteau d'un soldat britannique, le 22 mai, à Londres.
Je suis pratiquement sûr que la moitié de la planète a vu cette photo.
The dominant reactions to the
horrific bombings on April 15th, the day of the running of the Boston
Marathon, as well as the celebration of Patriots Day, have been so far:
compassion for the victims, a maximal resolve to track down the
perpetrators, a pundit’s notebook that generally agrees that Americans
have been protected against terrorist violence since 9/11 and that the
best way to prevail against such sinister adversaries is to restore
normalcy as quickly as possible. In this spirit, it is best to avoid
dwelling on the gory details by darkly glamorizing the scene of mayhem
with flowers and homage. It is better to move forward with calm resolve
and a re-commitment to the revolutionary ideals that midwifed the birth
of the American nation. Such responses are generally benevolent,
especially when compared to the holy war fevers espoused by national
leaders, the media, and a vengeful public after the 9/11 attacks that
also embraced Islamophobic falsehoods. Maybe America has become more
poised in relation to such extremist incidents, but maybe not. It is
soon to tell, and the somewhat hysterical Boston dragnet for the
remaining at large and alive suspect does suggest that the wounds of
9/11 are far from healed.
For one thing, the scale and drama of
the Boston attack, while great, was not nearly as large or as
symbolically resonant as the destruction of the World Trade Center and
the shattering of the Pentagon. Also, although each life is sacred, the
magnitude of tragedy is somewhat conveyed by numbers, and the Marathon
incident has so far produced three deaths as compared to three thousand,
that is, 1/1000th of 9/11. Also important, the neocon presidency of
George W. Bush was in 2001, prior to the attacks, openly seeking a
pretext to launch a regime-changing war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq,
and the 9/11 events, as interpreted and spun, provided just the
supportive domestic climate needed for launching an aggressive war
against the Baghdad regime. The Iraq War was undertaken despite the UN
Security Council failure to lend its authority to such an American
deadly geopolitical venture and in the face of the largest anti-war
global demonstrations in human history. In 2001, the preferred American
grand strategy, as blueprinted by the ideologues of the American
Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution, was given a green light
by the Bush/Cheney White House even in the face of the red lights
posted both at the UN and in the streets of 600 or more cities around
the world.
Although there are many distressing
continuities that emerge if the Obama presidency is appraised by
comparison with the counter-terrorist agenda of his predecessors, there
are also some key differences of situation and approach. Obama came to
Washington as outspoken opponent of torture and of the Iraq War. He also
arrived after the failed wars of Afghanistan and Iraq, which had
devastated two countries, seemingly beyond foreseeable recovery, while
adding nothing to American security, however measured. These unlawful
wars wasted trillions expended over the several years during which many
Americans were enduring the hardships and pain of the deepest economic
recession since the 1930s. In other words, temporarily at least, the
Beltway think tanks and the government are doing their best to manage
global crises without embarking on further wars in a spirit of
geopolitical intoxication that was hallmark of the unipolar moment that
was invoked by Republicans to chide the Clinton presidency for its
wimpish failure to pursue American strategic interests in the Middle
East. Remember, as well, that this was the period of quick victorious
wars that were also cheap when measured by casualties or resources. The
Gulf War of 1991 and the NATO Kosovo War of 1999 were the poster
children of this supposed revolution in warfare that enabled the United
States and its allies to fight ‘zero casualty wars.’ At least it seems
that for the present irresponsible and unlawful warfare are no longer
the centerpiece of America’s foreign policy, as had become the case in
the first decade of the 21st century, although this is far from a
certainty. The war drums are beating at this moment in relation to both
North Korea and Iran, and as long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of
the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and
justice in the world should not rest easy.
Aside from the dangers and
unacceptability of promiscuous wars, there are other serious
deficiencies in how the United States sees itself in the world. We
should be worried by the taboo at this moment of 24/7
self-congratulatory commentary imposed on any type of self-scrutiny by
either the political leadership or the mainstream media. Unlike the
aftermath of 9/11, there are a few hopeful signs of awakening to this
one-eyed vision on the part of the citizenry. Listening to a PBS program
hours after the Boston event, I was struck by the critical attitudes of
several callers to the radio station: “It is horrible, but we in this
country should not be too surprised, given our drone attacks that have
killed women and children attending weddings and funerals in Afghanistan
and Pakistan.” Another caller asked, “Is this not a kind of retribution
for torture inflicted by American security forces acting under the
authority of the government, and verified for the world by pictures of
the humiliation of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib?” And another asked,
“In light of the authoritative reports of officially sanctioned torture
as detailed in the 577 page report of a task force chaired by two former
senators, one a Republican, the other a Democrat, and containing senior
military and security officials, has not the time come to apply the law
to the wrongdoers during the Bush presidency?” Can we not expect one
among our politicians, other than the Tea Party darling Rand Paul, to
have the courage to connect some of these dots? Should we not all be
meditating on W.H. Auden’s haunting line: “Those to whom evil is done/do
evil in return”?
The American global domination project
is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.
In some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to
experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if
there is no disposition to rethink US relations to others in the world,
starting with the Middle East. Some of us naively hoped that Obama’s
Cairo speech of 2009 was to be the beginning of such a process of
renewal, and although timid in many ways, it was yet possessed of a
tonality candidly acknowledged that relations with the Islamic world
needed fundamental moves by the US Government for the sake of
reconciliation, including the adoption of a far more balanced approach
to the Palestine/Israel impasse. But as the months passed, what became
evident, especially given the strong pushback by Israel and its
belligerent leader, Bibi Netanyahu, were a series of disappointing
reactions by Obama, which could be described as an accelerating
backpedaling in relation to opening political space in the Middle East.
Now at the start of his second
presidential term, it seems that Obama has given up altogether,
succumbing to the Beltway ethos of Israel First. Obama has acknowledged
the constraints on his freedom to maneuver on these foreign policy
issues, and seeks to confine his legacy ambitions to such domestic
concerns as immigration, gun control, and health care. In so doing, he
is virtually abandoning the international agenda except to manage crisis
diplomacy in ways that do not disturb the global status quo or weaken
America’s global reach. Obama’s March trip to Israel was highlighted by
his March 21st speech in Jerusalem, which was delivered as a love letter
to the Israeli public rather than qualifying as a good faith effort to
demonstrate his belief in a just peace. Such obsequious diplomacy was a
disappointment even to those of us with low expectations in what the
White House is willing to overcome the prolonged ordeal of the
Palestinian people.
Aside from the tensions of the moment,
self-scrutiny and mid-course reflections on America’s global role is
long overdue. Such a process is crucial both for the sake of the
country’s own future security and also in consideration of the wellbeing
of others. Such adjustments will eventually come about either as a
result of a voluntary process of self-reflection or through the force of
unpleasant events. How and when this process of reassessment occurs
remains a mystery. Until it does, America’s military prowess and the
abiding confidence of its leaders in hard power diplomacy makes the
United States a menace to the world and to itself. Such an observation
is as true if the more avowedly belligerent Mitt Romney rather than the
seemingly dovish Barack Obama was in the White House. Such bipartisan
support for maintaining the globe-girdling geopolitics runs deep in the
body politic, and is accompanied by the refusal to admit the evidence of
national decline. The signature irony is that the more American decline
is met by a politics of denial, the more rapid and steep will be the
decline, and the more abrupt and risky will be the necessary shrinking
of the global leadership role so long played by the United States. We
should be asking ourselves at this moment, “How many canaries will have
to die before we awaken from our geopolitical fantasy of global
domination?”
Blowback Will Continue to Haunt the United States
• Jewish professor vilified for saying U.S. policy provokes terrorism
By Michael Collins Piper
for American Free Press
One
of America’s most outspoken academics is under fire again, once more
accused of “anti-Semitism”—even though he’s Jewish—and charged with
being “anti-American.” Dr. Richard Falk’s latest crime is having
suggested the Boston Marathon incident was a result of the misconduct of
U.S. foreign policy.
The late Chalmers Johnson, another harsh critic
of American global adventurism—often referred to as the New World
Order—famously described such unpleasant consequences as “blowback.”
Falk sees a great deal of blowback ahead unless drastic changes are
soonmade in the direction of U.S. policy.
Earlier, Falk upset many by
writing the foreword to the hotly controversial book by Dr. David Ray
Griffin—The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush
Administration and 9-11—which raised serious questions about the U.S.
government’s version of 9-11.
Addressing the government contention
that the Boston bombing was the work of two young Muslims dissatisfied
with American policy, Falk took a broad-ranging view of U.S. global
relations and predicted a bleak future if things continue on the course
they have during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
One Jewish academician is under fire for suggesting that America’s foreign policy results in more terrorism.
Writing
in Foreign Policy Journal on April 21, Falk slammed what he called “the
American global domination project”—and concluded it is “bound to
generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.” In fact,
he said, “in some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to
experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if
there is no disposition to rethink U.S. relations to others in the
world, starting with the Middle East.”
Falk summarized the
consequences of what he referred to as “the failed wars” in Afghanistan
and Iraq. Not only did those wars devastate those countries, while
adding nothing to American security, but, he pointed out, “these
unlawful wars wasted trillions expended over the several years during
which many Americans were enduring the hardships and pain of the deepest
economic recession since the 1930s.”
Republicans—typically—are up in
arms over Falk’s assessment, demanding Falk be ousted from his UN post,
but the no-nonsense professor has not spared Obama from criticism
either.
Referring to what he calls Obama’s “obsequious diplomacy” and
“backpedaling” in dealing with Israel, Falk said that although some at
first saw signs Obama might be moving to put a brake on Israel, “it
seems that Obama has given up altogether, succumbing to the Beltway
ethos of ‘Israel first’.”
While Obama and the American foreign policy
elite initially appeared to be moving away from “irresponsible and
unlawful warfare” as “the centerpiece of America’s foreign policy”—the
hallmark of the George W. Bush era—this is unfortunately, in Falk’s
estimation, “far from a certainty.”
Right now, noted Falk, “the war
drums are beating . . . in relation to both North Korea and Iran, and as
long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political
establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should
not rest easy.”
Noting that “bipartisan support for maintaining the
globe-girdling geopolitics runs deep in the body politic, and is
accompanied by the refusal to admit the evidence of national decline,”
Falk contended that “the signature irony is that the more America’s
decline is met by a politics of denial, the more rapid and steep will be
the decline, and the more abrupt and risky will be the necessary
shrinking of the global leadership role so long played by the United
States.”
Despite media and government elites continuing to defend
American globalism, Falk sees some signs that grassroots Americans are
waking up to the dangers and are beginning a “long-overdue” reflection
on America’s role in the world.
——
Michael Collins Piper is an
author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in
Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the
author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War,
Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share
the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
Wikipedia - Blowback (intelligence) Blowback is unintended consequences of a covert operation
that are suffered by the civil population of the aggressor government.
To the civilians suffering the blowback of covert operations, the effect
typically manifests itself as “random” acts of political violence
without a discernible, direct cause; because the public—in whose name
the intelligence agency acted—are ignorant of the effected secret attacks that provoked revenge (counter-attack) against them.[1] Etymology
Originally, blowback was CIA
internal coinage denoting the unintended, harmful consequences—to
friendly populations and military forces—when a given weapon is used
beyond its purpose as intended by the party supplying it. Examples
include anti-Western religious figures (e.g. Osama bin Laden)
who, in due course, attack foe and sponsor; right-wing
counter-revolutionaries who sell drugs to their sponsor’s civil populace
(see CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking in the US); and banana republic juntas (see Salvadoran Civil War) who kill American reporters or nuns (e.g. Dorothy Kazel).[citation needed]
In formal, print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953, the CIA internal history of the US’s 1953 Iranian coup d'état, published in March 1954.[2][3]
The Boston Massacre–On March 5, 1770, it was the British killing Americans…
On April 15, 2013, it was the Yiddish
killing Americans, for the purpose of terrorizing a people back into the
Islamophobic frame of mind necessary if America is to fight 100 years’
worth of wars for the benefit of the Jewish state, just as Netanyahu
recently quipped.
We are joined by the one and only Michael Collins Piper.
Boston Marathon Bombing a ‘Bibi’ operation as a follow up to his threats made on the floor of the UN General Assembly in Sept.
We are joined by Dr. Hesham Tillawi of ‘Current Issues’. Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
AFP RADIO - Date with a Debate: Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend AFP Radio Network DownloadDefault playerNew WindowEmbed
Dave Gahary moderates a debate
between Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend, who tackle the
controversy surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event. Michael Collins Piper
is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken
in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
James H. Fetzer,
a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at U of M
Duluth, and an authority on the JFK assassination, 9/11, and Sen.
Wellstone's death.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder, his latest books
include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy
(2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Jim is a contributor and editor at Veterans Today and hosts a radio show, "The Real Deal", M/W/F
John Friend is a writer who maintains a blog and hosts “The Realist Report.”
Operation Ouroboros: Boston suspect linked to newspaper that exposes false flag operations
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
In a front page story in today’s edition of the Wall Street Journal, the alleged Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev is linked to the populist, right wing newspaper, American Free Press, a national weekly which exposes government black ops.Strange that a terrorist would be subscribing to a newspaper that warns
its readers that terrorism is too often a US government false flag
operation against its own people.
The report, in the August 6, 2013 Wall Street Journal, titled "Bombing
Suspect Steeped in Conspiracies," brings us full circle, with the
serpent consuming its own tail by pointing to its unmasking in the pages
of the American Free Press -- daring us to act on the
directional signal it is providing about itself -- and if we do not,
then the serpent's coils are made exponentially tighter as it grips our
hearts and minds.(...)
Sheik Down: How Arabs Own Everything by Alex Jones
High-Level Intriguers Behind Recent Barrage of Anti-Muslim Propaganda
Michael Collins Piper for American Free Press
Conspiracy theories about Muslims are taking hold within the patriot movement. Especially pernicious are heated claims about a “rising Muslim tide” and Muslim “sharia law” gaining a grip on the West.
While most patriots realize the official version of 9-11—that it was the work of Muslim fanatics—is a lie, many still inexplicably believe Zionist propaganda about sharia and an impending Muslim invasion.
These images are designed to inflame Americans against Muslims and make Americans all the more ready to fight wars against Iran and Syria or any Muslim country perceived to be a threat to Israel.
A little background regarding the current wave of rumors is appropriate, demonstrating precisely where these scurrilous stories first appeared. They are the latest incarnation of an insidious war-mongering mantra perpetuating the theme that a “clash of civilizations” between Muslims and the West is looming and must be fought—even if by nuclear arms.
The concept of a “clash of civilizations” was first publicly enunciated by a Jewish pro-Israel anti-Muslim propagandist, Bernard Lewis (an asset of British intelligence), in an elite academic publication, The Middle East Journal in 1956 and later in his 1964 book, The Middle East and the West. Lewis revived his theme in “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” a frequently cited article in the September 1990 Atlantic Monthly, then owned by billionaire Mortimer Zuckerman, for several years chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
However, it was Samuel Huntington, a member of the inner circle of the Rockefeller-controlled Trilateral Commission and a longtime figure at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—the New York affiliate of the Rothschild dynasty’s Royal Institute for International Affairs in London—who popularized the term “clash of civilizations.”
In a widely touted article in the summer 1993 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs, and later in a much-reviewed 1996 book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Huntington brought the “clash” into popular parlance, despite its origins in Jewish propaganda.
In 2004, in his book Who Are We?—the CFR man urged blocking certain groups—not justMuslims but also Hispanic Catholics—from coming into the United States, this in the name of “fighting terrorism and anti-Semitism,” reflecting a widespread, often cited belief by Jewish leaders, in particular, that Muslims and Hispanics are not in tune with Jewish concerns and not easily controlled politically.
These provocative rhetorical flourishes have hit home and many people are buying into the propaganda against Muslims and their alleged drive to seize power in America.
Recently, one pro-Israel voice—Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)—tried to exploit legitimate concerns about the push for gun control by claiming Americans need their guns to fight the rise of sharia in U.S. soil, a back-door way to trick Second Amendment advocates into fearing Muslims and to even be prepared to shoot them.
So, then, what about the Muslim population explosion we keep hearing about? Well, it’s not happening.
Although it’s not been widely reported, a recent study by a leading demographer, Nicholas Eberstadt, contradicts everything pro-Israeli agitators claim about the matter. And Eberstadt is no liberal advocate of multiculturalism. Instead, he’s associated with the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute.
David Ignatius—a respected journalist who often counters Israeli lobby propaganda—recently described Eberstadt’s study:
Using data for 49 Muslim-majority countries and territories, he found that fertility rates declined an average of 41 percent between 1975-80 and 2005-10, compared with a 33 percent decline for the world as a whole. Twenty-two Muslim countries and territories had fertility declines of 50 percent or more. . . . Fertility in Iran declined an astonishing 70 percent
over the 30-year period, which Eberstadt says was “one of the most rapid and pronounced fertility declines ever recorded in human history. . . .” Big cities in the Muslim world have seen especially sharp drops. . . .
In fact, said Eberstadt, “Fertility decline over the past generation has been more rapid in the Arab states than virtually anywhere else on Earth.”
None of this is new to those in the know. On Jan.27, 2011 The New York Times let its readership in on the big secret that the Muslim population was not accelerating exponentially in the United States or Europe or even around the world.
Commenting on The Future of the Global Muslim Population, a report by the PewResearch Center, the Times advised that “predictions that Europe will become a majority Muslim ‘Eurabia’ are unfounded,” pointing out that during the next 20 years the world’s Muslim population is projected to increase from 23.4 percent to 26.4 percent—hardly an explosion—and noting “such growth is not enough to create a drastic shift in the world’s religious balance.”
Pew found that Muslims in Europe, now 6 percent of the population, will grow only to 8 percent by 2030. The Times noted: “In France and Belgium, Muslims will be about 10 percent of the population in 20 years, and in Britain, 8 percent.” In the United States, within 20 years Muslims will constitute 1.7 percent of the population.
As far as the growing nationwide fear of sharia grabbing control of America, it was again The New York Times that admitted on July 31, 2011 that, in fact, a small, well-financed clique of pro-Israel intriguers were the source of the agitation.
The Times reported that David Yerushalmi, described as a “Hasidic Jew,” was the central player promoting sharia hysteria and that he had “come to exercise a striking influence over American public discourse about sharia.” The Times made it clear there was nothing “grass roots” about the new concern about sharia:
Working with a cadre of conservative public policy institutes and former military and intelligence officials, Mr. Yerushalmi has written privately financed reports, filed lawsuits against the government and drafted the model legislation that recently swept through the country—all with the effect of casting sharia as one of the greatest threats to American freedom since the Cold War.
This acknowledgement by the Times should have embarrassed those who parrot the anti-Muslim rhetoric of Yerushalmi and his collaborators, the foremost of whom is Frank Gaffney, a longtime advocate for Israel in high-level Washington circles.
Closely associated with at least four people who have been investigated by the FBI on suspicion of espionage for Israel, Gaffney was a founder of the pro-Israel Project for the New American Century, which declared a “new Pearl Harbor” could energize popular support for American military meddling around the globe. In fact, the 9-11 attacks—attributed to “the Muslims”—provided that new Pearl Harbor.
This phenomenon is not exclusive to the United States. Across Europe, a shocking number of Europeans—often called “nationalists”—are adopting anti-Muslim rhetoric and declaring Israel an ally. They include: Nick Griffin of the British National Party; Marine Le Pen of the French National Front, who says her movement is “Zionistic”; GeertWilders of the Dutch Freedom Party; and Filip Dewinter of the Belgian Vlaamas Belang Party. In September 2005, Dewinter said: “Israel is a sort of outpost for our Western society, an outpost of democracy, of freedom of speech, of protecting common values within a hostile environment.”
In truth, however, Israel has razed Christian holy sites, destroyed ancient Christian relics and instituted laws punishing Christians for proselytizing.
While refusing to acknowledge that Muslims revere Christ as a beloved prophet, Dewinter and like-minded “nationalists” ignore anti-Christian hostility that is an article of faith in Israel and documented by modern Jewish scholars in such works as Jesus in the Talmud by Dr. Peter Schafer and Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence by Dr. Elliot Horowitz.
There’s no doubt about it: Zionist propaganda against Muslims is rising in influence in the world today, despite the fact it’s founded on lies—another sign patriots need to be ever wary and on alert.
——
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in theWhite House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
American Free Press Internet Rife With Disinformation • “ Cyber shills” working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers
BEHIND THE SCENES Michael Collins Piper
Evidence suggests patriots and truthseekers are being subjected to insidious
means of mind control—and crowd control—through a covert campaign now
being orchestrated across the Internet.
Consider this: Right after 9-11, AFP correspondent Victor Thorn demonstrated that the U.S. government version of what happened to United Flight
93 on 9-11 was an absolute lie, and that the plane
was deliberately shot down by the government.
Yet, today, there is an ongoing push to flood the
Internet and independent media with a never-before-seen genre of thought that holds, essentially,
that nothing reported in the establishment press is
“for real”—that every traumatic event is, to one degree or another, a big hoax.
Here’s the problem: Had this mindset held sway
after 9-11, it would have been alleged there never
even was a United Flight 93, that it neither crashed
nor was shot down and that those who died on the
plane never existed and that their survivors (and
some of the witnesses interviewed by Thorn) were
paid actors—referred to as “crisis actors” in this new
genre—deployed to misdirect honest investigators.
The
Internet would have been rife with accusations that Thorn’s revelations
were actually part of
the cover-up and, as a consequence, many good
folks might have doubted AFP’s credibility.
Fortunately, most people see through such nonsense. However, this new
“meme” (that nothing is real) is catching hold among many who don’t
realize that ongoing efforts to impose this worldview—almost a cult-like
ideology—on truth seekers is a
very real conspiracy designed to undermine diligent reporting of the
type seen in AFP.
Unfortunately, many are falling into this carefully
crafted trap.
A bevy of
disinformation specialists
known as “cyber shills”—along with amateur keyboard detectives caught up
in the frenzy—are bombarding patriots with all manner of outlandish
“analysis” of photographs and videos, purporting to
“prove” some point that is invariably a total distraction from the real
facts that should be unveiled.
This does harm to the serious efforts of those
who are trying to expose the very real conspiracies
and cover-ups surrounding 9-11, the Oklahoma City
bombing, the JFK assassination, the Boston bombing and so many matters hidden behind the media
monopoly’s iron curtain of censorship.
Note: AFP is here to tell readers that there’s
more to the story of shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and at the Washington Navy Yard
and to the Boston Marathon bombing than many of
the Internet sensationalists are telling you.
In
truth, many still do not understand the big secret about Sandy Hook: In
the face of the predictable
media push for gun control following that tragedy,
there was an obvious conspiracy by Internet provocateurs to misdirect
patriots into thinking they were
fighting gun control by repeating stories that “no children died” when,
in fact, such claims made Second Amendment advocates look ridiculous.
Serious-minded Second Amendment advocates
were arguing, of course, that guns in the hands of
teachers and staff at Sandy Hook Elementary could have saved the lives of those who were massacred.
On April 28—at website newswithviews.com—respected patriot Devvy Kidd put it in perspective:
Over the past nearly two decades, every time
some horrific “event” happens, wanna-be “journalists” come out of the woodwork with their
conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing;
bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank
speculation. [These are] irresponsible people out
to make a name for themselves or to get people
to their websites. They have zero credibility and
hurt the rest of us by being lumped together
[with us]. I have debunked conspiracy theories
in the past based on documentation. I get attacked as if I’m the bad guy for pursuing the
truth. There are conspiracies and cover-ups, but
we want the truth, not speculation.
For years,
AFP has been smeared for publishing what critics call “conspiracy
theories,” which are, in fact, truthful reporting of high-level
misdeeds. Those trying to discredit revelations about the real
conspiracies do all they can to make AFP and others who expose those
conspiracies and the truth about mind control appear to be “nut jobs.”
That’s
why, in 2008, University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein—a
Barack Obama crony—issued a formal crisis management paper on
“conspiracy theories,” outlining a proposed pro- gram of what he called “cognitive infiltration” to discredit such theories, particularly those implicating Israel in 9-11.
And while such “Judas goat” operations have been going on for years, involving, for example, the FBI’s infamous ADL-assisted COINTELPRO—targeting
the Ku Klux Klan, the National States Rights Party, the Minutemen and
other dissidents—we know of one current Internet-focused scheme exposed
by Thorn in AFP. Reporting that the Israeli government pays young
Israelis $2,000 a month to troll the Internet and spread disinformation,
Thorn noted that this connivance is well coordinated:
Participants
are provided with specific scripts to use on enemies, complete with
details involving sensationalized accusations against enemies,
divide-and-conquer strategies where one individual is pitted against
another, plus a variety of distraction techniques and the
marginalization of opinions that differ from the official Jewish party
line. Other tactics include denying inconvenient facts, refusing
dialogue by sending conversations off into absurd directions, or
dishonestly manip- ulating sources to entrap a foe.
Programmed
to capture the imagination of sincere truth seekers, these
manipulations—aimed at a receptive “captive audience”—are intrigues
designed, as Thorn noted, to not only redirect debate by countering
conspiracy theories but also by inserting ridiculous disinformation into
the debate.
This further discredits any and all conspiracy theories—which happens to be the ultimate purpose of this multi-faceted effort.
Implementing
Sunstein’s treacherous mind-control agenda, crisis management experts
recognized that Internet-active truth seekers constitute a “crowd” as
defined by Gustave LeBon’s sinister study—The Crowd—a
legendary work described as having “exerted a powerful influence upon
the thought of men aiming to understand the workings of collective
behavior and of social psychology.”
Remembering
what LeBon said—“To know the art of impressing the imagination of
crowds is to know at the same time the art of governing them”— Sunstein
set in motion an Orwellian framework for both mind control and crowd
control all too visible on the Internet today.
AFP
pledges to ignore their disinformation and focus on the big picture and
continue to confront the real issues with facts, not speculation.
—— Michael Collins Piper
is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken
in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
This Nov. 20, 2011 file photo
shows TV and radio commentator Glenn Beck at the 114th Anniversary
Justice Louis Brandeis award Dinner given by the Zionist Organization of
America in New York.
À propos de ces conspirationnistes qui ont l'oeil rivé sur des détails techniques et autres diversions:
While the researchers have preoccupied themselves with how the assassination was accomplished, there has been almost no systematic thinking on why President Kennedy was killed."
--Vincent J. Salandria, Attorney Philadelphia, Pa. Based on an address at the conference of the New
England Branch of the Women's International League for Peace and
Freedom, Cambridge,
À propos du conspirationnisme nuisible, qui évite de trop insister sur
l'identité des commanditaires du crime, en focalisant par exemple sur
des détails techniques (appelés "incohérences de la version
officielle"), se propageant partout et très rapidement sur le Net,
polluant, intoxiquant le mouvement de vérité. C'est comme ça que les
contrôleurs de l'info peuvent continuer à contrôler l'info à
l'intérieur du mouvement de vérité et ce, tout en faisant passer le
mouvement de vérité pour des gens crédules et stupides (ex: théorie des
"acteurs de crise" à Boston et Sandy Hook, théorie "aucun avion au WTC"), voire même potentiellement dangereux (ex: Tsarnaev-Boston,
etc.), ça ils adorent! Les vrais "acteurs de crise" dans cette
histoire, ce sont les professionnels en gestion de crise et en
ingénierie sociale qui ont lancé ces rumeurs-intox telles que ces
théories sur les "acteurs de crise" à Boston et Sandy Hook, afin de
porter atteinte à la crédibilité mouvement de vérité...
"All of the tiny little islands of paranoia suddenly were linked up by virtual causeways. One result is that elaborate conspiracy theories now can be cobbled together literally overnight through the efforts of hundreds of scattered dilettante conspiracists. Another result is that conspiracists all around the world now tend to focus on the same few dozen talking points that figure prominently on the top websites.
The Internet has produced a radical democratization of the
conspiracist marketplace of ideas. No longer does one have to spend
years researching and writing a book to attract attention: One can
simply set up a blog, or chime in on someone else’s, with some
refinement of the existing collective lore. In fact, today’s
conspiracists don’t even have to read books — they can pick up all their
talking points from Truther websites, or, better yet, from Truther
propaganda videos. (...)
This dumbing-down effect explains the downward shift in the age
profile of conspiracists: While influential JFK conspiracy theorists
tended to be bookish middle-aged eccentrics, many of the Internet’s
noisiest Truthers are barely old enough to shave: Conspiracism is
something they fit in between video gaming and Facebook surfing.
Published in Canada by HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
"As this positive social feedback becomes addictive, the conspiracist's
network of enablers growsoften to such a point that it crowds out the
conspiracy theorist's nonbelieving friends. The process resembles the
formation of an electronic cocoon that envelops a conspiracist with codependents."
-"Among the Truthers", Jonathan Kay
Et ce sera l'homme blanc européen chrétien qui sera tenu responsable,
sûrement pas les juifs qui nous aurons tous menés à la catastrophe!
"Si demain, un Breivik « français de souche », nourri des textes
antisémites ultra-catholiques ou néo-païens énumérés ci-dessus, se prend
pour le sauveur de la civilisation blanche et/ou chrétienne et fait un
carnage, il ne faudra pas dire que nous ne savions pas." (Tarek Sandal, du site de repères antiracistes)
À propos du 9/11 et d'Israël:
"THE 9/11 EFFECT
Ifthe Holocaust and the
creation of the Jewish state jointly marked the first great turning
point in the modern history of Anti-Semitism, 9/11 marked the second. Following
the attacks, supporters of Israel spoke of a silver lining: The war
against militant Islam suddenly was a global one. Now, the whole world
would see and understand the sort of nihilistic hatred that Israelis
confronted everyday."
"America's fight became Israel's fight. Over the
last decade, a period during which Republicans and Democrats have fought
over every other subject imaginable, support for Israel has remained
one of the few issues to attract virtually unanimous bipartisan
support."
"Among warhawks on the Right in particular, the sudden
identification of militant Islam as America's greatest enemy cast a
startling transformation in the perception of the American Jewish
community. Whereas Jews might once have treathened the American Right in
their roles as Communists, Anarchists, Trade Unioners, Civil Rights
leaders and Ivy League intellectuals,no Jew could ever be an islamist.
Just the opposite: the Jew was the perfect anti-Islamist, whose zeal and
reliability in the war on terrorism was hard-wired into his political
DNA, thanks to six decades of israeli warfare against islamic terrorists
in the Middle East. For the first time in the history of western
civilisation, the Jews' 'foreignness' and mixed-loyalties -- to the
United States, Israel and world Jewry -- became a source of respect and trust rather than suspicion." "The September 11th attacks
changed America in a thousand different ways. Perhaps the most ironic,
given the terrorists' intensely Anti-Semitic ideology, was that it
cemented the long process leading to the Jews' full-fledged ascension
into the America establishment. "
_This
is guaranteed: You are about to be confronted with some harsh realities
that may be unlike you’ve ever encountered in whatever you’ve heard
about what happened at Sandy Hook school on Dec. 14 2012 and at the
Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.
_If you will be personally
offended by expressions of fact and opinion (based on fact) that may
contradict your deepest-felt beliefs regarding Sandy Hook and Boston,
then please read no further.
_We’ll say it right now—and this
will certainly astound you: Forget everything—everything—you’ve heard in
both the mainstream media and in the “alternative” media about Sandy
Hook and Boston.
_Then, after you’ve studied—if you dare—the
material we are about to explore, you’ll realize what really happened at
Sandy Hook and Boston is something unlike anything—and so very much
bigger— than even you might have imagined.
_You’ll never look at
Sandy Hook and Boston in the same way again. But you will be prepared
for whatever future “crisis” the high-level conspirators undoubtedly
have planned for America.
_As such, when that crisis happens,
you’ll be better able to see through the fog of disinformation that will
be once again unleashed— and rest assured that it will be.
In
the wake of Sandy Hook and Boston, much was heard in the
“alternative”media about “Crisis Actors” who played a part in
misdirecting people’s attention as to the real facts about what happened
during those “false flag” events.
_And false flag events they
were. Both of those tragedies were classic false flag operations, but
the truth is that they were not precisely the kind of false flag of the
type that we saw carried out in the JFK assassination, in the Oklahoma
City bombing, and later in 9-11.
_In fact, as we’ll see here—and this is the first time ever the story has been told in its entirety—the real “Crisis Actors” were not those whom many people believed them to be.
_And that is a story in and of itself.
_And it will surprise you.
_The
story is much bigger than anyone might have conceived and it points
toward the venal nature of a carefully-crafted high-level conspiracy
that bears all the ear-marks of the manipulative masters of mind control
whose not-so-fine (and ugly) hand was so clearly on the levels of power
in the murder of JFK and those mass murders that followed in Oklahoma
City and with the 9-11 terrorist tragedy.
_The vast flow of
dissident information that erupted following the events of 9-11 made it
an absolute“must” for the Mossad and its allies in intrigue to prevent
it from ever happening again.
_You see, this is old-fashioned
“crisis management” at its best (or worst).But the“crisis” in
question—as you might naturally think—is not the death of the president
or the lives lost in Oklahoma City or on 9-11.
_Rather, the
crisis—in the minds of the conspirators responsible—is the potential
danger to their power that could erupt if enough people came, for
example, to conclude that the Mossad was indeed responsible for any of
these false flag terrorist attacks on American soil.
_Therefore—in
the wake of 9-11 and the Internet frenzy that took place with the rise
of fast-moving and widely-distributed conspiracy theories (many
implicating the Mossad)—it is now clear a conscious decision was made to
ensure that, in the future, when any event of a conspiratorial nature
occurred (particularly one involving the Mossad) that those most
inclined toward acceptance of conspiracy theories would be corralled and
misdirected through the most effective means possible.
_However,
to achieve this end, it would be necessary to determine the best way to
chart the rise and course of conspiracy theories; to pinpoint precisely
who is most susceptible toward believing in them and, naturally, to do
all that could be done to discredit them.
_But the plan—as we
shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly
denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was
far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it
was a stroke of genius).
_The intriguers effectively determined
that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes). That
is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution
would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to
the mix.
_The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would
look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public
might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility.
_In
the past, people did have doubts about the official stories relating to
the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 tragedy.
Now, however, emerging alternative theories about other events would be
totally eviscerated—from within—and die by their own accord.Anyone
putting forth any form of conspiracy theory would automatically become
suspect, their very sanity questioned.
_The multiple stream of
Internet provocations that captured the imagination of the “patriot”
and“alternative” media following the Sandy Hook affair and the events in
Boston were—beyond any question—the work of high-level conspirators
whose designs were clear:
_1) To monitor the reaction of known (and potential) political dissidents to public events of a “crisis” nature;
_2) To gauge the level of conspiracy theorizing (and the acceptance of the theories) following such events;
_3)
To trace the origins of conspiracy theories and to chart their course
via Internet websites, email and other social media venues;
_4) To disrupt and misdirect conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theories whose views were deemed in some way problematic;
_and
5) To have in place a fully-functioning Crisis Management System—a very
real “conspiracy”—that could be utilized to its fullest capacity at
some future time.
_The first public hint of what was
openly-acknowledged high-level intrigue of this sort—designed to
undermine the 9-11 truth movement (not to mention any and all
suggestions of conspiracies in other realms) was formally unveiled on
January 15, 2008.
_At that time, one Cass Sunstein, a professor at
the University of Chicago, and his co-author, Harvard law professor
Adrian Vermeule, put forth a so-called “preliminary draft” of what was
officially issued as “Harvard Public LawWorking Paper No.08-03 and
University of Chicago Public LawWorking Paper No. 199.”
_Although
little-noticed at the time it was first issued, the “working paper” came
under broad-ranging public inspection (widely discussed on the
Internet) after Sunstein was drafted in 2009 by President Barack Obama
to serve as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, a post Sunstein departed in 2012.
_Later published under
other auspices under the title “Conspiracy Theories,” the paper
addressed the specific question of how the government should respond to
conspiracy theories that were now holding wide sway (particularly on the
Internet) and, in no uncertain terms, addressed what Sunstein (who is
Jewish) considered the specific danger of the growing belief that Israel
had played a part in 9-11.
_Naturally, 9-11 truthers were outraged
by this paper and noted (rightly so) that the co-author was now
effectively “minister of information” for the Obama regime: A U.S.
government official was actually pondering, in writing,how government
power could be used to deal with conspiracy theories and those who
believed in them!
_Sunstein’s insidious and Orwellian “think piece” began by raising this question:
_Should
governmental responses be addressed to the suppliers [of conspiracy
theories] with a view to persuading or silencing them, or rather be
addressed to the mass audience, with a view to innoculating them from
pernicious theories?
_While noting that, in his
view,“these two strategies are not mutually exclusive,” Sunstein went on
to suggest that “perhaps the best approach is to straddle the two
audiences with a single response or simply to provide multiple
responses.”
_However, Sunstein said,many officials considered it “an
exercise in futility” to try to respond directly to “the suppliers of
conspiracy theories” and that, instead, they tried to “address their
responses to the third-party mass audience, hoping to stem the spread of
conspiracy theories by dampening the demand rather than by reducing the
supply.”
_In answer to his own question“What can the government do about conspiracy theories?” Sunstein provided five possibilities:
_(1) Government might ban “conspiracy theories,” somehow defined.
_(2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
_(3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.
_(4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.
_(5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.
_Noting
that each of these proposals had “a distinct set of potential effects,
or costs and benefits, and each [of which] will have a place under
imaginable conditions,” Sunstein answered the specific question of “What
should government do?” by stating quite directly:
_Our
main policy claim here is that government should engage in cognitive
infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which
involves a mix of [the aforementioned proposals:] (3), (4), and (5).
_Clearly,
Sunstein recognized that—at least under the First Amendment as it
exists today—the government could not ban conspiracy theories outright
or levy some sort of tax on those who purvey such theories that he and
others find offensive.
_However, Sunstein concluded, the
government could engage in efforts to counter the theories by
recruiting“credible private parties” to combat conspiracy theoriests and
by engaging in “information communication with such parties,
encouraging them to help.”
_And this framework, in itself, is
already in place. It is a very dirty and ugly history indeed,
demonstrated by the long-standing collaboration between such groups as
the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center (not to
mention the American Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Committee)
working with the CIA and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, as
well as Israel’s Mossad—and, dare we add, British intelligence—in
concerted efforts to undermine American political dissidents.
_Working
from this standpoint Sunstein outlined what he called “a distinctive
tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy
theories.” This program, he said, involved the following:
_[C]ognitive
infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their
allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or
anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by
planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate
within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.
_Because,
Sunstein said,“conspiracy theorists are likely to approach evidence and
arguments in a biased way, they are not likely to respond well, or even
logically, to the claims of [people they know to be] public officials,”
it was vital that, as Sunstein said,“government officials would
participate anonymously or even with false identities” in 9-11
discussion groups and other conspiracy-focused gatherings on the
Internet and elsewhere.
_And with the increasingly widespread
knowledge we now have about the capacity of the National Security
Agency—among many government intelligence agencies in the United States
alone—to monitor the telephone calls, emails, and other Internet
activity of all Americans,we can certainly say, with utmost authority,
that Sunstein and his co-conspirators and like-minded intriguers had
already concluded that the framework was in place to be able to see
precisely who was engaged in conspiracy talk and with whom they were
communicating.
_It is thus no coincidence that when the series of
scandals erupted over the summer of 2013 regarding the activities of
the National Security Agency (NSA) that Cass Sunstein was one of the
four members of the so-called “independent” panel appointed by President
Barack Obama charged with the responsibility of “reviewing” the
operations of the NSA and other government agencies.
_And nor,we
might add, it is any coincidence that another member of the panel,
Richard Clarke (a former high ranking advisor to presidents—Democratic
and Republican alike—in the realm of“national security”) now happens to
head a private firm known as Good Harbor Security Risk Management.
_And yes, as you might have guessed, Good Harbor touts “Crisis Management” as one of its specialities.
_Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.
_The
concept of “Crisis Management” is the new “big thing” in our modern
era.And don’t forget—as we mentioned in Chapter Eighteen— that former
high-ranking FBI official Neil Herman who was involved in much of the
intrigues surrounding 9-11 (and who later worked as director of
“fact-finding” for Israel’s American intelligence arm, the Anti-
Defamation League) went on to become part of the “crisis management
team” at Burson-Marstellar, one of the premier firms in that field
today.
_In fact, two popular television dramas of recent date
have Crisis Management specialists at the core of their
storyline—“Scandal,” portraying the day-to-day workings of a beautiful
African-American Crisis Management operative in Washington, D.C. and
“The Good Wife,” featuring a particularly wily Crisis Management
specialist (portrayed as a distinctly Jewish figure with the name of“Eli
Gold”) who carries on his intrigues in Cass Sunstein’s home base of
Chicago, no less.
_Both programs are quite revealing and say much about the nature of Crisis Management methods of operation.
_Several
episodes of “The Good Wife” noted the use of “cyber shills” whose duty
it is to infiltrate the Internet and place false stories and
provocations designed to promote some particular agenda—or disrupt
someone else’s.
_A simple Internet search of the term “Crisis
Management”—and the term does deserve to be capitalized as we have
rendered it here— demonstrates how foremost these new techniques of
“public relations” (that is, propaganda) really are in the minds of
those in high places.
_As we said: “Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.”
_So
it was that—with the nature of Internet communication as it exists
today and with the capacity to be able to monitor any and all content
circulating on the Internet—Cass Sunstein and company had the means to
construct and carry out a rather simple (but 21st Century-style
technologically-sophisticated) exercise in Crisis Management planning
which incorporated rather skillful experimentation with that new
technology in implementing good old-fashioned Crowd Control.
And
when we talk about Crowd Control,we’re not talking about the use of
fire hoses and police dogs and stun guns. Rather, in fact, what we’re
talking about is really just a highly-advanced form of “Mind
Control”—one designed to influence a large number of people over an
extended period of time through covert and quite insidious manipulation
of the media—and that does include the Internet and the “alternative”
and “independent” media as well. Unfortunately, a brief digression into
the topic of Mind Control is relevant and important here, for it relates
directly to the nature of the manipulative experiments in False Flag
Crowd Control that were central to the Internet frenzy following both
Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Long part of the intrigues of the
high-level conspirators—best exemplified in the CIA’s infamous MK-ULTRA
experiments in Mind Control, the initial stages of which were launched
in the days following the CIA’s founding in 1947—this realm has not only
been a province of the CIA, but also that of the Soviet KGB and
Israel’s Mossad and other intelligence agencies (both public and
private)—as well.
_Now, unfortunately, although the concept of
Mind Control is best known among truth-seekers as a consequence of the
widespread distribution of such works as Cathy O’Brien’s rather dubious
book Trance-Formation of America, the truth is that there has
always been available a wide variety of responsible material on the
subject, in particular the book by former State Department foreign
service officer John D. Marks entitled The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.
_Subtitled
“The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to
Control Human Behavior,” Marks’ book was based on some 16,000 pages of
documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of
Information Act following the public revelations regarding CIA
adventures in this bizarre field that were unveiled in the wake of a
controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church
(D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA. Until then, Americans believed
that only “the Communists” and “the Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant
experiments to manipulate human behavior.
_(The title of
Marks’non-fiction book was inspired by the 1958 novel by Richard
Condon—later a popular motion picture—entitled The Manchurian Candidate.
In that horrifying story, an American soldier is brainwashed by the
communists during the KoreanWar, falsely set up as a “war hero” to be
revered by the American public, and later manipulated in an
assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
_(It
turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist
agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known
“anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist
plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting
communism.
_The mind-control victim never knows he is being
manipulated— until it is too late.) So—all of that having been said—Mind
Control is very real and can be carried out in a variety of ways.And
Crowd Control—which is a part of Crisis Management—is a form of Mind
Control. And you may rest assured that those who have in interest in
these matters have studied these concepts carefully and know precisely
how they work.
_And—as we have seen—with high-level forces having
witnessed the growth of “conspiracy theories”which these would be
masters of the universe realize endanger their power—particularly with
the rise of the Internet as a somewhat “independent”means of
communication— the need to combat those conspiracy theories (and to
control the Internet) has become a major concern.
_These very
real conspirators—people of the likes of the aforementioned Cass
Sunstein,who actually laid out a plan for undermining conspiracy
theories—determined the best way to facilitate their operation was to
orchestrate (or take advantage of) an event that would grip the public
imagination and then manipulate it for their own purposes.
_Their
goal was to have in place a carefully-structured network that, in the
future,could be used in a much-bigger fashion to direct or—as the case
may be—to misdirect public opinion (particularly in the realm of those
open to “conspiracy theories”) and ensure that the trade of information
regarding such events was carefully controlled.
_Here,
essentially,was the plan: These conspirators needed a “crisis”—a
reasonably small and manageable event they could monitor and manipulate
from the very beginning, finding out, essentially,“who’s in touch with
whom” and by what means and venues conspiracy theories (relating to such
a crisis) gained their most widespread circulation.
_Whether the
crisis was “real”—that is, of its own making, one that happened on its
own—or whether it was manufactured (through covert means by some
clandestine agency) didn’t matter.
_What mattered was the
capacity to track (and, more importantly, to direct) public reaction to
the crisis (particularly in the realm of “conspiracy theories”) and to
manage the crisis to such a degree that any and all conspiracy theories
relating to that crisis could be made to look foolish.
_And
here’s the critical point to remember: These conspirators also realized
that they could effectively redirect public debate not just by
countering conspiracy theories but by actively inserting their own
downright silly and ridiculous disinformation into the debate with the
aim of discrediting any and all conspiracy theories.
_Worthy
of the greatest thinkers of theTalmud, it was right out of the
legendary Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And it was
programmed—from the start—to capture the imagination of (and control)
the minds of sincere patriots who were already inclined (quite
naturally) to buy into conspiracy theories!
_Fully versed in the
legendary sociological study of crowd behavior laid down in 1895 by
Gustave Lebon in The Crowd—a volume described as having “exerted a
powerful influence upon the thought of men aiming to understand the
workings of collective behavior and of social psychology”—Sunstein and
company set in motion a scheme that can only be described as brilliant,
if not just simply as evil.
_To those who understand Sunstein’s
proposition on the deeper level of Mind Control that it represents and
who have likewise taken the time to carefully study the bigger picture
in retrospect, it is all too apparent that the Internet-based frenzy
following the Sandy Hook affair was clearly the work of the Sunstein
crowd—we’ll call them the Crisis Management Conspirators—who remembered
all too well what Gustave LeBon had said when he wrote so succinctly:“To
know the art of impressing the imagination of crowds is to know at the
same time the art of governing them.”
_The Sandy Hook affair was
tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It
involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control,
inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it
was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no
less.
_The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
_And,
quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically
reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the
heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and
presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
_And
naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion
among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who
were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was
accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook.
_Now
some of the errors were eventually corrected,but many of the errors
were simply ignored or otherwise lost in the shuffle, and this led to
further suspicions on the part of those who sensed that there was more
to Sandy Hook than was officially being reported.
_(Unfortunately,
although some of the errors were indeed later corrected,many so-called
“conspiracy theorists” never became aware of those corrections and
continued—even to this day—to cite those
“errors” as evidence of a cover-up.
_(And
that’s another reason conspiracy theorists must be detail-oriented, for
if they can be disproven in one minor area, those who are eager to
dismiss their theories will use that one mistake as “evidence” that the
bigger picture—the more broad-ranging so-called “conspiracy theory”—is,
in and of itself, totally wrong.)
_But note this:
_Considering
the fact Sunstein and his like-minded conspirators do have high-level
connections to the controllers of the big media, it’s likely some media
elements deliberately purveyed incomplete or imprecise stories about
Sandy Hook, knowing full well that alert readers and audiences would
detect these errors and that they would be bandied about as “proof” of a
conspiracy, further muddying the waters.And that, in fact, is what
happened in many instances.
_However, as we shall see, there is
strong evidence to suggest that at least some “inside” elements in the
mass media did play a key role in “leaking” material that was used by
the Sunstein group to distract truth seekers in the wake of Sandy Hook.
More about that later.
_But aside from the mis-reporting in the
major media (whether deliberate or otherwise) it was almost exclusively
on the Internet—via the so-called “truther” and “alternative” and
“independent” websites, discussion groups, along with email and the
popular video forum, YouTube, etc—that a wide variety of absolutely
baseless (and largely nonsensical) stories about Sandy Hook began to
appear.
_This was clearly the work of a small but skilled team of operatives working for Sunstein and company.
_As
Sunstein had suggested in his now-infamous working paper, their purpose
was to manipulate—and ultimately refute—and make fools of—sincere truth
seekers and so-called “conspiracy theorists.”
_And, even more
so, Sunstein’s goal was to convince the broad range of the American
public that anyone who spoke about any conspiracies at high levels was
just simply not someone to be believed.
_One of the first and
most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make
sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oftrepeated theme that“Sandy
Hook was a hoax”and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that
was a frequently repeated allegation.)
_Even the introduction of
the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media
reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe
the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a
lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what
happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited.
_And—just
as Sunstein and company expected (and desired)—other individuals
discussing other matters involving conspiracies (the 9-11 cover-up, the
Oklahoma bombing, the JFK assassination, and even the Israeli attack on
the U.S.S. Liberty) were themselves being subjected to sarcastic
comments such as,“I suppose you’re also one of those people who doesn’t
believe those 20 little children were killed at Sandy Hook.”
_Sunstein and company had scored big.
_They
knew they literally had a proverbial “captive audience” that was
unwittingly receptive to their manipulations. And they had the capacity
to track—via the Internet—the entirety of the exchange of information
going on.
_This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams.
_Sunstein
and the Crisis Management Conspirators implementing his plan recognized
that the diverse assortment of groups active in political dissent
—whether they call themselves “patriots” or “nationalists” or “truth
seekers” or “white separatists” (the list of such largely selfimposed
labels could go on and on)—constituted the definition of a “crowd” as
laid forth in the aforementioned Gustave LeBon’s rather sinister
analysis of the manner in which a “crowd” can be manipulated.
_In
its ordinary sense the word "crowd" means a gathering of individuals of
whatever nationality, profession, or sex, and whatever be the chances
that have brought them together.
_From the psychological point of view, the expression "crowd" assumes quite a different signification. . . .
_The
sentiments and ideas of all the persons in the gathering take one and
the same direction, and their conscious personality vanishes. A
collective mind is formed, doubtless transitory, but presenting very
clearly defined characteristics.
_The gathering has thus become .
. . an organized crowd, or, if the term is considered preferable, a
psychological crowd. It forms a single being, and is subjected to the
law of the mental unity of crowds.
_In other words,
these proverbial “mad scientists”—these modernday Crisis Management
Conspirators, steeped in the teachings of LeBon—saw that conspiracy
theories tended to form (and initially circulate) within a“crowd”of
like-minded individuals and that, from that standpoint alone, such a
crowd was easily manipulated. It was, after all, the High Priest of
Crowd Control, Le Bon himself,who pointed out that:
_However
indifferent it may be supposed, a crowd, as a rule, is in a state of
expectant attention, which renders suggestion easy. The first suggestion
formulated which arises implants itself immediately by a process of
contagion in the brains of all assembled, and the identical bent of the
sentiments of the crowd is immediately an accomplished fact.
_That
is, once a particular “theory”—some particular thought, some particular
“factoid” (as they now call it)—has been inserted into a likeminded
crowd, that factoid (even if, per chance, it doesn’t happen to be true)
almost becomes an article of faith or even, as Le Bon said, “immediately
an accomplished fact.”
_As such, the Le Bonian Mind Control
masterminds recognized that precisely because a “crowd” tends, thus, to
think alike, and accept all precepts that “sound good” or which seem
parallel to their particular mindset, that a “crowd” would immediately
incorporate by “process of contagion” any idea inserted into the mass
thinking of the crowd.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators knew
that once a “crowd” had become conditioned to “think alike” (so to
speak) and was thereby easily subject to the power of suggestion, that
such a like-minded group would immediately start to develop its own
particular mindset a way of looking at some issue or event.
_As Le Bon pointed out:
_The simplest event that comes under the observation of a crowd is soon totally transformed.
_A
crowd thinks in images, and the image itself immediately calls up a
series of other images, having no logical connection with the first. We
can easily conceive this state by thinking of the fantastic succession
of ideas to which we are sometimes led by calling up in our minds any
fact.
_Our reason shows us the incoherence there is in these
images, but a crowd is almost blind to this truth, and confuses with the
real event what the deforming action of its imagination has
superimposed thereon.
_A crowd scarcely distinguishes between the
subjective and the objective. It accepts as real the images evoked in
its mind,though they most often have only a very distant relation with
the observed fact.
_Essentially, because so many
people in “The Crowd”—that is, the “truth movement”—saw (quite clearly)
that the mass media was attempting to stoke up demands for increased gun
control measures (even outright gun confiscation on a national scale),
the whole image of Sandy Hook changed in its entirety.
_In fact, this was the REAL “false flag” in the whole Sandy Hook debate, but many good patriots didn’t see what was happening.
_Rather
than focusing on the genuine issue of specific concern—the push for gun
control—“The Crowd” was instead gettting bogged down and looking in the
wrong direction, worrying about a variety of unimportant details and
making allegations about Sandy Hook—that no children had actually died,
for example—that made honest critics of gun control look foolish, if not
downright venal.
_Most people among the general public more or
less accepted the idea that a disturbed young man had committed a
horrible deed and that—predictably—gun control advocates once again
jumped on the tragedy in order to pursue their anti-gun agenda.
_A
lot of people—including a lot of people in the “truth movement”—had
previously (and rightly) expressed concerns that many of the people
involved in previous mass shootings had been under the influence of
psychiatric drugs which have been pushed by the major media to the great
profit of the pharmeceutical conglomerates.
_And at the outset,
even most skeptics of the official version of events had no doubt buying
the possibility that the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza,had been the
victim of MK-ULTRA style mind control,brainwashed into committing a mass
shooting in order to help stampede public support for gun control or
outright gun confiscation.
_Over the years more than a few
independent journalists had compiled an assembly of data on a number of
mass shootings in the U.S. and elsewhere suggesting there was much more
to the story behind these shootings; that, in fact, they were
orchestrated by behind-the-scenes forces and that there was evidence of
“mind control” involved.
_So there were a lot of good reasons for
many to at least suspect that perhaps there was some sort of Mind
Control or other form of high-level intrigue involved in the Sandy Hook
shooting.
_In fact—up until Sandy Hook—this explanation (that
Lanza was a mind-controlled false flag patsy who actually killed little
chiildren) would have sufficed for even the most hard-core skeptic who
doubted the official version of events laid down by the authorities.
_But
with Sandy Hook—and the intervention of the Crisis Management
Conspirators—the outlook of the“average”grass-roots conspiracy theorist
in “The Crowd” would never be the same again.
_As a consequence
of the intrigues of the Crisis Management Conspirators, the mindset of
the conspiracy theorists would be drastically altered to the point that
many good people were pushed into the direction of believing that
absolutely nothing—absolutely nothing— could ever be believed and that
everything—absolutely everything— was a horrendous lie.
_And we
are not talking just about Sandy Hook.We are talking about virtually
anything—everything—taking place in our world today.
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators were pushing honest truth seekers in“The Crowd”
into a proverbial padded cell where they could just keep screaming at
the top of their voices and banging their heads against the wall with
the ultimate realization that nobody was paying any attention to them
whatsoever—a virtual Twilight Zone.
_Nonetheless—on a parallel
basis—the Crisis Management Conspirators,quite naturally,didn’t want
anyone in the general public, at least, to ever consider the possibility
that there had been any Mind Manipulation or any conspiracy to stage
a“crisis”—such as another mass shooting—to justify gun confiscation.
_Therefore,
they began spinning bizarre tales and inserting them onto the Internet
and into the mind of “The Crowd”—that is, patriots and other skeptics of
the official story—in order to muddy up serious inquiry and
discussion.
_They dazzled “The Crowd”with an array of colorful
and interesting and fiendishly clever (if not obviously outrageous)
rumors that absolutely had the immediate and profound (and very much
intended) effect of directing public ire upon those good patriots—the
so-called “conspiracy theorists”—who were rightly concerned about
behind-thescenes manipulation that accompanied the events at Sandy
Hook.
_Soon enough—and not surprisingly—people in the general
public began to think any conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook were
absolutely beyond the pale and that people inclined toward conspiracy
theories questioning the official government line were crazy
troublemakers who belonged in mental hospitals!
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and
other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that
quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites
by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting
them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the
staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute
the latest Sandy Hook “revelations.”
_And, of course, this—as we
shall see in a moment—was all keeping in line with another aspect of the
“crowd” that the “guru” of the Crisis Management Conspirators—Gustave
LeBon—had already assessed.
People were falling victim to the the
fact that because something is repeated time and again, it gains a
certain credibility in the mind of the ‘crowd.” LeBon wrote:
_The
influence of repetition on crowds is comprehensible when the power is
seen which it exercises on the most enlightened minds.
_This
power is due to the fact that the repeated statement is embedded in the
long run in those profound regions of our unconscious selves in which
the motives of our actions are forged.
_At the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.
_When
an affirmation has been sufficiently repeated and there is unanimity in
this repetition . . .what is called a current of opinion is formed and
the powerful mechanism of contagion intervenes.
_Precisely
because so much disinformation was being repeated by well-meaning and
entirely innocent folks, a lot of good patriots concluded that something
had to be amiss with the “official” Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they
said—so many good patriots on so many websites and elsewhere wouldn’t be
raising these questions. However—and this is a point that many failed
to consider at the time (but which many patriots are now coming to
realize):
_The truth is that a vast majority of the Sandy Hook
spin came from theretofore unknown sources—who to this day still remain
largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames—who helped put out
much of the material in the first place, adding often-dubious
commentary that helped stir up suspicion in the first place.
_As
LeBon had so rightly said, “at the end of a certain time we have
forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by
believing it.” How true it was with Sandy Hook!
_These Internet
sources who had suddenly popped up had no reputation (either good or
bad) among traditional patriots and conspiracy theorists—but their
impact was immeasurable.
_And they were ably aided and abetted by
some longtime deep-cover assets—agents provocateurs—inside the patriot
movement who helped give further “credibility” to these stories being
cranked out by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_A lot of old
CIA hands and federal informants---veterans of the black propaganda
journal Media Bypass (referenced in Chapter Fourteen) that had been
heavily funded and set up in time for the disinformation surrounding the
Oklahoma City bombing----popped up to help disseminate a lot of the
Sandy Hook-related nonsense that gripped the imagination of the
patriots.
_Meanwhile, on a daily basis, the powers-that-be in
control of the mass media were cranking up a continuing round-the-clock
campaign in favor of gun control,pointing at Sandy Hook as underscoring
the necessity for dismantling the Second Amendment. It was, they said,
“for the children.” Americans were told they needed to give up their
guns so as to prevent future tragedies of this kind.
_But the
irony is that many good people who thought that by“exposing the Sandy
Hook fraud”—that is, passing on the Internet-based rumors about Sandy
Hook—that they were “doing something” to stop the drive for gun control.
In fact, it was a total misdirection from the central issue of gun
control. Peoples’energies were being focused not on gun control but on
the “necessity” to “spread the truth about Sandy Hook.”
_And
that, as we’ve said,was the real“false flag” in Sandy Hook.
However,unfortunately, the patriots who were repeating the Internet
rumors were giving a whole new twist to the controversy surrounding
Sandy Hook and the push for gun control that came in its wake.
_What
was happening was that the more the conspiracy theories surrounding
Sandy Hook got all the more fantastic, the more it had the effect of
discrediting all sincere critics of gun control who were being
identified with “those people who say that no children really died at
Sandy Hook.” The bottom line matter of fighting the drive for gun
control was sidelined by “The Crowd” which had become caught up in
discussing (and perpetuating) all of the silly Sandy Hook rumors that
the Crisis Management Conspirators had unleashed on the Internet.
_The
Crisis Management Conspirators—having a field day (and a good laugh) at
their success in re-shaping the thinking of conspiracyconscious
patriots—knew full well of another key concept put forth by LeBon: The
fact that a “crowd” can accept the most ridiculous propositions, ones
that an individual—prior to becoming a member of the “crowd”—would not
be so ready to incorporate into his thinking. if given the time to
consider the matter more fully.
_More and more a fabulously
colorful bazaar of bizarre conspiracy theories began to swirl around
Sandy Hook. Many of these theories— often promulgated as part of a
grab-bag package by their promoters— were directly contradictory.
_Here’s an example.
_One
big name figured out that Israel’s Mossad was behind the shooting. His
proof? Well, everybody knows that the Mossad is murderous and that
Israel has no problem killing children.
_This authority claims a
three-man Mossad team pulled off the job— but then again, there are
folks who say this investigator is dead wrong (pun intended) since, of
course, nobody was killed at Sandy Hook at all, or least not enough
people killed to justify a big-time Mossad operation of the kind
described by that analyst.
_However, as far as the Mossad is
concerned (vis-a-vis Sandy Hook) there were two different claims in this
regard. Some said the Mossad did it to hurt President Obama, getting
revenge against the president for not being pro-Israel enough. Others
said the Mossad did it to help the president further along the
conspiracy to grab America’s guns.
_In other words, if you think
the Mossad did it, you have two entirely different (and quite
contradictory) motives to choose from. And so, depending on what you
think of Barack Obama, you have two different versions of the story that
“The Mossad Was Behind Sandy Hook.”
_But the foundation of this
theory—which is certainly delectable to anyone who has professed belief
of Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City
bombing and in 9-11—doesn’t have any basis in any given facts, the
exciting scenario itself notwithstanding.
_Yet—believe it or
not—after I publicly discounted Mossad involvement in Sandy Hook (on the
basis that I had seen no actual proof—even circumstantial—of such
involvement) I was accused of “covering up for the Mossad” and of being
“a Zionist agent.” (Seriously.)
_In fact, there is no proof that Mossad assassins were involved in any shooting (real or staged) in Sandy Hook.
_How
the Mossad was involved in Sandy Hook was in a way most of the great
conspiracy theorists clearly were unable to figure out, so busy they
were with distributing the increasingly more silly and unlikely
conspiracy theories that were running wild on the Internet.
_The Mossad was hiding in plain sight and the patriot researchers and conspiracy theorists never saw it at all.
_It
was clearly allies (or outright assets) of the Mossad—figures in Cass
Sunstein’s Crisis Management gang—who were conjuring up and distributing
the ridiculous stories that gained such currency. In effect, the
patriots were passing on Mossad-sponsored black propaganda and they
never understood that at all!
_And, naturally, this had the
desired effect of making any and all conspiracy theorists—especially
anyone who might date mention the dread word “Mossad”— look
crazy,marginal and generally to be disbelieved.
_So, in that
sense, the Mossad was behind Sandy Hook but not in the way that many
Sandy Hook true believers might like to think.At the very least, the
Mossad profited from Sandy Hook by being able to monitor (and
manipulate) the conspiracy theories that emerged. It was a classic
experiment in Crisis Management and Mind Control and the patriot
dissidents never understood that at all.
_And that’s precisely
why the bad folks at the Mossad and their allies among the Crisis
Management Conspirators had a good laugh at the antics of the “patriots”
who were hawking the latest disinformation inserted onto the Internet
designed to make those patriots look foolish.
_But despite the
contradictions in this realm (and in other aspects of the stories
circulating about Sandy Hook) that didn’t seem to phase many who helped
spread the stories saying,“I’m just passing on what I’ve heard.” These
people actually believed that as a member of “The Crowd” they were doing
their patriotic duty, having no idea they were being manipulated by the
very forces they were seeking to combat!
_The Crisis Management
Conspirators had once again put the theoretical precepts of their High
Priest—LeBon—into practice by conjuring up (and putting into
distribution via the Internet) the most audaciously ridiculous
narratives.They knew full well that “The Crowd” would buy into these
stories without question.As LeBon wrote:
_The
figurative imagination of crowds is very powerful, very active and very
susceptible of being keenly impressed. The images evoked in their mind
by a personage, an event, an accident, are almost as lifelike as the
reality.
_Crowds are to some extent in the position of the
sleeper whose reason, suspended for the time being, allows the arousing
in his mind of images of extreme intensity which would quickly be
dissipated could they be submitted to the action of reflection.
_Crowds,
being incapable both of reflection and of reasoning, are devoid of the
notion of improbability; and it is to be noted that in a general way it
is the most improbable things that are the most striking.
_This is why it happens that it is always the marvellous and legendary side of events that more specially strike crowds.
_Clearly,
this phenomenon explains why so many otherwise sensible people began to
believe some of the most extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook set
loose on the Internet by theretofore unknown“sources” with no record of
recognition or credibility in any way, shape or form.
_Because so
much of this material was being so quickly and so widely distributed
and then being re-distributed by others eager for new information about
Sandy Hook, these improbable and ridiculous notions effectively became a
matter of fact. And, as LeBon said, the “marvellous”—that is, the most
striking, even outrageous—aspects of the Sandy Hook theories were what
took hold.
_Before long, it was being said that accused Sandy
Hook shooter Adam Lanza hadn’t even fired a single shot that
day.According to the story, he had never even been in the school that
day—not alive, at least. The story was that Lanza had been formally
declared dead by the Social Security administration one day before the
shooting—and that he died in New Hampshire (a state away). The real
conspirators behind Sandy Hook had not only killed Lanza the day
before,but—evidently following the law (!)—they had made certain to
register his death with the Social Security administration, law-abiding
folks that these conspirators were.
_When some “theorists”were
pressed on this point, they could only respond,“Oh, well, they wanted us
to discover that.This was their way of confounding us and showing us
they could do anything they wanted. They wanted us to see that there
really was much more to the story but they also wanted to display their
power to cover up the truth.”
_Hardly a day had gone by before it
was alleged that the police and fire departments were involved in the
conspiracy, deliberately blocking the exits to the school during the
shooting for the purpose of ensuring that the killers could rack up as
high a body count as possible.
_The county coroner’s public
persona rubbed people the wrong way. Somebody pronounced the judgment
that he wasn’t “acting right” for someone who had just performed
autopsies on a bunch of purportedly dead children and therefore he
definitely had to be in on the act. He was just “too weird.”
_Soon enough, that was the final word on the matter among dissidents. Somebody had said it, so therefore it had to be true.
_But
the real question is this: WHO first said it and why did THEIR judgment
effectively become the last word on the subject—“proof”of a much-bigger
conspiracy? _Nobody seemed to know precisely where so much of
the “dissident” opinions were coming from—but whatever was said was
freely passed on as though it constituted solid proof of “something.”
_Because
the police initially prevented families from viewing the bullet- ripped
corpses of the children, word spread that the families never once saw
their dead children at all, despite the fact there were open casket
funerals for a number of the children the conspiracy theorists said had
never really died.
_Wax figures in the coffins,maybe? Designed to
fool the parents who believed that their children had been killed? (Or
were the parents, as some said, in on the conspiracy?)
_“If they
reported that the families couldn’t see the bodies,” demand ed those who
said they were “just asking questions,” then why, they asked,didn’t the
media then report that the families were finally allowed to see the
bodies?
_In fact, as anyone who has watched any of the standard
police procedural dramas that occupy much of television today knows full
well, it is not police procedure to allow the bodies of crime victims
to be immediately inspected by the families. And no, that’s not “just
Hollywood.” That’s how it really works.
_Ask your local policeman.
_In
fact, families were later allowed to view the remains of their dead
loved ones and in several instances (brought to my attention) there were
open caskets for children who had died.
_Here’s the story:
_In
a radio broadcast on Jan. 20, 2013 I had urgently warned truth seekers
not to be taken in by all of this emerging nonsense and came under a
great deal of criticism from many good folks who were fervent believers
in the theory that no children had died and that the stories told by
surviving Sandy Hook teachers (and children) were all lies.
_However,
I was heartened when—during an email exchange between myself and two
well-known and respected patriots, Carol Asher, the longtime assistant
to famed peace officer Jack McLamb, and Ron Neil of the Dollar DVD
Project Liberty (see the website at onedollardvdproject. com)—Ron sent
me this email saying: “You surprised me with your attitude about Sandy
Hook. I respect your opinion and will be more careful on this
subject.You reminded me that we must focus and not get sidetracked.”
_(My
whole point from the start! But most people who had joined the Sandy
Hook frenzy couldn’t quite see that, as Ron Neil clearly did.
_And—to
the heart of the matter—Ron also sent Carol and I a communication from
one of his correspondents who was commenting critically on allegations
that Sandy Hook teacher Kaitlin Roig was a fraud.
_While Roig was
being hailed as a heroine for having rescued her students, there were
truth seekers who had become convinced by the disinformation from the
Crisis Management Conspirators that Roig was an audacious liar.Neil’s
correspondent took issue with the claim—circulating on the Internet—that
Roig wasn’t even a teacher.
_In fact, she wrote: “She [Roig] is
my grandson’s teacher and I know that part is factual,” adding a very
real warning for truth seekers:
_I think
that a huge mistake has been made for the alternative media. We are
looking like "nuts" . . . especially the people that say that nobody
died. My daughter went to several wakes and funerals. And . . . she saw
open caskets. Some of her dear friends lost their children!
_In
the meantime, though, this teacher,Kaitlin Roig, was being called “a
possible Israeli Mossad terrorist” and a “false witness” and was
subjected to the claim that she was really actress Rebekah Fernandez who
was supposedly posing as a fake Sandy Hook teacher—namely Roig!
_So
although there was very real proof that Roig was a Sandy Hook teacher,
there were people who were saying that she was actually a “Crisis
Actor”—much more about the Crisis Actor theories later—who was playing a
part to help perpetrate a gigantic fraud.
_However, one truth
seeker—recognizing that there was something wrong with all of
this—commented in response to an Internet posting of a video of an
interview with Roig that critics “proved” she was a liar, an audacious
actress posing as a heroine:
_What
doesn't make sense to me, too, is that this Kaitlyn Roig is supposed to
be a paid actor, yet she is, or was, a teacher at the time of the
shooting?
_I mean, so let me get this straight: She taught at this school for, how long?
_But,
suddenly, now that this incident happened, and she's giving this report
about what went down in her own classroom, suddenly she's just labeled a
"paid actor," because people think she's lying?
_And—get
this—some of Roig’s critics even thought the fact that Roig was married
immediately after Sandy Hook was additional proof that she just
couldn’t be for real.“If she was so affected by the tragedy,” people
growled,“how could she dare get married?” This was the kind of genuinely
crazy theorizing (and thinking) that the Crisis Management Conspirators
had so effectively conjured up.
_(A personal note: My oldest
brother and his wife were married on the very day just hours her cousin
and two of their childhood friends— who were supposed to attend that
wedding—were killed in a tragic explosion. Nobody—absolutely
nobody—perceived their decision to proceed with the marriage as being
crass or as inappropriate.)
_But in the wake of Sandy Hook, it
became an article of faith that anyone who seemed to affirm
the“official” story in any way was lying. And it was such an attitude
that gripped the minds of truth seekers to the point, as Ron Neil’s
aforementioned correspondent said, that “We are looking like ‘nuts.’”
_But
truth seekers had become so much a part of “The Crowd” that they
couldn’t see what was happening and how they were effectively
discrediting themselves in the minds of the public.
_And then the
fact that the police would not release particular details of the
shooting was said to be “proof” that there was a cover-up. But, again,
the truth is that even a cursory reading of any daily newspaper
reporting on the most mundane of events involving a police investigation
will reveal—time and time again—that the police just simply do not go
about releasing a lot of data while any investigation is going on.
That’s a fact that can be confirmed by even the most casual reference to
any given newspaper in any town or city in the country.
_However,
under the clever contrivance of the Crisis Management
Conspirators,honest truth seekers had become totally distracted,caught
up in minutiae that was absolutely irrelevant but which, nonetheless,
seemed to possess the patriot movement, as if by magic.
_The
proverbial “Crowd” had been caught up in a whirlwind of deliberate
disinformation. It was as though some people genuinely wanted to believe
that nothing—absolutely nothing—was true.That all was a lie. And a lot
of cheap hucksters—along with the Crisis Management Conspirators—played
on this.
_It was even said that the governor of Connecticut had
advance knowledge of the impending “event”—we’ll call it an event,
rather than a shooting, since a lot of people don’t think anybody was
really shot at Sandy Hook in the first place!
_The basis of this rumor was the fact the governor had said publicly that he had been told that such an event could happen.
_What
the governor was saying—and this was no secret—was that public schools
and other venues—public and private, including shopping malls, bus
stations, etc—had been training their own personnel in the matter of
dealing with such an emergency.
_However, the governor’s
comment—based on something that had been widely reported for months,
even years, on end in the mass media (that is, how communities were
preparing to deal with such events)— was twisted and presented as a
Freudian slip that revealed the governor’s foreknowledge of the
impending crisis at Sandy Hook.
_According to one claim, it was
Attorney General Eric Holder (evidently another of the many
conspirators) who briefed the governor a full month in advance that
there was going to be a phony happening at Sandy Hook to be presented to
the public as a “school shooting.”
_How many other public
officials and law enforcement were brought into the loop no one could
really say for sure, but then, again, it had already been suggested (as
noted earlier) that the local police and fire departments were part of
the massacre (or, at least, the cover-up). It seemed like the entire
town was involved. But, then again, there were those who were saying
that no massacre had even really happened!
_It came down to this:
There were some 500 students at Sandy Hook. However, as we’ve said,
some people don’t believe there really was a functioning school there at
all. And it is said that—of those 500 students—20 of them (along with
their families and others) faked their deaths.But some truth
seekers—influenced by the disinformation of the Crisis Management
Conspirators—now question whether at least some—if not all—of these
students ever even existed!
_But accepting the idea that 20
students are no longer officially alive (and thus presumably in hiding)
that means there are some 480 other students (and roughly 960 parents)
and lord knows how many thousands upon thousands of siblings,
grandparents, aunts and uncles related to the “surviving” 480 kids who
are participating in one of the most extraordinary hoaxes of modern
history.
_Meanwhile, others said, Newtown, Connecticut and its
environs was an outpost of Satanism and that most of the people in town
were Satanists.
_That explained why virtually everyone was involved in the conspiracy designed to portray a non-event as a bloody massacre.
_When
sober patriot critics pointed out that Satanists are known to engage in
real blood-letting and don’t generally “fake” such events, preferring
the very real slaughter of little children, those who were advocates of
the theory that “the Satanists” had helped conjure the Sandy Hook hoax
were hard-pressed to respond.
_Others claimed there were people in
Newtown who knew the whole affair was a “hoax” and wanted to speak out
(or who were speaking out privately) but they didn’t want their names
revealed.Those people were either being blackmailed or coerced in some
fashion.
_In other words, an entire community—a town of nearly
30,000 people— was held under such control that not a single person
would (or could) go public and blow the whistle and expose the hoax!
_The
theory is yours to choose: Either most of the people in the town were
Satanists or otherwise somehow in on the plot or most of the people were
somehow being prevented from daring to speak out.
_And part of
the whole big plot—so some say—is that (as we keep reminding you) there
wasn’t even really a functioning school at the structure in Sandy Hook
where the “phony” shooting took place.
_I kid you not.
_Those
unfamiliar with all of the give-and-take that erupted on the Internet
simply have no idea how truly outlandish it all became. It does get a
little confusing, to be sure, but that didn’t stop people from spreading
the stories.
_For God’s sake,don’t let anything stand in the way
of a good story— especially if attracts traffic to your Internet
website (and brings you a bundle full of cash contributions).
_On
one occasion a very prominent “patriot” radio broadcaster extended his
sympathies to the people of Newtown for the lives lost at Sandy Hook and
then,minutes later, on the same broadcast, referred to the matter as a
gigantic hoax that never happened.
_Why the broadcaster felt the
need to extend his sympathy to Newtown for a tragedy that hadn’t really
taken place remains a mystery (to me). But he had a lot of followers who
hung on his every word.
_All of that having been said, it’s no
surprise, when we continue to review the work of Gustave Le Bon—who
provided the playbook for the Crisis Management Conspirators—to see that
Le Bon had been able to project with absolute certainly that the
insertion of wild claims into “The Crowd” would prove a perfect means of
splitting the dissident movement from within.
_Le Bon described
what he called“the intolerance,dictatorialness and conservatism of
crowds,” and recognizing this factor, the Crisis Management Conspirators
played this phenomenon to the hilt.
_These malicious
manipulators knew full well that the moment cautious, detail-oriented,
fact-focused researchers questioned the disinformation and nonsense that
this would enrage those in“The Crowd” who had been coopted into what
had essentially become a Sandy Hook Cult. Here’s how Le Bon put it:
_Crowds
are only cognisant of simple and extreme sentiments; the opinions,
ideas, and beliefs suggested to them are accepted or rejected as a
whole, and considered as absolute truths or as not less absolute
errors.
_This is always the case with beliefs induced by a process of suggestion instead of engendered by reasoning.
_Every
one is aware of the intolerance that accompanies religious beliefs, and
of the despotic empire they exercise on men's minds.
_Being in
doubt as to what constitutes truth or error, and having,on the other
hand, a clear notion of its strength, a crowd is as disposed to give
authoritative effect to its inspirations as it is intolerant.
_An
individual may accept contradiction and discussion; a crowd will never
do so. At public meetings the slightest contradiction on the part of an
orator is immediately received with howls of fury and violent invective,
soon followed by blows, and expulsion should the orator stick to his
point.
_And just as LeBon had suggested, those
honest truth seekers who dared to question the fallacious (and patently
ridiculous) stories that had been injected into discussion of Sandy Hook
came under the most intense fire from otherwise good people—and the
Crisis Management Conspirators absolutely loved it.
_As
incredible as it may seem to readers who will learn of this for the
first time, even those who dared to suggest that perhaps children did
actually die at Sandy Hook were called “traitors” by other patriots who
had bought into the disinformation being inserted into the minds of
patriots via the Crisis Management Conspirators working to discredit
“conspiracy theories” in any form.
_Thanks to the Orwellian
manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief in
Sandy Hook as having been a massive hoax was essentially being
instituted as a virtual litmus test as to“who’s a real patriot and who
isn’t.” Those who didn’t believe Sandy Hook was a massive hoax are
denounced as having been “bribed, blackmailed, or coerced” or just
having simply “changed sides.”
_Veteran patriots said they had
never seen anything like it—and they recognized it was because of the
influence of the Internet (or rather, the influence of those Crisis
Management Conspirators who were abusing the Internet for their own
insidious purposes).
_In short, Sandy Hook effectively emerged as
a cult, with its own unique built-in theology that cannot be
questioned. To raise any doubts about the foundation of the cult was—and
still is—considered heresy. Anyone who doubted even the most unlikely
portion of the Sandy Hook theories was portrayed as a “traitor to the
patriot movement”—or that’s what the Crisis Management Conspirators
wanted patriots to think!
_The successful introduction by the
Crisis Management Conspirators of their own disinformation into the
patriot movement had set in motion a very real crisis—in and of
itself—in which real patriots were being crucified for standing up and
calling out the real conspirators for trying to mislead patriots.
_One
longtime critic of gun control was accused of lending support to
pro-gun control forces because he believed children died at Sandy Hook—a
total disconnect, of course, but illustrative of the kind of mindset
that was taking hold.
_Another person was accused of being
“pro-Obama” because he doubted some Sandy Hook theories, the apparent
presumption being that since Sandy Hook took place under the hated
Obama’s watch that anyone who believed the official story therefore had
to be pro-Obama for believing the basic claim that a crazed lone gunman
was responsible.
_(On the other hand, though,as we’ve noted, some
of the others who believed that there was a bigger story to Sandy Hook
believed Israel’s Mossad had carried out the crime in order to hurt
President Obama whereas others believed the Mossad did so in order to
help him.)
_So, as we said, choose your favorite theory—courtesy of Cass Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_It
was almost like Alice in Wonderland—definitely beyond belief. If
there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’s this: There’s more to
the Sandy Hook story than even the most dedicated conspiracy theorists
understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.”
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators (via Internet monitoring) were able to see
preciselyWHO spread the rumors via email and fromWHAT websites and
sources they got their information in the first place.
_As a
direct consequence of this one event and the frenzy surrounding it, the
powers-that-be had an absolute first-ever 24/7 fool-proof method of
monitoring communications and resources within the circles of the
dissident movement.
_The Sandy Hook venture itself was just stage
one in the scheme, giving them the opportunity to observe and weigh the
responses of the conspiracy theorists to the actual events that had
occurred and to monitor their responses to the often-illogical and
contradictory tales being bandied about by the Crisis Management
Conspirators.
_On the broader scale, in the bigger picture, the
Crisis crowd was laying the groundwork to have—in the future—a more
precise, more calibrated focus on the exchange of information by the
conspiracy theorists and to be able to actually dominate and direct the
course of their thinking altogether. And, naturally—if necessary—to
discredit them in no uncertain terms in the minds of the general
population.
_Perhaps even more importantly, the Sunstein-inspired
program of monitoring and manipulation now made it possible to lay the
groundwork—as appropriate—in manipulating opinion during some future
major event, perhaps one already well-planned in advance— another 9-11,
if you will—or some scheme still in the works.
_Sandy Hook was
indeed a “false flag” of the first order—and it had the ultimate impact
of totally misdirecting the attention of patriots from the real forces
that were laying out the misinformation that was so thoroughly
misdirecting them.
_In the end, one of the most respected longtime
patriot voices, Devvy Kidd, dared to put it all in perspective.On April
28, 2013, on her website at newswithviews.com,Kidd laid it on the
line:
_Over the past nearly two
decades,every time some horrific “event” happens,wanna be "journalists"
come out of the wood work with their conspiracy theories based on
absolutely nothing. Bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank
speculation. Irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or
to get people to their web sites.
_They have zero credibility and
hurt the rest of us by being lumped together. I have debunked
conspiracy theories in the past based on documentation. I get attacked
as if I'm the bad guy for pursuing the truth! There are conspiracies and
coverups, but we want the truth, not speculation.
_What
a damned shame there were not more voices of caution raised while the
Sandy Hook affair was in its frenzy. But there were too many people in
“The Crowd” who had been captivated by the virus of manufactured
conspiracy fever that had been spawned in the Mind Control laboratories
of the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_And, if truth be told,
there were many so-called “leaders” of the would-be “truth movement” who
were afraid to dissent, fearful of being called “traitors” and accused
of being “agents of Barack Obama and the NewWorld Order” if they dared
to say that the foolish madness inserted into the minds of truth seekers
(via the machinations of the Conspiracy Management gang) was just that:
a bunch of foolishness.
_The whole Sandy Hook venture was
largely a “private” affair, in that the circumstances surrounding the
event were essentially limited to what did—or did not—take place within
the confines of that elementary school in Newtown.
_However, not
long afterward—on April 15, 2013—with the very “public” event involving
the Boston Marathon (on the very open and public streets of Boston) the
Crisis Management Conspirators were able to fine tune what they had
already honed into a specialized “science”: a tool of Orwellian
manipulation of the first—and worst—order.
_With Boston, the
Sunstein thesis—now a live-action, real-time project in motion, having
been successfully tested with Sandy Hook—was adapted to a much
bigger,more broad-ranging event that (all of the nonsensical theories
accompanying it notwithstanding) had all the earmarks of having been a
very real “false flag”operation of Israel’s Mossad. But, once again, the
truth seekers were misdirected . . .
CHAPTER THIRTY . . .
Who “The Crisis Actors” REALLY Are:
How Truth Seekers Were Manipulated
into Ignoring Genuine “False Flag” Terrorism
and Focusing Instead on Irrelevant Lunacy
_The
manipulation by the Crisis Management Conspirators of the events at
Sandy Hook was, in retrospect, a quite logical response to the
phenomenon of 9-11 truthseeking (much of it Internet-based) which, in
turn, had its own antecedents in the search for the truth surrounding
the Oklahoma City bombing and the JFK assassination so many years
before.
_In that sense,we might suggest, there was indeed a
secret connection, so to speak, between 9-11 and Sandy Hook—but it’s one
that even the most fervent believers in the “big” story of Sandy Hook
never realized, precisely because of the fact they had found themselves
(most of them, to this day, unknowingly) caught in the web of
disinformation being spun by the high-level Crisis Management
Conspirators.
_And one of the biggest cons of all perpetrated
upon the legitimate truth seekers was the legend of “The Crisis
Actors”—mentioned earlier— that came to be an article of faith
surrounding Sandy Hook and later again, even more so, following the
events at the Boston Marathon.
_And as we’ve already noted
(perhaps all too often) in the wake of Sandy Hook many people actually
believed that there hadn’t even been any gunplay at all—that no children
and no adults were shot that day, that it was all a big staged event,
with the purported victims and their families (along with law
enforcement) in on the deal.
_This is where the now
much-discussed topic of “The Crisis Actors” was brought into play.And,
in many respects, it may have been one of the most ingenious scams ever
pawned off on American patriots designed to misdirect their attention.
_It was right out of Cass Sunstein’s playbook.
_During
the wake of Sandy Hook, people got so distracted talking about the
Crisis Actors and the claim that "Lanza was dead the day before the
shooting which really didn't happen and in which no kids were really
killed," that, in many cases, they didn't do what they should have done:
Lobby forcefully against the gun control measures that were being
crafted as a consequence of the tragedy at Sandy Hook.
_Many
patriots became genuinely convinced that by talking about “The Crisis
Actors” that they were winning the day and convincing people of the
dangers of gun control when, in fact, they were actually misdirecting
good people and, for all intents and purposes,discrediting honest
Americans who were opposed to gun control.
_As a result of the
widespread distribution of claims that Sandy Hook was a big fraud being
perpetrated by “Crisis Actors” many Americans concluded that the
opponents of gun control were trouble-makers, wildeyed conspiracy
theorists and just generally to be dismissed.
_That, ultimately,was
the aim of the Crisis Management Conspirators. Their introduction of the
concept of“CrisisActors” into the debate was part and parcel of the
very real conspiracy—first outlined by Cass Sunstein—to discredit
conspiracy theories in general.
_And all of this undoubtedly did
immense damage to the reputation of many good patriots who opposed gun
control and who were led into the trap of focusing on the Crisis Actor
legend rather than on the very real and important issue at hand.
_And
what is so remarkable is that, to this day, although patriotic folks
who regularly discuss Sandy Hook and Boston speak in hushed (and
not-so-hushed) tones about “The Crisis Actors” and the role that they
supposedly played in those events, there is not one single individual
who is able to say precisely “who” it was who first introduced the
concept of the CrisisActors into the vernacular of the Sandy Hook truth
seekers.And that is telling, in and of itself.
_We know, for example,
following the JFK assassination, that it was Mark Lane who largely
popularized the term“grassy knoll”—relating to the likely positioning in
Dealey Plaza of one of the gunmen who fired on President Kennedy.
_But
Lane himself is the first to admit that he first heard the term “grassy
knoll” used by one of the assassination witnesses, Jean Hill,who used
that term in an interview.And Hill herself has said that this just
happened to be the particular phraseology that popped into her head in
seeking a way to describe that geographic location in Dealey Plaza.
_And
that’s how the term “grassy knoll” ultimately came into widespread
parlance, not only in reference to the JFK assassination but also in
reference to “conspiracy theories” in general.
_But there is
absolutely nobody who can explain just who it was who “figured out” that
Crisis Actors had been utilized as part of the Sandy Hook (and later
the Boston Marathon) conspiracy.
_And the reason for that is that
this whole concept of Crisis Actors having been dispatched as part of
the conspiracy was a creation of the Crisis Management Conspirators
themselves.
_Now let it be said that there really are people known as Crisis Actors.They do exist.They’ve been around for a while.
_However,
the proponents of the Crisis Actors theory relating to Sandy Hook (and
later the Boston Marathon) would have people believe that the existence
of CrisisActors is some deep dark secret, that they are part of a
long-standing high-level covert operation kept from the public, perhaps a
creation of Homeland Security or the CIA or some combination of
elements of the emerging American Police State, paid agents of the
vaunted military-industrial-complex.
_It’s an exciting theory, to be
sure, but the truth is that—for years—you have been able go to the
Internet and find a number of Internet websites of real-life
profit-making businesses that train and provide Crisis Actors who
interact with government (local, state and federal) as well as private
industries and enterprises in preparing to deal with crisis events of
various kinds, including mass shootings, hostage situations,
earthquakes, fires, riots—all manner of chaos.
_One such business engaging in the Crisis Actor industry (which is what it amounts to) is crisisactors.org.
_On the website of that company, their promotional material reads:
“Crisis
Actors: Trained Players and Actors Making it Real,” stating that their
mission is: “Helping schools and first responders create realistic
drills, full-scale exercises, high-fidelity simulations, and interactive
3D films.” The website even includes a section called “Crisis Acting
News” highlighting a variety of events in which their skills and
services have been utilized (and openly publicized in newspapers and
televised by broadcast outlets in local communities across the country).
_Here
are just a few examples from crisisactors.org, citing Internet links to
some of the newspapers and broadcast outlets that have cited the work
of Crisis Actors in their particular communities.
_• Active Shooter Training At Closed Elementary School in Plymouth - Patch.com
_• Local law enforcement agencies take active shooter training - KOB.com
_• Lower Burrell police conduct 'active shooter' training at Burrell High School - Tribune-Review
_• HSI holding 'active shooter' training in NM - Alamogordo Daily News
_• Active-shooter drill to be conducted at Fulton-Montgomery Community College -WRGB
_• New Canaan To Conduct Active Shooter Drill On Thursday - The Daily Voice
_•Waterloo Schools Active Shooter Training - KGANTV
_All
across the United States today there are members of local police and
fire departments, emergency response units—even members of the National
Guard—who have worked with CrisisActors on a regular basis.
_The
existence, then, of Crisis Actors is no big secret. But it wasn’t until
the Crisis Management Conspirators deliberately hyped the legend (via
the Internet) that Crisis Actors were part of the conspiracy at Sandy
Hook that many people became aware of their existence.
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators inserted the legend of the Crisis Actors onto
the Internet with the expectation that it would become a part of the
lore of Sandy Hook and help add confusion and—more importantly—play a
significant part in discrediting conspiracy theories and conspiracy
theorists in the minds of the broad general public.
_Essentially, in
relation to Sandy Hook, in particular, the Crisis Actors Theory held
that, for example, Robbie Parker, the father of one of the children
killed at Sandy Hook,was actually a Crisis Actor.
_The claim
was based on the fact that—just prior to giving a public statement
expressing his horror at the loss of his child—Parker smiled and laughed
and then asked if the cameras were on yet and then,while speaking,
referred to written notes. Nobody who had actually lost a child under
such tragic circumstances, it was proclaimed,would actually smile or
laugh.Nor would they need to refer to written notes.
_Such
allegations are patently ridiculous. People react differently to
tragedy. Some people put on a brave face when confronted with
tragedy.And most people have never been confronted with a horde of
reporters and television cameras converging on their home in the wake of
such an internationally-publicized tragedy in which they (and their
dead child) have unwittingly become a part.
_The idea someone would
need to rely on notes to speak publicly is not so outrageous.Very few
people are trained in public speaking and often need notes, just as even
professional speakers rely on written texts when giving their own
presentations. But the fact that Robbie Parker was using notes was
suddenly “proof” that he was a Crisis Actor!
_So when the Crisis
Management Conspirators put out the idea that Robbie Parker was a Crisis
Actor whose child hadn’t been killed, Parker began receiving threats
for “play acting” and the controlled media (allied with the Crisis
Management Conspirators) immediately brought this to the attention of
the general public who were quite correctly horrified that “those
conspiracy theorists”would actually question the grief of a mourning
parent and suggest that he was “faking” his child’s death.
_What most
of those who bought into the idea Parker was a Crisis Actor never
seemed to consider was the point that if he was a Crisis Actor, he
probably wouldn’t have needed written notes when he “performed” for the
cameras. Actors—you see—rely upon their skills to remember their
lines.Actors generally don’t use cue cards or at least not ones that
they hold right there in front of them while speaking!
_Later, it
was even alleged that Parker’s dead child was actually photographed in
the presence of Barack Obama when he visited Newtown to meet with the
families. In other words, that the “phony” Parker and his family (all
part of the conspiracy) had brazenly dared to allow the supposedly dead
child to be shown to be alive after it was said that she had been killed
at Sandy Hook.
_The claim was based on the fact that the surviving
sisters of the dead child bore a striking resemblance to the victim—that
happens in families, you know—and that one of the children in the
picture with Obama seemed to be wearing the same dress that the dead
child had previously been photographed wearing.That was “proof” that it
was the dead child who was, it was said, still alive.
_But any family
with multiple sons or daughters knows that the clothing of older
children is passed on to younger children. But then, again,when it came
time to promote the idea of Crisis Actors—and the theme that “no
children died at Sandy Hook”—simple points such as that seemed to get
lost in the Crisis Management Conspiracy Barndance.
_In another
instance, a parent of one of the dead children was accused of being a
Crisis Actor because the parent said in an interview that one of his
surviving children said that she wanted to urge President Obama to
support gun control. No child in grade school, it was said, would be
thinking about a political issue such as gun control. Especially, it was
added, after one of her siblings had been killed.
_The idiocy of
such a claim should be obvious. School children do have political
opinions and even “vote” in mock presidential elections every four
years—from first grade through graduation—even if they don’t necessarily
understand the political issues.
_Young children do know who the
president is and in this “Information Age” they do hear about issues
such as gun control, in particular, on a 24/7 basis, whether or
television or radio or even on the Internet, and especially after such a
crisis as Sandy Hook.
_And it’s entirely possible that a child who
had lost a sibling at a school shooting would want to express her
concerns about gun control to “the president” who is perceived as the
man who rules America and who makes important decisions about big issues
such as gun control.
_In fact, they said, a lot of the well-known
Sandy Hook personalities featured in the media were actors—why, they
never even lived in Sandy Hook at all! (Just as they had said that the
school was not even a functioning school at the time of the purported
shooting!)
_Various cuts of what is called“raw”media footage of one
Sandy Hook celebrity—a notably obnoxious character named Gene Rosen (a
veritable stereotype for a particular type of Jewish caricature often
seen in Hollywood comedy)—telling bits and pieces of what he claimed to
have seen, was cited as proof Rosen had “practiced” his lines (like an
actor) and that the story he was telling was just not true.
_Rosen—who
was clearly a publicity hound who reveled in his brief brush with the
proverbial “15 minutes of fame”—was over-the-top to the point of being
annoying and—in fact—the media people who had interviewed Rosen had
taped him at various moments and Rosen was clearly fine-tuning, even
rehearsing what he was about to say in the various “cuts” of the raw
footage that later popped up on the Internet.
_As such it was
immediately insinuated that Rosen was a Crisis Actor dispatched by the
powers-that-be to craft a bit of film propaganda for the benefit of the
American public to help perpetrate the“lie” that there had been a
shooting at the school.
_But here is what is important to remember . . .
_What
all of the patriot conspiracy theorists seemed to miss was this big
question: How was it that this raw footage—taped by a cameramen from the
Controlled Media—just happened to be leaked to the conspiracy theorists
as “proof” that Rosen was a Crisis Actor? _Clearly, there were
people in the Controlled Media—in league with the Crisis Management
Conspirators—who were deliberately helping propagate the legend of the
Crisis Actors by leaking raw footage such as this.
_They knew
with absolute certainty that the people in “The Crowd” who had bought
into the CrisisActors theory would jump on the Rosen story in a
heartbeat.And that is precisely what they did.
In the end, you see, the real CrisisActors were not the parents of the murdered children (or even the ridiculous Gene Rosen).
_Instead
the Crisis Actors were actually those “cyber shills” (posing as “truth
seekers”) who were acting out a very specific role—acting on behalf of
the Crisis Management Conspirators—in bombarding the Internet with all
of the outlandish stories that distracted patriots and truth seekers
from the big picture and thereby helping discredit all forms of
conspiracy theories (and conspiracy theorists) in general.
_It’s just so damned obvious.
_In fact, it’s typical Zionist Israeli trickery:
_(1) Operating in plain sight;
_(2)
Standing there in vampire’s garb,pointing at someone dressed as an
angel, and shouting,“There’s the vampire over there!” and
_(3) Thoroughly distracting everyone from the big picture.
This
frequent Zionist tactic of accusing others of what they are in fact
guilty of has been aptly described as “accusatory projection” or
“accusatory inversion.”
_The Crisis Actors theme got ever more
ridiculous as the story was repeated again and again.At one point it
was even claimed a catering truck—said to be on the scene at Sandy
Hook—had been dispatched to cater food and beverages for the Crisis
Actors at work perpetuating the conspiracy, just as—it was pointed
out—catering trucks will be found on the scene when Hollywood films are
being made “on location.”
_I’ve personally seen one of these catering
trucks parked just a few blocks from my own home on Capitol Hill in
Washington, D.C. when actor Clint Eastwood was filming a rooftop chase
scene for his action film In the Line of Fire.Despite this, however, I
sincerely doubt that the Sandy Hook “conspiracy” was so fine-tuned that
the conspirators sent a catering truck to keep the Crisis Actors at
Sandy Hook well nourished.
_Yet, I am here to tell you that the
Crisis Management Conspirators managed to convince a lot of well meaning
people that this is actually what really happened. (Oh, those nasty
caterers—conspirators all!)
_And here’s something about the Crisis
Actors disinformation that needs to be mentioned—and this will astound
many readers who will learn about this for the first time . . .
_In
fact, one of the most vociferous proponents of the Crisis Actors
theory—a character who uses the name “DallasGoldbug”—also put forth the
following assertions regarding other “actors” he claims to have
discovered posturing in the public arena:
_• John F. Kennedy did not die in Dallas but reinvented himself as future president Jimmy Carter;
_• A single woman posed as not only actress Marilyn Monroe but also former First Ladies Jacqueline Kennedy and Rosalyn Carter;
_• Former Vice President Nelson Rockefeller was really country and western singer Tex Ritter;
_• Billionaire David Rockefeller is actually popular conspiracy theorist Jordan Maxwell;
_• David Rockefeller, Jr. is another popular conspiracy theorist William Cooper (who was killed by police in 2001);
_• Famed country singer Patsy Cline posed as Marina Oswald, the wife of JFK’s accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald;
_• Comic actor Chevy Chase poses as Sen. Jay Rockefeller;
_• Former Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo is now posing as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” Joe Arpaio of Arizona;
_• Infamous Nazi figure Adolf Eichmann was really the popular singer and motion picture star Bing Crosby; and
_• No less than Adolf Hitler was actually Walt Disney.
_And here are three of my personal favorites from“Dallas Goldbug” involving three individuals whom I have known quite well:
_•Nelson Rockefeller’s son, Rodman, poses as veteran JFK assassination researcher Mark Lane;
_•
Famed former State Rep. David Duke, is actually a Hollywood actor named
Thomas Haden Church; and _•Actor JonathanWinters posed as longtime
American Free Press “Bilderberg Hound” James P. Tucker, Jr.;
_DallasGoldbug
posted “convincing” video and photographic evidence that“proved”these
contentions,yet many who were caught up in the claims about Crisis
Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston had no idea that the Crisis Actors story
was also inextricably linked to this lunacy.
_In fact, Gustave
LeBon—the grand guru of the the Crisis Management Conspirators—had
described how the “crowd” could be dazzled by all sorts of images and in
the aftermath of the Boston Maraton bombing, “The Crowd” of our modern
day was indeed captivated by dazzling images which they believed
“proved” that there had been hanky panky on the streets of Boston.
_In
fact, many "truth seekers" picked up the stories being put out by the
phony patriots—the Crisis Actors working for the Sunstein gang—that
there wasn't even really any bombing at all! It was akin to the
claim—which had already proven successful in winning credence with the
real patriots—that there hadn’t even been a shooting at Sandy Hook.
_And
while the whole story of what really happened at Boston has yet to be
unraveled,what we do know is that two young Muslims (the Tsarnaev
brothers) were accused of the crime—yet another Muslim “false flag” akin
to the 9-11 tragedy.
_And we also know that evidence indicates that
the intelligence services of the United States,Russia—and certainly
Israel—had their eyes on the Tsarnaevs for a long time prior to the
bombing, just as the ADL and other Israeli-connected elements were
“monitoring” Timothy McVeigh prior to the Oklahoma City bombing.
_However—at
this juncture—we don’t know the entire scenario, but we do know there
has been a lot of disinformation put into circulation designed to
deflect attention away from Israel which is certainly (beyond question)
the prime beneficiary of the crime as a consequence of the purported
danger from the Muslim world continuing to be in the forefront of the
mind (and concerns) of the American people.
_In short, Boston was simply a replay of the 9-11 false flag that redirected American thinking in the wake of that tragedy.
_It
was a reinvigoration of the template for terror utilized in 9-11 and in
the Oklahoma bombing and in the JFK assassination involving, yet again,
the widespread dissemination of carefully-crafted disinformation
designed to cover Israeli involvement in those acts of terror.
_(For
my own part, from the beginning, it has been my opinion that Israel was
behind the Boston bombing for the precise purpose of conjuring up
another Muslim“false flag.” I expressed this view in a broadcast
interview at theuglytruth.wordpress.com with Mark Glenn who shares my
view on this matter.)
_Yet, the Crisis Management Conspirators
successfully distracted truth seekers—who were convinced that, once
again, the authorities were covering up the truth about the Boston
bombing—by cranking up the Crisis _Actors legend (first spawned in the
wake of Sandy Hook).
_Rather than focusing on who was behind the
bombing, truth seekers focused instead on stories—with accompanying
videos and photographic images of the chaos following the
bombing—planted on the Internet in conjunction with the insistent claim
that Crisis Actors were busy on the streets of Boston detaching false
arms and legs and faking injuries and throwing around buckets of stage
blood for the benefit of video cameras.
_All of the imagery captured
the attention of the patriots who suddenly showed little—if any—interest
in trying to determine who was responsible for the Muslim “false flag”
that the Controlled Media was waving in the face of a horrified American
public.
_Here is how Le Bon described precisely this kind of manipulation.
_Crowds
being only capable of thinking in images are only to be impressed by
images. It is only images that terrify or attract them and become
motives of action.
_For this reason theatrical representations, in
which the image is shown in its most clearly visible shape, always have
an enormous influence on crowds. Bread and spectacular shows constituted
for the plebeians of ancient Rome the ideal of happiness, and they
asked for nothing more.
_Throughout the successive ages this ideal
has scarcely varied. Nothing has a greater effect on the imagination of
crowds of every category than theatrical representations.
_The entire
audience experiences at the same time the same emotions, and if these
emotions are not at once transformed into acts, it is because the most
unconscious spectator cannot ignore that he is the victim of illusions,
and that he has laughed or wept over imaginary adventures.
_Le
Bon realized—and the Crisis Management Conspirators recognized that he
was absolutely correct—that these kind of images were ideal for the
purpose of Crowd Control and mass manipulation:
_Whatever
strikes the imagination of crowds presents itself under the shape of a
startling and very clear image, freed from all accessory explanation, or
merely having as accompaniment a few marvellous or mysterious facts:
examples in point are a great victory, a great miracle, a great crime,
or a great hope. Things must be laid before the crowd as a whole, and
their genesis must never be indicated.
_A hundred petty crimes or
petty accidents will not strike the imagination of crowds in the least,
whereas a single great crime or a single great accident will profoundly
impress them, even though the results be infinitely less disastrous than
those of the hundred small accidents put together.
_In
the wake of Boston, the theme of “Crisis Actors” got further (and quite
considerable) mileage with the use of such imagery.With Le Bon’s
assertions about “The Crowd”—and its susceptibility to incorporating
such images into its thinking—the Crisis Management gang kept conspiracy
theorists busy.
_One widely circulated proof of the “conspiracy” was
a selection of several frames from a video of the bombing. A few frames
were “analyzed”—a few frames that represented just a few seconds of
time—and were “found” to show a woman (said to be a Crisis Actor)
“giving hand signs” and helping other Crisis Actors fake blood and
injuries.
_To do all of this—live—before very REAL people who were
not Crisis Actors but who WERE on the scene, would take more than
seconds to accomplish successfully.
_Anyone who has ever participated
in the taping of a television show or even an amateur home movie—let
alone a serious film production—knows how much time and work is involved
making just one “incident” look real, -and that it can’t be
accomplished in just seconds!
_But most people—including a lot of
good patriots—have never been involved in any such production and don’t
have any idea that even one second in, for example, an old-style 8mm
movie, can amount to as many as 18 different frames. Meaning, of course,
that those who were microanalyzing the films that they said “proved”
there had been fakery were actually analyzing milli-seconds, for God’s
sake!
_Such simple facts were lost in the “Crisis Actors Shuffle” that accompanied the frenzy over the Boston bombing.
_A
lot of good patriots fell into what we might call, for want of a better
way of describing it,“the Trap of Belief,” because they had become
familiar, in years past, with people who were quite accurately and
correcting analyzing the famous (although remarkably brief) bit of film
known as the Zapruder Film of the JFK assassinaton.
_Again and again
over the years a variety of analysts had de-constructed the film, frame
by frame, to demonstrate the point that it was clear, on film, that the
official Warren Commission version of the JFK assassination was
repudiated by what purported to be an actual amateur 8mm film taken at
the time of the JFK assassination.
_(Now, ironically, there are those
who say that Zapruder film itself is some sort of forgery or an altered
version of the original film or even a combination of several films
made to appear to be one.And the truth is that past and present
technology does make such things possible.)
_As such, having seen
(over some 50 years) such analysis of the Zapruder film (and other
images of the JFK assassination) again and again, on video, on the
Internet, in books and magazines, patriots and truth seekers became
accustomed to this technique of conspiracy inquiry.And knowing that this
was the case, following Sandy Hook and Boston, the Crisis Management
Conspirators went assiduously to work and deliberately played on this
when they began hyping the claims that Crisis Actors had staged false
injuries (in a fake bombing) for the benefit of the American population
at large.
_The consequence of this was that when honest truth-seekers
began circulating the stories that videos of the bombing were “fakes,”
many serious-minded folks in the general public began to think, quite
frankly, that these truth seekers were just plain crazy.
_There were
people from all over the United States who had come to the Boston
Marathon and they went home to tell friends and family about their
narrow brush with disaster,only to hear that there were conspiracy
theorists on the Internet who were saying that the bombing didn’t happen
and that nobody really lost an arm or a leg.
_And the“proof”was a
few seconds of one film that went viral on the Internet which convinced
the truth seekers that it was all a big lie!
_If you have any doubts
about this, go out and purchase a DVD of some current“action”film and
listen to the director’s commentary.You’ll learn how, for example, one
scene in a Hollywood film which occupies just a second or two (on film)
can actually take up to as much as two or three days to film (sometimes
on multiple locations,no less) not to mention the introduction of a wide
array of computer-generated imagery and other technological
advances,many of which didn’t even exist as little as ten or fifteen
years ago.
_Did you really think that was a big ship sinking in the middle of the North Atlantic in James Cameron’s classic film Titanic?
_Did you really think that real people were falling down and hurting themselves as the ship sank?
_Of course you didn’t!
_In
fact, some of the most mundane moments in that wide-ranging disaster
film were actually the work of clever Hollywood legerdemain.
_Even
the relatively brief and simple scene of the film’s romantic duo—Kate
Winslett and Leonardo DiCaprio—at the stern of the ship whenWinslett’s
character is threatening to jump overboard and commit suicide involved
endless hours of filming using several different stages and multiple
means of technological wizardry.
_If you were among those who were
caught up in the legends surrounding Crisis Actors at the Boston
Marathon and the stories on the Internet purporting to analyze just a
moment or two of the events that took place there, then read that
preceding paragraph again—no, in fact, read it twice—and consider the
ramifications . . .
_As we said—and this is critical to
understand—the point is that even a moment of drama on film can take
literally days to produce and simply can not be carried out in just a
few split seconds.
But those Crisis Management Conspirators who
have been purveying the Crisis Actors false flag to mislead truth
seekers know that most people have no idea how technologically advanced
film-making has become, even at the same time it remains time-consuming
and requires vast participation by multiple people at various levels So,
then, in the context of the events at the Boston Marathon,what does all
of this mean?
_It’s very simple . . .
_If the conspirators
behind the events in Boston wanted to produce a piece of film to
convince unwittingAmericans that a bombing did take place which injured
many people—including those who lost arms and legs—they did not have to
dispatch hordes of “Crisis Actors” onto the scene to engage in
complicated motions of “reacting” to a bomb and then rolling about on
the crowd pretending to be injured, hysterically clinging to severed
arms and legs, throwing about fake blood, etc.
_That just isn’t how it works.
_IF
there HAD been a major conspiracy to "fake" all of these things, the
whole process COULD (and WOULD) have been done beforehand using
high-tech computer generated images produced in a laboratory.
_The
so-called Crisis Actors didn't even have to be ANYWHERE NEAR the bomb
site and positioned where "honest witnesses" could have seen anything
suspicious such as what has been claimed to have happened.
_For
serious truth seekers—particularly those who were caught up in the
legend of Crisis Actors at Boston who were purportedly busy faking
injuries, throwing around fake blood, detaching prosthetic legs and
arms, etc—a careful review of the wide-ranging “special features”
section of the DVD of James Cameron’s Titanic is well worth their time.
_And
the truth is that since Cameron’s classic first appeared on the screen
in 1997—16 years ago—computer technology has grown by extraordinary
leaps and bounds, such that Cameron’s own remarkable visual graphics in
Titanic are, in many respects, almost extraordinarily antiquated by many
new developments in the field.
_In fact, the “special features”
section of virtually any DVD of any motion picture or television
drama—especially those involving a lot of action—often provide a literal
step-by-step videographic run-down of the amazing techniques of
film-making, in particular the amazing CGI—computer-generated
imagery—that has become so prevalent in even the most minimal ways that
the average viewer would never expect.
_For example, on the DVD of
the third season of the now-defunct crime drama,Body of Proof, one can
see how outdoor scenes (filmed in Los Angeles but supposedly taking
place in Philadelphia) are altered via CGI to eliminate palm trees from
the image that is finally seen by the television viewer. Another scene
deconstructed on that DVD demonstrates how the image (and sound) of a
railroad train moving through a railroad yard is completely erased by
CGI, such that all of the other action (and sound) taking place remains
undisturbed.
_In other words, film-making technology has reached such a highly-advanced level that:
_•
Virtually any scene or event can practically be conjured out of almost
thin air.What appears to be a human speaking and moving about may, in
fact, be a CGI, or even a robot with a talking, smiling human face
imposed by computer upon it.
_• Any piece of real film imagery can be
so altered that the final version of the film completely eliminates
action that did take place or altered to include action that actually
took place elsewhere and was then inserted by computer onto that
imagery.
_Now—when confronted with such realities about the nature of
film production and how quite ridiculous it is to suggest that Crisis
Actors engaged in such complex (and quite unnecessary) on-site antics in
Boston—a lot of red-faced truth seekers (who do realize they have been
conned) fall back on the claim that the high-level conspirators behind
Boston deliberately staged faulty video presentations that were easily
“refutable” because—they say—the conspirators actually wanted the
American people to know that the Boston bombing was a hoax.
_The apparent underlying theme here is that “Nothing is for real.
Everything
is a lie. And the people who are responsible for these lies actually do
want people to know that they are lies.That the people can do nothing
to combat this conspiracy that operates in tandem with the Controlled
Media in America.”
_That sounds good. It has a certain appeal to a
certain mindset. But it doesn’t reflect the reality that, in fact, most
Americans simply do not have any idea that the Internet is rife with
rumors about Crisis Actors.
_But what a growing number of Americans
do believe—as a consequence f propaganda from the Controlled Media—is
that those people who are called “conspiracy theorists” by the media
have some really crazy ideas and that they don’t believe that there was
really a shooting in Sandy Hook that took the lives of 20 little
children or that there wasn’t even really a bombing in Boston.
_And
many Americans now believe that anything that reeks of a conspiracy
theory—even relating to the JFK assassination or the Oklahoma bombing or
9-11—is the work of paranoid minds whose opinions are to be dismissed,
along with (in particular) the idea that Israel had anything to do with
those tragedies.
_That was precisely the design of those who helped
make the truth seekers look “crazy” by feeding them a diet of
extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook and Boston that took hold on the
Internet like wildfire, even as the Crisis Management Conspirators were
monitoring the communication networks between patriots here in the
United States (and around the world) who were disseminating these
stories.
_The bottom line is that what many came to believe about
Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston (along with other similar
nonsense) is just one big fat fraud—a lie—a distraction—deliberately
perpetrated by the Crisis Management Conspirators to make truth seekers
look silly. _The real “BIG STORY” that has not yet set in or been realized and understood is this:
_The
Crowd Control (and very real Mind Control) tactics—first laid out by
Cass Sunstein—have been successfully set in motion and the long-term
damage to serious inquiry into very real conspiracies—past and present
and those of the future—has been costly and inestimable.
_We can only
imagine what will happen when another very real crisis comes along and
wonder what kind of “management”—or mismanagement as the case may
be—will occur.We can only ponder the manner in which truth seekers will
be once again be utterly misdirected and further marginalized.
_What
happened with Sandy Hook and Boston is a very real lesson America’s
“alternative” media should learn from—before it’s too late.
VIDEO - Ry Gets a "Gift" in LA Alex Jones VS the German Death Cult of the Lucferian Illuminati
