Les grands médias ne nous ont jamais dit que le présumé responsable des attaques à l'Anthrax aux USA après le 11 septembre, le scientifique Bruce Ivins, qui étudiait l'Anthrax, était un sioniste ultra et un anti-Islam virulent! The Frederick (Md.) News Post a publié des extraits de lettres d'Ivins, où il loue le refus d'un rabbin de dialoguer avec un religieux musulman. Ivins écrit: “By blood and faith, Jews are God’s chosen, and have no need for ‘dialogue’ with any gentile.”(Littéralement: "De par leur sang et leur foi, les Juifs sont élus de Dieu et n'ont aucun besoin de ''dialogue'' avec un quelconque Gentil (non-juif).") (Source: JTA - Ivins believed Jews were God's Chosen)
Les grands médias n'ont jamais mentionné l'existence d'un autre suspect, Philip Zack, accusé d'avoir monté une mise en scène visant à faire inculper un chercheur musulman. Zack était le supérieur d'Ivins et a même été filmé par une caméra de surveillance en train d'entrer dans le même laboratoire...
Ivins s'est apparemment suicidé or il n'est plus considéré comme suspect dans ces attaques, selon des documents officiels de la Justice américaine (Washington Post). Dans ce cas, qu'attend la Justice pour rouvrir l'enquête?
Investigators initially focused on the wrong man, then had to pay him a
nearly $6 million settlement. In 2008, they accused another man, Bruce
E. Ivins, who killed himself before he could go to trial.
Now, in the latest twist, the government has argued against itself.
In
documents deep in the files of a recently settled Florida lawsuit,
Justice Department civil attorneys contradicted their own department’s
conclusion that Ivins was unquestionably the anthrax killer. The lawyers
said the type of anthrax in Ivins’s lab was “radically different” from
the deadly anthrax. They cited several witnesses who said Ivins was
innocent, and they suggested that a private laboratory in Ohio could
have been involved in the attacks.
The
last week of July, all across America could be heard an almost audible
sigh of relief as headlines blared the news on the hour every hour that
‘he’ had finally been caught, the ‘he’ in this case being the infamous
bioterrorist (unknown and unnamed up to this point) who sent deadly
anthrax through the US mail system a mere week after the attacks of
9/11, leading to the deaths of 5.
What should have been heard
across America however was a disquieting ‘hmmmm,’ as Americans scratched
their heads and pondered the likelihood that the story being fed them
concerning the ‘suicide’ of Ft. Dietrich bioweapons lab scientist Bruce
E. Ivins was just another in a long string of lies, that it was not a
suicide at all, but rather just one more cog in a Zionist-organized
cover-up that has continued now for almost 7 years, beginning with 9/11.
There
are good reasons for Americans to be skeptical about the recent news
concerning the ‘suicide’ of bioweapons researcher Bruce Ivins
(undoubtedly destined to be dubbed ‘Dr. Anthrax’ now that he is not here
to defend his name) not the least of which is the timing of this event.
In the first case, the news of his death arrived only a month after the
US government was forced to pony up almost 6 million dollars to Steven
Hatfill, the bioweapons researcher whose good name and reputation were
destroyed as a result of the US Justice Department naming him a ‘person
of interest’ shortly after the attacks when the only ‘evidence’ linking
him to the infamous crimes came from a mouthy disinformation agent named
Barbra Rosenberg. Secondly, it is a mere month before the anniversary
of 9/11, and the fact that for the last 7 years the largest criminal
investigation in US history (codenamed ‘Amerithrax’ for maximum effect)
has turned up a big goose egg does not help things at a time when Uncle
Sam is suffering from a serious credibility problem, both at home and
abroad.
Those not recognizing the relevance of the aforementioned
case involving Hatfill should keep in mind that the US DoJ losing a
civil case against him (despite the scant news coverage it received) is
like the town crier announcing to all within earshot that the case
involving the anthrax attacks is not closed, and that the killer (or
killers) is still on the loose. Obviously, given that the FBI always
‘gets its man’ this is gravely embarrassing, to say the least.
But
more importantly, as any good cop will testify, a case not closed means
a case still open, which means going back to square one and reviewing
the evidence all over again in the hopes of finding something possibly
missed. Obviously this means looking at information certain entities
(and particularly those interested in dragging the US into Israel’s
dirty wars) can’t afford to have exposed to public scrutiny, and in
particular the evidence revolving around a certain Lt. Col. Phillip
Zack.
For those who bought into the made-in-Israel storyline
following the 2001 anthrax attacks that ‘the Ay-rabs did it,’ Zack was a
researcher at the same Ft. Dietrich bio-weapons lab where the now
‘suicided’ Bruce Ivins worked. Along with Zack and Ivins was also one
Ayyaad Assaad, an Egyptian-born scientist who became the butt of a
concerted anti-Arab, anti-Islamic campaign organized and executed by
Zack and some of his cohorts at the lab who collectively called
themselves ‘the Camel Club’. A few days after 9/11 an anonymous letter
turned up at a Marine base in Quantico Virginia accusing Assaad of being
a terrorist planning biological attacks against America. According to
Assaad’s testimony to the FBI agents who interviewed him, the personal
information contained in the letter could only have been written by a
co-worker at the lab, and surprise, surprise, a few days later, anthrax
turns up in the mail. Furthermore, a security film caught Zack entering
the Ft. Dietrich facility after hours at a time he no longer worked
there, and more importantly, caught him on tape entering a secure
section of the facility where the very same strain of anthrax used in
the attacks later turned up missing. Given that the anthrax attacks
amounted to the use of a weapon of mass destruction against the United
States, naturally investigative eyes were on all persons considered
relevant to the case, and–almost as if on cue–just about the time Zack
and his anti-Arab bigotry started to circulate as clues in the case, the
previously-mentioned Barbara Hatch Rosenberg floated the idea that
Steven Hatfill should be put under the microscope, which he was, while
all investigation of Zack slipped out the proverbial back door, never to
be mentioned again.
In sum, Hatfill being exonerated means all
bets are off and that more-likely culprits stand a good chance of being
reconsidered for their possible (or probable) roles in the anthrax
attacks following 9/11. More importantly though, it also means possible
public exposure of the fact that the anthrax attacks were part of a
carefully-coordinated false flag operation cooked up in the petri dish
called Mossad headquarters aimed at inflaming Americans into going to
war against Israel’s enemies, specifically Iraq.
And then, like a
bolt out of the blue comes the ‘suicide’ of one Bruce Ivins who worked
at the facility, and along with this a truck load of ‘evidence’ to
suggest he was the culprit. Court testimony from a social worker
claiming he was a dangerous psychopath planning on killing scores of
people given a mere week before his ‘suicide’, along with the supportive
testimony of psychiatrists who supposedly examined him.
Those
who think it really is an open and shut case of suicide on the part of a
guilty culprit should ask a few questions. If he really was ‘the guy’,
why was he allowed to keep his security clearance at the weapons lab
where he worked and (more importantly) where other infectious diseases
that could have been used in additional attacks on America were stored?
If he truly was about to be indicted for the anthrax attacks, why was he
not scooped up by the FBI immediately, lest he flee the country, or
worse, ‘go out in a blaze of glory’ as the previously-mentioned social
worker claimed he swore he would do? Was Ivins about to go public with
information he had concerning the real person (s) behind the attacks?
And more importantly, where is Lt. Col Phillip Zack, the anti-Arab bigot
filmed going into a secure area of Ft. Deitrich where the Ames strain
of anthrax used in the attack was stored, after hours, where few (if
any) witnesses could be found? Can rational persons assume he is sitting
on a beach somewhere in Israel, far away from this discussion and–more
importantly–from this investigation that the US DoJ is now saying will
be closed as early as this week?
To anyone who recognizes the
proclivity towards lying, frame-ups and cover-ups that exist on the part
of Israel’s friends in Washington DC, the case involving Ivins wreaks
of yet another in a long line of similar crimes. Just as Iraq was framed
for 9/11 when not a microbe of evidence existed tying the two together,
so too does it appear Bruce Ivins been framed for the anthrax attacks
in order to protect the identity of the real perpetrators, the emphasis
falling on the synonym of the second half of that word–‘traitors’.
Sadly–and
despite the fact that the present made-in-Israel wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan have cost them dearly–Americans will no doubt assume (as
planned) that the suicide of the bioweapons scientist indicates his
guilt. Just like Israel’s assassination of JFK (blamed on Lee Harvey
Oswald) to Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty (that both the Jewish
state and John McCain Sr ruled was an accident) to Israel’s role in
9/11, Americans will move on with their lives like dutiful little sheep,
not realizing that the death of Ivins, the war, and the rising cost of
fuel, food and just about every other necessary commodity are all
directly related to each other.
Meanwhile, in places like New
York, Tel Aviv and Washington DC, the persons responsible for all the
aforementioned planned chaos will get together, and amidst smiles,
snickers and handshakes and plot the next event designed to shyster
American parents into sending their beloved sons and daughters off to
fight and die for the Jewish state.
Censored Information Emerges About Scientist Accused of Anthrax Terrorism
Bruce Ivins,
"anthrax terrorist."
While
the controlled media was more than willing to expose every small detail
about the life of Bruce Ivins, the scientist who federal authorities
say killed himself several weeks ago, what they left out is perhaps even
more telling. Michael Collins Piper has uncovered some pertinent
information about the writings of Ivins that, he says, has been edited
out of every one of the thousands of mainstream news items published
about Ivins.
Although
we are not likely to ever know whether accused anthrax terrorist Bruce
Ivins really committed suicide, one particularly interesting aspect of
the case has been buried by the mass media in America.
Although
page after page of excruciatingly detailed information about Ivins’
personal life and career appeared in the major newspapers, the “big
secret” about Ivins has been blacked out: he was a virulent
Muslim-bashing supporter of Israel, a Christian by faith who trumpeted
the mantra that the Jews are “God’s Chosen People.” The Jewish Telegraph Agency
acknowledged candidly on August 4 that these facts about Ivins were, in
its words, “significant” because the notes accompanying the anthrax
sent to various locales were designed to appear as though they were
written by “a radical Islamist,” featuring such rhetoric as “Death to
America, Death to Israel, Allah is Great.”
The JTA article, which was published in Jewish community newspapers across America, revealed that the Frederick (Maryland) News Post
had recently republished several letters that Ivins had written to that
newspaper over the last several years, including one in which Ivins
praised a rabbi for refusing to engage in dialogue with a Muslim cleric.
Ivins wrote:
“By blood and faith, Jews are God’s chosen, and
have no need for ‘dialogue’ with any gentile.” (The term “gentile” is a
term of derision often openly used by Jews to refer to non-Jews,
essentially meaning that non-Jews are akin to insensate beasts.)
But
no major media in America took note of these revelations regarding
Ivins’ ideology. And it has hardly even been noted on the Internet. A
Google search of the Internet on August 17 of the terms “Ivins” and
“God’s chosen” indicated only 564 references. A similar search of
Google’s “news” section on the Internet indicated only four references
to this story—and none of those references were in the pages of The Washington Post,The Washington Times, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times or any other “mainstream” daily newspaper.
Clearly,
the masters of the media determined that American newspaper readers had
the right to know the most personal details of Ivins’ life, but chose
not to permit those readers to know of the pro-Israel ideological fervor
that drove Ivins to mask his murderous attacks as the work of Muslim
terrorists.
After all, this might cause Americans to raise
questions as to whether other acts of terrorism—ascribed to “Muslim
terrorists”—were really the work of Muslims at all, but instead “false
flag” measures by Israel and its adherents to turn Americans against the
Muslim world.
And if Ivins was involved in the mailing of anthrax-laden letters after 9-11, was he acting alone or at the behest of others?
Both
Mark Glenn and Victor Thorn have written authoritative articles for AFP
regarding the Ivins case. Among other things, they noted data
suggesting Ivins was murdered and and evidence pointing toward
involvement in the anthrax affair by yet another pro-Israel scientist,
Philip Zack. Zack is accused of trying to frame a Muslim colleague for
the crime.
So the entirety of the scenario remains a mystery.
What we do know is that the controlled media is not telling us
everything we need to know.
Philip Zack Steals Anthrax It's been five years since anthrax killed innocents and fueled America's paranoia. But the FBI keeps dragging its feet on the case. (2006)
(...) According to interviews with Assaad and this scientist, along with additional Army investigative transcripts obtained by Salon, the Army’s biowarfare research lab in the early 1990s was an organizational disaster area. A big problem at the lab, which apparently contributed to specimens going missing, was that after the Gulf War, USAMRIID decided to phase out work some scientists had been doing on projects that the Army lab no longer considered crucial to their core mission of researching vaccines against bioweapons. Many scientists who had been engaged in other projects, such as Lt. Col. Phil Zack, who had been researching the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), were eager to continue working on projects USAMRIID said they should stop. What followed, the documents reveal, were scientists sneaking into the Army biowarfare lab to work on pet projects after-hours and on weekends, former workers like Zack, who left in 1991, still being let in to do lab work, pressure applied to technicians to help out, documents going missing, and deliberate mislabeling of specimens among other efforts to hide unsanctioned lab work.
Lt. Col. Michael Langford, an Army scientist who became head of the USAMRIID experimental pathology division in February 1992, was interviewed by a USAMRIID investigator in the spring of 1992. The transcripts of that and other interviews reveal shocking lapses of security and resistance to oversight by USAMRIID lab scientists, including some of the same ones who engaged in harassment of Assaad.
“At the time I took over the Experimental Pathology branch on the 3rd of February [1992] it was obvious to me that there was little or no organization of that group and little or no accountability of many things,” Langford told the Army investigator, Col. Thomas J. Taylor.
Langford describes walking in to work one morning and seeing a group of lab scientists and technicians huddled behind closed doors in the room that houses an electron microscope. What Langford concluded was that certain scientists were covertly working on projects at night and on weekends that had been ordered halted by their division chief. He further concluded that employees were desperately trying to find old specimens of biological agents, including anthrax, they could “re-label” to cover up specimens that had gone missing in the chaos of prohibited, after-hours lab work.
“I walked in and the lights were on, the scope was off, and they were intensely looking for these blocks [of anthrax],” Langford described. “What was indicated to me was that perhaps these specimens were bootleg so to speak, they were going to cover them with old specimens, and when the old specimens disappeared, they were going to take these old anthrax blocks and substitute them. Well, when those were unavailable then these new blocks [of anthrax] mysteriously disappeared. So of course the probability is high that there was a problem there.”
Langford also described to the investigator strong resistance from his underlings and other scientists to his efforts to manage the group. Among those Langford considered management problems were Marian Rippy, a researcher in the experimental pathology division. (Zack and Rippy had also been reprimanded by the Army for harassing Assaad.) Langford said he considered a number of those on his staff to be “extremely difficult to deal with, would volunteer almost nothing, nearly almost always had to be given a written request to get a response, were very defiant, were very obstructive, and I also heard rumors that … Marian [Rippy] had made comments to the people in that lab basically to undermine me, you know, when I was coming in there,” according to Langford.
“We were not to continue any work; in fact I was aware that [Pathology division commander Lt. Col. Nancy Jaax] had secured the SIV materials and people because again it appeared from many sources that Phil Zack was asking people to work basically covertly and continue his SIV work against obvious clear mandates and directives of the division chief,” Langford told the investigator. (In an interesting side note, Jaax, whom Langford refers to, is the protagonist of the Richard Preston book “The Hot Zone,” about an Ebola outbreak in lab monkeys in Reston, Va., in 1989. The real-life events were also the basis of the movie “Outbreak,” starring Dustin Hoffman.)
It was during this period, from 1990 to early 1992, when scientists apparently pursued projects covertly at the lab, that the Army facility appears to have lost track of 27 specimens, including anthrax, Ebola and hantavirus. USAMRIID told media this week that any specimens that went missing were rendered harmless by various preservation and radiation processes — a contention Assaad says is not true. He says the specimens leave behind a residue that could be reactivated.
Assaad’s personal experience at that lab makes him particularly skeptical. He complains of behavior from colleagues that, while certainly not necessarily that of potential terrorists, does seem like symptoms of a poorly managed lab that was out of control.
In particular, Assaad, who is Egyptian-American, was the target of the group of USAMRIID scientists and lab technicians who called themselves the Camel Club. Among his antagonists were colleagues in Fort Detrick lab’s experimental pathology division, Zack and Rippy.
Using a stuffed camel as a kind of mascot, the Camel Club composed a poem, “The Rhyme of the Ancient Camellier,” with the apparent purpose of humiliating Assaad. It begins:
“Ayaad Assaad was the start,
with a reputation for not having heart
A ‘skimmer’ without equal
We hope there’s no sequel
In his honor we created this beast
It represents life lower than yeast
Whoever is voted this sucker,
you can’t duck her, You must accept blame,
And bear all the shame Unlike Assaad,
that first motherfucker”
The poem continues for five typewritten rhyming pages, ending with:
Well it’s time for the camel to pass.
So let’s all reach and raise up a glass.
Let’s give’m the credit,
the one who will get it,
the poor bastard we’re gonna harass.
Assaad theorizes that the Camel Club and the racial discrimination he experienced were at least partly an outgrowth of a dispute he had with Zack and Rippy over the authorship of a scientific paper for which he says he had done the research. Rippy and Zack, Assaad says, had done only minor work, but wanted to put their names on the research paper, and he says he felt they didn’t deserve it. Assaad says the dispute escalated, with Rippy and Zack threatening to be disruptive and humiliate him at a scientific conference where he delivered his paper’s findings. Then, he says, their harassment took an ethnic cast, because of his Arabic heritage.
Assaad said he filed a formal complaint with the Army after his supervisor ignored him. The commander of the U.S. Army lab investigated the complaint and found in Assaad’s favor, and singled out Zack and Rippy for criticism for being at the center of the Camel Club. (The Army investigation documents further revealed that the two, both married, were also having an affair.)
“Based upon your complaint, I directed that an informal investigation be conducted,” USAMRIID’s then-commander, Col. Ronald Williams, wrote Assaad in a memo in August 1992. “The investigation revealed that Lieutenant Colonel Zack and Dr. Rippy had participated in discriminatory behavior.
“On behalf of the United States of America, the Army, and this Institute, I wish to genuinely and humbly apologize for this behavior,” Williams’ memo continued.
Before the investigation ended, both Zack and Rippy were reprimanded. Then Zack left USAMRIID in December 1991, first heading to the Army’s Walter Reed Institute, then going to the private pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly, and then to a company in Colorado acquired by St. Louis’ Nexstar Financial Management. Several calls by Salon to his last known phone number and address in Boulder, Colo., went unreturned, and Nexstar says it no longer has any record of Zack. Rippy, who left USAMRIID shortly after Zack, in February 1992, worked for a while at Eli Lilly, but could not be located by Salon.
Assaad is puzzled that after clearing him of the accusation that he could be a bioterrorist, the FBI showed no interest in talking with him about his days at Fort Detrick. “The whole world wants to talk to me, except the FBI,” he said, as his lawyer’s phones rang nonstop this week, with media organizations seeking interviews with him. “Something’s wrong here.”
But while the FBI may not be interested in talking with Assaad further, federal authorities increasingly seem to believe that the anthrax letters were sent by a U.S. government scientist — and not by the Iraqis or al-Qaida, as some hawks have continued to insist over the past few months, while hundreds of Islamic and Arab-born immigrants have been questioned and detained by the FBI and INS.
“I can tell you there are scientists out there who do have military connections that we are focusing on, at least that connection,” Kevin Donovan, FBI special agent in charge of the Newark bureau, said at a press conference Wednesday.
For his part, Assaad says, “I want people to know the truth,” and wants to show the American people that Arab-Americans are not the enemy. Should the FBI trace the anthrax attacks back to his former lab, Assaad may have gone a long way toward his goal.
Laura Rozen writes about U.S. foreign policy and the Balkans crisis for Salon News.
(..)Documents from the inquiry show that one unauthorized person who was observed entering the lab building at night was Langford's predecessor, Lt. Col. Philip Zack, who at the time no longer worked at Fort Detrick. A surveillance camera recorded Zack being let in at 8:40 p.m. on Jan. 23, 1992, apparently by Dr. Marian Rippy, a lab pathologist and close friend of Zack's, according to a report filed by a security guard.
Zack could not be reached for comment. In an interview this week, Rippy said that she doesn't remember letting Zack in, but that he occasionally stopped by after he was transferred off the base.
"After he left, he had no [authorized] access to the building. Other people let him in," she said. "He knew a lot of people there and he was still part of the military. I can tell you, there was no suspicious stuff going on there with specimens."
Zack left Fort Detrick in December 1991, after a controversy over allegations of unprofessional behavior by Zack, Rippy, Brown and others who worked in the pathology division. They had formed a clique that was accused of harassing the Egyptian-born Assaad, who later sued the Army, claiming discrimination.
Assaad said he had believed the harassment was behind him until last October, until after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
He said that is when the FBI contacted him, saying someone had mailed an anonymous letter - a few days before the existence of anthrax-laced mail became known - naming Assaad as a potential bioterrorist. FBI agents decided the note was a hoax after interviewing Assaad.
But Assaad said he believes the note's timing makes the author a suspect in the anthrax attacks, and he is convinced that details of his work contained in the letter mean the author must be a former Fort Detrick colleague.
Brown said that he doesn't know who sent the letter, but that Assaad's nationality and expertise in biological agents made him an obvious subject of concern after Sept. 11.
“The
anthrax attacks, coming on the heels of Sept. 11, had enduring effects.
They deepened fears of terrorism and helped advocates of a U.S.
invasion of Iraq make their case to Congress and the public. They
prompted an expensive and risky expansion of federally funded biodefense
laboratories.” (LA Times)
“It
is hard to overstate the political significance of the anthrax attacks.
For reasons I’ve described at length, that event played at least as
much of a role as the 9/11 attacks in elevating the Terrorism fear
levels which, through today, sustain endless wars, massive defense and
homeland security budgets, and relentless civil liberties erosions. … in
essence, it was anthrax that convinced large numbers of Americans that
Terrorism was something that could show up without warning at their
doorstep — though something as innocuous as their mailbox — in the form
of James-Bond-like attacks featuring invisible, lethal powder.
Moreover, anthrax was exploited in the aftermath of 9/11 to ratchet up
the fear levels toward Saddam Hussein, as ABC News‘ Brian Ross spent a
full week screeching to the country — falsely – that bentonite had been
found in the anthrax and that this agent was the telltale sign of Iraq’s
chemical weapons program, while George Bush throughout 2002 routinely
featured “anthrax” as one of Saddam’s scary weapons.”
Matthews: Why were the people in the administration like [Paul] Wolfowitz and the others talking about going into Iraq from the very beginning, when they got into the White Wouse long before there was a 9-11, long before they start talking about WMDs. (...) It seemed like there was a deeper reason. I don’t get it. It seemed like the WMDs was a cover story. Corn: I can explain that. For years, Paul Wolfowitz and other members of the neocon movement had talked about getting rid of Iraq and that there would be democracy throughout the region, that it would help Israel and they came to believe actually a very bizarre conspiracy theory that al Qaeda didn’t matter, that actually Saddam Hussein was behind all the acts of violence, the 1993 WTC Bombings, the Bombing of the USS Cole in 1999, and they came into the White House with that perspective, so when people like Richard Clark, the Counter-terrorism advisor, said "listen, we've got to do something with al Qaeda", Wolfowitz said "Bin Laden doesn't matter". They want it all focussed on Iraq. Up until 9-11, and they saw that as their opportunity to then pounce, even though Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11. Matthews: The reason I go back to that is there’s a consistent pattern: the people who wanted that war in the worst ways, neocons so called, Wolfowitz, certainly Cheney.. it’s the same crowd of people that want us to overthrow Bashar Assad, .. it’s the same group of people that don’t want to negotiate at all with the Iranians, don’t want any kind of rapprochement with the Iranians, they want to fight that war. They’re willing to go in there and bomb. They have a consistent impulsive desire to make war on Arab and Islamic states in a neverending campaign, almost like an Orwellian campaign they will never outlive, that’s why I have a problem with that thinking. (…) we’ve got to get to the bottom of it. Why did they take us to Iraq, because that’s the same reason they want to take us into Damascus and why they want to have permanent war with Iran.
The U.S. is at last facing the neocon captivity (Mondoweiss) The best thing about this political moment in the U.S. (if not for the good people of Iraq) is that the rise of ISIS and the Republican candidates’ embrace of the Iraq war is posing that deep and permanent question to the American public, Why did we invade Iraq? Last night Chris Matthews asked that question again and David Corn said it was about the neoconservative desire to protect Israel. Both men deserve kudos for courage.
The Jeb Bush Adviser Who Should Scare You Paul Wolfowitz not only championed the Iraq War—he obsessively promoted a bizarre conspiracy theory.
—By David Corn | Wed May 13, 2015 6:05 AM EDT
Last week, Jeb Bush, the all-but-announced GOP presidential candidate, stirred up a fuss when he privately told a group of Manhattan financiers that his top adviser on US-Israeli policy is George W. Bush. Given that Jeb has tried mightily to distance himself from his brother, whose administration used false assertions to launch the still highly unpopular Iraq War, this touting of W.—even at a behind-closed-doors session of Republican donors—seemed odd. But perhaps more noteworthy is that Jeb Bush has embraced much of his brother's White House foreign policy team. In February, his campaign released a list of 21 foreign policy advisers; 17 of them served in the George W. Bush administration. And one name stood out: Paul Wolfowitz, a top policy architect of the Iraq War—for the prospect of Wolfowitz whispering into Jeb's ear ought to scare the bejeezus out of anyone who yearns for a rational national security policy.
Wolfowitz, who was deputy defense secretary under George W. Bush, was a prominent neocon cheerleader for the invasion of Iraq. He was also the top conspiracy theorist in the Bush-Cheney crowd. As Michael Isikoff and I reported in our our 2006 book, Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War,
Wolfowitz, prior to the Iraq War, was a champion of a bizarre theory promoted by an eccentric academic named Laurie Mylroie: Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, not Islamic extremists such as Al Qaeda, was responsible for most of the world's anti-United States terrorism.
For years, Mylroie, who had been an assistant professor of political science at Harvard University, had promoted the notion that Saddam was the real terrorist threat to the United States, and law enforcement and intelligence officials had dismissed her thesis, which was based on assorted elaborate conspiracies that apparently only she could divine. After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, she developed a complicated hypothesis that the mastermind of that attack, an Islamic radical who went by the name of Ramzi Yousef and who had spent time in Afghan training camps affiliated with Al Qaeda, was actually an Iraqi intelligence agent who had somehow stolen Yousef's identity. Actually, according to Mylroie the Iraqi agent had stolen the identity of a deceased Pakistani and then taken on the name Ramzi Yousef. In any event, this would mean that Saddam, not Islamic extremists, was behind this act of war.
Mylroie made the rounds of the then-small world of counterterrorism studies. FBI investigators, federal prosecutors, and the CIA considered her theory and tossed it aside. She had no compelling evidence. (One CIA analyst noted, "Not only was it not true, we proved the opposite"—that Saddam was not connected to the 1993 bombing.) But Mylroie pressed on, and neocons, who had long been diehard supporters of Israel who yearned to drum up support for US military action against Iraq, flocked to her ideas.
Wolfowitz was one of her fiercest advocates. At one point during the Clinton years, when Wolfowitz was serving as the dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, he met with Martin Indyk, who was overseeing Iraq policy for the National Security Council, and asked why the Clinton administration had not accepted Mylroie's view. Indyk told him that the CIA and FBI had settled this issue. But Wolfowitz was not persuaded. "He was convinced that we were purposely refusing to see the link for policy reasons," Indyk told Isikoff and me for our book.
Mylroie continued to peddle her conspiracy idea. After the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, she insisted that Iraq was also behind this event. She sent memos to the lawyers for Timothy McVeigh, who was eventually convicted of mounting this attack, claiming that McVeigh's co-conspirator, Terry Nichols, had been in league with Ramzi Yousef, the supposed Iraqi agent. As for Al Qaeda's bombings of two US embassies in Africa in 1998 and its 2000 bombing of the USS Cole off the Yemen coast, Mylroie contended that these attacks were actually the handiwork of Saddam. "Everything, everything, everything was connected to Saddam," Daniel Pipes, a former Mylroie collaborator, said. "She became monomaniacal on the subject." At the core of this was a fundamental and important policy implication: the US government needed to worry more about Saddam than radical Islamic fundamentalists.
In 2000, Mylroie published a book on the 1993 World Trade Center bombing called Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America.
Wolfowitz had helped her with the manuscript, and in the acknowledgements Mylroie noted that his wife, Clare, had "fundamentally shaped this book." The book featured a blurb from him:
Laurie Mylroie's provocative and disturbing book argues powerfully that the shadowy mastermind of the 1993 bombing of New York's World Trade Center, Ramzi Yousef, was in fact an agent of Iraqi intelligence.
If so, what would that tell us about the extent of Saddam Hussein's ambitions? How would it change our view of Iraq's continuing efforts to retrain weapons of mass destruction and to acquire new ones? How would it affect our judgments...and the need for a fundamentally new policy? These are questions that urgently need to be answered.
This was quite an endorsement. Wolfowitz, who had been a top Pentagon official for the first President Bush, was a leading member of the Republican defense establishment, and he was giving his seal of approval to what was essentially the Da Vinci Code of terrorism. Other leading neocons praised her work, including former CIA director R. James Woolsey and ex-Pentagon official Richard Perle.
After George W. Bush entered the White House, Wolfowitz, now the No. 2 official in the Defense Department, pushed Mylroie's theory. At one point before Sept. 11, 2001, he asked the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency to have his analysts review her book. (The analysts did and found nothing to confirm her suppositions.) Wolfowitz also pressed the CIA to reassess its negative evaluation of Mylroie's theory. Officials who worked with Wolfowitz later noted that he could cite specific pages from Mylroie's book. To some, he seemed practically obsessed with it.
This had serious consequences. In an April 2001 interagency meeting on terrorism, Richard Clarke, the White House counterterrorism adviser, noted that a US priority ought to be targeting Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda leaders in Afghanistan. Yet Wolfowitz, Clarke recounted in his memoir, pooh-poohed this concern with "one man, bin Laden" and said the government should focus on "Iraqi terrorism."
Not surprisingly, days after 9/11, Mylroie was publicly suggesting that that it was "extremely unlikely" and "next to impossible" that bin Laden had pulled off this assault "unassisted by a state." She meant Iraq. And her views influenced the Bush-Cheney administration's immediate reaction to 9/11. The day after the attack, Bush asked Clarke to search for evidence that Saddam was behind the attack. At a Cabinet meeting on Sept. 15, Wolfowitz contended there was a 10 to 50 percent chance that Saddam had helped orchestrate the 9/11 plot, and he proposed attacking Iraq, observing that a war there might be easier than one in Afghanistan. In subsequent memos, Wolfowitz pushed the same point. He also dispatched Woolsey to London to find evidence to prove Mylroie's theory. (He came back empty-handed.)
Ultimately, Bush did not take Wolfowitz's advice to start with a war on Iraq. He attacked Afghanistan. But as soon as the Taliban regime in Kabul fell, Bush asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to draw up war plans for Iraq. And Wolfowitz never ceased promoting Mylroie's Saddam-did-it theory. During a March 17, 2002, lunch with the British ambassador, Wolfowitz insisted that Saddam was tied to the first World Trade Center attack. Meanwhile, Mylroie became a television pundit, claiming that the CIA was covering up the Saddam connection to 9/11.
Throughout this period, Wolfowitz was also promoting a similar theory within the administration: that lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta had met in Prague with an Iraqi intelligence official. CIA and FBI officials had concluded that this, too, did not occur. (After the Iraq invasion, Wolfowitz would order WMD hunters in Iraq to search for evidence of the Atta meeting in Prague; nothing would be found.) And at the Pentagon, Wolfowitz oversaw an effort managed by Doug Feith, the undersecretary of defense for policy, to cherry-pick intelligence to link Iraq to 9/11.
(This attempt yielded no proof.) Wolfowitz also was a prime advocate for Ahmed Chalabi, the Iraqi exile leader whose Iraqi National Congress before the war was peddling bad information on Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction.
Wolfowitz's record in office is littered with profound errors. After General Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff, testified before Congress weeks prior to the invasion of Iraq that it would take "several hundred thousand soldiers" to occupy Iraq, Wolfowitz said this estimate was "wildly off the mark." He discounted the possibility of sectarian violence in Iraq following the invasion, insisted that Iraq's oil revenues would finance post-war reconstruction, and declared that he was "reasonably certain that they will greet us as liberators." None of these claims were based on serious Pentagon, State Department, or CIA assessments. And none turned out to be true.
Wolfowitz and all his senior-level colleagues in the Bush-Cheney administration got Iraq wrong. They each were guilty of wishful thinking and arrogantly believed they knew better than area experts in various government agencies. But within this crew, as a ferocious advocate of a wacky and paranoid conspiracy theory, Wolfowitz went further in denying reality. And for that, his judgment ought to be questioned. After all, his passionate embrace of Mylroie's unproven and screwy thesis caused him to miscalculate one of the most serious threats to the United States. He could have been run out of the public sphere for this. Yet Wolfowitz was awarded the Medal of Freedom by George W. Bush and named president of the World Bank (where he went on to have a scandalous tenure).
And now Wolfowitz is advising yet another Bush who may end up in the White House. One can only imagine what dark global conspiracies he's pitching these days.
David Brooks’ sickening Iraq apologia: How the New York Times hack just rewrote history The conservative New York Times columnist explains what he's learned from his Iraq war boosting: largely nothing New York Times columnist David Brooks was once an enthusiastic backer of George W. Bush’s disastrous invasion of Iraq. He’d write columns for the Weekly Standard – the official journal of bankrupt neoconservative thought – glorifying Bush for his steely-eyed determination and tartly mocking the pansy liberals and other anti-war types who opposed Bush’s righteous exercise in nation-building and freedom-spreading.
2016 Republicans: Ron Paul was right all along about the Iraq War On stage that night in 2007 when Ron Paul was laughed at, stood 2008 Republican nominee John McCain, an early supporter of the Iraq War and unrepentant hawk. Also present was 2012 nominee Mitt Romney, who said, “It was the right decision to go into Iraq.” To get rid of this baggage, or begin to get rid of it, there would have to be a dramatic break or some visible shift within the GOP.
Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, in his 2003 interview with Sam Tanenhaus in Vanity Fair just weeks after the U.S. invasion, succinctly set forth the administration's rationale for war against Saddam: "There have always been three fundamental concerns. One is weapons of mass destruction, the second is support for terrorism, the third is the criminal treatment of the Iraqi people. Actually I guess you could say there's a fourth overriding one which is the connection between the first two..." The subsequent 911 Commission Report documented the administration's extensive focus on Saddam Hussein in the wake of the 9/11 attack, including the determination to use the attack as a pretext to bring down the Iraqi dictator. Immediately after the publication of the Wolfowitz interview, the Pentagon and Conservative commentators objected to emphasis in the Vanity Fair article that the administration had settled on WMD as the sole or primary rationale for the invasion. A Pentagon official asserted, correctly, that in the Vanity Fair interview Wolfowitz "made clear that there were multiple reasons for the use of military forces against Iraq." Writing a few weeks later, Bill Kristol, conservative doyen and editor of The Weekly Standard, disputed the notion that the war had been sold to the American public on false pretenses, explicitly focusing on the conflation of chemical and nuclear weapons under the single acronym WMD. "No one doubts that Saddam's regime had weapons of mass destruction, used weapons of mass destruction, and had an ongoing program to develop more such weapons."
Jeb Bush Bobs and Weaves the Iraq War A little over a week ago, Fox News aired an exclusive interview with Jeb Bush. It has caused a stir. Jeb has yet to announce officially that he is running for President, even though it is perfectly obvious that he is running whole hog for President. Didn’t he take part in the Sheldon Adelson Primary, after all? What could be more grotesquely Presidential than that? Welcome to the horror show known as the 2016 U.S. election cycle.
Give War a Chance
J.J. Goldberg digs deeper into the conflicting roles that Benjamin
Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon played in George W. Bush’s disastrous war in
Iraq — and what it means for Iran today.
On Monday, Jeb Bush posted a column on Medium touting the need for
ramped-up cybersecurity efforts. "Given the reliance of the United
States government and the private sector on the internet, it is
disturbing we remain vulnerable to its disruption and misuse," he wrote.
The piece was mostly devoid of specific ways to fix those
vulnerabilities, but what Bush did propose raises some privacy concerns.
The former Florida governor cited Estonia, a tiny Baltic nation that's a
world leader in cybersecurity efforts, as a model to emulate.
C'est là-bas que Bollyn et sa famille sont planqués, et ils ont même pas à se cacher...
FLASHBACK: The world was right about Iraq– though Israel got its ‘Clean Break’, June 14, 2014 Enter the Bush Doctrine
The four pillars of the president's strategy for winning World War IV.
By [ULTRA-ZIONIST NEOCON JEW] Norman Podhoretz Updated Sept. 2, 2004
(Editor's note: This is excerpted from Mr. Podhoretz's article, "World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win," which appears in the September issue of Commentary.) Voir la version française (et résumée) de Réseau Voltaire.
Podhoretz sur les Troisième et Quatrième guerres mondiales: "For
these reasons, I agree with one of our leading contemporary students of
military strategy, Eliot A. Cohen, who thinks that what is generally
called the "Cold War" (a term, incidentally, coined by Soviet
propagandists) should be given a new name. "The Cold War," Mr. Cohen
writes, was actually "World War III, which reminds us that not all
global conflicts entail the movement of multimillion-man armies, or
conventional front lines on a map." I also agree that the nature of the
conflict in which we are now engaged can only be fully appreciated if we
look upon it as World War IV. To justify giving it this name--rather
than, say, the "war on terrorism"--Mr. Cohen lists "some key features"
that it shares with World War III: that it is, in fact, global; that it
will involve a mixture of violent and nonviolent efforts; that it will
require mobilization of skill, expertise and resources, if not of vast
numbers of soldiers; that it may go on for a long time; and that it has
ideological roots. There is one more feature that World War IV shares
with World War III and that Mr. Cohen does not mention: Both were
declared through the enunciation of a presidential doctrine." Exclusive: Jeb Bush Linked to Cartel Money Laundering While Serving CIA Jeb Bush Taking Advice From Iraq War Architect Paul Wolfowitz Jeb Bush leaves door open for use of torture Republican candidate declines to give ‘definitive, blanket’ rejection of practice as a counterterror measure
(..)In his 20 minute appeal, Obama repeatedly weaved two themes known to strike a chord among progressives: the Iraq war, and the role of big money in Washington’s decision making process. When put together it sounded something like this: Criticism of the deal, he said, comes “partly from the $20 million that’s being spent lobbying against the bill,” and “partly from the same columnists and former administration officials that were responsible for us getting into the Iraq war.“ The wording, though chosen carefully as not to conflate the two groups, treaded into a highly sensitive area for some in the Jewish community. The mention of $20 million is a clear reference to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which is leading the lobbying efforts against the Iran deal and has raised, through a sister organization, this sum in order to fight for disapproving the agreement. Tying AIPAC and those who pushed for military intervention in Iraq in the same argument, could be read as accepting the notion that the American Jewish community was behind the Iraq war. It is a notion the organized pro-Israel community has been trying to fight off for over a decade. The idea that Jews laid the groundwork for the Iraq war stems, in part, from the fact that several national security and defense advisers in the Bush administration were Jewish neo-conservatives who supported the war. The organized Jewish community, however, did not call on the Bush administration to launch a military offensive against Iraq. The reference was not lost on Jewish officials who are attuned to this sensitivity. “Canard,” tweeted William Daroff of the Jewish Federations of North America as Obama spoke on the conference call. And while Obama may have had no intention of giving credence to it, the pronounced equation he made between those supporting the Iraq war and those opposing the Iran deal, is likely to make many in the community feel uneasy. As is the reference to “billionaires” bankrolling the political effort to defeat the agreement in Congress. “You’ve got a whole bunch of folks who are big check writers to political campaigns, running TV ads, and billionaires who happily finance SuperPACs and they are putting the squeeze on members of Congress,” Obama said. Again, Obama made no direct reference to any individual involved in funding the drive against the Iran deal, but it is clear that most of the money raised by pro-Israel groups for this campaign has come from Jewish donors. And the Republican Jewish Coalition was quick to issue a statement condemning Obama for “demonizing” opponents of the deal and reminding Jewish leaders that when George H. W. Bush complained in 1991 about the power of lobbyists, he was criticized by Jewish groups for what was seen as a negative reference to the political power of Jewish Americans. (...)
Tant sur la "question iranienne" que sur la "question palestinienne" et la "question irakienne", le parti républicain états-unien suit rigoureusement la même ligne que le gouvernement israélien.
Kerry: There is a lot of hysteria over Iran deal U.S. Secretary of State tells Channel 10 that Washington would never let Israel down; Netanyahu, meanwhile, says Lausanne nuclear deal makes world a more dangerous place.
Meet Marco Rubio's Owner As Marco Rubio has ascended in the ranks of Republican politics, an auto dealer named Norman Braman has emerged as a remarkable and unusual patron.
Morbid Marco Rubio Asks America, ‘Is It Safe?’ The interesting thing about Marco Rubio’s emerging foreign-policy profile is not his commitment to mindlessly bellicose neoconservatism. (This remains Republican doctrine, and Rubio has a keen eye for locating the most popular stance within his party.) Rather, the interesting thing is that Rubio sees no need to hide his bellicosity behind feigned sophistication. He is a loud and proud neanderthal, appealing to the most primitive, fearful elements of the conservative brain, or brain-stem.
Les USA, Israël et l'Iran
Depuis quelque temps, les médias occidentaux se font l’écho du
différent entre les USA et Israël concernant l’attitude à adopter envers
l’Iran.
Democrats losing Jewish vote
Op-ed: Weakening alliance between US Jewry and Democrats due to Obama's
Israel policy could have effect on identity of next president.
ISRAELI JEWS: “THE WHOLE WORLD IS AGAINST US” Everybody Hates the Jews!
A poll found that 71% of Israelis think that the world has a double
standard when it comes to criticizing Israel. Do most Israelis think
that the whole world is against us? If so, how does that belief affect
our politics?
VIDEO - NBC profiles Sheldon Adelson in its series 'Meet the Money' Adelson is so powerful he has his own season in American politics known as the Adelson primary, where Republican presidential hopefuls make 'the pilgrimage to Las Vegas to vie for the blessing of his Republican-Jewish coalition.'
WATCH: Graham tells Goldberg, Iranian regime are 'religious Nazis'
Republican presidential candidate Lindsey Graham, in an explosive
interview with Jeffery Goldberg at the 2015 Aspen Ideas Festival,
accused Obama of 'sitting down and talking with people [Iran] who are
nuts as if they were not nuts.'
Trump's real mistake? Not running in Israel.
And we've got just the party for him If only he would consider running
with Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud. He would be perfect. He'd fit right in.
It's not just the comb-over and the billions. It's the racism.
We thank you for your historic and moral vote to divest from the
Israeli occupation. Your vote is a profound act of solidarity with
Palestinians who have suffered decades of occupation, dispossession, and
discrimination.
State Department backs away from anti-BDS law’s language
Legislation’s ‘conflation’ of Israel, Israeli-controlled territories
‘runs counter to longstanding US policy,’ says spokesman, indicating
measure will not apply to settlements
Michael Oren's contempt for U.S. Jews
Far from the genuine respect you would expect from a former Israeli
ambassador, Oren seems to view America's Jews as unreliable and quick to
criticize the Jewish state.
Ya'alon: There is no humanitarian distress in Gaza Ya'alon's words, coming a year after Operation Protective Edge, when according to United Nations figures
almost 1,500 Palestinian civilians were killed, including 500 children,
and hundreds of thousands lost their homes, contradict a series of
international reports on the situation in Gaza. For example, a report
published by the World Bank a month ago presented a harsh picture of the economic situation in Gaza and asserted that unemployment in the Strip is the highest in the world.
Netanyahu sends implicit threat to Iran ahead of nuclear deadline
'Israel will always defend itself, and its air force will play a major
role,' prime minister says in comments at pilots' graduation ceremony. Bibi Says Iran Nuclear Deal Getting Even Worse Netanyahu Warns: West Conceding Too Much to Iran Prime Minister issues last-minute warning to the West as deadline to nuclear talks looms in less than a week. Obama's Congress trick
Analysis: Those relying on Iran deal being thwarted by US Congress are
in for a disappointment, unless final agreement is much worse than draft
proposed in Lausanne – and in such a case, American president himself
may be unwilling to approve it.
Ils sont stressés à mort parce que l'accord avec l'Iran va passer si le Congrès est incapable de le bloquer.
No freedom of expression for Israeli anthropologists?
Op-ed: Is it illegitimate for Israeli academics to believe that Gaza's
problems stem from Hamas' jihadist ideology? Should they be threatened
with a boycott if they fail to adopt 'the right stance'?
Israeli settlements profit from Palestinian children
Palestinian children are working under exploitative conditions on
Israeli settlements, ensuring handsome profits for the settlers. As Mel
Frykberg reports from the West Bank, the children are too afraid to
speak out.
On Monday, Jeb Bush posted a column on Medium touting the need for
ramped-up cybersecurity efforts. "Given the reliance of the United
States government and the private sector on the internet, it is
disturbing we remain vulnerable to its disruption and misuse," he wrote.
The piece was mostly devoid of specific ways to fix those
vulnerabilities, but what Bush did propose raises some privacy concerns.
The former Florida governor cited Estonia, a tiny Baltic nation that's a
world leader in cybersecurity efforts, as a model to emulate.
C'est là-bas que Bollyn et sa famille sont planqués, et ils ont même pas à se cacher...
MORE ZIOLIES TO HIDE THE TRUTH ABOUT BDS
New York Councilor Petitions to Ban Roger Waters from US. Long Island
councilman Bruce Blakeman says notorious anti-Israel musician’s actions
would be a hate crime in the US.
The chilling film about Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's killer goes beyond the fear If
you hoped to find out why a married mother of four fell in love with
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's assassin, the film 'Beyond the Fear' will
not leave you any wiser. But the controversial documentary about Amir,
his wife and son, has other lessons.
Obama disliked in Israeli polls
Despite attempts at reconciliation after conclusion of Iran deal, US
president still struggles to find favor with Israelis more than any
other country.
Dick Cheney : L’accord sur le nucléaire iranien est une "folie"
Les nazis ont mis 7 ans pour tuer 6 millions de Juifs, mais il faudra
seulement « un jour » à un Iran nucléaire pour parvenir au même
résultat, a déclaré l’ancien vice-président de George W Bush.
‘Nuke the Iran deal,’ Boston rally tells US Congress
Making frequent references to the Holocaust, up to 1,000 Bostonians
gather on Beacon Hill to protest the Obama administration’s ‘disgraceful
and dangerous’ nuclear accord.
ISRAEL ON THE EDGE OF THE ABYSS – MUST READ
YNET – Analysis: Israel is willing to do anything to thwart the nuclear
deal, including publicly threatening Iranian scientists, interfering
with the internal affairs of the US, and dividing US Jews; meanwhile,
Netanyahu’s mistaken 2002 assessment of Iraq is coming back to haunt him
in his battle against Tehran.
US Jews must stay true to 'never again' pledge
Op-ed: American Jews, who are overwhelmingly Democrats, will have to
choose the Jewish state’s survival and security over the legacy of and
loyalty to a lame duck president from the party they support.
US Should Bring Israel Down a Peg – Buchanan
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pushes things too far with
his audacious attempts to rip up Barack Obama’s Iran Nuclear deal, says
political commentator and author Patrick J. Buchanan.
Anti-Iran lobby chief backs Iran accord, steps down
Former US senator Joe Lieberman has been named chairman of “United
Against Nuclear Iran,” as the lobbying group’s president steps down
because he supports the nuclear agreement with Iran.
And Poof! Charles Schumer Disappears
Why, given that he's already burned bridges with the White House,
hasn’t the Democratic senator launched a full campaign to block the Iran
deal?
American Jews at the Service of Netanyahu
Who are U.S. Jewish leaders really representing when they lobby the
American president on behalf of Israel’s prime minister? Not their
fellow countrymen, for sure.
Le message d’Obama à Israël : vous êtes seuls
Dans un discours sur le nucléaire iranien, le président utilise une
tactique que les opposants juifs américains à l’accord auront du mal à
combattre : la question de la loyauté
Netanayhu, Herzog held secret meeting at Hollywood producer's home
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has held several unpublicized
meetings with the Hollywood film producer Arnon Milchan over the past
two months. The meetings were held at Milchan’s residence in Herzliya.
When Israeli Politicians Forget They Hold Public Office
Both Justice Minister Shaked and Culture and Sports Minister Regev were
embarrassed themselves this week on Facebook, when they reacted to the
High Court ruling on the anti-Infiltration Law.
ISRAEL ON THE EDGE OF THE ABYSS – MUST READ
YNET – Analysis: Israel is willing to do anything to thwart the nuclear
deal, including publicly threatening Iranian scientists, interfering
with the internal affairs of the US, and dividing US Jews; meanwhile,
Netanyahu’s mistaken 2002 assessment of Iraq is coming back to haunt him
in his battle against Tehran.
Israel Asks Egypt: Stop Move to Monitor Our Nuclear Facilities
Netanyahu's advisers went to Cairo three weeks ago to discuss matter
with Egypt Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, who heads effort to lobby
internationally against Israel's nuclear program.
Gideon Levy is the One-trick Pony of Israeli Journalism
Opposition leader Isaac Herzog responds to criticism levelled against
him by Haaretz's Gideon Levy, arguing that making peace also means
fighting terror - not just accepting the Palestinian narrative hook,
line and sinker.
Israel Asks Egypt: Stop Move to Monitor Our Nuclear Facilities
Netanyahu's advisers went to Cairo three weeks ago to discuss matter
with Egypt Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, who heads effort to lobby
internationally against Israel's nuclear program.
La nouvelle peste brune
Qu'ils soient Pieds-noirs, judéo-sionistes, immigrés italiens, polonais
ou d'Europe centrale ou simplement identitaires français : ils ont tous
quelque chose de commun. Ils ont en effet les mêmes rêves plein les
têtes ainsi que les mêmes obsessions. Et désormais le même plan
maléfique : semer les germes de la guerre en France. Et tous y trouvent
leur compte. Pour les Pieds noirs et affilés, ils y gagnent, du moins
espèrent-ils, une revanche sur ces « maudits Arabes » qui ont tété leur
haine depuis leur berceau, autant dire qu'ils l'ont suçotée des
mamelles de leurs mères.
Masked Israeli youth attack Palestinian in Hebron
IDF soldier detains Palestinian who is wanted for questioning by
police, but before the cops could get there, a group of settlers arrived
on the scene and attacked him.
Why Murdoch Pushes for War
Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild Israel has
granted oil exploration rights inside Syria, in the occupied Golan
Heights, to Genie Energy.
Les "portes ouvertes" de l'Europe - La "forteresse Europe" est prise de court
par les réactions de ses rues face à l'image d'un enfant mort, et semble
être obligée d'accepter d'accueillir des centaines de milliers de
"réfugiés" venant du Moyen Orient. L'Etat Islamique avait promis
"d'inonder" l'Europe de réfugiés (et d'islamistes), c'est donc chose
faite, et avec le sourire "bisounours" en plus !
Juste pour vous montrer que le discours de la
"dissidence" est absolument identique à celui des juifs intégristes de
juif.org! Ya pas un iota de différence... Mis à part le fait que la
dissidence se croit "antisioniste", alors qu'elle est carrément
manipulée et par les juifs sionistes en plus de ça! Israel Keeps Making, Not Taking, More Refugees
Israel Is Destroying Its Own Freedom If there is a symbol of the reality of Israeli rule in the occupied territories it is the photograph from Nabi Saleh.
Israel's 'Jewish Majority' Obsession What can we say about the Jewish majority if it's a majority for fascism, racism and hatred of Arabs and foreigners?
Torah Sage Predicted Almost 100 Years Ago a Third World War Before Redemption
Comme
si l'ancien testament concernait l'histoire récente et actuelle... Faut
vraiment être taré pour gober ça. Il y a des gens pas seulement tarés
mais dangereux qui font tout pour que ça arrive! Si leur prophétie se
réalise pas tout seul, ils vont la concrétiser pour se donner raison.
Israel troubled by potential conflict with Russians in Syria "Israel is Europe’s last Bulwark against Islam" Ex-Stasi Jewish Activist Tasked with Eradicating “Xenophobia” on Facebook in Germany Jews Call On President Obama To Take In Syrian Refugees
La vague de réfugiés, quelle est la vraie cible, par Israël Adam Shamir (Incluant des citations de Marx qui surprennent! "un certain Karl Marx, en arriva à la déduction révolutionnaire suivante : la foi de Mammon, cette “religion des Juifs pour les jours de semaine” -
ce sont ses propres mots - est devenue la véritable religion des élites
américaines. Marx cite, en l’approuvant, un certain colonel Hamilton : “Mammon
est l’idole des Yankees, ils ne l’adorent pas simplement en paroles,
mais aussi de toutes les forces de leur corps et de leur âme. A leurs
yeux, la terre n’est qu’une immense bourse des valeurs et ils sont
persuadés que leur unique mission sur la Terre est de devenir plus riche
que leur voisin.” Marx conclut : “Là où la domination effective
de la mentalité juive sur le monde chrétien a achevé son expansion,
totale et éclatante, c’est en Amérique du Nord.” La mentalité juive victorieuse, pour Marx, est basée sur l’”appât du gain et l’égoïsme, son credo, c’est les affaires ; son dieu : l’Argent.” [2] "
'Israel, the Cancer' causes stir
Italian documentary comparing IDF soldiers to Nazis, screened in
municipality-sponsored museum in town of Recanati; mayor apologizes.
FLASHBACK: Finkielkraut: son plaidoyer pour la France C'est
l'autre versant du même discours de propagande qui dit qu' Israel est
le seul état qui résiste activement par son identité à l'irrésistible
dissolution des frontières imposée par le mondialisme: "Quelles sont
donc les motivations de cette gauche fétide pour qu’elle manifeste sa
hargne, automatiquement et à tous propos, contre l’Etat du peuple juif
? La première des raisons est, que ce pays aux mœurs occidentales est, à
coup sûr, par excellence celui où la religion a droit de cité. Un pays,
et donc un peuple attaché depuis plusieurs millénaires à son culte
malgré les diverses oppressions subies de par le monde. Véritable défi
pour les gauchistes prônant l’abolition de toutes les croyances ! Le
second argument est que l’Etat du peuple juif représente aussi la
défense et la mise en valeur de la culture juive. Action qui contre, de
fait, le multiculturalisme, ce mélange de cultures si cher à ces
gauchistes ! L’Etat hébreu c’est également un état nation avec ses
emblèmes, son drapeau, son hymne et sa mémoire du passé évoquant et
exigeant la défense des frontières honnies par les gauchistes ! Si l’on
ajoute à tout cela l’amour de cette patrie par la quasi-totalité du
peuple juif, que ses composantes soient israéliennes ou diasporiques,
cela transforme cette nation en pays à abattre !" (L'antisémitisme a dorénavant un nom: Palestine!)
Jewish publication may drop Coulter over ‘F-ing Jews’ tweet Coulter defended her ” f—ing Jews” tweet saying “It’s not about Jewish people; it’s about Republican panderers.” Is Ann Coulter an anti-Semite?
The conservative columnist's infamous tweets marked a newsworthy
nuance: Republican support for Israel is not about Jewish voters, but
American interests.
C'est une désinformatrice néoconne qui dit
n'importe quoi (ex: elle croit que le Canada a combattu au Vietnam!)
alors les juifs vont lui pardonner, étant donné qu'elle est du bord des
extrémistes sionistes. C'est juste les juifs de gauche qui sont fâchés
contre elle. Ann Coulter’s Faux Pas: Calling Attention to Jewish Influence
McDonald
est idiot s'il croit que c'est un faux-pas. À mon avis c'est fait un
peu exprès pour qu'on croit que les juifs sont de gauche et surtout pas
comme elle, dans le camp des néocons! Il s'agit maintenant de faire
passer les agents de la droite sioniste, comme Trump et les
propagandistes néocons, comme des gens qui n'ont rien à voir avec les
juifs, alors que c'est exactement l'inverse qui est exact. Des
propagandistes néocons comme Coulter doivent maintenant tenir des propos
anti-juifs pour pas qu'une investigation journalistique puisse remonter
jusqu'aux juifs néocons qui les soutiennent. (Ce que Piper a déjà fait
même si personne le lit.) Ça contribue à brouiller les pistes. Les gens
vont croire que les juifs sont contre les droitistes à la Trump,
Coulter, etc. Alors que ces gens sont en fait des chèvres de Judas de la
pire espèce, militant de la guerre contre l'Islam, etc. Coulter openly confronts Jewish supremacy in the West Le
crétin fini John Friend tombe dans le paneau de Coulter et de Trump!
Profondément et absolument crétin! Ou bien agent de désinfo??
Boehner’s Successor Will Be pro-Israel, but Netanyahu Should Worry Nonetheless
Surprise resignation of Speaker could harm GOP’s 2016 electoral chances
and strengthen Tea Party types less attached to Israel. Now Boehner can tell us what really happened with Netanyahu’s speech
(...) Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer’s agreement to keep secret
Boehner’s invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to
address Congress — at the speaker’s request. Boehner and Dermer have
confirmed that the ambassador, who had consulted with Netanyahu, agreed
to keep the secret, from the Obama administration, congressional
Democrats and pro-Israel groups, including AIPAC. Boehner has said he
asked for secrecy to keep Obama from nixing the speech.(...) Dermer’s
“yes” meant Nancy Pelosi, the minority leader in the House, had to enter
the trenches in the effort to push back Boehner’s effort to kill the
deal — which was ultimately successful. Going forward, his “yes” means
Democrats on Capitol Hill are no longer so eager to return calls from
the Israeli embassy. It means there’s discussion on the Hill about
whether the “Israel is GOP territory” tag will die when Netanyahu leaves
office, or outlast him.
In a Moment of Euphoria, Netanyahu Made a Very Revealing Slipup
Thus spake the minister of defense, and his remarks have not yet been “seared into the consciousness”: “We know who burned the Dawabsheh family, but we cannot prosecute them because of the sensitivity of the sources.” That’s
our Bogie, who was never considered the most guided and accurate weapon
in the arsenal, and who even as a dairyman on the kibbutz would
entertain the cows to increase their milk yield. Did you get that? It
takes great effort to build an intelligence source, so it would be a
pity to blow his cover. His immunity also gives the murderers immunity. Bogie
knows, and that should suffice. That’s why we included him in “the list
of the most unforgettable quotes”; we shall not forget.
The Israeli Occupation of America: How Israel Gained Control of American Foreign Policy and Public Opinion
BY HESHAM TILLAWI (...)Secret letters and
secret meetings between Kennedy and Ben-Gurion give a clear picture of
the difficulty Kennedy faced in negotiating with the Israeli Prime
Minister who stated many times that nothing will save Israel but nuclear
power. According to author Michael Collins Piper in his book Final
Judgment Ben Gurion wrote Kennedy saying: “Mr. President, my people have
the right to exist, and this existence is in danger.”
Hey, What Ever Happened to the 'Existential Threat' of Iran?
I’ll leave out the speed with which the dreaded threat of Iranian
weaponry has disappeared from Israel’s political agenda and been
replaced by the supposedly equally deadly threat of teenagers throwing
stones. Gotta love it.
À voir qu'ils parlent même pu de la menace
iranienne mais juste des petits lanceurs de roches palestiniens, c'est à
se demander si la menac iranienne était vraiment plus importante que
des petits enfants lanceurs de roches...
Op-Ed: Ann Coulter is not an anti-SemiteThe well-known commentator and provocateur should be
judged by her pro-Israel record, not one angry tweet, a nationally
syndicated talk show host writes.
Qu'est-ce que je disais... C'est
exactement ce que je disais. Les juifs reconnaissent son positionnement
sioniste (qui est gros comme un éléphant au milieu du salon), donc ils
vont lui pardonner!
Trump, Israel, and the Jewish vote
Analysis: Even though his daughter converted to Judaism and he keeps
calling Netanyahu his friend, Jewish Americans will probably keep
supporting Democratic candidates.
C'est pas le vote juif qui est
important ici!!! Ils parlent de vote juif pour nous faire croire que
Trump n'a pas l'appui des sionistes. C'est la puissance du lobby
israélien et non le vote juif qui a vraiment une influence dans
l'élection du président américain. C'est pas le
vote juif qui pourrait faire élire Trump, c'est la puissance du lobby
israélien. Quand Bush Jr a été élu, il a eu à peu près 0% du vote juif;
les juifs avaient tous voté pour Al Gore! Il a fallu que Bush Jr. vole
l'élection pour que ses maîtres (Israel) puissent le mettre au pouvoir.
Les juifs américains ont été grandement surpris par l'élection truquée
de Bush Jr. Le lobby israélien n'a pas besoin du vote juif, qui est
insignifiant aux USA de toute façon, sauf dans quelques États (NY,
etc.).
Why BDS should target Saudi Arabia, not Israel
Op-ed: It's time to give Saudi Arabian authorities an ultimatum: Either
you cease exporting religious extremism or you will be served the fare
of boycott, divestment and sanctions served to Israel.
C'est ce
qu'on entend tout le temps du côté de la "Dissidence": les méchants sont
identifiés vaguement comme étant les "sionistes" mais les seuls qui
sont identifiés clairement et reçoivent le blâme concrètement c'est pas
Israël c'est l'Arabie Saoudite et le Qatar! Comme si les "Sionistes"
c'étaient les Arabes!
WATCH: Trump, Carson Will 'Have Blood on Their Hands' if
Gunman Targets Mosque, Says Jebreal 'In the realm of possibility in a
country that is very armed that somebody that will be carrying weapon
will go to a mosque tomorrow or after tomorrow and would start shooting
people and then these people would have blood on their hands.'
Aux Temps Bénis du nationalisme Arabe Ce
papier est publié à l’occasion de la commémoration du 45e anniversaire
du décès de Gamal Abdel Nasser, chef historique du nationalisme arabe
contemporain.
FLASHBACK: The world was right about Iraq– though Israel got its ‘Clean Break’, June 14, 2014 Enter the Bush Doctrine
The four pillars of the president's strategy for winning World War IV.
By [ULTRA-ZIONIST NEOCON JEW] Norman Podhoretz Updated Sept. 2, 2004
(Editor's note: This is excerpted from Mr. Podhoretz's article, "World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win," which appears in the September issue of Commentary.) Voir la version française (et résumée) de Réseau Voltaire.
Podhoretz sur les Troisième et Quatrième guerres mondiales: "For
these reasons, I agree with one of our leading contemporary students of
military strategy, Eliot A. Cohen, who thinks that what is generally
called the "Cold War" (a term, incidentally, coined by Soviet
propagandists) should be given a new name. "The Cold War," Mr. Cohen
writes, was actually "World War III, which reminds us that not all
global conflicts entail the movement of multimillion-man armies, or
conventional front lines on a map." I also agree that the nature of the
conflict in which we are now engaged can only be fully appreciated if we
look upon it as World War IV. To justify giving it this name--rather
than, say, the "war on terrorism"--Mr. Cohen lists "some key features"
that it shares with World War III: that it is, in fact, global; that it
will involve a mixture of violent and nonviolent efforts; that it will
require mobilization of skill, expertise and resources, if not of vast
numbers of soldiers; that it may go on for a long time; and that it has
ideological roots. There is one more feature that World War IV shares
with World War III and that Mr. Cohen does not mention: Both were
declared through the enunciation of a presidential doctrine."
Mossad Takes Pride in One of Its Worst Debacles
61 years after the revelation of the Lavon Affair, the original ‘false
flag’ operation, Israel’s spooks believe it was more bad luck than
embarrassment, if it was embarrassing at all.
Avraham Burg on 'The Coming Days'
Former senior politician is releasing a new book which calls on Israel
to analyze its collective past to improve its future. Il a écrit "The
Holocaust is Over - We Must Rise From Its Ashes"
Sakhnin’s mayor, Mazen Ghnaim, who is also the acting head of the
Higher Arab Monitoring Committee, said at the rally: “We warned ahead of
time and we said ‘stop the extremists,’ but no one listened. The
Palestinian people went out to protect its rights and for independence
and liberation from the occupation.
'An Israeli Sniper Shot Me'
A 13-year-old boy from a refugee camp next to Bethlehem was killed by
an IDF soldier for no apparent reason. The army's response: 'It was a
mistake.'
Israël connaît le terrorisme, pas le « PADAMALGAM »
Article de merde... On voit que les médias alternatifs sont pire encore
que les grands médias, car ils relaient le discours de l'ultra droite
sioniste, qui est encore trop extrême pour les médias de masse!
L'article félicite les israéliens d'appeler "terroristes" les
Palestiniens qui tuent des Israéliens, alors qu'en France on appelle à
clamer les esprits en mettant en garde contre toute forme d'amalgame...
What you don’t know about Marco Rubio The GOP presidential candidate's main patron is a
Jewish billionaire, he's hawkish on Israel and he has belonged to Mormon
and Baptist churches despite being Catholic.
Netanyahu Traps Israel in a World of False Images
The prime minister is actually saying this: The right didn't incite to
Rabin’s murder, although he was murdered, and you in the left are
inciting to my murder, even though you won't murder me.
The disgrace of Jewish extremism C'est
un juif qui parle évidemment. De notre point de vue non-juif c'est pas
une disgrâce, c'est juste la conséquence logique de leurs croyances
débiles, attardées, barbares, dépassées depuis des millénaires...
VIDEO - France2 : 10h dans Paris avec une kippa
Une vidéo mise en ligne par un journaliste israélien le montre marchant
dans Paris avec une kippa. Crachats, insultes… et plus de 5 millions de
"vues" sur les sites de partage vidéo. Est-ce la réalité pour tous les
juifs de France ? Pour "Envoyé spécial" diffusé jeudi 15 octobre à
20h55, Thierry Vincent a lui aussi mis une kippa et arpenté les rues de
plusieurs villes françaises... (Bref, c'était une opération de
propagande sioniste produite par des ultra sionistes israéliens d'un
journal de Sheldon Adelson, ami et financier de Bibi Netanyahou.) Est-il dangereux de porter une kippa dans la rue en France ? NON !!!
Israelis Who Are Lost to Democracy
Israel is perpetrating horrors in the territories at a frequency and
degree never seen before. Not that most Israelis seem to care.
Don't Be Fooled by Netanyahu's Sleight of Hand on Settlements
Rejecting any claim that settlements play a part in the current
violence, Netanyahu has adopted data showing he's built less than his
predecessors. But don't believe the statistics. Netanyahu Has 24 Hours Left to Apologize for the Incitement
That Ended in Rabin’s Murder It's true Netanyahu did not want a
murder. But incitement doesn't follow the inciter's plan. It has ways to
bring the hand to the knife, the finger to the trigger.
Israel: A lesson in anti-democracy Op-ed:
Justice minister Ayelet Shaked aims to label 'Israel haters' by making
representatives of leftist NGOs wear badges during Knesset discussions.
So what color will she choose for the leftist patch?
Are Palestinians Murderers From Birth or an Incited Herd?
For Israel, They're Both If there is no one to talk to, why is the
Jerusalem municipality sending local Palestinian parents a letter about
how to shield their children from ‘incitement’?
President's wife put under guard
Due to possible incitement against President Rivlin on social media, a
personal security detail has been assigned to his wife Nechama. (...)
Hagai Amir, brother of Yitzhak Rabin's assassin Yigal Amir, was arrested
last week on suspicion of incitement against Rivlin. "Rivlin is a
sycophantic politican," Amir said in a Facebook post.
Tous les Israéliens ne pleurent pas Yitzhak Rabin 'Rabin, the Last Day': An important film
In his complex and seemingly disorganized way, director Amos Gitai has
crafted a memorial of the Israeli PM's murder and the incitement that
preceded it, as well as a stinging indictment of today's politicians.
From this perspective, 'Rabin, the Last Day' touches the raw nerves in
Israeli society without resorting to clichés.
Netanyahu and Obama's blind date
The prime minister came out of his meeting with the American president
this week glowing, and said it was one of their best ever; officials in
the White House were a bit more even-tempered.
Ça va bien entre eux... seulement s'ils parlent pas de l'Iran! 'Obama treats Netanyahu with less respect than he gives to Iran's ayatollah,' Rubio says We won't give up Temple Mount, Israeli rabbis tell Obama
Some 70 religious Zionist rabbis and educators issue a petition
directed at the Israeli and American leaders, stating that the Jewish
ownership of the holy site preceded the existence of Islam. Therefore,
they say, the current visitation and prayer arrangements at the Temple
Mount are 'only temporary.'
Israeli Media Is Buying What Netanyahu Is Selling
Power struggles among local media are nothing more than business
disputes. There is no ideological clash here. At most, there's just
disagreement over nuances.
Were All Palestinians Killed in Hebron Recently Really a Threat to Soldiers?
There are two versions to the recent spate of killings at Hebron
checkpoints: IDF says Palestinians attacked them with knives and were
shot, while Palestinians question whether the people even had knives at
all. Haaretz examines the evidence.
How the Rabbinate creates bastard children
In a recent case, a divorced woman was denied right to remarry because
she has a baby and is subject to halachic rule of nursing. After asking
her intrusive questions, religious judges decide to include her son on a
secret blacklist of 'mamzerim.'
Cela
démontre que la Dissidence ER est sur la même ligne
(finkie-zemmour-goldnadienne, ou néo-Répubicain/FN) que des groupes
juifs extrémistes comme le média juif Europe-Israel. C'est toujours le
même discours: "la gauche est la source du mal"! Selon ER, le pire mal
c'est la gauche sioniste (incluant forcément la gauche israélienne
anti-guerre et propalestinienne). Selon Europe-Israel, le mal c'est la
gauche antisioniste (incluant aussi forcément la gauche israélienne
anti-guerre et propalestinienne). Autres exemples qui viennent tous du
même site:
In the Dark on the ‘Dark Side’
The “War on Terror” – now more than 14 years long – has trapped the
U.S. and other nations in the “dark side” of human behavior, a dilemma
that is both moral and practical because the continued use of brutal
methods has only made the crisis worse, as Nicolas J S Davies explains.
Daech revendique les attaques de Paris selon l'organisation SITE de l'ultra-sioniste Rita Katz. En français En arabe
Voir:
L’origine
de la mise en ligne de cette cassette est douteuse : "Pour ce qui est
du site Web en langue arabe « lié à Al Quaeda » qui aurait diffusé le
fichier vidéo, www.al-ansar.biz, il n’est plus en service. Le nom de
domaine a été enregistré auprès d’un régistraire aux États-Unis le 7
janvier 2003 au nom d’un certain Omar AbuOmar, qui a donné une adresse
fictive au Danemark, et une adresse de courriel Hotmail. Le service
d’hébergement du site, tassmeem.net, semble lui aussi hors service. Le
nom de domaine a été enregistré le 13 janvier 2002 auprès d’un
régistraire aux États-Unis. L’adresse citée pour l’entreprise est au
Caire (Égypte), l’adresse des services techniques est à Riyadh (Arabie
Saoudite), certaines recherches DNS pointent vers des serveurs en
Malaisie". C’est la société malaisiienne de "web servers" de Kuala
Lumpur, Acme Commerce Sdn Bhd, créée en 1998, qui était responsable du
site, qu’elle fermera aussitôt en déclarant ne pas en avoir vérifié le
contenu. Le gouvernement malaisien mettra en fait une journée à faire
fermer le site. Aux Etats-Unis, imparablement, la "découvreuse" de la
vidéo juste après Al-Djezira sera bien entendu l’inévitable Rita Katz. A
peine la vidéo reprise, le débat éclatait... au sein de l’armée
américaine, certains se plaignant de ne pas avoir réussi à en bloquer la
diffusion via l’organisme ad hoc. Qui avait favorisé la diffusion de
cette vidéo et pourquoi voilà bien tout le problème... En tout cas, il y
en a une qui avait saisi l’occasion au vol (à moins de la mettre
elle-même dans le réseau !). Rita Katz, la première à mettre en ligne en
2007 la fameuse vidéo de Ben Laden et même à se la faire piquer par la
Maison Blanche, qui tentera avec elle un dernier coup médiatique après
la diffusion de 28 millions de DVD sur le djihad sanglant ("Obsession",
via le Clarion Fond ; fondé par l’extrême droitiste Raphael Shore).Celle
du Ben Laden à la barbe teinte et devenu par la grâce de son dieu, on
le suppose... droitier. http://www.agoravox.fr/tribune-libre/article/wikileaks-et-l-assassinat-de-nick-83971
In Europe, the penny still hasn’t dropped
Op-ed: Years of accusing Israel of treating Palestinians like Nazis
treated Jews, years of total blindness towards Palestinians' rejection
of any peace proposal, have led to intellectual disability among
Europe's elites in general, and Germany's in particular.
Ils sont
convaincus que la puissance de l'islamisme en Europe et dans le monde
vient du fait que l'Europe est malade de son obsession anti-Israël. Et
si c'était plutôt Israël qui s'arrangeait pour nous faire haïr les
musulmans, pour nous pousser plus ou moins subtilement à prendre parti
pour Israël contre les Palestiniens?
How would Orwell feel about today’s college campuses?
As students ‘occupy’ Brandeis University this week, a look at how the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict is playing out at universities in a new
post-PC world order
Le complot du lavage de cerveau pro-palestinien
dans les universités? LOL Et ce sont ces gens là qui voient du lavage de
cerveau pro-palestinien partout qui exigent plus de contrôle de la
pensée dans les milieux universitaires...
Roseanne, Israeli writer butt heads on Twitter Comedian calls Rogel Alpher ‘privileged fat skinhead,’ after Haaretz columnist urges French Jews to stay in France.
Elle est ultra sioniste...
Se référant au boycott, une universitaire juive refuse d’aider un enfant israélien
L’ex universitaire de Cambridge, où elle ne travaille plus depuis un
certain temps, selon Paul Holland responsable de la communication de
l’université, a noté qu’elle était « membre de Jews for Justice for
Palestinians (Juifs pour la Justice pour les Palestiniens). Je soutiens
Boycott, Désinvestissement, et Sanctions ». Elle a ajouté : « Vous
pourriez être un enfant, mais si vous êtes assez âgée pour m’écrire,
vous l’êtes aussi pour en apprendre davantage sur l’histoire d’Israël et
sur la façon dont cela a eu des répercussions sur la vie des
Palestiniens. Peut-être que votre famille a les mêmes points de vue
que moi, mais j’en doute. » Levine a renvoyé Shachar sur le site de
Jews for Justice for Palestinians, et en particulier une page qui
saluait le travail des « nouveaux historiens » israéliens qui « ont dans
l’ensemble confirmé les conclusions des historiens arabes… et
inversement ont réfuté les affirmations des traditionnels historiens
‘sionistes’, dont le travail a été démontré comme comportant un grand
nombre de légendes nationalistes ».
IDF Censors Israeli Media Report Exposing Israeli Double Agent
Yesterday, I broke a major story revealing for the first time that
Boris Krasny, a wealthy Israeli business and political fixer, once was a
KGB agent turned by the Mossad, who became an Israeli double agent. He
is credited with exposing another major spy in Israel, Marcus
Klingberg, who’d worked for the KGB for nearly 30 years, while serving
as a high-level scientific researcher in the field of biological
warfare.
Surprise, Surprise! San Bernardino shooter’s dad: He was ‘obsessed’ with Israel CA attacker 'hated Israel' JMSM Attack CAIR For Quickly Denouncing San Bernardino Shootings San Bernardino shooters were radicalized 'for quite some time,' FBI says "He
said he shared the ideology of (ISIS leader Abu Bakr) al-Baghdadi to
create an Islamic state, and he was fixated on Israel," the elder Farook
told La Stampa newspaper. Top Israel advocate uses San Bernardino killings to attack Islam Hatred of Israel was reported motive for CA attack, but US press politely ignores the story Quelle horreur! 7 décembre 2015 | John R. MacArthur est éditeur de «Harper’s Magazine». "Oui,
je pense que les frappes aériennes contre le groupe EI (avec les
inévitables victimes civiles) alimentent les terroristes ; oui, le choix
de François Hollande de singer Barack Obama dans sa politique étrangère
et d’insister sur la démission d’Assad comme préalable aux négociations
a été contre-productif ; oui, je soupçonne la complicité des Saoudiens
dans le financement du groupe EI ; oui, je pense qu’une nouvelle
stratégie au Moyen-Orient doit commencer par l’éloignement de la France
et de l’Amérique de l’Arabie saoudite et par la condamnation de ses
subventions à la construction de madrasas et mosquées à travers le monde
musulman. Selon Le Monde, ces « lieux […] prêchent une vulgate
intolérante, soubassement idéologique des exactions pratiquées par les
séides d’Al-Baghdadi ». Et oui, je pense qu’un état d’urgence prolongé
est aussi dangereux pour la France démocratique qu’absurde dans le
contexte d’une Europe libérale sans frontières." VIDEO - Il met les choses au clair concernant la diabolisation de l’Islam par les médias En passant la citation de Richard Martineau "Tous les musulmans ne sont pas terroristes, mais tous les terroristes sont musulmans" vient en réalité du propagandiste anti-islam et idéologue néoconservateur juif Daniel Pipes, qui voit dans l'Islam le nouvel avatar de l'ancien complot communiste contre l'Occident. Nullement crédible.
Les "représentants" de la communauté juive contre le Front nationalLes
organisations les plus en vue de la communauté juive continuent de
combattre le racisme, mais c'est pour cacher le fait que les
intellectuels juifs tels que Finkie, Goldnadel et Zemmour n'ont pas peur
du néo-FN sioniste anti-islam. La même chose se produit aux USA, où les
grandes organisations juives condamnent les propos de Trump qui s'en
prend ouvertement aux musulmans, alors que dans les faits les juifs
adhèrent à la thèse du choc des civilisations et favorisent la guerre
mondiale contre l'Islam et le terrorisme. La haine contre Mohammed,
comme lidée que Mohammed serait pédophile, vient des milieux juifs
israéliens sionistes ultras. Les organisations juives s'arrangent pour
garder les mains propres et nous laisser la responsabilité du mal
qu'elles font, pour pas qu'on puisse leur reprocher la montée de
l'islamophobie et de la haine anti-arabe. Or un ancien directeur de la
CIA a clairement identifé la communauté juive américaine et Israël comme
étant la source véritable du déferlement de haine anti-arabe et
anti-islam aux USA.
Lieberman launches campaign to remove Zoabi from Knesset
'Together, we will kick out terror supporters from the Knesset,' says
Yisrael Beytenu leader who is promoting a bill to prevent Supreme Court
from overturning decisions to ban candidates from running for
parliament.
Palestinian indicted for inciting video Mais
quand c'est des incitations israéliennes anti-palestiniennes, la preuve
semble tout d'un coup très difficile à établir, ce qui fait que
comparativement très peu d'Israéliens subissent les mêmes peines, aussi
dures que celles subies par les Palestiniens.
Right-wingers Flag Up a Bigger Problem in Israel
Even when we are appalled by the antics of some right-wing groups,
their actions aren't always as absurd as they may initially appear. The discourse of hatred: A victory for marginal groups
This is a warning call: Something bad is happening to us. The margins
are taking over the public discourse, turning it into a discourse of
hatred.
Ils ont un tas de petits Zemmours très bruyants dans l'arène politique en Israel...
Defining Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism “The EU’s actions make sense only as an example of anti-Jewish hate”.
Selon
eux l'UE est le plus gros antisémite de la planète parce qu'ils aident
le boycott anti-israel en imposant l'étiquetage des produits des
territoires occupés... Les USA ont peur de l'UE, qui est pour eux bien
anti-israel, et veulent l'asservir. Et nous on est censé crore que l'UE
est le mal absolu... À qui ça profite de diaboliser au max l'UE sous sa
forme actuelle?
Loving to hate: Social media incitement on the rise
From hatred of Arabs to cursing LGBTs and despising leftists, a new
investigation shows a worrying increase in incitement and racism on
social media – and in calls for severe physical violence. Integrating Israel Arabs Is a Worthy Cause for Israel
Much still needs to be done to advance the conditions of Israel’s Arab
citizens, but most in need are the Arab residents of East Jerusalem.
VIDEO - La France est un pays profondément raciste. Nous avons, nous les blancs,
400 ans d'esclavage, 350 ans de colonisation; ça ne s'efface pas comme
ça. FBI on San Bernardino massacre: Alleged shooters did NOT post support for jihad on social media Courriels de menaces : Los Angeles ferme ses écoles, mais pas New York
Le Los Angeles Times a publié sur son site l'analyse du courriel du
représentant démocrate Brad Sherman, qui dit douter de la crédibilité de
la menace contre les écoles. Il affirme que le texte du message ne
ressemble pas au style habituel des djihadistes. Brad Sherman était le
président de la sous-commission sur le terrorisme de la Chambre des
représentants. M. Sherman précise que le message ne fait référence ni à
Allah, ni au Coran, ni au prophète Mahomet. Le message montre selon
lui une meilleure connaissance des armes d'assaut que de l'islam. «
N'importe qui au Nebraska aurait pu écrire ce message », a-t-il dit. M.
Sherman poursuit son analyse en indiquant que le message contient un
terme pornographique, ce que « les musulmans pratiquants et les
extrémistes ne font jamais », a-t-il précisé. Il a indiqué que l'auteur
du courriel a déclaré avoir été victime d'intimidation. Selon lui, le
message manque de crédibilité. Il a dit ignorer si le message avait été
envoyé par un djihadiste, une personne qui a une intention
anti-islamique ou juste un farceur.
Online store tells customer: 'We don't sell to Arabs'
A youth from Haifa called the website of shop 'Class Deal' after the
shoes he had ordered 4 months ago never arrived; a site representative
swore at and insulted him: 'You dog, you terrorist, if I'd known you
were a stinking Arab I wouldn't have approved your order.'
End political correctness
Op-ed: When politics evades issues for fear of incorrectness,
frustrated voters escape straight into the arms of non-institutional
radicalism.
Putin my fan? It’s mutual, says Trump
GOP presidential hopeful says Russian president is ‘running his country
and at least he’s a leader, unlike what we have in this country’
Fascism in Israel? It's Up to You
I'm sick to death of the Zionism of horseshit, of the incitement which
prides itself on hatred and, yes, that 'beautiful face' of fascism. It's
up to every one of us. We can stand up now, or be put down later. Like
dogs. A Plant Named Occupation Has Grown Into a Deep-rooted Tree
When someone says something against the occupation, he is attacked as
if he is the ultimate enemy of all Jews from the time of Moses to Yair
Lapid.
VIDEO - Réponse à Ibrahim Nobel, Ali Ayin, etc : et si la dissidence était anti-nationaliste ?
Ces gens sulfureux salissent tout ce qu'ils touchent, donc le fait
qu'il appuient les nationalistes Assad et Poutine va plutôt nuire aux
nationalistes tels que Poutine et Assad... Pour vraiment aider ces
nationalistes Poutine et Assad, il faut surtout pas leur envoyer des
Dieudonné et des Soral dans les pattes, ça peut juste leur nuire!
The Left must not adopt the Right's Holocaust discourse
Op-ed: In Netanyahu's nightmarish world, the Jewish people are always
the victims fighting for their lives, and their rivals are Nazis. But
not every threat is existential, and one can be a huge villain without
being a Nazi.
How do you say 'tycoon' in Yiddish?
The rich want to accumulate wealth at the expense of the poor and the
rabbis work for whoever has money: this is not a snapshot from today,
but rather from a booklet that documents the spirit of the age in
Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 20th century.
Will Israel Be a Better Place With a Prime Minister Behind Bars?
In a region where leaders are replaced only with bloodshed, Israel is
the only country that has deposed and imprisoned its former leaders by
due process. Yet, Ehud Olmert's conviction should leave no room for
complacency.
Petraeus Tells Haaretz: U.S. Image as War-weary Emboldens the Enemy
C'est la même chose, identique, qu'on entend du côté de William
Kristol, le roi des juifs néocons. Ces néocons exigent que les USA
fassent des démonstrations de force et jouent à la police mondiale,
autrement ils croient que ça va encourager et renforcer la détermination
des ennemis d'Israel et des USA à attaquer.
Adjusting Israel's TV to the Right
Removing Channel 33 from the broadcast lineup of Idan Plus in favor of
Channel 20 symbolizes a worsening of the government’s treatment of its
Arab citizens, who are now totally excluded from its official broadcast
lineup.
Minister Steinitz Calls Swedish FM 'anti-Semitic'
Steinitz slams Swedish call to investigate Israel for treatment of
Palestinians; Deputy Foreign Minister Hotovely says 'Israel is
closing its gates to official visits from Sweden'; Senior official says
no such decision has been made.
Minister Steinitz Calls Swedish FM 'anti-Semitic'
Steinitz slams Swedish call to investigate Israel for treatment of
Palestinians; Deputy Foreign Minister Hotovely says 'Israel is
closing its gates to official visits from Sweden'; Senior official says
no such decision has been made.
Why Israel's Government of Inciters Can't Win The battle now is a battle for democracy, and
therefore we will defeat you. That’s how it is everywhere in the world and that’s how it is here.
Jew who stabbed Arab gets less than two years
C'est donc pas considéré comme une tentative de meurtre... À moins
qu'Israel donne juste 2 ans de prison pour tentative de meurtre? Ça
serait surprenant.
Les massacres sont-ils plus intéressants lorsqu’ils
sont commis par des "musulmans"?
VIDEO -
Un extraordinaire débat « complotiste » sur l’affaire Merah chez Schneidermann La "guerre des civilisations" démontée par Raphaël Liogier
Raphaël Liogier a deux nouvelles pour nous. L’une est bonne: La guerre des civilisations n’aura pas lieu. L’autre est mauvaise: l’Europe souffre depuis soixante ans d’un Complexe de Suez dont l’aggravation actuelle cause «le vrai déclin français
et du continent». Avec les deux ouvrages portant ces titres (et avec Le mythe de l’islamisation. Essai sur une obsession collective,
qui ressort en poche avec une nouvelle postface post-13 novembre), le
sociologue et philosophe, professeur à l’Institut
d’études politiques d’Aix-en-Provence et directeur de l’Observatoire du
religieux, remonte le courant des croyances générales, en s’appuyant
sur un travail empirique et sur l’épreuve des faits.
Finkielkraut « Prix de la soumission: Je propose la maire de Cologne »
La dissidence s'est fait avoir : son pseudo anti-judaïsme l'a conduit
dans le même camp que Finkie! La dissidence est rendue sur la même ligne
que Finkie, la seule différence est que la dissidence se croit
antijuive ou antisioniste... Comble de la stupidité:
travailler pour son ennemi en croyant le combattre.
Jewish terror bomber claims influence with Ted Cruz C'est le terroriste juif "Victor Vancier", qui disait à propos du terrorisme juif:
In
1986, the New York-based leader of the terrorist Jewish Defense League,
Victor Vancier, gave a prophetic hint of what may have been finally
played out on Sept. 11, 2001: "If you think the Shias in Lebanon are
capable of fantastic acts of suicidal terrorism, the Jewish underground
will strike targets that will make Americans gasp: 'How could Jews do
such things?'" According to Vancier, quoted by Robert I. Friedman in
The Village Voice on May 6, 1986, his allies were "desperate people"
who "don't care if they live or die."
VIDEO - Chaim Ben Pesach (Victor Vancier) JTF This Week: Innocent Jew faces murder charge; JTF Ted Cruz blitz begins.
Ce célèbre terroriste juif en campagne pour Ted Cruz et défend un autre
terroriste juif qui a mis le feu à une maison palestinienne et tué une
famille incluant un bébé palestinien. Aucune controverse, auun scandale
on n'en entend parler nulle part...
Netanyahu's pathetic primaries chicanery
Op-ed: The call for early primaries in the Likud party and the
decision to cancel them 4 days later lead us to an absurd situation. A
sitting prime minister, whose power and influence are hard to even
estimate, is afraid not just of future competitors, but even to compete
against himself.
Ari Shavit, You’ve Fallen Into the Trap of 'Extremists on Both Sides'
As opposed to the Haaretz columnist's claim, in reality not a single
word has been spoken in support of left-wing activist Ezra Nawi’s
statements about informing on Palestinians to the Palestinian Authority.
In Glock We Trust: Ultra-Orthodox Settlement Guns Up
A gun sale sponsored by the municipality in the settlement of Betar
Ilit highlights a near 180 in how the religious view gun ownership in
light of recent violence: 'The more the merrier, regrettably.'
VIDEO - Propagandistes sionistes confrontés à la télé française
Intervention balayée du revers de la main pour "antisémitisme!".
Colonialisme et vendetta sans fin au nom du peuple élu de dieu.. mais le
dire ouvertement c'est tenir le discours antisémite classique?
NathalieGoulet @Senateur 61: La logique de la semaine: #KippaPourTous et #LeVoilePourPersonne, j'exagère un peu mais n'y aurait-il pas un double standard?
Crise migratoire : la peste brune refait surface en Europe
C'est
pas la même "peste brune" que celle d'antan... c'est un nouveau
mouvement raciste haineux populiste différent du fascisme. (À l'époque
il y avait pas autant d'immigrants en Europe, donc forcément le fascisme
et le nazisme historique étaient très différents des prétendus nazis
fascistes d'aujourd'hui, qui sont rendus presque tous les idiots utiles
du sionisme, même s'ils sont antijuifs, ça change rien au final, ils
restent les idiots utiles du sionisme à cause de leur combat anti-islam
et anti-immigrant, combat absolument identique à celui des Israéliens
racistes contre les arabes, les musulmans, et les noirs, et tous ceux
qui ont la peau foncée.) Comme disait Askolovitch, les anciens fachos
étaient anti-démocratiques et autoritaires, alors que les nouveaux
populistes anti-islam défendent des idées très démocrates et libérales
libertaires et anti-autoritaires (ou bien, dit autrement, ils voient ne
d'autoritarisme que chez les étrangers, en particulier musulmans)! “Rape White Women without Mercy!
C'est juste un canular évident... Comme si un annonceur de CNN allait
appeler au viol. Il est très inquiétant de voir l'impressionnante
quantité de débiles mentaux et de déficients dans la "complosphère" qui
vont gober tous ces canulars sans se poser la moindre question...
L’Occident malade de lui-même. On ne construira l’Europe qu’en la déculpabilisant
"Causeur" c'est le journal d'Elisabeth Lévy: une sorte de Soral (grande
gueule gueularde) qui surfe sur l'anti-rectitude politique, mais qui se
bat dans le même camp fanatiquement anti-islam que Finkie et
Zemmour, ces juifs sionistes qui se croient plus Français que les
Français, plus nationaux que le FN. Causeur fait dans cet article la
promotion de Alexandre Del Valle, un ancien de l'extrême-droite devenu
aujourd'hui partisan de la lutte contre l'islam, promoteur de la théorie
du complot islamo-américain. Semblable à la théorie des néocons comme Frank Gaffney qui disent qu'Obama est soumis à l'islam des Frères musulmans, etc.
La répression identitaire bat son plein... Bottez-moi le cul, je suis blanc et catholique ! par Richard Martineau
Le
site vigile est vraiment en train de sombrer depuis un bout de temps
dans le marasme des préoccupations identitaires, ça fait d'eux les
idiots utiles des promoteurs du choc sioniste des civilisations entre
l'islam et pratiquement le reste du monde au grand complet... C'est une
subversion du mouvement souverainiste par des éléments identitaires, que
ce soit des blancs canayens-français ou seulement catholiques romains
occidentaux mais au niveau des "valeurs" , étant non-pratiquants. Les
groupes identitaires sont souvent les plus ardents promoteurs de l'idée
de guerre ("choc") des civilisations entre l'Islam et l'Occident. Ils
vont souvent tenir le discours anti-rectitude politique, ce qui leur
attire des millions de sympathisants qui aiment se faire dire ce qu'ils
veulent entendre. Toute leur notoriété et leur gloire vient de là, du
fait qu'ils ont l'air de brasser la cage de la rectitude politique. Et
pendant ce temps là les vrais diseurs de vérité sont tus ou seulement
enterrés par le bruit ambiant.
De Villiers travaille avec son grand ami juif anglais Sir Jimmy Goldsmith depuis longtemps:
ils ont flairé le biz du buzz longtemps avant Soral et Dieudo... Je vous laisse
remplir vous-mêmes les vides et les sous-entendus ici.
Le principal problème que je vois dans le cas de De Villiers
c'est sa promotion de la théorie du grand complot islamo-américain, d'Obama
agent des Frères musulmans, du CFR et de Bilderberg derrière l'islam migrateur
et dissolvant, théorie qui soit en passant est bien reçue également du
côté de la nouvelle extrême-droite désormais infiltrée et cooptée par les
sionistes... C'est aussi la théorie du néocon Frank Gaffney, signataire du
PNAC, notamment. Rand Paul y souscrit lui aussi, mais un peu plus subtilement
que Gaffney. Toute cette propagande désinformatrice contribue à réaliser la
pseudo prophétie du "choc des civilisations", sous prétexte de
révélation d'un plan de domination mondiale islamo-américain, ou
américano-islamique.
