Réponse: Rudy Giuliani et Bibi Netanyahou. Deux bons amis.
Par ailleurs, le matin des attentats du 11 septembre, le mafieux notoire Rudy Giuliani était à New York, dont il était maire.
Chossudovsky:
(...) Foreknowledge of the 7/7 Attack?
According to a report of the Associated Press correspondent in Jerusalem, the Israeli embassy in London had been advised in advance by Scotland Yard of an impending bomb attack: Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.(AP, 7 July 2005) Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was warned by his embassy not to attend an attend an economic conference organized by the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) in collaboration with the Israeli embassy and Deutsche Bank. Netanyahu was staying at the Aldridge Hotel in Mayfair. The conference venue was a few miles away at the Great Eastern Hotel close to the Liverpool subway station, where one of the bomb blasts occurred.
Rudolph Giuliani’s London Visit
Rudolph Giuliani, who was mayor of New York City at the time of the 9/11 attacks, was staying at the Great Eastern hotel on the 7th of July, where TASE was hosting its economic conference, with Israel’s Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as keynote speaker. Giuliani was having a business breakfast meeting in his room at the Great Eastern Hotel, close to Liverpool Street station when the bombs went off:
“I didn’t hear the Liverpool Street bomb go off,” he explains. “One of my security people came into the room and informed me that there had been an explosion. We went outside and they pointed in the direction of where they thought the incident had happened. There was no panic. I went back in to my breakfast. At that stage, the information coming in to us was very ambiguous.” (quoted in the Evening Standard, 11 July 2005.)
Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Rudolph Giuliani knew each other. Giuliani had officially welcomed Netanyahu when he visited New York City as Prime Minister of Israel in 1996. There was no indication, however, from news reports that the two men met in London at the Great Eastern. On the day prior to the London attacks, July 6th, Giuliani was in North Yorkshire at a meeting. (...)
The Mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, was organising a ‘terror drill’ called Tripod II sat New York’s Pier 92. It was modelled on a biochemical attack upon New York citizens, and was scheduled for the two days of the 11th and 12th September. As the events of 9/11 unfolded, Giuliani found himself well able to co-ordinate rescue events from that pier, because ‘the equipment was already there’ for establishing a command centre. His terror drill had mysteriously synchronised with the real thing (1). In the weeks following, Giuliani ordered that all the steel wreckage of the twin towers be swiftly removed, without allowing experts to analyse it, as would have given an indication of how the towers had fallen; and he further gave the order that any photography around ‘ground zero’ was illegal.(...)
The Day of July 7th 2005
8.43am
Mossad office in London was alerted to a pending terror strike, 6 minutes before the first explosion (8). Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (who had been calling for war with Iran) happened to be staying in a hotel close to one of the bomb blasts, for a Deutsche Bank and Tel Aviv Stock Exchange conference. Sometime between 8:43am and 9:15am he was warned not to go out due to a possible terrorist attack. He (and the Israeli Embassy) originally said that it was Scotland Yard who called in the warning, but they later denied this. London’s Mossad office has not clarified from whom they received this warning (9).(...)
8.50am
(...)Rudolph Giuliani, who was mayor of New York City at the time of the 9/11 attacks, was staying at the Great Eastern hotel, close to Liverpool Street station, when the bombs went off. That was where a Tel Aviv Stock Exchange conference was due to begin, with Israel's Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as keynote speaker. Earlier, as Israel’s Prime Minister back in 1996, Netanyahu had been officially welcomed to New York City by Giuliani. After quitting as Mayor of New York, Giuliani had set up the firm ‘Giuliani Security and Safety,’ and this specialized in "mock terror drills" and "emergency preparedness," just like Peter Power’s ‘Visor Consultants.’ The two companies enjoyed business contacts in these areas (10). After being told of the blasts, Giuliani went back to his hotel, to finish his breakfast.
Le Mossad comme toujours informé avant les attentats:
(IsraelNN.com) Army Radio quoting unconfirmed reliable sources reported a short time ago that Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred.
The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address an economic summit.
At present, train and bus service in London have been suspended following the series of attacks. No terrorist organization has claimed responsibility at this time.
Israeli officials stress the advanced Scotland Yard warning does not in any way indicate Israel was the target in the series of apparent terror attacks.
One of many Israeli Urban Moving Systems vans stopped in New York City on 9/11
On
the day of the September 11, 2001 attacks, former Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked how they could affect Israeli-U.S.
relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good.......Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)".
An article by reporter Jim Galloway, published on The Austin American-Statesman on Nov. 25, 2001, stated that
the FBI had evidence suggesting that the Mossad, the Israeli
intelligence, along with some rogue American and foreign spy agencies,
may be deeply involved in or even entirely responsible for the Sept. 11
attacks as well as other acts of terrorism against the United States.
According to Galloway, 100 of the 1,100 foreigners arrested by the FBI for suspicion of involvement in the 9/11 attacks were Israeli Jews.
In fact, a Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of
themselves on the day of the attacks. Five of the Israelis were arrested
after "angry witnesses had seen the five at a waterfront park in New
Jersey apparently laughing and clowning, and photographing themselves in
front of the burning towers." One witness told police at the time that
the men "were like happy, you know ... They didn't look shocked to me."
According to ABC's 20/20, when police stopped the cheering Israelis, one of them told the officers: "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem".
One of the five Israelis had a German passport in addition to his
Israeli passport. Another had an international flight booked to Thailand
on September 13, two days after the attacks. The FBI also found out
that one of them was a former paratrooper, assigned to an elite Israeli
defense forces unit.
Two more Israelis were caught in a truck on Interstate 80 in
Pennsylvania, near the site of the crash of American Airlines flight 93.
Police became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with
certain locations highlighted, box cutters (like the ones used by the
hijackers), along with other incriminating evidence. Police also said
that bomb sniffing dogs reacted as if they smelled explosives when they
were brought to the Israelis' truck.
The FBI believes that most of the arrested Israelis belong to an Israeli intelligence unit operating outside New Jersey, near where the Anthrax letters were mailed. They all worked for a U.S.-based company known as Urban Moving Systems.
An editorial on whatreallyhappened.com states that an FBI SWAT team
raided the New Jersey warehouse of the Urban Moving Systems and
confiscated a number of computer hard drives and files. It further adds
that the Israeli owner of the company, Dominick Suter, closed his
business days after the Sept. attacks and returned to Israel. He was in
such a hurry that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with
their furniture stranded in storage facilities.
Behind closed doors, Israeli authorities were doing all what they can to
get the men released and the FBI probe closed. Israeli lawmakers
contacted their "friends" in the U.S. Congress, and the Mayor of
Jerusalem, Ehud Ohmert personally called the New York City Mayor Rudy
Giuliani and asked him to intervene.
An article on Power of Prophecy reported that a war brewed inside the
FBI between the agents conducting the probe and their superiors, who
warned that involving the Israelis in the attacks could be an "explosive
political volcano." But the lower-level agents didn't buy it. They
believed that the arrested Israeli Jews might just hold the key to the
whole 9/11 debacle. "These Israeli guys knew what was coming down," one
FBI veteran was quoted as saying. "We would be fools if we let them just
fade away into the sunset and pretend they weren't involved."
It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact
Mossad agents. However, FBI and Justice Department superiors succeeded
in pushing aside the local FBI agents and the Israelis were released
after spending just 71 days in U.S. custody. "Evidence linking these
Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that
has been gathered. It's classified information," a U.S. official told
Fox News at the time.
The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli
connection. Rather it immediately blamed OSAMA BIN LADEN even though he
had no record of doing anything on this scale. On the day of the
attacks, CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's
fingerprints all over it."
But a number of intelligence officials have raised questions about BIN
LADEN's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's
running this operation?" one CIA official said at the time. "It's so
huge. He couldn't have done it alone."
BIN LADEN himself denied any involvement in the attacks. The BBC
published his denial in which he clearly stated: "I was not involved in
the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge
of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the
United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators
of these attacks within itself..." (Most of us never heard that quote on
our nightly newscast).
To date, the only shred of "evidence" against bin Laden is a barely
audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find
"lying around" in Afghanistan.
U.S. intelligence analysts believe that Israel benefited most from the
September 11 attacks. Israel has been widely criticized by the West for
its aggression against the Palestinians. Israeli occupation soldiers
were, and still are, shown on international TV news in heated exchanges
with Palestinian youths armed with nothing more than stones. Israeli
tanks bulldoze Palestinian farms and homes, and human rights groups
complain that Palestinian detainees are tortured and abused in Israeli
jails.
But after 9/11, things changed dramatically. Sympathy for the
Palestinians vanished. The Arabs were universally portrayed as the "bad
guys." Israeli Prime Minister ARIEL SHARON reportedly said: "Now we and the Americans are in the same fight."
An article by political analyst Richard Becker published on Jan. 9, 2003
on the Workers World newspaper states that "SHARON and other Israeli
leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political ZIONIST
movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of
historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of
the ZIONIST ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, 'A land without
people for a people without a land.'"
The implication of the Arabs in the 9/11 attacks provided the Israelis
with a golden opportunity to achieve the above-stated goals because the
world would view the Palestinians as terrorists.
Blaming the horrible attacks on the Arabs was the best thing that has
even happened to Israel. Now Washington, once again, solidly stands in
the pro-Israeli camp, and "Palestinians be damned!"
Des liens entre des attentats à Tel-Aviv et l'attentat du 7/7 à Londres?
German newspaper: Explosive material used by British terrorist who blew himself up on Tel Aviv beachfront in 2003 very likely the same as that used by terrorists who staged London attacks last week, Mossad tells Brits
TEL AVIV – The terror attack in London last week may be tied to a suicide bombing on Tel Aviv’s beachfront in April 2003, German newspaper Bild am Sonntag reported Monday.
According to the paper, Mossad officials informed British security authorities that the explosive material used in the Tel Aviv attack on Mike’s Place pub was apparently also utilized to stage the series of bombings in London on Thursday.
Moreover, the Mossad office in London received advance notice about the attacks, but only six minutes before the first blast, the paper reports. (...)
Rappel : Bibi a "prédit" les attentats du 11 septembre au WTC dans son livre de 1995 sur la guerre de l'Occident contre le terrorisme:
(...) NETANYAHU: Well, I was getting this question in the 1990s, and I said that the West really doesn`t understand militant Islam. So I wrote a book in 1995, and I said that, if the West doesn`t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam is bringing down the World Trade Center. (...)
2001: Les ingénieurs structurels disent que la décision de recycler rapidement l'acier du WTC était une «grave erreur» qui handicape l'enquête. Dr Frederick W. Mowrer, professeur agrégé au département d'ingénierie de protection contre les incendies à l'Université du Maryland, déclare: "Je trouve que la rapidité avec laquelle tous les éléments de preuve potentiellement importants ont été retirés et recyclés est épouvantable." Le maire Rudy Giuliani est soupçonné d'être derrière la décision, mais des responsables de la mairie ne répondent pas aux questions écrites et orales demandant qui a décidé de recycler l'acier.(...)
Ce ne sont pas des musulmans qui ont fournit un avertissement avant les attaques
du 7 juillet à Londres. Ce sont plutôt
Benjamin Netanyahou et
le Mossad.
À ceux qui ont cru qu'elle rigolait, elle a répondu que ce n'était pas de l'humour du tout, car "l'usure et les suceurs de sang" ont été immortalisés dans les plus grands chefs d'oeuvre de la littérature.
Elle a parfaitement compris le problème des "Shylock"...
Argentina’s Jews riled by President Kirchner’s ‘Merchant of Venice’ comments The president has made some uncomfortable tweets about Shylock and aggressive investment funds. Kirchner compares debt crisis to ‘Merchant of Venice’. Argentina's Jews riled after president likens aggressive investment funds to Shakespeare’s Shylock.
Kirchner evokes Shylock in talk of Argentina’s financial woes
Argentine President Cristina Kirchner made
an anti-Semitic remark during a visit to a high school that has
infuriated the Jewish community in Argentina.
Last week, Kirchner said that in order to
understand the economic situation in the country, pupils should read
Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, a play by the Bard where Jews are
described as scheming, vindictive, greedy money-lenders.
According to Haaretz, Israeli officials are aware of the comments, but has so far avoided responding to the incident.
Kirchner toured Lugano on Thursday, a poor
neighborhood of Buenos Aires which was instrumental in helping
Kirchner’s preferred mayoral candidate. She then tweeted the main points
of her speech. Kirchner has more than 2 million followers on Twitter.
In one of her tweets, she recounted how she
asked children she met which Shakespeare play they were reading. The
answer: Romeo and Juliet. “I said, have you read The Merchant of Venice
to understand the vulture funds. They all laughed,” she tweeted.
“No, don’t laugh. Usury and the bloodsuckers
were immortalized by the best literature for centuries,” she wrote in
another tweet.
Cuando pregunté que obra de Shakespeare estaban leyendo, me dijeron Romeo y Julieta…
Vulture funds are funds that deliberately
invest in companies or properties that perform poorly and may therefore
be undervalued. They buy the debts cheaply, then sue the debtors,
usually governments, for a higher price.
Argentina is trying to pay back debts to several such American-owned funds.
Kirchner’s connection between the funds and
the play evokes a well-known anti-Semitic trope: that Jews control the
world’s finances. By extension, her words could be understood as
implying Argentina’s financial woes are the fault of the Jews.
The umbrella organization of Argentine Jews issued a statement expressing disdain with Kirchner’s comments.
She did not apologize. Instead, on July 5 she
posted two tweets showing the program notes and an invitation from the
Israeli Embassy in Spain to a production of the play by Habima, Israel’s
national theater.
“The piece? The Merchant of Venice. The
company producing? Habima, Israel’s national theater,” she tweeted. And
in a consecutive tweet: “Who’s inviting? The Israeli Embassy in Spain.
Notably, in Israel they like good literature and the best theater.”
“Goodness. Someone deserves the donkey’s head, as Shakespeare did in A Midsummer Night’s Dream,” she wrote.
Le fond de l'aventure qui fait le sujet du Marchand de Venise se
retrouve dans les chroniques ou dans la littérature de tous les pays,
tantôt en entier, tantôt dépouillé de l'épisode très-piquant qu'y
ajoutent les amours de Bassanio et de Portia. Un jugement pareil à celui
de Portia a été attribué à Sixte V qui, plus sévère, condamna, dit-on, à
l'amende les deux contractants, pour les punir de l'immoralité d'un
pareil marché. En cette occasion il s'agissait d'un pari, et le juif
était le perdant. Un recueil de nouvelles françaises, intitulé
Roger-Bontemps en belle humeur, raconte la même aventure, mais à
l'avantage du chrétien, et c'est le sultan Saladin qui est le juge. Dans
un manuscrit persan qui rapporte le même fait, il s'agit d'un pauvre
musulman de Syrie avec qui un riche juif fait ce marché pour avoir les
moyens de le perdre et parvenir ainsi à posséder sa femme dont il est
amoureux; le cas est décidé par un cadi d'Émèse. Mais l'aventure tout
entière se trouve consignée, avec quelques différences, dans un
très-ancien ouvrage écrit en latin et intitulé: Gesta Romanorum, et dans
le Pecorone de ser Giovanni, recueil de nouvelles composé avant la fin
du quatorzième siècle et par conséquent très-antérieur à Sixte V, ce qui
rend tout à fait improbable l'anecdote rapportée sur ce pape par
Grégoire Léti. Dans la nouvelle de ser Giovanni, la dame de Belmont
n'est point une jeune fille forcée de soumettre son choix aux conditions
prescrites par le singulier testament de son père, mais une jeune veuve
qui, de sa propre volonté, impose une condition beaucoup plus
singulière à ceux que le hasard ou le choix fait aborder dans son port.
Obligés de partager le lit de la dame, s'ils savent profiter des
avantages que leur offre une pareille situation, ils obtiendront avec la
possession de la veuve sa main et tous ses biens. Dans le cas
contraire, ils perdent leur vaisseau et son chargement, et repartent
sur-le-champ avec un cheval et une somme d'argent qu'on leur fournit
pour retourner chez eux. Peu effrayés d'une pareille épreuve, beaucoup
ont tenté l'aventure, tous ont succombé; car, à peine dans le lit, ils
s'endorment d'un profond sommeil, d'où ils ne se réveillent que pour
apprendre le lendemain que la dame plus matinale a déjà fait décharger
le navire, et préparer la monture qui doit reconduire chez lui le
malencontreux prétendant. Aucun n'a été tenté de renouveler une
entreprise si chère, et dont le mauvais succès a découragé les plus vifs
aspirants. Le seul Gianetto (c'est dans la nouvelle le nom du jeune
Vénitien) s'est obstiné, et après deux premières déconvenues, il veut
risquer une troisième aventure: son parrain Ansaldo, sans s'inquiéter de
la perte des deux premiers vaisseaux dont il ignore la cause, lui en
équipe un troisième, avec lequel Gianetto lui promet de réparer leurs
malheurs. Mais épuisé par les précédentes entreprises, il est obligé
pour celle-là d'emprunter à un juif la somme de dix mille ducats, aux
mêmes conditions que celles qu'impose Shylock à Antonio. Gianetto
arrive, et, averti par une suivante de ne pas boire le vin qu'on lui
présentera avant de se mettre au lit, il surprend à son tour la dame
qui, fort troublée d'abord de le trouver éveillé, se résigne cependant à
son sort, et s'estime heureuse de le nommer le lendemain son époux.
Gianetto, enivré de son bonheur, oublie le pauvre Ansaldo jusqu'au jour
fatal de l'échéance du billet. Un hasard le lui rappelle alors; il part
en diligence pour Venise, et le reste de l'histoire se passe comme l'a
représenté Shakspeare. On conçoit aisément la raison et la nécessité des
divers changements qu'il a fait subir à cette aventure; elle n'était
cependant pas tellement impossible à représenter de son temps sur le
théâtre qu'on ne puisse croire qu'il a été induit à ces changements par
le besoin de donner plus de moralité à ses personnages et plus d'intérêt
à son action. Aussi la situation du généreux Antonio, la peinture de
son caractère si dévoué, courageux et mélancolique à la fois, ne
sont-elles pas l'unique source du charme qui règne si puissamment dans
tout l'ouvrage. Les lacunes que laisse cette situation sont du moins si
heureusement remplies qu'on ne s'aperçoit d'aucun vide, tant l'âme est
doucement occupée des sentiments qui en naissent naturellement. Il
semble que Shakspeare ait voulu peindre ici, sous leurs différents
points de vue, les premiers beaux jours d'un heureux mariage. Le
discours de Portia à Bassanio, au moment où le sort vient de décider en
sa faveur, et où elle se regarde déjà comme son heureuse épouse, est
rempli d'un abandon si pur, d'une soumission conjugale si touchante et
si noble à la fois, que son caractère en acquiert un charme
inexprimable, et que Bassanio, prenant dès cet instant la situation
supérieure qui lui convient, n'a plus à craindre d'être rabaissé par
l'esprit et le courage de sa femme, quelque décidé que soit le parti
qu'elle va prendre l'instant d'après; on sait maintenant que, le moment
de la nécessité passé, tout rentrera dans l'ordre, et que les grandes
qualités qu'elle saura soumettre à son devoir de femme ne feront
qu'ajouter au bonheur de son mari. Dans une classe subordonnée, Lorenzo
et Jessica nous donnent le spectacle de ce tendre badinage de deux
jeunes époux si remplis de leur bonheur qu'ils le répandent sur les
choses les plus étrangères à eux-mêmes et jouissent des pensées et des
actions les plus indifférentes, comme d'autant de portions d'une
existence que le bonheur envahit tout entière. Cet entretien de Lorenzo
et de Jessica, ce jardin, ce clair de lune, cette musique qui prépare le
retour de Portia, de Bassanio, et l'arrivée d'Antonio, disposent l'âme à
toutes les douces impressions que fera naître l'image d'une félicité
complète, dans la réunion de Portia et de Bassanio au milieu de tous les
amis qui vont jouir de leurs soins et de leurs bienfaits. Shakspeare
est presque le seul poète dramatique qui n'ait pas craint de s'arrêter
sur le tableau du bonheur; il sentait qu'il avait de quoi le remplir.
L'invention des trois coffres, dont l'original se trouve aussi en
plusieurs endroits, existe, à peu près telle que l'a employée
Shakspeare, dans une autre aventure des Gesta Romanorum, si ce n'est que
la personne soumise à l'épreuve est la fille d'un roi de la Pouille
qui, par la sagesse de son choix, est jugée digne d'épouser le fils de
l'empereur de Rome. On voit par là que ces Gesta Romanorum ne remontent
pas précisément aux temps antiques. Le caractère du juif Shylock est
justement célèbre en Angleterre. Cette pièce a été représentée avant
1598. C'est ce qu'on sait de plus certain sur sa date. Plusieurs pièces
sur le même sujet avaient déjà été mises au théâtre; il avait été aussi
le fond de plusieurs ballades. En 1701, M. Grandville, depuis lord
Lansdowne, remit au théâtre le Marchand de Venise, avec des changements
considérables, sous le titre du Juif de Venise. On l'a joué longtemps
sous cette nouvelle forme. ...
Étonnamment, même certains médias de Corée du Sud ont compris:
South Korea media repeat anti-Semitic canards ahead of merger vote
“Jews are known to wield enormous power on Wall Street and in global
financial circles,” according to a column on a South Korean news
website. “It is a well-known fact that the U.S. government is swayed by
Jewish capital.”
Juifs : pourquoi tant de haine ? Du Nouveau Testament à Goebbels en passant
par Shakespeare et même Marx, pourtant d'origine juive, les mêmes
clichés ont participé à l’extension de la calomnie.
Ce n'est pas la première fois que la présidente de l'Argentine a des problèmes avec cette communauté...
July 2013 | Jewish ex-Argentina minister faces probe in bombing Carlos Vladimir Corach allegedly paid $400,000 to an auto mechanic who provided the car bomb that blew up AMIA Jewish center ed
note–So, an Argentine Jew is said to have paid off someone to bomb the
AMIA Jewish Center in Buenos Aires in 1994 for which Iran was blamed.
Argentina and Iran then sign a memorandum of understanding to open the
case and investigate it and Jewish groups the world over are pissing
their pants in the process?
ed note–most would view this
as a diversionary statement from Israel done in the interests of making
it appear that the Israeli narrative concerning ‘Iran and Hezbollah’
being responsible for the bombing of the AMIA center in Buenos Airies is
more believable.
The fact is though that there
may be some truth to this, as it is standard Mafia.Mossad practice to
kill the perpetrators of crimes such as these in order to leave a cold
evidence trail. As former Mossad Victor Ostrovsky wrote in his book The
Other Side of Deception in speaking about Israel’s planned
assassination of Pres. George H.W. Bush at the Madrid Peace Talks in
1992:
"Since the Mossad had all
the security arrangements in hand, it would not be a problem bringing
the killers as close as they wanted to President Bush and then staging
his assassination. In the ensuing confusion, the Mossad people would kill the ‘perpetrators,’
scoring yet another victory for the Mossad. With the assassins dead, it
would be difficult to discover where the ‘security breach’ had been,
except that several countries involved in the conference, such as Syria,
were regarded as countries that assisted terrorists."
Réactions juives: "complot!" "Pas un suicide!" "Le gouvernement, complice de l'Iran, l'a suicidé" Alberto Nisman committed suicide? Let’s kill that lie Op-ed: Let nobody
be fooled into thinking that the prosecutor who was about to testify
against Argentina’s president chose to end his own life. And let nobody
buy the second big lie now being spread: That the AMIA case has not been
solved. It has. Iran was to blame Read more: Alberto Nisman committed
suicide? Let's kill that lie
Thousands Protest 'Suicide' of Argentina Prosecutor Alberto Nisman
Amid Terror Probe President Voices 'Astonishment' at Mysterious Death
We’re All Nisman: Demonstrators rally against the government in
Argentina after the death of prosecutor Alberto Nisman.
Les juifs
sont inquiets. Le Mossad a probablement été obligé de liquider le gars
parce qu'il s'était mis dans la merde et allait se faire arrêter par les
méchants policiers argentins, alors valait mieux s'en débarrasser pour
éviter un scandale aurait atteint une ampleur mondiale, levant le voile
sur l'utilisation du false flag par Israel. Et quoi de mieux que de
laisser planer le doute sur un possible assassinat par les services
secrets argentins? Encore du false flag, cette fois pour éliminer un
complice. Les juifs devraient comprendre que même eux et pas seulement
les bons goyim sionistes, risquent d'être jetés après usages.
You’ve
heard about the “controversial” Passion Play of Oberammergau,
which inspired Mel Gibson’s blockbuster film, The
Passion of the Christ. Now, the uncensored and traditional
rendition of the Passion Play is available in a beautiful new volume
that preserves a relic of Christian history that so many enemies
of Christianity would love to see buried forever.
This volume is a early 20th century English-language descriptive
account of the Passion Play at Oberammergau as compiled in 1910.
UNADULTERATED
At right, the cover of The
Passion Play at Oberammergau from the National
Institute for Christian Solidarity — an uncensored
account of the Passion Play before the ADL had it
altered to meet its “political
correctness” standards.
There is nothing like it available anywhere else.
It’s like reading a thrilling, colorful and epic novel.
Not only does this rendition of the play accurately
reflect the traditional script of the play, but it also incorporates
verbal imagery to describe what is happening in the play itself.
This volume — the traditional, uncensored rendition of the
Passion Play — survives as a record of what was and what is:
the Passion of the Christ that is so central to the Christian faith.
In fact, this volume is actually a more accurate rendition of the
original Passion Play as it was presented from its original offering
in 1634 and up until the 1980 presentation. In 1980, under pressure
from Jewish critics, revisions were made in the play, laying the
groundwork for additional changes in 1990 and in the “new”
— even more censored — version in 2000.
The history of the play itself is quite remarkable. Presented by
the townspeople of Oberammergau, a small community in Bavaria in
southwestern Germany, a town of hardly more than 5,000 souls, it
has been staged 40 times — every ten years (with multiple
presentations on a periodic basis over several months) — since
its premier on Pentecost in the year 1634.
Here’s how it began: In the middle of the Thirty Years War,
after months of suffering and death from the plague, the Oberammergauers
swore an oath that they would perform the “Play of the Suffering,
Death and Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ” every ten
years. At Pentecost 1634, they fulfilled their pledge for the first
time on a stage in a cemetery — above the fresh graves of
the plague victims.
The production of the play became a major project for the entire
village, young and old alike involved. The villagers spent vast
time and energy building sets, preparing elaborate historic costumes,
rehearsing their parts, making the Passion Play a community event
in the grandest sense of the word: the play has had the proverbial
“cast of thousands,” with as many as 2,200 people participating—
almost half the people of Oberammergau.
Some who started out playing sideline roles ultimately came to play
major parts themselves. Some “passed down” particular
roles from father to son and mother to daughter. Every man wearing
a beard in the play had to have a real beard. Participants went
to great efforts to maintain their beards in preparation for the
play.
As years went by, word about the play spread across Europe. Growing
numbers came — almost as a pilgrimage — every time the
play was presented. By the late 19th century, audience members came
from around the globe. The Passion Play was emerging as a legend
in its own time.
However, as the 20th century dawned, the steadfast commitment of
the Oberammergauers was confronted by outsiders with an agenda all
their own. Virtually all of the opposition to the Passion Play came
from the outspoken leadership of Jewish circles, particularly in
the United States. These critics of the Passion Play worked relentlessly
to defame it.
The six hour play was last presented in 2000. The next scheduled
presentations will be in the 2010 — unless, of course, the
play’s critics — including Abe Foxman’s ADL —
finally succeed in shutting it down altogether. In recent decades
as many as 500,000 people in total have attended thevarious presentations, some 5,000 people per presentation —
clearly no small venture.
Had it not been for one particular event on a certain day some 2, 000 years ago, the bizarre and particularly brutal ancient Roman practice of crucifixion would have undoubtedly been forgotten. While perhaps millions died this way, it was the destruction of just one being upon the Cross that captured the attention of history. Although the crucifixion of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus The Christ, has been commemorated in countless illustrations and even film, Mel Gibson's monumental The Passion of the Christ brought home the reality of our Lord's last hours in a fashion unlike anything ever seen. Gibson's film was not only a gigantic box-office smash in the United States-despite determined efforts to stop the film from being distributed-but it also was a major sensation, received favorably in all Muslim nations where Christ is revered as a prophet. In addition, when the film was screened for Christian audiences in Malaysia and in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim republic, The Passion of the Christ received popular acclaim. ...