C’est cet Esprit de Munich qui a imprégné l’attitude et la vision des dirigeants européens et du Président américain lors des pourparlers de Genève avec les Iraniens et qui a enfanté ce qui n’est même pas un accord, encore moins un traité, mais un texte intitulé « plan d’action conjoint ». (La solitude d'Israël: www.radioh2o.ca/la-solitude-disrael)
JTA---Zionist Organization of America: Iran deal is Munich, Obama is Chamberlain
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has described the agreement concluded over the weekend in Geneva between the P5+1 –– the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (Britain, China, France, Russia, the United States) and Germany –– and the Islamic Republic of Iran as an appeasement deal. This is our era’s new Munich and President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are the new Neville Chamberlains.
For PM and others, Israel is Czechoslovakia, Geneva is Munich, P5+1 are Chamberlain’s heirs and American Jews should now atone for Holocaust silence.
By Chemi Shalev | Nov. 11, 2013 | 10:58 PM | 
6
6
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, to paraphrase Groucho Marx, cannot accept any agreement that Iran has agreed to. Conversely, the only nuclear accord that Israel can live with is one that Tehran can’t.
Actually, nothing short of complete and utter dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure can convince Israel that the mullahs in Tehran have changed their ways. That Iran has given up its quest for nuclear weapons. That Tehran is no longer pursuing a bomb with which to achieve regional hegemony and to threaten Israel with extinction.
In his book “A Place Among The Nations,” Netanyahu wrote about the Iranian drive for nuclear weapons. In this very context, he noted that a “deep cultural and psychological distortion” of Islamic fundamentalism has turned it into a “cancerous tumor that threatens modern civilization”. You don’t treat cancer by reasoning with it. You need to stop it in its tracks, and then eradicate it altogether.
In Netanyahu’s eyes, Iran’s fanatic regime is no more capable of reversing its raison d’etre than the National Socialists were in Germany or the Bolshevik communists in the Soviet Union. The only realistic way of neutralizing the clear and present danger presented by Iran is by using the methods that worked so well against similar evil tyrannies in the past: subjugation or regime change or both. The Allies vanquished the Nazis by using brute military force, while the United States caused the collapse of the Soviet Union by bringing its overwhelming economic and technological superiority to bear.
It follows, therefore, that any accommodation with the ayatollahs is, by definition, weak-kneed appeasement, a clear indication of Western naiveté, an act of capitulation to rival Neville Chamberlain’s 1938 surrender to Adolf Hitler.
Declarations by Iranian President Hassan Rohani that Iran is not seeking a nuclear bomb are as worthless as Hitler’s signature on Chamberlain’s infamous “piece of paper” in which the two leaders proclaimed “their desire never to go to war with one another again.” And under the surface of U.S. pledges to safeguard Israel’s security one can hear distant echoes of Chamberlain’s blunt words to the British Parliament: “However much we may sympathize with a small nation confronted by a big and powerful neighbor, we cannot in all circumstances undertake to involve the whole British Empire in war simply on her account.”
Indeed, Netanyahu’s harsh reaction to reports of the impending agreement in Geneva were but an unrehearsed, gut-instinct rendition of a speech from which he is sure to quote if such a deal is ultimately concluded: “We have sustained a defeat without a war, the consequences of which will travel far with us along our road,” as Winston Churchill told the House of Commons a few days after the Munich Agreement was signed. And as he told Chamberlain: “You were given the choice between dishonor and war. You chose dishonor, but you will have war.”
The analogy may seem contrived, lopsided or farfetched to many and perhaps even most outside observers, but for Netanyahu, indeed for many Israelis, the concept of “Western Betrayal” has a deep and enduring resonance that is pertinent and prominent to this very day. In fact, its impact has probably increased exponentially in recent decades, as the Holocaust has claimed an ever-growing presence in Israel’s educational system, political discourse and national psyche.
The Munich precedent has consistently featured as a staple of Netanyahu’s core beliefs. In “A Place Among the Nations”, written in 1995, Netanyahu devotes significant space to the Hitler-Chamberlain analogy, comparing Israel to pre-War Czechoslovakia, Judea and Samaria to the German-speaking Sudetenland, a generic Arab monolith to Nazi Germany, and the Palestinian claims of human rights abuses and demand for self-determination to the irredentist provocations of the Sudeten Nazis led by Konrad Henlein.
“It is small wonder that like in other anti-Israeli schemes, the Arabs are implementing important chapters from the propaganda strategy of the Nazis,” Netanyahu wrote. “But what is surprising and disappointing is that fact that elitist circles in the West were quick to ‘swallow’ this transparent fraud.”
Unlike Menachem Begin, Netanyahu has made only rare public comparisons between Yasser Arafat and Hitler, but he was far less restrained when it came to the Iranian regime and former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In a 2006 Knesset speech, Netanyahu said that the Iranian president was even worse than the Nazi Fuehrer. "Hitler went out on a world campaign first, and then tried to get nuclear weapons. Iran is trying to get nuclear arms first. Therefore, from that perspective, it is much more dangerous," he said.
And if Iran is Nazi Germany, and its nuclear plans are but an updated version of the Final Solution, then it follows that U.S. Jews are now being given a chance to atone for their self-inflicted silence during the Holocaust. This was the undisguised gist of Netanyahu’s audacious “I will not be silenced” statement this week at the Jewish General Assembly in which he called on American Jews to fight the proposed deal in Geneva: “When the Jewish people were silent on matters relating to our survival, you know what happened. This is different,” he said.
That leaves U.S. President Barack Obama with a choice of alternatively being cast as history’s ultimate Patsy Chamberlain or as America’s thirty-second president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But this is not your Jewish grandfather’s FDR who saved the American economy from collapse and the world from Fascist domination. This is the FDR who “abandoned the Jews,” who succumbed to the anti-Semites in his midst, whose public image has been slowly evolving in recent years from being a hero of the Jews to a misguided leader who was callous about their tragic fate.
These will be the popular Israeli terms of reference, no matter what is ultimately concluded in a nuclear accord with Iran. Even under much improved stipulations, Netanyahu’s scrutiny of such an agreement will be filtered through a 75-year-old prism and a direct line will be drawn from Geneva to Munich and back.
Follow me on Twitter @ChemiShalev
Haaretz---Obama and Kerry's betrayal of 'never again'
What President Obama means when he says he has Israel's back is that he will partner with Israel's enemies behind its back, giving succor to a regime that operates against both Israel and the U.S.
By Seth Lipsky | Nov. 24, 2013 | 11:03 PM
“Never again” was the statement Menachem Begin made after sending a wave of F-16s against Iraq’s nuclear reactor. "There won't be another Holocaust in History. Never again."
Haaretz---Total, unmitigated defeat
President Obama had to choose between dishonor and war, and he chose dishonor. Now we will have war. He has dishonored US allies in the Middle East, including Israel and the Persian Gulf states, by abandoning their security concerns regarding a nuclear Iran by believing that appeasing Iran is the only way to avoid war.
These words are those of Churchill after the Munich Agreement was signed, when Britain and France believed that handing Czechoslovakia to Hitler was the only way to save the world from another war. It is regarded as the shameful culmination of the Allies refusal to confront Nazi aggression and gave Hitler what he wanted in exchange for his verbal promise of "peace in our time" as Chamberlain called it.After the Munich Agreement, Churchill gave a speech in the House of Commons on the future consequences to Europe and the world of the agreement which he called “total and unmitigated defeat." Following the Geneva agreement, these warnings ring as true now as they did then.
We cannot consider the abandonment of US allies only in the light of what happened the last few weeks. This agreement in Geneva is the culmination of the uninterrupted retreat of US power under Obama for the last five years in the Middle East. For five years, the president has been betraying Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE but accommodating enemies and tyrants like Syria’s Assad, Iran’s Khamenei, and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. (...)
US will not be trusted again
Obama, Kerry and other White House official’s panicky statements during the last two weeks that threatening to impose additional sanctions on Iran will be a "march to war" reassured the Iranians that Obama was desperate for any deal. US officials' defamatory attacks against legitimate Israeli concerns about a potential bad deal by calling them "war mongers" and keeping many of the details of the negotiations from them, as well as US reluctance to attack Syria, has told the Israelis that there is no longer any credible US military option against Iran.
Israel is not Czechoslovakia. Israel was abandoned by its ally but it is not broken and will never be silent. Israel is a nuclear power and can attack Iran on its own like it did against the Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors. The only obstacle is that Obama has tied Israeli hands for the next six months of negotiations. By then Iran will be a month away from building a bomb.
Knowing that Obama will never attack Iran militarily and will do his best to delay Israel from attacking Iran in time will have disastrous consequences to the Middle East.(...)
Key US Senate Republican Mark Kirk slammed the White House's push to
delay new sanctions against Iran on Wednesday, comparing the Obama
administration's actions to Neville Chamberlain’s “appeasement” of Nazi
Germany before World War II.
The Piper Report Dec 2, 2013
Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
Photo Djihad Watch (Robert Spencer) http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/11/obama-asks-netanyaho-to-take-a-breather-from-his-clamorous-criticism.html
A wild card in these negotiations is Israel. Obama has asked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to take a breather from his clamorous criticism
and send to Washington a team that can explore with U.S. officials a
sound end-state strategy. Perhaps the United States and Israel need a
back channel, outside the bombastic pressure campaign by Israeli
advocates…. (The Washington Post)
Report: Obama asks Netanyahu to 'take a breather' from vocal criticism of Geneva deal
Sparks Fly Tempers are wearing thin in Washington and Jerusalem over Iran — and the situation wasn’t helped by the recent Saban Forum where nasty sparks flew between leaders.
Both Obama, who spoke Saturday afternoon (video, transcript), and Kerry, who spoke Saturday evening (video, transcript), strongly defended the agreement with Iran signed November 24. And both took digs at Netanyahu’s sharp criticisms of the agreement, Obama in a jesting, almost mocking tone, Kerry in sharper tones. Kerry went through the agreement point by point, occasionally raising his voice in anger as he noted concessions won from Iran that reflected what Netanyahu had been calling for. Obama, by contrast, had a smile on his face through most of his 47-minute dialogue with forum backer Haim Saban. He drew frequent audience laughter, sometimes at Netanyahu’s expense, as when he referred to Netanyahu’s demand that Iran give up all enrichment capabilities.
Weekend at Haim's The annual Saban Forum brought together the highest ranking Israeli and American officials under one roof — but the event highlighted deep cracks in the relationship.
US president made comment during 2012 US election campaign, Double Down by Mark Halperin and John Heilmann reveals.
La revanche anti-Obama de Netanyahu? Netanyahu n'a pas l'intention de se laisser faire ! Dans la foulée de l'accord signé entre l'Iran et l'Occident qu'il qualifie d'"erreur historique", le PM sioniste prépare sa revanche . Tel-Aviv entend selon Times of Israel, faire tout son possible pour jeter le discrédit le plus total sur la personne d'Obama!
“The largest darkness that threatens the world today is a nuclear Iran,” he said, according to The Times of Israel.
“We are bound to do all we can to prevent this darkness. If possible we
will do this diplomatically, if not we will act as a light unto the
nations.” ([Bibi
Netanyahu] on Thursday evening in Israel, the prime minister vowed that
Israel was prepared to act, alone if necessary. Published in The Hill)
THE GREATEST danger Israeli Uri Avnery writes to Israel:
Stop the Netanyahu obsession. Embrace the Geneva deal. Call off the AIPAC bloodhounds from Capitol Hill. Mend the relations with the US administration. THE GREATEST danger to Israel is not the putative Iranian nuclear bomb. The greatest danger is the stupidity of our leaders.
Binyamin Netanyahu and almost the entire Israeli political establishment have achieved a new record in foolishness.
Don't like that Israel has the bomb? Blame Nixon
‘NYT’ and Wash Post won’t tell us why Dems are hurting Obama on Iran deal
The lobby is doing its utmost to sandbag the
breakthrough agreement between the U.S. and Iran. The Congress is now
readying yet more sanctions bills; the Forward says Democrats are
backing the legislation or doing nothing to oppose it because “These are
the men and the women, after all, who are on a first-name basis with
most of the board of AIPAC.” MJ Rosenberg says the Israel lobby is the
reason Sens. Tim Kaine, Sherrod Brown and– conspicuously– progressive
Elizabeth Warren have been silent on the diplomatic breakthrough. One
reason that supposed liberals can get away with this is that the
New York Times and the Washington Post give them no heat. In reporting
on the sanctions effort, our leading papers leave out the lobby’s role,
allowing the nightflower to remain a nightflower.
Obama takes aim at Israeli positions on Iran
Pro-Israel groups backing away from confrontation with Obama over Iran
Israel lobby urged not to confront Obama
TIMES OF ISRAEL - Israeli criticism of Iran deal ‘frustrating’ White House
US Official: Netanyahu ‘Desperate’ in Opposition to Iran Deal
Olmert: PM has ‘declared war on the US government’
Netanyahu: I will not ‘shut up’ when Israel’s interests are at stake
Israel: "Worse than a Nuclear Bomb"
Paraphrasing President Obama, Netanyahu said "Today the world has become a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world has taken a significant step toward attaining the most dangerous weapon in the world."
The Lobby vs. Obama
AIPAC Says Either Obama Backs Down on Iran Or Its War
Isolated Israel, angry with US, denounces Iran deal
Obama rejecting calls from Netanyahu amid tension over Iran
Administration dismissed Israeli intel on Iran’s nuke program as ‘misleading’
Obama asks senators to ignore Israel
Netanyahu says NPT is useless in Middle East BULLSHIT
ISRAELI HAWKS RESISTING DEALS To Benjamin Netanyahu and his Israeli stooges, any deal with Iran is “a bad deal.”
Israel said to be working with Saudi Arabia on Iran strike plan
The
two countries have both united in worry that the West may come to terms
with Iran, easing sanctions and allowing the Islamic Republic to
continue its nuclear program. According to the Sunday Times, Riyadh has
agreed to let Israel use its airspace in a military strike on Iran and
cooperate over the use of rescue helicopters, tanker planes and drones.
Report: Mossad working with Saudis on contingency plans for potential attack on Iran
The Israel Lobby Is Killing Iran Negotiations
Neocons Who Brought You The Iraq War Endorse AIPAC’s Iran Bill
Moline apologizes to American Jewish Committee, but not AIPAC Rabbi Jack Moline apologized for claiming that American Jewish Committee staffers had used “strong-arm tactics” in trying to persuade senators to back enhanced sanctions against Iran.
Jewish-American public leader raps AIPAC on lobbying for more Iran sanctions
American Rabbi Jack Moline, incoming director of the National Jewish
Democratic Council, said Friday that he thinks that some pro-Israel
groups are pushing too hard for the Senate to pass new sanctions on
Iran.
The US folded during negotiations in Geneva with Iran over its nuclear project, political sources in Israel charged on Saturday. They added that Israel was stunned when it learned over the weekend that a version of the deal being proposed was far worse than it believed.
Kerry tells senators to disregard Israeli reports on Iran
Sheftel: "US Secretary of State is the enemy of the Jews"
Kerry is Persona non grata: After betraying Israel, can Kerry be trusted as 'loyal' mediator in peace talks with Palestinians?
Israel Lobby Smears Kerry as Anti-Israel, Pro-Hamas; Questions His Conduct of Iran Talks
Republicans blast Kerry’s 'anti-Israeli' Senate briefing against new Iran sanctions
Poll: Israelis Don't Trust U.S. in Iran Talks
VIDEO - Rift developing between US, Netanyahu
Tempête diplomatique entre Israël et les États-Unis
Cracks in the Alliance: Is There Finally Daylight Between Israel and the US?
White House reportedly uneasy with Jewish lobbying in Congress
Obama Officials Urge Jewish Groups Not to Back New Iran Sanctions White House Representatives Called Measures 'Dangerous'
It’s Jew vs. Jew as Iran Sanctions Fight Gets Ugl
Joe Lieberman: Obama lacks coherent anti-terror plan
Feinstein: 'We Cannot Let Israel Determine When and Where the United States Goes to War'
AIPAC 'threatens many US senators' over Iran sanctions bill
Did AIPAC go too far in attacking Jewish lawmaker over Iran?
On se poserait même pas la question s'ils n'attaquaient que de vulgaires Goyim...
AIPAC’s open revolt against White House: Report
AIPAC GOES AFTER TOP DEM
A recent letter attacking Democratic National Committee Chairwoman
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is causing an internal brouhaha at the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee, The Cable has learned. (...) That AIPAC was driving hard for new Iran sanctions legislation
surprised no one. But its use of a right-wing blog to target a
well-connected Jewish Democrat with a long history of support for Israel
raised eyebrows among some current and former AIPAC officials. It also
raised concerns that AIPAC's open revolt against the White House's Iran
diplomacy could fray its relations with liberal Democrats on the Hill.
Obama and his administration should stay away from this year’s AIPAC Conference
It’s time to force AIPAC to choose between real bipartisanship and hawkish policies that Obama says could lead to war.
Will AIPAC-Obama sanctions clash dent pro-Israel lobby’s clout?On Iran sanctions, AIPAC faces an adversarial White House, reluctant Democrats and critical commentators.
Reversing course, AIPAC says now is not the time for new sanctions Ils reculent, c'est bon signe.
Obama and his administration should stay away from this year’s AIPAC Conference
It’s time to force AIPAC to choose between real bipartisanship and hawkish policies that Obama says could lead to war.
Will AIPAC-Obama sanctions clash dent pro-Israel lobby’s clout?On Iran sanctions, AIPAC faces an adversarial White House, reluctant Democrats and critical commentators.
Reversing course, AIPAC says now is not the time for new sanctions Ils reculent, c'est bon signe.
Israeli Minister Suggests Israel Will Attack Iran If U.S. Gets ‘A Bad Deal’
White House: Israel’s all-or-nothing proposal on Iran would lead to war
ULTRA JEW Cantor Seeks New House Resolution to Kill Iran Talks
Eric Cantor Girds His Iran War Loins
Cantor: US must not become complacent on Iran
Cantor cites pre-WWII isolation in pressing for greater U.S. engagement
Ce juif ultra juif orthodoxe, ultra sioniste et ultra dangereux pourrait déclencher la Troisième guerre mondiale. Cantor dirige la majorité républicaine au Congrès. Dans toute l'histoire des USA, jamais un juif ne s'est acquis autant de pouvoir et n'a tenu un aussi haut poste dans l'appareil d'état des États-Unis.
Israelis Back Netanyahu’s Belligerence on Iran
McCain: Netanyahu Has 'Serious Concerns' About Kerry's Plan
‘Netanyahu mouthpieces’ McCain and Graham crash Kerry’s Jerusalem party
Netanyahou au NYT : "Herzl et Churchill étaient plus isolés plus moi"
Winston Netanyahu
Mr. Netanyahu, Islam, Not Nazism, inspired Mufti of Jerusalem’s Jew-hatred
Is Netanyahu Certifiable? Though I am not an expert on the subject, it seems to me that what Netanyahu needs most of all is some psychiatric help.
Proche-Orient : le combat souterrain des sionistes religieux contre le plan Kerry
Ce groupe de pression s'inquiète d'un accord qui entraînerait le départ d'une partie des colons de Cisjordanie.
Knesset member implies Kerry guided by ‘anti-Semitism’ Leur bêtise n'a décidément aucune limite. Ils réalisent pas que leur excès de zèle les discrédite aux yeux du monde. En 2014, il n'y a plus grand monde qui les écoute et qui les prend au sérieux!
Bayit Yehudi MK: Kerry pressure on Israel has anti-Semitic undertones Ils vont toujours trop loin et n'ont aucun sens des proportions... disait le président Harry S. Truman.
Netanyahu Slams Kerry for Comment on Israeli Boycotts
Hypersensibilité épidermique et crise de paranoïa du côté d'Israël...
Israeli security minister slams Kerry over boycott threat, warns IDF may invade Gaza
Steinitz: Abbas 'most anti-Semitic' leader in world
Ils passent leur temps à se chercher des ennemis. Ils se lèvent le matin en disant: "bon, voyons qui c'est qui me déteste aujourd'hui..."
Scarlett Johansson, Israël, et les antisémites d'Oxfam, de BDS et de...
Rabbi Shore’s Clarion Project backs MeK
World War Z and the Wrath of Netanyahu
‘Understand
this–that Terminator is out there. It can’t be bargained with…it can’t
be reasoned with…It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear, and it
absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead…’
–Reese speaking to Sarah Conner in The Terminator
by Mark Glenn (2013)
Considering the seriousness of
what had just taken place, i.e. Benjamin Netanyahu’s infamous cartoon
bomb speech at the U.N. in September 2012, the reaction on the part of
the world was everything it should not have been, meaning mirth,
merriment, and ridicule…
The reason why this was the wrong
reaction is because–despite it resembling some strange political
episode from the cartoon strip Looney Tunes, nevertheless–there
was nothing funny about it. What the world had just witnessed–albeit
seemingly unbeknownst to all but a few—was a deadly-serious/high-level
gangster within La Kosher Nostra (with zero tolerance for being mocked)
threatening to blow up the world if his demands were not met viz a viz
increased war in the Middle East for Israel’s sake.
And now, over a year later, all can be rest assured that neither his intentions nor his mood have improved a bit.
In fact, quote the contrary,
given the fact that gasoline has been tossed onto the fire of
Netanyahu’s already raging fury with the following–
1. Obama (in effect an insolent,
ungrateful hired hand refusing to do as massa says) has been re-elected
to the presidency, despite Netanyahu’s very overt interference and
under-handed countermeasures.
2. A nuclear-armed Russia has
awoken from her hibernation, stepped into the Middle East situation with
all the poise and panache of a large, angry, territorially-protective
grizzly bear and in the process, brought strategic balance to an
otherwise chaotic situation in a manner not seen in decades.
And, last but not least–
3. After 34 years of
frosty-to-frigid relations between the U.S. and the Islamic Republic of
Iran, the data coming in from all functioning barometers and
thermometers indicates that the diplomatic and political weather between
the two countries is–in Beatlese– ‘gettin’ better all the time…’
And if all of this weren’t enough
in jostling and exacerbating Netanyahu’s already volcanic instability,
added to it is the fact that powerful players within his own ‘famiglia’
are working against him on a daily basis.
Yes, that’s right ladies and
gentilemen, an out-in-the-open gang war within La Kosher Nostra with
billions of innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire…
The reason for this
inter-familial conflict can be boiled down to one, primary item—the
continued survival of Jewish power at a time when the seeds of the
‘Gentile Spring’ have germinated and are beginning to grow. Day by day,
with the obvious meltdown of world order taking place and how much
(most) of this is traceable directly to this one troublesome, meddlesome
group of people and their control over the political, economic and
military machinery of the West, the magic spell is wearing off and the
deep sleep is coming to an end.
A flutter of the eyes, then a deep breath, and soon the Gentile giant is awake, conscious, and studying his surroundings…
And the smarter elements within
the syndicate understand the inherent danger this growing Gentile
awareness poses to the continued existence of their criminal empire.
They understand that a thief who makes too much noise during a midnight
burglary runs the risk of waking his sleeping victims and thus winding
up either shot dead or in jail.
Likewise, the more cautious
players within the gang understand that their history of thousands of
years of wandering from country to country, being expelled, jailed, and
vomited forth from every known civilized society could once again become
reality if things don’t ‘quiet down’.
And it is within this context
then that loudmouths such as Netanyahu become a liability and why—for
the good of La Kosher Nostra as a whole–it is important that he be shut
up lest the entire operation be shut down.
This best explains the full court
press taking place these days in forcing Bibi (the political equivalent
of the loud, brash and incautious Albert Anastasia from yesteryear’s
Murder Inc) to practice the code of silence lest by every utterance he
undo centuries of carefully calculated/carefully coordinated
brainwashing of the Gentile mind concerning the inherently
dangerous/inherently maniacal nature of Jewish power.
And the process by which certain
elements are attempting to cage this wild dog (and subsequently lull
back to sleep 7 billion Gentiles around the world) is by isolating,
marginalizing, mocking, demeaning and making irrelevant a man who—as
stated earlier—has zero tolerance for such treatment.
So, the long and short of it is
that Benjamin Netanyahu–a political mob boss in his own right, with a
black bag full of dirty tricks, an arsenal of nukes under his trench
coat and accustomed to getting his way before his demands have even
reached his lips–has certainly seen better days, and because he has seen
better days, so has the rest of the world.
In plain language, what this
means is that at no time in history has mankind faced the kind of real,
apocalyptic dangers it faces now. The human equivalent of the rabid dog
featured in Stephen King’s Cujo or the reality-based version of the T-101 cyborg featured in The Terminator,
Netanyahu is like some doomsday computer program plugged into the
world’s mainframe that cannot be rewritten, reformed or rehabilitated. A
true believer in the violent, rapacious, tribal narcissism making up
the foundation of his Judaic values, Nutty Netty is a mirrored
reflection of all those biblical warrior kings who preceded
him–remorseless, impervious to the magnetic pull of reason and
compassion, bereft of conscience and a law unto himself who has yet to
encounter a bloodbath of Gentiles—be it Passover, Purim or Operation
Cast Lead–that didn’t cause his salivary glands to go into overdrive.
Indeed, when considering this
creature, this wild animal in an expensive suit and his seemingly
insatiable thirst for human blood and the human suffering that
accompanies it, the cryptic question asked years ago concerning a
possible apocalyptic future for mankind becomes less puzzling–
‘Who is like this beast, and who can make war against him?…’
And it is within this light
therefore that certain assumptions can and need to be made concerning
this beast, his wrath and what can accurately be termed ‘World War Z’.
The first is that he is not
kidding. He is not cutting up or putting on. He is not auditioning for
some super-villain role in an upcoming adaptation of Superman, Wonder Woman or Spiderman. He really is as crazy as he appears and is perfectly content to see the world go up in ashes if his demands are not met–to the letter.
In truly Yahwehic fashion, his philosophy is ‘all or nothing’, which
means that if he can’t have it all, then the rest of the world gets
nothing.
The 2nd, (and probably more
painful statement) that has to be made is that as abnormal as all of
this appears, none of it is abnormal at all. There are not, or
rather—should not be—any ‘surprises’ associated with the rise of Jewish
power, the creation of the ‘Jewish state’ and the present World War Z
that mankind faces these days. Indeed, everything that has taken place,
particularly over the course of the last century viz a viz the wars,
the bloodshed and the nearly complete meltdown of established world
order was/is as predictable as the proverbial slaughter at the henhouse
after the jackals were put in charge of security.
The truth is that there is
nothing ‘new’ about the nature of Jewish power today vs that of
yesterday, except that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob did not have nukes,
biological weapons and control of the world’s money and media.
No, the sad truth is that
everything mankind needs to know about the deadly, radioactive nature of
this political, social and cultural ‘element’ on the periodic table of
human ideas has been sitting there, screaming out to civilized man for
literally thousands of years. Jewish power and violence, Jewish power
and genocide, Jewish power and economic despoliation, Jewish power and
corruption, none of this began in 1948 with the creation of Israel. It
did not begin in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve, as some
like to imagine.
It did not even begin with the
mafia murder of a carpenter from Nazareth or with the writing of a
literary abomination known as the Babylonian Talmud…
It—the criminal, barbaric nature
of Jewish power–has been there from the beginning, congenital from its
birth, the moment a penniless nomad begins hearing voices in his head
promising him kingdoms, riches and power beyond his wildest dreams,
accompanied by the moral justification for doing whatever needs to be
done in attaining these items, including lying, genocide, and theft.
In the aftermath of a long, destructive war between the various crime families in the New York region, the infamous scene in The Godfather features a semi-philosophical Vito Corleone asking the question ‘How did things get so far?…I don’t know…’
And as philosophical as his
question may have appeared to be for purposes of dramatic effect,
nevertheless the answer to it was/is a no-brainer.
Things got ‘so far’ because it
couldn’t be any other way. By its nature criminal thinking leads to
criminal activity and with it certain unavoidable byproducts, namely
violence, greed, betrayal, deception, vice, bloodshed, etc.
And likewise with the emergence of Jewish power in the affairs of the modern world–It simply could not have been any other way.
Everything that has taken place/is taking place/will take place has
within it the same certainty as water freezing at 32 F or boiling at
212. It’s as much a mathematical slam dunk as 2 and 2 equaling 4, over,
and over, and over, and whether the equation is posed once or a million
times, it will always be the same, without variation.
Modern forensics and DNA science
is such that the process of identifying/catching/convicting criminals is
oftentimes accomplished with something as small as a hair, a drop of
saliva, an eyelash, anything, for within that tiny spec of material can
be found all the answers necessary in understanding the who, what,
where, when, why and how of some criminal act.
And that being the case, one need
look no further than the DNA evidence left behind from the millions of
crime scenes where Jewish power has played a part in profiling,
identifying and convicting the source of the criminality–
“When the LORD your God
brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many
peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly
destroy them…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any
mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down
their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy
people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special
people above all others upon the face of the earth…”
–Book of Deuteronomy, 7:1-8
This, a mere spec of spiritual
DNA, a mere 94 words, contains all the information necessary in
understanding the pathology of Jewish power, what it was, what it is and
what it will always be. This, one tiny droplet amongst hundreds of
others, accurately and precisely profiles and identifies the source of
Jewish madness and criminality. It is in effect the radioactive milk
upon which psychopaths throughout history–including those such as
Netanyahu–have been nursed for thousands of years and with undeniably
deadly effects. It is an open secret, an open conspiracy and an open
declaration of war on the part of those who spiritually devour these
words and make them part of their inner beings like communicants at a
Black Mass and who then go forth and put into practice these precepts–to
invade, displace, mass murder, destroy, lie, show no mercy, destroy the
culture, debase the economy and to reduce every land they ‘possess’ to
utter ruination, the entire justification for which is that the Jewish
god Yahweh has demanded it.
And the tragedy, the crime—not of
just the century, but rather of the last 2 milleniae—is that it has
been there, in the open, for wise men to study and consider. Every
microbe, every millisecond, every millimeter of conflict that has
existed throughout history between Jew and Gentile, from biblical Egypt
to modern day Iran is explained and understood within those 94 words.
Benjamin Netanyahu and his army understand those words, their meaning, and have taken them to heart…
Perhaps, while there is time, the other side finding itself within this terrible conflict known as World War Z should do the same.
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
Anti-Iran House Members Work to Destroy Peace Deal
• Pro-Israel legislators work to slap more sanctions on Persia
White
House “ pushback” against an Iran sanctions bill is keeping the Senate
at bay. However, Roll Call, a Capitol Hill news outlet, reports that
hawkish House GOP leaders are considering taking up the Senate version
of the sanctions bill this month to pressure the Senate to act against
Iran.
The timing could hardly be worse, given the fact that diplomacy
is finally replacing war as a means of dealing with foreign powers that
do not bow to U.S. pressure. And in this case, a pact that six nations,
including the U.S., have reached with Iran aims to dismantle parts of
Iran’s nuclear-enrichment program without dropping bombs or sending in
the troops. That agreement is supposed to take effect Jan. 20.
The
discussion in the House by those who still want sanctions against Iran
“comes right after President Obama announced the first step in
amultilateral agreement mandating that beginning Jan. 20, Iran would
begin dismantling its higher-level uranium-enrichment infrastructure,”
Roll Call reported.
This latest announcement by Obama is what has
given senators further pause about moving sanctions legislation forward.
The House overwhelmingly passed its own sanctions bill last year, but
that waswell before diplomatic efforts yielded an agreement with Iran.
Given
the fact that, in a nearby arena, whatever chemical weapons Syria
actually possessed are being destroyed under an international
agreement—a process that also averted war against Syria—diplomacy is
again being given a reasonable chance. The surge of diplomacy hopefully
will become the rule, not the exception, at a time when the U.S. can no
longer afford to start wars around the world.
As Roll Call noted,
“Obama has threatened to veto any legislation implementing new
sanctions, claiming that it could jeopardize the diplomatic process.”
The
legislation’s backers argue that the mere threat of sanctions “would
give Obama and his diplomats an important bulwark in case Iran goes back
on the agreement.”
The deal has just a six-month duration to see how
things proceed. Would Congress even muster the required two-thirds vote
in both chambers to override Obama’s expected veto? That is not likely.
This
is a good time to call your House and Senate members and make sure
sanity prevails in this matter. The Capitol switchboard to reach any
legislator is 202-224-3121 or 225-3121.
Michael Collins Piper, The Golem
Chapter Twenty-Three
"New York Money People":
Jewish-Born American General
Points the Finger at the Warmongers
New
York money is not only playing a big part in 2008 presidential campaign
politics, but it's also a driving force behind the ongoing push by
pro-Israel fanatics at the highest levels of U.S. policy-making to force
the United States into a senseless war against Iran.
That's
the only conclusion that can be reached based on a survey of multiple
and wide-ranging news reports—circulating largely within publications in
Israel and in the American Jewish community—that have not been brought
to the attention of most Americans through the aegis of the so-called
"mainstream media."
It's almost as
if the major media in America is simply determined to prevent average
Americans from knowing that there are some people who believe that
Israel and its well-heeled backers in the United States are the primary
advocates for U.S. military action against Iran.
Perhaps
the most explosive comments in this regard came from Gen. Wesley Clark
(ret.), who was a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination
in 2004 and who—until then, at least—was considered a likely candidate
for the Democratic nod in 2008. In an interview with columnist Arianna
Huffington, Clark said that he believed that the Bush administration is
determined to wage war against Iran. When asked why he believed this,
Clark said:
You just have to read what's in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.
In
short, Clark was saying that powerful New York-based financial
interests (those whom he called "the New York money people") are putting
pressure on political candidates and incumbent politicians to support a
war against Iran.
In fact, Clark
was correct. Jewish community newspapers have indeed noted, time and
again over the past several years, that many in the American Jewish
community and in Israel are urging U.S. military action against Iran.
And in Israel, of course, the bellicose talk of Israel itself attacking
Iran is commonly and publicly discussed with free abandon. All of this
is little known to the American public.
Despite
this, Clark came under fire and was accused of "anti- Semitism" or
otherwise charged with lending credence to what are dismissed as
"anti-Israel and anti- Jewish conspiracy theories," which—Clark's angry
critics said—suggest that Israel and its supporters are prime movers
behind the drive for war.
Because
Clark is the son of a Jewish father (although he didn't know that until
several years ago, having been raised by a Christian mother and a
Christian step-father who never told Clark of his Jewish heritage), some
Jewish leaders were pulling their punches, recognizing that it sounded
somewhat outlandish to call Clark "anti-Jewish." But the word is
definitely out in the Jewish community: "Clark can't be trusted."
On
Jan. 12,2007, the New York-based Jewish newspaper, Forward, carried a
front-page story zinging Clark for his remarks, noting that,"The phrase
New York money people' struck unpleasant chords with many pro- Israel
activists. They interpreted it as referring to the Jewish community,
which is known for its significant financial donations to political
candidates."
The fact that Jewish
leaders and publications were attacking Clark for using the term "New
York money people" was ironic, inasmuch as just the week before the
furor over Clark's comments, the same Forward, in its own Jan. 5, 2007
issue, had a front-page story announcing that pro-Israel stalwart U.S.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) had lined up significant financial support
for his own 2008 presidential campaign from those whom—in its own
headline—Forward called "New York money men."
In
that revealing article, describing McCain's "heavily Jewish finance
committee," Forward announced that, in recent weeks, "McCain has been
signaling that an attention to Jewish issues will remain on his agenda
as his campaign moves forward." The Jewish newspaper did not mention
whether McCain will direct any attention to Christian, Muslim, Buddhist
or Hindu issues—or any other issues of concern to other religious
groups.
The article in Forward made
it clear that support from these "New York money men" is critical in the
forthcoming presidential campaign and that it could be pivotal, whether
that money stays in McCain's camp or ultimately goes elsewhere.
This
information could prove a surprise to grass-roots Republicans all over
America who think (apparently incorrectly) that they are the ones who
actually pick their party's presidential nominee.
In
addition, in light of the fact that Jewish groups attacked Clark for
suggesting that "New York money people" were pressuring political
candidates to push for war against Iran, it is interesting to note that
Forward pointed out that one of the key "New York money men" supporting
McCain cited the issue of Iran as one of the reasons why he was boosting
the Arizona senator.
Dr. Ben
Chouake, who is president of the pro-Israel NORPAC, a political action
committee, and a member of McCain's finance committee, was cited as
having remarked that Iran is "an immense threat to the United States,
and this is an immense threat to Israel," and that "the person that is
the most capable, most experienced, most courageous to defend our
country, would be John McCain."
Clearly,
the "New York money people" are playing a major part in the American
political arena, throwing their weight behind who gets elected— and who
doesn't—and whether or not America goes to war.
That's something that Americans need to know about, but they had better not count on the mass media to tell them about it.
Michael Collins Piper, YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH
(...)
NSA spying revelations boost calls for Pollard’s release
Disclosures
that American intelligence monitored the emails of two former Israeli
prime ministers has prompted a new round of calls for clemency for
Jonathan Pollard.
US spying ‘gives ammunition’ to Netanyahu to derail Obama agenda
Sur ce blog:
Le jeu des devinettes: qui a dit: "Si je suis réélu je vais foutre les juifs"
Le jeu des devinettes: à qui aurait bien pu profiter la mort d'Arafat?
Assassinat de JFK: C'était pas les nazis
Après JFK et Obama, au tour de l'Onu de demander à Israël d'ouvrir ses installations nucléaires aux inspections
Le "méchant" Vlad Poutine en remplacement du "méchant" Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
Chavez aurait vite démasqué ce nouveau Pape casher infiltré dans le monde hispanique
Le réseau criminalisé Netanyahou-Adelson-Romney
Moins d'argent juif de New York pour Obama, plus d'argent juif de Las Vegas pour Romney
La guerre en Irak était une célébration de Pourim!
Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale
La Judée déclare la guerre à l'Allemagne
The Jewish War of Survival
L'Option Samson comme "justice ultime"
Guerres sionistes: vers la délivrance finale
